Ex Homeopath Reveals the Truth About Homeopathy | Arif Hussain Theruvath

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 31

  • @19-dhrubajyotimanna92
    @19-dhrubajyotimanna92 10 месяцев назад +4

    Most of the failed people often blame the system...as they cannot accept their own failure...

    • @sajitdaniel
      @sajitdaniel 6 месяцев назад +1

      You think he is failed Homeopath? Hahah.... He had a thriving practice. He is a very highly respected individual.

  • @venkataraghavand655
    @venkataraghavand655 2 месяца назад +2

    I have tried homoepathy in the past and the first thing they said was you have to believe in this medicine. So I was wondering if this is really medicine. This has clarified my suspicion

  • @smithahumanist
    @smithahumanist Год назад +3

    Thank you Abhijit Chadda 🎉Appreciate your effort in spreading the valuable messages from the science community across-the-board.
    Arif was really resourceful in explaining the best about homeopathic practices(placebo/ineffective)...
    Time and time again we meet someone who ardently support homeopathy😢..and it's a good reminder.
    Kindly bring him back for more detailed information on the pseudoscience practices in India. ❤

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад +1

      That’s the plan! Thanks so much for your support!

  • @AmarDamani
    @AmarDamani Год назад +2

    Discovered you channel cause of dr. abby philips, clicked the video just to upvote it, but stayed and lsitened the entire podcast.. Keep up the good work...

    • @rationable
      @rationable  11 месяцев назад

      Hey I’m so glad! I’d love it if you would subscribe. I’ve got much more content like this coming very soon.

  • @whatsup3519
    @whatsup3519 Год назад +1

    1 simple question. Not related to this topic why economical prediction made by economists always fail? Is there any reason for that? How to test economical theory? Why things in paper didn't Work in reality even it sound logical. Is there any reason for that? Expecting your reply

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад +1

      I haven’t delved into economics since I was in college, so you would be better off discussing this in more depth with an economist.
      In my limited knowledge, economics is a study of the flow of money through a population of humans. And humans often behave in unpredictable ways as individuals and even more so as populations.
      The other aspect of your question is predictions. Predictions in science are a great way to test a theory. However, predictions in economics are far more difficult because it attempts to predict the future of human populations and how they use their money. There are a multitude of constantly changing variables like inflation, stock markets, product innovations, political policies and much more which feed into these trends. There’s no surprise then that predictions can often go wrong when you see it this way. .

    • @cauliflowerhead2735
      @cauliflowerhead2735 Год назад

      Which predictions are you talking about?

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад +1

      I’m talking about them very generally in the context of economics from a layperson’s perspective. So obviously, we can’t go into any specifics here.

    • @whatsup3519
      @whatsup3519 Год назад

      @@rationable how to avoid Middle ground fallacy? If we say truth is a or b that would be black and white fallacy. But if we say it's in middle of this 2 that is middle ground fallacy. So how to avoid such fallacy.

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад

      It really depends on the argument being made.

  • @solotravel7530
    @solotravel7530 Год назад

    How culture use to form. What are the factors which make a culture. Why two countries have different cultures and the reason behind it. Is there any basic structure to from culture. Please answer this question

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад

      The bad news is, I can't answer that, unfortunately. The good news is that there is an entire field of study called Social Anthropology which tries to answer this question. You would be much better off consulting an expert in this field to understand it better.

  • @ArjunA-ln3ov
    @ArjunA-ln3ov Месяц назад +1

    Superb

  • @faizpalakkadkerala3448
    @faizpalakkadkerala3448 Год назад

    Fair is Foul and Foul is Fair Sir😅.

  • @Ashwin_shankar_chandrabahan
    @Ashwin_shankar_chandrabahan 9 месяцев назад

    My father is MD in homeopathy.
    Back in childhood I thought homeopathy is a recognized legitimate medical science
    But soon I realized the scam of Homeopathy and ayurved

    • @rationable
      @rationable  8 месяцев назад

      I used to believe it too! I only realised it was a scam when I was around 30 years old. Better late than never right?

  • @radha94
    @radha94 Год назад +3

    Is business strategy all about inductive reasoning which we can't able to test in controlled environment. Eg. Vaccine can be tested what about economical theory. Is economical theory can't be falsified is that pseudo science.

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад +1

      I think economic theory is more of a soft science. I think there are certain aspects than can be falsified, I’m sure. plus, a lot of the aspects of economics are calculated statistically and mathematically. It’s not a pseudoscience for sure. The whole world runs on it, after all. And many aspects of demand and supply are easily demonstrated. What I’m saying is that predictions are hard here because humans don’t always act according to mathematical models. We can see trends, we can make predictions, but those predictions can be wrong.

    • @radha94
      @radha94 Год назад +1

      @@rationable so what about business in which category does it belongs to. Inductive reasoning or Deductive reasoning.

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад

      Different aspects of business would have different aspects of reasoning depending on the context. Even science uses both depending on the field and the context of the observations being made.

    • @radha94
      @radha94 Год назад

      @@rationable If inductive reasoning is based on assumption. How can we seek evidence on future without any data to bakup

    • @rationable
      @rationable  Год назад

      You’ll have to be more specific for me to really understand what your point is.

  • @NurulIslam-lx4vx
    @NurulIslam-lx4vx 2 месяца назад

    Masamu Imutu

  • @deshbhaktan
    @deshbhaktan 2 дня назад

    People should be banned from opening podcast channel. Half an hour into the show I still don't know whether this person is For homeopathy or Against it. What a waste of time.