Used INSAS since 2001. Good point--very accurate! Flops: * Frequent jams * Fragile body * Less killing capacity. * Magazines faulty. I preferred heavier SLR 7.62 and AK-47 over INSAS. INSAS LMG is absolutely failure due to:- * Light body reduces sustained fire accuracy. * Magazine under the body exposes the firer and damages to magazine itself. * Old 7.62mm LMG was still preferable.
With the new upgrades and new magazine, most of the flaws of INSAS have been removed. It is a world-class weapon now. Can be India's standard police rifle for state police and para-military like CISF and CRPF.
@@monsterhunt8624 It's suitable only for police and paramilitary forces because of its lack of lethality. The theory of causing injury to the enemy rather than killing, is outdated and no more applicable. 5.56mm doesn't necessarily kill unless it hits vital human parts. With theory gone, all the armies of the world, have returned to 7.62mm.
@@indrajitgupta3280 Nothing wrong happened , what had to happen it happened. i'm just laughing about the way this NEWS channel described it. though i feel proud to our Indian army brothers, huge respect for them ❤️
@@monsterhunt8624 no point he is knowledgeable if he cannot explain clearly to layman and public😂 He should show older version of the rifle snd new version to explain the improvements made. It’s difficult to imagine the things he is saying.😅 I am not as educated as you. 🤣
The problem was with the doctrine and not adapting based on user feedback and making incremental changes, similar to what the British did with the SA-80, from L85A1 to the current L85A3. The initial INSAS with a 20-round magazine was inherited from the SLR 20-round mag philosopy. Over time, the design should have evolved but was stuck in past philosophy. There was already a 30-round mag for the INSAS LMG, which was used in the North East with their INSAS rifle-not standard practice but based on field experience. The first lesson for degradation came from the Kargil War, and feedback should have led to changes, but only small incremental changes were made. A new rifle called the INSAS Excalibur was pitched but rejected by the Army, though it was used by the Assam Rifles, CAPF, and many state forces. The three-round burst and mag capacity don't make sense because if you fire full auto, the whole round is wasted in a few seconds. The Army could have requested more changes in developing the Excalibur and adopted those changes in their new variant of the rifle. That being said, there were a few INSAS variants with an AR-15 style mag well. By the way, there was no M4 carbine in the Vietnam War; it was some Colt's carbine. Yes, the INSAS handgrip is ugly with the saffron color, which was supposed to be safe from heat abrasion, but it was too wide for people under 5'5". Attaching rails and optics doesn't make the gun modern but on par with the current generation. Yes, the previous version had provisions for a specific style of optic mount, but the Picatinny rail solved that. Again, what optic is being mounted is also important as early INSAS optics were very basic. I beg to differ with what Samir said: AK is not just a rifle; it is a proper assault rifle like the AR series, except the mechanism is very different. The INSAS uses the long piston like the AK but better, as it has better dirt cover than the AK due to the selector lever design, which in the AK is quite susceptible to dirt. The INSAS still has its place; it is not reborn, it is just being updated to the level of standard that should have been achieved many years ago. Ps: No INSAS in Myanmar except some rebels using it.
The recoil of INSAS is about half in respect of AK- 47. Moreover , INSAS LMG has magazine capacity of 30 rds. Of ammunition and this can easily 10:50 10:50 10:50 be fitted in INSAS Rifle for firing .
The problem with Insas is that these upgrades should have been made much earlier than just now . May be like 20 years ago or just after Kargil . The weapon design bureau set up and weapon research funds should have been allocated like 5-10 years after Kargil which could have given us an even Better INSAS by now . Our govt. As always is just busy in buying time for freebies donation from Armed force upgradation. Just compare how much we are dependent for Riffles on foreign nations still today that we are waiting for clearance of AK -203 after 77 years of independence.
AMCA is no fully 5th Gen. Considering itll have exposed payloads. It will be 4.8 gen tops. Also China would have moved to a 6th Gen groundworks and even a prototype by the time AMCA takes first flight. Dont let your nationalism blind your logic. We are way behind China.
