Yes right not all women rights also but also not all women wrong so by interpersonal skills of women emotional attrocities CRPC125,354,498,24BNS can be used against with men commission support laws and to make anti men laws in india by kriminal laws judiciary
@@user-ty5en7vf5k wash your face with cold water , and look yourself in the mirror and ask the same question again and again, if youre logical reasonable compassionate moral enough to be qualified as human youll get that answer yourself ,never ever again dare to say such nonsense
@@user-ty5en7vf5k Ideally , marriage should be considered as amalgamation of heart and minds but unfortunately in India it is often due to societal pressure and a business transaction or a settlement plan.
सब कुछ लड़की के लिए है तो लड़कों के लिए क्या हैं घंटा जब लड़की जान कर स्वयं घर छोड़ कर चली गई है तो उसको कुछ नहीं मिलना चाहिए कानून सरासर घटिया और एक तरफा हैं
जो पत्नि साथ रह कर अपने कर्तव्य का पालन नहीं करती उसको भरण पोषण का अधिकार- 😀😀 सुप्रीम कोठा दुकान 😁 सैद्धांतिक रूप से विवाह जीवन संगनी की भूमिका परिवार के दुख सुख में सहभागिता से भी जुड़ा हुआ है मगर कानून के दुकानदारों ने सिर्फ अधिकार की बात की है जबकि अधिकार प्राकृतिक रूप से कर्तव्यों से सृजित किया जाता है ?
हत्यारा कानून है अनगिनत हत्याओं के लिए इस कानून के खिलाफ क्या कर रही है सरकार ? वैवाहिक जीवन की ख्वाहिश खतरनाक हो गई है तनाव और प्रतिस्पर्धा से जूझता आज के जीवन शैली में पुरूष घर में अपनी जीवन संगनी से दुख सुख में सहानुभूति और हौसला की उम्मीद रखने की जानलेवा कीमत चुका रहा है और कानून की दुकान चलाने वाले से लेकर पुलिस भी अपने धंधे में फंसने वाले को इतना जलील करती है कि विवाहित पुरुष को भविष्य में हताशा के सिवा कुछ नहीं दिखता, कानून की ये साजिश है इनकी सच्चाई यहां तक नजर आने लगी है कि पत्नी से शारीरिक संबंध बनाने वाले कानून को भी हवा दी जा चुकी है वास्तव में ये साजिश परिवार और समाज में अराजकता फैला चुके हैं ?
Legal litigation charges husband kyu de ? Court or Govt can decide lawyer for her. Accordingly to husband she is guilty and as per law husband needs to pay litigation charges... Means.. husband will pay to file cases against him. What a ridiculous logic is this. Husband has issues, so he went to court. Shameless Judiciary System.
Man with such thoughts of expecting alimony and maintenance from wife… shouldn’t marry and ruin others life … better go stay with wife s parents at their place doing household works , with nonstop tantrums and sarcasm from family members, stop working, give birth to babies. Then u ll understand why only man pay alimony, what is real shame Indian laws OR husband in-laws Its bcoz .. wife leaves everything behind her job, parents, her self respect , her life goals, her aim… even her good health , comfortable space… to be with husband and inlaws. 90% of inlaws and husband are abusive toxic. Husband and inlaws make her quit job and trouble her if she searches new job after marriage … from princess in fathers house ll bcome not less than unpaid maid with least or no respect. At inlaws house there ll be 3 to 4 members supporting each other infront of society to praise themselves and blame wife .. as she is alone to defend .. if she talks in defence she ll be called as selfish. No earnings no bank balance so no support from any relative , neighbours and friends . She gives her whole life , patience , health to a family . At the end she is left with blames with divorce. Only her breath is left take it as alimony shame on husbands and inlaws who lies, cheats, ruins wife life. 10 % of wife are also cheating and ruining their husband and inlaws … shame on such wife. Until and unless both husband and wife say truth and accept honestly this battle never ends. Justice will not be served for honest ppl until they r alive. Salute to Indian laws atleast they are putting their efforts. Shame on those husbands, wives, inlaws those who cheat. Life is not a 3 hour movie to show and prove what had happened between 4 walls. Justice should be in action not in words. Victim could be wife or husband but favours will be served only to ppl who are powerful in doing drama, saying lies, with money not for the real victim at the end of the day. Sad but true. Last but not least shame on ppl who just comments on social media for the sake of commenting without thinking.
कोर्ट को अपने फैसलों में बदलाव करना चाहिए पत्नी को भरण पोषण एक समय अवधि तक देना चाहिए जिससे वह खुद को सक्षम बना सके और जीवन भर स्वाभिमान के साथ जी सके , वह पति के ऊपर जीवन भर बोझ न रहे , यह भी गलत है कि पत्नी अलग रहने के बाद कुछ न करे l वह नया काम सीखे और समाज व परिवार के लिए कुछ करे जिसे उसे जीवन जीने का सही उद्देश्य मिले l
if dowry is illegal why would a guy has to alimony to a woman, does that mean if the guy has no job and the woman is working does she pay for the guy until sometime.
