Bishop Schneider CALLS OUT 'legalistic... narrow' SSPX detractors
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 янв 2025
- Bishop Schneider has weighed into the SSPX debate and had choice words for those who publicly detract the SSPX as schismatic.
BECOME A REAL CHRISTIAN MAN WITH THIS BOOK: www.amazon.com...
DONATE HERE thekennedyrepo....
PATREON: / thekennedyreport
KENNEDY’S BOOKS HERE: www.amazon.com...
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Bishop Schneider just recently said a low Mass at an SSPX chapel so obviously he believes they are in full communion
What chapel was that?
@@cynthiasauer9818 it was in Atlanta
I attended his mass at the SSPX chapel. It is true he was there. Fr Altman was also in attendance at that same mass that morning. SSPX is not in schism, I sympathize with those who are confused on this as we are living in very confusing times. Just make sure to err on the side of caution when calling out a group of faithful Catholics as outside the church. That accusation is itself a sign of schism by claiming Catholics are not Catholics. This could have negative consequences to the accuser. Especially when its prejudice which is discrimination according to ignorance.
Thank you good Bishop! I have been attending masses at the SSPX seminary in Dillwyn Virginia since 2017; one of the best things I have ever decided to do!
His Excellency said it. I believe it.
Francis said the SSPX is in schism. Do you believe him? Francis' authority supersedes that of Schneider.
Common sense! Canonical sense should follow! Why be irrational? Illogical?
Personally I was brought into the church by the SSPX in 1975, and do not care what other people think of the SSPX.
It’s the true Mass & that’s all that is important!!!!
Amen
No. The Four Marks of the Church is all that matters. It was given to us by Christ within the Deposit of Faith. The Orthodox have a "true" mass, but we certainly would not offend Jesus by attending their churches.
The TRUE mass is the full pre-1955 Roman “Mass of Ages,” otherwise known as the “Mass of Saints.” The SSPX is doing the 1962 Latin mass, the creation of which was the result of Bugnini tampering.
I’m NOT calling the 1962 mass bad. In fact, my husband and I find it (and the SSPX) an extremely fulfilling alternative to the NO. It’s also a lot more common and easier to find lately than full pre-1955 masses. Being part of the SSPX (which has it’s own bishops) also gives it a certain amount of immunity from cancellation and tampering.
It is NOT, however, the full true traditional Roman Catholic mass of the Church. What’s different? In brief, Bugnini (architect of Vat II) stripped out many elements of the true mass and daily Catholic life, which had all been part of the original Rite. Though later cuts were much deeper, the 1962 mass was the first significant step.
So why, then, did the SSPX settle for the 1962 mass? The short answer is that it was the most minimally acceptable traditional Latin mass both sides (Archbishop Lefebvre and the Pope) could agree on. If it’s all we’re ever able to consistently experience, we’ll keep attending and thank God fervently for it, Archbishop Lefebvre and the SSPX. Having studied the full mass and learned the true extent of what has been lost, however, we’re praying for a return of the entire Church to the full traditional Roman Catholic mass someday.
@@dasan9178 speaking of bugnini , have you read father Charles Murr, murder in the 33rd degree? He has been a priest for decades , was and still is in the heart of all the great changes within the church .he knows everything for a fact doesnt follow conspiracy theories .Kennedy was asked by father Murr to put his voice on the audio version of the book .
@@berytus6746 I have listened to a number of videos with Fr. Murr. He’s as fascinating a speaker and Vatican insider as Malachi Martin. I do have his book! I’ve been trying to get time to read it, but have so many in line it’s difficult. I have, however, listened to enough of his talks on that topic to understand and agree with his allegation.
You have really helped me see how we, the SSPX, are not Schismatic.
Jesus says if you do not obey the pope you will go to hell in Matthew’s gospel chapter 18 verse 17. The sspx refuses to obey the pope. Pope Benedict said in reference to the sspx, that if anyone refuses to follow the pope they are automatically excommunicated. This was after he lifted the excommunications of the sspx bishops.
