How come we have telescopes that can see galaxies light years away, but we can't magnify enough to see a flag on the moon that is only 100,000's of miles away?
Because galaxies, although way further away they, are also extremely big (it takes light more then 100 years to travel from one side of the galaxy to the other).. and in Comparison to that the flag is extremely tiny. Also the galaxies emit a lot of light because of all the stars in them, the flag does not. But the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) actually gave us pictures of the flag while it was orbiting the moon.
Exactly were able to see millions of galaxy's and another planet behind Pluto but we cant see what's on the moon that's in our backyard and all this technology now days yet they plan a trip to Mars it's all.a hoax and it was all mind control 👎
jim cherkas nah with the resources they need in this case and the money they have they needed extra help and that’s a reason they collaborate with SpaceX
Cope and seethe. How dare you put down those men who risked their lives to ensure the future. If we didn't go to the moon, a lot of the stuff today would not exist.
@@niteexplorer9934You can look it up... Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Even Japan, India, and China took photos of the moon on which you could see the apollo landing sites.
I can guarantee you the rover is up there and all the metal things, but I doubt the flags have survived all the wear and tear from micrometeorite strikes and ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
@@AntonioAugusto1010 you asked me to prove that the flags are still on the moon. there are pictures of the flags and of the other gear that they had from a lunar orbiter
@@dalepress1581 Everything on the internet isn't reliable information. That's why i get my information from government agencies with billions in funding who do actual science.
How about another trip to the moon ? With all the technology over the last 50 years there should be a drive thru Mc Donald's on the moon . Because the government said we were there doesn't mean anything, they lie about a lot of things. At the time of the space program who in government thought we would have more technology in a cell phone than what was used to supposedly send us to the moon . Again we can use a telescope to see stars light years away . Zoom in and show the flags
@@richardbrewin4165 YOU SAID: "How about another trip to the moon ?" == Well, in 2019, congress finally allocated some money to start putting together moon missions again. So, yes, they're working on it. After 1972, congress didn't allocate a single dime for manned moon missions. YOU SAID: "With all the technology over the last 50 years there should be a drive thru Mc Donald's on the moon ." == Do you ACTUALLY believe that? Do you understand anything about thermodynamics? (Obviously not.) Traveling to the moon will never be achievable to common people, never. Why not? Because, no matter what you do, no matter how small or large you can make the craft, or how cheaply, it still takes a certain amount of energy to get to and from the moon. Even if you could reduce all other costs to zero, free rockets, free labor, free launch facilities, free landers, etc., even if all of that stuff costed nothing... sorry, but you'd still have to buy a couple of million pounds of rocket fuel and oxidizer per person. That stuff isn't cheap, you know. The common person will never be able to afford just the fuel and oxidizer, even if all other costs were reduced to zero (which is impossible anyway). YOU SAID: "Because the government said we were there doesn't mean anything, they lie about a lot of things." == Correct. But, nobody I've ever talked to about Apollo believes it because the government ever said anything. It's about understanding the history, the sciences involved, and the evidence. Nobody cares what governments say. YOU SAID: "At the time of the space program who in government thought we would have more technology in a cell phone than what was used to supposedly send us to the moon." == Pfffttt. First of all, Moore's Law was created in 1965. So, yes, it was firmly predicted about what today's computerized technology would be. Secondly, why do you think everything moves at the pace of computer technology? Actually, rapid computer technology advancements are the exception to the rule, not the rule. There really isn't any other type of technology that advances that quickly. Rocket technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Life support technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radio communications technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radar hasn't advanced that quickly. Medical technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radiation shielding technology hasn't advanced that quickly. You can always recognize someone's massive ignorance when they refer to computer or smartphone (which is just a computer) technology as if everything is supposed to advance at the same pace. Sorry, it doesn't. Advancement, sure. Advancement at the pace of Moore's Law, sorry, no. YOU SAID: "Again we can use a telescope to see stars light years away . Zoom in and show the flags" == Good grief. Distance isn't the problem. Angular size is the problem. Go Google "optical resolution" and read the Wiki page. Not that I'd encourage anybody to use Wiki in place of an actual education... but in your case... you need something to snap the stupid out of the stuff you're saying. See, the thing is, you can calculate the size lens you'd need in order to see flags on the lunar surface. The Wiki article gives you the formula. I haven't done the math for a flag, but I've done it for the landers. And, in order to see the lunar landers from Earth in enough detail to recognize them, you'd need a lens a quarter mile across. A flag?? As seen from above?? You're talking about an object just an inch or two thick, as seen from above. I'm not doing the math again for your sake, but, you're easily talking about a lens many miles in diameter. And, guess what, even if you had a lens that big (good luck with that), sorry, but you still couldn't see the flags, because of the Earth's atmospheric distortion. So, again, there are multiple reasons that you're asking for the impossible. Go back to school and learn something before you fling your ignorance around, as if it's some sort of evidence against Apollo... that not a single physicist on Earth has ever realized... oh, but, you did, right? No physicist has ever thought of just looking through a telescope, right? Oh, but you have. Yeah, the entire planet's physicists are all dumb, and you're the smart one. Good grief.