लोवर कोर्ट, पूरूषो की नहीं सूनते है। इसलिए पूरूषो को हाईकोर्ट या सूप्रिम कोर्ट में जाना चाहिए। सूप्रिम कोर्ट, अभिलेख न्यायालय है, उसके फैसले पूरे देश में लागू होते हैं। और सूप्रिम कोर्ट मौलिक अधिकारों का रक्षक है। इसलिए पूरूषो को केवल सूप्रिम कोर्ट में ही न्याय मिलता है।
maintainance khtm hona chahiye… court ko ye sec khtm krna chahiye .. agar aisa hua to lakho logo ka ghr bach jayega ho skta hai log sucide krna band kr de .. bahut maao k bete bach jayenge kisi ka bhai bach jayega kisi ka baap bach jayega 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Men shouldn't lower their standards for a girl whom they're interested or get married to. most of the women don't have minimum standard of life before marriage but these judges are becoming scammers to let a girl enjoy more standard of living than what she actually deserves.
Marriage is like going to the border wars now days, I mean abse collage me ek pura subject hona chahie 😂 jisme sikhaya jae ki kitne laws guys ke khilaf hote he
Over all ye 8 points ka matlab hai kaan seedha pakdo ya ghuma k pakdo, katna aadmi ho he hai isme. Kisi bhi 1 point me husband k favor ki koi baat he nhi hai.
I am going through divorce I am working in defence posted at border area within 15 days of marriage this year she started fighting abusing saying worst worst words to me , my mother can't even describe here Moreover she even tortured my parents physically I even have MLC report And now court is asking me that I have to prove my innocence and she is sitting at her place with parents watching everything as an entertainment As per these rules why should I pay litigation charges What about this rule that she did the cruelty but still I am the one under DV case Everything is still a rule just to help girl how to extort money
ये नियम कोई नया नहीं है अतुल जैसे कितने हि मासूम क़ानून कि बलि चढ़ चुके है, 498A और 376 को ठिक करने के बजाय व्याभिचार और अनैतिक शारीरिक संबंध को मान्यता दे दी अब और क्या बचा उनकी गोदी मीडिया से पूछ रहा हूं आपलोग उनसे पूछिए ऐसा क्यों किया
Remove 498 a !!! Also if wife files a false case, there shd be a law where she should be facing imprisonment... The laws are women friendly. The law shd be equal for men and women. Save husbands from harresment from wives!!!!!!
Sir mens are assumed criminal s as per law.Evidence ka 2 nd stage aur uskeke baad hi decide kiya jaaye.aajkal patni hi khud ghar chhod rahi hai uss par courts kabhi kuch bolta nahi.
These points are not new, they already exist in our Indian laws, but never followed by our respected judiciaries in resolving any cases of divorces, alimony or maintainance.
Justice for men is biased in India.. our legal system is complacent in delivering justice without considering the agony and mental stress of the men and his family
These laws are totally against men in todays time. The society has changed women can find a job to maintain herself. Why husband pay allimony shame on judi judiciary.
People admit that about 98 pc cases in such matters are fake, motivated and has intention to pressurise and blackmail...but no one is doing anything to give justice to the victimized men.. Shame on the system.. Shame on the judiciary which not only watches from a distance but also becomes part of the system..
Why does only husband pay maintenance?? If one has to listen to this unfair judiciary, then govt should pay 80% and husband pay20%, as it happens with insurance cases.
How do these discourage false allegations on husbands by women? Don't lawyers themselves suggest the women to appeal such allegations? What's going to discourage such lawyers now? Husbands are not money making machine, even if they are successful. Stop treating them like banks.
What if. 1. Marriage lasted for only 10 months 2. No children 3. Wife giving threats of suicide to force inlaws to live as per hers and her mother's way.. 4. A fake attempt at suicide leading to hospitalization and MLC. ( No case registered ). Girl is living with her parents since then and Has filed a DV case against inlaws Matter in lingering in Distict Court for last 2.5 years. Please advice on Maintenace and Alimony in such case.
The main thing the Supreme Court missed to mention in the guidelines is that no maintenance for commiting crime like filing false case or submitting false information by wife. For false case there should be rigorous punishment to wives.
We are not allowed to say anything everything depends on the advocate Wat they. Judge should see that the Oppsite party comes in the court and gives all the details truthfully and does not cheat the court and the party who has filed the case. Is it true that the one who has filed the case has to be present on all the date and opposite party can sit at home and enjoy till the case is over.
