National Security Law is not interpreted under Hong Kong court and common law system. Its definition and usage is controlled by PRC. This is an evidence of PRC breaking promise of "one country two systems" and the common law system. It is in doubt that how we can keep on trusting these political changes not affecting Hong Kong economy and financial development. If the PRC cannot show respect on the common law and ease the abuse of use on national security law, who can imagine how foreign people can be willing to invest Hong Kong under PRC law system and still feel safe? but at least it is not surprise that some rich people are already in danger like Alibaba's Jack Ma and Appledaily's Jimmy.
_"National Security Law is not interpreted under Hong Kong court and common law system."_ Of course it is (IDIOT) since Hong Kong have an independent judiciary, and as we all know, Hong Kong have no extradition treaty with the PRC. It DOES NOT contradict the "One country 2 systems" and IT DOES NOT violate the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The reason the PRC enacted the National Security Law was that Hong Kong have been obliged to do it themselves but never got it done. If the National security law did not confirm with Hong Kong basic law it would be struck down by the Hong Kong court of final appeal. Would claim the British former chief prosecutor of Hong Kong to be a trustworthy source on this. Grenville Cross was the Director of Public Prosecutions in Hong Kong 1997-2009 so he should know a lot about the law. ruclips.net/video/vgx3o5URI5I/видео.html ruclips.net/video/O8eMeA0Hch8/видео.html ruclips.net/video/-CsxmowGjcw/видео.html
@@qinby1182 Hong Kong’s sovereignty was returned to China in 1997. Governance depends on sovereignty. The embodiment of governance is the Basic Law of Hong Kong, which National People's Congress has the right to amend. The National People's Congress can also change Hong Kong's judicial system。 The Sino-British Joint Declaration is already a historical document.
@@irmtouch Hong Kong HAS NEVER BEEN SOVEREIGN so really China COULD do "anything" but it has not since it follows the joint the sino-british joint declaration. Since the Basic Law is the product of the the sino-british joint declaration China CAN NOT change this without breaking the the sino-british joint declaration, which it has not done. So really "What if's" and hypotheticals does not really matter. As it is the the sino-british joint declaration is followed and hence the basic law, ANYTHING violating the basic law would be struck down by the Hong Kong final appeal court. What happens after 2047 is another discussion. Should also add that Hong Kong ranks No 3 on the Human Freedom index, USA and UK share No 17... "liberate them"
@@qinby1182 The Basic Law Preamble Hong Kong has been part of the territory of China since ancient times; it was occupied by Britain after the Opium War in 1840. On 19 December 1984, the Chinese and British Governments signed the Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong, affirming that the Government of the People’s Republic of China will resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong with effect from 1 July 1997, thus fulfilling the longcherished common aspiration of the Chinese people for the recovery of Hong Kong. Article 158 The power of interpretation of this Law shall be vested in the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. Article 159 The power of amendment of this Law shall be vested in the National People’s Congress The right to interpret and modify the Basic Law is not yours, you have no right to interpret the law
"Judges have faced criticism from pro-Beijing media and Chinese authorities. But as yet, there have been no official attempts to undermine court decisions." 👉🏻 Sooner or later, they won't leave it "intact".
The fact that people have been protesting since 2013, other nations looking the other way with -real-politics has me doubtful for the future of our world. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
@@chililucas5483 Figures? In 2019 local election, most winners were pro-democracy and they represent people's voice. You don't know it? what a pathetic guy.... You are the one have been dreaming LOL.
@@Western_Decline To point out that Hong Kong ranks No 3 on the human Freedom index and really it is the USA and the UK who share No 17 are the ones who needs to be "liberated" is also rarely mentioned,.
Hong Kong’s sovereignty was returned to China in 1997. Governance depends on sovereignty. The embodiment of governance is the Basic Law of Hong Kong, which National People's Congress has the right to amend. The National People's Congress can also change Hong Kong's judicial system。 The Sino-British Joint Declaration is already a historical document. The definition of one country, two systems is also defined by the Basic Law.
