But you must be persistent and patient. While understanding Kant can be a heavy lift, persistence will richly reward your efforts. It will deepen and broaden your mind
Will have to start reading his work, this programme should be available in schools to introduce the ideas and ideals of reason, thought and learning, especially tolerance. Thank you for reintroducing Kant to me as he is briefly touched on in sociology and psychology.
Great thought-provoking breakdown of Kant, his life, his times, and his ideas many of which are very worth contemplating and applying today. Thank you, Sabine and Aya.
Had Emmanuel Kant lived today he would have likely said "Mainstream media such as DW have taken away the inherent right of the people to think for themselves". 😅
Yeah but Wittgenstein would have told Kant to shove it before this time also. Heck Kierkegaard would have destroyed Kant’s categorical imperative before Wittgenstein.
But think more critically on this, they aren’t taking any rights, they are merely encouraging you to think on your own as Kant would have. If you swallow information without reflection, perhaps you are not thinking about it, but you always will have the ability to think about it for yourself, even if someone took away all your rights, they cannot take your thoughts
Previously a college student and a concrete worker, I was aiming at a double major in philosophy and psychology to stay afloat. Along this path, I accomplished a scholarship and fell in love with other schools of thought -sociology, and physiology, to name a few. However, I now see things like a "school-to-prison pipeline" and how one's acquisition can affect an individual's aspiration, which takes a toll. I would fill pages in a moleskin and be an avid hiker and reader-having read Kierkegaard and Kant as well as Camus and Nietzsche. Though I plan to still fulfill an education in these disciplines, I now see a skeptical growth as I'm left with the tertiary question of "if it cannot make money, is it worth it?"
It's inspiring to see how his ideas about thinking for ourselves and global interconnectedness are still so relevant today! In Seogwipo, Korea's southernmost small city without a university, a lecture on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is being held for citizens to commemorate the 300th anniversary of his birth by Jeju City Lifelong Education Center.
I agree. I admire Kant's ideas and think they are extremely pertinent to our lives today. I am happy to know that Jeju City Lifelong Education Center is celebrating his life and work.
@@baehongkim952 It’s wonderful to hear that even in smaller cities like Seogwipo, there’s a strong commitment to lifelong learning and engagement with profound philosophical ideas like Kant’s. The fact that a lecture on "Critique of Pure Reason" is being held for the public shows how timeless and relevant Kant’s work remains, especially in our increasingly interconnected world. It's truly inspiring to see how communities continue to honor and explore such significant contributions to human thought.
It’s wonderful to hear that even in smaller cities like Seogwipo, there’s a strong commitment to lifelong learning and engagement with profound philosophical ideas like Kant’s. The fact that a lecture on "Critique of Pure Reason" is being held for the public shows how timeless and relevant Kant’s work remains, especially in our increasingly interconnected world. It's truly inspiring to see how communities continue to honor and explore such significant contributions to human thought.
@@kinnyclaire7332 it is fine to present Kant but what about eastern philosophy which has a lot more profundity as it does not surreptitiously present theology in the garb of secularism
I'm one of the four Kant scholars featured in this video. Now I regret that I agreed to do the interview: I feel as though I was being used as a token, a mouthpiece to talk about Kant's racist views only to have these dismissed as merely "peripheral" parts of Kant's system that are and should ultimately be crowded out by the supposed "core" of that system (this is the standard but rarely critically reflected move that people make to evade the topic of Kant's racism). In my extensive conversation with the DW journalist who interviewed me, as well as in my book Kant, Race, and Racism (OUP 2023), I explained at pains why there is NO CONTRADICTION between Kant's moral universalism and his racist worldview: his extremely complex and sophisticated philosophical system is capacious enough to accommodate BOTH. But the video doesn't even mention that part of my interview. I understand that the journalists who made this video had to make editorial decisions about what to include and what to exclude. But the agenda here is problematic: I get the impression that it's intended overall to glorify Kant and keep him on the pedestal exactly as he has always stood, so that whatever blemish that's superficially mentioned in passing gets completely overshadowed--and supposedly overcome--by the good parts of his philosophy. By the way, and this is important, here is the exact version of Kant's Formula of Humanity: “So act that you use HUMANITY, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." In the video, Susan Neiman turned this into a command to treat other HUMAN BEINGS as ends in themselves. This is a misrepresentation of the formula. There is an important conceptual difference between "humanity" (in abstracto) and "human being" (in concreto) for Kant, especially as it pertains to his pure moral philosophy. I won't bore anyone with details here. For those who are interested, you may consult my late advisor Henry Allison's Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary (OUP 2011). Understanding that conceptual difference is also key to understanding WHY there is no contradiction between the teachings of Kant's pure moral philosophy and his racist worldview. I talk about this in the very first chapter of my book.
Thanks so much for your clarification @haupinglu-adler8697. I am very exctied to check out your recommendations. As a young philosophy student of Africa descent I, find your extended discussion extremely helpful. I am tired of the way many important thinker´s racism is pushed aside as if it is not a fundamental part of their thought. Luckily, I went to a university where we were able to have a more complex conversation about his ideas which brought greater insight into the racism of European Enlightenment in general. These conversations centered around the how the growing trans-Atlantic slave trade may have impacted their views. A concrete example of this racism is the ways in which Afro-German Enlightenment philosopher Anton Wilhelm Amo was erased from pantheon of German Enlightenement philosophers. Kant would have known of Amo and his work, it was widely regarded in his time only to be erased when his presence presented a contradiction to the racism other Enlightenment thinkers defended.