Just on Dec 23,2024 my friend got divorce after mutual consent.. the marriage fell apart within 1 year of marriage obvi because of some issues from girl's side due to which they agreed for mutual divorce.. but the worst part was it was the judge who was suggesting girl to ask for alimony...
भारतीय न्यायपालिका व्यवस्था बिलकुल सड़-गल गया है, गुजाराभत्ता पुरुष ही क्यों देगा? शिक्षित महिला नौकरी कर के आत्मनिर्भर क्यों नही बनना चाहती है? उनके पितृसत्ता से संपति क्यों नही मांगते है? पति को ATM मशीन क्यों समझा जा रहा है? पत्नी हमेशा से पति के उपर बोझ क्यों बनना चाहती है, क्या यही इक्विलिटी है?
The lower court does not respect supreme courts....these factors have been defined already a long time ago but lower courts work at their own and do not follow any rules, constitution and supreme court guidelines....!!!
लग्न करणे गून्हा आहे का जर गून्हा आहे तर दोघानी ही लग्न करूण गून्हा केलाय मग बाईला च का एवढ महत्व दोघाला ही सेम सजा पाहीजे पैसा देण बदं केल की गप्प गूण्यागोविदाने नादल
Or ha meri wakil logo se dono hath jodke 🙏🙏🙏🙏 reqst hai sach ko janne k baad hi ap log case apne hath le, kisi k zindagi ka sawal a jata hai, kyu ki ajkal paisa hi sabkuch nh hota, ghar paribar paiso se badhkar hota hai, ek maa ne ek papa ne apna beta kho dia hain ( atul subhash) .
Sir cruelty kerney bali bahu ka maintenance sasural ka gold alimony sab baad hona chahiye in ka case b transfer nahi hona chahiye cruelty kerney bali bahu ko jail mi dalo ager ladko cruelty karta hi toh usko jail hota toh bahu ko b jail hona chahiye
Still maintdnance is favouring wives.Maintenance must be for a limiyed period and should also be decided on duratiom of marriagr and educational qualification of wives
If a girl comes from lower ground...to upper one ... she can also adjust in lower ground again... The one who comes from lower to upper immediately....their brain dont work properly 😂 by seeing money
Whether a husband who is not earning or earning less than his wife is also entitled to to claim maintenance and alimony from his wife.Tha law shall be made gender neutral otherwise males will not marry females and will prefer live in which is against interests of the country and sanatan family system .jai hind
Etna sab naatak sirf ladkeyo ky ley.. ladko kaa kya.. patni agar bena kese reason ky gae hy too kya? Uska court ney kuch nahe bola.. sab mela jula ky patni koo pysa doo.. PURUSH AAYOG CHAHEY
Thanks for this video Sir, but ye sabe points sunke mein confuse ho gayaa. Not sure if anything will change. Most of the points are subjective which can differ person to person as well as judges to judges. Ek raw example de sakte ho kya in coming videos to analyse the benefits of these amendments. like take any case where alumni has been declared & as per you what supposed be the revised/new alumni amount after considering these points. So that it will help us to understand whether it's going to add any value. Also anything about the fake cases/claims/charges & cruelty from wife side where there are no punishments ?
Agar koi patni apni pati k upor fake case karti hain (498)A or agar wo patni jhuti sabit nikli to pati ko v haq banta hai k wo alimony mange or esa mange k us patni k hosh ud jaye. Jaise mard suffer karte hai waise aurat o ko v wo dard wo pain feel honi cahiye, after all laws sabke lea ek jaisa hona cahiye.
Basically what Supreme Court has done is that all files were taken out of the rules and they were dusted and retyped using ChatGPT to sound a little milder for the man. It’s all the same said in a slightly different and helpful tone. Why 498 hasn’t been touched at all? First step after 498 is filed is for Police to give an affidavit that they have fully investigated the case and everything is correct and can proceed ahead on it.
When they dont want husband, Shamelessly why they want his property or monthly salary as alimony. Better a marriage agreement is entered before marrying. For paying alimony, what will be the contribution by lady after divorce ? Will she looks after her husband's parents after his death ? Can the deceased husband's parents claim maintenance from her after divorce. ?? If this trend continues, better for men not to have any property and resign the job. Or become a culprit and get jailed.
Wife before divorce: Itne saalo me mujhe kahi ghumane nahi le gaye Wife after divorce: Hum har saal foreign tour pe jaate the Mujhe same lifestyle maintain karke ke liye har saal foreign tour ke liye 2 lakh rs Milne chahiye 😂😂😂😂
Jonpur lower court judge ko suspend karo, life time jail karo, Atul ke opposite advocates ki Sanad rad karo, des vyapi pidit purush sangathan lekar supreme court & parliament ke aage aandolan karo
Each case is different. Urban working women need no alimony.equality is a must.Most women are not not harassing husbands but also in laws.The situation is no longer what it was earlier,do lawd mudt change to safeguard husbands,kids and family.