@Daan Daan _i calculated the amount of energy in different types of propulsion fluids and i took the weight of the descending module._ Did you remember to take Moon's gravity into an account? _There is so much power neededso that if this was real the engine had blown a krater in the moondust._ Would it had blown a crater in a moonrock? _It's just impossible. Even with today's technology._ If you find that your admittedly-uninformed personal opinion disagrees with expert consensus on a technical topic, please consider that "All the experts know something I don't" is a more likely explanation than "I alone solved a complex problems expert have long been studying." _the tinfoil that was used for the moonlander_ You mean the thermal blanket? _would never be able to hold the force of a pressurized cabin in a vacuum._ Nobody claims that it did. _The astronauts are inconsistent in their explanations_ No they're not. You just don't seem to understand how the _Apollo_ Lunar Module was actually constructed. _and when people ask how it exactly worked it was suddenly classified._ No it's not. The information you are referring to is still publicly available.
@Daan Daan _Now you would have needed a sixth of that._ You're not landing an _"Apollo_ rocket" on the Moon. You're landing an _Apollo_ Lunar Module on the Moon. It doesn't weight 1/6th of the _Saturn_ V (that's how it's called) rocket weight. It weights *1/185th* of the _Saturn_ V weight. _No I mean the tinfoil_ Again, there was no tinfoil included in the design of the _Apollo_ Lunar Module. This is true even if the Moon landings are fake. _that was ment as structural part of the thermal blanket._ The thermal blanket wasn't meant to be a structural part of the _Apollo_ Lunar Module, and wasn't meant to be pressurized. This is true even if the Moon landings are fake. _The lander was not on a moonrock,_ Yes it was. A moon rock covered with a thin layer of dust. This is true even if that "moon rock" was fake. _Strange enough the feet stayed clean on top._ "Strange" how? In the absence of an atmosphere, there wouldn't be any dust cloud, so there wouldn't be any dust to settle on the top of the landing pads (that's how they're called). In that regard, even if the Moon landings are fake, I'd have to commend NASA for getting this detail _right._ _etc. etc. Do the math yourself._ I did. You're clearly wrong, _objectively so,_ even if the Moon landings _are_ fake. _if you want to believe it_ It's not a matter of belief. It's a matter of understanding the science.
lol however did they manage the van allen belt ? when they did not even know it existed and naturally passing through it both times, enabled the astronauts to live a ripe old age. Ah cmon. The clothing they wore would never stand up to the radiation lol
@@tazwoh2002 can't you search that? And what does it matter? The Mercury Missions didn't go past the belts. Again, what makes you think they can't go through the Van Allen Radiation Belts? What evidence do you have?
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 James Van Allen stated that after tests, that the van allen belts were too dangerous for humans to past through with the technology they had at present in 1958. However Hamilton Standard conneticut stated they did not put any radiation protection in the make up of the suit when man went to the moon. Cosmic radiation would of been deadly for the astronauts "FACT" the van allen tests went 200 miles above earth and as altitiude increased the geiger counter went off the scale and shut down during a test. So 1958 to 1969 Van Allen Belts were deemed deadly, then NASA 1969-1972 Deemed them safe. Which was when the Apollo and Gemini (Not mercury sorry) were taking place. 1972 to date they are deadly again "Strange that" for verification watch this : -ruclips.net/video/hQDTlsN5V24/видео.html
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 also another video - ruclips.net/video/JgXDi7mc43M/видео.html You cant say van allen was wrong and NASA knew this. Has the Russians been to the moon ... NO because they know this also.
I honestly don't understand where all these conspiracy theorists are coming from, but I also don't think the astronauts themselves care whether people believe that they did it or not.
@@diromiz The astronauts didn't look like they gave a stuff whether they went or not in the press conference they gave. It was very troubling watching it.
True!!! The guys hold & running the wired harness....pulled too tight.....and he fell over.......they were trying to simulate what they THINK the gravity on the "moon"....is......but....they have no clue.....funny chit tho!!!!
