Why be Muslim? A. Proves/Miracles Itself 1) Prophecy - over 60, : preservation of Quran, etc. 2) Prophetic Person - Miraj, prayer, news, boosted provision, saliva heals etc. 3) Immediate Events - Moon Split, Badr Angels, Talking trees & stones, etc. 4) Science - over 60 5) Historical - over a dozen B. Practical Proofs : 1) Allah's Attributes & Honor is Preserved 2) Qur'an is preserved through recitation & Hadith sci. 3) Prophets' Honor is preserved. 4) Ritual Worship is preserved & Historical in prior scripture. 5) Structure of Balance From Belief, to Ibada to Adab & laws.
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha). The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا) "protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22) 𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼 ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic: ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word. This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical. Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE). |Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects | | Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects | | Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian | Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian. "Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language." God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Agreed sister. God is the Most Loving, the Most Merciful. He doesn’t need the sacrifice of an innocent human being in order to forgive mankind for their sins. Human sacrifice is pagan/satanic origin.
Assalaam Sister. This is Uncle Mohamed * May Allah reward you with Janat alfirdwas for the Dawah... * Your analyses are sound and well founded alhamdulillah * Regarding Matthew C 16 V 15 + 16 +17 * The son of God in the Bible most certainly does not mean the son of God as Christians believe * If the son of God meant what our Christian brothers and sisters believe, they- the Christians- will MOST CERTAINLY have a huge and a bigger problem as there are - if not thousands- but tens of thousands of sons of God in the bible * It would suffice to read the bible to find out * By way of instance Exodus C 4 V 22 reads : And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn: * Hope this is of help inchallah
Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself. Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted [James 1:13) God cannot be tempted (John 1:29) Jesus was seen (1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God (Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God (Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man (Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn (Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn (1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died (1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die (Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation (Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation (John 4:6) Jesus grew weary (Isaiah 40:28) God cannot grow weary (Mark 4:38) Jesus slept (Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep (John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful (Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful (Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing (Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
It's been explain ad nausium!!!!! Do some research and you will find what's illogical about that verse... I used to be a trinitarian well versed in the bible... reverted to Islam in 2019 alhamdulillah
The author of the gospel of John was a fraud, a fake and a dupe. The anonymous author of the Bible’s Gospel of John and 1 John, 2 John and 3 John is described in those texts as an eyewitness to the life of Jesus. Historically, researchers studying the works have not found evidence of the author’s identity or the existence of the community the author seems to address in his works. One major difference between the first three gospels - Matthew, Mark and Luke - and the last gospel, John, is that in John, Jesus suddenly becomes a god.😮 During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and ... none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. ... You do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, or the last Gospel. Jesus says things like, "Before Abraham was, I am." And, "I and the Father are one," and, "If you've seen me, you've seen the Father." These are all statements you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier gospels and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things. ... I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. This is not an unusual view amongst scholars; it's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understanding of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
Sister, Bible rightly said I and Father are one, on purpose because, to give guidance to mankind by giving revelation to Jesus (PBH) from Almighty God.
Assalaam Sister. This is Uncle Mohamed again 🙂 * Regarding John C 10 V 30 * Jesus PBUHP and GOD / Allah AWJ are one in purpose not as one entity * The purpose is that you cannot remove those who follow God or Jesus PBUH from them once they have believed * Please start reading from John C 10 V 24 to V 34 * and V 34 is very interesting for our Christian brothers and sisters: as Christians should worship Jews 🙂
السلام علیکم و رحمۃ اللہ و برکاتہ محترمہ بہن الیکسا Alexa I request and advise you to please dub your this VLOG in Urdu language and upload on your RUclips channel so that Urdu speaking Muslims / people of the world especially of sub continent ( India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka etc.) may also be benefitted from your valuable Islamic research on Islam / Quran... Thank you very much and I pray for you and your family members to be blessed day and night and I also pray ALLAH TAALA to keep you and all Muslims on Islam till death, Aameen summa Aameen.
99% of born Muslims follow Islam blindly. We us as born Muslims only recite the Quran in Arbic don’t read it with translation. Just follow so called maoulanas scholars . Don’t use sour mind . We have preserved brain lol 😆 Masha Allah revert Muslims thousands time better then a born Muslim . May Allah bless you sister.
