The mistake as pointed out was trusting self serving politicians to do their part in working out the mechanisms to implement the anti dynasty law which up to now they have not done. A clear lesson not to trust these politicians to tinker with the Constitution as they will only institute changes that will benefit them.
Nothing to do with dynasty? So you are contented and you like the system wherein the mayor, maybe 2 or 3 from the council, the governor, the congressman, maybe a senator, possibly a vp or even vp ARE JUST FROM ONE FAMILY?
@@nocomment3866 that is exactly the issue - people running for a official post are all in one family. ang baba ng kaisipan mo. there was never any mention in the reply COMMENT questioning how they are seated in their posts, ISN'T IT. Unless you understood something different. IT IS THE POLITICAL MENACE in the Philippines, and the other party to this menace are the BOBOTANTES. BECAUSE I AM PRETTY CERTAIN IN EVERY ELECTION HELD, THERE ARE ALSO OTHER CANDIDATES THAT ARE NON-FAMILY MEMBERS. pero BOBOTANTES NGA, eh. At gusto niyo pa ng federalism form.
How then can we liberate our people if we’ll maintain the status quo? Imagine it’s almost four decades now, do you not hear the cries of our kababayan at the countryside who were left behind because of our stupid Charter ‘87?
dapat nuon pa sana, paano kapag naisabatas ang anti dynasty bill? sa dami ng elected na dynasty members, maraming upuan ang mababakante? makakahinga na ba si gloc sa kanyang pagkakaipit sa ilalim upuan?
Bago pa tayu naging alipin nang mga dayuhan normal na ang dynasty monarkiya na ang maharlika ginulo lang nang mga hepocryte na nagdala nang freedom kuno.
It was NOT exactly a mistake. But when regular people come across this thumbnail, they would understandably conclude that the framers of the 1986 constitution was a mistake, thereby subjecting it to change is justifiable.
We can have the best-written laws by the brightest minds but if those that are supposed to implement them are not so inclined, they are useless. What is missing? A moral compass?
It does not depend on the implementor but on the laws! The constitution is the mastermind while the implementor are mere accomplices of the charter in the production of history.
@@Knoxy309 @Knoxy309 How can the constitution be the mastermind? Does it act by itself? Doesn't it need an implementor? And if the law enforcement agency and the justice department collaborate with the implementor against the enforcement of the constitution, what then?
Not constitution but corrupt gov't officials not the LAW but the SINFUL HEARTS OF POLITICIAN REPENT ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST as LORD AND SAVIOR be saved you and your country THAT THE solution AMEN
Well they said that Phil. is an agricultural country yet the framer of the 1987 constitution did not protect our agricultural lands especially rice land which were now turned to subdivision. How can we become self sufficient in our rice consumption..are we going to import rice till the end of time?
Constitutional change can be beneficial to address evolving societal needs. Considering updates to the 1987 Constitution may help align governance with current realities and better serve the people's interests. Societal needs and interests evolve over time DUE TO changes in technology, demographics, and cultural values. Constitutional adjustments can address these shifts, ensuring that the legal framework remains relevant and responsive to contemporary challenges. For example, changes may be needed to enhance protection of individual rights, adapt to economic developments, or address emerging issues like environmental concerns. Updating the constitution can contribute to a more effective and equitable governance system.
Why oh Why? Did the framers have forgotten that because Marcos Senior was ousted the remaining present and future politicians in Congress will abide the 1987 Constitution regarding the anti-dynasty provision? The framers wrote the prohibitions regarding the President and those related to him but left it to the Congress to make a law prohibiting dynastic political clans emerging. Btw, I will support amending the Constitution if the very first to be amended is the Anti-Dynasty provision that is self-executing.
So maybe if d consti should be amended then it should add provisions in which politicians and buisnesses do not abuse previleges granted them, either pioneering or existing.
To prevent abuses, then do not vest powers in the institution as what happened in articles 6, 7 and 8 section 1. Vest all powers instead “in the State thru its institutions. With Sovereign state, the institutions cannot abuse the citizens.
If they let foreigners to own to own properties sa Pinas talo ang lahat na mamayan, tataas ang value ng lupa at upa kawawa tayong lahat, that's what happened to Vancouver and Toronto Canada.
Greedy leaders and businesses have made our country in a great miserable state. Mga walang kabusogan at ang mga tao naman ay madaling malinlang sa panahon ng election.
NAGKAMALI ang FRAMERS ng 1987 Constitution dahil na UNDERESTIMATE nila ang GREED ng mga POLITICO! Yuon ang PAGKAKAMALI nila! HINDI nila TINUTUKOY na may MALI sa 1987 Constitution! AVE MARIA!