We regret that you find yourself misunderstood in our video. We make serious efforts to accurately reflect the positions of our interlocutors. Despite all care, misunderstandings can never be completely ruled out. However, we do not fully understand your reproach. In a video intended to give an insight into Kant's philosophy to an audience who is not supposed to have any in-depth philosophical knowledge, we found it quite complicated to present the aspect you are missing. As journalists, we are obliged to present different opinions on controversial topics. For this reason, we have also presented a contrasting statement from another Kant scholar. Furthermore, we correctly mentioned that the assessment of Kant's racist statements is controversial among Kant scholars. We found your explanations of Kant's disturbing comments about the alleged "races" and their supposedly different moral and cultural abilities so important, impressive and clear that we decided to feature them in our video. We hope that our decision is understandable.
Hello. My area is also in Philosophy. I am not a Kant scholar, but Kant has had a great influence in my thinking since I was first introduced as an undergraduate to his thought by German philosopher in Baltimore. I would like to know more how you handle the issue of Kant's universalism and his ideas on race. I will be looking for your book.
9 месяцев назад+10
This is a 16-minute informational video for the general public. Your research holds a significant place and relative importance, though it's debatable how much weight it carries. The video seems to reflect this well, in a balanced manner. Kind regards.
So take your time, rest when you need to. Step back, observe and consider. It is not reason that humanises, but the application of reason to ethical questions arising from observed contradictions between our convictions and our behaviours. We can be convinced our work serves peace, equating peace with our personal comforts and freedom and that of our agreeable friends, while that pursuit of our own elbow-room jams an elbow into the space and prosperity of multitudes. I'm thinking of those CEO's serving their shareholders in the peace of their boardrooms as their keystrokes facilitate genocidal famines and di$p£ac€d populations, but hey, I've a reservation for dinner at the Ritz after a hard days work in my penthouse. Those suckers are just drowning loosers. Such are the collective mindsets we confront...sophisticated rationalisations of primitive instincts of ego. Fatigue, like pain, is a feedback signal to be heeded and attended to. Do not overload yourself. Know yourself, man, (Google attributes it to Socrates). Nobody has a tape of Socrates's answer to Google.
Thank you for this excellent presentation. Unfortunately today there is as much, if not more, challenge to "thinking for one's self". I don't see any, or not much, evidence of any authority persons/figures encouraging people to think for themselves. What struck me in particular was the fact that notwithstanding his high intellect and reasoning ability, the hidden influential authority of some contempary societal 'norms' or 'beliefs' escaped his scrutiny.
If you think that you have found an inconsistency in Kant between his claims regarding race and his claims regarding freedom/morality, I suggest that you probably have an incomplete understanding of his work. On this point, it also helps to remember that Kant was, in large part, dependent upon others for his information regarding other cultures. He was apparently an avid reader of travel literature.
" I am reminded of a great German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. He is a specimen of those people who are absolutely in the mind. He lived according to mind so totally that people used to set their watches, whenever they saw Immanuel Kant going to the university. Never - it may rain, it may rain fire, it may rain cats and dogs, it may be utterly cold, snow falling … Whatever the situation, Kant will reach the university at exactly the same time all the year round, even on holidays. Such a fixed, almost mechanical … He would go on holiday at exactly the same time, remain in the university library, which was specially kept open for him, because otherwise what would he do there the whole day? And he was a very prominent, well-known philosopher, and he would leave the university at exactly the same time every day. One day it happened … It had rained and there was too much mud on the way - one of his shoes got stuck in the mud. He did not stop to take the shoe out because that would make him reach the university a few seconds later, and that was impossible. He left the shoe there. He just arrived with one shoe. The students could not believe it. Somebody asked, “What happened to the other shoe?” He said, “It got stuck in the mud, so I left it there, knowing perfectly well nobody is going to steal one shoe. When I return in the evening, then I will pick it up. But I could not have been late.” A woman proposed to him: “I want to be married to you” - a beautiful young woman. Perhaps no woman has ever received such an answer, before or after Immanuel Kant. Either you say, “Yes,” or you say, “No. Excuse me.” Immanuel Kant said, “I will have to do a great deal of research.” The woman asked, “About what?” He said, “I will have to look in all the marriage manuals, all the books concerning marriage, and find out all the pros and cons - whether to marry or not to marry.” The woman could not imagine that this kind of answer had ever been given to any woman before. Even no is acceptable, even yes, although you are getting into a misery, but it is acceptable. But this kind of indifferent attitude towards the woman - he did not say a single sweet word to her. He did not say anything about her beauty, his whole concern was his mind. He had to convince his mind whether or not marriage is logically the right thing. It took him three years. It was really a long search. Day and night he was working on it, and he had found three hundred reasons against marriage and three hundred reasons for marriage. So the problem even after three years was the same. One friend suggested out of compassion, “You wasted three years on this stupid research. In three years you would have experienced all these six hundred, without any research. You should have just said yes to that woman. There was no need to do so much hard work. Three years would have given you all the pros and cons - existentially, experientially.” But Kant said, “I am in a fix. Both are equal, parallel, balanced. There is no way to choose.” The friend suggested, “Of the pros you have forgotten one thing: that whenever there is a chance, it is better to say yes and go through the experience. That is one thing more in favor of the pros. The cons cannot give you any experience, and only experience has any validity.” He understood, it was intellectually right. He immediately went to the woman’s house, knocked on her door. Her old father opened the door and said, “Young man, you are too late. You took too long in your research. My girl is married and has two children.” That was the last thing that was ever heard about his marriage. From then on no woman ever asked him, and he was not the kind of man to ask anybody. He remained unmarried."