Why you not read this, In quran is written in surah ayan Maryam chapter 19 verse 83 saying Do you ˹O Prophet˺ not see that We have sent the devils against the disbelievers, constantly inciting them? Do you not see that We have sent the devils to the unbelievers, inciting them to sin? This written by muhammad that Allah sent satan to disbeliever to push unbeliever to become evil What is the relationship of Allah and satan because he sent. Is this verse connected to hadith book is written in sahih al bukhari 4848, book 65, hadith 369 saying in narrated anas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The people will be thrown into the (Hell) Fire and it will say: "Are there any more (to come)?' (50.30) till Allah puts His Foot over it and it will say, 'Qati! Qati! (Enough Enough!)'". Allah's Statement: "...It (Hell) will say: 'Are there any more (to come)?" (V.50:30)
Keep Palestine in du'a and donate, but protesting isn't in sunnah... why ask oppressors, some who haven't changed, instead teach those who don't know & will listen and teach those who know practical solutions like the first two. --- she was a wich at 11, at 13 pagan, left at 21, met w. supremo who warns of Muslims so she read Quran in 2015 and it overwhelmed her. She was a superstitious monotheist in 2016, in 2017 read a so called holy bible, Old T was called new english bible written from prysbyterian, anglican and catholic clergy sopposedly translated from early manuscripts. she thought being "paulist" would be more familiar culturally! many paulist say cruciFICTION is needed for atonement... she asked how about bc? She read story of Jona when younger. Old T. says Jona was angry and wanted God to punish them, ppl of Miniva... so idea cruciFICTION was needed doesn't add up regarding forgiveness. Ibrahim 's son of sacrifices Ismail in Islam, Ishaq in bible. 10 :00 - lamb or ram is taken as a replacement. paulists say this sacrifice removes Ibrahim following the law, but it contradicts Moses's entire ministry up to even Jesus & other stories of the prophets being forgiven... she speaks of how Jesus's last words are contradiction & opposites mathew 27.46 & luke 23.46, this shows lack or reliability of the gospel, what else is missing? No Gospel has both lines, each has 1/2, why? (Even Mark 15.40, mathew 27.55 & luke 23.46 all say Jesus's crew is at distant, so did they really see Jesus in a cruci-FICTION) she brings up son of man claim. numbers 23.19 says God is not a man or son of man, so this shows Jesus isn't God! 20 :00 - Mathew 16.16 - Peter says though are Christ son of... Mark 8.29 & 30 - Peter says You are christ, and Jesus says don't tell anyone... but doesn't have son of God... So did Mathew add the son of God part? She says son and father are different things, and contradictions must come from the authros, gospels are not written by eyewitnesses, but collections of rumors. It's not just Muslims who call the trinity pagan... the trinity is a bc pagan model. she says Odin was a triune deity! Wicka which is 20th century w-craft. Moon of maiden, mother & crown - again triune! Words mean things, is water & Nar the same. 30 :00 - Says the contradictory nature of Jesus was psychadellic. God & Man are opposites of opposites and doesn't sound like God of Abraham & Moses! this bothered her... when her son was 6 months she prayed how can ppl want to worship God but worship messiah. she said God allowed her to answer her question (guided her). She then remembered the Quran she read corrects the bible! She said it was like a breeze cooling her. Re REading and accepting Quran won her over fully! said the first time reading the Quran was like looking at the sun when she returned to the cave then went to the bible as it's easier on her eyes but then went out back to the light! She researched Islam, HAdith Jibril, life of JEsus and Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him and then jumped in! Took shahada alone in 2018 and then tried to learn to pray, separated w/ babie's father and studied more! Now Islam makes her healthy and stable! WA aLeikum Asalam!
If there was a human being who deserved to be worshiped then he was your mother who carried you weighing -+2-3 kg for 9 months, during your pregnancy your mother could never sleep soundly, imagine your body being tied with a burden weighing -+2-3 kg for 9 months. And when your mother gave birth to you, she sacrificed her blood and even her life in excruciating pain. and while raising you, your mother had to be willing to sleep a little at night because you often woke up crying at night and could only calm down after being breastfed by your mother and this all went on for -+ 2 years and your mother was willing to clean up your feces and urine. and it lasted for -+ 5 years Your mother willingly suffered for you for years... Every human being is gifted by the Almighty Creator with a tool to detect wrong and right accurately. When we tell lies then the "Heart" really knows what we say is a lie. When we steal or rob, the "Heart" really knows that we are making a mistake. But unfortunately, we often ignore and don't want to listen to the voice of our "heart" because of our desires, greed and anger, hatred, so that we don't realize that we are deceiving and torturing ourselves.