@themodern atholicw you are wrong. Go to Kennedy earlier video on SSPX. They are not in anyway shape or form schismatic. The Code of Cannon law says they’re not.
@@bobtosi9346 the code of canon law says they are in schism. Canon 751. I don’t need someone else to tell me. Look up the meaning of the word schism. The sspx are in schism. Read the gospels, Jesus’ own words say that if you do not obey the pope you will go to tell. Sspx does not obey the pope.
@@themoderncatholicwarrior7216 straight out papalatry, it was not like that before. Don't to much focused on the pope dude..
Edit: I myself a Catholic
@@hesselfridyanto Hey mate. Do more research, this organisation is evil. For example, they never got in trouble for saying the Latin mass, originally they got in trouble in 1976 for trying to ordain priest in secret. Who were these men and what is the secret? The secret is that some of them were criminals and sex offenders. It does not look good for Lefebvre, he needs prayers.
In Matthew’s gospel, the authority of the pope is the very authority of Christ. So if you say no to the pope you are saying no to Christ who promised to protect the pope from teaching error.
Thank you for your last comment. I joined the SSPX last year after fifty years of fruitless Novus Ordo services. Best thing I ever did. I was blasted by friends who said they are schismatic but I know they are not. Thank you to the bishop for his defence against people who slander the SSPX and are actually clueless about the society.
Same here, I left the N O and come to SSPX 2 yrs ago when the N O churches locked down. TLM is so different and it leads us to get closer to our Lord & His Holy Mother.
A+.....Kennedy!!! Thank you John Henry, and Archbishop Schneider!
“There’s nothing wrong with the SSPX .... there is something wrong with you!”. ~ Kennedy Hall
Love he said that!
Thank you for taking the time in breaking it down & explaining regarding the SSPX! We appreciate everything you have learned and shared with us so we can go out to share this with others! The truth
Some people don't want to accept the SSPX because of pride. People want options, and the SSPX is a sign of contradiction, and people do not want to face the witness of Archbishop Lefebvre. People who run from the truth and seek what is comfortable to their emotions slander and liable the SSPX.
If the SSPX embraced the errors in Vatican II, they would immediately be given praise, adulation and "canonical status" from the modernists in Rome. That has always been the number one reason that has kept the SSPX from any agreement with Rome.
Someone needs to tell the gentleman who does 'The Vortex' on the Church Militant...
@@Cadpat07 he doesn't know what he is talking about.
Your are kind to call him a gentleman. I find Michael Voris offensive and not gentle.
Yup!
Voris/CM have done some valuable work but I'm pretty sure no one died and made him pope.
He has no authority to speak. He can have his opinions. Some right others wrong.
Why do they have a chapel w the Blessed Sacrament if they are not even under the local ordinary of Detroit? That sounds pretty schism... uh separate from the Church.
hmmmm can anybody answer that one.
Seriously.
Hopefully Lofton and Voris will stop what they have been doing.
Thank you. We, in the SSPX of Sanford Florida, invite anyone interested in worshipping God in a Traditional Latin Mass, please come join us. 🙏
I go to the one in Davie,Fl. Getting very crowed. Hopefully, they will start building their bigger chapel next year
I go to Sts. Peter and Paul SSPX chapel in Albuquerque, NM. That is, after years of the Novus Ordo believing there was nothing else. What a blessing.
You have some WONDERFUL people and priests down there in Sanford! God bless you.
There is also an SSPX in Phoenix Arizona, Our Lady of Sorrows! I am a cradle SSPX! Thank you to my parents and Archbishop Marcel Lefebrve!!
Thank you. So grateful for Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre ⚜️
Love seeing the statue of Our Lady in the background 😊
Keep it up Kennedy! Grateful for your work.
This is THE most spot-on and succinct presentation I've ever heard that makes clear (to the fair-minded) that SSPX is NOT schismatic. Well done!
I wish someone would call out Patrick Madrid from Relevant Radio.