When I think about what he said at the end, Kant thought in a way that was consistent and in line with what he said at the beginning. What I take from this is the importance of moderation. The second thing I take from this is that the development of each individual's thought is a journey. This requires a determination to continue to seek the truth without fear of contradicting what you say, and to know in order to know (Sapere aude). Finally, I realize that there is not much difference between what Kant said in those days and today.
الانظمه هي التي تخلق ثقافه اجتماعيه لتغذي طبقتها ووجودها وتطور نفسها واليات طرق التأثير بالوعي الاجتماعي بحيث تجعل الفرد يتكيف لاشعوريا وفق ايدلوجيتها وخصوصا بعد اكتشاف علم النفس وجيشه من محللين ومحللات نفسيين تابعين للنظام السلطوي ومؤسساته ودورهم في التأثير الاجتماعي الداخلي والخارجي والتلاعب بالميول الاجتماعي وثقافته وفق خليط وتوازن، لهذا تعتبر المعرفه مهمه لفهم الواقع الذي ابتزته الانظمه بأساليبها النفسيه وغير.. في خلق معنى وهدف وقيمه للانسان، وايضا مع المعرفه يمكن احتواء نقاط ضعف العقل وثغراته التي يراهن عليها طبقه طفيليه سلطويه وتابعيهم.
While the existence of God cannot be proved or disproved through empirical means, according to Kant, belief in God is necessary for his ethical model to function effectively and for moral principles to have meaning and significance.
This idea would be true deemed as truth by individuals who believe in a vengeful God so profoundly that they entirely lack a sense of empathy or objectivity; the ability to separate themselves from their religious beliefs; hypothetical suspension of belief that the only thing keeping humans from being abject monsters is this unwavering fear of eternal punishment in the afterlife. There is nothing that ostensibly proves that Kant’s philosophy cannot be followed, or does not hold true without faith or religiosity. An individual absolutely can. Kant was quite familiar with objectivity, and he consciously applied it to his philosophy when he created his ethical litmus test of determining whether actions taken for themselves or others were a means or an end. No requisite of faith required. A sense of faith is almost never the issue taken up with atheists and agnostics, it’s the coercion of organized religion that they take issue with. To argue that something cannot exist or speak truth to power at all without the existence of God like it would seem you’re implying is that coercion manifested.
KUDOS! Yes, Kant is totally relevant today. Also, I believe he did recant his racist views later in life. In any case, overall I think he was one of the greatest philosophers of all time. Thanks for your work on this piece. Kant will be in my fourth book, which I'm just now starting. Happy Trails
He got that one from somewhere, hasn't he.😆☝️ 7:56 Doing nothing from selfish ambition or vain glory, but with humility of mind regarding one another as more important than yourselves, not merely looking out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others. Have this way of thinking in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus" -Philippians 2:3-5 LSB
Yes, a philosopher of morality in his case is found to be not quite above the moral prejudices of his time and living inconsistently with some basic principles (such as ''universality'') of his own moral philosophy! Components of Kant's moral philosophy (also of some others before him), such as the ''golden rule'', still have relevance as a maxim today. (Perhaps, his critique of metaphysics plus components of his epistemology are of more interest for the contemporary world.)
I agree with Kant. But the man who says Russia cancels it's treaties needs a kit of reading to see how many treaties the west either refused to ratify, cancelled or simply violated...Vis a vis the ones that Russia/USSR has cancelled or violated or cancelled. Russia declared it's change in strategy in 2008, when the west could simply not be trusted anymore as the facilitator of justice. The west wanted it all and cared not about the interests of other countries.
Remember - Kant disavows the Church during his time & where he was raised, lived. I believe from my findings that he would most likely really appreciate American constitutional freedoms (founded in Christian principles). Additionally - anyone here online, in interviews, etc.: you really gotta ask them if they could comment on the following: • Kant's links to Platonism - he shifted from it in his writings at least twice (or is known to have) • How many have MISREAD Kant If scholars are commenting on Kant without the two bullet points I've listed here, then you can detect them and/or take them to task.
Its weird watching this. Like the segment at the end about world citizenship - its like the guy didnt hear himself say "if they are welcome." I think its really strange that Kant is still so strongly embraced when so much of his work conflated ideals for phenomena. Granted, now we have game theory, system dynamics, and economics, on top of psychology. People dont typically wake up and say "how can I benefit at the expense of someone I dont like." People do try to act in their own best interests with their limited information, biases and shifting priorities. At the end of the day, Bernie Sanders may have thought more about ethics, but Lucky Palmer might already have more influence to shape international policy. We need to be aware of the incredibly powerful systems that exist; the most influential people become experts in navigating those systems, not dying on the hills of ideals. What I dont get is why Kant is embraced so much even now. Germany is still trying to get out of 1880s but cant get away from enlightenment nostalgia. The absence of any strong, sensible, voice thats not overly apologetic for simply existing, or fancifully idealistic, created the power vacuum for the AfD. Yeah, utopias are nice, but most people work a job to feed their family and dont understand why people spend so much time debating utopias and resent the result - policy rooted more in ideals than reality; see: failing EU agriculture. See: how fast people reject socialism when they want more of whats being given to people that no longer look as similar.
My own philosophical orientation is in the area of what is sometimes called "continental philosophy.' That philosophical tradition would be severely impoverished without the work of Immanuel Kant.
Let's avoid "Presentism" and take the timeless ideas from past thinkers, but also recognize that they were products of their time and may have had flawed thinking.
