How the woman at Jesus's tomb help prove the resurrection

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • Today we'll be discussing how the eye witness testimony from the women at Jesus's tomb help prove the resurrection.
    Contra Cesum, by Origen - www.newadvent....
    Josephus on women testimony - www.perseus.tu...
    Josephus on Jesus - • Josephus on Jesus

Комментарии • 32

  • @senpaimami2496
    @senpaimami2496 Год назад +3

    We are all one in Christ Jesus. ❤

  • @SanctusApologetics
    @SanctusApologetics  Год назад +4

    send feedback !

  • @mr.boboman5701
    @mr.boboman5701 Год назад +5

    Wow beautifully said as always

  • @christophernichols1379
    @christophernichols1379 Год назад +2

    Interesting. It would seem that Jesus was the great emancipator of women. Thanks for the knowledge.

  • @nico0826
    @nico0826 Год назад +3

    For the algorithm :)

  • @bradpiff6836
    @bradpiff6836 Месяц назад

    For the algorithm ❤

  • @biblicus8204
    @biblicus8204 Год назад +1

    Os Soldados Romanos também foram testemunhas da Ressurreição de Jesus - embora de maneira indireta.

  • @apostolicfollower
    @apostolicfollower Год назад +1

    for the algorithm!

  • @abrechter1489
    @abrechter1489 Год назад +1

    for the algorithm

  • @isaaclosh8082
    @isaaclosh8082 Год назад +1

    Interesting how no one saw Jesus after his “resurrection” except for people who already believed in him. This is common in false religions, such as Mormonism. A claim like this is either fiction or the result of severe cognitive dissonance and attachment leading to visions, hallucinations or “spiritual experiences.” It’s very common for people who have lost a loved one to think they “see” them, or dream about them. It’s especially ironic that he told the Pharisees and the Sadducees that he would give them the “sign of Jonah” (which isn’t even a thing), but he never gave them the sign - he never went back to present himself to them after his resurrection, which is what he said he would do but never did. He never did because when he died he stayed dead.

    • @mariannelopez6738
      @mariannelopez6738 Год назад +4

      The apostles gave their lives for their faith in Christ's resurrection. Had they made it up that extreme step makes no sense at all. Also secular sources mention Jesus's crusifying

    • @mariannelopez6738
      @mariannelopez6738 Год назад +3

      A sign is a miracle. Jesus did plenty of those.Are you an unbeliever. The sign of Jonah is that one came to preach to them and they (ninevites) repented from their sins and turned to God. They were more worthy in humility than the self rigtheous pharisees and jews (in general not all of them)

    • @prrboricua
      @prrboricua Год назад +1

      ​​@@mariannelopez6738
      1st do name the Apostles who die for believing that Jesus resurrected.
      2nd Think about examples of people willing to die for false beliefs.

    • @mariannelopez6738
      @mariannelopez6738 Год назад

      @@prrboricua You are absolutely making no sense. They knew Jesus if he did not rise from the death they made it up. They were both tortured and told to recant but they did not. If they had made it up true pain would be ridiculous to stand for what to them is a known lie.
      Really I am astounded you can not see plain logic. I guess people really reject God against all reason to live wickedly.

    • @mariannelopez6738
      @mariannelopez6738 Год назад

      @@prrboricua All except John look up the history. Also look up about Nero who persecuted Christians for their faith.

  • @aubreyleonae4108
    @aubreyleonae4108 Год назад

    A story says a thing. Absolute proof for anything imaginable is proof of nothing. Not even a decent story.

    • @SanctusApologetics
      @SanctusApologetics  Год назад +3

      You can never have absolute proof of anything , a historian looks for where the evidence suggests.

    • @prrboricua
      @prrboricua Год назад

      @SanctusApologetics Yes, indeed, you are correct, and historians typically discount miracles. It is all about probabilities. For example, do you consider zombies walking around Jerusalem at Jesus' death, per the gospel of Matthew, a historical event?

    • @SanctusApologetics
      @SanctusApologetics  Год назад +1

      @@prrboricua I don’t because I believe ,along with many scholars , that matthew is using a literary device called hyperbole . Therefore matthew isn’t actually saying these people rose from the dead . He’s exaggerating the situation . Just study the scholar mike licona , he gets into this issue.

    • @prrboricua
      @prrboricua Год назад

      @SanctusApologetics Then how can you or anyone 2000 years later decide what's a portent or not? Is the part of the Red Sea a portent? Is Noah's flood a portent? Is Jonah story a portent?
      Do you see the issue here? Either the Bible is the inerrant word of a god as is written or is opened to wide interpretations. God, as a communicator, then sucks.

    • @SanctusApologetics
      @SanctusApologetics  Год назад

      @@prrboricua that’s why i use the early church fathers who are connected to the aposltes to make judgements on scripture

  • @bartbannister394
    @bartbannister394 Год назад

    Nice fairytale.

    • @SanctusApologetics
      @SanctusApologetics  Год назад +6

      Thanks for watching , what brought you to that conclusion though? Im a devout Christian , yet wouldn't say all of islam is a fairy tale, their is histicoral aspects of it.

    • @kriegjaeger
      @kriegjaeger Год назад +3

      @@SanctusApologetics
      It's remarkable that the extent of human history was Polytheistic until the church age and now the age of Mockers and Scoffers. Polytheists had no problem accepting yet another god, but the Scoffers deny god at all thinking themselves superior to all before them.

    • @SanctusApologetics
      @SanctusApologetics  Год назад +4

      @@kriegjaeger thank you for that reply , i agree

  • @endygonewild2899
    @endygonewild2899 Год назад

    For the algorithm