25 years for the defence ministry to be sidelined in its procurement policy by circumstances. Great to know that the feedback loop has been streamlined and a better designer is in place for the mainstay of the infantry which cannot be checkmated by intrigue in the defence ministry where kickbacks were rampant
पाकिस्तान अपना बनाता है । भारत से अच्छा बनाया । कभी यूट्यूब देखना , पाविस्तानी साले पिस्टल भी सभी कॉपी बना लेते है आसानी से । देसी इक्विपमेंट्स से । भारत में कुर्सियां तोड़ने का रिवाज है , काम कम
Insas is made on the bizarre principle of injuring an enemy rather than killing him so many more of his friends will remove from the battlefields in order to save him many many army men called this rifle substandard weapon. And for that matter Ak has no comparison still now
This was a concept that did not emerge from a vacuum, and was not an Indian Army line of thought. It originated in the US and in NATO. There was a genuine discussion over the relative merits of 7.62mm vs the 5.56 mm, and it cannot be dismissed with an airy remark. There is nothing inherent in the design of the Kalashnikov that demands a bullet of a specific calibre. Please correct this statement if there is any technical issue to be raised.
He misses one key flaw of the INSAS i.e. the rifle keeps firing fully auto when put in 3 round burst when soldiers operate the rifle in high altitudes with extreme cold weather conditions. If this problem is not fix then it cannot be a true reborn in my opinion. If then it's great work by the research team.
It’s for the soldiers to decide …having used an SLR , INSAS n AKs extensively in combat …there are many issues like battle hardiness , weight , recoil , accuracy n carriage …fixing of grenade launchers etc ( if the provision exists ) , bipod n bayonet fixing , flash hider …dismantling n reinstalling etc of the new INSAS that needs to be tested …but a 3 rnd burst sounds good on the face of it ..
@@sanjeevbhattacharjee1936 In 3-round burst, 1 round goes waste unless fired at a very close range. The theory of high-volume and sustained fire with 3-rd bursts doesn't fit well with only 20-rd magazines, and also the inaccuracy caused. If this 3-rd burst can be applied to LMGs and MMGs, they would be more useful and ammunition saver.
@@skengene lol no one asks details, but when you redesign a weapon, you work on its metallurgy, muzzle velocity, redesigning the bullet for higher impact or travel.... forget other things I dont think DRDO as any expertise in metallurgy, classified lol
WRT the magazine's, the LMG and rifle were supposed to have interchangeable magazine's. The issue was with both the magazine's. Second, the LMG magazine was a 30 round mag.
INSAS not situble for insergecy operations.stukimg problem and magazines are plastic.low ammuation capacity(20 Nos)as compared to AK series Riffles (30 nos)
Mr Samir is calling the Ak as a carbine/submachine gun ,world over it is called an assault rifle & the M4 is called carbine by US troops either he is confused or we all have been taken for one big ride
Why can't we design a complete New Rifle, we are still s with those Old and Heavy Insas . Europe, US and china are working on a Tracking point Rifles much lighter, And Accurate.
plz dont try to reborn first improve its looks this is worst looking rifle and mechanism is no secret. AK203 is nice gun if wanna go indigenous SSS made rifles are performing good and even exporting. should give chance to our private firms
Kyuki tab kisi ne socha bhi nhi naa hi dhyan diya Upgrade krne kaa.. Ab Atleast Centre me jo government hai Defence me to ache se dhyan de rhi hai. Bas Military Modernisation kaash hmari jaldi hota to desh ka self confidence aur boost hota..
Prime example of how pathetically Indian Govt Babus treat Indian Army. The Army cannot even get a decent rifle for use by soldiers. Here is a guy who has potentially never used a weapon in war, trying to label Insas as formidable. What a joke.
You would do well to remember the late exCDS's comments on army QRs. Remember the gun that they wanted that could fire 2 different calibers. Army procurement is for foreign trips, not for good guns.
As usual amazing(ly poor) job by Indian media production shop - unable to find a single proper image of the new rifle and illustrating the changes and improvements diagrammatically. A picture is worth a 1000 words as they say … Keep up the pathetic show guys! You did a great job letting down the anchor and host of this show. The net result is a time-wasting affair viewing this video. Westerners are so productive in their output in contrast… even as a solo one-man operation! Just checkout the 1000s of videos out there! It’s a real shame that your team could not manage minimum statndards of production…
We can make Satellite for Mars and still we have such bad INSAS rifle . Why can we design our own Next Generation Rifle. INSAS is complete a piece of Scraf . There is no comparison of it with AK which is far older design .