Kant could be the author or maybe the image of German behavior. Obey laws at any price. That is what he preaches with his imperative categories and what we have seen during WWII....
At his day there's no sharp distinctions between science and philosophy- whats considered speculative and fundamental but rigorous and systematic is basically philosophy, whereas anything that tries to apply it to the study of nature is called natural philosophy. Philosophy also at his time is a bundle of different necessary set of skills and field of study consisting diverse domain of knowledge such as logic, mathematics, physics, metaphysics and even theology. Kant exhibit applausable knowledge and even expertise to such diverse domain of knowledge: to Newtonian physics, protestant theological doctrine, politics, philosophy, logic, ethics and astronomy. Until now you can see from the "Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers" an article of Kant's contribution to cosmology on his "Nebular hypothesis."
His views on India looks like real...red race is not modernizing their thoughts... We stuck with culture of thousands of years ago Still In my thinking about religion mostly..
No one is perfect, and hence we shouldn't idolize anybody regardless of his/her achievements. Interesting to me though, the racists or supremacists of the day, at one time or another, were considered bararians, savages, non-cultured or generally inferior, by other tribes/peoples/races. Human spirits are dynamic, everyone, every nation, all have the potential to become dominant in the forseeable future. On a personal level, we should learn from each other, regardless the differences in beliefs, status, knowledge, cultural backgrounds.
The Left have forgotten the root thought of Kant. Tribalism and identity politics ie acceptance of archaic culture without critical analysis has defined the Left for 3 decades now. I was always shocked about his views on race though. It seemed so in conflict with his basic ideas. It's so depressing thinking how far off course the left have gone now.
Лежат, пусть и дальше лежат": ЕС просят не трогать замороженные активы России - СМИ 04.04.24, 08:11 617 Китай, Саудовская Аравия и Индонезия пытаются убедить Евросоюз не передавать эти деньги на нужды Украины. И Ирана
You still might not disagree with Kants’ racist theories and ideas. The Western European ideology is overwhelmingly dominant in our mother Africa and it’s shocking to know that there is a big number of our people that think that they are less inferior in terms of reason as compared to the other races. Very interesting. Probably a topic that will never be exhausted with today’s influence of cancel culture and race debates.
Good documentary, until the "racist" end. He was a racist, like we all are. Because there ARE differences between the races. Something we should celebrate, and not be condemned for saying out loud. Like the difference between women and men. Hurray and amen.
Knowing he was a racist in the worst sense along with his disregard for woman makes revisiting his work a necessary evil. He surely didn't "Sapere Aude" when it came to these & others.
It’s ironic , Kant also believed that the colonials in America had the right to eliminate the inferior native population. he believed enlightenment for white people.
Saw this in my feed. Sorry, but who are DW to lecture me on using my brain? 😂Preposterous. If I'd ever seen DW using its own brains effectively, I'd hear them out. But I haven't and I won't. So TTFN.
Very insightful and quite balanced video. Thank you Aya and Sabine.
This is a good introduction to some of Kant's ideas, if you want to know more then the best place to go next would be his books!
So glad you liked it!
But you must be persistent and patient. While understanding Kant can be a heavy lift, persistence will richly reward your efforts. It will deepen and broaden your mind
@@SagesseNoir - Yes persistence and patience on the assumption that something will 'emerge' - Maybe like searching for a treasure ?
His best book? Recommendations please
Will have to start reading his work, this programme should be available in schools to introduce the ideas and ideals of reason, thought and learning, especially tolerance. Thank you for reintroducing Kant to me as he is briefly touched on in sociology and psychology.
Thanks for your comment! We're glad you liked the video.
I am happy to hear that you will study Kant. It will enrich you intellectually.
Great thought-provoking breakdown of Kant, his life, his times, and his ideas many of which are very worth contemplating and applying today. Thank you, Sabine and Aya.
☺
How we are applying today, if humanity of 21 century admits Russian genocide and destruction of Ukrainian people???
Had Emmanuel Kant lived today he would have likely said "Mainstream media such as DW have taken away the inherent right of the people to think for themselves". 😅
Nothing can take away your right to think for yourself unless you give it up yourself.
Yeah but Wittgenstein would have told Kant to shove it before this time also. Heck Kierkegaard would have destroyed Kant’s categorical imperative before Wittgenstein.
❤
@@IAmWhatIAm7573 viva
But think more critically on this, they aren’t taking any rights, they are merely encouraging you to think on your own as Kant would have. If you swallow information without reflection, perhaps you are not thinking about it, but you always will have the ability to think about it for yourself, even if someone took away all your rights, they cannot take your thoughts
Previously a college student and a concrete worker, I was aiming at a double major in philosophy and psychology to stay afloat. Along this path, I accomplished a scholarship and fell in love with other schools of thought -sociology, and physiology, to name a few.
However, I now see things like a "school-to-prison pipeline" and how one's acquisition can affect an individual's aspiration, which takes a toll. I would fill pages in a moleskin and be an avid hiker and reader-having read Kierkegaard and Kant as well as Camus and Nietzsche. Though I plan to still fulfill an education in these disciplines, I now see a skeptical growth as I'm left with the tertiary question of "if it cannot make money, is it worth it?"
It's inspiring to see how his ideas about thinking for ourselves and global interconnectedness are still so relevant today!
In Seogwipo, Korea's southernmost small city without a university, a lecture on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is being held for citizens to commemorate the 300th anniversary of his birth by Jeju City Lifelong Education Center.
I agree. I admire Kant's ideas and think they are extremely pertinent to our lives today. I am happy to know that Jeju City Lifelong Education Center is celebrating his life and work.
