Most of people in USA won't be able to use this for several reasons: 1) Won't ever get approved. 2) Won't be allowed to land in most private and commercial properties. 3) We all weight more than 200lbs in here...
Nevada state already order a fleet of that, 2 years ago, to deliver human organs and as autonomous flying taxis. So I think you are completly wrong. ;)
People have to understand that the name "drone" means:A machine remotely controlled,because it would be inadequate to send a manned aircraft for risky situations.. Even if it is automatically controlled,when there is a person inside and this person could interfere with the flight,it´s not a drone anymore. Person inside,not a drone.
I love these concepts. I hope I am wrong but I do not see any vehicle with blades exposed at human level being aver approved. They would probably need special pads and require doors to remain locked if blades are in motion.
@@jamestodd945 sounds good to me honestly. Might look unorthodox but it might get the job done. Only thing is at that point you might as well attach a big propeller to the roof and extend it like a helicopter. I think they were trying to keep it small and sexy.
1. Does it have a ballistic parachute? 2. Does it have 2 totally separate, independent flight systems? Batteries, electrical wires, computer, etc.? 3. If so, are the two battery packs set up so you can drop either one if necessary in case one catches on fire? 4. Any fire suppression systems? 5. What collision avoidance system do you have?
Neil Degrass Tyson put it perfectly, Helicopters are actually our flying cars. It's the 4th dimension of travel. It does all the same. Things we imagine flying cars would do, propel upwards, create a lot. Of noise and it flys
Then you should have looked further, the Ehang now also take up two passengers, and tested it with live passengers: ruclips.net/video/Z6BYr383InQ/видео.html
This is a really excellent video. Hyper-interesting, well-researched and your narration is world-class. My only suggestion is not to call this aircraft a drone, because that would imply it is unmanned. A better term might be "autonomous aerial vehicle", or "autonomous VTOL craft". Something of that nature. All good wishes!
it is a drone, it is unmanned, the passenger in it does not fly it, he just goes along for the ride. "A better term might be "autonomous aerial vehicle" no it's not as it is not autonomous.
alo realmente buen video desearía que permanezcan haciendo material de calidad¡¡¡!!! Voy a seguir mirando sus creaciones. Les envio un abrazo chau ❤️👍🏽
the problem with the drone is that it should electrically self balance itself, so you have to trust your life to electric circuits as it has four motors and a gravity sensor to do that while an helicopter is hydraulically commanded by the pilots, thus it is more safer and doesn't need electronic circuits to do self balance as the cabin hangs itself down of the helic so it is normally self balanced just by gravity but anyway you can rise the safety of the drone by creating more than one balancing system and when one breaks down it warns you to get to the nearest place to land on like having eight motors two for each arm (one above one below), two electric circuits and to battery sets commanded separately by the two ''twin'' systems
Its going to need to be slightly bigger. Keep pretty much everything just the way it is. 1 seater and 2 seater options. Circle ringed guards around the propellers for 0 human exposure to blades. Needs to atleast be a hybrid engine. 25 minutes of flight is useless. I need that cockpit to be super crash safe. 1-2 parachutes depending on cockpit size. Ima need the option to divert power incase a propeller goes bad. Tinted windows. UV protected. Id LIKE for the legs to collapse inwards after landing and parking for space reasons. If not possible whatever. Needs to be tested for all kinds of weather and high winds. Maybe more luggage room? If not possible understandable. Other than that i think its great. Easy to use. Easy to maintain. Perfect for quick outings or just flying to buisness meetings, the job or even a nice restaurant. Which is why the 2 seater option is essential. This would be a perfect luxury personal 'flying car'. Once all the kinks are worked out and its approved then improve on the design add a bunch of luxury options, ofcourse the price will increase and i can guarantee people every where will crave one. They would be all over the world in major cities like vegas, dubai, tokyo, miami and paris.