People call him almost everyday and ask him about SSPX and he ALWAYS says they're not valid and none of their faculties are invalid as well as no Catholic should go there.
Shame! Lies!
Blessed be God! Blessed be Bishop Schneider. May the SSPX keep and promulgate the Deposit of Faith through their ministry!
Without the SSPX there will be no FSSP.
SSPX should be like the FSSP and come back to communion with the Church.
@@markrome9702 fssp should be brave and loyal to real Catholicism and our Lord like sspx, and not to accept everyday modernization as all can see
@@markrome9702 FSSP compromised Catholic Tradition and doctrine to have faculties to say the Traditional Latin Mass and administer Sacraments according to the books of 1962. The 3 fold compromise the FSSP made in order to have the old Mass and Sacraments was to:
1. Concede that the Novus Ordo Missae (which is a bastard rite), is the main rite of the Church, hence the terms Ordinary form / Extraordinary form.
2. Accept that the Second Vatican 2 council documents are ok as is and are to be implemented (complete with doctrinal errors and contradictions from what pre Vatican 2 Church taught) and cannot be criticized.
3. Accept the 1983 Code of Canon Law and 1992 Catechism are ok as is (complete with errors and contradictions from pre Vatican 2 Church taught).
If it was just about the Mass, the SSPX would have no business doing what they do, and they are the 1st to admit this. If you have not noticed by now, Vatican 2 is always the line that cannot be crossed, compromised or questioned.
The Vatican 2 Church is a new Religion, there are so many contradictions between the new and pre Vatican 2 Church. God is perfect and incapable of changing. This must beg the question, what is the purpose of all this?
The SSPX are a Blessing and lifeline to keep the true Faith in these dark times.
Please do some research before you make ignorant, (but I am sure well meaning) comments such as above.
BTW, Pope Francis and any of his predecessors who willingly suppressed the Mass of all Time and pushed Vatican 2 are the Schismatics.
God Bless.
@@Mariasol07 FSSP is loyal to real Catholicism, that's why they are Catholic and have a Catholic mission while the SSPX does not and is in schism.
@@TS-ex4ql "In the present circumstances I wish especially to make an appeal both solemn and heartfelt, paternal and fraternal, to all those who until now have been linked in various ways to the movement of Archbishop Lefebvre, that they may fulfil the grave duty of remaining united to the Vicar of Christ in the unity of the Catholic Church, and of ceasing their support in any way for that movement. Everyone should be aware that formal adherence to the schism is a grave offence against God and carries the penalty of excommunication decreed by the Church's law"
Good work 👍🏻
I stopped watching Church Militant because Michael Voris keeps saying they are in schism. I like CM but this is a deal breaker.
Horner513: Same here. I used to watch them religiously but got really tired of the attacks on the SSPX so I rarely watch them and stopped financial support.
What Church does Michael Voris and his colleagues attend?
@@sweetcaroline2060 I believe he said once but I can't remember.
@@sweetcaroline2060 it’s some church in detroit
Kennedy I love your closing statement!!!!👍🤓😎🙏🙏🙏🙏AMEN to that
Thanks Be To God! The truth needs to be proclaimed boldly and clearly just as this good bishop habitually does. It is astounding that anyone would have the audacity to question this holy bishop who has continually produced good fruit, is in good standing in the Church, corrupt as much of the Roman Curia is in these times.
Thank you! We need all the clarification we can get. 🙏
I wish I had an SSPX near me
Excellent!👏
I met this Holy Bishop when he came to our island a few years ago. I believe him. The only TLM in Tokyo Japan is with the SSPX so I will be going there.
Thanks God for Bishop Schneider
I'd add modernists to that list of enemies of the church.
Great video! I am a big fan and really appreciate your videos. I wish you would name these “key board guys,” you are referring too.
It might be John Salza, he's a proven flip-flop.
Thank Almighty God for this great Shepherd in Christ's Holy Church.