Get this we can see intense and vivid pictures of Mars, Andromeda, Titian, and the Sun but we can’t see 6 flags on our closets natural satellite. My guess is probably because they aren’t there👀.
Pay for it if you want them to go back. NASA prefers to use their budget for scientific purposes than to spend millions for usless moon landing. We learned what we wanted to learn, no need to go back
@Elite Gamegerous cause he knows it can't be proven. It should be cheap, with just an iPhone and a rocket, but no one that believes we did won't listen to common sense
There would be a McDonalds on the moon by now if the US really went there. Nothing to see here folks, that’s space wind. “It wasn’t wind, the flag was bunched up”
While I have concluded and agree that the flag waving shown in this video are explained by the astronauts holding the flag pole I have here are at least 2 other tapes from various missions showing what appears to be the flag waving without direct contact from the astronauts. (1) ruclips.net/video/HP2IIb1S-xQ/видео.html shows flag movement without astronauts present. Very interesting. (2) ruclips.net/video/ymwE1sNm82Y/видео.html shows flag movement starting from a still position after an astronaut runs by without touching flag. In this sequence I as a scientist can give at least 3 explanations : (A) Static from the astronaut running by. This could be tougher in a vacuum . ( B ) Ground vibration movement transferred to flag as the astronaut runs by. ( C) Movement and displacement of air as the astronaut runs by. Of course here it means a studio on earth if it is true. YOUR THOUGHTS. I AM VERY INTERESTED. ANYONE ?
It's like inertia and gravity doesn't exist on the moon. The flag has a stick supporting the upper side of the flag making it stick horizontal straight btw.
@@DeputyNordburg The Apollo missions probably weren't entirely shot from a hangar. The photos that show the demarcation lines -- those were shot from a hangar.
On the Moon the difference in temperature between shadow and sunlit surfaces is from minus 70 to plus 280 degrees. This is why no man made object can be still in tact after a short time. Needless to say no people ever went there and its very unlikely to ever go.
On Earth if you talk about temperature and don't want to appear foolish you name the units as C or F. The wide range of temperatures on the moon occur over the 650 hour long day/night cycle that most people would not consider "a short time". A pair of silicon oven mits that cost less than 20 bucks can handle a temperature range from -40F to 425F. (they are manmade) The reason no rational people believe the moon landings are a hoax is because you guys put forward this nonsensical conjecture.
There's no ambient temperature in a vacuum and objects will not change temperature instantly. They will SLOWLY absorb heat in sunlight and SLOWLY lose it in shadow. By the way, plus 280 is nowhere close to what firefighting equipment can be designed for. Try 3,000.
@@kevinskinner4986 Mostly correct. Most objects in space are partially exposed to the sun, and partially exposed to the blackness of space. A satellite for example. They gain heat from the sun, but radiate heat away at every angle. And those will normally become very cold overall. An object close to the Earth or moon will of course gain some heat from that celestial body. In either case it's a balance. An object can change it's average temperature based on it's color. Bright white like a spacesuit reflects away most of the sunlight's heat before it becomes absorbed. Black for max heat, silver/grey (like the cameras) for a balance. Turn the object frequently to make the temperature average out... Moon hoax people, I like to call them hoax folks, take the NASA derived max recorded temperature for the moon, and claim that is the temperature everywhere at all times on the sunny side. Which is of course silly. The max temperature is at noon at the equator, and even then is just a surface temperature.
Riddle me this, we cant answer the question if the flag is still there or what it looks like even though we have a 25,000 lb, $2,500,000,000 telescope that's been orbiting at 350 miles since 1990 and is as long as a school bus ?
That's because you don't understand telescopes. Trying to see the flag on the moon is like trying to observe an ant 5km away through a telescope. You ain't going to see the ant!
I have never seen any telescopic evidence of anything we allegedly left behind on the moon. I did hear one NASA scientist say "the moon is to close for our powerful telescopes to focus on". 🙄
Never been to the moon Never been in space Never been in Antarctica Never explored the earth Never measured the earth circumference Never had satellite orbiting earth
Science is based on observation. If you cannot observe the subject of your study, you’re not doing science, but lies. How do you talk of Jupiter, mars, sun, moon, Saturn when you have never been there? Telling me there is water on Mars while you’re here sitting on your couch? Waw!!! If you are so precise with your science from that distance using whatever scanner you have, why just don’t you scan the earth and tell me where all the diamond is so I could go get it?
mizofan ...I agree, They looked confused and guilty about the answers they were giving, If I just got back from the moon and being the first one.. you couldn’t keep me quiet, I’d wouldn’t be able to contain my excitement.