Greag job guys , WOW so skilled , intelligent and full of PASSION which is why if i could afford one id buy one ASAP And alrhough i like the passeger one here i like the single manned ones also . which do i like more ? Idk because I love all your work every one ! KUDOS and REMEBER me bc i will buy one one day you'll see
I see many news programs in USA reporting on this self flying taxi service and asking "when will this arrive in USA". They should ask will the FAA ever approve self flying taxi. There are requirements for qualified human pilot to ferry passengers within USA . I think Dubai, Saudi Arabia and China will be first to have this service but if American tourist gets injured or killed they can forget about suing if it is Chinese company and accident happens in China.
1. You missed it by between 169-200 lbs. 2. You ain't Bruce Lee. 3. You'd trade your chopsticks in for a Whataburger in a nanosecond. ;-)www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?.5f74605345da
It need propeller guards , easier access to the cockpit, perhaps a hing to lift the entire enclosure instead of doors, twice the weight and lift capacity, it need to be able to carry passenger like football players Nate Newton - 400 pounds guard for the Dallas Cowboys, a significantly greater range 30 miles is not enough, Molokai island to Oahu island is 63 miles so I would set a min distance of 70-100 mile range, so battery capacity would need to be increased by 40-60% and finally it needs the ability to be piloted manually then it would be significantly better, and would have a far better chance of being accepted in american airspace by the FAA
Why don't you try it make it affordable to the average consumer... and who would purchase it for 300K for business. The cost and upkeep would outweigh the business revenue.
necessary future...you cant solve traffic problem in one dimension..human population is groving and you cant enlarge ways forever ,ecpecially in expensive city centers...at the end you need multiple ways in the sky in multiple dimensions...another thing sky traffic must be autonomous because you can't leave it to people control...finally you will watch autonomous drone-cars from your home in the skycraper like starwars 3 or star trek..there is no other way..
Of course this is a couple years old now. However for at least 10 years with the lone exception of computer parts which you really don't have a realistic choice, I've avoided made in China at all costs. And with the garbage going on now, I'd just as soon swan dive into an active volcano.
Love your confidence in this technology considering you use the jetpack as a reference and how long is it taking for it to develop and even though it's still is not developed yet. What not much faith in the company or something can't make a video where you're all gung-ho for the product. Got to throw a useless invention from the 60s and try to make it seem better. Why not just hey man this is a cool thing to fly let's see what happens. Nope got to be a half empty glass kind of guy right
May be have make big verity drone, unfortunately 35 kg thurust 1 piece motor have huge prize in kerala 25000, 25000×4=1lak, 4 propeller 90000, muhh dream only dreams
Hello "Wonder World", I really like this video and I´d like to ask you if I could use some scenes for a school project, where I have to create a trailer about public transportation in my city. Therefore I´d be really thankful if you could send me some scenes or allow me to use some from your video. If you want I can send you my final trailer. Greetings from Germany Julian
you can use some for a school project video, but understand I do not own the footage, so I highly suggest you do not use it online, like youtube, if you plan to, get permission from the owners.
The world leader in drones since their inception, is the United States. We invented drones, and the vast majority of them are still made in America (though many do have components made in China and elsewhere). This E-Hang drone is really cool though, and potentially revolutionary.
@Liu Leo - I will have to revisit this comment later to elaborate. But I'm not only talking about consumer drones. I'm speaking of military, scientific, atmospheric, delivery, medical, etc. (all drones in the world). There are 9 drone companies in the SF Bay Area (that I know of), including the one that DJI bought, and that most of DJI drone technology was based upon. Amazon is a drone company for example. So is Boeing. So is Lockheed. There are more than one hundred of them in the United States who are working on, building on, and who pioneered drones of all types (including DJI drones). This is one of those companies my friend worked for a couple years ago: flyzipline.com/ tinyurl.com/y2l973of
@Liu Leo - I agree. EHANG is just one example of that. A huge amount of products manufactured in the United States, - probably somewhere around 30% to 50%, contain components manufactured in China. From aircraft to electronics (and probably drones), it's just like cell phones manufactured in Shenzhen (the Globalization of individual parts and components from 20 countries or so in a typical iPhone). I'm not minimizing the growth or importance of China at all. I'm simply saying that the U.S. is still relevant, and still a huge player in almost every industry. But yeah, startups appear and disappear here also. Silicon Valley for instance was evolved from that precise thing: Entrepreneurs who start up a company and the company fails, so they start another one. Shenzhen, and probably other cities in China (and elsewhere, like Singapore, Tokyo, Bangalore, Seoul, etc.), are very much the same.
