The Unification of Physics: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 окт 2024

Комментарии • 70

  • @swarsur
    @swarsur 9 лет назад +4

    So well said Max:
    It is better to have questions that you can't answer than to have answers that you can't question.

  • @geoffreyah
    @geoffreyah 7 лет назад +1

    I completely agree. A theory of everything for physicists is always limited to the physical forces energy and matter. Therefore it cannot answer the metaphysical question because they don't consider anything which does not show any physical effects to be real. There can be a science of meaning, symbol and ideas. A science is not limited to the physical; It can be a system and organized body of knowledge and principles built of non material meanings like morality, evolution of consciousness, values, religion, philosophy, myth etc.

  • @gerrynightingale9045
    @gerrynightingale9045 9 лет назад +2

    "All of the energy and matter that existed still exists. Matter does not create energy of itself. The actions of matter enable energy to become manifest".

  • @WenzelMartini
    @WenzelMartini 8 лет назад +1

    Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time:
    Applications to Quantum Physics,
    Cosmology and Chaotic Systems
    by L. NOTTALE

  • @michaeldavidmoreno5275
    @michaeldavidmoreno5275 9 лет назад

    Well.. i would like to state that i did figure out a correct atomic model that does include photon energy and defines electrons from the start by using the principle of polarity: all things have polarity; all things have their opposite and their extremes meet. It is now literally the Theory of Everything as is DOES answer what electrons and photon energy is. it answers everything else we ignored with labels: gravity, the sun, magnets, radiation, RUclips response videos: the Kybalion & Physics.

  • @richmeister1960
    @richmeister1960 9 лет назад

    You understand a language I need to learn, thank you Enlong Chiou. I will investigate further.

  • @CV_CA
    @CV_CA 8 лет назад +4

    Thanks for posting this program.

  • @reclavea
    @reclavea 9 лет назад +2

    The Physics of Consciousness! Great response Mr. Tegmark!

  • @modvs1
    @modvs1 9 лет назад

    Sometimes the capacity for representation is used not so much as an aid to task pertinent cognition, but as a means to social interaction- otherwise known as social coordination masquerading as reality tracking.

  • @MrKorrazonCold
    @MrKorrazonCold 9 лет назад

    Everything is formed by a surrounding 4pi Spherical inward absorption +1=0 now -1 outward emission of electromagnetic waves.. . .All motion is 2pi Spiral.. . .
    And all 3D directions are 4pi Spherically curved.. . .Velocity equals time density +1=0 now -1 density of space-time.. . . V=td +1=0 now -1 ds-t.. . .
    Time is inverse multiplying +1=0 now -1 dividing like frequency and wavelength.. . .
    Energy compression = mass now. de-compressing constant C2.. . .
    Now space is a division of solidity into entropy as time unfolds C2 the second law of thermodynamics.. . .But also in the future E2 will equal a multiplication of Volume +1=0 now at the expense of gravitational potential -1.. . .E2=M2 C4+P2 C2.. . .

  • @enlongchiou
    @enlongchiou 9 лет назад

    fuse h , c together get HC=ER,((hg/c^3)(hc/g))=10^-(35+7) for length,mass of plank, 10^-(27+15) for proton, 10^-(30+10+2) for Bohr atom (2 for fine structure constant) all have 10^-42, make 10^84 proton in universe in gravity field balance one proton which hold by strong force which 10^42 stronger than gravity , if hold HC constant in every energy shell in atom, then get 2n^2 formula, because 2*(1/2)=4*(1/4)=9*(1/9)=HC, only change space structure between shell. everything is connect by HC.

