This theory makes so much sense! You presented this in a very easy way to follow /pos. Thanks for making us all aware of this theory. Hope to see you make more fnaf content :)
About the arms thing; Removing the arms likely would have been easier than recoloring them. Would be as simple as just selecting the arms in the model editor and deleting them from the model. They really aren't supposed to be seen in-game anyways, so why go out of your way to recolor them when you can simply get rid of them in a click of a button? But, I do like your more Watsonian way of looking at it. Would make a lot of sense in-universe. Well, as much sense as FNaF can possibly make nowadays.
@@eldritch-tailedfeydeer7320 I'm not sure if it started before, but at least since in fnaf 4 scott himself said that every easter egg\ small detail counts, if it's in the game, then it's relevant
I adore the editing style and humor of the video- very well put together:) I'm not convinced that the missing arms mean anything, but the connection to the blood under the table is certainly interesting
ive always wondered since the toys are possessed why do we never see their souls being put to rest as we do with the other children who were killed. its basically never expanded upon unlike the others where we see so much about them and even their names and gravestones. its almost like these other children dont exist in the lore from how little is said about them
While we don't see it, we can assume that their souls would be set free when the animatronics were scrapped, or maybe even later when their plastic shells burnt down in FNAF 3. It is pretty weird that this set of victims matters so little to the lore though, it's kinda crappy storytelling.
8:40 Assuming they do get released. Maybe they were used in Afton's experiments with the Funtimes and remnant, explaining where their remnant came from.
You know the theory about blood is really convincing for me and is an interesting point, the hands though is eh. I think scott just did not include them as they would not be seen anyways just like the propeller. Maybe he removed her arms just so the sprite would render faster, or something like that.
It's completely possible that the original JJ modle was a recoler of an incomplete BB modle, maybe to test other colours or something, and Scott just reused that modle for UCN. An additional thing is that the evidence you used in the video feels like back up evidence rather than the big piece of evidence you presented it as. Overall its not a bad theory, but as you stated in the video, it does feel more like fanfiction.
Very fair. JJ being a test model reused as an easter egg doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility, though it would be kind of weird for him to change some of the colors between FNAF 2 and UCN but maybe that's just me. I feel like my evidence works in the context that this is a theory about one of the most unimportant characters in the series. I feel like her irrelevance kind of limits the evidence about what she is, cuz if it there was something big, then there would be a lot more discussion about JJ. I feel like I made a lot of assumptions in my theory, but I think the core of the theory as the second MCI having 6 victims and that being reflected in the animatronics still stands. Regardless, you make good points and I definitely understand where you're coming from.
I feel like JJ could have been found by Henry during fnaf 6 and used to lure the animatronics near the restaurant, If I remember correctly the ballon boy laugh LURES William afton in the room you want in Fnaf 3, So maybe it could have been the same in Fnaf 6, even if JJ themselves might not have been used, some part of her could have been used possibly, maybe even in the LEFTE design ( If I remember correctly the blueprint says LEFTE and Lefty is the nickname) Edit: Grammar
This isn't a theory I believe in anymore, but I still feel like this argument is kind of flawed, because Balloon Boy is in the same pose as JJ in UCN and yet has his arms posed, so it's odd. Still, I get what you mean
If you turn off perspective and effects on UCN you can see BB's arm and body, and also JJ's body. Scott had to color her body correctly, but for her arms he could just delete them, so he did.
If the Toy Animatronics ARE possessed, I just hope the Mangle spirit was slingshotted by God straight to Hell while the other toy spirits went to Heaven for free lmfao
While completely unrelated to FNaF, seeing armless JJ reminded me of a Warhammer 40k meme/joke: Failbaddon The 'armless. Important bits to understand the joke: Abaddon the Despoiler in the story talks a big game but fails at everything he does. 13 attempts to end the Imperium. 13 times being sent home [until the great retcon] Abaddon's original model was made of metal and had heavy arms. so heavy in fact that if you weren't really careful [or didn't take extra steps when assembling him], his arms would fall off, leaving empty shoulder sockets. 40k is British in origin and many British accents do not pronounce "H" when it is at the start of a word, especially single syllable words.
Okay, so the arms missing may just be Scott prematurely optimizing the game for memory. I am pretty sure the arm being there would be less colors to load into memory. I remember him saying when being interviewed that he did techniques and to make UCN more performant like downsizing the jumpscares and then resizing them. Why didn't he do this for BB? Well perhaps because he may have intended for BB's arm to be semi-visible, I think you even said BB's arm is partially visible.
I guess? Does it really work like that? I know he cut down the jumpscare quality, but even if JJ had arms, it'd be essentially the same size as the image used in the actual game. I'm not super knowledgeable in the stuff Scott used to make the games, but it doesn't seem to me that the arms were removed for that reason. Balloon Boy's arm is visible but it's just a little bit of his hand. You have to be looking all the way to the right and focusing hard to actually notice it. If it was a memory thing, Scott could've taken that arm away as well, since it's extremely difficult to see in the actual game.
Yes, I'm very knowledgable about these kinds of useless technical stuff. Am a developer myself for nearly 10+ years. JJ wouldn't save much on memory, no. But if Scott did microoptimize as his strategy then collectively overtime it really adds up and would save on resources. Clickteam isn't the best engine and has its limitations. Scott had to work past those limitations to make UCN, and one way he did that was optimizing it a ton.
@@veronicamoment Less colors in the color table means less space in memory. It just seems Scott's mindset was cut out the junk I don't need to save on space.
Here's the main things that contribute to image file size. 1. "More pixels = greater image file size." 2. "Metadata is information about the data, rather than the actual data itself." 3. *"More colours = more bits needed = more file storage space required."* 4. "Image file size = resolution * bit depth."