Put it to bed already! The SSPX was NEVER in schism.🌹
Absolutely!
SSPX IS IN SCHISM. It is outside the and not in full communion with the Church. The Popes (JPII, BXVI, and Francis) have been always consistent and clear. Read and heed the Church's highest authority (not the SSPX members, spinners, sympathizers, promoters)
1. Pope Paul VI’s letter to Archbishop Lefebvre on the (schism) withdrawal of canonical recognition from the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) June 29, 1975:
” … Our grief is even greater to note that the decision of the competent authority - although formulated very clearly, and fully justified, it may be said, by your refusal to modify your public and persistent opposition to the Second Vatican Council, to the post-conciliar reforms, and to the orientations to which the Pope himself is committed.
” Finally, the conclusions which [the Commission of Cardinals] proposed to Us, We made all and each of them Ours, and We personally ordered that they be immediately put into force.”
Source: PAUL VI, “Lettre de S. S. Le Pape Paul VI a Mgr. Lefebvre,” 29 June 1975, La Documentation Catholique, n. 1689, trans. in M. DAVIES, Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre, p. 113.
2. Pope St. John Paul II on SSPX schism in his Ecclesia Dei Adflicta, February 7, 1988:
” In the present circumstances I wish especially to make an appeal both solemn and heartfelt, paternal and fraternal, to all those who until now have been linked in various ways to the movement of Archbishop Lefebvre, that they may fulfil the grave duty of remaining united to the Vicar of Christ in the unity of the Catholic Church, and of CEASING THEIR SUPPORT IN ANY WAY FOR THAT MOVEMENT. Everyone should be aware that formal ADHERENCE TO THE SCHISM IS A GRAVE OFFENCE AGAINST GOD and carries the penalty of excommunication decreed by the Church’s law.”
www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/motu_proprio/documents/hf_jp-ii_motu-proprio_02071988_ecclesia-dei.html
3. Pope Benedict XVI in his Letter to the Bishops dated March 10, 2009::
“The fact that the Society of Saint Pius X does not possess a canonical status in the Church is not, in the end, based on disciplinary but on doctrinal reasons. As long as the Society does not have a canonical status in the Church, its ministers do not exercise legitimate ministries in the Church.
“In order to make this clear once again: UNTIL THE DOCTRINAL QUESTIONS ARE CLARIFIED, THE SOCIETY HAS NO CANONICAL STATUS IN THE CHURCH, and its ministers - even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty - do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church…
“This will make it clear that the problems now to be addressed are essentially DOCTRINAL in nature and concern primarily THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL AND THE POST-CONCILIAR MAGISTERIUM OF THE POPES.
“The Church’s teaching authority cannot be frozen in the year 1962 - this must be quite clear to the Society.
www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/letters/2009/documents/hf_ben-xvi_let_20090310_remissione-scomunica.html
4. Pope Francis did give SSPX the faculty to hear confessions legally and validly, because it does not contradict Canon Law. There have always been exceptional circumstances or instances of necessity in which the Church recognizes as valid and licit the reception of sacraments from priests who may be immoral, schismatic, irreligious, laicized, or even non-Catholic, provided their denominations have sacramental confessions.
Canon 844 §2. Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or of indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.
Canon 976 Even though a priest lacks the faculty to hear confessions, he absolves validly and licitly any penitents whatsoever in danger of death from any censures and sins, even if an approved priest is present.
While Pope Francis’ gesture of mercy shows an important precedent - for the good of souls, the Church has the power to grant faculties even to priests who are not in good standing - it is nevertheless NOT AN APPROVAL OF THEM - not an approval of SSPX, or their situation.