☝️A/S If you start using intelligence given by God then it is kinda impossible to become Christian. And i am happy that you don't believe in shias and barelwis( indian version of sufism). They both believe that passed away auliyas in barzakh can help muslims by the permission of Allah. This aqeedah is totally against holy Quran and authentic hadiths.
Let me quotes contradictions verses in the Bible here is comes Undoubtedly mistakes in the Bible 2 King 24-8 Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother's name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem. 2 chronicles 36-9 Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD. WAS HE 18 YEARS OLD WHEN HE REGN OR WAS HE 8 YEARS OLD. WHICH ONE IS CORRECT BOTH CAN NOT BE CORRECT. 2 King 8-26 Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel. 2 chronicles 22-2 Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri. WAS HE 22 YEARS OLD OR WAS HE 42 YEARS OLD. BOTH CAN NOT BE CORRECT.
Do you know what are you trying to do, you are causing people in other universe to think. You have caused great harm to lots of people and destroyed their thinking. You have thrown a giant stone in clam water and created a repel effect i am afraid your explanation will make rethink their vision and belief.
God has only one not three ,Welcome to the right path sister ❤
Is only one ping, not has only one :)
Why be Muslim?
A. Proves/Miracles Itself
1) Prophecy - over 60, : preservation of Quran, etc.
2) Prophetic Person - Miraj, prayer, news, boosted provision, saliva heals etc.
3) Immediate Events - Moon Split, Badr Angels, Talking trees & stones, etc.
4) Science - over 60
5) Historical - over a dozen
B. Practical Proofs :
1) Allah's Attributes & Honor is Preserved
2) Qur'an is preserved through recitation & Hadith sci.
3) Prophets' Honor is preserved.
4) Ritual Worship is preserved & Historical in prior scripture.
5) Structure of Balance From Belief, to Ibada to Adab & laws.
Islam is religion for those who use logic & reasoning, Al Humdulillah for Islam
MAY ALLAH REWARD YOU THE PARADISE INSHALLAH SISTER..LOVE. AND RESPECTS FROM AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺 🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺☪️☪️☪️☪️🇦🇺☪️🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸❤️❤️🇵🇸❤️🇵🇸🕋
My Allah reward you sister ❤❤
Your feelings are true. The incidents are true. Allah is closer to us more than what we might think. Take a step, he takes 10 steps
Who is Allan bro?
For @amallisho 👍👍
SubhaanALLAH beautiful, I always love watching stories of reverts and always learn so much from you all. Welcome to the ummah ❤
alhamdullilah...always luv your video sister...always waiting for your other video too ..may Allah swt bless you and your dear son too...amin..🤲
Subhan Allah, Alhamdo Lillah, Masha Allah
Salam Sister, watching and supporting you from Singapore 🇸🇬 🤲🏼
May God bless you! May God grant you paradise!
Salam Alikoum sister, I hope that Allah protect and bless you
Masha'Allah
Smart woman = must be a Muslimah
God have choosen you to become righteous taking you from the darkness into light.
Barakallahu fiek
Alhamdulillah
The Aramaic word for God is Alaha. It's the word Isa PBUH (Jesus as his name is often misspelled due to the lack of the ayin sound in Greek, which was rendered to Iesous, coupling the nearest sound to ayin, same letter found in 'Iraq', which sounds entirely different in Arabic form 'Iran' in Arabic, with the -ous Greek suffix that Greeks typically add to their names 'HerodotOS', 'PlotinUS', 'AchelOUS' and later mumbled into a J). Sounds familiar? Written without the confusing vowels, it is A-L-H ܐ ܠܗܐ (alap-lamed-he) as found in Targum or in Tanakh (Daniel, Ezra), Syriac Aramaic (Peshitta), adducted from the Arabic original (of which Aramaic is a dialect continuum) 'A-L-L-H' (Aleph-Lam-Lam-Ha).