आजकल औरतों का बहुत अच्छा बिजनेस हो गया है ऐसा दिखाई देता है शादी करो टच मत करने दो उसके बाद मोटी रकम को और उसको छोड़ दो इसमें उसके मां बाप भी शामिल होते हैं
I think an element of contradiction will still prevail where one point is saying about catering to the basic needs of wife and children and their future and the other point is again pointing to the providing equal Social and Economic Status as that of the husband. Instead, I would have expected from the supreme court that it would be a non bailable offence for wife if 498A charges brought by her can't be proved in the court and it would be treated as a cruelty against husband while deciding the alimony. In that way the misuse of this can be stopped to a significant instant. I would rather be happy if the Supreme Court laid down a minimal list of duties of a wife as well in her in-law's house when they had already entitling the duty of the husband to take care and run the of the family as per social and economic statuses thru these points.
Nice presentation
Keep it on.
IPC SECTION 498A AND CRPC SECTION 125 &127 AND ALIMONY MUST BE ABOLISHED FOREVER.
Yes right not all women rights also but also not all women wrong so by interpersonal skills of women emotional attrocities CRPC125,354,498,24BNS can be used against with men commission support laws and to make anti men laws in india by kriminal laws judiciary
@RohitRaj-bu3vg Right
@RohitRaj-bu3vg 100% case is false
Agreed
Also the provison of imprisonment of women should be included
JUSTICE IS DUE
Patni jab jute case karke mentenence lena catihe tab supreme court keya kare ga.😢
@@rajeshsaha8055 change law
Supreme court knows everything but still they favour women.
Shameless judicial system in india
@@himanshumusic5784 bilkul sahi kaha
# Justice for all Men.
Shameless Judiciary
weakest pillar of our democracy .
Justice is due
Judiciary and journalism. These are corrupted areas of democracy.
So y man wants to marry? After divorce what women get . No house , no y0ung life , no young body back . In all these what man lose? Nothing
@@user-ty5en7vf5k wash your face with cold water , and look yourself in the mirror and ask the same question again and again, if youre logical reasonable compassionate moral enough to be qualified as human youll get that answer yourself ,never ever again dare to say such nonsense
@@user-ty5en7vf5k Ideally , marriage should be considered as amalgamation of heart and minds but unfortunately in India it is often due to societal pressure and a business transaction or a settlement plan.
ab to rules improve kr diye! ab kis baat ki itni jyada shame kr rhe ho?
Justice is due for Atul and all husbands who are suffering from fake cases 😭
सब कुछ लड़की के लिए है तो लड़कों के लिए क्या हैं घंटा जब लड़की जान कर स्वयं घर छोड़ कर चली गई है तो उसको कुछ नहीं मिलना चाहिए कानून सरासर घटिया और एक तरफा हैं
जो पत्नि साथ रह कर अपने कर्तव्य का पालन नहीं करती उसको भरण पोषण का अधिकार-
😀😀 सुप्रीम कोठा दुकान 😁
सैद्धांतिक रूप से विवाह जीवन संगनी की भूमिका परिवार के दुख सुख में सहभागिता से भी जुड़ा हुआ है मगर कानून के दुकानदारों ने सिर्फ अधिकार की बात की है जबकि अधिकार प्राकृतिक रूप से कर्तव्यों से सृजित किया जाता है ?
हत्यारा कानून है अनगिनत हत्याओं के लिए इस कानून के खिलाफ क्या कर रही है सरकार ?
वैवाहिक जीवन की ख्वाहिश खतरनाक हो गई है तनाव और प्रतिस्पर्धा से जूझता आज के जीवन शैली में पुरूष घर में अपनी जीवन संगनी से दुख सुख में सहानुभूति और हौसला की उम्मीद रखने की जानलेवा कीमत चुका रहा है और कानून की दुकान चलाने वाले से लेकर पुलिस भी अपने धंधे में फंसने वाले को इतना जलील करती है कि विवाहित पुरुष को भविष्य में हताशा के सिवा कुछ नहीं दिखता, कानून की ये साजिश है इनकी सच्चाई यहां तक नजर आने लगी है कि पत्नी से शारीरिक संबंध बनाने वाले कानून को भी हवा दी जा चुकी है वास्तव में ये साजिश परिवार और समाज में अराजकता फैला चुके हैं ?
Right
One sided law
पत्नी ने छोड़ा,तो पति को एलुमिनी मिलना चाहिए
Mera ek sujav hai...
shadi dono ekdujhe ke sath karte hai fir divorce ke time ladki ko bhi admi ko paise dene chahiye
yehi hogi asli equality 🤘😂
@@RealTalk_Clips0.1 India ke bahar aisa hi he. Ladki bhi maintenance deti he.
