Even when Roger used to lose he would be a bigger part of the highlights thanks to his playing style. That was not the case here. Very rare to see a player (excluding Rafa) hit so many winners against Roger. And it's Andy of all people, lol. What a great match! Miss these legends ❤
Happened to be the last match Murray won against Fed. Fed switched to a larger racket the following year, and Murray had no answers to that in their subsequent meetings.
Yeh tbf though Murray had that back surgery end of 2014 I think that played a party in his losses. Kit saying federwr wouldn’t have won matches as he did in Wimbledon 2015 but Murray took 6 months to get back to his best.
@@LimebradleyMurray had the back surgery at the end of 2013. In 2015 he was well back to his best. Reached the AO final, Miami final, won his first ever clay court masters title in Madrid, lost in the Roland Garros semifinal in 5 sets to Djokovic, Wimbledon semis to Federer and won Canada against Djokovic in straight sets and reached the Paris final as well
True. 2014 was a very weak year for Andy though! He was not even close to his 2008-2013 / 2015-2017 form, his head to heads against all the big guys in 2014 were weak.
@@TomTom-vm8qs it’s a big 3. Murray was very good but the other 3 were on a different level. All you need to do is look at their careers compared to his. It’s not close.
2012-2013 Murray was a sight to behold. The only period where there was an actually big4 in terms of match ups. The 4 of them were all playing great and Andy started collecting lots of wins against the big3 during these 2 years.
If not for injuries murray is not unferior to djokovic I remember in 2009/2010 he was even better at times than novak , murray getting injured in the end of 2013 he needed a full year before coming back to that level in 2015-2016 but in that time djokovic made progress and gained confidence no need to talk about the hip injury in 2017 wich effectively ended his carreer
@@angerisdiscipline3913 he was definitely finding his grooves after the wimbledon win in 2013. From Wim12 to Wim13 he made 4 consecutive GS finals (he skipped RG13) and won 2 of them. If he kept up that form we would def have had a true big4 era.
2011-2016 was peak 'big four' era. All of them reached multiple Slam finals. Murray started to accrue Slams, and outperformed Federer as a whole for that period. To be fair, 'Big four' was a term that existed as soon as Murray and Djokovic were winning Masters and reaching Slam finals (and semi finals consistently) to be fair, so from 2008 to Murray's injury in 2017. It was mainly referring to the fact that any given big title - masters, ATP finals, slam, Olympics etc it was a a surprise if one or more of them didn't make a Semi final.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe this was the only win Murray achieved against Federer at Grand Slam level. As others have said - Murray could’ve wrapped this up in 3/4 sets and maybe that would’ve given him a little more in the final against Djokovic. Who knows. Very tough to beat two of the big 3 back to back in a Grand Slam.
@@astrahcat1212slower pace what? Surface? No evidence that the courts were slowed down… as a matter of fact, this blue AO court (plexicushion) was actually rated “medium fast” compared to the previous AO green court rebound ace which was rated “medium” by the ITF. This myth that the courts getting slowed down was just an idea that the Frauderer fans spread to make them feel good about their idol.
If Federer had the mental toughness and consistency under pressure to convert key victories vs. Murray and Djokovic, then you wouldn't be saying this. Also, actually watch the points play out. Murray hits offensive shots all the time. Deep balls with pace, in the corners, etc. Those are offensive shots, not defensive. Saying Murray is just a defensive counter puncher is reductive and just shows you don't know much.
@@sawgames8623 Murray's game style is the very definition of a defensive counterpunching game style. Djokovic can take the offence to his opponents, but he too is essentially a counterpuncher, an aggressive counterpuncher more precisely. But, Murray is not and never was.
@@СергейПахомов-д6б Federer was hoping for good serves and an attacking play to stay in the match. Murray was outstanding physically, mentally and his game was untochable.