@@DeputyNordburg another person asked buzz to swear on the Bible that he really went to the moon and he wouldn't do it, and punched the guy in the face
Could you imagine being God and watching all of this? Watching humans try to make an airplane make eventually succeeding and then watching them build rockets and eventually going to the Moon.... Imagine.... I can just imagine God looking down like , "Wow they're going to the Moon now" I wonder why God hasn't destroyed the Earth with all the evil things going on and then I think of this. Maybe he thinks that the good outweighs the bad?? Its kind of crazy because just 100 years ago we couldn't even communicate through the phone... No pictures no cameras. Humans have evolved within the last hundred years, Its kinda crazy to think about. 😮 I mean a short time ago the wright brothers were trying to design an airplane and now look where we are? 😮😮 Geez.
To protect yourself against; alpha radiation ( the radiation that killed Alexander Litvinenko) all you need is a sheet of paper. A piece of material emitting alpha radiation introduced into the body, say in a cup of tea will destroy your organs in days. Strange that it can't get past a sheet of paper. To protect yourself against beta radiation, all you need is a sheet of aluminium. To protect yourself against gamma radiation, you need quite a bit of lead. This is my understanding, did it a couple of years when I did UK school person science for something to do.
External temperature? Where? The was no atmosphere... Where to measure that temperature? The flags can radiate twice energy than the moon surface then their temperature would be lower than de surface.
Fueron porque tenian el Saturno V any object on the moon would heat up and cool without an atmosphere. objects are still affected by solar radiation ..having a lack of air makes no difference
@@jamesbryerton8788 I didn't say the whole LRV disappeared, I said the tyres would have. That was just a joke, because the tyres were made of wire like piano wire, they didn't want a puncture. Maybe the seat webbing may have rotted by now. The three LRVs will still be there just waiting for another mission to photograph them. Of course any future photos will be said to be hoaxes as well. Hoaxers CANNOT be accept any evidence that is put to them, they are in a 'mind lock' caused by the IGV (Internet Gullibility Virus). Any totally worthless 'evidence' of a hoax is accepted without questioning using scientific principles, things like the lack of stars, no dust on the pads. Try to discuss with any hoaxer about the lack of stars and they have no idea of manual cameras using film but will insist that you should see stars!!!
James you are correct, you cannot see the LRVs with your telescope. Even the most powerful telescope on earth is not powerful enough to see the lRVS from around 240,000 miles away. You would need a telescope way more powerful than we have on earth at the moment, in fact there will probably be never be a telescope built on earth to see such details on the moon. Best get another mission to go and take photos, but we've already done that!!!! Any future missions to prove we went before would be labelled as FAKE yet again. So best revisit all your existing hoaxes and read up about all the new ones that come along all the time, life with conspiracies is so much more editing than the plain and simple truth and knowing the REAL truth does empower people like you.
Let me tell you the truth : There is very strong electromagnetic radiation in space, and there is a temperature difference of 150 degrees Celsius on the surface of the moon. Flags made of ordinary textiles cannot be used on the moon. Even China, which has the most advanced textile technology, was prepared one year for this special material Flag. But the US. flags "visited moon" all were made by Ordinary nylon material, $5.5 per piece. LOL
Thankyou for telling the "truth". There is very strong electromagnetic radiation in space, and there is a temperature difference of 150 degrees Celsius on the surface of the moon are fact derived from NASA's Apollo missions. Silicon pot holders from Walmart are good for +-250 C. And the radiation on the moon is only about 10X what it is on Earth. You would not want to live there, but a few hors is not going to do much.
"If they can send a drone to Mars, why don't they send another to the moon to check if the flag is there?" Because it would be an astronomical waste of money to do that only in order to slam conspiracy theorists.
@@kalaimang7095 It would never be worth it at any point. You're looking at hundreds of millions of dollars minimum to design and launch your probe and for what? The conspiracy theorists are just going to call the new missions faked as well anyways, so unless you have another primary objective worth that cost, you might as well just dig a big hole, pile the money it it, and light it on fire.
@@Mark-Stone That's right mark they have never been there , whats more they wont be going there in 2024 when they said , or mars . Because it is not possible . wake up buddy .
TROTH I’m asking myself a question right now; am I willing to ignore masses of evidence, not to mention common sense, because a random conspiracist on youtube makes an unsupported claim? The answer is no, I’m not. But thanks for your input, it’s a cool story.