  • @karlpages1970
    @karlpages1970 7 лет назад +1

    GENETICS - the beneficial techniques of the lesser groups must be
    adapted by the greater portion, for success of humans.
    You are automated by this code and will never stop being the universal
    extension of its development - in the realm of the "human magnitude".
    What groups and interactions can we measure. Can we communicate a
    social rationality?
    1. As a species population increases, the possible number of capable
    interactions increases.
    So, as elite group dominate resources -via mental and physical force;
    including Money, propaganda and weaponry(arms)- THE ,EVER INCREASING,
    MINORITIES MUST CONTINUOUSLY ADAPT WITH SHARING AND SUPPORTING
    TECHNIQUES USING AN IMPROVED MEMORY AND TRUST SYsTEM; SO AS TO MAINTAIN
    COOPERATION FOR LONGER TIMEFRAMES.
    2. tHE "ELITE MINORITY" INEVITABLY SENSE THIS AND TIGHTEN CONTROLS. An
    attempt to lessen the success of its competitors.
    ( So, will the "subordinate minorities( subordinate majority)"
    always be needed to develop and work out solutions?)
    Reasons for and administering crackdown may include but not limited to:
    - We are working in your interests ,seemingly, because we are attacking
    powers ( other manipulators)
    reasonably subordinate to ourselves.
    - Adding noise to the information gathering. An example is using the
    power of mass media. By repeating, seemingly insignificant, words in
    such a way as too make more out of some minor scientific sub category of
    skin colour. People have attempted this with the word "Race" using
    mass pop psychology. Quite successfully in America and UK...
    Growing popularism in Australia.
    3. Current adaptions needed for the sustainability:
    - Overcome the fear of failure and the lack of confidence in the
    techniques that we have used many times before to overcome similar
    problems. Innovation !....No more relying on massacring distant
    relatives for resources.
    - Why have each one of us not made ourselves and our neighbour self
    sufficient in energy.
    1. Who will now calculate the energy per household needed.
    2. Who will design lighting and cooking systems to be costed?
    3. The same with production and distribution of water systems for
    cleaning and food assembling...
    4. Sewage treatment and medicine, even if people were not driving and
    maintaining roads.
    4. Reason not to worry: As we work together to solve each minor problem
    , 1by1. We are taking control of our own lives and consider this...
    As Technology performs all the trivial tasks. there is going to be
    more health and education and less reasons for the individuals or
    the corporations to commit crime. BANKS WILL ONE DAY BE A PRIMITIVE
    CONCEPT OF THE PAST...

  • @brankozivlak3291
    @brankozivlak3291 8 лет назад +1

    If they only understood some of the philosophers of nature, a few centuries before, thay would know a lot more about this topic.

  • @sherlockholmeslives.1605
    @sherlockholmeslives.1605 9 лет назад +2

    I wish Max Tegmark would use the right word!!! He doesn't mean 'Schizophrenic' early on in this discussion, he means 'Split Minded' or 'Split Idea'. Max Tegmark being such a smart arse should know that he is one of the millions of people adding to the misunderstanding of what 'Schizophrenic' means!!!

    • @M1KEMEX
      @M1KEMEX 9 лет назад +2

      +Mike Fuller From what I know the guy is Swedish and English is his second language. You should have a bit of understanding.

  • @ufotofu9
    @ufotofu9 8 лет назад

    So I have studied physics, but I have never once heard a decent explanation of why a) Gravity and the other three forces have not been unified and b) why Gravity requires a quantum explanation. Why can't Gravity just be though of as a tendency, like falling. Falling doesn't require Field equations and such.
    I like Max Tegmark, but he gets a bit too Woo Woo with the consciousness stuff.

    •  8 лет назад +1

      You should have a go at Neil turok, the astonishing simplicity of everything.

  • @sywaddr11
    @sywaddr11 7 лет назад

    Big bang can not explain infinity relation with finite condition, why you keep saying big bang?

  • @daxxonjabiru428
    @daxxonjabiru428 9 лет назад

    Great talk. Moderator got in the way at times, but quite interesting. (And may I say truly a clutch performance from Dr. Freese.)

  • @robertocabanas9355
    @robertocabanas9355 9 лет назад

    Many other beings on earth are selfaware, and capable of complex thinking, probably different from our thinking.
    When someone say "it's all about us", I imagine it's all about me, in the same way a dolphin might be feeling "it's all happening to me" and all there is, is what he sees and feels.
    I mean, it might be all about consciousness, regardless the source of it.