Murray is actually pretty aggressive in this match and it's when he had most of his success - when he was with Lendl, relatively injury free, and being less of a pusher. He reached 4 consecutive Slam finals 2012-2013 (of the ones he entered), winning 2 of them. This could have been a 3 set match. Murray gifted what should have been a smash winner to give Federer a window to win the 2nd set, and then failed to serve out in the 4th set too. That's another criticisim of him, just wasn't as Clutch as Djokovic.
@@Luchon20082010 He did not. Murray was on top the whole match and Federer was clinging on. it's only Federer's brilliance that made the scoreline look tight. It was one of the greatest performances of AM's career.
@@Luchon20082010 Bro murray failed a smash to gift 2nd set, and also failed to serve out in the 4th. Eventually got his act together and completley smashed Fed up in the 5th to finally get the match over.
Even when Roger used to lose he would be a bigger part of the highlights thanks to his playing style. That was not the case here. Very rare to see a player (excluding Rafa) hit so many winners against Roger. And it's Andy of all people, lol. What a great match! Miss these legends ❤
Happened to be the last match Murray won against Fed. Fed switched to a larger racket the following year, and Murray had no answers to that in their subsequent meetings.
Yeh tbf though Murray had that back surgery end of 2014 I think that played a party in his losses. Kit saying federwr wouldn’t have won matches as he did in Wimbledon 2015 but Murray took 6 months to get back to his best.
@@LimebradleyMurray had the back surgery at the end of 2013. In 2015 he was well back to his best. Reached the AO final, Miami final, won his first ever clay court masters title in Madrid, lost in the Roland Garros semifinal in 5 sets to Djokovic, Wimbledon semis to Federer and won Canada against Djokovic in straight sets and reached the Paris final as well
True. 2014 was a very weak year for Andy though! He was not even close to his 2008-2013 / 2015-2017 form, his head to heads against all the big guys in 2014 were weak.
One of the my favorite semifinal in big4
It was a big 3 not 4.
@@MarkLeel
BIG4.
Don’t try play that game kid.
@@TomTom-vm8qs it’s a big 3. Murray was very good but the other 3 were on a different level. All you need to do is look at their careers compared to his. It’s not close.
Anyone else pick up on Roger going “F*cking lucky” @ 9:08 😂
2012-2013 Murray was a sight to behold. The only period where there was an actually big4 in terms of match ups. The 4 of them were all playing great and Andy started collecting lots of wins against the big3 during these 2 years.
If not for injuries murray is not unferior to djokovic I remember in 2009/2010 he was even better at times than novak , murray getting injured in the end of 2013 he needed a full year before coming back to that level in 2015-2016 but in that time djokovic made progress and gained confidence no need to talk about the hip injury in 2017 wich effectively ended his carreer
@@angerisdiscipline3913 he was definitely finding his grooves after the wimbledon win in 2013. From Wim12 to Wim13 he made 4 consecutive GS finals (he skipped RG13) and won 2 of them. If he kept up that form we would def have had a true big4 era.
2011-2016 was peak 'big four' era. All of them reached multiple Slam finals. Murray started to accrue Slams, and outperformed Federer as a whole for that period. To be fair, 'Big four' was a term that existed as soon as Murray and Djokovic were winning Masters and reaching Slam finals (and semi finals consistently) to be fair, so from 2008 to Murray's injury in 2017. It was mainly referring to the fact that any given big title - masters, ATP finals, slam, Olympics etc it was a a surprise if one or more of them didn't make a Semi final.
Best I have ever seen Murray play...
this is one of the most aggressive match in grand slam history
10:22 Oh, that smooth forehand..👍
Best and smoothest forehand of all time
That L
When times were relatively normal… 😢
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe this was the only win Murray achieved against Federer at Grand Slam level. As others have said - Murray could’ve wrapped this up in 3/4 sets and maybe that would’ve given him a little more in the final against Djokovic. Who knows. Very tough to beat two of the big 3 back to back in a Grand Slam.
Murray obviously choked in the second set.