I think that the blood stain under the table was more meant to show that save them takes place before fnaf 2 gameplay as in the gameplay we can only see 1 table in the party room. Also I heard an interesting theory that explains not only JJ but also Shadow Freddy, RXQ, paper plate boy and the endo skeleton that all may appear during the gameplay. The theory states that the easter egg characters are possesed by the Go! Go! Go! kids. If you think about it there is no real need to show the mci in the minigames of fnaf 2 next to pirate cove even tho they died in a completely different room. So what if this isn't the mci? The theory states that Shadow Freddy and rxq are just a part of that set of victims. Some people think that Shadow Freddy and RXQ are connected but that doesn't need to be the case because they don't really look like the same kind of animatronics. Sure they both have glowing teeth and eyes but one is completely pitch black and the other is purple. But it works if they are a part of the Go go go victims because JJ is also a recolor of an already existing animatronic just like the shadows and endo 02 is also based on an already existing model (he is Foxy's endo but with blue eyes). The only exception is the paper plate boy but I would explain him as being the special one in the group. What do I mean by this? The mci and dci also have a special character in their groups, mci has Golden Freddy who is the only recolor in the group and the toys have Balloon Boy who's the only one to not be based on an already existing animatronic unlike the rest. The theory also states that the dci and go go go kids get freed in the happiest day minigame because in the minigame there are 3 rooms. The first 2 rooms have 5 baloons and the last has 6 representing the mci and Charlie. After the souls disappear then the baloons go away. That means the balloons represent the dead kids. It's interesting that both of the previous rooms have exactly 5 balloons. Just like 5 go go go kids and 5 kids from save them.
Someone theorize that jj is just a litteral toy, in fnaf 4 we see toys that maches the design of the toy animatronics, so the theory states that jj is just a recolored toy and was never actually an animatronic, and that jeremy and cassidy just knew about her merch Even tho i think this is all just a coincidence, i like how this theory fells like it come straight 2015, it's simple Also the editing and the humor is good, keep making these
Work on your audio mixing a bit more, the background music overpowers your voice a fair bit. Other than that this was an excellent first speaking video, well done!
The Toys are said to be scrapped at the end of FNAF 2. Their destruction would get rid of their souls. If it somehow didn't, their parts were in the box in FNAF 3, so they would burn anyway.
Ik in the description you claimed to no longer believe this, however you make really good points about the five corpses but 6 blood stains. Never noticed that! Which could point towards them ALL being possessed i doubt the corpes in the fnaf 2 building are the mci or a separate group of kids that end up not haunting anything. Toy freddy also has blood on his mouth, hes either stuffed or the bite of 87 culprit ur welcome 🙃🖤
They didn't get killed after Night 5 though? The call where Phone Guy mentions that the building's under investigation is like Night 2 or 3, and I'm pretty sure that the call about the previous nightguard (which would be William) switching to the day shift was Night 1. These indicate that the events of SAVETHEM happened before the main gameplay of FNAF 2.
Good but there’s just one problem. DCI happened the day before night 6, even tho JJ appears before that. Now I know that they have facial recognition and parts of souls from the MCI victims (until night 6 where they’re possessed by more kids), but then why would JJ hide under the table BEFORE the DCI?
While it is true that the Night 6 call addresses the DCI, I'm pretty sure earlier nights mention the building being under investigation. I believe it was under investigation because of the DCI, which the company tried to sweep under the rug. Still, pretty good point.
The real twist to JJ is that she is a 6th new haunted animatronic, when we only see 5 bodies and 5 spirits. Thats because the 5 new spirits inhabit toy freddy, chica, bonnie, bb, and jj. What about Mangle? Its backstory, being around since pre-1983, means its NOT a new soul like the other 5 toy animatronics. The toys are brand new, so could only be possessed by the mci2 kids. Mangle being around since pre-1983 means it was more likely possessed in mci1. And since only 4 kids went missing in mci1, I'm led to believe Mangle is Susie's dog afterall. Whether I like a theory has no bearing on its canonicity. This is the only way Mangle/JJ make any sense.
No, Mangle was not around pre-1983. If you're talking about the toy in the girl's room in the FNAF 4 minigame house, that's a toy, there is no way the owner of the room would just have Mangle lying around the house. If it's about Funtime Foxy from Sister Location, those are straight up not the same animatronic. And since when did only 4 children go missing in the MCI? It was never really stated that it was only 4 and everything points to Golden Freddy being possessed by an MCI kid. Mangle being possessed by Susie's dog is an extremely flawed theory that I cannot get behind.
@@veronicamoment Yeah, the Mangle in the little girl's room is a toy. But it is Mangle. Even if you subscribe to the theory that the Toy Animatronics were based off of the merch toys which came first, the backstory of Mangle means it had to be an animatronic before it could be a toy. It only got the name Mangle from the animatronic Funtime Foxy being taken apart over and over and the staff getting tired of putting it back together. So that's where Mangle got its name, and where Fazbear Ent got the idea for the character Mangle. Then they made the toy, which we see in the little girl's room in 1983.
@@veronicamoment And Golden Freddy was clearly killed in the Save Him minigame, separate from the other four. Thats why we see four bodies in the give gifts give life. Supposedly we see a 5th body for 1 frame before the G Fred jumpscare, which the puppet never gives a present or a mascot head to, which to me further emphasizes that he is separate from the other four, but that he was already there when they were killed. I don't think scott would show us the same kid being killed in save him and the puppet minigame. The puppet minigame shows charlottes death and save him shows Cassidy's.
@@BOBimusRex If Mangle is an actual animatronic in FNAF 4, how come there are other toys of the toy animatronics that aren't? Why does one have to be different from the rest in that regard? There is no canon backstory as to how Fazbear Entertainment came up with Funtime Foxy as a character, and the explanation given by Phone Guy in FNAF 2 would imply it was in the location the game takes place in and not in like 1983. And acting like Save Him represents anything other than Charlie's death is an outrageously bold claim. You mean to tell me that these two different characters both were locked outside the location until William Afton pulled over in his car and killed them, on two completely seperate occasions, but with the exact same details. Not only that, but Save Him ends with a Puppet jumpscare, that minigame is connected to The Puppet. And that's ignoring the fact that when Henry talks to his daughter, who is The Puppet inside Lefty, when he talks about when she was "shut out and left to die", it LITERALLY shows a picture of Save Him. This CONFIRMS Save Him represents Charlie's death. Scott's retconned multiple things over the franchise's history, and Charlie's gender is one of them. You cannot make a case for Save Him being anything other than Charlie's death.