Wrong, try again! We need to reform the constitution and shift to a Federal-Parliament system. This type of gov't is widely used by most progressive countries, and that's a fact. Wag na natin asahan na may political messiah na magsasalba sa ating bansa, dahil imposible yun. The system shapes the behavior of our leaders.
i understand monsod's dismay; for at the start, they were listening only to their own self-proclaimed vision then without listening to the voice of the poor. While they suffer, intellectually, the poor ones suffer stomachilly and headachilly daily :)
Monsod : "Bakit pinagbibintangan nila lage nila yung constitution, where ang dapat nilang pagbintangan yung sarili nila, ang kanilang Greed for Power.."
You’re actually to naive, Mr. Monsod! As you know, there are two protagonists in the production of history. One is people, the other is the constitution. Now, since people are mere followers of the constitution, therefore the cause of all graft and corruption, exploitations and oppressions is none other than the constitution!
Kasama ako ng judge as security scort noon dyan sa Dusit Hotel. Chacha topic nila. Dark future mangyayari sa mga Filipino pag na approve ang chacha, lalong yayaman mga mayayaman at lalong maghihirap mga mahihirap sa buhay na mga Filipinos
If the mistakes had been honestly accepted by the framer of the constitution, then why there was or were no assessment done after some years of implementation esp. pertaining to Political Dynasty? This is so that proper and on time amendments can be done in favor of the greater majority para lahat ay masaya at ang bansa ay magiging maunlad na sana when these greedy politicians are stopped and apprehended.
tawag dyan bug abused. kung gamer ka alam mo yan. biruin mo lahat sumusunod sa game rules, tapus nka discover ka na mabilis mkakuha ng gold at xp basta marami ka kasabwat. tahimik lng mga yan pero legal na mangurakot dahil sa palpak at ayaw mag game update,kawawa susumof na henerasyon pamumunuan ng mga trustfunds babies ng mga pulitiko na walang karanasan pero maraming pera at may kpangyarihan😢
35 yrs saka lang nalaman na mali...daming damay military modenazation labor salary walang regular na empleyado agency sa malalaking kompanya.daming nag hirap dumami ang squaters hayyyysss...bansang pinas sana naman wag ng maranasan ng sususnod na henerasyon ang hirap na dinanas naming henerasyong 80's 90's up to now.,
I perceive na isa changes na gustong gawin ng pabor sa chacha ay termino ng pag upo sa position ng politiko, gusto nila dagdagan...Doon sa pumapabor ng 100pct foreign ownership ng businesses, think twice kung ngayon nga nag aaway mga Filipinos dahil kulang na opportunity na umangat sa pagmomonopoly ng iilang Pinoy businessmen dadagdagan pa dayuhan. Tingnan ninyo nagsulputan kung saan saan un establishments na may malalaking pangalan, nakita ba ninyo ang epekto nito sa kumonidad?
The framers were either too idealistic or too naive. I have a feeling it was more of being naive as they were blinded by the high of the EDSA Revolution. I cannot necessarily blame them for that, as they felt confident then that by ousting a dictator, maybe the people would have the guts to hold accountable or oust future politicians who want to take Marcos Sr.'s place. They were wrong, but hindsight is always 100 percent.
You are right, they were too naive! They wrote it as though there writing ordinary laws not knowing they were building the State and its institutions in the constitution!
And yes...political dynasty must not be allowed throughout d country, FOI that is free from threats and intimidation, protection for all media practitioners from harrassment by providing them with bodyguards, paid for by the gov't.
Even monsod now admits that the 1987 Cory Constitution is not working because of big business (oligarchy) but still he remains protectionist in his orientation. It's time we introduced charter change and opened up the economy for 100% foreign ownership.
He did not say that the 1987 Constitution is not working. I believe you are not a Filipino, a chinese may be, who wants 100% ownership of business here.
@@jnjs7844 it is not really working. What do you call it then? We need a new beginning. Our politicians need to change, too. Your idea of economic protectionism is what brought us to this poverty in the first place.Our economy is uncompetitive and not conducive for job generation.
YES real truth comes in the middle of the night. Pag gising nila ayy mali! Then na tulog uli, pag gising 31 yrs ago na pala? Ayy maling Mali talaga. Nag turuan na?
Dami nag bago after People Power. Pero operating system natin which our constitution nasa Windows 95 parin. Hahaha, Manong Windows 10 napo tayo. Pahinga kana, kami na bahala mga bagong henerasyon.