Making faulty rifle is wastage of taxpayers money. But Indian people are not aware of these things. Government agency and leadership can do anything they want to do 😅
Please don't it was junk when it came, it was junk while it was there, it's still junk. 30 round mag is not an upgrade you could always do that with an insas LMG mag. Picatinny rail is not an upgrade. The mag was not such a problem it was the jams and not to forget that oil that this rifle spurts right into your eyes with the first shot. Then we brought sig saure the rifle which failed. This rifle was a failure even when it was launched in the north american market but we still brought it and now "Insas reborn". The era of three round bursts is gone, left in the 80's don't cradle it. Get a good look at the rifle look at that muzzle climb. LET IT GO, BUY SOMETHING GOOD.
Technology is developed through multiple trials. Don't forget , computers were as big as a room, if we wud let go of it by listening to people like you, we wudnt be here today.
@@skengene our arm chair military expert is here again acting all intelligent 😂. Insas is a failed system and the makers of Insas never even tried to make it into a better version. Stop defending them. Even some of the private sectors are designing better rifles than this govt psu .
@@skengene lol 😂 what a misplaced analogy. Unlike computers, we already have multiple small arms platforms which are highly reliable and effective. But no but with your logic we should buy room computers while laptops are not only available but affordable and everyone else has it.
India might be hope for you yet , you have learned to make your own rifles and Small arms . One more thing do not buy any European firearms they will work for a certain amount of time and they'll go down on you . U.S. Secret Service SAC Teddy Houston 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Reservation is not responsible but reverse reservation is responsible .Who is occupying scientists and research and development position?.When you utter your narrative you have to factually correct?.Also minuscule funding in research and development and fragile higher educational infrastructure are responsible.Names are greater but actually itself are hollows.
Its just a cosmatic kit. Internally they did nothing. Same rifle and long barrels. Haven't reduce barrel length still 18 inch. They should make it 14 inch barrel with new compensater. And im sure they will charge 50k plus to just upgrade butt dust cover handguard and new magazine.
Reasons: 1) Arms act 1878 started the destruction of india's gun culture. 2) It further got destroyed as even the newly independent indian government continued with more or less the same colonial law in the version of Arms act 1959. These acts essentially destroyed any gun culture which could've sustained a competitive gun makers ecosystem. Look up any well known gun making country or company, most of them have a historical civilian gun culture. Also legendary guns were made by some talented and passionate individual gun designers like John browning, mikhail Kalashnikov, Eugene stoner, Paul mauser, ferdinand mannlicher, Daiudonne saive, samuel colt etc. India had neither 3) Further the new government monopolized Firearms manufacturing with an inherently inefficient, lazy and incompetent organization called OFB. So any small cottage gun industry was there they killed it( gunsmiths of munger were famous and even the British used them to come up with revolutionary ideas like dum dum bullets which are essentially hollow points) and we ended up at the mercy of the shitty ordinance factories. You will be surprised to know that a country like india doesn't have any gunsmithing courses or institutions teaching this trade. With all of this f**ked up situation how can you expect a decent firearm?.
Used INSAS since 2001. Good point--very accurate!
Flops:
* Frequent jams
* Fragile body
* Less killing capacity.
* Magazines faulty.
I preferred heavier SLR 7.62 and AK-47 over INSAS.
INSAS LMG is absolutely failure due to:-
* Light body reduces sustained fire accuracy.
* Magazine under the body exposes the firer and damages to magazine itself.
* Old 7.62mm LMG was still preferable.
Its almost perfect rifle.
Its manufacturing defects.
Typical OFB
With the new upgrades and new magazine, most of the flaws of INSAS have been removed. It is a world-class weapon now. Can be India's standard police rifle for state police and para-military like CISF and CRPF.
@@monsterhunt8624 It's suitable only for police and paramilitary forces because of its lack of lethality. The theory of causing injury to the enemy rather than killing, is outdated and no more applicable.
5.56mm doesn't necessarily kill unless it hits vital human parts. With theory gone, all the armies of the world, have returned to 7.62mm.
U shud have shown viewers pics of the upgraded INSAS..
6:50
Yes. I was hoping a photo of the upgraded gun would pop up when they started talking about the upgrades.
The editor is at fault here.
they are talking about ak 203
@@samarjeetdas6254 Anything wrong with that? That is the Kalashnikov variant under production for the Indian Army.