Using technicality in the law is what you see in Singapore. In mainland, they use everything, technicality or just weird interpretation of the law. Neither countries should be considered as democratic although most consider the first country as democratic.
Given what I've heard from adults who actually lived in HK or has family in HK, I support implementation of the HK National Security Law. Any society must have law and order in order to be sustainable. So called "violations" of civil liberties are excuses to destabilize a sensitive and impactful region. For example, patriotism should be a requisite of any government official or candidate seeking office. All elected and appointed officials in the US must swear an oath to the allegiance of the country. Would anyone want an official who doesn't love or isn't loyal to the country he/she is supposed to serve?
Reminder: the NSL has been used to target Benedict Rogers, someone in the United Kingdom. Meaning they could be used to target even international targets, not just people in Hong Kong.
@SalaPepi XD there actually wasn't 2 million ppl. Heehee. This is what the organisers said. Independent assessment put the figure at 330k. That is only 5% of the population. Heehee
Very peaceful after the implementation of the national security law. We've learnt a lot from the duo standard of the western media. Look at Capitol Hill vs. the same in HK's Legislative Council back in 2019.
@@huangboris I'm not "western people" im an individual and so are you. I'm concerned with the power ideologies like communism has done to humanity, which is evident from the 20th century. It turns people on each other. You may think this ideology gives you power, but its ruining your mind.
@@huangboris Mate, national security law imposed by a dictatorship is just barely a tool for the regime to eliminate the voices it don't like but not protecting the public interest.
@@Gomangoman11 Commie did not give us power, we become stronger and stronger because of our blood. Many countries run commie or demo systems but only very few have became stable and wealth.
First and foremost, Hong Kong government and Hong Kong police have done nothing wrong and the extradition bill must be passed at this stage. This extradition bill is aimed at providing a quicker way to send all criminals between Hong Kong and mainland China. I do believe that many people disagreed to this bill and that I respect and accept. They demostrated peacefully and rationally. Unfortunately, the protests have changed from a peaceful march to a city~widespread demostration. Many people brutally and violently attacked the pro~Beijing camps public figures and government officers, demanding for five purposes. They attempted to overturn the constitutional system which people pride for and what irrirates me is that they egregiously attacked the police whose duties are safeguarding the national security and protecting the public citizens. All protesters must be under arrested for their irresponsible acts.
after the national security law, HK is back to a peaceful and secure place. that's the only change, well, of course this is the change the west doesn't want to see
In a open society, it's impossible to have a 100% support rate to policy. It's common sense... Yet, the mainstream of HKers are pro-democracy. so, most of the HKers disagree with this CCP law
Is it true that more than 3 million HK people (75% adult of whole population) signed the petition to support security laws? Western countries have been using some HK traitors to slow down Chinese develop and advancement.
A traitor to what? Rather be a traitor to a so called leader, with so called power, than a traitor to myself, who'd just roll over and get fucked with the aditude you're promoting.
no more Hong Kong, HK government should request China government and UN to rename the city name from Hong Kong to Xianggang, so that the city is forever treated as one of the China cities...
National Security Law is not interpreted under Hong Kong court and common law system. Its definition and usage is controlled by PRC. This is an evidence of PRC breaking promise of "one country two systems" and the common law system. It is in doubt that how we can keep on trusting these political changes not affecting Hong Kong economy and financial development. If the PRC cannot show respect on the common law and ease the abuse of use on national security law, who can imagine how foreign people can be willing to invest Hong Kong under PRC law system and still feel safe? but at least it is not surprise that some rich people are already in danger like Alibaba's Jack Ma and Appledaily's Jimmy.
HK already back to china since 1997
_"National Security Law is not interpreted under Hong Kong court and common law system."_
Of course it is (IDIOT) since Hong Kong have an independent judiciary, and as we all know, Hong Kong have no extradition treaty with the PRC.
It DOES NOT contradict the "One country 2 systems" and IT DOES NOT violate the Sino-British Joint Declaration.
The reason the PRC enacted the National Security Law was that Hong Kong have been obliged to do it themselves but never got it done.
If the National security law did not confirm with Hong Kong basic law it would be struck down by the Hong Kong court of final appeal.
