Before attempting to comment I was advised by the guidelines for this channel to be respectful and civil as guideline rules, which now upon thinking reinforces the points of my comment, yet remain (odd) as guideline rules. I will do my best. (We need to keep it for the people who ((deserve)) these things). Is one of the points I like to bring an attention to in the form of the sentence mentioned. How would anyone (keep it) in the first place, and once that is overcome, how would the (deserve these things) part be applied in relation to the (keep it) part. (I would say, that voting is an assembly even in modern periods, and if anyone cannot get to that assembly for a reason or combinations off, then the answer should be a bit easier, if anyone is allowed, permitted or impeded to vote). In order to understand better, anyone only needs to know how a person travels from a restrictive place such as a prison to a hospital for example , more precisely the limit put on what length are anyone's steps allowed to be. That precise action should make it obvious, that the same person would, and should find it impossible to get to an assembly, such as voting. The other point, is a possible answer (that baroness Hale kindly and respectfully emphasised (caution) through her answer, when anyone is refering so boldly about such subject), to the difference in susceptibility (regarding corruption) between the British judicial system and other European judicial systems. I would not be so diplomatic, as I am not in a position to be, but instead the same emphasis in (caution) I would word it in a different manner, with the same result possibly. And it is this..... Which European factors are more susceptible to corruption that differ from the British ones, the Roman factor, the Frank factor, the Norman factor, the Viking factor, or the Saxon factor, I almost forgot the Celtic factor?!?!... Unless.......! As I suspect the baroness Hale pointed to the conventional (bribe) side of corruption, and the unconventional side of corruption, (the true ever elusive corruption, very hard to pin down as such), when constructing such a bold question.
She's my idol. I have so much respect for this woman. Lady Hale for life (WWLHD)
Great thanks so very much
I Love All My Children and Johnny And Wish Your Opininated view on a Union come undone here in Ontario , Canada
I prayer to help the 17,000 children in family courts system in uk.
Thanks Baroness Hale and happy retirement. Love from Rachael and Michael. Michael get's bullied by Jackson in School.
Before attempting to comment I was advised by the guidelines for this channel to be respectful and civil as guideline rules, which now upon thinking reinforces the points of my comment, yet remain (odd) as guideline rules. I will do my best.
(We need to keep it for the people who ((deserve)) these things). Is one of the points I like to bring an attention to in the form of the sentence mentioned. How would anyone (keep it) in the first place, and once that is overcome, how would the (deserve these things) part be applied in relation to the (keep it) part.
(I would say, that voting is an assembly even in modern periods, and if anyone cannot get to that assembly for a reason or combinations off, then the answer should be a bit easier, if anyone is allowed, permitted or impeded to vote).
In order to understand better, anyone only needs to know how a person travels from a restrictive place such as a prison to a hospital for example , more precisely the limit put on what length are anyone's steps allowed to be. That precise action should make it obvious, that the same person would, and should find it impossible to get to an assembly, such as voting.
The other point, is a possible answer (that baroness Hale kindly and respectfully emphasised (caution) through her answer, when anyone is refering so boldly about such subject), to the difference in susceptibility (regarding corruption) between the British judicial system and other European judicial systems.
I would not be so diplomatic, as I am not in a position to be, but instead the same emphasis in (caution) I would word it in a different manner, with the same result possibly.
And it is this.....
Which European factors are more susceptible to corruption that differ from the British ones, the Roman factor, the Frank factor, the Norman factor, the Viking factor, or the Saxon factor, I almost forgot the Celtic factor?!?!...
Unless.......! As I suspect the baroness Hale pointed to the conventional (bribe) side of corruption, and the unconventional side of corruption, (the true ever elusive corruption, very hard to pin down as such), when constructing such a bold question.
I and Michael would like to meet you please x
Traitor