deixá o ar prezo deixá sair o ar em um espaço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força vai criar mais impulso na elice CRIAR um turbo deixa o ar sair no es Paço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força mais impulso 👍
Most of people in USA won't be able to use this for several reasons:
1) Won't ever get approved.
2) Won't be allowed to land in most private and commercial properties.
3) We all weight more than 200lbs in here...
Nevada state already order a fleet of that, 2 years ago, to deliver human organs and as autonomous flying taxis. So I think you are completly wrong. ;)
Pablo Hernández - But you are only 10 years old, right?
I am not american and I weight 230 lbs
I weigh 165 and if I had the money I would buy it.
hahah good point, they offer a two seats version can carry 600lbs, dump one seat....
All this new technology is cool and all, but I just want my Jetpack.
keep mak recycle video and maybe yuo get 1Milloin vew rather than th 10 thousans. but drone wit yuotub bucks, no?
Why no? Don't be so pesimistic, open your mind!
People have to understand that the name "drone" means:A machine remotely controlled,because it would be inadequate to send a manned aircraft for risky situations..
Even if it is automatically controlled,when there is a person inside and this person could interfere with the flight,it´s not a drone anymore.
Person inside,not a drone.
Minister in Malaysia call it flying car haha
@@salehhudinmohdnoh4159 it is flying car
I love these concepts. I hope I am wrong but I do not see any vehicle with blades exposed at human level being aver approved. They would probably need special pads and require doors to remain locked if blades are in motion.
Great-ish Owl covers
Just on top of builings. they go from builing to building through the air so there is really no need for solid ground.
I was thinking ring guards around the propellers.
@@goldiedylan1 or why can't the legs be curved to go up safely over head like 8'? Seems simple.
@@jamestodd945 sounds good to me honestly. Might look unorthodox but it might get the job done. Only thing is at that point you might as well attach a big propeller to the roof and extend it like a helicopter. I think they were trying to keep it small and sexy.
1. Does it have a ballistic parachute?
2. Does it have 2 totally separate, independent flight systems? Batteries, electrical wires, computer, etc.?
3. If so, are the two battery packs set up so you can drop either one if necessary in case one catches on fire?
4. Any fire suppression systems?
5. What collision avoidance system do you have?
If that's Chinese then I bet they don't think about such things.
Its an EHang. Just Hang in there.
fire suppression systems? dump the battery then, hahahhaa
@@HenryYeguitarcover just drive into a cloud buddy
Jetpacks have always been impractical. But I could easily see drone passenger flight taking off..
Well done! 2020 is here!!!
Neil Degrass Tyson put it perfectly, Helicopters are actually our flying cars. It's the 4th dimension of travel. It does all the same. Things we imagine flying cars would do, propel upwards, create a lot. Of noise and it flys
Hei I really enjoy your page ☺ Keep it up!
Thanks Joe
Wow, a helicopter...
25 minutes flight time off a two hour charge? That’s to inefficient, engineers should do better.
Ehang took off without passenger at 0:55
Ehang landed without passenger at 2:21
Maybe it is safer to carry packages only.
Then you should have looked further, the Ehang now also take up two passengers, and tested it with live passengers: ruclips.net/video/Z6BYr383InQ/видео.html
This is a really excellent video. Hyper-interesting, well-researched and your narration is world-class. My only suggestion is not to call this aircraft a drone, because that would imply it is unmanned. A better term might be "autonomous aerial vehicle", or "autonomous VTOL craft". Something of that nature. All good wishes!
it is a drone, it is unmanned, the passenger in it does not fly it, he just goes along for the ride.