@@Mark-Stone You say it's an unsupported claim , but the truth is all around you , magnetic radiation , gamma radiation , where did they store the 150 tanks of oxygen needed , their shadows getting longer and shorter on this video that should not happen .The film not being fogged by radiation . Stay cool Mark .
TROTH it is unsupported, because you’re questioning things you clearly don’t know about. Any old cockwomble can ask petulant questions, but an honest and intelligent person will actually take the next step, and find the answers.
I just love the sweet innocence of this question, "Are the flags left on the moon still there?" They were never there, so no.. they are not still, but that was a darling inquiry.
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 We lol? Every one of you seems to have a different idea of how it was "faked". And a different piece of "evidence" like who was holding the camera that was attached to the spacecraft!???!! There seems to be no consensus amount the "We".
The only people I've ever talked to about NASA, either believe everything they say or pretty much don't believe anything they say. How is that not a consensus?
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 So NASA does things like research de-icing systems for airlines. There are people you speak to who think ice on airplane wings is good? And when does NASA speak to these people? NASA comes to their houses?
They brought a US flag to the moon thats made of nylon? I think I know who made it knowing where those tons of aluminum foil that wraps the whole damn capsule came from!
@rent a shill !! It is impossible to answer the question "Why"....because it can always be the answer. ....And you must do your research, N A S A does intend to go back to the moon by 2026 with the intent to build a RESEARCH BASE in the following years......Reason, self explanatory. .....I'm waiting for that day, along with millions of others.......
The cameraman is still alive. “The sequence camera was pointing out Buzz Aldrin's right-hand lunar module window. It ran at 6 frames per second for the landing and was fitted with a 10mm wide-angle lens. The clip runs approximately from 50,000 feet altitude to the lunar surface, from about 102:30:45 to 102:46:38, one minute after touchdown.”
One day they will invent a camera that works without a guy holding it! Until then, I put a sandwich in the trunk of my car 1/week for the back-up camera cameraman.
that's correct despite some NASA-lovers youtubers who are adamant in trying to explain those VARB were harmless still why NASA is trying to find a way to go through them is something interesting
Hi@@rorymac7179 , they were sent up in unmanned missions prior to A15, the LRVs self unpacked, then self assembled. They then self drove to each of A15, A16 and A17 landing site ready to be driven by the astronauts!!! The VABs were no obstacle to the LRV's as there were no microelectronics in the LRVs. Hope this sorts out your problem.
@@donnn-sg4mk yea. NAsa actually said that we have not returned to the moon because we destroyed the technology to do so and it would be very difficult. I believe they are lying. It is also unusual that all the pictures are computer-generated to this very day.
They did not return after 1972 because the opposing team had already accepted the defeat. When someone wins the marathon and the other runners retire, what to do more around the stadium?
@@mr.e1220 Exactly my thoughts...one of they greatest things to happen in history and they go and destroy the tech to do it. It doesn't make any sense.
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 Yes, they brought back the film, including many photographs of Earth, but not the cameras. because,... They also needed a reason to NOT have photographs of the earth with an actual camera.
..so the ignition engine gases blow out the flags from lunar surface, but the same gases dont move the dust from lunar surface during landing... yea thats sound logic..
@@wags115 So, before you even got an answer to the question, you came to your conclusions. They had been remote-controlling the rover's camera from Houston all throughout Apollo 15, 16, and 17. They used that exact same mechanism to take video of the liftoffs.
How come we have telescopes that can see galaxies light years away, but we can't magnify enough to see a flag on the moon that is only 100,000's of miles away?
Lol so true
Because galaxies, although way further away they, are also extremely big (it takes light more then 100 years to travel from one side of the galaxy to the other).. and in Comparison to that the flag is extremely tiny. Also the galaxies emit a lot of light because of all the stars in them, the flag does not. But the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) actually gave us pictures of the flag while it was orbiting the moon.
Exactly were able to see millions of galaxy's and another planet behind Pluto but we cant see what's on the moon that's in our backyard and all this technology now days yet they plan a trip to Mars it's all.a hoax and it was all mind control 👎
John&Sara LiL Bit Of Everything Show read on top of you please
Put a pair of binoculars against a wall
We just don’t have the technology that we had 50 years ago...
SpringCactus 🤣🤣🤣 how ridiculous does that sound?
Too expensive NASA budget was cut enormously
ej sannic Yeah but technology gets cheaper not more expensive or stay the same so that argument is ridiculous
jim cherkas nah with the resources they need in this case and the money they have they needed extra help and that’s a reason they collaborate with SpaceX
You know there gonna go in 2024, right?
They never landed on the moon period
What a moon period?
Boomer
The flag was never even been to the moon.