@@baehongkim952 It’s wonderful to hear that even in smaller cities like Seogwipo, there’s a strong commitment to lifelong learning and engagement with profound philosophical ideas like Kant’s. The fact that a lecture on "Critique of Pure Reason" is being held for the public shows how timeless and relevant Kant’s work remains, especially in our increasingly interconnected world. It's truly inspiring to see how communities continue to honor and explore such significant contributions to human thought.
It’s wonderful to hear that even in smaller cities like Seogwipo, there’s a strong commitment to lifelong learning and engagement with profound philosophical ideas like Kant’s. The fact that a lecture on "Critique of Pure Reason" is being held for the public shows how timeless and relevant Kant’s work remains, especially in our increasingly interconnected world. It's truly inspiring to see how communities continue to honor and explore such significant contributions to human thought.
@@kinnyclaire7332 it is fine to present Kant but what about eastern philosophy which has a lot more profundity as it does not surreptitiously present theology in the garb of secularism
DW, great work👍👍👍👍
You should make channel
for philosphy loving people
also.
I'm one of the four Kant scholars featured in this video. Now I regret that I agreed to do the interview: I feel as though I was being used as a token, a mouthpiece to talk about Kant's racist views only to have these dismissed as merely "peripheral" parts of Kant's system that are and should ultimately be crowded out by the supposed "core" of that system (this is the standard but rarely critically reflected move that people make to evade the topic of Kant's racism). In my extensive conversation with the DW journalist who interviewed me, as well as in my book Kant, Race, and Racism (OUP 2023), I explained at pains why there is NO CONTRADICTION between Kant's moral universalism and his racist worldview: his extremely complex and sophisticated philosophical system is capacious enough to accommodate BOTH. But the video doesn't even mention that part of my interview.
I understand that the journalists who made this video had to make editorial decisions about what to include and what to exclude. But the agenda here is problematic: I get the impression that it's intended overall to glorify Kant and keep him on the pedestal exactly as he has always stood, so that whatever blemish that's superficially mentioned in passing gets completely overshadowed--and supposedly overcome--by the good parts of his philosophy.
By the way, and this is important, here is the exact version of Kant's Formula of Humanity: “So act that you use HUMANITY, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." In the video, Susan Neiman turned this into a command to treat other HUMAN BEINGS as ends in themselves. This is a misrepresentation of the formula. There is an important conceptual difference between "humanity" (in abstracto) and "human being" (in concreto) for Kant, especially as it pertains to his pure moral philosophy. I won't bore anyone with details here. For those who are interested, you may consult my late advisor Henry Allison's Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary (OUP 2011). Understanding that conceptual difference is also key to understanding WHY there is no contradiction between the teachings of Kant's pure moral philosophy and his racist worldview. I talk about this in the very first chapter of my book.
Thanks so much for your clarification @haupinglu-adler8697. I am very exctied to check out your recommendations. As a young philosophy student of Africa descent I, find your extended discussion extremely helpful. I am tired of the way many important thinker´s racism is pushed aside as if it is not a fundamental part of their thought. Luckily, I went to a university where we were able to have a more complex conversation about his ideas which brought greater insight into the racism of European Enlightenment in general. These conversations centered around the how the growing trans-Atlantic slave trade may have impacted their views. A concrete example of this racism is the ways in which Afro-German Enlightenment philosopher Anton Wilhelm Amo was erased from pantheon of German Enlightenement philosophers. Kant would have known of Amo and his work, it was widely regarded in his time only to be erased when his presence presented a contradiction to the racism other Enlightenment thinkers defended.
We regret that you find yourself misunderstood in our video. We make serious efforts to accurately reflect the positions of our interlocutors. Despite all care, misunderstandings can never be completely ruled out.
However, we do not fully understand your reproach. In a video intended to give an insight into Kant's philosophy to an audience who is not supposed to have any in-depth philosophical knowledge, we found it quite complicated to present the aspect you are missing.
As journalists, we are obliged to present different opinions on controversial topics. For this reason, we have also presented a contrasting statement from another Kant scholar. Furthermore, we correctly mentioned that the assessment of Kant's racist statements is controversial among Kant scholars.
We found your explanations of Kant's disturbing comments about the alleged "races" and their supposedly different moral and cultural abilities so important, impressive and clear that we decided to feature them in our video. We hope that our decision is understandable.
Hello. My area is also in Philosophy. I am not a Kant scholar, but Kant has had a great influence in my thinking since I was first introduced as an undergraduate to his thought by German philosopher in Baltimore. I would like to know more how you handle the issue of Kant's universalism and his ideas on race. I will be looking for your book.
This is a 16-minute informational video for the general public. Your research holds a significant place and relative importance, though it's debatable how much weight it carries. The video seems to reflect this well, in a balanced manner. Kind regards.
thank you for you explanation. i totally got your point. and i want to read your book too.
It's not just cowardice. It's also just fatigue.
So take your time, rest when you need to. Step back, observe and consider.
It is not reason that humanises, but the application of reason to ethical questions arising from observed contradictions between our convictions and our behaviours.
We can be convinced our work serves peace, equating peace with our personal comforts and freedom and that of our agreeable friends, while that pursuit of our own elbow-room jams an elbow into the space and prosperity of multitudes.
I'm thinking of those CEO's serving their shareholders in the peace of their boardrooms as their keystrokes facilitate genocidal famines and di$p£ac€d populations, but hey, I've a reservation for dinner at the Ritz after a hard days work in my penthouse.
Those suckers are just drowning loosers.
