Language vs Vision: What's harder to solve? | Ishan Misra and Lex Fridman
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 июл 2021
- Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Ishan Misra: Self-Supe...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- Onnit: lexfridman.com/onnit to get up to 10% off
- The Information: theinformation.com/lex to get 75% off first month
- Grammarly: grammarly.com/lex to get 20% off premium
- Athletic Greens: athleticgreens.com/lex and use code LEX to get 1 month of fish oil
GUEST BIO:
Ishan Misra is a research scientist at FAIR working on self-supervised visual learning.
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
SOCIAL:
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridman
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Reddit: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman 
Наука
Makes sense. If the robot can't see me sneaking up behind it to unplug it then they can't really take over
Without language, you get instinct.... so for survival this is fine, but for working in groups, creating and transferring knowledge you need something like language or writing. The lack of this leaves room for only better suited designs, more ferocious instincts which at some point are diminishing returns. I don't want AI and robots to be superhumanly fast and reactive but not provide or store anything of use other than genetic algorithms to improve the latter. Even cuneiform in clay tablets stored and transferred knowledge.
Advanced AI will integrate both, even if the challenge for us in making computer vision is higher, the value is not as tangible.
I think they'll fundamentally become the same problem. These notions of language and object detection are human and our sensory organs don't operate independently.
Right. Think of when language was first being used. It was to convey something we were seeing. Food, Danger, Shelter, etc...
I just had the worst lsd Tripp before this
whatcha see?
When you're awake, share more lol
Language is way more convoluted than vision.
I disagree. Many animals developed vision, but only humans developed language. If vision were harder than language, all animals would have language while only smart animals would see. Nature shows us the exact opposite: many animals can see but language is reserved for the few smart animals (mostly humans, though dolphins and chimpanzees demonstrate some language)
When you're communicating you are make assumptions about what the other might understand and the though the other is trying to pass to you. Some patients who lost the ability to speak coherent sentences were still able to understand what others were saying. Maybe, language is a tool to pass thoughts in ways other could interpretate, but other part of our intelligence is complementary to it? I don't know.
I think he refers to language as words only, but separating it from the thought translation our brain does. Vision can be more complex, not because it "requires more intelligence", but because of the whole image processing it needs to get the information right.
I don't think either are particularly difficult challenges, it's but a matter of organization.
What's your iQ if you think none of this is difficult? Lol
@@icemancometh1188 IQ =/ self regard lol
@@icemancometh1188 I grew up listening to Christopher Hitchens and I am who I am now.
@@Chaosdude341 I'm a fan of Hitch too. These are difficult problems though. I was just wondering if you were a bonafide genius lol
@@icemancometh1188 self referring polymath. Wbu?
if you had quantum computers say its one brain and it as,different sub structures to learn, you gave vision as we have it would learn by itself like a baby it would build up its own data base like we do site, language, smells , i always say simplify a problem the universe does 👍