English bad yours.
Cope and seethe. How dare you put down those men who risked their lives to ensure the future. If we didn't go to the moon, a lot of the stuff today would not exist.
I believe that flag is there...
...in the studio.
And why should anybody take notice of your ignorant opinion?
@@sailorman8668 like you ya mean?
One day we will be able to zoom in and confirm that nothing is there.
We have a telescope in lunar orbit that DID zoom in AND CONFIRM ALL THE LANDING SITES ARE THERE.
@@Tim22222ok let’s see
Earth to @@Tim22222
@@niteexplorer9934You can look it up... Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Even Japan, India, and China took photos of the moon on which you could see the apollo landing sites.
Those flags are still on earth.....
Florin Cochintu no cap
So true
I was on the moon 2 weeks ago and I can confirm the flags are still there.
I was at north moonville a couple years ago and it wasn’t there
@@Entropy106 it's on the western side. It's actually quite easy to find.
I left my underwear on the moon
@@PSYKSY_ go back and get them.
@Xs ° Captain I was on the moon when Armstrong was there
wtf just tell if the dmn flag is still up ther stop with this bs
They are still there, but probably faded into non recognition, at best.... UV from the sun would have destroyed the nylon and colors by now..
No!!!! RED LIPS! MY TEXT...WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON!!!!!
@@truthmatters7805 nice joke but didn't make me laugh.😂😂😂😂😂
I can guarantee you the rover is up there and all the metal things, but I doubt the flags have survived all the wear and tear from micrometeorite strikes and ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
@@truthmatters7805 we did 6 times 😁
The flags are in Nevada or after recording the crew took them back in the Hollywood studios
Exactly!
Facts
😂
If we really could go to the moon; we would have already had a space station there, just saying.
Why? What would that accomplish?
@@DeputyNordburg mining. Its all about mining
@@heuvelke1065 Oh yea, like the H3 that never been found on the moon, and is made here on Earth. Valuable stuff.
The vast majority of normies will believe anything the establishment tells them, they are their masters and, for all intents and purposes, their Gods
Exactly
So let me get this straight, we can see the rings around planets but can't see flags on a moon that DOESN'T orbit?
J Melcher when Armstrong got back he started his own cheese company,selling green cheese !
You mean rotate. The moon orbits around the earth! It just doesn’t rotate because it doesn’t have poles
LRO photos show the flags (except Apollo 11) standing and hanging normally. The moon does orbit, you can see it moving across the sky.
Yes big things are easier to see than small things. This can be a difficult concept for children younger than 4 to understand.
No... How big do you think that flag is...??
the flag is still properly planted in a film studio, we should be proud
it´s on the moon, if you like it or not
@@John_Gillmanprove it?
@@AntonioAugusto1010 prove that there´s a bottom to the mariana trench
@@John_Gillman you on drugs?
@@AntonioAugusto1010 you asked me to prove that the flags are still on the moon. there are pictures of the flags and of the other gear that they had from a lunar orbiter
😂😂😂 maybe at some Hollywood storage
Kubrick's nephew has one hanging on his bedroom wall.
Quite possibly Lars, the flags were very cheap ones from a store, modified with horizontal bar to stop them drooping.
Truth!
Final answer: NO!
True because there no people in moon 😂
@@Trollmoai Yes there ARE people on the Moon, it was a Jules Vern film Men in the Moon,I saw it when I was a kid, must be true!!!!
They never explained how they could stick a flag in the airless, waterless rocky surface of the moon. They were never on the moon.
They couldn't or you didn't check?
Ever heard of digging a hole to place the flag in?
Wow , the flag is in area 52 , damnit enough lies pls.
Theoretical answer for a non-existent event.
Alonso del Río G. You mean accurate answer for a real event
Here's a scary thought, the landing was fake and we've never been there.
@A Robinson Here's a scarier thought. His mom allows him on the internet.
@@dalepress1581 Ha ha ha!!!
@@dalepress1581 Everything on the internet isn't reliable information. That's why i get my information from government agencies with billions in funding who do actual science.
How about another trip to the moon ? With all the technology over the last 50 years there should be a drive thru Mc Donald's on the moon . Because the government said we were there doesn't mean anything, they lie about a lot of things. At the time of the space program who in government thought we would have more technology in a cell phone than what was used to supposedly send us to the moon . Again we can use a telescope to see stars light years away . Zoom in and show the flags
@@richardbrewin4165
YOU SAID: "How about another trip to the moon ?"
== Well, in 2019, congress finally allocated some money to start putting together moon missions again. So, yes, they're working on it. After 1972, congress didn't allocate a single dime for manned moon missions.