Would claim the British former chief prosecutor of Hong Kong to be a trustworthy source on this.
Grenville Cross was the Director of Public Prosecutions in Hong Kong 1997-2009 so he should know a lot about the law.
ruclips.net/video/vgx3o5URI5I/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/O8eMeA0Hch8/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/-CsxmowGjcw/видео.html
@@qinby1182 Hong Kong’s sovereignty was returned to China in 1997. Governance depends on sovereignty. The embodiment of governance is the Basic Law of Hong Kong, which National People's Congress has the right to amend. The National People's Congress can also change Hong Kong's judicial system。 The Sino-British Joint Declaration is already a historical document.
@@irmtouch
Hong Kong HAS NEVER BEEN SOVEREIGN so really China COULD do "anything" but it has not since it follows the joint the sino-british joint declaration.
Since the Basic Law is the product of the the sino-british joint declaration China CAN NOT change this without breaking the the sino-british joint declaration, which it has not done.
So really "What if's" and hypotheticals does not really matter.
As it is the the sino-british joint declaration is followed and hence the basic law, ANYTHING violating the basic law would be struck down by the Hong Kong final appeal court.
What happens after 2047 is another discussion.
Should also add that Hong Kong ranks No 3 on the Human Freedom index, USA and UK share No 17... "liberate them"
@@qinby1182
The Basic Law Preamble
Hong Kong has been part of the territory of China since ancient
times; it was occupied by Britain after the Opium War in 1840. On 19
December 1984, the Chinese and British Governments signed the Joint
Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong, affirming that the Government
of the People’s Republic of China will resume the exercise of sovereignty
over Hong Kong with effect from 1 July 1997, thus fulfilling the longcherished common aspiration of the Chinese people for the recovery of
Hong Kong.
Article 158
The power of interpretation of this Law shall be vested in the
Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress.
Article 159
The power of amendment of this Law shall be vested in the National
People’s Congress
The right to interpret and modify the Basic Law is not yours, you have no right to interpret the law
Free the US capital market!!! No more manipulation of the WALL STREET!!!!!!
"Judges have faced criticism from pro-Beijing media and Chinese authorities. But as yet, there have been no official attempts to undermine court decisions."
👉🏻
Sooner or later, they won't leave it "intact".
The fact that people have been protesting since 2013, other nations looking the other way with -real-politics has me doubtful for the future of our world.
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Do you actually live in Hong Kong? I do. Most decent people are glad the riots and violent attacks are over.
Chili Lucas Mainstream of HKers are pro-democracy and have been supporting the protests. Not sure how you defined most
@@boawin5642 you having a laugh. Most were against the riots. Keep dreaming.
@@boawin5642 Just because they have the loudest voice.
@@chililucas5483 Figures?
In 2019 local election, most winners were pro-democracy and they represent people's voice. You don't know it? what a pathetic guy....
You are the one have been dreaming LOL.
This report failed to inform outsiders that there are two camps in Hong Kong: the Yellow Camp (Pro-Independence) and Blue Camp (Pro-China).
Why would Western media present both sides? This doesn’t serve their CIA regime change interests.
@@Western_Decline
To point out that Hong Kong ranks No 3 on the human Freedom index and really it is the USA and the UK who share No 17 are the ones who needs to be "liberated" is also rarely mentioned,.
#JimmyLai is a legend in #HongKong 🇭🇰... his arrest and end of his media newspaper 🗞 📰 #AppleDaily signaled a sea-change 💔😢
Hong Kong’s sovereignty was returned to China in 1997. Governance depends on sovereignty. The embodiment of governance is the Basic Law of Hong Kong, which National People's Congress has the right to amend. The National People's Congress can also change Hong Kong's judicial system。 The Sino-British Joint Declaration is already a historical document.
The definition of one country, two systems is also defined by the Basic Law.
In short, CCP has absolute control over HK. All such declarations and laws are just to serve official narrative, nothing else.