Isama nila sa discussion ng ammendments ng constitution ang mga framers nito para lumabas ang tunay na demokrasya, wag puro politiko na naka upo lang,cguradong self interest lang ang manginngibabaw dyan.
totoo kahit makailang palit pa yan kung silang mga ganid na trapo pa rin mga pulitiko wala pa rin mangyayari bagkos magkakaroon pa sila ng dagdag panahon manatili sa pwesto. Maganda layunin ng 1987 constitution para hindi na makabalik mga tulad ng mga Marcos sa pwesto pero nakahanap pa rin mga ganid tulad nila makapangbudol sa taumbayan.
That is tantamount to saying that the Public Servants and the people are stupid, which is wrong! It is not the constitution that follows us.We are the followers of the constitution. That is why the problem is the constitution!
What can you expect? 1986 kudeta at nag karoon ng revolutionary government pag katapos 1987 meron na agad konstitusyon? ano yan madaling madali a, bukod sa imperfect it is also inefficient.
Dapat may Goberno talaga na pinamumunuan ng partido na tunay nagpapahalaga sa bayan para doon isangkatuparan ang pagdagdag ng kulang sa 1987 Constitution. Kaya sa susunod na eleksyon siguraduhin dapat ng mga nasa oppositions na di sila madi disadvantage sa eleksyon. Ngayon pa lang kumonsulta na sila sa mga bansa sa Int'l Community na may strong democratic institutions at may malawak na knowledge sa pag safeguard ng electronic voting machines. Igiit din dapat ng mga nasa oppositions ang Hybrid Election.
At the end of the day. If we don't take action about the currently increasing unfairness in social and economic development, we would see a Philippines underdeveloped, lobotmized, and enslaved. Simple Economics explains increasing Minimum Wage doesn't solve things, an overflow of resources lowers their price, if there are more jobs than workers they will increase incentives to have workers.
Lahat naman ng constitution hindi perfect. Mula Singapore, Japan, USA, Germany, Netherlands, hindi rin perpekto Constitution nila. Ang problema is Corruption itself.
Ever since pag may usapan sa pagbago ng Saligang Batas, lago kong sinasabi, wala akong tiwala sa mga taong inaatasang magbago ng Constitution. The 50 or so framers of the 1987 Constitution, wala akong nabalitaan na nagpakasasa sa government position, or nangurakot. They just did the job that they are supposed to do.
FPRRD wants NDS(national democratic socializm) may video pa si baste ng NDS, magandang pakinggan sa umpisa pero pag tumagal magiging PDS(personal dictator socializm) clever ang congress hindi papasa, now congress is pushing cha-cha using PI, sana may kabaitan pa ang congress, igaya tayo sa bansang europa na may parliamentary system or kunin ang mga sistemang magiging panalo ang taong bayan, pero guni-guni at kathang isip ko na lang ito!
if the 1987 constitution have been framed strong then it cannot even be manipulated but it brought a lot of loop holes to be manipulated you know..imagine manipulating the law of the land…
Dapat pagbawalan na ang oligarchy sa bagong constitution lalo na may ari ng power plant at may ari ng langis na iisa lang yung negosyante halos lahat may ng power plant pagbawalin din kasi may interes at minamapula nila ang presyo kuryente langis isama na lupa sa sakahan
Maliwanag din economic provisions lang ang iaamend di lahat NG constitution Tayo nalang ang ganyan sa buong mundo 40-60 ownership kaya nagaalisan mga globally standard companies like FedEx etc all
walang problema sa dynasties nasa demokrasya naman tayo majority parin ang magdidikta. for me hindi yon greed, ang ayaw dyan talaga yong mga politikong walang panalo at hindi mananalo
Kahit ano pa yang sinasaad ng batas kng makapanyarihan ang lumabag sa batas ay wala ding silbi ang batas. Kng may dapat baguhin ay yong Ipatupad talaga ang batas.
Kung Babaguhin yung Saligang batas.... Dapat kasali jan lahat ng high level Law expert sa lahat ng universidad dito sa bansa at mga high level economist hindi yung kakaunti lang yung titingin..ika nga mas maraming kikilatis mas maganda.. Kahit wag ng isali ang senado, di nman law expert mga yan..artista halos lahat yan 🤣🤣🤣
Dahil inamin nya na may mali sila sa pagbalangkas ng saligang batas, bakit ayaw pa nya suportahan ang reporma sa saligang batas para maitama ang pagkakamali nila.
The giver of the social, political and economic conditions is the principle of the constitution. And we merely adapt to the condition to produce events. Hence if the events are bad, then it is not because of us but because of the constitution. How did we become wrong if we merely followed the constitution?
??.. the 1987 constitution was primarily made by people who suffered detention... to avoid such action be applied to the next generation ... wth r u talking about?
Cojuangco, Romualdez, Lopez... examples of 'dynastic' families since Spanish colonial times that thrives today. Then next newer names during the American occupation.