@@veronicamoment You don't have to agree with me about G Fred, that end of the canon has been retconned into swiss cheese. I get it. But like I said, either Mangle is a plot hole or a huge clue as to the sequence of events. Id be fine with saying its appearance i 4 is just a plot hole. Somethi g that would would need to be cbanged for canonicity. But if we're saying it IS canon, that means a whole lot. Given the origin provided in 2 and the appearance (even in toy form) in 1983, means the toy's namesake- the actual animatronic Mangle- existed in 1983. There are 5 dead kids in MC2. No one is debating that one. But we see 6 new animatronics following MCI2. Toy Fred, Bon, Chic, BB, JJ, and Mangle. So someone was inhabited before MCI2, and the only one who existed pre-MCI2 was Mangle, as evidenced by the toy in the girls room in 1983. So all the MCI2 souls are accounted for, but Mangle had to be possessed before the 87 location opened. But the MCI1 kids are all acounted for too. So Mangle is either possessed by some soul not murdered in either MCI, which would be fine I guess. Just some other nameless kid. OR, I'm just sayin', it COULD be Susie's doge. The timing fits. I've never been a fan of the Mangle is an actual doge theory, but it does seem to work.
I personally don’t think they have souls my theory is that the kids that were dead were moved to the prize counter and were stuffed inside the music box and there souls were in the plushies(it’s a joke)
A bit of a stretch. I don't think any game before fnaf 3 should be referenced because so much has changed in the story. 1. This would've worked if we didn't already know that mangle was possessed by suzie's dog. 2. This theory wouldn't work because of what we know about remnant now.
Saying it like that makes it feel like every game before FNAF 3 is completely useless, when we know that's not the case. By that logic, a lot of the fundamental lore of this franchise is just kind of lost. Mangle is NOT possessed by Susie's dog. Mangle was made for the 1987 location and it does not make sense for it to be possessed by a dead dog from 1985. Not to mention that the evidence for that theory comes from the SAVETHEM minigame from FNAF 2. What happened to not referencing any game before FNAF 3? I also kind of fail to see how what we know about remnant contradicts this, so please do explain.
The entire point of the video is to make a connection between a group of victims and the Toy animatronics. The point of the video is in the title, and you are choosing to ignore that, along with how you must be ignoring how these "soulless" animatronics crawl into vents, remove parts of their body and crawl up walls and ceilings. A mere security measure is not gonna make high-tech Chuck E Cheese rejects do that, buddy. The Puppet was around LONG before the Toys. For the Puppet to give life to the Missing Children Incident victims, the Puppet would have to exist and be possessed at LEAST before said incident, which is estimated to take place in 1985, and most definitely does not take place in 1987, the year the Toys are introduced. The Puppet's only a Toy animatronic in the sense it was being used in the 1987 location with the Toy animatronics. Both in the lore and in their internal mechanisms (and design even), they are very VERY different and unrelated.
My wuestion is it the five fnaf 2 kids toy bonnie chica freddy balloon boy and mangle and jj as an easter egg Or toy freddy chica bonnie balloon boy and jj and mangle is a dog theory is correct abd is chicas dog
Mangle being Chica's dog is an extremely flawed theory so I'm not taking it into account. It makes no sense for a dog that died in 1985 to possess an animatronic created in 1987. It's the five FNAF 2 kids you can see in the minigame and a secret sixth kid under the table for JJ.
My theory on JJ is that she’s just a generic animatronic with no spirits inside her, that’s why she doesn’t attack the Fnaf2 protagonist when all the other Toys do
No, because this is the second missing children's incident, in 1987. Golden Freddy has been theorized to be possessed by two spirits, and those would be the Bite Victim from 1983 and Cassidy from the original Missing Children's Incident from some time before 1987 (heavily implied to be 1985). Golden Freddy can't be the 6th child of the second incident because the options that could have possessed him died before this.
@@veronicamoment Hmm... I always assumed there was only 6 children Afton killed. But maybe there's more? I'm pretty sure the animatronics are programmed to detect a predator which is why they were acting weird. It seemed someone tampered with their detection software which caused them to be aggressive towards ALL adults. I wasn't too keen that he killed more then five because otherwise it would be mentioned. Then again, happiest day includes mangle, bb, toy chica, and we know puppet is possessed. But toy freddy and bonnie are never seen to have signifigance
@@TrifectShow From what I know, and it's what the theory uses as a base, there are essentially 3 big Afton killing moments: Charlie's death, the Missing Children Incident and the Second Missing/Dead Children Incident. Charlie's murder is believed to have ocurred in 1983, or at least some time before the Missing Children Incident, which in itself has to take some time before 1987, as the animatronics from an older location appear there. We know that Charlie has to die before the MCI because she's the one to give them life as The Puppet. The event depicted in SAVETHEM is a different thing from the MCI, as it shows that the Withered animatronics are in their state from the actual game's events. This places the minigame in 1987, either before or during the events of FNAF2. Because the animatronics from the old location are in the 1987 location and the Toy animatronics have already been implemented, we know this can't be the Missing Children's Incident, as that happened before all this. One could even say that the whole point of the Toys was to prevent things like the MCI from happening again (facial recognition and stuff). Due to all the information and clues pointing towards SAVETHEM not depicting the MCI, we can conclude that the dead children in this minigame aren't any of William Afton's previous victims. This is the information that is necessary to really understand this theory, as it focuses heavily on this Second Missing Children incident.
Yeah, that definitely just feels like some fanfiction. I still don't feel like the Toys were ever possessed. I can't tell I know the exact rules of the universe with the remnant and stuff, but the theory never worked out for me. Puppet is already possessed by Charlie, Mangle could possibly have a soul inside of her already, and we don't even have concrete evidence on whether JJ is real or not. So there's literally not enough 'space' for the kids at FNAF 2's restaurant. JJ is overall an overlooked character in the franchise. Scott probably didn't even have the model properly saved for all the major differences JJ has received between 2 and UCN (she used to have pink cheeks in FNAF 2 but in UCN it's blue for whatever reason). So Scott himself probably didn't even give any attention to her, so don't look too deep into it her game sprites (unless they make it out to be a big plot point in the future like it happened with the 'Odor' joke). Still a decent watch, you should continue making these videos.
I personally think it makes sense for the Toys to be possessed, especially due to their behavior during FNAF 2. Even if they have their high-tech security measures, I doubt that non-possessed animatronics would be crawling through vents and do stuff like removing their eyes and beak. It also kind of gives the dead children from SAVETHEM something to do, since they're very much not the same as the MCI kids. To me, connecting JJ and the Toys to SAVETHEM is another piece of evidence as to why they're possessed.