Legal litigation charges husband kyu de ? Court or Govt can decide lawyer for her. Accordingly to husband she is guilty and as per law husband needs to pay litigation charges... Means.. husband will pay to file cases against him. What a ridiculous logic is this. Husband has issues, so he went to court. Shameless Judiciary System.
जब तक संसद में अनपढ़ गंवार नेता बैठेंगे तब तक ऐसे ही घटिया कानून बनते रहेंगे।...
Men should unite against any kind of maintenance, litigation charges...
Why only man pay alumany, shame on Indian laws.
Man with such thoughts of expecting alimony and maintenance from wife… shouldn’t marry and ruin others life … better go stay with wife s parents at their place doing household works , with nonstop tantrums and sarcasm from family members, stop working, give birth to babies. Then u ll understand why only man pay alimony, what is real shame Indian laws OR husband in-laws
Its bcoz .. wife leaves everything behind her job, parents, her self respect , her life goals, her aim… even her good health , comfortable space… to be with husband and inlaws. 90% of inlaws and husband are abusive toxic.
Husband and inlaws make her quit job and trouble her if she searches new job after marriage … from princess in fathers house ll bcome not less than unpaid maid with least or no respect.
At inlaws house there ll be 3 to 4 members supporting each other infront of society to praise themselves and blame wife .. as she is alone to defend .. if she talks in defence she ll be called as selfish. No earnings no bank balance so no support from any relative , neighbours and friends .
She gives her whole life , patience , health to a family . At the end she is left with blames with divorce.
Only her breath is left take it as alimony shame on husbands and inlaws who lies, cheats, ruins wife life.
10 % of wife are also cheating and ruining their husband and inlaws … shame on such wife.
Until and unless both husband and wife say truth and accept honestly this battle never ends. Justice will not be served for honest ppl until they r alive. Salute to Indian laws atleast they are putting their efforts. Shame on those husbands, wives, inlaws those who cheat. Life is not a 3 hour movie to show and prove what had happened between 4 walls. Justice should be in action not in words.
Victim could be wife or husband but favours will be served only to ppl who are powerful in doing drama, saying lies, with money not for the real victim at the end of the day.
Sad but true.
Last but not least shame on ppl who just comments on social media for the sake of commenting without thinking.
कोर्ट को अपने फैसलों में बदलाव करना चाहिए पत्नी को भरण पोषण एक समय अवधि तक देना चाहिए जिससे वह खुद को सक्षम बना सके और जीवन भर स्वाभिमान के साथ जी सके , वह पति के ऊपर जीवन भर बोझ न रहे , यह भी गलत है कि पत्नी अलग रहने के बाद कुछ न करे l वह नया काम सीखे और समाज व परिवार के लिए कुछ करे जिसे उसे जीवन जीने का सही उद्देश्य मिले l
if dowry is illegal why would a guy has to alimony to a woman, does that mean if the guy has no job and the woman is working does she pay for the guy until sometime.
पूरे देश को एक होना होगा नया कानून जब तक न बन जाए पुरुषों के हित में
If wife lodge falls case against husband, then no maintenance no alimony will get from husband.
This is good point. 👌
is this implemented ?
Wrong
JUSTICE FOR ATUL SUBHASH
Stop Alimony, These Guidelines are useless.
Stop dowry
Absolutely right.
@@AmitTab-g2e dowry already stopped, doesn't matter whether u take or doesn't take dowry, but still alimony exists. keep update urself.
@@AmitTab-g2e arrest the wife and her father for giving dowry
@@pratiksingh1653 right
Don't be husband. A husband has to pay mony for the anemy animy advocate. How much unfair it is!
Need justice for him and all man need equal rights 😢
आपकी सब बात मानी किंतु ट्रायल कोर्ट कंहा मानती है । मेंटेनेंस मांगने के लिये ही 498A का सहारा लेती है ।
लोवर कोर्ट, पूरूषो की नहीं सूनते है।
इसलिए पूरूषो को हाईकोर्ट या सूप्रिम कोर्ट में जाना चाहिए।
सूप्रिम कोर्ट, अभिलेख न्यायालय है, उसके फैसले पूरे देश में लागू होते हैं।
और सूप्रिम कोर्ट मौलिक अधिकारों का रक्षक है।
इसलिए पूरूषो को केवल सूप्रिम कोर्ट में ही न्याय मिलता है।
@@SaveHumanity9999 हाँ । कुछ नहीं सबके चारे चिन्दी लगे हैं । ऐसा नहीं हो तो वकील भूखे मरेंगे ।
maintainance khtm hona chahiye… court ko ye sec khtm krna chahiye .. agar aisa hua to lakho logo ka ghr bach jayega ho skta hai log sucide krna band kr de .. bahut maao k bete bach jayenge kisi ka bhai bach jayega kisi ka baap bach jayega 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Her maintenance should be decided as per her parental life style if divorce is within 5 years.