Hindi puwedeng pagkatiwalaan ang mga politico, kahit na sino pa. Noong unang ipatupad ang 1987 Constitution ang nakaupo ay si Cory Aquino. Ang mga Aquino, kagaya rin ng iba pang political families sa Pilipinas halip na ipatupad ang anti-dynasty law, ay nagpasasa sa kapangyarihan. Presidente na, mga senador at congressman pa, pati na governor, mayors, councilors, pati barangays pinasok. Pare-parehong gahaman sa kapangyarihan ang mga political families sa Pilipinas. LORD JESUS please help us.
The mistake as pointed out was trusting self serving politicians to do their part in working out the mechanisms to implement the anti dynasty law which up to now they have not done.
A clear lesson not to trust these politicians to tinker with the Constitution as they will only institute changes that will benefit them.
IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DYNASTY. IT HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH CURRENT EVENTS. It is time to review it.
Nothing to do with dynasty?
So you are contented and you like the system wherein the mayor, maybe 2 or 3 from the council, the governor, the congressman, maybe a senator, possibly a vp or even vp ARE JUST FROM ONE FAMILY?
@@poreyndyerpinoythat's how our election works. People vote for them. Unless you want to dictate who people should vote for.
@@nocomment3866 that is exactly the issue - people running for a official post are all in one family.
ang baba ng kaisipan mo. there was never any mention in the reply COMMENT questioning how they are seated in their posts, ISN'T IT. Unless you understood something different. IT IS THE POLITICAL MENACE in the Philippines, and the other party to this menace are the BOBOTANTES. BECAUSE I AM PRETTY CERTAIN IN EVERY ELECTION HELD, THERE ARE ALSO OTHER CANDIDATES THAT ARE NON-FAMILY MEMBERS. pero BOBOTANTES NGA, eh. At gusto niyo pa ng federalism form.
How then can we liberate our people if we’ll maintain the status quo? Imagine it’s almost four decades now, do you not hear the cries of our kababayan at the countryside who were left behind because of our stupid Charter ‘87?
Political dynasty sa bansa ,,,alisin ,,higpitan ang patakaran
Ugat ng kahirapan at corruption
dapat nuon pa sana, paano kapag naisabatas ang anti dynasty bill? sa dami ng elected na dynasty members, maraming upuan ang mababakante? makakahinga na ba si gloc sa kanyang pagkakaipit sa ilalim upuan?
Bago pa tayu naging alipin nang mga dayuhan normal na ang dynasty monarkiya na ang maharlika ginulo lang nang mga hepocryte na nagdala nang freedom kuno.
It was NOT exactly a mistake. But when regular people come across this thumbnail, they would understandably conclude that the framers of the 1986 constitution was a mistake, thereby subjecting it to change is justifiable.
I agree. The 1987 Constitution needs to be revisited and reviewed. CHANGE IS GOOD. We need to cope up with change for the better.
naku, kapag nabasa ito ng mga trolls, e-edit na naman itong video tsaka gagamiting propaganda video at ipakakalat din nga mga vloggers.
Nabbaluktot kasi ng mga politikong may personal interest.
We can have the best-written laws by the brightest minds but if those that are supposed to implement them are not so inclined, they are useless. What is missing? A moral compass?
It does not depend on the implementor but on the laws! The constitution is the mastermind while the implementor are mere accomplices of the charter in the production of history.
@@Knoxy309 @Knoxy309
How can the constitution be the mastermind? Does it act by itself? Doesn't it need an implementor? And if the law enforcement agency and the justice department collaborate with the implementor against the enforcement of the constitution, what then?
Hindi talaga dapat iunderestimate ang greed ng mga politiko sa pinas...to the highest level talaga ang pagkaganid ng mga political dynasty.
walang dpat sisihin kundi ang mga politikong ganid sa kpangyarihan at mga taong mukhang pera hndi na inisip ang magiging kahihinatnan.
Well, hindi naman sila magiging ganid kung d sila nakakita ng butas sa batas.
Mga political dynasty
Hindi mawawala yang mga ganid...kaya dapat error proof yung saligang batas
From John F. Kennedy
CHANGE is the law of life and those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.
Not constitution but corrupt gov't officials not the LAW but the SINFUL HEARTS OF POLITICIAN REPENT ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST as LORD AND SAVIOR be saved you and your country THAT THE solution AMEN
"When the love of power is replaced by the power of love, how wonderful life in the Philippines would be."
that's a pipe dream.
Well they said that Phil. is an agricultural country yet the framer of the 1987 constitution did not protect our agricultural lands especially rice land which were now turned to subdivision. How can we become self sufficient in our rice consumption..are we going to import rice till the end of time?