Such are the collective mindsets we confront...sophisticated rationalisations of primitive instincts of ego.
Fatigue, like pain, is a feedback signal to be heeded and attended to. Do not overload yourself. Know yourself, man, (Google attributes it to Socrates). Nobody has a tape of Socrates's answer to Google.
Pathetic
Thank you for this excellent presentation. Unfortunately today there is as much, if not more, challenge to "thinking for one's self". I don't see any, or not much, evidence of any authority persons/figures encouraging people to think for themselves.
What struck me in particular was the fact that notwithstanding his high intellect and reasoning ability, the hidden influential authority of some contempary societal 'norms' or 'beliefs' escaped his scrutiny.
Thanks for sharing your perspective on Kant with us and our community!
In gratitude to have this, thanks DW!❤
😊Thanks ✌️👍😊Kant was a superstar philosopher 🌹❤️Awesome video 📝📚🌍
If you think that you have found an inconsistency in Kant between his claims regarding race and his claims regarding freedom/morality, I suggest that you probably have an incomplete understanding of his work. On this point, it also helps to remember that Kant was, in large part, dependent upon others for his information regarding other cultures. He was apparently an avid reader of travel literature.
" I am reminded of a great German philosopher, Immanuel Kant. He is a specimen of those people who are absolutely in the mind. He lived according to mind so totally that people used to set their watches, whenever they saw Immanuel Kant going to the university. Never - it may rain, it may rain fire, it may rain cats and dogs, it may be utterly cold, snow falling … Whatever the situation, Kant will reach the university at exactly the same time all the year round, even on holidays. Such a fixed, almost mechanical … He would go on holiday at exactly the same time, remain in the university library, which was specially kept open for him, because otherwise what would he do there the whole day? And he was a very prominent, well-known philosopher, and he would leave the university at exactly the same time every day.
One day it happened … It had rained and there was too much mud on the way - one of his shoes got stuck in the mud. He did not stop to take the shoe out because that would make him reach the university a few seconds later, and that was impossible. He left the shoe there. He just arrived with one shoe. The students could not believe it. Somebody asked, “What happened to the other shoe?”
He said, “It got stuck in the mud, so I left it there, knowing perfectly well nobody is going to steal one shoe. When I return in the evening, then I will pick it up. But I could not have been late.”
A woman proposed to him: “I want to be married to you” - a beautiful young woman. Perhaps no woman has ever received such an answer, before or after Immanuel Kant. Either you say, “Yes,” or you say, “No. Excuse me.” Immanuel Kant said, “I will have to do a great deal of research.”
The woman asked, “About what?”
He said, “I will have to look in all the marriage manuals, all the books concerning marriage, and find out all the pros and cons - whether to marry or not to marry.”
The woman could not imagine that this kind of answer had ever been given to any woman before. Even no is acceptable, even yes, although you are getting into a misery, but it is acceptable. But this kind of indifferent attitude towards the woman - he did not say a single sweet word to her. He did not say anything about her beauty, his whole concern was his mind. He had to convince his mind whether or not marriage is logically the right thing.
It took him three years. It was really a long search. Day and night he was working on it, and he had found three hundred reasons against marriage and three hundred reasons for marriage. So the problem even after three years was the same.
One friend suggested out of compassion, “You wasted three years on this stupid research. In three years you would have experienced all these six hundred, without any research. You should have just said yes to that woman. There was no need to do so much hard work. Three years would have given you all the pros and cons - existentially, experientially.”
But Kant said, “I am in a fix. Both are equal, parallel, balanced. There is no way to choose.”
The friend suggested, “Of the pros you have forgotten one thing: that whenever there is a chance, it is better to say yes and go through the experience. That is one thing more in favor of the pros. The cons cannot give you any experience, and only experience has any validity.”
He understood, it was intellectually right. He immediately went to the woman’s house, knocked on her door. Her old father opened the door and said, “Young man, you are too late. You took too long in your research. My girl is married and has two children.” That was the last thing that was ever heard about his marriage. From then on no woman ever asked him, and he was not the kind of man to ask anybody. He remained unmarried."
I think this is spoken by "Osho"
@@RRijesh yes
I believe that many of the philosophers were on the autistic spectrum, including Kant.
Thank You so much - so concise and important to know.
"And he wanted refugees to be taken in."
I wonder if he lived today in former Prussia now Germany!
a great thinker, thank you very much
Think, Critique of Reasons........ Opened the mind to think openly when at that time political legal system were worse.
When I think about what he said at the end, Kant thought in a way that was consistent and in line with what he said at the beginning. What I take from this is the importance of moderation. The second thing I take from this is that the development of each individual's thought is a journey. This requires a determination to continue to seek the truth without fear of contradicting what you say, and to know in order to know (Sapere aude). Finally, I realize that there is not much difference between what Kant said in those days and today.
Kindness to a fault sinks the lifeboat.
Sapere Aude: Dare To Know!! Kant's thoughts are just amazing.
DW, It's a great video. Thank you 😊
great video
Thanks for introducing me to kant, very relative to modern day world
Yes, reason is important to understand and know the world and people around us. Thanks , Team DW ❤
If Kant ever came back and saw how the media supresses free thought,he'd never stop vomiting.
Wow. It is great documentary.
Det kategoriska imperativet är fantastiskt.