The yeshua rendition of Isa (his name in the Qur'an) PBUH which is purported to be the name of Jesus is KNOWN to had been taken from greek. Western Syriac also use "Isho". Western Aramaic (separate from Syriac which is a dialect of Eastern Aramaic) use "Yeshu". Western Syriac has been separate from Western Aramaic for about 1000 years. And sounds don't even match up. Syriac is a Christian liturgical language yet the four letters of the name of Jesus «ܝܫܘܥ» [ = Judeo-Babylonian Aramaic: «ישוע» ] sounds totally different in West vs East Syriac, viz. vocalized akin to Christian Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic «ܝܶܫܽܘܥ» (Yēšūʿ) in West Syriac, but pronounced more akin to Muslim Arabic Quran character name Isa in East Syriac «ܝܑܼܫܘܿܥ» (ʾĪšōʿ). The reason for this confusion is their dropping of phonemes as aforementioned. Only someone that has no idea what the letters are or how they sound would have a name ending in a pharyngeal fricative like the ayin, if it were to be used in a name it would have had to be in the beginning, thus the Arabic rendition is the correct one. In addition, The word God in hebrew is eloah, is a cognate of the Arabic I-L-H, pronounced ilah not eloah. Hebrew dropped the glottal stop and mumbled it into eloh, aramic mumbled a little less and it became elah. Infact it is written A-L-H in Arabic, it is pronounced i in Arabic cause it is an Alef with hamza below (إ أ ) They are two different forms of Alef. And it mean "a god", it is the non definitive form of A-L-L-H, in which the Alef is without a glottal stop/hamza,(ا)
"protosemetic" Alphabet (29), Arabic Alphabet (28), Latin transliteration, hebrew (22)
𐩠 𐩡 𐩢 𐩣 𐩤 𐩥 𐩦 𐩧 𐩨 𐩩 𐩪 𐩫 𐩬 𐩭 𐩮 𐩰 𐩱 𐩲 𐩳 𐩴 𐩵 𐩶 𐩷 𐩸 𐩹 𐩺 𐩻 𐩼
ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ك ل م ن ه و ي
A b t ṯ j h kh d ḏ r z s sh ṣ ḍ ṭ ẓ ʿ ġ f q k l m n h w y
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
Merged phonemes in hebrew and aramaic:
ح, خ (h, kh) merged into only kh consonant remain
س, ش (s, sh) merged into only Shin consonant remaining
ط, ظ (ṭ/teth, ẓ) merged into only ṭ/teth consonant remaining
ص, ض (ṣ, ḍ/Tsad ) merged into only ḍ/Tsad consonant remaining
ع, غ (3'ayn, Ghayn) merged into a reducted ayin consonant remaining
ت, ث (t/taw, th) merged into only t/taw consonant remaining
The reason why the protoS alphabet here is 28 and not 29, is because the supposed extra letter is simply a س written in a different position, but it was shoehorned to obfuscated. In Arabic letter shapes are different depending on whether they are in the beginning , middle or end of a word.
This kind of nuance is lost in the dialect continua. As a matter of fact, all of the knowledge needed for deciphering ancient texts and their complexity was derived from the Qur'an. It was by analyzing the syntactic structure of the Qur'an that the Arabic root system was developed. This system was first attested to in Kitab Al-Ayin, the first intralanguage dictionary of its kind, which preceded the Oxford English dictionary by 800 years. It was through this development that the concept of Arabic roots was established and later co-opted into the term 'semitic root,' allowing the decipherment of ancient scripts. In essence, they quite literally copied and pasted the entirety of the Arabic root. Hebrew had been dead, as well as all the other dialects of Arabic, until being 'revived' in a Frankensteinian fashion in the 18th and 19th centuries. The entire region spoke basically the same language, with mumbled dialect continuums spread about, and Arabic is the oldest form from which all these dialects branched off. As time passed, the language gradually became more degenerate, and then the Qur'an appeared with the oldest possible form of the language thousands of years later. This is why the Arabs of that time were challenged to produce 10 similar verses, and they couldn't. People think it's a miracle because they couldn't do it, but I think the miracle is the language itself. They had never spoken Arabic, nor has any other language before or since had this mathematical precision. And when I say mathematical, I quite literally mean mathematical.