@@indrajitgupta3280 Nothing wrong happened , what had to happen it happened. i'm just laughing about the way this NEWS channel described it. though i feel proud to our Indian army brothers, huge respect for them ❤️
Samir dhawan the best person i worked under him. Very positive guy 🎉
SSS Defence and other private companies have made really good Rifles we should Consider those Made in india Guns. And promote Make in India .
Believe me there is a huge arms commission lobby in the MoD. Nobody is going to touch them.
Omg, finally some news anchors who really know what a defence equipment is...😮
CEO of the company upgrading the insas rifles should be hands on man.
He should explain with the real upgraded rifle instead of empty talk
The CEO is so knowledgeable. The only thing empty is your head
@@monsterhunt8624 no point he is knowledgeable if he cannot explain clearly to layman and public😂
He should show older version of the rifle snd new version to explain the improvements made.
It’s difficult to imagine the things he is saying.😅
I am not as educated as you. 🤣
The problem was with the doctrine and not adapting based on user feedback and making incremental changes, similar to what the British did with the SA-80, from L85A1 to the current L85A3. The initial INSAS with a 20-round magazine was inherited from the SLR 20-round mag philosopy. Over time, the design should have evolved but was stuck in past philosophy. There was already a 30-round mag for the INSAS LMG, which was used in the North East with their INSAS rifle-not standard practice but based on field experience.
The first lesson for degradation came from the Kargil War, and feedback should have led to changes, but only small incremental changes were made. A new rifle called the INSAS Excalibur was pitched but rejected by the Army, though it was used by the Assam Rifles, CAPF, and many state forces. The three-round burst and mag capacity don't make sense because if you fire full auto, the whole round is wasted in a few seconds. The Army could have requested more changes in developing the Excalibur and adopted those changes in their new variant of the rifle.
That being said, there were a few INSAS variants with an AR-15 style mag well. By the way, there was no M4 carbine in the Vietnam War; it was some Colt's carbine. Yes, the INSAS handgrip is ugly with the saffron color, which was supposed to be safe from heat abrasion, but it was too wide for people under 5'5". Attaching rails and optics doesn't make the gun modern but on par with the current generation. Yes, the previous version had provisions for a specific style of optic mount, but the Picatinny rail solved that. Again, what optic is being mounted is also important as early INSAS optics were very basic.
I beg to differ with what Samir said: AK is not just a rifle; it is a proper assault rifle like the AR series, except the mechanism is very different. The INSAS uses the long piston like the AK but better, as it has better dirt cover than the AK due to the selector lever design, which in the AK is quite susceptible to dirt. The INSAS still has its place; it is not reborn, it is just being updated to the level of standard that should have been achieved many years ago.
Ps: No INSAS in Myanmar except some rebels using it.
I think the LMG variant shouldn't have been made. We could have gone with the American SAW, because a 30 round box for a LMG doesn't make sense
The recoil of INSAS is about half in respect of AK- 47. Moreover , INSAS LMG has magazine capacity of 30 rds. Of ammunition and this can easily 10:50 10:50 10:50 be fitted in INSAS Rifle for firing .
The problem with Insas is that these upgrades should have been made much earlier than just now .
May be like 20 years ago or just after Kargil .
The weapon design bureau set up and weapon research funds should have been allocated like 5-10 years after Kargil which could have given us an even Better INSAS by now .
Our govt. As always is just busy in buying time for freebies donation from Armed force upgradation.
Just compare how much we are dependent for Riffles on foreign nations still today that we are waiting for clearance of
AK -203 after 77 years of independence.
Indian cant even make a gun but china is perfecting 5th gen fighter and making 6th gen fighter like a champ
AMCA is laughing at the corner.
India has invested R&D in conventional arms very recently... whereas China is looked down as copier of western technology via espionage
AMCA is no fully 5th Gen. Considering itll have exposed payloads. It will be 4.8 gen tops. Also China would have moved to a 6th Gen groundworks and even a prototype by the time AMCA takes first flight. Dont let your nationalism blind your logic. We are way behind China.
Good public private partnership. Thanks for bringing good news. Hopefully INSAS is exported too.
@@lightning_8340 INSAS had been exported to few countries.
INSAS reborn with new defects .😂😂😂😂
25 years for the defence ministry to be sidelined in its procurement policy by circumstances. Great to know that the feedback loop has been streamlined and a better designer is in place for the mainstay of the infantry which cannot be checkmated by intrigue in the defence ministry where kickbacks were rampant
From 6.50 minutes I think it is the video od of the upgraded INSAS
6:50 this is the upgraded version. They have basically changed it with a kit.
that is exactly what the russians have done with AK derivative weapons and the americans with the M4 derivative weapons.
