It's the same actor Joseph Egger he played coffin maker Piripero in Fistful Of Dollars and For Few Dollars More he played a different character known as The Old Prophet. Joseph Egger died in 1966 shortly after For A Few Dollars More was released
guilherme bezerra it’s same actor he played Piperio the coffin maker in A Fistful Of Dollars and was credited old prophet in For A Few Dollars More played two different characters. Joseph Egger died in 1966.
@@m42037 what are you asking how the actor died? Joesph Egger was already in his mid 70s when made A Fistful Of Dollars and For A Few Dollars More and was 77 when he died in 66 but his death is listed as undisclosed
He was a comedian in his day and known for doing tricks with his beard unfortunately he passed away after the release of For A Few Dollars More at age 77.
I dunno. Clint's look at 0:35 takes my vote. I can't tell if it's good acting or no acting, but I tend to think the latter. A smile of bemusement seems very out-of-character.
Every scene in this movie is inventive and interesting. It's a great lesson in being imaginative and open ideas. The point of the scene is for Eastwood to learn who the mysterious cowboy in black is. That could be achieved in a million different ways yet they chose to build a specific set and have a crazy old man talk about trains. What could have been a dry exchange of information became this memorable and funny scene, with nothing in the plot pointing towards it being this way.
Not one mm of wasted celluloid in the entire trilogy. Every second is entertaining in some way. Comic, thrilling, brilliantly acted by stars and extras, artistic cinematography, fantastic score. Epic.
The Old man was played by character actor Joesph Egger his character is known as The Old Prophet who tells Clints character Manco about Colonel Mortimer. The Prophet in a way is like someone who knows things about everybody, Manco uses him to find out information. Joseph Egger is a character actor and his role was small supporting role. The actor died in 1966 after this movie was released . Clint Eastwood is the lead actor
The man with no name or Manco as he is called played by Clint Eastwood is the star of the movie and is Bounty Hunter who gets paid to track murderers and rapists and turns them in or kills them for a reward as did that back in old West in real life in 1800s
the wife and i use this constantly...putting in things like "it was the DAMN TACOS, DAMN EM!!" "it was the DAMN NEIGHBORS, DAMN EM!!" it never stops being funny to us xD
That is fantastic. If you're going to ~complain, ~satirizing it *as you're doing it,* is a great way to go. And, this is a phenomenal choice to base what is effectively a sort of self-satirization around. Something simple like this suggests a lot, to me / IMO, about you and your wife and your marriage. Much more than "grand" gestures, fancy material objects, etc. Kudos and best wishes to you both! _(Also, I'm stealing what y'all are doing.)_ 😉
That old guy keep saying damn trains keep reminding me of Big Smoke from Grand Theft Auto San Andreas.well at least Clint Eastwoid didnt need to is to follow the dam trains CJ.
2:28 *biggest AH HA moment in the film!!!* 2:52 *this scene kinda grabbed ya, too! didn't totally understand what the old geiser was trying to say about trains "reducing" gunfighters to bounty killers, tho.....maybe someone can elaborate??*
He's talking about _soldiers_ being "reduced" to being "bounty killers". On the one hand, it's not clear that there is a difference between, say, "soldier", "mercenary", "bounty killer", etc., defined _purely_ in those terms, at least. On the other hand, _traditionally,_ an occupation like "soldier" is often considered honorable, "noble", respectable, etc., by many who would (tend to) consider similar occupations defined more directly / purely by economic considerations to be far less respectable (or even 'base' or 'vulgar' or etc.). I would say that there is a tendency towards attracting more 'disreputable' people and towards more dishonorable, destructive, corrupt, sometimes even monstrous, and almost always ultimately _stupid_ (in the sense defined by the economist Carlo Cipolla) behavior whenever _any_ ('work') activity is based excessively on "economic" considerations - particularly, the more simply and self-servingly such considerations are factored into motivation. I.e., if I were to base my "economic" activities solely on $ (say) in my wallet after some event vs. before ("net personal $"), then I open the door to _doing anything_ that strikes my mind as being likely to result in some positive (personal) net outcome - some net gain. E.g., I might kill another person just to take any money they happen to have in their wallet (and, I might not even take anything else ... very "wasteful" on top of it). Even a gain of $5, say, might be considered "success". Anyway, obviously there are specifics I'm omitting to focus on the simplest (generally quite impractical, currently) example(s) getting at the fundamentals of the underlying philosophy / philosophical problems with certain potential "value systems" related to the differences, both in theory (views of people, generally) and practice (actual harms to individuals, groups, etc.), between some of these occupations based around killing. In reality and historically, I'd personally suggest that terms like "soldier" and "mercenary" are _at best_ proxies for "virtuous" vs. "vicious" behavior. And, further, that even "virtuous" vs. "vicious" is at _least_ a spectrum and often dependent on perspective as well. That isn't to say there aren't plenty of quite egregious _clear_ violations of some of the most fundamental principles any _human_ (to be considered as such) should adhere to - particularly the "Golden Rule". But, there are far more scenarios where things are far more "gray" (subject to perspective, lying on some spectrum or within some spectra, etc.) - something that these movies tended to excel at portraying, in particular.