Now how is it that the Qur'an came thousands of years later in an alphabet that had never been recorded before, and in the highest form the language had ever taken? The creator is neither bound by time nor space, therefore the names are uttered as they truly were, in a language that is lexically, syntactically, phonemically, and semantically older than the oldest recorded writing. In fact, that writing appears to have been a simplified version of it. Not only that, but it would be the equivalent of the greatest works of any particular language all appearing in one book, in a perfect script and in the highest form the language could ever take. It is so high in fact, that it had yet to be surpassed despite the fact that over the last millennium the collection of Arabic manuscripts when compared on word-per-word basis in Western Museums alone, when they are compared with the collected Greek and Latin manuscripts combined, the latter does not constitute 1 percent of the former as per German professor Frank Griffel, in addition all in a script that had never been recorded before. Thus, the enlightenment of mankind from barbarism and savagery began, and the age of reason and rationality was born from its study.
Language; When you look at the actual linguistics, you'll find that many were puzzled by the opposite, that is, how the other "semetic" (why in quotes will be revealed later) languages were more "evolved" than Arabic, while Arabic had archaic features, not only archaic compared to bibilical Hebrew, Ethiopic, "Aramaic" contemporary "semetic" languages, but even archaic compared to languages from ancient antiquity; Ugaritic, Akkadain. What is meant here by Archaic is not what most readers think, it is Archaic not in the sense that it is simple, but rather that it is complex (think Latin to pig Latin or Italian or Old English, which had genders and case endings to modern English), not only grammatically, but also phonetically; All the so called semitic languages are supposed to have evolved from protosemetic, the Alphabet for protosemitic is that of the so called Ancient South Arabian (which interestingly corresponds with the traditional Arabic origins account) and has 28 Phonemes. Arabic has 28 phonemes. Hebrew has 22, same as Aramaic, and other "semitic" languages. Now pause for a second and think about it, how come Arabic, a language that is supposed to have come so late has the same number of letters as a language that supposedly predates it by over a millennium (Musnad script ~1300 BCE). Not only is the glossary of phonemes more diverse than any other semitic language, but the grammar is more complex, containing more cases and retains what's linguists noted for its antiquity, broken plurals. Indeed, a linguist has once noted that if one were to take everything we know about languages and how they develop, Arabic is older than Akkadian (~2500 BCE).
|Classical Arabic | 28 consonants, 29 with Hamza and 6 vowels; some consonants are emphatic or pharyngealized; some vowels are marked with diacritics | Complex system of word formation based on roots and patterns; roots are sequences of consonants that carry the basic meaning of a word; patterns are sequences of vowels and affixes that modify the meaning and function of a word | Flexible word order, but VSO is most common; SVO is also possible; subject and object are marked by case endings (-u for nominative, -a for accusative, -i for genitive); verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different moods and aspects |
| Akkadian | 22 consonants and 3 vowels; some consonants are glottalized or palatalized; vowels are not marked | Similar system, but with different roots and patterns; some roots have more than three consonants; some patterns have infixes or reduplication | Fixed word order of SVO; subject and object are not marked by case endings, but by prepositions or word order; verb agrees with subject in person, number, and gender; verb has different forms for different tenses and aspects |
| Aramaic | 22 consonants and 3 vowels (later variants have more); no emphatic or pharyngealized consonants (except in some dialects); vowels are not marked (except in later variants such as Syriac) | Simple system of word formation based on prefixes and suffixes; some roots or patterns exist, but are less productive than in Arabic or Akkadian |
Arabic is the only corollary to proto-semitic, infact the whole semitic classification is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning mass between their ears. hebrew, aramaic, rest of madeup dialect continua only have 22 letters of the 29 protosemitic letters Arabic has all 29. The difference betweeen Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as that between Latin and pig latin or italian.