She pops up under your desk on rare occasions and she is barely seen outside of fnaf 2 unlike golden Freddy who has multiple appearances and Easter eggs across the series so no it’s not unreasonable to assume she isn’t real. Not to mention that just because a character appears in UCN doesn’t automatically mean they are cannon (nightmare balloon boy, nightmare mangle etc) there is a difference between something being cannon and something being there just because fnaf is an IRL video game series and the “game” part of every fnaf game is just as important as the story itself, some things may overlap one another I personally believe the withered animatronics are possessed because of the simple reason William Afton stuffs his victims into the animatronic suits and I don't know about you but I don’t think a child and fit inside balloon boy or JJ.
@@djkalla2973 Let's go over these points one by one. 1. Being an easter egg who appears very rarely does not necessarily mean that the character isn't real. Sure, it doesn't confirm she exists, but saying that she can't be a real character because of that is very close-minded. Or do you mean to tell me that Shadow Freddy doesn't exist in FNAF's lore? Or Yenndo, despite the fact he appeared in Help Wanted 2? 2. Ultimate Custom Night is most likely canon to FNAF's lore for a multitude of reasons. JJ is in the game, which makes her canon to some extent. Even if she's not a physical animatronic, she was something that both the FNAF 2 guards and William Afton saw. If UCN is canon, you can't pick and choose what parts of it are canon or not. If the game is canon and later games don't contradict what it presents, then those things are canon. Also, Nightmare Balloon Boy specifically was stated to be canon by Scott Cawthon sometime after FNAF 4's Halloween Update. 3. You can include things for FNAF as a game while also being part of the story. Golden Freddy, the posters of the kids crying, the newspaper, all of these easter eggs in FNAF 1 are there mainly to be easter eggs to give players something interesting to look at or be spooked by while also serving as hints and pieces of the game's hidden story. JJ's inclusion in the games can be both for cosmetic/gameplay and story reasons. They are not mutually exclusive. 4. While it is true that the original group that later became the Withereds had the kids stuffed into them, that is not the only way that souls can possess an animatronic. FNAF 6 shows us how Charlie possessed the Puppet, and it simply layed down beside the body and that was enough for her to possess it. Who's to say that the souls of the kids in SAVETHEM couldn't have possessed the Toys in a similar manner. I know my theory's not the most solid one in the world, but at least try to use arguments that work.
@@veronicamoment I just don't think it makes sense why Afton would leave the victims lying on the floor out in the open and to counter argue your point of possession not having to be caused by stuffing I think the reason he didn't do it with Charlotte is because that was the first person he killed before going off the hook and killed everyone else. My point of her being an easter egg isn't to prove shes non cannon but it sure as hell doesn't help her situation it's also about her lack of appearances only 3 game appearances and 1 of them not even being cannon, pretty much every other easter egg character has appeared more than 1 time after their debut (Shadow Bonnie for example appears in, FNAF 2, FNAF 3, FNAF world, UCN, and FNAF AR). About your point of her not having arms in UCN, we know scott does not like reusing models in his games and your not meant to see her arms anyways and the reason Balloon boy has his arms is because you can actually see one in the vent and i can imagine modeling the entire arm would be easier than just making his hand nub.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
WOW thank you so much for mentioning me in the video. and thank you for liking my theory XD
Glad someone else noticed the six blood spots in Save Them.
JJ was the victim under the Party Room table? It's an interesting idea.
Yup
This theory makes so much sense! You presented this in a very easy way to follow /pos. Thanks for making us all aware of this theory. Hope to see you make more fnaf content :)
Actually,this isn’t theory. This is reality
five nights at freddy
Is this where you want to be
I just don't get it.
@@kirbyfan5966I was thinking the same thing. LOL
@@prestonrush8014 why do you want to stay
@@kirbyfan5966 Five Nights At Freddy's!!!!
About the arms thing; Removing the arms likely would have been easier than recoloring them. Would be as simple as just selecting the arms in the model editor and deleting them from the model. They really aren't supposed to be seen in-game anyways, so why go out of your way to recolor them when you can simply get rid of them in a click of a button? But, I do like your more Watsonian way of looking at it. Would make a lot of sense in-universe. Well, as much sense as FNaF can possibly make nowadays.
Very good point, actually.
her belly is colored like her hat tho, even tho it never appears
@@laxmiinaxizaby2206 That... is a good point. Maybe Scott just got lazy? idk
@@eldritch-tailedfeydeer7320 I'm not sure if it started before, but at least since in fnaf 4 scott himself said that every easter egg\ small detail counts, if it's in the game, then it's relevant
I adore the editing style and humor of the video- very well put together:)
I'm not convinced that the missing arms mean anything, but the connection to the blood under the table is certainly interesting
ive always wondered since the toys are possessed why do we never see their souls being put to rest as we do with the other children who were killed. its basically never expanded upon unlike the others where we see so much about them and even their names and gravestones. its almost like these other children dont exist in the lore from how little is said about them
While we don't see it, we can assume that their souls would be set free when the animatronics were scrapped, or maybe even later when their plastic shells burnt down in FNAF 3. It is pretty weird that this set of victims matters so little to the lore though, it's kinda crappy storytelling.
In the end of FNAF 2, A Newspaper says The Toys get scrapped to bring The OGs back to the show.
So some of them already rest after that
Could be the mini games in FNAF 3, which does somewhat tie in with the box of toy animatronic parts
Which could be the aftermath of yes, them being scrapped in the end of FNAF 2. But that's just a theory
Awesome video! I'm not too knowledgable on FNAF lore but this makes a lot of sense. Great job.
8:40 Assuming they do get released. Maybe they were used in Afton's experiments with the Funtimes and remnant, explaining where their remnant came from.
This is actually a banger video,, girl really said no arms
"Did you get the UCN spot?"
"Yes."
"What did it cost?"
"My arms."
I like your theories. If the audio was a little lower it would be 10/10.
You know the theory about blood is really convincing for me and is an interesting point, the hands though is eh. I think scott just did not include them as they would not be seen anyways just like the propeller.
Maybe he removed her arms just so the sprite would render faster, or something like that.
It's completely possible that the original JJ modle was a recoler of an incomplete BB modle, maybe to test other colours or something, and Scott just reused that modle for UCN. An additional thing is that the evidence you used in the video feels like back up evidence rather than the big piece of evidence you presented it as. Overall its not a bad theory, but as you stated in the video, it does feel more like fanfiction.
Very fair. JJ being a test model reused as an easter egg doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility, though it would be kind of weird for him to change some of the colors between FNAF 2 and UCN but maybe that's just me.