Men shouldn't lower their standards for a girl whom they're interested or get married to. most of the women don't have minimum standard of life before marriage but these judges are becoming scammers to let a girl enjoy more standard of living than what she actually deserves.
Marriage is like going to the border wars now days, I mean abse collage me ek pura subject hona chahie 😂 jisme sikhaya jae ki kitne laws guys ke khilaf hote he
@@SriM8055 so that judges will give chance to men victims, either to pay huge corruption to them or pay huge/unexpected Alimony till death.
Over all ye 8 points ka matlab hai kaan seedha pakdo ya ghuma k pakdo, katna aadmi ho he hai isme. Kisi bhi 1 point me husband k favor ki koi baat he nhi hai.
तो क्या विधवा सांस का सटेंडर ,,देखा जाएगा,,,, ओर बहूओ को दिलाया जाएगा,, पत्नी छुप कर कमाई करती है,,,छुपाती क्यों हैं,,,,सजा दी जाए,,,,,भारती ❤️❤️❤️
Kya badla hai new guidelines k hisab se bhi to sab kuch ektarfa aur bas patniyo k hi favour me hai aur ladko ke liye kya bas jhunjhuna 😢
Right 👍
kuchh ni badlaa hey...., ye sab bakwas hey...in all false cases maintenance is there that to be stopped.
What kind of useless points these are. They have mentioned parents at last. Why husband need to pay her advocate fees? What the hell.....
All Law against mens.
I am going through divorce
I am working in defence posted at border area within 15 days of marriage this year she started fighting abusing saying worst worst words to me , my mother can't even describe here
Moreover she even tortured my parents physically I even have MLC report
And now court is asking me that I have to prove my innocence and she is sitting at her place with parents watching everything as an entertainment
As per these rules why should I pay litigation charges
What about this rule that she did the cruelty but still I am the one under DV case
Everything is still a rule just to help girl how to extort money
ये नियम कोई नया नहीं है अतुल जैसे कितने हि मासूम क़ानून कि बलि चढ़ चुके है, 498A और 376 को ठिक करने के बजाय व्याभिचार और अनैतिक शारीरिक संबंध को मान्यता दे दी अब और क्या बचा उनकी गोदी मीडिया से पूछ रहा हूं आपलोग उनसे पूछिए ऐसा क्यों किया
Instead of giving guidelines, supreme Court should quash alimony / maintenance law
Remove 498 a !!! Also if wife files a false case, there shd be a law where she should be facing imprisonment... The laws are women friendly. The law shd be equal for men and women. Save husbands from harresment from wives!!!!!!
Sir mens are assumed criminal s as per law.Evidence ka 2 nd stage aur uskeke baad hi decide kiya jaaye.aajkal patni hi khud ghar chhod rahi hai uss par courts kabhi kuch bolta nahi.
These points are not new, they already exist in our Indian laws, but never followed by our respected judiciaries in resolving any cases of divorces, alimony or maintainance.
You explain everything very clearly and without wasting a moment .. you are really a super advocate …
Why do men pay any maintenance
When women don't pay any maintenance to men in any circumstances.
Is this gender equality in India.
Justice is due.
Justice for men is biased in India.. our legal system is complacent in delivering justice without considering the agony and mental stress of the men and his family
Process is the punishment
These laws are totally against men in todays time.
The society has changed women can find a job to maintain herself.
Why husband pay allimony shame on judi judiciary.
Jo judge galat judgement dete hai or Jo advocate galat tarika se case lead korte hai , inlogoko v punishment milne chahiye
Agar farzi dhara lagai hai ye prove ho jaye to kya patni ko jail hogi jhuta arop lagane par ?
Patni ko koi saja nahi milegi..sirf salah diya jayga ki aisa false case karke admio ko barbaad na kare
Marriage, once a sacred institution, has been corrupted due to the kind of laws we have.
RIP our judiciary system🤬
In total don't marry and be happy or remain as a Casanova as we can't expect much from law and justice of India
Husband doesn't equal to criminal.
People admit that about 98 pc cases in such matters are fake, motivated and has intention to pressurise and blackmail...but no one is doing anything to give justice to the victimized men.. Shame on the system.. Shame on the judiciary which not only watches from a distance but also becomes part of the system..
Why does only husband pay maintenance?? If one has to listen to this unfair judiciary, then govt should pay 80% and husband pay20%, as it happens with insurance cases.
How do these discourage false allegations on husbands by women?
Don't lawyers themselves suggest the women to appeal such allegations? What's going to discourage such lawyers now?
Husbands are not money making machine, even if they are successful. Stop treating them like banks.
What if.