"Semitic" is just mumbled Arabic, really. Imagine English with a third of its letters removed and simplified grammar. That's Aramaic, Hebrew, etc. For example, combine T and D into just T; there's no need to have 2 letters. The same goes for i, e, y - they should all be just y from now on, etc., etc. Arabic is the only corollary to proto-Semitic. In fact, the whole classification of Semitic languages is nonsensical for anyone with a somewhat functioning brain. Hebrew, Aramaic, and the rest of these made-up dialect continua only have 22 letters out of the 29 proto-Semitic letters. Arabic has all 29. The difference between Arabic and the other creoles and Pidgin is the same as the difference between Latin and pig Latin or Italian. "Phoenician" is an Arabic dialect continuum, and not only that, it is pidgin. It is simplified to the point of stupidity. Anyone with a basic knowledge of Arabic would see this clearly. What happened was that Arabic handicapped "scholars" saw the equivalent of Scottish Twitter spelling, with added mumbling due to phonemic mergers (22 letters, not 29), and mistakenly thought they were seeing a different language."
God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.
Salam sister Alexa, keep up the good work.
Asslam o Allikum Sister , May Allah give ( specially me) , u and all of us strength to follow Islam, my Duas are for u
MASHALLAH JAZAKALLAH KHAIR, plz do podcast with revert sisters which would benefit alot of people besides being more entertaining
keep going. may Allah reward you sister.
Asalamu alaykum
Amazing video sister. Haven’t seen your videos for a bit. May Allah bring through your work many to Islam
❤❤❤❤
Assalamu alaikum sister. Welcome to the light of Islam. May Allah swt guide you and guide us.
Thank you, waiting for the next video
MashaAllah
Will done nice job 😊
welcome to straight path of live my sister and may God all mighty make it easy on your journey Amen
Agreed sister. God is the Most Loving, the Most Merciful. He doesn’t need the sacrifice of an innocent human being in order to forgive mankind for their sins. Human sacrifice is pagan/satanic origin.
May God help you are on the right
Masha Allah.....I love your contents sister
Dua all time Sister
Subhanallah
so touching :)
Assalaam Sister. This is Uncle Mohamed * May Allah reward you with Janat alfirdwas for the Dawah... * Your analyses are sound and well founded alhamdulillah * Regarding Matthew C 16 V 15 + 16 +17 * The son of God in the Bible most certainly does not mean the son of God as Christians believe * If the son of God meant what our Christian brothers and sisters believe, they- the Christians- will MOST CERTAINLY have a huge and a bigger problem as there are - if not thousands- but tens of thousands of sons of God in the bible * It would suffice to read the bible to find out * By way of instance Exodus C 4 V 22 reads : And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn: * Hope this is of help inchallah
Trinitarians are inoculated from rationality, facts and logic. It is no surprise that basic reasoning is entirely lost on those that believe that the creator became one of those he created in order to save the created from his own self. Not to mention the incoherence in the scripture, never minding the creed itself.
Matthew 4:1) Jesus was tempted
[James 1:13) God cannot be tempted
(John 1:29) Jesus was seen
(1 John 4:12) No man has ever seen God
(Acts 2:22) Jesus was and is a man, sent by God
(Numbers 23:19, Hosea 11:9) God is not a man
(Hebrews 5:8-9) Jesus had to grow and learn
(Isaiah 40:28) God doesn't ever need to learn
(1 Corinthians 15: 3-4) Jesus Died
(1 Timothy 1:17) God cannot die
(Hebrews 5:7) Jesus needed salvation
(Luke 1:37) God doesn't need salvation
(John 4:6) Jesus grew weary
(Isaiah 40:28) God cannot grow weary
(Mark 4:38) Jesus slept
(Psalm 121: 2-4) God doesn't sleep
(John 5:19) Jesus wasn't all powerful
(Isaiah 45: 5-7) God is all powerful
(Mark 13:32) Jesus wasn't all knowing
(Isaiah 46:9) God is all knowing
MASHALLAH JAZAKALLAH KHAIR ,thanks
👍👍
'in the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word of God"-John 1.1 .Kindly explain this
It's been explain ad nausium!!!!! Do some research and you will find what's illogical about that verse... I used to be a trinitarian well versed in the bible... reverted to Islam in 2019 alhamdulillah
@@3aeren 👍👍 Alhamdulillah
The author of the gospel of John was a fraud, a fake and a dupe.
The anonymous author of the Bible’s Gospel of John and 1 John, 2 John and 3 John is described in those texts as an eyewitness to the life of Jesus. Historically, researchers studying the works have not found evidence of the author’s identity or the existence of the community the author seems to address in his works.
One major difference between the first three gospels - Matthew, Mark and Luke - and the last gospel, John, is that in John, Jesus suddenly becomes a god.😮
During his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God, and ... none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. ...