North Carolina? Both Mark and Michael? Robinson and Whatley. The latter reading his lines as written supposedly Rheumy Eyes' interests?. North Carolina. A family resemblance colonel Mortimer and the two watches with Morricone themes. 60 seconds to What Lee? The Carolinas. South Carolina Lindsey Tim and Nikki. Now The North star. Is that Art Pope's country still?
Only one of these two actors are in the “GOOD “. A Fistful of Dollars the “GREAT “ For a Few Dollar s More. The “GREATEST “ Once Upon a Time in the West. and. “The all Time Greatest” The Good The Bad and the Ugly” and it wasn’t Clint Eastwood
Damn if you aren’t right there’s two of them things Joseph Eggar and Joseph Bradley Jesus where did Sergio Leone find them I almost would have bet my life they were the same person Thanks for straightening me out
That's the Austrian actor Josef Eggar who played the coffin maker Piripero in A Fistful Of Dollars.
It's the same actor Joseph Egger he played coffin maker Piripero in Fistful Of Dollars and For Few Dollars More he played a different character known as The Old Prophet. Joseph Egger died in 1966 shortly after For A Few Dollars More was released
guilherme bezerra it’s same actor he played Piperio the coffin maker in A Fistful Of Dollars and was credited old prophet in For A Few Dollars More played two different characters. Joseph Egger died in 1966.
This was his last part in a movie.
@@scottknode898 How?
@@m42037 what are you asking how the actor died? Joesph Egger was already in his mid 70s when made A Fistful Of Dollars and For A Few Dollars More and was 77 when he died in 66 but his death is listed as undisclosed
My dad loves Clint Eastwood’s movies and I love this part so much. 😂😂😂😂
Love this scene 😊 the look on clints face as he stands up. Thats priceless.
Dellacondan +Clint trying so hard not to crack up laughing !
I love that Clint's reaction at 1:58
Best reaction in a film.
A great soldier, a brave soldier, a man of wisdom and integrity a man who still carries his honour/.
A real soldier can lose anything, even his own life, but he can not stand to lose his dignity.
Even the simple scenes in this movie are great.
I always loved how his beard moved on his chin lol
+blockmasterscott He has no teeth and no dentures too, that's why he could move his beard like that :)
He was a comedian besides being an actor in his day and did tricks with his beard.
He was a comedian in his day and known for doing tricks with his beard unfortunately he passed away after the release of For A Few Dollars More at age 77.
Yep, reminds me of Popeye lol.
Scenes, actors, and dialogue like this are why this one is my favorite by far. Thanks for cutting up and sharing.
I love this Yoda-ass prospector prophet
Damn trains. They ruined everything.
I didn't come to this comment section to hear you rattle on about trains.
Disgusting damn trains, damn 'em!
Great.its big smoke.suffering trainsyndrom.
That look Clint gives him at 2:00 cracks me up .
Paul Howard It is. It cracks me up every time and , like most fans, I've seen it many times.
They both at 1:58. What great actors eh?
I dunno. Clint's look at 0:35 takes my vote. I can't tell if it's good acting or no acting, but I tend to think the latter.
A smile of bemusement seems very out-of-character.
Clint was definitely like "I am so done with this old man", it's like the look of someone who's just had enough! XD
Clint tryin hard not to laff !
That's me my apartment is next to a railway track's, He's right dam train's 🤣
Every scene in this movie is inventive and interesting. It's a great lesson in being imaginative and open ideas. The point of the scene is for Eastwood to learn who the mysterious cowboy in black is. That could be achieved in a million different ways yet they chose to build a specific set and have a crazy old man talk about trains. What could have been a dry exchange of information became this memorable and funny scene, with nothing in the plot pointing towards it being this way.