1. Marriage lasted for only 10 months
2. No children
3. Wife giving threats of suicide to force inlaws to live as per hers and her mother's way..
4. A fake attempt at suicide leading to hospitalization and MLC. ( No case registered ).
Girl is living with her parents since then and
Has filed a DV case against inlaws
Matter in lingering in Distict Court for last 2.5 years.
Please advice on Maintenace and Alimony in such case.
@@bharatkansara9653 no need to maintainance
this will linger for yrs and u hav to pay interim maintenance. Better stop paying maintenance and ask court to decide based on merit.
The main thing the Supreme Court missed to mention in the guidelines is that no maintenance for commiting crime like filing false case or submitting false information by wife. For false case there should be rigorous punishment to wives.
Justice for men...
We are not allowed to say anything everything depends on the advocate Wat they. Judge should see that the Oppsite party comes in the court and gives all the details truthfully and does not cheat the court and the party who has filed the case. Is it true that the one who has filed the case has to be present on all the date and opposite party can sit at home and enjoy till the case is over.
Justice is due
Still justice is due shame on you supreme court
Na shadi karo na court tumhara diwalia nikale😂😂
if lower court is not following supreme court guidelines then throw the judge in the jail . when there are no repercussions then what's the point?
Very nice information sir
Good discussion. 🙏🙏🙏
Just on Dec 23,2024 my friend got divorce after mutual consent.. the marriage fell apart within 1 year of marriage obvi because of some issues from girl's side due to which they agreed for mutual divorce.. but the worst part was it was the judge who was suggesting girl to ask for alimony...
Lower courts main manmani hoti
Under which cercumstances "dawry is illegal" and "alimony is legal" isn't hippocracy what about @right to equality
भारतीय न्यायपालिका व्यवस्था बिलकुल सड़-गल गया है, गुजाराभत्ता पुरुष ही क्यों देगा? शिक्षित महिला नौकरी कर के आत्मनिर्भर क्यों नही बनना चाहती है? उनके पितृसत्ता से संपति क्यों नही मांगते है? पति को ATM मशीन क्यों समझा जा रहा है? पत्नी हमेशा से पति के उपर बोझ क्यों बनना चाहती है, क्या यही इक्विलिटी है?
so overall nothing changed, dont fall for the trap, leave these golddiggers alone like i did. I am happy living alone with my parents.
The lower court does not respect supreme courts....these factors have been defined already a long time ago but lower courts work at their own and do not follow any rules, constitution and supreme court guidelines....!!!
Dowery galat hai aur Alimony bhi.. aurto ko khud kamane do aur jo baccha hai uske kharche milke uthao .. thats a right feminism.. thoko like😊
Bhai sahab thumbnail glt lga dia iska thumbnail hona chaie tha kmjor kanun vyavastha pati ko nahi milega insaaf kisi bhi halat m
If Nirvaya Get Justice Why Not Atul Subash
लग्न करणे गून्हा आहे का जर गून्हा आहे तर दोघानी ही लग्न करूण गून्हा केलाय मग बाईला च का एवढ महत्व दोघाला ही सेम सजा पाहीजे पैसा देण बदं केल की गप्प गूण्यागोविदाने नादल
Or ha meri wakil logo se dono hath jodke 🙏🙏🙏🙏 reqst hai sach ko janne k baad hi ap log case apne hath le, kisi k zindagi ka sawal a jata hai, kyu ki ajkal paisa hi sabkuch nh hota, ghar paribar paiso se badhkar hota hai, ek maa ne ek papa ne apna beta kho dia hain ( atul subhash) .
पति को क्या मिलेगा इस कानून से,सारा तो पत्नी को मिलेगा, ये अंधा कानून है
What if she remarried some one else?? Shouldn't that be taken into consideration??
Ladki ke mata pita ne shadi me jitna kharch kiya ho uska 1/4 har saal allimony ki amount honi chahiye
If Child is there, he or she should be given to father, no maintenance no alimony. Kaam khatam.
APEX COURT Why Not
Taken ATUL case SUOMOTO
Sir cruelty kerney bali bahu ka maintenance sasural ka gold alimony sab baad hona chahiye in ka case b transfer nahi hona chahiye cruelty kerney bali bahu ko jail mi dalo ager ladko cruelty karta hi toh usko jail hota toh bahu ko b jail hona chahiye
One a women present false Allegations accusations without proper Evidence verification
Kahe ka manmani khatam , paisa to dena pad hi raha hai na ,
Maintenance khtm karo family bacho.. sab pysa kaa lalach hy.. Purush aayog turant..
correct....simple strategy all women,advocate,judges r following.... file false cases and extort money
Still maintdnance is favouring wives.Maintenance must be for a limiyed period and should also be decided on duratiom of marriagr and educational qualification of wives
Hindu marriage contract 😂 kardo baat khatam koi shadi ni karega
If a girl comes from lower ground...to upper one ... she can also adjust in lower ground again...