You do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, or the last Gospel. Jesus says things like, "Before Abraham was, I am." And, "I and the Father are one," and, "If you've seen me, you've seen the Father." These are all statements you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier gospels and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things. ...
I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. This is not an unusual view amongst scholars; it's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understanding of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate.
@@miningproductions319 i like your comment 👍👍
@@KartOno-tj6uv thank you.
Sister, Bible rightly said I and Father are one, on purpose because, to give guidance to mankind by giving revelation to Jesus (PBH) from Almighty God.
👍
Assalaam Sister. This is Uncle Mohamed again 🙂 * Regarding John C 10 V 30 * Jesus PBUHP and GOD / Allah AWJ are one in purpose not as one entity * The purpose is that you cannot remove those who follow God or Jesus PBUH from them once they have believed * Please start reading from John C 10 V 24 to V 34 * and V 34 is very interesting for our Christian brothers and sisters: as Christians should worship Jews 🙂
33:48 Isn't this the experience of Ibrahim A.S. in searching for his God?
Sister you need to do a podcast with SNEAKO. it will increase ur reach to non muslims who might be helped by ur knowledge and insights.
No, she shouldn't talk with men
I mean its behind a screen. @@xS146roar
السلام علیکم و رحمۃ اللہ و برکاتہ محترمہ بہن الیکسا Alexa
I request and advise you to please dub your this VLOG in Urdu language and upload on your RUclips channel so that Urdu speaking Muslims / people of the world especially of sub continent ( India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka etc.) may also be benefitted from your valuable Islamic research on Islam / Quran... Thank you very much and I pray for you and your family members to be blessed day and night and I also pray ALLAH TAALA to keep you and all Muslims on Islam till death, Aameen summa Aameen.
Don't For me the biggest error is the massive difference in the 2 accounts of how Judas died.
99% of born Muslims follow Islam blindly. We us as born Muslims only recite the Quran in Arbic don’t read it with translation. Just follow so called maoulanas scholars . Don’t use sour mind . We have preserved brain lol 😆
Masha Allah revert Muslims thousands time better then a born Muslim . May Allah bless you sister.
There’s way more contradictions in the Quran than the Bible.
Why you not read this, In quran is written in surah ayan Maryam chapter 19 verse 83 saying Do you ˹O Prophet˺ not see that We have sent the devils against the disbelievers, constantly inciting them? Do you not see that We have sent the devils to the unbelievers, inciting them to sin?
This written by muhammad that Allah sent satan to disbeliever to push unbeliever to become evil
What is the relationship of Allah and satan because he sent.
Is this verse connected to hadith book is written in sahih al bukhari 4848, book 65, hadith 369 saying in narrated anas: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The people will be thrown into the (Hell) Fire and it will say: "Are there any more (to come)?' (50.30) till Allah puts His Foot over it and it will say, 'Qati! Qati! (Enough Enough!)'".
Allah's Statement: "...It (Hell) will say: 'Are there any more (to come)?" (V.50:30)
Would love to hear your perspective comparing witchcraft to Islam
basedmuslimbo...or what ever is your i.d! These 2 are not comparable. Islam is revelation, lights life. Black magic is the exact opposite.
Keep Palestine in du'a and donate, but protesting isn't in sunnah... why ask oppressors, some who haven't changed, instead teach those who don't know & will listen and teach those who know practical solutions like the first two.
---
she was a wich at 11, at 13 pagan, left at 21, met w. supremo who warns of Muslims so she read Quran in 2015 and it overwhelmed her.
She was a superstitious monotheist in 2016, in 2017 read a so called holy bible, Old T was called new english bible written from prysbyterian, anglican and catholic clergy sopposedly translated from early manuscripts.
she thought being "paulist" would be more familiar culturally!
many paulist say cruciFICTION is needed for atonement... she asked how about bc?
She read story of Jona when younger. Old T. says Jona was angry and wanted God to punish them, ppl of Miniva...
so idea cruciFICTION was needed doesn't add up regarding forgiveness.
Ibrahim 's son of sacrifices Ismail in Islam, Ishaq in bible.