Yeah well said
It's like it's so abstract it's almost like an outtake. But of course it's a very important scene.
You mean like every scene is a thought through, well imagined work of art. Remember those days, Hollywood?
This trilogy is a dream in film format
I love when the train goes back how Clint is just shaking in his chair while lighting his cigar lol
Not one mm of wasted celluloid in the entire trilogy. Every second is entertaining in some way. Comic, thrilling, brilliantly acted by stars and extras, artistic cinematography, fantastic score. Epic.
I laughed so hard I almost peed my pants.
I thought that "house" was going to fall apart with Clint inside.
I love when the whole house is shaking and Clint just sits there. lol
I love this scene. Like when Clint is trying to light his cigar and his hand is shaking from the train. 😆
The old actor was born in 1889, just 25 years after the American Civil War had ended.
A perfect example of Sergio Leone’s sense of humor he made the prophet the train ticket taker at the beginning of Once Upon A Time in the West
Verdade, onde um bandido arranca os fios do telégrafo, não queria barulho nenhum
XD this scene is the best! I love that guy!
seven souls didn't like this... Because of trains! Because of the damn trains!! Damn 'em! ptou!!!
Incredible acting by the old man, you'll never see anything like that these days.
+V You should see the italian dub supervised by Sergio Leone himself. Bets verison.
what's the story with this guy? is he the star of the picture? the name of the man with no name is manco.
The Old man was played by character actor Joesph Egger his character is known as The Old Prophet who tells Clints character Manco about Colonel Mortimer. The Prophet in a way is like someone who knows things about everybody, Manco uses him to find out information. Joseph Egger is a character actor and his role was small supporting role. The actor died in 1966 after this movie was released . Clint Eastwood is the lead actor
The man with no name or Manco as he is called played by Clint Eastwood is the star of the movie and is Bounty Hunter who gets paid to track murderers and rapists and turns them in or kills them for a reward as did that back in old West in real life in 1800s
@@bablubablu-co3pb No this is Twitter not a free movie
1:15-1:30 I laughed my ass off with this bit
this old guy was born when the wild west was a thing
this scene is what makes this movie valuable
0:34 Clint Eastwood trying not to laugh
Yup!
the wife and i use this constantly...putting in things like "it was the DAMN TACOS, DAMN EM!!" "it was the DAMN NEIGHBORS, DAMN EM!!"
it never stops being funny to us xD
Lmao
That is fantastic.
If you're going to ~complain, ~satirizing it *as you're doing it,* is a great way to go. And, this is a phenomenal choice to base what is effectively a sort of self-satirization around.
Something simple like this suggests a lot, to me / IMO, about you and your wife and your marriage. Much more than "grand" gestures, fancy material objects, etc. Kudos and best wishes to you both!
_(Also, I'm stealing what y'all are doing.)_ 😉
Great scene but every scenes of this western is fantastic
Clint trying to keep a straight face 1:40
This scene reminds me so much of the empire strikes back with Yoda.
I've always loved this scene.
Robin Williams was amazing in this role!
Robin williams?
This is the greatest scene in movie history
Funniest scene in the movie in my opinion, just an old man complaining about trains causing disturbance 😁
One of my favourite scenes, haha! XD
Nothing funnier than an old man losing his temper because of the DAMN TRAINS!
The train, nothing but a gateway contraption!
1:57 that grand torino look
Best clip from the movie.😂
Because of the damn trains! Damn 'em!!
Scene makes me laugh!
I agree with the Old buzzard. Goddamn the trains!
Those damn trains!
the ending: POOH! haha.
The oldman man remind me of Robin Williams in The Fisher King!
And it's all because of them trains.
Why do I always laugh so hard at 0:06?
you can clear my "HOUSE" before I loose my temper.
It's lose not loose.
He kinda made me hate them damned trains too. 😳😖
This old man is the western equivalent of empire strikes back yoda……
heeeey where are you going, hmmm?
Classic stuff!.. I love that old material!👍👍
As subtle as Phillip Seymour Hoffman.
That old guy keep saying damn trains keep reminding me of Big Smoke from Grand Theft Auto San Andreas.well at least Clint Eastwoid didnt need to is to follow the dam trains CJ.
Yosemite Sam come to life!
all that carbon monoxide coming into his house and steam and smoke..lol and all the crap falling down..lol..
Hey where ya going??? ... guess I better leave before you go n lose your temper... Lmao. great Scene.
same acting in once upon time in the west
Love it :O
........*spits* Bravo....