I can't believe that defensive counterpunchers can beat attacking players
Did you watch the match😂 Murray hit more winners and was just as aggressive dingbat
You just outlined why 2010+ slower pace did
@@astrahcat1212slower pace what? Surface? No evidence that the courts were slowed down… as a matter of fact, this blue AO court (plexicushion) was actually rated “medium fast” compared to the previous AO green court rebound ace which was rated “medium” by the ITF. This myth that the courts getting slowed down was just an idea that the Frauderer fans spread to make them feel good about their idol.
If Federer had the mental toughness and consistency under pressure to convert key victories vs. Murray and Djokovic, then you wouldn't be saying this. Also, actually watch the points play out. Murray hits offensive shots all the time. Deep balls with pace, in the corners, etc. Those are offensive shots, not defensive. Saying Murray is just a defensive counter puncher is reductive and just shows you don't know much.
@@sawgames8623 Murray's game style is the very definition of a defensive counterpunching game style. Djokovic can take the offence to his opponents, but he too is essentially a counterpuncher, an aggressive counterpuncher more precisely. But, Murray is not and never was.
Passive Roger Federer!
where is collins v swiatek full match from this year i'm still waiting
no one cares about woman tennis
@@1904forever bruhhh
@@uap24Sad but true...
Great match❤
The only time Murray beat Federer in a Grand Slam, and Roger ended up injured.
Beat him in Olympic final
And 3 other occasions😁
@@peterabnormal327 No one cares about Olympics.
Or suddenly Massu became relevant.
@@masters.1000 ok mate
@@masters.1000, your opinion is not universal. Legends like Rafa and Novak do care about Olympics.
@@sanchayanroy8699 Now, but it wasn't the case before.
Most one sided five setter ever.
What does it mean?
@@СергейПахомов-д6б Federer was hoping for good serves and an attacking play to stay in the match.
Murray was outstanding physically, mentally and his game was untochable.
@@СергейПахомов-д6б as in yes, it was 5 sets, but when one dissects the match, federer was completely outplayed from start to finish
@@chrispybisscuitthis has similarities with Wimbledon 2019. Except here, Federer could not keep his clutch in the fifth and Andy held his nerve.
Yeah, Federer was insanely dominant in this match
Roger slice, flick shot, drop shot, top spin, flat and volley.
Murray just pushing the ball back in the game
Maybe thats why he lost... too many silly balls
Federer lost because Murray was serving great. Federer's topspin backhand was subpar, hence those "silly" shots.
Also back injury...
Murray is actually pretty aggressive in this match and it's when he had most of his success - when he was with Lendl, relatively injury free, and being less of a pusher. He reached 4 consecutive Slam finals 2012-2013 (of the ones he entered), winning 2 of them.
This could have been a 3 set match. Murray gifted what should have been a smash winner to give Federer a window to win the 2nd set, and then failed to serve out in the 4th set too. That's another criticisim of him, just wasn't as Clutch as Djokovic.
If Andy played like this during their Aussi final he would have had 4 slams but that was before his break through.
Federer backhand way better in the 2010 AO final.
👏👏👏👏👏👏
I wish Federer could get to final so we all would see how Djokovic destroyes him on final
Murray dog walked him the entire match and should have wrapped it up in straights. 4 sets max.
How?? Federer absolutely outplayed him
@@Luchon20082010 He did not. Murray was on top the whole match and Federer was clinging on. it's only Federer's brilliance that made the scoreline look tight. It was one of the greatest performances of AM's career.
@@Luchon20082010 Bro murray failed a smash to gift 2nd set, and also failed to serve out in the 4th. Eventually got his act together and completley smashed Fed up in the 5th to finally get the match over.
but but they said federerexpres is the BEST! The best is beaten! 😢
Federer is indeed the best to ever play the game
@@initialize21 Yeah thats why he comes behind Djodal regarding gs/masters etc😅
@@Mythos189you realize Joke won the majority of his titles from 2018 to 2023, the weakest era of all time, right? 😂😂😂
@@initialize21I bet you wouldn’t have said that if Nadal had Noles success in this period😂😂😂
@@initialize21so he still has more title than Federer
Wool socks to bed > drug addiction cure🟨