  • @richmeister1960
    @richmeister1960 9 лет назад

    Wise words!

  • @ramtha9
    @ramtha9 9 лет назад

    Why so much worry about where it started? where are you now?

  • @martin36369
    @martin36369 7 лет назад

    "Soul--fiel" could be the Collective Wave-functions of the Body

  • @martin36369
    @martin36369 7 лет назад

    0.Non-eternalUniverse / Eternal Universe
    1.Nothing, Creatio ex Nihlo / Infinite Multiverse
    2.Singularity/ Non-singularity
    3.Big Bang / Big Bangs / Big Bounce / Cold Whimper
    4.Inflationary / Non-inflationary
    5.Expanding / Expanding-Contracting
    6.Cosmological Principle / No Cosmological Principle
    7.Perfect Cosmological Principle / No Perfect Cosmological Principle
    8.Rotating / Non-rotating / Counter Rotating
    9.Fractual / Non-fractual
    10.Dark Matter / M.O.N.D. Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    11.Dark Energy / Cosmic Void Theory
    12.Constant C / Variable C
    13.Four Dimensional / Hyperdimensional
    14.Black Holes / Black Stars / Dark Energy Stars / Eternally Collapsing Objects / Gravastars
    15.Cosmic Strings / No Cosmic Strings
    16.Mach’s Principle / No Mach’s Principle
    17.Space-Time Wormholes / Holeless
    18.Open / Flat / Closed

  • @fadhelsalih3960
    @fadhelsalih3960 9 лет назад

    Hello Every One ..... i think i have the answer for this quest, i can explain the all four forces in one theory,and its simpler than we thought it will be,

  • @feandjk2
    @feandjk2 9 лет назад

    Ni una vez mencionada la palabra fragmentacion... :(

  • @baharmarzban2830
    @baharmarzban2830 6 лет назад +2

    srsly!! I am a physist, there arguments were contradictory...Physics explains how, puts theories on experiences, it has never been able to answer why?! and the lady knows everything apparently, why do you die? stop death, yes we know what happens in the process of dying (we assume we do), but why do we die. Why does gravity or electricity do what it does, we know what these forces do, but why do they do what they do? Why does an electron like a Proton? why doesn't it like itself? And do you think there are a certain amount of questions in the universe, for you to answer, so once you answered you can live happily? Or is opening one box of questions leed to 100 more? These people are so lost in there arrogance. I will stay respectful to Socrates that said: ""I know that I know nothing","The only thing I know, is that I know nothing" or "I know one thing; that I know nothing". Lets see how many ppl remember your names in 1000 years.
    Jesus ppl get a grip!

  • @michaeldavidmoreno5275
    @michaeldavidmoreno5275 9 лет назад +1

    modern science 'framwork' is incorrect. that's the problem, they just keep going with it, but its foundation was never explained. in case some forgot, the atomic model proposed and accepted by Chadwick in 1932 did not define electrons, included neutrons (when there is nothing neutral in nature), and did not include photon energy. Also, despite the periodic table's information that electrons only cause mass, modern science has us believing that electrons cause electricity- its photon energy.

  • @alphaomega1089
    @alphaomega1089 7 лет назад

    Is it pointless to be alive to attach that word to the universe? That guy is right!
    Can you imaging a city is alive? If not you think like a cell.

  • @macsheadroom3209
    @macsheadroom3209 9 лет назад

    so let's have it....

  • @copleysq
    @copleysq 9 лет назад

    The notion of beginning is absurdly reific. There is no need for
    there ever to have been beginning. Relationship simply IS.
    Evolution expresses relationship of individual with environment;
    evolving happens, together.
    All physics forces express cosmic relationship; that is what they
    do; they are expressions of cosmic relationship.
    There is nothing but Relationship-manifesting-itself.
    elf robert chadis

  • @CrowClouds
    @CrowClouds 7 лет назад

    Should have had on Nassim Haramein, who actually has a theory

  • @abazaba2276
    @abazaba2276 8 лет назад

    I am aware of the earth being flat, leave a gyro on for 12 hrs, and if the earth is a spinning ball it would slowly appear to flip as the earth spins... if the earth is flat, it will stay level!