الانظمه هي التي تخلق ثقافه اجتماعيه لتغذي طبقتها ووجودها وتطور نفسها واليات طرق التأثير بالوعي الاجتماعي بحيث تجعل الفرد يتكيف لاشعوريا وفق ايدلوجيتها وخصوصا بعد اكتشاف علم النفس وجيشه من محللين ومحللات نفسيين تابعين للنظام السلطوي ومؤسساته ودورهم في التأثير الاجتماعي الداخلي والخارجي والتلاعب بالميول الاجتماعي وثقافته وفق خليط وتوازن، لهذا تعتبر المعرفه مهمه لفهم الواقع الذي ابتزته الانظمه بأساليبها النفسيه وغير.. في خلق معنى وهدف وقيمه للانسان، وايضا مع المعرفه يمكن احتواء نقاط ضعف العقل وثغراته التي يراهن عليها طبقه طفيليه سلطويه وتابعيهم.
While the existence of God cannot be proved or disproved through empirical means, according to Kant, belief in God is necessary for his ethical model to function effectively and for moral principles to have meaning and significance.
Organized religion is antithetical to free thought.
YT algorithm busy deleting secular comments again I see.
That's why Kierkegaard's philosophy alligns with Kant
This idea would be true deemed as truth by individuals who believe in a vengeful God so profoundly that they entirely lack a sense of empathy or objectivity; the ability to separate themselves from their religious beliefs; hypothetical suspension of belief that the only thing keeping humans from being abject monsters is this unwavering fear of eternal punishment in the afterlife. There is nothing that ostensibly proves that Kant’s philosophy cannot be followed, or does not hold true without faith or religiosity. An individual absolutely can. Kant was quite familiar with objectivity, and he consciously applied it to his philosophy when he created his ethical litmus test of determining whether actions taken for themselves or others were a means or an end. No requisite of faith required. A sense of faith is almost never the issue taken up with atheists and agnostics, it’s the coercion of organized religion that they take issue with. To argue that something cannot exist or speak truth to power at all without the existence of God like it would seem you’re implying is that coercion manifested.
@@gurrenmed5319 both surreptitious theocrats
Watched all of it
KUDOS! Yes, Kant is totally relevant today. Also, I believe he did recant his racist views later in life. In any case, overall I think he was one of the greatest philosophers of all time. Thanks for your work on this piece. Kant will be in my fourth book, which I'm just now starting.
Happy Trails
Awareness is known by awareness alone.
He got that one from somewhere, hasn't he.😆☝️
7:56
Doing nothing from selfish ambition or vain glory, but with humility of mind regarding one another as more important than yourselves, not merely looking out for your own personal interests, but also for the interests of others. Have this way of thinking in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus" -Philippians 2:3-5 LSB
I’m pretty sure he didn’t say any of the stuff they said he did, except for “dare to know”!
Not a single mention of Transcendental Idealism? Did I miss it?
Without the 'critique of pure reason' what weight do the rest of his works even have?
Use your ambient ❤
What was important for Kant was reason, not only human reason, but the reason any agent must use to guide action.
This is pure BS. His reason never questioned his prejudices .he was a theocrat
Yes, a philosopher of morality in his case is found to be not quite above the moral prejudices of his time and living inconsistently with some basic principles (such as ''universality'') of his own moral philosophy!
Components of Kant's moral philosophy (also of some others before him), such as the ''golden rule'', still have relevance as a maxim today.
(Perhaps, his critique of metaphysics plus components of his epistemology are of more interest for the contemporary world.)
I agree with Kant. But the man who says Russia cancels it's treaties needs a kit of reading to see how many treaties the west either refused to ratify, cancelled or simply violated...Vis a vis the ones that Russia/USSR has cancelled or violated or cancelled. Russia declared it's change in strategy in 2008, when the west could simply not be trusted anymore as the facilitator of justice. The west wanted it all and cared not about the interests of other countries.
@@fabianabongo6284 Obviously, this man's "reason" in regard to Russia, was his inherited hatreded against Russia!
I tried to but I Kant.
Excelente video!
Glad you liked it. Make sure to follow for the latest uploads.
Honestly, his philosophy sounds pretty much like christian humanism without theism.
Kant's insights are imperishable
How about making one about Schiller? Sehr gut!
What’s the song at 10:43 ?
Remember - Kant disavows the Church during his time & where he was raised, lived. I believe from my findings that he would most likely really appreciate American constitutional freedoms (founded in Christian principles).
Additionally - anyone here online, in interviews, etc.: you really gotta ask them if they could comment on the following:
• Kant's links to Platonism - he shifted from it in his writings at least twice (or is known to have)
• How many have MISREAD Kant
If scholars are commenting on Kant without the two bullet points I've listed here, then you can detect them and/or take them to task.
So, Kant told us what we should think and how we should think it.
Achieving world peace would be insane
Its weird watching this. Like the segment at the end about world citizenship - its like the guy didnt hear himself say "if they are welcome." I think its really strange that Kant is still so strongly embraced when so much of his work conflated ideals for phenomena. Granted, now we have game theory, system dynamics, and economics, on top of psychology. People dont typically wake up and say "how can I benefit at the expense of someone I dont like." People do try to act in their own best interests with their limited information, biases and shifting priorities. At the end of the day, Bernie Sanders may have thought more about ethics, but Lucky Palmer might already have more influence to shape international policy. We need to be aware of the incredibly powerful systems that exist; the most influential people become experts in navigating those systems, not dying on the hills of ideals. What I dont get is why Kant is embraced so much even now. Germany is still trying to get out of 1880s but cant get away from enlightenment nostalgia. The absence of any strong, sensible, voice thats not overly apologetic for simply existing, or fancifully idealistic, created the power vacuum for the AfD. Yeah, utopias are nice, but most people work a job to feed their family and dont understand why people spend so much time debating utopias and resent the result - policy rooted more in ideals than reality; see: failing EU agriculture. See: how fast people reject socialism when they want more of whats being given to people that no longer look as similar.