5. Pope Francis in his letter Misericordia et Misera, November 20, 2916: “For the pastoral benefit of these faithful (who attend churches officiated by the SSPX ) and trusting in the good will of their priests to strive with God’s HELP FOR THE RECOVERY OF FULL COMMUNION IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, I have personally decided to extend this faculty beyond the Jubilee Year, until further provisions are made, lest anyone be deprived of the sacramental sign of reconciliation through the Church’s pardon.”
www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_letters/documents/papa-francesco-lettera-ap_20161120_misericordia-et-misera.html
Very clearly, Pope Francis’ motu proprio shows there is still the need for SSPX “to recover full communion in the Catholic Church.” Therefore, Pope Benedict’s statement on SSPX’s non-canonical status in the Church still stands.
6. Pope Francis’ letter, dated July 16, 2021, that accompanies Traditionis Custodes, specifically mentioning SSPX to be in “schism.” Here’s the 2nd paragraph, fully quoted:
“Most people understand the motives that prompted St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI to allow the use of the Roman Missal, promulgated by St. Pius V and edited by St. John XXIII in 1962, for the Eucharistic Sacrifice. The faculty - granted by the indult of the Congregation for Divine Worship in 1984 and confirmed by St. John Paul II in the Motu Proprio Ecclesia Dei in 1988 - was above all MOTIVATED BY THE DESIRE TO FOSTER THE HEALING OF THE SCHISM WITH THE MOVEMENT OF MONS. LEFEBVRE. With the ecclesial intention of restoring the unity of the Church, the Bishops were thus asked to accept with generosity the “just aspirations” of the faithful who requested the use of that Missal.”
www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/20210716-motu-proprio-traditionis-custodes.html
7. About the SSPX faculty to officiate in Catholic weddings (Letter from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith dated March 27, 2017). It states that with the diocese’s permission, an SSPX priest may officiate in a Catholic wedding but only if there is no diocesan or religious priest available, and the documents must be forwarded to the diocesan curia. It should be remembered, too, that in the sacrament of matrimony, the ministers are the couple themselves. A priest is only there to witness for the Church and receive the couple’s consent.
Other than those limited faculties, the sacraments of the SSPX, although valid, are not recognized by the Church because, as Pope Benedict XVI writes, the Society has no canonical status and no legitimate ministry in the Church.
8. Many people, including bishops, who say SSPX is not in schism or has reconciled with the Church, should be able to produce a document similar to Pope John Paul II’s letter welcoming the SSPX in Campos, Brazil (now the Union of St. John Mary Vianney) into the fold, otherwise they should not be believed. Here’s the link to Pope JPII letter:
www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=4141
Well said amigo! Thank you for this.
You got me so confused ...i will research this ....thanks . Sending light out of Africa xx
Only found this channel, already love it. Godbless
Hmmm 🤔 it make more sense to me now thanks Kennedy for that explanation. I can better defend SSPX (I'll pray more for those people)
SSPX respects the Holy See and prays for church leadership too. As Kennedy spoke about here in this good video. great to see this Thank you.
Could you please have a formal debate with John Salza on the SSPX, I have been bouncing backwards and forwards on whether I should attend or seek to attend their services. Lately Salza, Lofton and EMJ have been having the upper hand and it now seems the SSPX services are not legitimate but I used to attend SSPX exclusively and I am open to being persuaded otherwise so please! This needs to be made clear!
Why won't John Salza debate Br Peter Dimond?
We joined the SSPX in 2020 when the Canadian Catholic Bishops told all priests they cannot administer the Eucharist on the tongue. The FSSP priests were the only ones getting Communion for a year at FSSP Masses!!! Our beautiful SSPX priests were ensuring the faithful were getting the Sacraments….all of the Sacraments. They know their duty and what is important. The Mass is key and the faithful need proper shepherding. As Fr Altman says, “Shame on the Bishops that closed churches to the faithful and denied them the sacraments!” The SSPX did not. Satan is persecuting the SSPX because they stand for Christ and His church.
Ahh, Mr Kennedy! Well played good sir. We in the church have bigger fish to fry then to go after those who are simply being timelessly catholic.
Awesome!!! Now, what if my local bishop states that SSPX is not allowed to operate in his diocese…?
And that the faithful are not to attend?