Every product goes through this phase, design - test - improve but for Indian people, they want a perfect product in the first round of development.
Exactly.
पाकिस्तान अपना बनाता है । भारत से अच्छा बनाया । कभी यूट्यूब देखना , पाविस्तानी साले पिस्टल भी सभी कॉपी बना लेते है आसानी से । देसी इक्विपमेंट्स से । भारत में कुर्सियां तोड़ने का रिवाज है , काम कम
Already Celebrated 32nd Birthday. Hearing This Bullshit News past 20 years.
Insas with detachable but and a good holographic sight can be a game changer mainly insas is made for defensive approach not offensive one
What about barrel redesign and jamming of weapons due to overheating
What about jamming and oil leakage
I searched INSAS in google and after some time when i opened youtube , this was the top video☠️☠️
Sounds like paid promo
Insas is made on the bizarre principle of injuring an enemy rather than killing him so many more of his friends will remove from the battlefields in order to save him many many army men called this rifle substandard weapon. And for that matter Ak has no comparison still now
This was a concept that did not emerge from a vacuum, and was not an Indian Army line of thought. It originated in the US and in NATO. There was a genuine discussion over the relative merits of 7.62mm vs the 5.56 mm, and it cannot be dismissed with an airy remark.
There is nothing inherent in the design of the Kalashnikov that demands a bullet of a specific calibre. Please correct this statement if there is any technical issue to be raised.
He misses one key flaw of the INSAS i.e. the rifle keeps firing fully auto when put in 3 round burst when soldiers operate the rifle in high altitudes with extreme cold weather conditions. If this problem is not fix then it cannot be a true reborn in my opinion. If then it's great work by the research team.
Quality content. Seedi baat , no bakwaas. Couldn't resist to subscribe 😊
One video they showed and it is still stopping in between with so called new magzine
This video is all about praising a failed project and celebrating mediocrity at its best. Army shouldn't accept such bs and should go for the best.
The major drop out of INSAS is the firing pin problem that constantly faced during the action
❤❤❤❤ awesome video .. loved it
Upgraded pictures?
It’s for the soldiers to decide …having used an SLR , INSAS n AKs extensively in combat …there are many issues like battle hardiness , weight , recoil , accuracy n carriage …fixing of grenade launchers etc ( if the provision exists ) , bipod n bayonet fixing , flash hider …dismantling n reinstalling etc of the new INSAS that needs to be tested …but a 3 rnd burst sounds good on the face of it ..
@@sanjeevbhattacharjee1936 In 3-round burst, 1 round goes waste unless fired at a very close range. The theory of high-volume and sustained fire with 3-rd bursts doesn't fit well with only 20-rd magazines, and also the inaccuracy caused.
If this 3-rd burst can be applied to LMGs and MMGs, they would be more useful and ammunition saver.
7:45 LOL🤣 no stoppages!........man this rifle was junk from the beginning .
LMAO
It can be ammo also.
It's working amazing now u loser
The only junk is your mindset. Read more clown. Product development isn't a fairytale anywhere.
There are multiple AK and AR which jam occasionally too. It depends on the meantime between jams.
Good to see, Finally someone anchoring the show, who has defense knowledge. I follow his youtube channel.
What about matterrulgy it still same why army is looking for old gun they have guns from SSS defence
Problem is not with Design ..but prkbably with finishing quality...
Indigenous is the only way forward
So all they did is redesign the magzine, nothing to do with improvement of metallurgy, accuracy and distance,lol
Metallury have been improved since 1b and excalibur variants
@@KKPR533 good to know but it needs to look modern not just patched railings on 70's rifle.
@@Aditya0227 agreed
Army is not going to tell u the metallurgy improvements dude ,they are classified 😂
@@skengene lol no one asks details, but when you redesign a weapon, you work on its metallurgy, muzzle velocity, redesigning the bullet for higher impact or travel.... forget other things I dont think DRDO as any expertise in metallurgy, classified lol
INSAS has proven formidable for the person holding it.
So many new indian rifles are shown in defence expo,where are those rifles,where is Ugram rifles.
I saw modified lNSAS and it remind me like a childhood toys😂....
5.56mm round were intro with the concept, which is no longer valid.