My own philosophical orientation is in the area of what is sometimes called "continental philosophy.' That philosophical tradition would be severely impoverished without the work of Immanuel Kant.
Kant : Extra Terrestrial ... people of the Past and Future 👍
Only dw can do this superb content.
Could you translate and published in the Arctic DW
MY GOD FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AM HIS FOLLOWER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let's avoid "Presentism" and take the timeless ideas from past thinkers, but also recognize that they were products of their time and may have had flawed thinking.
Kant could be the author or maybe the image of German behavior. Obey laws at any price. That is what he preaches with his imperative categories and what we have seen during WWII....
His books are very complex. I don't understand almost anything in his philosophy
Im kant ask me
They said Immanuel Kant. He thought it quite unreasonable.
Okay! Maybe! I! Will! Try!
What did you call me?
At his day there's no sharp distinctions between science and philosophy- whats considered speculative and fundamental but rigorous and systematic is basically philosophy, whereas anything that tries to apply it to the study of nature is called natural philosophy.
Philosophy also at his time is a bundle of different necessary set of skills and field of study consisting diverse domain of knowledge such as logic, mathematics, physics, metaphysics and even theology.
Kant exhibit applausable knowledge and even expertise to such diverse domain of knowledge: to Newtonian physics, protestant theological doctrine, politics, philosophy, logic, ethics and astronomy. Until now you can see from the "Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers" an article of Kant's contribution to cosmology on his "Nebular hypothesis."
Why human beings are an enemy for one another?
😮
Why do folks get so much criticism for philosophizing about the armchair?
His views on India looks like real...red race is not modernizing their thoughts...
We stuck with culture of thousands of years ago
Still In my thinking about religion mostly..
No one is perfect, and hence we shouldn't idolize anybody regardless of his/her achievements. Interesting to me though, the racists or supremacists of the day, at one time or another, were considered bararians, savages, non-cultured or generally inferior, by other tribes/peoples/races. Human spirits are dynamic, everyone, every nation, all have the potential to become dominant in the forseeable future. On a personal level, we should learn from each other, regardless the differences in beliefs, status, knowledge, cultural backgrounds.
The Left have forgotten the root thought of Kant. Tribalism and identity politics ie acceptance of archaic culture without critical analysis has defined the Left for 3 decades now. I was always shocked about his views on race though. It seemed so in conflict with his basic ideas. It's so depressing thinking how far off course the left have gone now.
Kant's telling you you can!
He makes many demands, whilst saying freedom is the ultimate.
Enlightenment is why we are fooked, William Blake saw that
Karl Jaspers said that Immanuel Kant was Germany's greatest philosopher.
And now onto Hegel, and then Fichte. The Geist beckons!
Are you fine?
Quote: "that way of thinking is completely unacceptable".....but does not say it was wrong?????
DW really? A doco on Kant, while not using the words he wrote, only commentaries offered by the modern day fatuous ..
Political correctness aside, Kant's ideas on races also holds true till this day.
They said Immanuel Kant. Immanuel did it anyway.
Mera dost tha Immanuel Kant.
❤❤❤❤
Лежат, пусть и дальше лежат": ЕС просят не трогать замороженные активы России - СМИ
04.04.24, 08:11
617
Китай, Саудовская Аравия и Индонезия пытаются убедить Евросоюз не передавать эти деньги на нужды Украины. И Ирана
Thank you for your comment. If possible, please comment in English next time so that more people can follow the discussion. All the best!
I had to abandon this video. The continuous mispronunciation of Kant's name of the narrator is unnecessary.
@@nancya2347 I think the T in Kant is silent. It's pronounced Kan instead of Kant.
Yes agree he failed to recognised black as well. However as he was white.
The mind is primarily not an active agent, Kant as all western philosophers after the scholastics was a fool.
of course. all of us in the west are fools. we need to turn to eastern wisdoms
Question: What was he smoking on that pipe every time?
You still might not disagree with Kants’ racist theories and ideas. The Western European ideology is overwhelmingly dominant in our mother Africa and it’s shocking to know that there is a big number of our people that think that they are less inferior in terms of reason as compared to the other races. Very interesting. Probably a topic that will never be exhausted with today’s influence of cancel culture and race debates.
What racist theory?
Surely Kant failed in chosing 1980s style graphics to represent his ideas.
❤
wow everything Kant said wasn't what he truly believed.
Michael Sandel brought me here
Good documentary, until the "racist" end.
He was a racist, like we all are.
Because there ARE differences between the races.
Something we should celebrate, and not be condemned for saying out loud.
Like the difference between women and men. Hurray and amen.
Knowing he was a racist in the worst sense along with his disregard for woman makes revisiting his work a necessary evil. He surely didn't "Sapere Aude" when it came to these & others.
The father of superiority and using other peoples means to acheive your own ends.
OPM other peoples money. Aka our current banking system.
It's about political philosophy not metaphysics
It’s ironic , Kant also believed that the colonials in America had the right to eliminate the inferior native population. he believed enlightenment for white people.
I'll barrow his views on hope ❤
Use your brain and look at me for it.
To simply say Kant "rejects God" is misleading.
He does not reject God he is a theocrat
Saw this in my feed. Sorry, but who are DW to lecture me on using my brain? 😂Preposterous.
If I'd ever seen DW using its own brains effectively, I'd hear them out. But I haven't and I won't. So TTFN.
This not my job