Sigma 10-18mm Fuji-X vs Fujinon 10-24mm vs Tamron 11-20mm | which is best for YOU?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Amazon affiliate links (helps support the channel :)
Fujinon 10-24mm f4: amzn.to/3SWg0oP
Tamron 11-20mm f2.8: amzn.to/47kasZE
-
I was going to review this new Sigma 10-18mm for Fujifilm X mount but I realized that there are 2 other lenses in the mix and I'd be good to take a look at all 3 these lenses.
-
My website: www.crisphotography.info
My Instagram: @cris_photo_graphy
@cris_weddings
TikTok: @crisphotograpy
A few other factors to consider, too: 1) only the Fuji lens zooms internally 2) the Fuji has built-in stabilization 3) the close focussing distance on the Fuji is a fair bit longer, I think 4) the quality of the bokeh (although not a huge factor in an ultrawide, obviously 5) the quality of the sunstars (the Fuji is kind of meh in this respect) 6) I think (but not sure) that only the Fuji has an aperture ring - then again, the mark 2 version of the Fuji is definitely the only one with aperture markings…
Thanks for the extra info 👍🏼
Yes first gen had no markings, mark II does.
Cheers!
I'm working on this exact same video and article, ha ha. We think the same :-) Great overview
ha ha am sure ! Looking forward to your review ;)
I'm actually looking to compare the Sigma IQ against the Viltrox 13 (where I would just do quick Pano's if I need to go wider) especially on the new 40mp Sensors.
Still very interested in your opinion on the subject, Take ☺️👍🏻
Over here in Singapore, the street prices aren't quite as good as you could get on your side of the pond.
The Sigma is significantly cheaper than the other 2 lenses though.
Fujifilm does provide some freebies when you buy locally - typically, this would be a lens pouch & a lens servicing voucher for lenses; for cameras, they usually give out SD cards, camera bag, lens loan voucher, workshops, and free prints.
Prices excluding GST/ VAT (8% currently but will be 9% in a few weeks).
Fuji 10-24mm ~USD1049/-
Sigma 10-18mm ~USD558/-
Tamron 11-20mm ~USD873/-
Oh wow! Good to know - thanks for sharing that
Hi Cris, I don't know what your experience with the Tamron is but I tried it on a X-S20 and was quite pleased with the results. When I put it on the XT5 not so good. I find the fuji 10-24 (first edition) better suited to the 40mp sensor. It will be interesting to see how the Sigma performs on the XT5.
Thanks! I did not try it on a new sensor (still rocking my good old XT2 and XT3) but I believe you on the fact that the first gen is good for those (great lens - shot tens of thousands of photos with it). Take care!
I read that there is nothing new optically on the updated 10-24 so it does not fully resolve the 40mp sensor, but you won't notice without massive cropping and pixel peeping.
"When I put it on the XT5 not so good" Keep in mind that you're not actually losing TOTAL image detail, only detail relative to pixel size thanks to the higher resolution. At the same viewing size you will obviously not lose anything. With that said the Sigma is better optically than the Tamron.
I am very confused between sigma 10-18 + sigma 18-50 or tamron 11-20 + tamron 17-70 needs for architecture, travel, landscape photography. Do you have any suggestions on which one should I choose? Thanks 🙏🏻
Hello 👋🏼 for travel I’d go with the sigma 18-50 personally (and if you can the 10-18) these are small and efficient. You might want to check my sigma 18-50mm review on this channel for more info 😉 take care
How do these lenses stack up to each other with regards to:
- Sharpness at typical landscape FOV and apertures (5.6 and above)
- Flaring
- Sunstars
Would be interesting to see a video with more head to head pixel-peeping technical-obsessive comparisons between these lenses since you have them all on hand :)
Hey 👋🏼 I believe o already answered this comment didn’t I?
The Sigma and Fuji have an extra 1mm which cannot be found in post. The Sigma's missing 6mm can be cropped.
Very true 👍🏼
How will Sigma 10-18 perform in low light on XH2 ? Thinking of getting it for dance floor shots for wedding work
It should be ok - but am not a fan of the AF specifically in lowlight. The quality will be ok (XH2 is a good body) but I’d take the Fuji counterpart rather IF budget allows (otherwise it’ll be fine - maybe a miss here and there)
Would you choose the sigma over, say a 350 dollar used 10-24? Currently there’s a lot in the used market. It may have to come down to whether the maximum aperture and more compact size is worth the cost.
I kinda like the form factor of the Sigma personality and it’d be a big factor in my decision. That’s what I think 😅
Take care!
Thanks for making this video. I decided to go with the Sigma based on this video. You earned a sub from me.
Thank YOU for watching and glad it was helpful! 😉
One other point is that the Fuji has image stabilization. That means you may not need to carry the extra weight of a tripod. In fact I have never used a tripod with this lens either for landscape or architectural photography.
Very true. That said, for real estate you will want to lower your shutter speed due to a smaller aperture (f8-f11) and often you’ll need a tripod to do bracketing which means that OIS or not (in fact on a tripod I disable it) the photos will be stable.