YOU SAID: "With all the technology over the last 50 years there should be a drive thru Mc Donald's on the moon ."
== Do you ACTUALLY believe that? Do you understand anything about thermodynamics? (Obviously not.) Traveling to the moon will never be achievable to common people, never. Why not? Because, no matter what you do, no matter how small or large you can make the craft, or how cheaply, it still takes a certain amount of energy to get to and from the moon. Even if you could reduce all other costs to zero, free rockets, free labor, free launch facilities, free landers, etc., even if all of that stuff costed nothing... sorry, but you'd still have to buy a couple of million pounds of rocket fuel and oxidizer per person. That stuff isn't cheap, you know. The common person will never be able to afford just the fuel and oxidizer, even if all other costs were reduced to zero (which is impossible anyway).
YOU SAID: "Because the government said we were there doesn't mean anything, they lie about a lot of things."
== Correct. But, nobody I've ever talked to about Apollo believes it because the government ever said anything. It's about understanding the history, the sciences involved, and the evidence. Nobody cares what governments say.
YOU SAID: "At the time of the space program who in government thought we would have more technology in a cell phone than what was used to supposedly send us to the moon."
== Pfffttt. First of all, Moore's Law was created in 1965. So, yes, it was firmly predicted about what today's computerized technology would be. Secondly, why do you think everything moves at the pace of computer technology? Actually, rapid computer technology advancements are the exception to the rule, not the rule. There really isn't any other type of technology that advances that quickly. Rocket technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Life support technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radio communications technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radar hasn't advanced that quickly. Medical technology hasn't advanced that quickly. Radiation shielding technology hasn't advanced that quickly. You can always recognize someone's massive ignorance when they refer to computer or smartphone (which is just a computer) technology as if everything is supposed to advance at the same pace. Sorry, it doesn't. Advancement, sure. Advancement at the pace of Moore's Law, sorry, no.
YOU SAID: "Again we can use a telescope to see stars light years away . Zoom in and show the flags"
== Good grief. Distance isn't the problem. Angular size is the problem. Go Google "optical resolution" and read the Wiki page. Not that I'd encourage anybody to use Wiki in place of an actual education... but in your case... you need something to snap the stupid out of the stuff you're saying. See, the thing is, you can calculate the size lens you'd need in order to see flags on the lunar surface. The Wiki article gives you the formula. I haven't done the math for a flag, but I've done it for the landers. And, in order to see the lunar landers from Earth in enough detail to recognize them, you'd need a lens a quarter mile across. A flag?? As seen from above?? You're talking about an object just an inch or two thick, as seen from above. I'm not doing the math again for your sake, but, you're easily talking about a lens many miles in diameter. And, guess what, even if you had a lens that big (good luck with that), sorry, but you still couldn't see the flags, because of the Earth's atmospheric distortion. So, again, there are multiple reasons that you're asking for the impossible.
Go back to school and learn something before you fling your ignorance around, as if it's some sort of evidence against Apollo... that not a single physicist on Earth has ever realized... oh, but, you did, right? No physicist has ever thought of just looking through a telescope, right? Oh, but you have. Yeah, the entire planet's physicists are all dumb, and you're the smart one. Good grief.
Can't deal with fabric bunching but we flew a quarter million miles each way in a tin can in 1969 perfectly.
No, not "perfectly".
It was more than perfect, hyper perfect!
Daan........more periods!.... . . . . ........ . . . . . .
@Daan Daan How do you know that?
@Daan Daan _i calculated the amount of energy in different types of propulsion fluids and i took the weight of the descending module._
Did you remember to take Moon's gravity into an account?
_There is so much power neededso that if this was real the engine had blown a krater in the moondust._
Would it had blown a crater in a moonrock?
_It's just impossible. Even with today's technology._
If you find that your admittedly-uninformed personal opinion disagrees with expert consensus on a technical topic, please consider that "All the experts know something I don't" is a more likely explanation than "I alone solved a complex problems expert have long been studying."
_the tinfoil that was used for the moonlander_
You mean the thermal blanket?
_would never be able to hold the force of a pressurized cabin in a vacuum._
Nobody claims that it did.
_The astronauts are inconsistent in their explanations_
No they're not. You just don't seem to understand how the _Apollo_ Lunar Module was actually constructed.
_and when people ask how it exactly worked it was suddenly classified._
No it's not. The information you are referring to is still publicly available.