I feel like my evidence works in the context that this is a theory about one of the most unimportant characters in the series. I feel like her irrelevance kind of limits the evidence about what she is, cuz if it there was something big, then there would be a lot more discussion about JJ.
I feel like I made a lot of assumptions in my theory, but I think the core of the theory as the second MCI having 6 victims and that being reflected in the animatronics still stands.
Regardless, you make good points and I definitely understand where you're coming from.
The toys are obviously possessed. The important discussion is if they are possessed by the Save Them children or not. Good video.
6:00 BALLOON BOY'S FNF SONG LMAO
You go girl, your voice is really pleasing
Please include a list of music in order of appearance!! U had some banger tunes, I'd love to find the original songs to enjoy too :)
^^^^ I know the song in the arm part is an FNF mod, idk which one though
Never caught this before, nice video!
I'm not a minute in and the editing alone made me subscribe
The whole video was awesome. A real good piece of the puzzle
i feel like if jj was armless then fnaf world would have depicted her like that
I feel like JJ could have been found by Henry during fnaf 6 and used to lure the animatronics near the restaurant, If I remember correctly the ballon boy laugh LURES William afton in the room you want in Fnaf 3, So maybe it could have been the same in Fnaf 6, even if JJ themselves might not have been used, some part of her could have been used possibly, maybe even in the LEFTE design ( If I remember correctly the blueprint says LEFTE and Lefty is the nickname)
Edit: Grammar
While I do find it more likely that JJ just got scrapped along with the other Toys, I do really like the idea of her being in FNAF 6 in some way.
rasc exists
The reason JJ's arms are missing is because they aren't needed lol, it's quicker to delete them instead of posing them out of frame.
This isn't a theory I believe in anymore, but I still feel like this argument is kind of flawed, because Balloon Boy is in the same pose as JJ in UCN and yet has his arms posed, so it's odd. Still, I get what you mean
JJ hides under a table and im like thats so real of u
Yooo I've never noticed the blood under the table
Interesting how the blood under the table was from JJ yet she seems to be repeating that behaviour continuously as JJ 🤔
finally a video about jalloon joy!
Imagine you and your mates get killed in a fazbear location and your mates possess the killer robots and you get stuck with bloody balloon boy☠
so fucking true
Just laugh and hide the pain
If you turn off perspective and effects on UCN you can see BB's arm and body, and also JJ's body. Scott had to color her body correctly, but for her arms he could just delete them, so he did.
Nice theory,loved the video! Hope to see more video like this!
Awesome video
If the Toy Animatronics ARE possessed, I just hope the Mangle spirit was slingshotted by God straight to Hell while the other toy spirits went to Heaven for free
lmfao
Jesus Christ what did Mangle do to you
Meanwhile, I just made something where the child possessing Toy Bonnie hid under a table. Weird coincidence.
I don't know why a body under the table just seems really creepy
I love this perspective!
This man is very underrated he's a funny RUclipsr.
Thanks, but my pronouns are she/her
@@veronicamoment Oh ok then
Maybe scott was very lazy to JJ model,like example Reconstructed Mangle/Toy Foxy On FNAF 2 next to music box Does not have arms or bowtie
I’m assuming those “Parts” from JJ were used for Balloon Boy.
Didn't have to be for him specifically, but he's probably the most likely candidate for receiving parts from JJ.
@@veronicamoment
And if we consider Agony, I’m thinking this is why BB moves around at night. Because some parts of JJ were Infected with remnant.
Your writing is hilarious!
JJ has always been an enigma to me, so this video caught my eye.
While completely unrelated to FNaF, seeing armless JJ reminded me of a Warhammer 40k meme/joke: Failbaddon The 'armless.
Important bits to understand the joke:
Abaddon the Despoiler in the story talks a big game but fails at everything he does. 13 attempts to end the Imperium. 13 times being sent home [until the great retcon]
Abaddon's original model was made of metal and had heavy arms. so heavy in fact that if you weren't really careful [or didn't take extra steps when assembling him], his arms would fall off, leaving empty shoulder sockets.
40k is British in origin and many British accents do not pronounce "H" when it is at the start of a word, especially single syllable words.
This is a good explanation
Okay, so the arms missing may just be Scott prematurely optimizing the game for memory.
I am pretty sure the arm being there would be less colors to load into memory.
I remember him saying when being interviewed that he did techniques and to make UCN more performant like downsizing the jumpscares and then resizing them.
Why didn't he do this for BB?
Well perhaps because he may have intended for BB's arm to be semi-visible, I think you even said BB's arm is partially visible.
I guess? Does it really work like that? I know he cut down the jumpscare quality, but even if JJ had arms, it'd be essentially the same size as the image used in the actual game. I'm not super knowledgeable in the stuff Scott used to make the games, but it doesn't seem to me that the arms were removed for that reason.
Balloon Boy's arm is visible but it's just a little bit of his hand. You have to be looking all the way to the right and focusing hard to actually notice it. If it was a memory thing, Scott could've taken that arm away as well, since it's extremely difficult to see in the actual game.
Yes, I'm very knowledgable about these kinds of useless technical stuff.
Am a developer myself for nearly 10+ years.
JJ wouldn't save much on memory, no.
But if Scott did microoptimize as his strategy then collectively overtime it really adds up and would save on resources.
Clickteam isn't the best engine and has its limitations. Scott had to work past those limitations to make UCN, and one way he did that was optimizing it a ton.
@@TrifectShow I see.
@@veronicamoment Less colors in the color table means less space in memory.
It just seems Scott's mindset was cut out the junk I don't need to save on space.
Here's the main things that contribute to image file size.
1. "More pixels = greater image file size."
2. "Metadata is information about the data, rather than the actual data itself."