The congress cannot comprehend with the essence of the Constitution that you discussed
Constitutional change can be beneficial to address evolving societal needs. Considering updates to the 1987 Constitution may help align governance with current realities and better serve the people's interests.
Societal needs and interests evolve over time DUE TO changes in technology, demographics, and cultural values. Constitutional adjustments can address these shifts, ensuring that the legal framework remains relevant and responsive to contemporary challenges. For example, changes may be needed to enhance protection of individual rights, adapt to economic developments, or address emerging issues like environmental concerns. Updating the constitution can contribute to a more effective and equitable governance system.
Sana may clause na rin na nagbabawal sa pageendorse ng kandidato. Cough. Block voting. Cough.
Correct greed to power and wealth is what made Philippines impoverished not 1987 Constitution.
Ang weird pa dyan yung mga nag susulong ng cha cha hindi manlang law graduate. (Cough, Cough) Robin Padilla.
Huhuhu kawawang Pilipinas😢
Constitution if required can be amended if necessary to make changes especially that you have stated you made a mistake
Why oh Why? Did the framers have forgotten that because Marcos Senior was ousted the remaining present and future politicians in Congress will abide the 1987 Constitution regarding the anti-dynasty provision? The framers wrote the prohibitions regarding the President and those related to him but left it to the Congress to make a law prohibiting dynastic political clans emerging. Btw, I will support amending the Constitution if the very first to be amended is the Anti-Dynasty provision that is self-executing.
So maybe if d consti should be amended then it should add provisions in which politicians and buisnesses do not abuse previleges granted them, either pioneering or existing.
To prevent abuses, then do not vest powers in the institution as what happened in articles 6, 7 and 8 section 1. Vest all powers instead “in the State thru its institutions. With Sovereign state, the institutions cannot abuse the citizens.
@@Knoxy309
What would stop the Sovereign state from abusing it's citizens?
If they let foreigners to own to own properties sa Pinas talo ang lahat na mamayan, tataas ang value ng lupa at upa kawawa tayong lahat, that's what happened to Vancouver and Toronto Canada.
Hindi naiisip Yan ng mga bayarang botante na panatiko
admits mistake but doesn't own it
Sinasadya nila yan lalo na si Monsod impossible na na under estimate nila ang ka greedy ng mga politician. Lolo ka Monsod
Greedy leaders and businesses have made our country in a great miserable state. Mga walang kabusogan at ang mga tao naman ay madaling malinlang sa panahon ng election.
Very interesting at enlightening ang discussion na ito
POOR PILIPINO! THE FOUNDATION OF RULES AND LAWS ARE WEAK.
can't imagine with all those brains combine, nag kakamali parin....federal nlang sana bansa natin..🙄
Greedy politicians
NAGKAMALI ang FRAMERS ng 1987 Constitution dahil na UNDERESTIMATE nila ang GREED ng mga POLITICO!
Yuon ang PAGKAKAMALI nila! HINDI nila TINUTUKOY na may MALI sa 1987 Constitution!
AVE MARIA!
pulitiko ang problema sa Pilipinas hindi ang saligang batas..
hindi lang daw mga politiko kundi pati ang mga may srlf interest
No botante ang problema
Kaya nga babaguhin yang Saligang batas para hindi umabuso politiko
Politicians embodies the reality in the Philippines 😂
Wrong, try again! We need to reform the constitution and shift to a Federal-Parliament system. This type of gov't is widely used by most progressive countries, and that's a fact. Wag na natin asahan na may political messiah na magsasalba sa ating bansa, dahil imposible yun. The system shapes the behavior of our leaders.
i understand monsod's dismay; for at the start, they were listening only to their own self-proclaimed vision then without listening to the voice of the poor. While they suffer, intellectually, the poor ones suffer stomachilly and headachilly daily :)
Magsisi ka man huli na,maghihintay pa tayo ng good leader in the future,dedepende pa sa mga botante natin,SANA ALL
Monsod : "Bakit pinagbibintangan nila lage nila yung constitution, where ang dapat nilang pagbintangan yung sarili nila, ang kanilang Greed for Power.."
You’re actually to naive, Mr. Monsod!
As you know, there are two protagonists in the production of history. One is people, the other is the constitution. Now, since people are mere followers of the constitution, therefore the cause of all graft and corruption, exploitations and oppressions is none other than the constitution!
Kasama ako ng judge as security scort noon dyan sa Dusit Hotel. Chacha topic nila. Dark future mangyayari sa mga Filipino pag na approve ang chacha, lalong yayaman mga mayayaman at lalong maghihirap mga mahihirap sa buhay na mga Filipinos
If the mistakes had been honestly accepted by the framer of the constitution, then why there was or were no assessment done after some years of implementation esp. pertaining to Political Dynasty? This is so that proper and on time amendments can be done in favor of the greater majority para lahat ay masaya at ang bansa ay magiging maunlad na sana when these greedy politicians are stopped and apprehended.