When UK has nothing else left expect barking as a loyal dog for US after the collapse of Great Britain, what a shame
Can't agree more. The UK will sink even lower than the US.
well said！
Using technicality in the law is what you see in Singapore. In mainland, they use everything, technicality or just weird interpretation of the law. Neither countries should be considered as democratic although most consider the first country as democratic.
Haha. Can you call any country democratic? The USA? I can write a book about how democracy has failed in the US.
Hong Kongers are welcome in the United Kingdom
Please go and don’t come back
JoeL what’s wrong Joel? Have I offended the CCP?
@@justjackman No, what's wrong with you?
They are not welcomed in UK, if they really apply for permanant residents or even VISA in UK, see what Boris will say.
Those HKers are affluent , young and most of them come with capital.
I thought they learned a thing or two after Capitol. I was wrong.
This occurred before the capitol riot.
Given what I've heard from adults who actually lived in HK or has family in HK, I support implementation of the HK National Security Law. Any society must have law and order in order to be sustainable. So called "violations" of civil liberties are excuses to destabilize a sensitive and impactful region. For example, patriotism should be a requisite of any government official or candidate seeking office. All elected and appointed officials in the US must swear an oath to the allegiance of the country. Would anyone want an official who doesn't love or isn't loyal to the country he/she is supposed to serve?
The grass is greener in the UK. Better jobs, bigger houses and freedom to hold peaceful riots.
If they riot in UK like they did in Hong Kong, do you honestly think the UK government will be as tolerant as the Chinese.
@@38284LHK 😃 One of the most ironic comments i have heard recently.
Reminder: the NSL has been used to target Benedict Rogers, someone in the United Kingdom. Meaning they could be used to target even international targets, not just people in Hong Kong.
Why don't you guys leave North Ireland free 🥱
Because the white man thinks he does best and knows best for everyone, in his ignorance.
LOL
@John Bull yeah, exactly! Why don't you just mind your own business, not China's business?
@John Bull Washington riot beautiful sight to seen
@John Bull I’m glad your to inform you that BNO business just diminished couple days ago😆
Traitors must be punished.
Dark times for Hong Kong.
Not all. Peaceful times. I am Brit having lived in HK 25 years
@SalaPepi XD there actually wasn't 2 million ppl. Heehee. This is what the organisers said. Independent assessment put the figure at 330k. That is only 5% of the population. Heehee
@@kavorkaa PolyU actually
Actually good times for HK. All I gotta say is “beautiful sight to behold to your beloved U.S capital hill. Enough said.
@@kavorkaa actually u can say what u want. HK is now free from outsiders. U can suck it
Good china
As a Hong Kong permanent citizen, I am very proud of the moves of the Hong Kong government. Hong Kong becomes very peaceful now. ✌️✌️
Oh hi bots,
Very peaceful after the implementation of the national security law. We've learnt a lot from the duo standard of the western media. Look at Capitol Hill vs. the same in HK's Legislative Council back in 2019.
many 5 cent army are commenting....lol (I come from HK)
I come from HK too. Will you pay me ?
@@skyskysky6259 You're "Running Dog" traitor ! All this for a lousy 0.50 cents.....Pathetic !
@@skyskysky6259 Pay you 50 cents to be loyal to HK people and criticize the government, will you do then? I can pay it immediately.
GOODBYE FREE FINANCIAL MARKET !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
U mean uk London. That's true. Bye-bye
@@chanteddy1520 That must be New York! Lol!
For good.
Wanna talk about how protestors also killed innocent civilians?
Wanna say smth about CCP mass murdering?)
@@vladimirsorokin9674 wanna say smth about usa mass murdering blacks and natives?
@@sherkjlsjdf6334 don’t change the subject, CCP is the one with literal death camps
The new law makes Hong Kong more peaceful and prosper ! No more foreign interests in Hong Kong ! Bravo !!!!
Say "foreign" you mean Chinese interest?
You seems don't know what is international financial centre, isn't it?
Soon to be flooded with Mainlanders ! Avoid !
It is so strange that in modern time there is a city without National Security Law.
It's so strange that in modern times there is still multiple authoritarian communist countries.
@@Gomangoman11 Its so strange that in western brains commie=evil, which commie was invented by western people.