Always hated the handle, i guess had it been a good rifle in kargil war that handle would have been iconic but it ended up being a sore thumb
Please show the pictures of modified insas.
I never thought I'd see this day when the INSAS gets an upgrade.
Commendable initiative. 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Would it be right to say that a private company did in about 3yrs what the drdo/ofb could not- for 30 years?
Absolutely right 💯
WRT the magazine's, the LMG and rifle were supposed to have interchangeable magazine's. The issue was with both the magazine's.
Second, the LMG magazine was a 30 round mag.
What is weight increase after the upgrade!
SLRs made in India were always the best rifles.
LOL...there's a reason the Indian army have been looking for a new assault rifle except INSAS😂
Wee want to see same upgrade in insas exclabiur amd insas 1c
Jamming issue is not fixed... ?
INSAS not situble for insergecy operations.stukimg problem and magazines are plastic.low ammuation capacity(20 Nos)as compared to AK series Riffles (30 nos)
Just ask soldiers who used it they will tell the correct reviews of that rifle.
I know one and he said he will always choose an AK over an Insan rifle.
And a heavy Bren over Insas Lmg.
He said even SLR was better than Insas.
@@sukhpreetdeol2781 Agree 👍
I am 5'4" it was even difficult for me to aim.
Mr Samir is calling the Ak as a carbine/submachine gun ,world over it is called an assault rifle & the M4 is called carbine by US troops either he is confused or we all have been taken for one big ride
Insas 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Rappers in US who use autotune have better guns than INSAS 😂
Some people say that the enemy does not die from INSAS while the same bullet hits M4 also, then how do the enemies die 😂
@@rakeshsingh6421 In Hollywood only.
@@upadhyayrathiraj1518 The USA army uses these bullets everywhere in the Iraq war in Afghanistan
INSAS look OUR'S OWN...
Why can't we design a complete New Rifle, we are still s with those Old and Heavy Insas . Europe, US and china are working on a Tracking point Rifles much lighter, And Accurate.
इंसास और एक 47 का मुकाबला क्या है
So many pupg and counter strike players are commenting 😅
It's shocking,
But wait where is the rifle
Mofo is all upto selling cheap plastic makeshift improvements at the 4x cost of weapon itself. 😢
AK is not a rifle?!😂
Insas is worst copy of GAlil that has also been a flop gun ever wonder India couldn't be able to make its own rifle yet
plz dont try to reborn first improve its looks this is worst looking rifle and mechanism is no secret. AK203 is nice gun if wanna go indigenous SSS made rifles are performing good and even exporting.
should give chance to our private firms
It takes 20 years to redesign 😂😂😂😂
Kyuki tab kisi ne socha bhi nhi naa hi dhyan diya Upgrade krne kaa.. Ab Atleast Centre me jo government hai Defence me to ache se dhyan de rhi hai. Bas Military Modernisation kaash hmari jaldi hota to desh ka self confidence aur boost hota..
Prime example of how pathetically Indian Govt Babus treat Indian Army. The Army cannot even get a decent rifle for use by soldiers. Here is a guy who has potentially never used a weapon in war, trying to label Insas as formidable. What a joke.
Perfect assessment
You would do well to remember the late exCDS's comments on army QRs. Remember the gun that they wanted that could fire 2 different calibers. Army procurement is for foreign trips, not for good guns.
Jamming issue??
The Government PSUs are such a craps
looks cool
As usual amazing(ly poor) job by Indian media production shop - unable to find a single proper image of the new rifle and illustrating the changes and improvements diagrammatically. A picture is worth a 1000 words as they say … Keep up the pathetic show guys! You did a great job letting down the anchor and host of this show. The net result is a time-wasting affair viewing this video. Westerners are so productive in their output in contrast… even as a solo one-man operation! Just checkout the 1000s of videos out there! It’s a real shame that your team could not manage minimum statndards of production…
Recoil problem
Actually, this INSAS Rifle is not made for indian army.
common man even its not special weapon, no upgrade pics available
@2:53, You enhanced the capacity? The INSAS was compatible with 20 round and 30 round magazines from the beginning.
Did he called Ak as submachinengun 🤣🤣
We can make Satellite for Mars and still we have such bad INSAS rifle . Why can we design our own Next Generation Rifle. INSAS is complete a piece of Scraf . There is no comparison of it with AK which is far older design .
Indian Army should be supplied with Isreali rifles which they are using in Israeli Hamas war .