Because the amendments would have to be done by people who are opposed to it. It’s against their interests to amend it.
there were lots of bills but of course the majority of lawmakers didnt like to pass anti dynasty law for greedy reasons
tawag dyan bug abused. kung gamer ka alam mo yan.
biruin mo lahat sumusunod sa game rules, tapus nka discover
ka na mabilis mkakuha ng gold at xp basta marami ka
kasabwat. tahimik lng mga yan pero legal na mangurakot
dahil sa palpak at ayaw mag game update,kawawa susumof
na henerasyon pamumunuan ng mga trustfunds babies
ng mga pulitiko na walang karanasan pero maraming pera
at may kpangyarihan😢
Sana mawala na ang political dynasty. Sa aking hometown jusko halos lahat ng pamilya andyan sa politika nakaupo.
If an amendment be made to our constitution, there should be an evaluation of the amendment made on how effective the provision thereof after 5 years.
Nakita nyo na ang galing nyong magsalita. The interviewer's and the interviewee's.
TheY HavE ThE ChancE to EnD PoliticaL DynastY. NoW MonsoD AdmitteD They'vE MadE ThE MistakE.
Hahaha 😅😅😅
35 yrs saka lang nalaman na mali...daming damay military modenazation labor salary walang regular na empleyado agency sa malalaking kompanya.daming nag hirap dumami ang squaters hayyyysss...bansang pinas sana naman wag ng maranasan ng sususnod na henerasyon ang hirap na dinanas naming henerasyong 80's 90's up to now.,
Amending the constitution, it's no longer an effect present Govt affairs .
Kung nagkamali noon,ano assurance na hindi magkakamali ngayon
Ang batas sa Pilipinas.. Kapag mahirap kulong agad.
Kapag mayaman
Naka confine sa
Ospital.. 😅
I am sorry🐰😂
Unless otherwise provided by law...simple mistake for old men in business.😂
Edsa clearly failed, we just replaced one crook with another
I perceive na isa changes na gustong gawin ng pabor sa chacha ay termino ng pag upo sa position ng politiko, gusto nila dagdagan...Doon sa pumapabor ng 100pct foreign ownership ng businesses, think twice kung ngayon nga nag aaway mga Filipinos dahil kulang na opportunity na umangat sa pagmomonopoly ng iilang Pinoy businessmen dadagdagan pa dayuhan. Tingnan ninyo nagsulputan kung saan saan un establishments na may malalaking pangalan, nakita ba ninyo ang epekto nito sa kumonidad?
so if we do charter change, how can we get rid of the dynastic families?
The framers were either too idealistic or too naive. I have a feeling it was more of being naive as they were blinded by the high of the EDSA Revolution. I cannot necessarily blame them for that, as they felt confident then that by ousting a dictator, maybe the people would have the guts to hold accountable or oust future politicians who want to take Marcos Sr.'s place.
They were wrong, but hindsight is always 100 percent.
You are right, they were too naive! They wrote it as though there writing ordinary laws not knowing they were building the State and its institutions in the constitution!
sundin ang batas ng DIYOS
ANG 10 UTOS... .YAN ANG ATING IBATAS SA BANSA...
And yes...political dynasty must not be allowed throughout d country, FOI that is free from threats and intimidation, protection for all media practitioners from harrassment by providing them with bodyguards, paid for by the gov't.
Sana ginawa nila yung modification ng Philippine Constitution noong buhay pa si Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago 😢.
Saan, Saan ako nagkamali 🎶 🎶
That is precisely why we need a charter change. Entiende!
Even monsod now admits that the 1987 Cory Constitution is not working because of big business (oligarchy) but still he remains protectionist in his orientation. It's time we introduced charter change and opened up the economy for 100% foreign ownership.
Intindihin mong mabuti hindi ang consti ang problema kundi ang mga pulitikong ganid sa pera sila yong di tumupad sa consti.
@@myladyrose2937 may butas pa din ang saligang batas natin kasi yan ang system at ang system ang nagpapasunod sa tao
@@jomariecallueng9220 tama ka jomarie. Thank you for answering.
He did not say that the 1987 Constitution is not working.
I believe you are not a Filipino, a chinese may be, who wants 100% ownership of business here.
@@jnjs7844 it is not really working. What do you call it then?
We need a new beginning. Our politicians need to change, too. Your idea of economic protectionism is what brought us to this poverty in the first place.Our economy is uncompetitive and not conducive for job generation.