If a TLM is not available in an area, then the laity has a choice of attending a diocesan Mass or move to an area where the TLM is offered.
I attend anyway. If my local bishop doesn't want me going to the SSPX, he needs to bring back confession before Mass on Sundays. My local diocesan parish is just as cumbersome to get to as the nearest SSPX and it's difficult for me to get to confession during the week, so if my choice is between diocesan Mass and abstaining from communion vs SSPX Mass and being able to go to confession beforehand and receive holy communion, my choice is obvious. Obedience to a bishop is for the purpose of ultimately serving God, so if an order from a bishop impedes that, I do not follow it. What sort of directive from a bishop should entail restricting access to the sacraments? One that should not be obeyed, that's what. When diocesan bishops closed down Masses during the plandemic, the SSPX in many places were the only ones refusing to shut down, because the sacraments are not up for debate or compromise. They are the definition of essential.
@@annemary9680 Hmm, best reply yet. Viva Cristo Rey❤️🔥 There is confession weekly at one NO parish nearby, and before mass by request at another, currently, I travel 4hrs round trip to the FSSP, however, the SSPX chapel is only 2 hours round trip.
I joined SSPX face book page just recently and why some of their members attacking Dr. Taylor Marcial? I’m also new in attending Latin Mass that’s I’m still learning and also renewing my catholic faith😊
I met the holy bishop recently and was so impressed by his holiness and love for the flock. Also, in listening to Archbishop Lefebvre book for confused Catholics he speaks as a holy man.
The SSPX is saving the Catholic Church and although I go to a Christ the King old Mass the SSPX is nearby and there flourishing, loaded with children and young parents. The SSPX is alive.
Thank you Archbishop Athanasius!
I like Kennedy’s channel. He’s very thoughtful and reasonable. I like CM too. They do a lot of good work exposing the corruption.
I like my NO parish as it is does it’s best to be reverent, kneeling at a communion rail, alter boys, perpetual adoration chapel, attending to the poor. Etc. they try hard to remain faithful to our Lord and his church.
I also love the TLM and try to go the first Sunday of the month to our basilica for the high mass. I wish we will all someday go back.
I love archbishop Schneider and i’m a member of his our lady of Fatima confraternity.
I love father mark goring in Canada. A very saintly priest. I’d love to have a beer with him and pray a rosary with him.
My point is, I love and pray for all of us out there of good will truly searching through all of the mess in the world today, trying to make sense of it all and remaining faithful to our Lord.
We need to pray and love each other and stay close to Our Lady, the star of the sea, so we all make it safely home. Love your families and smile at people and see Jesus in all.
God bless and good night.
I share all you sentiments. Well said
Thank you! VERY IMPORTANT according to canon law, written in 1917!!
Excellent!
No more listening to Trad Lofton, k people?
Lofton is a faith hopper. Currently he is where he is, but for how long? Not a reliable source if you ask me.
In a discussion with Catholics I met on a holiday recently I was astonished at the thinking of these people. Both were older than me which meant they were adult when the Mass was changed. Yet these people were totally against the Tridentine Mass. one said that was abolished by Vatican11. I asked so the Church was wrong for almost 2,000 years . My impression is that these people dont think just like what happened in the 1960's they follow blindly. Words of Scripture "You do not listen and I will throw you out. " Same lot in the 1960's couldn't do 10 times tables.
Liked and shared
So then does it follow that you can to go to their Masses and other sacraments at any time even if other valid Masses are available? Because I thought there was some prelate who said you could only go if you had no other option....which doesn't really make sense to me.
Thank you
Thank you for sharing his view. Michael Davies is worth reading and listening to on this point!
Algorithm boost!
BOOOOOOST!
Well said. The SSPX is focused on the salvation of souls.
Agree Bishop
Thank you for truth. Truth is a rare commodity, these days. Most interestingly, Pilot himself could not perceive it’s definition. Those who overlook the word iniquity, May want to open their Douay Rheims bible, and turn to St. Matthew chapter 7: verse 23. They should begin reading in verse 21, where Jesus states, “Not every one that saith to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven:”
Somebody tell Voris.