Good one
thedamtrainsdamnum!
Pointing to the prophet is me I’m under lords instruction by seeing that’s it
Lmao
Bakers eh? Wasn't that the farm in 'Once upon a time in the west'
Is this guy also in the intro to once upon a Time in the west?
The oldmans voice was dubbed in English.
2:28 *biggest AH HA moment in the film!!!* 2:52 *this scene kinda grabbed ya, too! didn't totally understand what the old geiser was trying to say about trains "reducing" gunfighters to bounty killers, tho.....maybe someone can elaborate??*
He's talking about _soldiers_ being "reduced" to being "bounty killers".
On the one hand, it's not clear that there is a difference between, say, "soldier", "mercenary", "bounty killer", etc., defined _purely_ in those terms, at least. On the other hand, _traditionally,_ an occupation like "soldier" is often considered honorable, "noble", respectable, etc., by many who would (tend to) consider similar occupations defined more directly / purely by economic considerations to be far less respectable (or even 'base' or 'vulgar' or etc.).
I would say that there is a tendency towards attracting more 'disreputable' people and towards more dishonorable, destructive, corrupt, sometimes even monstrous, and almost always ultimately _stupid_ (in the sense defined by the economist Carlo Cipolla) behavior whenever _any_ ('work') activity is based excessively on "economic" considerations - particularly, the more simply and self-servingly such considerations are factored into motivation. I.e., if I were to base my "economic" activities solely on $ (say) in my wallet after some event vs. before ("net personal $"), then I open the door to _doing anything_ that strikes my mind as being likely to result in some positive (personal) net outcome - some net gain. E.g., I might kill another person just to take any money they happen to have in their wallet (and, I might not even take anything else ... very "wasteful" on top of it). Even a gain of $5, say, might be considered "success".
Anyway, obviously there are specifics I'm omitting to focus on the simplest (generally quite impractical, currently) example(s) getting at the fundamentals of the underlying philosophy / philosophical problems with certain potential "value systems" related to the differences, both in theory (views of people, generally) and practice (actual harms to individuals, groups, etc.), between some of these occupations based around killing.
In reality and historically, I'd personally suggest that terms like "soldier" and "mercenary" are _at best_ proxies for "virtuous" vs. "vicious" behavior. And, further, that even "virtuous" vs. "vicious" is at _least_ a spectrum and often dependent on perspective as well. That isn't to say there aren't plenty of quite egregious _clear_ violations of some of the most fundamental principles any _human_ (to be considered as such) should adhere to - particularly the "Golden Rule". But, there are far more scenarios where things are far more "gray" (subject to perspective, lying on some spectrum or within some spectra, etc.) - something that these movies tended to excel at portraying, in particular.
How does he's able to move his mouth like that? 01:00 :))))))))
No teeth or dentures.
@@Cinerary Poor guy :(
I didn't come here to see you converse with an invisible chair, old man!
crazy old man.
0:01 no no no!
North Carolina? Both Mark and Michael? Robinson and Whatley. The latter reading his lines as written supposedly Rheumy Eyes' interests?. North Carolina. A family resemblance colonel Mortimer and the two watches with Morricone themes. 60 seconds to What Lee? The Carolinas. South Carolina Lindsey Tim and Nikki. Now The North star. Is that Art Pope's country still?
CJ's ancestor ?
More like Big Smoke ancestor.
XD
Listen
22 23, you were supposed to be a profit!
Clint’s got question I’ll answer for him (me)
Only one of these two actors are in the “GOOD “. A Fistful of Dollars the “GREAT “ For a Few Dollar s More. The “GREATEST “ Once Upon a Time in the West. and. “The all Time Greatest” The Good The Bad and the Ugly” and it wasn’t Clint Eastwood
Excellent scene and talking. Old man is always near the train in western movies yes all movies he steals the show and makes a great movie.
Wasn't Joseph Egger either. So.........?
The “prophet” IS OR WAS Josef Eggar
@@alanwise2996 But he wasn't in all those movies. He was dead before at least one of them was made.
Damn if you aren’t right there’s two of them things Joseph Eggar and Joseph Bradley Jesus where did Sergio Leone find them I almost would have bet my life they were the same person Thanks for straightening me out
Is this robin williams?
0:28
Camera to me
b4 I lose my killed it
comedia
better in italian...
Jokes on u
This guy has a boneless chin lmao