For a walk, etc. It’s a very good point though - thanks you for bringing that up!
And with IBIS one can probably leave the tripod at home with any of these lenses.
A wide angle can be very useful for events and creative portraits if you know what you are doing. Then the f2.8 is a big advantage.
Absolutely. You can also shoot at say ISO 800 instead of 400 and you get your stop back from f2.8 to f4. Unless you’re really close (I advice against it when shooting a human, animal, etc.) the DOF won’t change that much from 2.8 to 4. Or even go 1/60 vs 1/125 and again gain the stop back.
How’s f2.8 that big an advantage for event photography vs f4? In my years of experience shooting 3-4 events per week including weddings, corporate and more, I pretty much always used an aperture that starts around f4-5.6 when shooting wide because a) I want more DOF to get everyone in focus as much as possible and b) I use tripods often and can lower my shutter speed as needed (and cameras are better and better in high ISOs).
@@cris_photographyI do music and events that are often very low light and I feel the big difference in my lenses when shooting f/4. Significantly less light than my f1.4 primes. Obviously that's not 2.8-4 but low light stuff gets tough when you have f4 because you have to crank the iso
I heard the Sigma was only weather sealed at the mount, but not internally like the Tamron and the WR version of the XF 10-24. That would mean that it's still at risk for dust and moisture.
Also, you can find the non WR 1st gen version of the XF 10-24 used for about $400 in excellent shape, while the Tamron and Sigma are both new enough that you're looking at MSRP, so if you don't need weather sealing or the faster aperture you can save a lot on the Fuji.
Thanks and that's right, only a gasket at the mount.
If I have to be very honest (and I do) I never had any issue with a non-WR lens EVER. I feel like the WR is an important option to some but definitely and by all means not a must. You might be someone that shoots in humid and/or dusty environments but personally for my shooting style that ain't a deal breaker at all.
I agree on the first gen Fujinon (which I still own and I used for this review basically) it can be found for a very competitive price on the second hand market. The sigma's overall footprint is unbeatable though and that's its strongest pro vs the other two.
Thanks for the comment and take care!
where does it say the tamron is weather sealed or even dust resistant?
@@aeonbreak4728 Literally on the product page. "For greater protection when shooting outdoors, leak-resistant seals throughout the lens barrel help protect your equipment."
Hi Andy, thank you for another interesting video. Out of curiosity, which filter size did you choose for this set of lenses?
Thanks John, what do you mean? The filter thread?
@@cris_photography Heh, I posted a comment under a wrong vide... I'm such a moron... 🙈🤣
🤣😉 no worries
I will pick it up tomorrow, trading in the 14mm f/2.8, which has been barely used. I also have the Fuji 10-24 I--quite good--but I wanted a lighter package for my weekend with 18-55 2.8-4 and Sigma 10-18 with my XE3. Thanks for your review.
Nice! You will love the size (am sure by now you received it?)
@@cris_photography Hi Cris, I have receuved it and used it. it's a little jewel and sharpness is exceptional in the frame center. Very satisfied. I traded in the 14mm f/2.8 which almost never used
Sigma 10-18 In Norway cost 8 599 NOK or 805,61 USD
Tamron 11-20mm = 1048,36USD
Fujinon 10-24mm = 1116,94 USD
Would be nice to buy them as cheap as you sed
🙂
Thanks! They are - and even cheaper here in Switzerland but unfortunately prices are not the same everywhere 🤦🏻😩 take care
Hi, thanks for the video:) Does it lose focus when you zoom in/out, especially while recording video ? or have you noticed any light change when you zoom in/out during video shooting ?
Hello! Yes it does (being a Fuji camera and not a Canon or Sony the AF isn’t that good). Otherwise if you’re in manual mode and manual focus there won’t be changes of light or focus. And that’s the way I normally film. Cheers!
@@cris_photography Thanks for the reply :) Which camera did you use ? Because AF performance is better in newer cameras. For example XT5 has a much better AF performance than XT3
I own the sigma and Fuji M1 im not sure which one to take on vacation. I really like the extra 19-24 available on the Fuji.
I’d go with the Fuji personally - but depends on your needs. Cheers
@@cris_photography that's what I'm leaning towards. Thanks.
Could you do your real estate photoshoots with only the Sigma or do the Fuji 10-24 range is needed/prefered ? Thank you !
Hello 👋🏼 it really depends what you’re going for and what look you want. I personally range between 10 and 15mm when I shoot RE but some like to have a closer crop. But the sigma I think is good for most RE shots.
Take care!
Wonder why you didn't cover the Fuji 8-16
Because 8 goes under 10 which is the minimum of the 3 and 16 is under 18 which is under the max of the 3.
The 8-16 really is an Astro photography lens (can’t see another reason to buy such a huge lens - never even considered that lens really). Also the size is more that’s twice the heaviest lens of the bunch!
Thanks.. very helpful.
You’re very welcome!
you don't understand ISO , F2.8 mean ISO6400 where F4 is ISO 12800
Thanks for the message