Excellent common sense comments Kennedy!
Our Lady of La Salette, pray for us! Our Lady of Buen Suceso, pray for us! Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us! Our Lady of Guadalupe, pray for us!
How can the original Catholic tradition Latin liturgy be anything but Catholic?
It needs to be spelled out though because many are somehow still confused. Perhaps because of top leadership confusion in how it's been banned with the attempt to push tradition out. But without the SSPX would we even have a remnant of traditional Catholics left??
I am very confused. I found the beautiful timeless Latin Mass after mass of the ages documentary. What is the difference in attending the Latin mass at local parish Roman Catholic and one at SSPX? also the SSPX website has a video where a priest tells you not to go to NO, but I thought NO was also a valid mass….i attend daily mass which is NO and Latin mass on Sundays
The SSPX and the Novus Ordo are two churches that are worlds apart. The SSPX is the Council of Trent Church... a Dogmatic Council. The Novus Ordo church is the Vatican II church... a Pastoral Council. The SSPX represents what Jesus Christ Divinely instituted. The Novus Ordo represents the Church that Vatican II instituted... the church of man.
One instituted by the Creator... the SSPX.
The other instituted by a hijacked Council.
One given by God to man, the other forced by man upon God. No legalistic explanation can justify a merger between Truth and falsehood.
People like Card Burke are ignorant or wolves dressed in sheep's clothing, because he never tires of saying that the SSPX is systematic. God enlighten them. Thank you Mr Kennedy
A Priest saying Mass prays for his Bishop by saying "Antistite nostro Aloysio" (or whatever name he is); a Bishop says "et me indigno servo tuo".
Yes .
Please do an interview w/ Bro. Peter Dimond. I'm not a sede but find some of what he has to say fascinating despite him being so controversial. In light of his recent debate I think a lot of people have a newfound respect for him and his convictions even though most do not agree w/ them and I find his zealousness and frankness inspiring despite what I believe to be his errors. I'm not asking for a debate but a simple informal interview. That would be awesome. I loved his older phone call debates w/ protestant ministers. LOL! I wish he would go more in that direction.
I agree
Ad majorem Dei gloriam!!!
🙏🏻🕊❤️🔥+Wonderful!+❤️🔥🕊🙏🏻
I have become convinced that the SSPX is not in schism. I am however concerned about the high rate of sexual abuse and impropriety in the society, presented by Church Militant. Could you possibly do a program dedicated to this topic?
I have the same
Bishop Schneider for Pope
4:33 "Why are people doing their best continuously to fibd a way-to find a reason-why they shouldn't have a fraternal union with those who attend the SSPX and accept the priests as simply catholic?"
Pride and malice.
I thought Pope Benedict said, " The Society of Pius X were not schismatic "!
The current Pope has increased their faculties with regard to confession and The Sacrament of Marriage, which, as a sacrament has to include Mass and Holy Communion.
Also the current Pope as far as I understand it has never declared The society to be in schism. If he has not declared them to be in schism then they are not! Full stop! Everyone else who says they are are wrong.
Still thank you and thank the Holy Bishop. It is good to tell those who are still in journey of learning ordinary things of the faith so they can understand what is at stake but for me and somany others we do not care. I always deep down my heart pray for our Holy Father Papa Francis and the Holy Catholic and Apostolic church the new arch of salvation of which outside of it there is no salvation to continue to teach the world the way to heaven to see our LORD JESUS CHRIST in HIS glory
Conservative Confessional Lutherans separated from the liberal Lutheran churches years ago.
Please let us keep 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏 for the Holy Priests working so hard to keep teaching the Truth,Way, Light of OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST,,,,, God bless U all with SANCTITY,,,, 🕯️🙏✝️🙏🔥🕊️
Keyboard warriors... without them, where would we be?! I believe all the saints had at least a smartphone if not personal laptop
So where does authority lie then? As a lay Catholic I do not know who to trust if not the authority of the teaching office of the Church. Everyman for himself or what)
🎯
I refer to Michael Voris as Platinum Mike.