3. *"More colours = more bits needed = more file storage space required."*
4. "Image file size = resolution * bit depth."
good theory
This video is great
I think that the blood stain under the table was more meant to show that save them takes place before fnaf 2 gameplay as in the gameplay we can only see 1 table in the party room. Also I heard an interesting theory that explains not only JJ but also Shadow Freddy, RXQ, paper plate boy and the endo skeleton that all may appear during the gameplay. The theory states that the easter egg characters are possesed by the Go! Go! Go! kids. If you think about it there is no real need to show the mci in the minigames of fnaf 2 next to pirate cove even tho they died in a completely different room. So what if this isn't the mci? The theory states that Shadow Freddy and rxq are just a part of that set of victims. Some people think that Shadow Freddy and RXQ are connected but that doesn't need to be the case because they don't really look like the same kind of animatronics. Sure they both have glowing teeth and eyes but one is completely pitch black and the other is purple. But it works if they are a part of the Go go go victims because JJ is also a recolor of an already existing animatronic just like the shadows and endo 02 is also based on an already existing model (he is Foxy's endo but with blue eyes). The only exception is the paper plate boy but I would explain him as being the special one in the group. What do I mean by this? The mci and dci also have a special character in their groups, mci has Golden Freddy who is the only recolor in the group and the toys have Balloon Boy who's the only one to not be based on an already existing animatronic unlike the rest. The theory also states that the dci and go go go kids get freed in the happiest day minigame because in the minigame there are 3 rooms. The first 2 rooms have 5 baloons and the last has 6 representing the mci and Charlie. After the souls disappear then the baloons go away. That means the balloons represent the dead kids. It's interesting that both of the previous rooms have exactly 5 balloons. Just like 5 go go go kids and 5 kids from save them.
I completely agree!
good video
my only problem is that the music volume is too loud compared to your voice
I like the theory a lot ^^
Someone theorize that jj is just a litteral toy, in fnaf 4 we see toys that maches the design of the toy animatronics, so the theory states that jj is just a recolored toy and was never actually an animatronic, and that jeremy and cassidy just knew about her merch
Even tho i think this is all just a coincidence, i like how this theory fells like it come straight 2015, it's simple
Also the editing and the humor is good, keep making these
JJ is a GF analogue?
Yeah, like an extremely useless Golden Freddy
Making batshit insane theories since 2014. God i love/hate this community.
HOLY SMOKES THIS IS GENIUS WOW THIS IS GOOOOOOODD
Nice theory! Very interesting
I always believed the Toys were possessed but forgot about JJ, this makes a lot of sense
I believe the 6th blood spot belongs to JJ
Work on your audio mixing a bit more, the background music overpowers your voice a fair bit. Other than that this was an excellent first speaking video, well done!
hasnt posted in a while since this video dang we lost another fnaf youtuber
this is a good video
I have a small question how would their souls get released since they weren’t in the fnaf six fire
The Toys are said to be scrapped at the end of FNAF 2. Their destruction would get rid of their souls. If it somehow didn't, their parts were in the box in FNAF 3, so they would burn anyway.
@@veronicamoment okay thank you
Awesome vid
Great video! I think the audio is a little bit too loud in comparison to your voice.
So what's the FNF song in the background?
Helium from Vs. FNAF 2
@@veronicamoment Oh that makes sense actually.
Ik in the description you claimed to no longer believe this, however you make really good points about the five corpses but 6 blood stains. Never noticed that!
Which could point towards them ALL being possessed i doubt the corpes in the fnaf 2 building are the mci or a separate group of kids that end up not haunting anything. Toy freddy also has blood on his mouth, hes either stuffed or the bite of 87 culprit ur welcome 🙃🖤
Micheal afton vs mike schmidt
Evan afton vs garrett schmidt
Elizabeth afton vs abby schmidt
Goodness me my brain has exploded with thoughts of evidence that makes sense
five Night’s at freddy
2:00 hey thats me
I have a question
How are they possessed if the kids only get killed AFTER night 5
They didn't get killed after Night 5 though? The call where Phone Guy mentions that the building's under investigation is like Night 2 or 3, and I'm pretty sure that the call about the previous nightguard (which would be William) switching to the day shift was Night 1. These indicate that the events of SAVETHEM happened before the main gameplay of FNAF 2.
Remember those calls were pre recorded as well, so the murders could’ve taken place before the game play.
Good but there’s just one problem. DCI happened the day before night 6, even tho JJ appears before that. Now I know that they have facial recognition and parts of souls from the MCI victims (until night 6 where they’re possessed by more kids), but then why would JJ hide under the table BEFORE the DCI?
While it is true that the Night 6 call addresses the DCI, I'm pretty sure earlier nights mention the building being under investigation. I believe it was under investigation because of the DCI, which the company tried to sweep under the rug.
Still, pretty good point.
They don’t have parts of the og gang, the phone guy says The plan was to use their parts, so…
Interesting observation. Even though I think it has no significance to the lore whatsoever.
This is pretty crazy.
Welcome to FNAF
This guy is good
*girl
The real twist to JJ is that she is a 6th new haunted animatronic, when we only see 5 bodies and 5 spirits. Thats because the 5 new spirits inhabit toy freddy, chica, bonnie, bb, and jj. What about Mangle? Its backstory, being around since pre-1983, means its NOT a new soul like the other 5 toy animatronics. The toys are brand new, so could only be possessed by the mci2 kids. Mangle being around since pre-1983 means it was more likely possessed in mci1. And since only 4 kids went missing in mci1, I'm led to believe Mangle is Susie's dog afterall. Whether I like a theory has no bearing on its canonicity. This is the only way Mangle/JJ make any sense.
No, Mangle was not around pre-1983. If you're talking about the toy in the girl's room in the FNAF 4 minigame house, that's a toy, there is no way the owner of the room would just have Mangle lying around the house. If it's about Funtime Foxy from Sister Location, those are straight up not the same animatronic.
And since when did only 4 children go missing in the MCI? It was never really stated that it was only 4 and everything points to Golden Freddy being possessed by an MCI kid.
Mangle being possessed by Susie's dog is an extremely flawed theory that I cannot get behind.
@@veronicamoment Yeah, the Mangle in the little girl's room is a toy. But it is Mangle. Even if you subscribe to the theory that the Toy Animatronics were based off of the merch toys which came first, the backstory of Mangle means it had to be an animatronic before it could be a toy. It only got the name Mangle from the animatronic Funtime Foxy being taken apart over and over and the staff getting tired of putting it back together. So that's where Mangle got its name, and where Fazbear Ent got the idea for the character Mangle. Then they made the toy, which we see in the little girl's room in 1983.
@@veronicamoment And Golden Freddy was clearly killed in the Save Him minigame, separate from the other four. Thats why we see four bodies in the give gifts give life. Supposedly we see a 5th body for 1 frame before the G Fred jumpscare, which the puppet never gives a present or a mascot head to, which to me further emphasizes that he is separate from the other four, but that he was already there when they were killed. I don't think scott would show us the same kid being killed in save him and the puppet minigame. The puppet minigame shows charlottes death and save him shows Cassidy's.