@@huangboris I'm not "western people" im an individual and so are you. I'm concerned with the power ideologies like communism has done to humanity, which is evident from the 20th century. It turns people on each other. You may think this ideology gives you power, but its ruining your mind.
@@huangboris Mate, national security law imposed by a dictatorship is just barely a tool for the regime to eliminate the voices it don't like but not protecting the public interest.
@@Gomangoman11 Commie did not give us power, we become stronger and stronger because of our blood. Many countries run commie or demo systems but only very few have became stable and wealth.
national security law
But the real question is, is our tax free money save?
This law is badly needed and is effective. It's not a surprise that criminals and their supporters hate it.
Good job China.
Excellent Job China.
Bad job China
Great job China!
@@kavorkaa CIA bot alert
@@kavorkaa TROLL!!!!
First and foremost, Hong Kong government and Hong Kong police have done nothing wrong and the extradition bill must be passed at this stage. This extradition bill is aimed at providing a quicker way to send all criminals between Hong Kong and mainland China. I do believe that many people disagreed to this bill and that I respect and accept. They demostrated peacefully and rationally. Unfortunately, the protests have changed from a peaceful march to a city~widespread demostration. Many people brutally and violently attacked the pro~Beijing camps public figures and government officers, demanding for five purposes. They attempted to overturn the constitutional system which people pride for and what irrirates me is that they egregiously attacked the police whose duties are safeguarding the national security and protecting the public citizens. All protesters must be under arrested for their irresponsible acts.
Enjoy your Newly gained freedom ! Hahahahahaa !
after the national security law, HK is back to a peaceful and secure place. that's the only change, well, of course this is the change the west doesn't want to see
Not all HK people are unhappy with national security law.
Lam and her family are okay with it..
Yes not all, just the majority. You can tell from last year's district council election.
In a open society, it's impossible to have a 100% support rate to policy. It's common sense... Yet, the mainstream of HKers are pro-democracy. so, most of the HKers disagree with this CCP law
@@boawin5642 do you have any evidence to support your statement?
Not comprehensive enough. DW channel has better coverage.
Well, it’s only five minutes long.
DW is also seriously biased. They wear the same pants.
What change?
The answer is no more Riot.
Go back to China,五毛
The so-called "Riot" has been supported by mainstream of HK resident. opps...
@@boawin5642 When the US called the Capitol incident a RIOT.
Hong Kong have a lot of RIOT in the year of 2019
@@kavorkaa Hong Kong is part of China
@@yaupeter3783 Are you talking the US or HK? Can HK elect CE?
Was Mao a rioter leader as he mobilised lower class join his revolution?
Very biased reporting, clear propaganda
Wumao
@@kavorkaa You're all brainwashed
@@kavorkaa
“Everyone I don’t like is a wumao”
@@kavorkaa
And here is your pathetic logical fallacy that is on the border of schizophrenia.
CCP trolls?)
Is it true that more than 3 million HK people (75% adult of whole population) signed the petition to support security laws? Western countries have been using some HK traitors to slow down Chinese develop and advancement.
Lmao, how much ccp 5 cents trolls in the comment section?)
ok vladimir very cool
Right, all people don’t agree with you == ccp 5 cents
@@jlzhaoImao
@@jlzhao Exactly! The narcissistic West (especially the US) can't bear the truth!
Those Commie Trolls pretending to be from HK ! What these Pathetic fools do for a measly 0.50ents ! Sad !
Traitors and thugs should be punished in any country！
Like the mob who stormed the Capitol?
but it’s a rational action to a communist country
@@kavorkaa 哈哈哈哈哈哈哈酸葡萄
A traitor to what? Rather be a traitor to a so called leader, with so called power, than a traitor to myself, who'd just roll over and get fucked with the aditude you're promoting.
@@dadikkedude Hong Kong is a part of China 🇨🇳
no more Hong Kong, HK government should request China government and UN to rename the city name from Hong Kong to Xianggang, so that the city is forever treated as one of the China cities...
光復香港
你在这犯傻没有用。你要去警察局前面喊才行。记得开直播给大家看
crap