Nagsimula Ang mga ganid na politiko after EDSA REVOLUTION😂😂😂
YES real truth comes in the middle of the night. Pag gising nila ayy mali! Then na tulog uli, pag gising 31 yrs ago na pala? Ayy maling Mali talaga. Nag turuan na?
"non performing" sino ba ang may authority to implement the law? sino ba dapat ang nagbabantay ng mga ginagawa ng mga politiko?
We must admit our mistakes first before we could move on, but it seems like no one is willing to admit their mistakes
We cannot move on without changing the constitution. And we cannot change it without admitting that that charter is wrong!
Yan din ang dahilan kaya maraming politiko ang ayaw ipabago ang konstitusyon.
Politicians ang main problem, naggugulangan sila sa power at pagkulimbat ng government funds.
Malaking Mali talaga ng 86 framers ay ang di paglagay ng pagbabawal sa political dynasty at ang di paglagay ng "proper" term limits.
Bakit na-exempt ang Hacienda Luisita sa land reform?
Okay. A little applause for Christian Monsod. It's rare to hear a boomer admit to commit a mistake.
IPAKITA NA INAAMIN NI MONSOD NA NAGKAMALI, CYBER LIBEL...
Missed opportunities.
Ganid sa power!!!
Dami nag bago after People Power. Pero operating system natin which our constitution nasa Windows 95 parin. Hahaha, Manong Windows 10 napo tayo. Pahinga kana, kami na bahala mga bagong henerasyon.
I-People's Initiative na lang natin ang "Anti-Political Dynasty" amendment, ayaw kasi gawin ng mga politiko.
Palitan na Ang constitution nayan
Isama nila sa discussion ng ammendments ng constitution ang mga framers nito para lumabas ang tunay na demokrasya, wag puro politiko na naka upo lang,cguradong self interest lang ang manginngibabaw dyan.
Red💩 will misinterpreted the word "mistake".
There is no problem with the 1987 constitution; the problem is with those who administer it and those who obey it.
totoo kahit makailang palit pa yan kung silang mga ganid na trapo pa rin mga pulitiko wala pa rin mangyayari bagkos magkakaroon pa sila ng dagdag panahon manatili sa pwesto.
Maganda layunin ng 1987 constitution para hindi na makabalik mga tulad ng mga Marcos sa pwesto pero nakahanap pa rin mga ganid tulad nila makapangbudol sa taumbayan.
😂😂😂😂 kaya pala wala maipakita na pagaaral sina monsod na nkabuti yung batas
The 1987 constitution is the very reason why the Philippines cannot advance. The rich are the only ones benefitting from it.
That is tantamount to saying that the Public Servants and the people are stupid, which is wrong!
It is not the constitution that follows us.We are the followers of the constitution. That is why the problem is the constitution!
What can you expect? 1986 kudeta at nag karoon ng revolutionary government pag katapos 1987 meron na agad konstitusyon? ano yan madaling madali a, bukod sa imperfect it is also inefficient.
Thats why we need. To abolish 1987 constituion one of its restraining effects to. Economy is having a nuclear powerplant
Marami Nyan dito sa Samar!😅
Dapat may Goberno talaga na pinamumunuan ng partido na tunay nagpapahalaga sa bayan para doon isangkatuparan ang pagdagdag ng kulang sa 1987 Constitution.
Kaya sa susunod na eleksyon siguraduhin dapat ng mga nasa oppositions na di sila madi disadvantage sa eleksyon. Ngayon pa lang kumonsulta na sila sa mga bansa sa Int'l Community na may strong democratic institutions at may malawak na knowledge sa pag safeguard ng electronic voting machines.
Igiit din dapat ng mga nasa oppositions ang Hybrid Election.
At the end of the day. If we don't take action about the currently increasing unfairness in social and economic development, we would see a Philippines underdeveloped, lobotmized, and enslaved. Simple Economics explains increasing Minimum Wage doesn't solve things, an overflow of resources lowers their price, if there are more jobs than workers they will increase incentives to have workers.
Lahat naman ng constitution hindi perfect. Mula Singapore, Japan, USA, Germany, Netherlands, hindi rin perpekto Constitution nila. Ang problema is Corruption itself.
Ever since pag may usapan sa pagbago ng Saligang Batas, lago kong sinasabi, wala akong tiwala sa mga taong inaatasang magbago ng Constitution. The 50 or so framers of the 1987 Constitution, wala akong nabalitaan na nagpakasasa sa government position, or nangurakot. They just did the job that they are supposed to do.
