Vry.effective vdo.lecture bt.as a professional I think apart from communication skills , human skills, political skills etc.the conceptual skill is also very important as it the ability to view the organization as a total entity comprising various systems nd subsystems.Also technical nd diagnostic skill helps the HR management to rectify the workforce problems in effective manner to achieve goals in brief.Vry inspiring lecture.Thanx.
With the evaluation, what if your doing one for a team of upwards of 50? Requesting feedback from 5 different stakeholders just isn’t practical. Plus what if each person asked had a different opinion about a persons skill set? Wouldn’t it be better to get an evaluation from the employee and their line manager?
Hi there. When evaluating a large team, like one with over 50 members, involving multiple stakeholders in the evaluation process can provide a more holistic view of an employee's performance and skills. However, for larger teams, it might not be feasible to gather feedback from multiple sources for every individual. In such cases, a targeted approach can be more practical. For instance, you could request feedback from different stakeholders for different team members. Regarding your point about getting evaluations from the employee and their line manager only, this is certainly a more streamlined approach and can be effective, especially with limited time and resources. Self-evaluations allow employees to reflect on their own performance and set personal goals, while the line manager's evaluation provides an external perspective on their contributions and areas for development. Hopefully, this helps. All the best.
Vry.effective vdo.lecture bt.as a professional I think apart from communication skills , human skills, political skills etc.the conceptual skill is also very important as it the ability to view the organization as a total entity comprising various systems nd subsystems.Also technical nd diagnostic skill helps the HR management to rectify the workforce problems in effective manner to achieve goals in brief.Vry inspiring lecture.Thanx.
With the evaluation, what if your doing one for a team of upwards of 50? Requesting feedback from 5 different stakeholders just isn’t practical. Plus what if each person asked had a different opinion about a persons skill set? Wouldn’t it be better to get an evaluation from the employee and their line manager?
Hi there. When evaluating a large team, like one with over 50 members, involving multiple stakeholders in the evaluation process can provide a more holistic view of an employee's performance and skills.
However, for larger teams, it might not be feasible to gather feedback from multiple sources for every individual. In such cases, a targeted approach can be more practical. For instance, you could request feedback from different stakeholders for different team members.
Regarding your point about getting evaluations from the employee and their line manager only, this is certainly a more streamlined approach and can be effective, especially with limited time and resources. Self-evaluations allow employees to reflect on their own performance and set personal goals, while the line manager's evaluation provides an external perspective on their contributions and areas for development.
Hopefully, this helps. All the best.
Good from subjective perspective but it would be much better if practical examples had been added to it
Thanks and thank you for the feedback.