    •  8 лет назад +1

      remember to tell ur kids about 72 virgins if they kill them self.

  • @JoshYates
    @JoshYates 9 лет назад

    Religion 2.0 response was well said @ 19:24

  • @cymoonrbacpro9426
    @cymoonrbacpro9426 4 года назад +2

    Higgs is highly questionable!

  • @danielwoodwardcomposer2040
    @danielwoodwardcomposer2040 9 лет назад

    An impossible proposition 'The theory of Everything', because the theory would be included in everything. Please!!! Please come to your senses scientists!
    Surely they mean 'the theory of the universe'.

    • @dangiscongrataway2365
      @dangiscongrataway2365 8 лет назад

      No, from the theory of everything you should derive any phenomena in the universe, physics or unphysical.

    • @danielwoodwardcomposer2040
      @danielwoodwardcomposer2040 8 лет назад

      But the theory can never be separate from everything.

  • @fadhelsalih3960
    @fadhelsalih3960 9 лет назад

    Defiantly am not famous but I have a humble point of view that may answer this quest

  • @muhammadalkhawarizmi3630
    @muhammadalkhawarizmi3630 8 лет назад

    16:00 Its a problem with us not nature.

  • @orangeSoda35
    @orangeSoda35 9 лет назад

    This is the first time I've commented on this video, in this universe.

  • @FranckBarfety
    @FranckBarfety 9 лет назад +2

    "Science is based on a framework, but where did the framework come from?" Marcelo Gleiser.

  • @DarkSparkCannabis
    @DarkSparkCannabis 6 лет назад +1

    2:58 listen. If you havn't tried it yet, buy some Ayahuasca, you can make it in your home, just google it. ;)

  • @pablock0
    @pablock0 7 лет назад

    Gleiser!

  • @sywaddr11
    @sywaddr11 7 лет назад

    When you speak with quantum theory and waiting for dark particles to be found? …… hummmmmm……

  • @isaacberryXERXEESE
    @isaacberryXERXEESE 9 лет назад

    I got a cesium clock in a centrifuge. Hide from that.

  • @bris1tol
    @bris1tol 8 лет назад

    The Theory of everything.
    You can only understand the universe in all its aspects (quantum in addition to physical) through dual aspect transcendentalism (as in Leibniz, Plotinus, Emerson and Mary Baker Eddy). The physical world is one aspect which is well know. The other aspect is quantum, that is to say mental, and contains the singularity called the self which is inside the singularity called the One. The One perceives all, thinks all, and does all. It is absolute Mind . absolute intelligence and Life. A condensed form of such a theory is given below.
    see my website independent.academia.edu/RogerClough ----- Without governance the stars will fall. ------Without a single governor they will collide.

  • @archaicsage4803
    @archaicsage4803 9 лет назад

    Hmm... Even they are aware of the fact that what they are promoting is also simply a creation myth.

  • @sywaddr11
    @sywaddr11 7 лет назад

    Don't call yourself a physicist to control my life with your "thoughts"……

  • @adhamyodaoud9781
    @adhamyodaoud9781 9 лет назад

    /watch?v=qFGEWcuLA5E i will describe u the unified theory of physics it works with all the known scientific rules

  • @sumanmondal6536
    @sumanmondal6536 5 лет назад

    that lady and max tegmark are absolutely horrible

  • @bobaldo2339
    @bobaldo2339 7 лет назад +1

    When they started talking about "the first cause" and that sort of rot I stopped watching.

  • @obsessedwithguineas
    @obsessedwithguineas 7 лет назад

    Such arrogance. These scientists are great at doing equations. What they do best however is create grandiose rationale or their taison d'etre. Imagine how life on this planet would be thriving without the scientific mind.