@@BOBimusRex If Mangle is an actual animatronic in FNAF 4, how come there are other toys of the toy animatronics that aren't? Why does one have to be different from the rest in that regard?
There is no canon backstory as to how Fazbear Entertainment came up with Funtime Foxy as a character, and the explanation given by Phone Guy in FNAF 2 would imply it was in the location the game takes place in and not in like 1983.
And acting like Save Him represents anything other than Charlie's death is an outrageously bold claim. You mean to tell me that these two different characters both were locked outside the location until William Afton pulled over in his car and killed them, on two completely seperate occasions, but with the exact same details. Not only that, but Save Him ends with a Puppet jumpscare, that minigame is connected to The Puppet.
And that's ignoring the fact that when Henry talks to his daughter, who is The Puppet inside Lefty, when he talks about when she was "shut out and left to die", it LITERALLY shows a picture of Save Him. This CONFIRMS Save Him represents Charlie's death. Scott's retconned multiple things over the franchise's history, and Charlie's gender is one of them. You cannot make a case for Save Him being anything other than Charlie's death.
@@veronicamoment You don't have to agree with me about G Fred, that end of the canon has been retconned into swiss cheese. I get it. But like I said, either Mangle is a plot hole or a huge clue as to the sequence of events. Id be fine with saying its appearance i 4 is just a plot hole. Somethi g that would would need to be cbanged for canonicity. But if we're saying it IS canon, that means a whole lot.
Given the origin provided in 2 and the appearance (even in toy form) in 1983, means the toy's namesake- the actual animatronic Mangle- existed in 1983. There are 5 dead kids in MC2. No one is debating that one. But we see 6 new animatronics following MCI2. Toy Fred, Bon, Chic, BB, JJ, and Mangle. So someone was inhabited before MCI2, and the only one who existed pre-MCI2 was Mangle, as evidenced by the toy in the girls room in 1983. So all the MCI2 souls are accounted for, but Mangle had to be possessed before the 87 location opened. But the MCI1 kids are all acounted for too. So Mangle is either possessed by some soul not murdered in either MCI, which would be fine I guess. Just some other nameless kid. OR, I'm just sayin', it COULD be Susie's doge. The timing fits. I've never been a fan of the Mangle is an actual doge theory, but it does seem to work.
Cool
I personally don’t think they have souls my theory is that the kids that were dead were moved to the prize counter and were stuffed inside the music box and there souls were in the plushies(it’s a joke)
Pls say that u say is a irony
A bit of a stretch. I don't think any game before fnaf 3 should be referenced because so much has changed in the story.
1. This would've worked if we didn't already know that mangle was possessed by suzie's dog.
2. This theory wouldn't work because of what we know about remnant now.
Saying it like that makes it feel like every game before FNAF 3 is completely useless, when we know that's not the case. By that logic, a lot of the fundamental lore of this franchise is just kind of lost.
Mangle is NOT possessed by Susie's dog. Mangle was made for the 1987 location and it does not make sense for it to be possessed by a dead dog from 1985. Not to mention that the evidence for that theory comes from the SAVETHEM minigame from FNAF 2. What happened to not referencing any game before FNAF 3?
I also kind of fail to see how what we know about remnant contradicts this, so please do explain.
I still don't believe the fnaf 2 characters are possessed.
4:45 this whole part is incorrect, the toy animatronics don’t have souls in them, but even if they did, why didn’t you count Puppet, their a toy
The entire point of the video is to make a connection between a group of victims and the Toy animatronics. The point of the video is in the title, and you are choosing to ignore that, along with how you must be ignoring how these "soulless" animatronics crawl into vents, remove parts of their body and crawl up walls and ceilings. A mere security measure is not gonna make high-tech Chuck E Cheese rejects do that, buddy.
The Puppet was around LONG before the Toys. For the Puppet to give life to the Missing Children Incident victims, the Puppet would have to exist and be possessed at LEAST before said incident, which is estimated to take place in 1985, and most definitely does not take place in 1987, the year the Toys are introduced. The Puppet's only a Toy animatronic in the sense it was being used in the 1987 location with the Toy animatronics. Both in the lore and in their internal mechanisms (and design even), they are very VERY different and unrelated.
Firstly, they do have sould.
Secondly, Puppet isn't a toy becouse he was created long before the toys.
Yes they literally do, the Save Them Minigame alone literally show that, it’s possible to possess an Animatronic and be outside their Suit.
Interesting
Mega based.
My wuestion is it the five fnaf 2 kids toy bonnie chica freddy balloon boy and mangle and jj as an easter egg
Or toy freddy chica bonnie balloon boy and jj and mangle is a dog theory is correct abd is chicas dog
Mangle being Chica's dog is an extremely flawed theory so I'm not taking it into account. It makes no sense for a dog that died in 1985 to possess an animatronic created in 1987. It's the five FNAF 2 kids you can see in the minigame and a secret sixth kid under the table for JJ.
Yess, a great video. It's great to see more trans women on the scene
Five night at freddy
My theory on JJ is that she’s just a generic animatronic with no spirits inside her, that’s why she doesn’t attack the Fnaf2 protagonist when all the other Toys do
Hello
f naf
Zack rat have found it’s host
Oh godammit
@@veronicamoment zack rat have found it’s host
Wouldn't Golden Freddy be the six child?
No, because this is the second missing children's incident, in 1987. Golden Freddy has been theorized to be possessed by two spirits, and those would be the Bite Victim from 1983 and Cassidy from the original Missing Children's Incident from some time before 1987 (heavily implied to be 1985).
Golden Freddy can't be the 6th child of the second incident because the options that could have possessed him died before this.
@@veronicamoment Hmm... I always assumed there was only 6 children Afton killed.
But maybe there's more?
I'm pretty sure the animatronics are programmed to detect a predator which is why they were acting weird.
It seemed someone tampered with their detection software which caused them to be aggressive towards ALL adults.
I wasn't too keen that he killed more then five because otherwise it would be mentioned. Then again, happiest day includes mangle, bb, toy chica, and we know puppet is possessed.
But toy freddy and bonnie are never seen to have signifigance
@@TrifectShow From what I know, and it's what the theory uses as a base, there are essentially 3 big Afton killing moments: Charlie's death, the Missing Children Incident and the Second Missing/Dead Children Incident.
