China's MASSIVE Production of DF-26 Aircraft Carrier Killers To Counter US Navy

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 59

  • @Trueye-sl2mr
    @Trueye-sl2mr 4 дня назад +43

    China is being transparent informing USA not to be stupid in starting any war.

    • @DavidLe-xw2qf
      @DavidLe-xw2qf 4 дня назад

      China is stupider by threatening Taiwan when China knows that it is no match to the USA and her allies

    • @daniely500
      @daniely500 4 дня назад +1

      Exactly

    • @chipschannel9494
      @chipschannel9494 3 дня назад

      Transparent, what a bunch of BULL , ccp is all bluff , they no nothing of naval warfare. Their carrier needs MUCH work .stop with the “hOTAIR”

    • @josephhornbostel9506
      @josephhornbostel9506 3 дня назад

      Lmao. Why would any military power share a weapons system capable of defeating their enemies' weapons of strength! They would only do that as a bluff. When an enemy knows you have undefeatable weapons. They develop weapons to counteract those weapons. A smart military hides their strengths and shows weaknesses. So yea the US is not worried and hoping china is stupid enough to FAFO. Good luck. I realize you are just trying to increase your social credit score. But do not FAFO with the US's military.

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

  • @林木老寄卖
    @林木老寄卖 4 дня назад +10

    你必须要有足够强大的军事能力 才配拥有和平

  • @cosmic24680
    @cosmic24680 4 дня назад +14

    China should have production of a few thousands of these missiles for effective deterrent in view of advance US anti missiles system.

    • @PhiloSurfer
      @PhiloSurfer 4 дня назад +3

      Already done that.

    • @freeworld88888
      @freeworld88888 4 дня назад +2

      DF26 series are more deady. china has a big stocks of missiles, the rocket forces got the most of the bugdets our of the 285b dollars, they got 70b, the troops are all university qualifications and super talents.

    • @johnhulk3347
      @johnhulk3347 4 дня назад

      Similarly to the iron dome of apartheid Israel,, US anti missile systems will be useless

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      @@freeworld88888 Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 21 час назад +1

      the battlefield test of the empire's anti-missile system was less than acceptable in Ukraine.

  • @wingmay8571
    @wingmay8571 4 дня назад +6

    More than that, China has DF-27, DF-17 too. DF-17 is a stealth, hypersonic missile. DF-27 has longer range. They are too big to be fit in the war ships. Chinese made YJ-21 missiles. YJ-21 is smaller and able to fit in 055 and 052D destroyers.

    • @chipschannel9494
      @chipschannel9494 3 дня назад

      Nobody will buy them .

    • @月隐谷
      @月隐谷 3 дня назад +1

      ​@@chipschannel9494Don't be so childish, okay? Just like the F22 in the United States. Why doesn't anyone buy it?

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 3 дня назад +2

      @@chipschannel9494 They aren't for sale. No one is buying your BS either.

    • @chipschannel9494
      @chipschannel9494 3 дня назад

      @ f-15s,f-16s, Australian nuclear power subs , that ain’t bs , that’s why you keep copying an trying to steal. Your carrier can’t even do flight deck operations, get out of your fantasy.

    • @chipschannel9494
      @chipschannel9494 2 дня назад

      @ it works

  • @Bk6346
    @Bk6346 4 дня назад +5

    Guam Express DF-26 missile

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

  • @DanBurgaud
    @DanBurgaud 4 дня назад +10

    "If you want Peace, prepare for War."

  • @wingmay8571
    @wingmay8571 День назад

    China has the newest DF-27, double the range, 8000km. It doesn't matter because CIA can't read Chinese 😂

  • @frankojudoka
    @frankojudoka 4 дня назад +2

    A Missile Great Wall.

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

  • @jeffreystliow
    @jeffreystliow 4 дня назад +5

    More, more, mo, mo, mo,..

  • @danis8162
    @danis8162 3 дня назад +2

    Yes , the Napoleon's sleeping Giant has really already awoken , no doubt about it .

  • @freeworld88888
    @freeworld88888 4 дня назад +2

    This year china tested on a moving ships in the south china. The missiles was lunched from shaanxi province in the northern china, it was a successful killed.

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 21 час назад

      aircraft carrier is simply a floating platform for fighter jets. it will stay out of missile's way and launch its fighter planes there.

  • @vankhoanglam2164
    @vankhoanglam2164 4 дня назад +8

    👍👏💪🇨🇳❤️🇨🇳💪👏👍⭐️🎖️⭐️🎖️⭐️🎖️⭐️🎖️⭐️🎖️

  • @mayowa60
    @mayowa60 4 дня назад +1

    as much as i understand the effectiveness of this weapon, china does also seem to be building its own carriers. why do they keep building more carriers when they know how vulnerable they are ?

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

  • @brianliew5901
    @brianliew5901 День назад

    America is so eager to taste the specialties of Chinese delicacies of DF17, DF21, DF26, etc. and such. As usual as a hospitable host, China has many mouthwatering dishes awaiting the Americans. 😋😋😋😋

  • @Kithsiri-lc9wc
    @Kithsiri-lc9wc 4 дня назад +4

    Talk Peace not war .. Sick of this stuff...

    • @vbch1396
      @vbch1396 4 дня назад

      Your statement should be directed to the US. Looking back to the last 50 decades, US has been involved in every war. They produce weapons and export to other allies in the name of peace.

    • @vbch1396
      @vbch1396 4 дня назад +1

      Your statement should be directed to the US. Looking back to the last 50 decades, US has been involved in every war. They produce weapons and export to other allies in the name of peace.

    • @KenHubbard-jz1vq
      @KenHubbard-jz1vq 4 дня назад

      WERE ALL SICK OF AMERICA , AND THE WORLD IS IN REVOLT AGAINST AMERICA FINALLY AMERICA HAS MET IT'S MATCH

  • @HappyPandaBear73
    @HappyPandaBear73 4 дня назад +2

    👍🏼🇨🇳

  • @中国-e8c
    @中国-e8c 4 дня назад +3

    中国🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍

  • @toliu4u
    @toliu4u 3 дня назад

    It is way too late. There is a saying for PLA forces - They will not look for water until their houses are on fire. Too late for China - They even did not understand the importance of Air Carrier strike forces and their impacts. Pettiful!

    • @williamho1976
      @williamho1976 2 дня назад

      Chinese missiles cannot hit a moving target because of their primitive targeting systems. Their missile threat is hollow.

  • @pwu8194
    @pwu8194 4 дня назад

    Can Chinese aircraft carriers survive U.S. nuclear strikes?

  • @viorelpiscanu9425
    @viorelpiscanu9425 4 дня назад +2

    What is this!? Just propaganda for war!?

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 4 дня назад

      Just Facts! U.S does Propaganda! China builds stuff!

    • @jennydeng8641
      @jennydeng8641 4 дня назад

      This is a propaganda for peace. It is the PRC's way of letting those who have thought that the PRC is weak and want to start a war against it to think otherwise. Those are for defenses only. Oh, aircraft carrier killers are meant for aircraft carriers. The only way to prevent a possible US lead invasion of the PRC. The PRC need to be strong enough to fight back, retaliate, and win. A strong PRC will only ensure peace.

    • @Mel_Gerrard
      @Mel_Gerrard 4 дня назад +3

      It's so that people like you can get their panties in a twist.