"A better term might be "autonomous aerial vehicle" no it's not as it is not autonomous.
I bet this makes a popular tourist attraction where it is available.
Roadkill Raccoon won't be for much longer. In about ten years people will be flying to school...
new malaysia flying car.. lol
alo realmente buen video desearía que permanezcan haciendo material de calidad¡¡¡!!! Voy a seguir mirando sus creaciones. Les envio un abrazo chau ❤️👍🏽
Wow,must be loads of them out there flying people around? Hmmmm,not a single one!
This thing has arrived in Malaysia and our minister called it a flying car. We’ll see this thing flying around in Malaysia soon.
😓
Poor thing.
the problem with the drone is that it should electrically self balance itself, so you have to trust your life to electric circuits as it has four motors and a gravity sensor to do that
while an helicopter is hydraulically commanded by the pilots, thus it is more safer and doesn't need electronic circuits to do self balance as the cabin hangs itself down of the helic so it is normally self balanced just by gravity
but anyway you can rise the safety of the drone by creating more than one balancing system and when one breaks down it warns you to get to the nearest place to land on
like having eight motors two for each arm (one above one below), two electric circuits and to battery sets commanded separately by the two ''twin'' systems
and a automatic parachute in case its about to crash or some sort of protective balloon around it that protects the person from impact
Is this the same as the one that just crashed into the waterdoing a press demo?
El futuro es hoy oíste viejo
Ahh, we're going to see some cool shit in this century.
I immagine telling my flying gransons to fly outside the house and not inside XD
Who is first brave passenger ?
من المفترض ان تحل مكان وسائل النقل التقليدية
ولكن بهذا السعر المرتفع و الامكانية المحدودة لبطاريتها ستكون بغير جدوى
👍👍👍
Please coming to Jakarta we need it
Kenya already had one before this one, can fly for up to 30mins and at a top speed of 125km/hr....
COOL
Its going to need to be slightly bigger. Keep pretty much everything just the way it is. 1 seater and 2 seater options. Circle ringed guards around the propellers for 0 human exposure to blades. Needs to atleast be a hybrid engine. 25 minutes of flight is useless. I need that cockpit to be super crash safe. 1-2 parachutes depending on cockpit size. Ima need the option to divert power incase a propeller goes bad. Tinted windows. UV protected. Id LIKE for the legs to collapse inwards after landing and parking for space reasons. If not possible whatever. Needs to be tested for all kinds of weather and high winds. Maybe more luggage room? If not possible understandable. Other than that i think its great. Easy to use. Easy to maintain. Perfect for quick outings or just flying to buisness meetings, the job or even a nice restaurant. Which is why the 2 seater option is essential. This would be a perfect luxury personal 'flying car'. Once all the kinks are worked out and its approved then improve on the design add a bunch of luxury options, ofcourse the price will increase and i can guarantee people every where will crave one. They would be all over the world in major cities like vegas, dubai, tokyo, miami and paris.
Greag job guys , WOW so skilled , intelligent and full of PASSION which is why if i could afford one id buy one ASAP And alrhough i like the passeger one here i like the single manned ones also . which do i like more ? Idk because I love all your work every one ! KUDOS and REMEBER me bc i will buy one one day you'll see
I see many news programs in USA reporting on this self flying taxi service and asking "when will this arrive in USA". They should ask will the FAA ever approve self flying taxi. There are requirements for qualified human pilot to ferry passengers within USA . I think Dubai, Saudi Arabia and China will be first to have this service but if American tourist gets injured or killed they can forget about suing if it is Chinese company and accident happens in China.
Imagine this with an NDB. Infinite range.
I would like to do some inverted Split-S on this. . . 😁
i heard that dubai will introduce these drone taxi. soon. into the city transportation system.