GOD IS GOOD ❤
So sick of hearing the holier than thous accusing everyone of schism. It's scriptural: Mark 9:40 For he that is not against you is for you.
Yes Canon Law and Divine Law
Now explain the SSPX ...Society of St Pius ?
I apologize, but would someone tell me who the referenced keyboard warrior (warriors) is/are? I am trying to catch-up on the issues. Just came back to the church about two years ago Thanks.
Keyboard Warriors is an unkind euphemism for men on the Internet who want to bully and badger others for certain things. I really don’t think we should be engaging with their juvenile arguments because they are simply that. Juvenile and short-sighted! If SSPX was nearby, I might go to see what it was like myself, but I am thankful for the Diocesan liturgy all the same especially since it is Canon’s Regular.
@@MissPopuri Thank you for the explanation. Going to a Latin mass this weekend. Haven't been to one since I was a little girl. My sister, former president of CCW in our church is going to talk with the parish priest to see if we can bring back at least one Latin mass a week, hopefully one of the Sunday masses. Thanks again.
At risk of giving them scandalized airtime, they would be in no particular order, Voris, Salza, Lofton, Coffin, Bartel, on occasion Paleocrat...
@@muztan3100 name dropping is very poorly done; it is akin to doxxing someone for a hate raid.
@@muztan3100 A good list of those guilty in various degrees. Having heard their individual screeds, my respect and support for the mission and purpose of the SSPX remains rooted and lodged. Father Z believes that the SSPX will not only prevail, but continue to flourish. Why? His evidence was a video which showed an SSPX priest stationed in Oregon, who routinely jets up to Anchorage, Alaska, who then boards a small plane to offer Holy Mass and offer the Sacrements to traditional Catholics in far flung, remote areas in the state. I have personally attended a Mass said by this very priest, who conducted the Sacrifice with utmost solemnity and was serious in his demeanor. While not all SSPX priests are of his caliber, one can see how a few like him will keep the light burning for traditional Catholicism. Remember what the devil told the Cure d'Ars, about what just a few good, holy and strong priests could do.
Don’t die your beard. Grey is awesome.
How ironic, traditional catholics being called schismatic. When the catholic church splits for the 3rd time, which one will be the 'one true church'?
I see the light of Jesus in both of you.
Calling out Michael Voris and the Church Militant to stop attacking the SSPX. Either you are with Christ or you are not. In this case, you attack SSPX, you attack Christ!
All Canceled Priests - join the SSPX! It is why Archbishop established it.
Perhaps him and Burke can get on the same page. Who do we believe
Didn't Jesus say if you have something against your brother, do not think you should be in union with Him at Holy Mass until you first resolve your difference with your brother. While I am paraphrasing in the above, does it not seem wrong to judge fellow Catholics who are in all sincerity following traditions which were handed down for centuries with papal approval.
Abp LeFebvre Santo Subito
Amen!!!
Here is a prayer, approved by their former Superior General, for that very purpose! ruclips.net/video/Qo0KP2qEcIo/видео.html
Mr. flip flop keyboard warrior. 👏🏻😂👏🏻
Who is mr flip flop ?
church militant has left the chat
John Salza, Michael Lofton, Andrew Bartell, Gordon Brothers have left…
Deleted my comment?!
Jesus was not a scribe, or Pharisee; nor a Sadducee, or Essene. He was doubly of David’s line through Mary and Joseph, but did not belong to a priestly family (like Zechariah did). He was trained by Joseph as a rural general contractor, and wasn’t not highly educated in Jerusalem, nor even trained as a village rabbi.
However, He WAS the Word Incarnate; the Only-Begotten Son of the Father from all eternity; the promised Messiah/ Christ to Israel & the gentiles; God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God; the Lamb of God who taketh away the sins of the world.