Wow dude, you are an impressive fellow! How refreshing it is to see complicated information digested and dispersed so eloquently. Bravo to you sir! I just happily subscribed and look forward to more of your content. Have a great day and thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Admiralty is irrelevant unless you’re in a boat. That’s the short answer. It’s a bunch of overlapping international laws that handle treasure, piracy, titles between ports, and damage to boats in the ocean. That’s about it.
@ not true, we are under it on the land. Courts operate on it. Goes back to Rome. The legalese language is everywhere. Look at the “birth certificate” birth is the term for ships as well. “Canal” the baby comes through the birth canal. The ship comes through the canal. There is a lot to it but you should check it.
@@RolsRoyce3yes your right. For some reason many who go to law school don’t see that we are under admiralty. I believe that is because those that are in power only want them to know what the powers at be want them to know. You can’t tell me our flag that has golden fringes and are in the police stations and courts and it’s not admiralty. It’s an indicator it’s been capture and subject to maritime law hence why the people are subject to statues. All hospitals are considered ship on dry docks. That is why we are considered younglings. Youngling is a term that means to abandoned or to be an orphan. Our Birth Certificate is a surety bond. The term birth means to abandoned and certificate means to own someone else. Did you know a birth certificate indicates that we have been adopted by our mother and the State comes in and adopts us through Parens Patrie. The reason why we have these is because in 1933 the elite bankers bankrupt the United States and the treasonous FDR under executive order confiscated all gold and silver from the people there was no lawful money in the system. So the United States surrendered our land, cattle and us to the elites. The elites had to make it in a way that it wasn’t obvious to us so they use the Birth Certificate and tricked our mothers in surrendering the name. Our name gets registered as a corporation and it becomes all caps. They attach the NAME to our bodies and from that point on we are their property and we lose our rights.
Juries decide questions of fact. Not law. They review evidence and determine which evidence is more believable. But the functions of the finder of facts and finder of law are very different.
@@brynoDC You are dead wrong. Read the founders of our Constitution and our early history. Juries were always tasked with judging the law as well as the facts.
Confusing case law and common law is a very essence of the problems we face today. Common law is not declarative and thus mutable by judges. Judges must read the law rather than make the law.
Case law is common law. A common law system uses controlling case law to determine its decisions, although there is some nuance to how it uses cases vs. statutes. I’m trying to start with the broader concepts and move into the more specific. By contrast a civil law jurisdiction, like France, uses a more complex civil code in place of a common law and judges opinions carry less legal weight.
I am sorry to see you go. I have, and will continue in good faith, to teach what I have been taught and learned through experience in law school and as a lawyer because I think more people should know this information than just lawyers. Perhaps you have been taught something different. I can only speak to my own experience, education, and research, but these are not insignificant and perhaps should not be so easily discounted. I can and will make mistakes. The other day I said 2/3 majority was required to ratify a constitutional amendment when it was 3/4. Mistakes will happen and it’s hard to correct a video unfortunately aside from in the comments (which I did repeatedly). But I will not intentionally mislead based on what I have been taught, read, and experienced as an attorney. I have better things to do with my time. My only goal is to impart what I have learned and what we as attorneys are taught.
Wow dude, you are an impressive fellow!
How refreshing it is to see complicated information digested and dispersed so eloquently.
Bravo to you sir!
I just happily subscribed and look forward to more of your content.
Have a great day and thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Thank you so much!!
Ok let’s do admiralty maritime now
Admiralty is irrelevant unless you’re in a boat. That’s the short answer. It’s a bunch of overlapping international laws that handle treasure, piracy, titles between ports, and damage to boats in the ocean. That’s about it.
@ not true, we are under it on the land. Courts operate on it. Goes back to Rome. The legalese language is everywhere. Look at the “birth certificate” birth is the term for ships as well. “Canal” the baby comes through the birth canal. The ship comes through the canal. There is a lot to it but you should check it.
@@RolsRoyce3Jordan Maxwell the late friend of Manly P. Hall taught about this over his lifetime.
@@RolsRoyce3yes your right. For some reason many who go to law school don’t see that we are under admiralty. I believe that is because those that are in power only want them to know what the powers at be want them to know. You can’t tell me our flag that has golden fringes and are in the police stations and courts and it’s not admiralty. It’s an indicator it’s been capture and subject to maritime law hence why the people are subject to statues. All hospitals are considered ship on dry docks. That is why we are considered younglings. Youngling is a term that means to abandoned or to be an orphan. Our Birth Certificate is a surety bond. The term birth means to abandoned and certificate means to own someone else. Did you know a birth certificate indicates that we have been adopted by our mother and the State comes in and adopts us through Parens Patrie. The reason why we have these is because in 1933 the elite bankers bankrupt the United States and the treasonous FDR under executive order confiscated all gold and silver from the people there was no lawful money in the system. So the United States surrendered our land, cattle and us to the elites. The elites had to make it in a way that it wasn’t obvious to us so they use the Birth Certificate and tricked our mothers in surrendering the name. Our name gets registered as a corporation and it becomes all caps. They attach the NAME to our bodies and from that point on we are their property and we lose our rights.
@ yes my friend
No Judge should have the power to rule. Juries for every case are what we need.
Juries decide questions of fact. Not law. They review evidence and determine which evidence is more believable. But the functions of the finder of facts and finder of law are very different.
@@brynoDC You are dead wrong. Read the founders of our Constitution and our early history. Juries were always tasked with judging the law as well as the facts.
Great videos
Wow, Louisiana and quebec! Dang. Thank you!
Confusing case law and common law is a very essence of the problems we face today. Common law is not declarative and thus mutable by judges. Judges must read the law rather than make the law.
Case law is common law. A common law system uses controlling case law to determine its decisions, although there is some nuance to how it uses cases vs. statutes. I’m trying to start with the broader concepts and move into the more specific. By contrast a civil law jurisdiction, like France, uses a more complex civil code in place of a common law and judges opinions carry less legal weight.
@brynoDC perhaps you should check the Black's Law Dictionary 4th ed page 345.
Why aren’t you a law professor?
so in short case laws are and can be common laws ???
Public law-nica 😅
I will have to unsubscribe on this one……
I am sorry to see you go. I have, and will continue in good faith, to teach what I have been taught and learned through experience in law school and as a lawyer because I think more people should know this information than just lawyers. Perhaps you have been taught something different. I can only speak to my own experience, education, and research, but these are not insignificant and perhaps should not be so easily discounted. I can and will make mistakes. The other day I said 2/3 majority was required to ratify a constitutional amendment when it was 3/4. Mistakes will happen and it’s hard to correct a video unfortunately aside from in the comments (which I did repeatedly). But I will not intentionally mislead based on what I have been taught, read, and experienced as an attorney. I have better things to do with my time. My only goal is to impart what I have learned and what we as attorneys are taught.