The one who comes from lower to upper immediately....their brain dont work properly 😂 by seeing money
Whether a husband who is not earning or earning less than his wife is also entitled to to claim maintenance and alimony from his wife.Tha law shall be made gender neutral otherwise males will not marry females and will prefer live in which is against interests of the country and sanatan family system .jai hind
Etna sab naatak sirf ladkeyo ky ley.. ladko kaa kya.. patni agar bena kese reason ky gae hy too kya? Uska court ney kuch nahe bola.. sab mela jula ky patni koo pysa doo.. PURUSH AAYOG CHAHEY
Thanks for this video Sir, but ye sabe points sunke mein confuse ho gayaa. Not sure if anything will change. Most of the points are subjective which can differ person to person as well as judges to judges. Ek raw example de sakte ho kya in coming videos to analyse the benefits of these amendments. like take any case where alumni has been declared & as per you what supposed be the revised/new alumni amount after considering these points. So that it will help us to understand whether it's going to add any value. Also anything about the fake cases/claims/charges & cruelty from wife side where there are no punishments ?
Agar koi patni apni pati k upor fake case karti hain (498)A or agar wo patni jhuti sabit nikli to pati ko v haq banta hai k wo alimony mange or esa mange k us patni k hosh ud jaye. Jaise mard suffer karte hai waise aurat o ko v wo dard wo pain feel honi cahiye, after all laws sabke lea ek jaisa hona cahiye.
Basically what Supreme Court has done is that all files were taken out of the rules and they were dusted and retyped using ChatGPT to sound a little milder for the man. It’s all the same said in a slightly different and helpful tone. Why 498 hasn’t been touched at all? First step after 498 is filed is for Police to give an affidavit that they have fully investigated the case and everything is correct and can proceed ahead on it.
marital Laws should be Revised
Sir Kids ki custody kiske hath me hoti he?
Jaha kids ka welfare ho
All are unfair. These laws need to be reviewed. Women are getying away with a lot.
Alimony only child ko milna chahiye,wife ko nehi, alimony husband or father ke income ke upar base korke hona chahiye
When they dont want husband, Shamelessly why they want his property or monthly salary as alimony. Better a marriage agreement is entered before marrying.
For paying alimony, what will be the contribution by lady after divorce ? Will she looks after her husband's parents after his death ? Can the deceased husband's parents claim maintenance from her after divorce. ??
If this trend continues, better for men not to have any property and resign the job. Or become a culprit and get jailed.
अतुल के केस में जौनपुर कोर्ट ने क्यों नहीं पढ़ा इस सुप्रीम कोर्ट की गाइड लाइंस को,नहीं पढ़ा तो जौनपुर जज को पढ़ना चाहिए
The world honorable is now a shameless word... better use shameless which is more meaningful for courts..
No.7 why only women... After the case of 498a most of the men affected by it loose their job. Those does not seems to be balanced 🥺
Wife before divorce:
Itne saalo me mujhe kahi ghumane nahi le gaye
Wife after divorce:
Hum har saal foreign tour pe jaate the
Mujhe same lifestyle maintain karke ke liye har saal foreign tour ke liye 2 lakh rs Milne chahiye
😂😂😂😂
13 crore main kya basic need kai liyeah hain kyaa
Jonpur lower court judge ko suspend karo, life time jail karo, Atul ke opposite advocates ki Sanad rad karo, des vyapi pidit purush sangathan lekar supreme court & parliament ke aage aandolan karo
Marriage ko hi kynu na khtm kiya jaye. Sirf live-in relationship without children ka hi order karna chahiye.
Each case is different.
Urban working women need no alimony.equality is a must.Most women are not not harassing husbands but also in laws.The situation is no longer what it was earlier,do lawd mudt change to safeguard husbands,kids and family.
आजकल औरतों का बहुत अच्छा बिजनेस हो गया है ऐसा दिखाई देता है शादी करो टच मत करने दो उसके बाद मोटी रकम को और उसको छोड़ दो इसमें उसके मां बाप भी शामिल होते हैं
Justice is due 😭
Mujhe help karo plz 5 saal se im travelling frm mumbai to dharwad to attend cases n she didnt even stay for 2 months after marriage
I think an element of contradiction will still prevail where one point is saying about catering to the basic needs of wife and children and their future and the other point is again pointing to the providing equal Social and Economic Status as that of the husband. Instead, I would have expected from the supreme court that it would be a non bailable offence for wife if 498A charges brought by her can't be proved in the court and it would be treated as a cruelty against husband while deciding the alimony. In that way the misuse of this can be stopped to a significant instant. I would rather be happy if the Supreme Court laid down a minimal list of duties of a wife as well in her in-law's house when they had already entitling the duty of the husband to take care and run the of the family as per social and economic statuses thru these points.
Shamles rule of country,