Charlie's murder is believed to have ocurred in 1983, or at least some time before the Missing Children Incident, which in itself has to take some time before 1987, as the animatronics from an older location appear there. We know that Charlie has to die before the MCI because she's the one to give them life as The Puppet.
The event depicted in SAVETHEM is a different thing from the MCI, as it shows that the Withered animatronics are in their state from the actual game's events. This places the minigame in 1987, either before or during the events of FNAF2. Because the animatronics from the old location are in the 1987 location and the Toy animatronics have already been implemented, we know this can't be the Missing Children's Incident, as that happened before all this. One could even say that the whole point of the Toys was to prevent things like the MCI from happening again (facial recognition and stuff).
Due to all the information and clues pointing towards SAVETHEM not depicting the MCI, we can conclude that the dead children in this minigame aren't any of William Afton's previous victims.
This is the information that is necessary to really understand this theory, as it focuses heavily on this Second Missing Children incident.
@@veronicamoment I think I understand the theory. Thanks for clarifying! :)
@@veronicamoment actually because it says grand reopening on the news paper before you get in the office
Great theory, bro.
This won't stop me from obtaining Toy Chica's thicc thighs
The computer screen will ❤
@@veronicamoment
_"All characters in this image are depicted to be at least 18 years of age."_
Checkmate.
Yeah, that definitely just feels like some fanfiction.
I still don't feel like the Toys were ever possessed. I can't tell I know the exact rules of the universe with the remnant and stuff, but the theory never worked out for me. Puppet is already possessed by Charlie, Mangle could possibly have a soul inside of her already, and we don't even have concrete evidence on whether JJ is real or not. So there's literally not enough 'space' for the kids at FNAF 2's restaurant.
JJ is overall an overlooked character in the franchise. Scott probably didn't even have the model properly saved for all the major differences JJ has received between 2 and UCN (she used to have pink cheeks in FNAF 2 but in UCN it's blue for whatever reason). So Scott himself probably didn't even give any attention to her, so don't look too deep into it her game sprites (unless they make it out to be a big plot point in the future like it happened with the 'Odor' joke).
Still a decent watch, you should continue making these videos.
I personally think it makes sense for the Toys to be possessed, especially due to their behavior during FNAF 2. Even if they have their high-tech security measures, I doubt that non-possessed animatronics would be crawling through vents and do stuff like removing their eyes and beak. It also kind of gives the dead children from SAVETHEM something to do, since they're very much not the same as the MCI kids.
To me, connecting JJ and the Toys to SAVETHEM is another piece of evidence as to why they're possessed.
It's simply the face recognition system being tampered with.
@@OleksiyAntonkin Feels weird that making it so that they recognize any adult as a criminal would also make them go into vents.
I can't see how being possessed or not would have an effect on the character's method of making their way towards you.
@@OleksiyAntonkin Because the Toys probably shouldn't be programmed to crawl through vents. Is that normal animatronic behavior to you?
But JJ isn't real.....
There is no actual proof that she isn't real. It would not be unreasonable to assume she is.
She pops up under your desk on rare occasions and she is barely seen outside of fnaf 2 unlike golden Freddy who has multiple appearances and Easter eggs across the series so no it’s not unreasonable to assume she isn’t real. Not to mention that just because a character appears in UCN doesn’t automatically mean they are cannon (nightmare balloon boy, nightmare mangle etc) there is a difference between something being cannon and something being there just because fnaf is an IRL video game series and the “game” part of every fnaf game is just as important as the story itself, some things may overlap one another I personally believe the withered animatronics are possessed because of the simple reason William Afton stuffs his victims into the animatronic suits and I don't know about you but I don’t think a child and fit inside balloon boy or JJ.
@@djkalla2973 Let's go over these points one by one.
1. Being an easter egg who appears very rarely does not necessarily mean that the character isn't real. Sure, it doesn't confirm she exists, but saying that she can't be a real character because of that is very close-minded. Or do you mean to tell me that Shadow Freddy doesn't exist in FNAF's lore? Or Yenndo, despite the fact he appeared in Help Wanted 2?
2. Ultimate Custom Night is most likely canon to FNAF's lore for a multitude of reasons. JJ is in the game, which makes her canon to some extent. Even if she's not a physical animatronic, she was something that both the FNAF 2 guards and William Afton saw. If UCN is canon, you can't pick and choose what parts of it are canon or not. If the game is canon and later games don't contradict what it presents, then those things are canon. Also, Nightmare Balloon Boy specifically was stated to be canon by Scott Cawthon sometime after FNAF 4's Halloween Update.
3. You can include things for FNAF as a game while also being part of the story. Golden Freddy, the posters of the kids crying, the newspaper, all of these easter eggs in FNAF 1 are there mainly to be easter eggs to give players something interesting to look at or be spooked by while also serving as hints and pieces of the game's hidden story. JJ's inclusion in the games can be both for cosmetic/gameplay and story reasons. They are not mutually exclusive.
4. While it is true that the original group that later became the Withereds had the kids stuffed into them, that is not the only way that souls can possess an animatronic. FNAF 6 shows us how Charlie possessed the Puppet, and it simply layed down beside the body and that was enough for her to possess it. Who's to say that the souls of the kids in SAVETHEM couldn't have possessed the Toys in a similar manner.
I know my theory's not the most solid one in the world, but at least try to use arguments that work.
@@veronicamoment I just don't think it makes sense why Afton would leave the victims lying on the floor out in the open and to counter argue your point of possession not having to be caused by stuffing I think the reason he didn't do it with Charlotte is because that was the first person he killed before going off the hook and killed everyone else. My point of her being an easter egg isn't to prove shes non cannon but it sure as hell doesn't help her situation it's also about her lack of appearances only 3 game appearances and 1 of them not even being cannon, pretty much every other easter egg character has appeared more than 1 time after their debut (Shadow Bonnie for example appears in, FNAF 2, FNAF 3, FNAF world, UCN, and FNAF AR). About your point of her not having arms in UCN, we know scott does not like reusing models in his games and your not meant to see her arms anyways and the reason Balloon boy has his arms is because you can actually see one in the vent and i can imagine modeling the entire arm would be easier than just making his hand nub.
@@djkalla2973Scott says clearly that all the details make differences and that there is a reason