That was a wonderful video presentation. That was the first time anyone has ever adequately. explained the actual concept of using a 35 mm lens in a manner that I can understand. Thank you so much 😊
Another very well made video/tutorial, I recently got the Fuji XF16-50 (for its internal zooming mechanism and because I wanted a new toy), and I find that on the street I’m mostly shooting between 23-35 mm (35-50 ff equivalent) focal length. Be well.
I always want to love the 50mm but the 35mm is just my true love. It’s the lens for everything for me and never stays home. The 40mm is a very, very close 2nd.
I picked up a Voightlander 35mm f1.4 Nokton Classic for Sony a year ago. I swore off 35mm lenses years ago but the deal was too good. It was hidden in a lot Canon EF lenses. In the end it cost me about $150 after selling the rest. And its amazing. I am a 28mm and 50ish shooter but love the 35 even though its MF. Great video Doriyan.
What does “equal to what our eyes sees” actually mean? Our eyes have really wide angles, close to 180 degrees. That’s very far from what a 35mm or 50mm gives you. I’m just confused why this comparison keeps coming up among photographers. Anyway, nice video and nicely argued reasons for 35mm.
@@doriyancoleman I know, I was paraphrasing. You said “35mm feels familiar to look through since it’s so close to what our eyes naturally see”. And that’s what confuses me. In what way is 35mm close to what our eyes see? I’m not trying to argue with you, I’m just trying to understand why photographers say things like that. It’s always confused me. My experience of my own sight is not something I’ve been able to see with any lens even the widest ones.
That was a wonderful video presentation. That was the first time anyone has ever adequately. explained the actual concept of using a 35 mm lens in a manner that I can understand. Thank you so much 😊
Means a lot to read that. Glad I could help! 🙌🏾
SUCH A GREAT VIDEO! Short, to the point and lots of (great) photos to visualize your words
I'm glad that you enjoyed it 🙏
Happy holidays and all the best to you kiddo ✌️
You too, my friend. Happy holidays 🙏
I like the 18-55mm .
Me too 🤝
Another very well made video/tutorial, I recently got the Fuji XF16-50 (for its internal zooming mechanism and because I wanted a new toy), and I find that on the street I’m mostly shooting between 23-35 mm (35-50 ff equivalent) focal length. Be well.
Being able to switch between 35 and 50 in a pinch must be convenient! Always great to see you Enrique. Thank you for your long time support.
I always want to love the 50mm but the 35mm is just my true love. It’s the lens for everything for me and never stays home. The 40mm is a very, very close 2nd.
35mm is so versatile!
So 24 is environmental and 35 is subject and background and 75 is isolated like portraits?
While all focal lengths can be experimented with, what you said is a good start!
I have a hard time with composition 😢❤
Keep practicing!
I picked up a Voightlander 35mm f1.4 Nokton Classic for Sony a year ago. I swore off 35mm lenses years ago but the deal was too good. It was hidden in a lot Canon EF lenses. In the end it cost me about $150 after selling the rest. And its amazing. I am a 28mm and 50ish shooter but love the 35 even though its MF. Great video Doriyan.
Consolidating gear for the win! Glad you've been enjoying your time with the 35mm lens -- they do a lot of things well. Thanks for watching!
Are you still using the voigtlander 23mm on your Fuji? Keep up the good work
Not at the moment. Winter in Cleveland is a bit too much for non-weather sealed gear. Thanks!
What does “equal to what our eyes sees” actually mean? Our eyes have really wide angles, close to 180 degrees. That’s very far from what a 35mm or 50mm gives you. I’m just confused why this comparison keeps coming up among photographers.
Anyway, nice video and nicely argued reasons for 35mm.
I never said that it’s equal to what our eyes see
@@doriyancoleman I know, I was paraphrasing. You said “35mm feels familiar to look through since it’s so close to what our eyes naturally see”. And that’s what confuses me. In what way is 35mm close to what our eyes see? I’m not trying to argue with you, I’m just trying to understand why photographers say things like that. It’s always confused me. My experience of my own sight is not something I’ve been able to see with any lens even the widest ones.