Put some wheels on that.. And I'd buy it!!
that thing costs 320.000 dollars, i don't think you can afford it, even with wheels.
I assume this is going to sink nice and safely from the air in case of electrical fault (irony)?
How is this stock not a million dollars a share
ACIC got a $1B contract from UAL.Done deal.Makes sense.
Won't work in America. 220 pounds max load leaves little for luggage. ;-)
lol I was thinking same thing when i read the specs, I thought that rules out USA & probably Australia too. we be fat also.
yes...average American weigh 369 lbs which is heaver than this thing.
1. You missed it by between 169-200 lbs. 2. You ain't Bruce Lee. 3. You'd trade your chopsticks in for a Whataburger in a nanosecond. ;-)www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/06/12/look-at-how-much-weight-weve-gained-since-the-1960s/?.5f74605345da
Jason Unwin, but if you can’t use it to fly to Pizza Hut, then Pizza Hut can fly 220 lbs of pizza to you. LOL
Good point although I like Papa John's Pizza better than Pizza Hut. ;-)
Not today Skynet.
oh actually we had these for years in Turkey
They were called:
*helicopters*
Only in China
Esta tecnolojia si es buena yano se desgasten en tecnolojia terrestre autos boladores si
Can someone explain to my why the rotor blades are on ground level instead of being on top for safety reasons?
If its on top people will call it helicopter not a flying car anymore. 😷😰
Wheres the drone parachute?
no way this is real
Comments and more comments. I've heard this for years...
#keretaterbang
I second that, WW! GIMME MY JETPaa a a a a a a a k!!!
Bro this basically a helicopter 🤣
It will NEVER gain FAA or EASA type approval or a certificate of airworthiness and so it will NEVER be allowed to carry passengers!
it doesn't need the FAA or EASA until the technology becomes very mature because needs to saturate a market of 1.3+ billion first.
You sit inside that at 100ft you will be terrified - sooooooo dangerous!
It just gained FAA
GO ACROSS CITY IN A BRIEF TIME WITHOUT HEAVY TRAFFIC .
* Insert Invest Meme *
Haha in Malaysia they told this is are fly car made in Malaysia,what a shame
PRICE??
wow taxi dore from indonesia 👍
It need propeller guards , easier access to the cockpit, perhaps a hing to lift the entire enclosure instead of doors, twice the weight and lift capacity, it need to be able to carry passenger like football players Nate Newton - 400 pounds guard for the Dallas Cowboys, a significantly greater range 30 miles is not enough, Molokai island to Oahu island is 63 miles so I would set a min distance of 70-100 mile range, so battery capacity would need to be increased by 40-60% and finally it needs the ability to be piloted manually then it would be significantly better, and would have a far better chance of being accepted in american airspace by the FAA
Don't like how this video goes back and forth between Imperial and Metric. Km's then miles per hour then kg then feet. Pick one and stick with it.
useful for chopping trees.
What type of motor we can use in agriculture drone
Why don't you try it make it affordable to the average consumer... and who would purchase it for 300K for business. The cost and upkeep would outweigh the business revenue.
I don't think this aircraft could ever get past a $2.5 billion wall though. IMPOSSIBLE!! ;-) ...ROFLMAO
Ellon Musk should invest
so they make it for 70.000 and sold for 270.000 thats shitty
100kg payload? Not in the US, lol.
Perfect vessle to deliver nukes easily..
necessary future...you cant solve traffic problem in one dimension..human population is groving and you cant enlarge ways forever ,ecpecially in expensive city centers...at the end you need multiple ways in the sky in multiple dimensions...another thing sky traffic must be
autonomous because you can't leave it to people control...finally you will watch autonomous drone-cars from your home in the skycraper like starwars 3 or star trek..there is no other way..
wait i see a problem here
isnt the whole point of drone is that you dont need humans in it? this literally destroys the whole point of drones lmao
How loud is it?