Everyone must understand one thing, you cannot polish a turd!
This weapon must have win the world ugliest weapons ever made by mankind
Look matters! It still looks ugly in renovated avtar too...
Making faulty rifle is wastage of taxpayers money. But Indian people are not aware of these things. Government agency and leadership can do anything they want to do 😅
You're just selling old liquor in new labelled bottle
Please don't it was junk when it came, it was junk while it was there, it's still junk. 30 round mag is not an upgrade you could always do that with an insas LMG mag. Picatinny rail is not an upgrade. The mag was not such a problem it was the jams and not to forget that oil that this rifle spurts right into your eyes with the first shot. Then we brought sig saure the rifle which failed. This rifle was a failure even when it was launched in the north american market but we still brought it and now "Insas reborn". The era of three round bursts is gone, left in the 80's don't cradle it. Get a good look at the rifle look at that muzzle climb. LET IT GO, BUY SOMETHING GOOD.
Technology is developed through multiple trials. Don't forget , computers were as big as a room, if we wud let go of it by listening to people like you, we wudnt be here today.
@@skengene our arm chair military expert is here again acting all intelligent 😂. Insas is a failed system and the makers of Insas never even tried to make it into a better version. Stop defending them. Even some of the private sectors are designing better rifles than this govt psu .
It's matured now
@@skengene lol 😂 what a misplaced analogy. Unlike computers, we already have multiple small arms platforms which are highly reliable and effective. But no but with your logic we should buy room computers while laptops are not only available but affordable and everyone else has it.
Turns out the oil spurting issue wasn't due to the rifle but some soldiers over oiling the gun. It needs just 5ml to clean it.
See the recoil man😮. Not a gun expert, but i still want to say that, the recoil is more than american counterparts
Most handlers r not from army,they r just employees,so they can't handle like para SF or RR
No country will buy insas rifle speaking of export 😂😂😂😂
We can not make even a Gun.
Too much talking.... INSAS is a useless riffle.... It jammed during critical times... It was playing with lives of brave soldiers....
Naaah not enough. Indian Army will still dump it like a toxic ex girlfriend.
India might be hope for you yet , you have learned to make your own rifles and Small arms . One more thing do not buy any European firearms they will work for a certain amount of time and they'll go down on you .
U.S. Secret Service SAC Teddy Houston 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Magazine bhi design nhi hota hai, gift of quota system n reservation mindset
Reservation is not responsible but reverse reservation is responsible .Who is occupying scientists and research and development position?.When you utter your narrative you have to factually correct?.Also minuscule funding in research and development and fragile higher educational infrastructure are responsible.Names are greater but actually itself are hollows.
Its just a cosmatic kit. Internally they did nothing. Same rifle and long barrels. Haven't reduce barrel length still 18 inch. They should make it 14 inch barrel with new compensater. And im sure they will charge 50k plus to just upgrade butt dust cover handguard and new magazine.
How did india manage the chandrayan moon landing when it cannot even make a decent gun?
Reasons:
1) Arms act 1878 started the destruction of india's gun culture.
2) It further got destroyed as even the newly independent indian government continued with more or less the same colonial law in the version of Arms act 1959.
These acts essentially destroyed any gun culture which could've sustained a competitive gun makers ecosystem.
Look up any well known gun making country or company, most of them have a historical civilian gun culture. Also legendary guns were made by some talented and passionate individual gun designers like John browning, mikhail Kalashnikov, Eugene stoner, Paul mauser, ferdinand mannlicher, Daiudonne saive, samuel colt etc. India had neither
3) Further the new government monopolized Firearms manufacturing with an inherently inefficient, lazy and incompetent organization called OFB. So any small cottage gun industry was there they killed it( gunsmiths of munger were famous and even the British used them to come up with revolutionary ideas like dum dum bullets which are essentially hollow points) and we ended up at the mercy of the shitty ordinance factories.
You will be surprised to know that a country like india doesn't have any gunsmithing courses or institutions teaching this trade.
With all of this f**ked up situation how can you expect a decent firearm?.
One of the worst rifles in Military History.
INSAS is not good for opreation useless gun
True rifle LMAO
Worst rifle in the history of Gun
Trash of a gun .
Junk rifle.Malfunction and jamming all the time.Insas catastrophe rifle
In the first place with so many defects, if I may say so, how it was induced and in service so long.