Plankz Buoyancy Engine
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 17 сен 2024
- The Plankz Buoyancy Engine is an Alternate Energy device that captures buoyancy energy to generate power. It is a more reliable alternative to Solar or Wind Turbines generators, which are prone to reduced outputs in non-optimum climatic conditions.
For 15 years, I have been working with angular resonance and I am ready to do the electricity generation project together with investors who agree to make an official protocol. Everything will be done openly after the signatures are signed.
Great minds think alike.
I have been designing this model for a long time in my mind and supposed to built after my retirement.
What a great idea it is.
Only one thing is bothering me why this method is not gaining popularity.
This is possibly a very stupid mistake, but is most likely a scam. The lock at the bottom loses water with every buoyant body that enters. This must be pumped upwards with the same amount of energy that the buoyancy bodies generate. Of course, a buoyancy power plant is fundamentally impossible.
Ok thats enough !!!
Heres one that works.
Inverted water wheel.
Instead of water falling onto a wheel and the weight of water in gravity causing the offset to make it turn.
Now we put a band shaped wheel into a tank of water. And for descriptions sake we will call for clock positions to know where im talking about.
Lets install 12 bellows bags around a 14' diameter wheel and the bellows bags are atached to the wheel with a hole in the wheel to allow the air to escape when the bellow is compressed in the squeeze chute . The top of the bellows
Has a hard flat surface with two rollers on it that rolls through the squeeze chute.
Fill bags @ 6,7,8,9,10,and11
And the wheel will begin to turn in a clockwise direction.
From 11:30 to 12:30 is the water level so when the 11:00 begins coming out of the water at 11:30 its rollers on top enter the squeeze chute whic is only two rails that progressivly gets closer to the wheel so the bag gets squeezed shut over a clock position. All the bags on the left of the wheel have lifting strength to push one bag through the squeeze chute. Now the air will travel through the pipe that connects to the adjacent bag at the bottom of the wheel to begin lifting all over again. After the top bag is empty it gets locked by spring loaded lever latch and stays locked till around 5:00 position where it gets unlocked and is ready to accept air again. So no air on right side of wheel . All air keeps getting transfered to bottom to begin rotational lifting strength. If the bags are 3 cubic feet of air,, then they each have 186 pounds of lift strength. But there will be 5 doing lift job while the 6th is being transfered while in open air and not affecting the rotation except through the squeeze chute. Because the squeeze chute empties the bag while rotating , friction is at a minimal. Remember 5 bags lifting is 930 pounds of lift strength on one side. But honestly probably not all at once because of position on the wheel. But certainly enough to rotate on bag through the squeeze chute. Is axtually so simple . Its just a matter of positioning and timing of locks and water level and squeeze chute precision. 6 pipes will depending on bag size the diameter of the pipe to allow it to quickly exit the squeezed bag and enter the lower bag . You can put multiples of theese together or enlarge just one. But im sure theres a perfect size that is the most effecient. All ive done is document everything and with diagrams of every aspect of the machine and had the post office put their government date on all documents then it was sent to me 3 day pryority sealed to never be opened unless someone else claims to have invented it before me. Then they will have to proove they did it before me and it was a while back when i came up with this. So I will not sue anyone who wants to build these and sell them but dont claim you invented it. Ive discussed it on the radio twice and had ti call back in a number of times to clarify some aspects of it for some people. So that should make it un patentable by patent laws.
You should show a real video of the one you're selling
So many people trapped in the box it's amazing. 😂
I have been running this simulation in my brain for over a year before searching for it. It has gone through many modifications and looks exactly like yours. How did we come to this idea separated but in parallel? I too have been stuck on the re-entry problem.
I have solved this problem
Lol me too, I never thought I'd see this online coz this design is exactly what I had in mind. I was shocked when I saw the thumbnail
@@paksauditech.5360 please post video i need help with my energy hole
How do you assure the waterproof seel on the botom side of the funnel with water, with no water losses? Do not think this might work reliably on practical scale.
Faire comme un couvercle de torpille de sous marin
It is impossible bcs to take a balloon e.g to the bottom of certain liquid again needs energy.similarly is the case of gravity.to take a thing again to certain height will need energy.
Please make a practical modal.
I have made it
This is possibly a very stupid mistake, but is most likely a scam. The lock at the bottom loses water with every buoyant body that enters. This must be pumped upwards with the same amount of energy that the buoyancy bodies generate. Of course, a buoyancy power plant is fundamentally impossible.
You're saying you have a machine that produces energy? So... your machine not only is a proof science was wrong saying creating more energy than consumed is impossible, but it's got an economical value greater than anything else that has ever existed. Why do you play hide-n-seek? Make your work known, show how it works, sell it worldwide. Become famous.
Thinking is easy to implement, difficult and may end in failure
Only a dream,this device don’t work
This will not work,
could you maybe say why? rly I want to know. I know it shouldn't work but I can't find a reason why it wouldn't
@@lucakun3455 This is why:
ruclips.net/video/Zo5_8KURECg/видео.html
Its not possible because the water will fall out of the point where the balls goes in
@@lucakun3455 The lock at the bottom loses water with every buoyant body that enters. This must be pumped upwards with the same amount of energy that the buoyancy bodies generate. Of course, a buoyancy power plant is fundamentally impossible.
The web site for selling the Buoyancy Engine is not accessible. Is there another site?
Domestic model please
lol
I have a better one than that.