Not as louad as an helicopter
This design is useless because strong wind will make it rollover, the center of weight have to be at the blade level or under it
2:30 AMOG US!
Lol
Of course this is a couple years old now. However for at least 10 years with the lone exception of computer parts which you really don't have a realistic choice, I've avoided made in China at all costs. And with the garbage going on now, I'd just as soon swan dive into an active volcano.
Isn't Helicopter the same thing
nothing alike really
Yea nothing alike buddy
You can google what Helicopter looks like
it would be better if its two seated
Love your confidence in this technology considering you use the jetpack as a reference and how long is it taking for it to develop and even though it's still is not developed yet. What not much faith in the company or something can't make a video where you're all gung-ho for the product. Got to throw a useless invention from the 60s and try to make it seem better. Why not just hey man this is a cool thing to fly let's see what happens. Nope got to be a half empty glass kind of guy right
May be have make big verity drone, unfortunately 35 kg thurust 1 piece motor have huge prize in kerala 25000, 25000×4=1lak, 4 propeller 90000, muhh dream only dreams
Poor man's Helicopter lol
Hello "Wonder World",
I really like this video and I´d like to ask you if I could use some scenes for a school project, where I have to create a trailer about public transportation in my city.
Therefore I´d be really thankful if you could send me some scenes or allow me to use some from your video.
If you want I can send you my final trailer.
Greetings from Germany
Julian
you can use some for a school project video, but understand I do not own the footage, so I highly suggest you do not use it online, like youtube, if you plan to, get permission from the owners.
Who invented UFO😁I will by his invention in worth of gold😀
Made in China? Thanks, I'm fine.
Is there anything made outside China?
The world leader in drones since their inception, is the United States. We invented drones, and the vast majority of them are still made in America (though many do have components made in China and elsewhere). This E-Hang drone is really cool though, and potentially revolutionary.
@Liu Leo - I will have to revisit this comment later to elaborate. But I'm not only talking about consumer drones. I'm speaking of military, scientific, atmospheric, delivery, medical, etc. (all drones in the world). There are 9 drone companies in the SF Bay Area (that I know of), including the one that DJI bought, and that most of DJI drone technology was based upon. Amazon is a drone company for example. So is Boeing. So is Lockheed. There are more than one hundred of them in the United States who are working on, building on, and who pioneered drones of all types (including DJI drones). This is one of those companies my friend worked for a couple years ago: flyzipline.com/ tinyurl.com/y2l973of
@Liu Leo - I agree. EHANG is just one example of that. A huge amount of products manufactured in the United States, - probably somewhere around 30% to 50%, contain components manufactured in China. From aircraft to electronics (and probably drones), it's just like cell phones manufactured in Shenzhen (the Globalization of individual parts and components from 20 countries or so in a typical iPhone). I'm not minimizing the growth or importance of China at all. I'm simply saying that the U.S. is still relevant, and still a huge player in almost every industry. But yeah, startups appear and disappear here also. Silicon Valley for instance was evolved from that precise thing: Entrepreneurs who start up a company and the company fails, so they start another one. Shenzhen, and probably other cities in China (and elsewhere, like Singapore, Tokyo, Bangalore, Seoul, etc.), are very much the same.
@Liu Leo- The entire world knows that.
У меня другой вариант летателного аппарата. Мой будет спросом пользаваться ваш нет.)))
deixá o ar prezo deixá sair o ar em um espaço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força vai criar mais impulso na elice CRIAR um turbo deixa o ar sair no es Paço pequeno o ar vai sair com mais força mais impulso 👍
🏹🌍✍️🇺🇸
apparently the CEO/Co-Founder of Ehang Inc Huazhi Hu died in a test flight crash. But they're not really talking about it too much.
can't find news about it, but then again, how many died centuries ago walking, navigating the seas, and flying for a safer today?
Made in China
like everything else
You dont control it....fuuuuuck that
First
bored same video
This company ended up being a fraud. You should take this video down
wolfpack is a fraud!