A three minute primer on meta-analysis

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 янв 2025
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 23

  • @thesoultheory3822
    @thesoultheory3822 5 лет назад +48

    Thank you for explaining meta-analysis better in 3 minutes than my research professor ever did in three or so hours.

  • @LiPS-lipu
    @LiPS-lipu 9 месяцев назад

    the metaphor and animation of a balance is fantastic!!! very easy to understand

  • @amaniwynter9845
    @amaniwynter9845 4 года назад +6

    Thank you for this clear, informative, and quick video

  • @amuslimah7710
    @amuslimah7710 4 года назад +2

    this was brilliant in explaining the subject. the visuals were stellar !

  • @Billy97ify
    @Billy97ify 3 года назад +1

    The best part was using the words "best guess". That sums up the whole subject.

  • @lokjee
    @lokjee 2 года назад +1

    the presentation really made an impact - helped me understand the concept

  • @MaxKamrani
    @MaxKamrani 2 года назад +1

    great short and clear compared to the 1h long others vids... thanks!

  • @mahiralmuhammed4734
    @mahiralmuhammed4734 4 года назад +2

    many thanks for the clear explaining

  • @samlloyd2316
    @samlloyd2316 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for that - excellent video!

  • @hollygoodson6025
    @hollygoodson6025 4 года назад +1

    Great video!

  • @imabrown3678
    @imabrown3678 4 года назад

    So 1. This is only to establish the efficiency of a medical treatment and 2. Where can I get the specifics ?

  • @sambasivaraop9403
    @sambasivaraop9403 4 года назад +3

    Thanks for explaining in nutshell

  • @marcho234sias7
    @marcho234sias7 3 года назад +2

    You are sooooo clear and concise ty bro!

  • @allanochoa4826
    @allanochoa4826 4 года назад +1

    whats the difference between this and a systematic review?

    • @jmb56
      @jmb56 4 года назад

      Meta analysis is the quantitative component of a systematic review. Sometimes a systematic review does not yield a sufficient number of studies to enable a meta-analysis to be conducted. Even if there are enough studies, the reviewer may not want to quantitatively combine the study results because e.g. there are too many intrinsic differences between them

  • @angelabae5710
    @angelabae5710 2 года назад

    Amazing!!! Thank you!!!

  • @David66Peterson
    @David66Peterson 5 лет назад +1

    Thank you!!

  • @benjaminjones3043
    @benjaminjones3043 5 лет назад

    Can you do want on diagnostic test accuracy meta analysis
    Another on prognostic meta analysis (both with explain of the Cochrane protocols)
    And expand some of the more complex stats eg hierarchical summary ROC

    • @jmb56
      @jmb56 5 лет назад

      Good idea! Pester Hayley Jones at Bristol for that!

  • @minjeonghan2196
    @minjeonghan2196 6 лет назад +2

    Brilliant!

    • @jmb56
      @jmb56 5 лет назад

      Thanks Min Jeong!

  • @LPAXXX
    @LPAXXX 3 года назад +1

    excellent thank you