10 :00 -
lamb or ram is taken as a replacement.
paulists say this sacrifice removes Ibrahim following the law, but it contradicts Moses's entire ministry up to even Jesus & other stories of the prophets being forgiven...
she speaks of how Jesus's last words are contradiction & opposites mathew 27.46 & luke 23.46, this shows lack or reliability of the gospel, what else is missing?
No Gospel has both lines, each has 1/2, why?
(Even Mark 15.40, mathew 27.55 & luke 23.46 all say Jesus's crew is at distant, so did they really see Jesus in a cruci-FICTION)
she brings up son of man claim. numbers 23.19 says God is not a man or son of man, so this shows Jesus isn't God!
20 :00 -
Mathew 16.16 - Peter says though are Christ son of...
Mark 8.29 & 30 - Peter says You are christ, and Jesus says don't tell anyone... but doesn't have son of God...
So did Mathew add the son of God part?
She says son and father are different things, and contradictions must come from the authros, gospels are not written by eyewitnesses, but collections of rumors.
It's not just Muslims who call the trinity pagan... the trinity is a bc pagan model.
she says Odin was a triune deity!
Wicka which is 20th century w-craft. Moon of maiden, mother & crown - again triune!
Words mean things, is water & Nar the same.
30 :00 -
Says the contradictory nature of Jesus was psychadellic.
God & Man are opposites of opposites
and doesn't sound like God of Abraham & Moses!
this bothered her... when her son was 6 months she prayed how can ppl want to worship God but worship messiah.
she said God allowed her to answer her question (guided her).
She then remembered the Quran she read corrects the bible! She said it was like a breeze cooling her. Re REading and accepting Quran won her over fully!
said the first time reading the Quran was like looking at the sun when she returned to the cave then went to the bible as it's easier on her eyes but then went out back to the light!
She researched Islam, HAdith Jibril, life of JEsus and Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him and then jumped in!
Took shahada alone in 2018 and then tried to learn to pray, separated w/ babie's father and studied more!
Now Islam makes her healthy and stable!
WA aLeikum Asalam!
If there was a human being who deserved to be worshiped then he was your mother who carried you weighing -+2-3 kg for 9 months, during your pregnancy your mother could never sleep soundly, imagine your body being tied with a burden weighing -+2-3 kg for 9 months. And when your mother gave birth to you, she sacrificed her blood and even her life in excruciating pain. and while raising you, your mother had to be willing to sleep a little at night because you often woke up crying at night and could only calm down after being breastfed by your mother and this all went on for -+ 2 years and your mother was willing to clean up your feces and urine. and it lasted for -+ 5 years Your mother willingly suffered for you for years... Every human being is gifted by the Almighty Creator with a tool to detect wrong and right accurately. When we tell lies then the "Heart" really knows what we say is a lie. When we steal or rob, the "Heart" really knows that we are making a mistake. But unfortunately, we often ignore and don't want to listen to the voice of our "heart" because of our desires, greed and anger, hatred, so that we don't realize that we are deceiving and torturing ourselves.
😋 "promosm"
☝️A/S If you start using intelligence given by God then it is kinda impossible to become Christian. And i am happy that you don't believe in shias and barelwis( indian version of sufism). They both believe that passed away auliyas in barzakh can help muslims by the permission of Allah. This aqeedah is totally against holy Quran and authentic hadiths.
Let me quotes contradictions
verses in the Bible here is comes
Undoubtedly mistakes in the Bible
2 King 24-8
Jehoiachin was eighteen years old when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem three months. And his mother's name was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem.
2 chronicles 36-9
Jehoiachin was eight years old when he began to reign, and he reigned three months and ten days in Jerusalem: and he did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD.
WAS HE 18 YEARS OLD WHEN HE REGN OR WAS HE 8 YEARS OLD. WHICH ONE IS CORRECT BOTH CAN NOT BE CORRECT.
2 King 8-26
Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Athaliah, the daughter of Omri king of Israel.
2 chronicles 22-2
Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother's name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.
WAS HE 22 YEARS OLD OR WAS HE 42 YEARS OLD. BOTH CAN NOT BE CORRECT.
Do you know what are you trying to do, you are causing people in other universe to think. You have caused great harm to lots of people and destroyed their thinking. You have thrown a giant stone in clam water and created a repel effect i am afraid your explanation will make rethink their vision and belief.