Video Chapters 0:28 What is Post-structuralism? 1:28 History 2:27 Key Ideas 2:29 1) 3 General Assumptions 2:33 a) The “Self” as Conflicting Tensions 3:08 b) Meaning as Created 3:40 c) Multifaceted Interpretations 4:02 2) Destabilized Meaning 4:31 3) Deconstruction 5:14 4) Metalanguage 6:01 Criticisms - SUBSCRIBE to our Channel ruclips.net/user/LanguageIdeas LIKE and FOLLOW us on Social Media web.facebook.com/people/Language-and-Ideas/100090812957708/
Just discovered your channel . Love it so much already . keep up the good work. i personally prefer your videos that touches upon primarily Sociological topics to a lesser extent philosophical . i would be extremely excited to see videos that focuses upon the most famous sociological figures ideas for examples.
Examples of such social concepts are culture, historical context, and identity; while of such linguistic concepts are discourse, semiotics, and pragmatics.
The idea of metalanguage was not proposed by Barthes, it was already used in philosophy of logic by Tarski, da Costa, Putnam, Black and others... rather it was reinterpreted by Barthes. Also, the criticism of self-contradiction criticism is a bad one, I suppose (as an analytic philosopher myself). The post-steucturalist, I imagine, would welcome the conclusion instead of be hurt by it as the logical positivist was hurt by the criticism against the verificationist principle. Anyway, nice video. I learned a lot.
Post structuralist always try to establish multiple meaning and rejects that there is a single meaning for a word, then how is it possible that post-structuralist accept many meaning to a single word, if that so Post structutalist are only the critics of single meaning and not the proposer for multiple meaning Am i right??
Video Chapters
0:28 What is Post-structuralism?
1:28 History
2:27 Key Ideas
2:29 1) 3 General Assumptions
2:33 a) The “Self” as Conflicting Tensions
3:08 b) Meaning as Created
3:40 c) Multifaceted Interpretations
4:02 2) Destabilized Meaning
4:31 3) Deconstruction
5:14 4) Metalanguage
6:01 Criticisms
-
SUBSCRIBE to our Channel
ruclips.net/user/LanguageIdeas
LIKE and FOLLOW us on Social Media
web.facebook.com/people/Language-and-Ideas/100090812957708/
Just discovered your channel . Love it so much already . keep up the good work. i personally prefer your videos that touches upon primarily Sociological topics to a lesser extent philosophical . i would be extremely excited to see videos that focuses upon the most famous sociological figures ideas for examples.
Thank you so much for your kind words! 😊
Sure! We'll make some videos about those topics soon. 🙂
Great video, glad to find this channel!🌸
Thank you! 😊
Best video explaining it. Good job!
Thank you so much! 😊
THANK YOU
I appreciate this
Thank you too for watching! 😊
Good👍👍👌
Thank you! 😊
Hello! Can you pls share your insights from Post-structuralism to Post-modernism ? Thanks.
Hi! I recommend watching our two videos on those topics for a more detailed explanation. 🙂
What are the social and linguistic concepts which influence our shared meanings and constructions in the West?
Examples of such social concepts are culture, historical context, and identity; while of such linguistic concepts are discourse, semiotics, and pragmatics.
Very Useful ,Thank you.😊
Thank you so much @pavithra249! 😊
The idea of metalanguage was not proposed by Barthes, it was already used in philosophy of logic by Tarski, da Costa, Putnam, Black and others... rather it was reinterpreted by Barthes.
Also, the criticism of self-contradiction criticism is a bad one, I suppose (as an analytic philosopher myself). The post-steucturalist, I imagine, would welcome the conclusion instead of be hurt by it as the logical positivist was hurt by the criticism against the verificationist principle.
Anyway, nice video. I learned a lot.
Post structuralist always try to establish multiple meaning and rejects that there is a single meaning for a word, then how is it possible that post-structuralist accept many meaning to a single word, if that so Post structutalist are only the critics of single meaning and not the proposer for multiple meaning
Am i right??
Thanks for that enlightening comment! 🙂
Who are you?
I'm Language and Ideas. 🙂💡
I am you
This is why no one knows what woman means!!!
Exactly!