FPRRD wants NDS(national democratic socializm) may video pa si baste ng NDS, magandang pakinggan sa umpisa pero pag tumagal magiging PDS(personal dictator socializm) clever ang congress hindi papasa, now congress is pushing cha-cha using PI, sana may kabaitan pa ang congress, igaya tayo sa bansang europa na may parliamentary system or kunin ang mga sistemang magiging panalo ang taong bayan, pero guni-guni at kathang isip ko na lang ito!
In short: Impyerno tumira sa Pilipinas. Kapwa Pilipino ginagago.
if the 1987 constitution have been framed strong then it cannot even be manipulated but it brought a lot of loop holes to be manipulated you know..imagine manipulating the law of the land…
Ang malaking katanungan ngayon,bakit pinalitan yong 1973 Constitution?anong problema ng 1973 Constitution?
And took him more than 30 years to speak out?
Dapat pagbawalan na ang oligarchy sa bagong constitution lalo na may ari ng power plant at may ari ng langis na iisa lang yung negosyante halos lahat may ng power plant pagbawalin din kasi may interes at minamapula nila ang presyo kuryente langis isama na lupa sa sakahan
Dapat ipasa ng congresso ang Anti Dynasty Law 36 years na Ang 1987 constitution wala Silang ginawa, tapos sisisihin nila ang Constitution?
Dapat nilagay nyo specifically,,kapag may kumandidato na sa Family,, hal. Tatay,, bawal na asawa at mga anak sa kahit anumang position habang buhay..
😂😂😂 hahaha tapos ayaw palitan yung 1987 constitution
Christian excellent job po......
That’s why i see either it too idealistic or it’s deliberate
This is a testimony that edsa came through, passed away long ago.
Admittedly, there is a need to amend some sections and provisions of our Constitution.
Like what?
@@ARIELizationEconomic provisions.
@@melvinstarita638 which one specifically?
@@ARIELization All the PUBLIC and SERVICES economic provisions
and land ownership, too.
@@melvinstarita638 why, whats wrong with it?
The law on dynasty was crafted after edsa, you should question your allies because they were the ones sitting in government then
Maliwanag din economic provisions lang ang iaamend di lahat NG constitution
Tayo nalang ang ganyan sa buong mundo 40-60 ownership kaya nagaalisan mga globally standard companies like FedEx etc all
walang problema sa dynasties nasa demokrasya naman tayo majority parin ang magdidikta. for me hindi yon greed, ang ayaw dyan talaga yong mga politikong walang panalo at hindi mananalo
Kahit ano pa yang sinasaad ng batas kng makapanyarihan ang lumabag sa batas ay wala ding silbi ang batas. Kng may dapat baguhin ay yong Ipatupad talaga ang batas.
Kung Babaguhin yung Saligang batas....
Dapat kasali jan lahat ng high level Law expert sa lahat ng universidad dito sa bansa at mga high level economist
hindi yung kakaunti lang yung titingin..ika nga mas maraming kikilatis mas maganda..
Kahit wag ng isali ang senado, di nman law expert mga yan..artista halos lahat yan 🤣🤣🤣
Dahil inamin nya na may mali sila sa pagbalangkas ng saligang batas, bakit ayaw pa nya suportahan ang reporma sa saligang batas para maitama ang pagkakamali nila.
history is never a mistake because it is a resolution of a given condition in a given time
history revision, however; is evil
The giver of the social, political and economic conditions is the principle of the constitution. And we merely adapt to the condition to produce events. Hence if the events are bad, then it is not because of us but because of the constitution.
How did we become wrong if we merely followed the constitution?
??.. the 1987 constitution was primarily made by people who suffered detention... to avoid such action be applied to the next generation ... wth r u talking about?
@@Knoxy309
Can you please give an example of an event becoming bad because of the constitution?
Cojuangco, Romualdez, Lopez... examples of 'dynastic' families since Spanish colonial times that thrives today. Then next newer names during the American occupation.
The aquinos are also a dynasty
Pahinga kana Lolo Amoy lupa kana
Tandaan ninyo lagong nakasubaybay ang mga mamamayan at di habang buhay ay mabubuhay kayo
Hindi puwedeng pagkatiwalaan ang mga politico, kahit na sino pa. Noong unang ipatupad ang 1987 Constitution ang nakaupo ay si Cory Aquino. Ang mga Aquino, kagaya rin ng iba pang political families sa Pilipinas halip na ipatupad ang anti-dynasty law, ay nagpasasa sa kapangyarihan. Presidente na, mga senador at congressman pa, pati na governor, mayors, councilors, pati barangays pinasok.
Pare-parehong gahaman sa kapangyarihan ang mga political families sa Pilipinas.
LORD JESUS please help us.
Political dynasty at qualification ng kandidato sa national elections ang ilan sa malaking pagkukulang ng 1987 constitution