@Daan Daan _Now you would have needed a sixth of that._
You're not landing an _"Apollo_ rocket" on the Moon. You're landing an _Apollo_ Lunar Module on the Moon. It doesn't weight 1/6th of the _Saturn_ V (that's how it's called) rocket weight. It weights *1/185th* of the _Saturn_ V weight.
_No I mean the tinfoil_
Again, there was no tinfoil included in the design of the _Apollo_ Lunar Module. This is true even if the Moon landings are fake.
_that was ment as structural part of the thermal blanket._
The thermal blanket wasn't meant to be a structural part of the _Apollo_ Lunar Module, and wasn't meant to be pressurized. This is true even if the Moon landings are fake.
_The lander was not on a moonrock,_
Yes it was. A moon rock covered with a thin layer of dust. This is true even if that "moon rock" was fake.
_Strange enough the feet stayed clean on top._
"Strange" how? In the absence of an atmosphere, there wouldn't be any dust cloud, so there wouldn't be any dust to settle on the top of the landing pads (that's how they're called). In that regard, even if the Moon landings are fake, I'd have to commend NASA for getting this detail _right._
_etc. etc. Do the math yourself._
I did. You're clearly wrong, _objectively so,_ even if the Moon landings _are_ fake.
_if you want to believe it_
It's not a matter of belief. It's a matter of understanding the science.
lol however did they manage the van allen belt ? when they did not even know it existed and naturally passing through it both times, enabled the astronauts to live a ripe old age. Ah cmon. The clothing they wore would never stand up to the radiation lol
The Ban Allen Radiation Belts were discovered in 1958. Why would you think it is impossible for them to go through?
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 what was the composite of the Mercury Spacesuit ?
@@tazwoh2002 can't you search that? And what does it matter? The Mercury Missions didn't go past the belts. Again, what makes you think they can't go through the Van Allen Radiation Belts? What evidence do you have?
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 James Van Allen stated that after tests, that the van allen belts were too dangerous for humans to past through with the technology they had at present in 1958. However Hamilton Standard conneticut stated they did not put any radiation protection in the make up of the suit when man went to the moon. Cosmic radiation would of been deadly for the astronauts "FACT" the van allen tests went 200 miles above earth and as altitiude increased the geiger counter went off the scale and shut down during a test. So 1958 to 1969 Van Allen Belts were deemed deadly, then NASA 1969-1972 Deemed them safe. Which was when the Apollo and Gemini (Not mercury sorry) were taking place. 1972 to date they are deadly again "Strange that" for verification watch this : -ruclips.net/video/hQDTlsN5V24/видео.html
@@casanovafrankenstein4193 also another video - ruclips.net/video/JgXDi7mc43M/видео.html
You cant say van allen was wrong and NASA knew this. Has the Russians been to the moon ... NO because they know this also.
I don`t believe anybody has ever landed on the moon and never will
@Johnny Dominguez you're dumb
@Johnny Dominguez do you want me to introduce myself or what xD
@Johnny Dominguez don't cry
@crookback I don't get really get what you are going on about 😂
@crookback it's not a conspiracy it's the truth... a waving flag on a planet with no gravity???? Ummm that makes no sense
Fake
Don't you just love postings like this? - Flags will be there unless the Janitor removes it from the movie set.
Yes somewhere else in secret movie studios 😭😭🚩🚩🚩
NO. The flags left in the studio in the hangar where the moon landing was faked were taking away nd burned with all the other evidence of the fakery.
Yup
Look kids, we never went to the moon, get over it.
What makes you think that the Apollo lunar landing missions never happened?
And you also believe the earth is flat? Typical.
They👏 were 👏never👏 on👏 the👏 moon 👏
I honestly don't understand where all these conspiracy theorists are coming from, but I also don't think the astronauts themselves care whether people believe that they did it or not.
@@diromiz The astronauts didn't look like they gave a stuff whether they went or not in the press conference they gave. It was very troubling watching it.
@Def Style True. It already costed you *_your brain_* :D
@Def Style Learn the basics before you present yourself as an ignorant clown :)
@Def Style Do you believe everything you see on the internet?
thats why they left a corner reflector on the moon that until now is still working
No , they are in the studio where you filmed the moon landing.
You wish fruitcake.
True!!! The guys hold & running the wired harness....pulled too tight.....and he fell over.......they were trying to simulate what they THINK the gravity on the "moon"....is......but....they have no clue.....funny chit tho!!!!
If theres oil in the moon i will believe USA has been there
Those flags in the museum is actually the one used on the moon landing
Of course they aren't! What a silly thing to say.
Get this we can see intense and vivid pictures of Mars, Andromeda, Titian, and the Sun but we can’t see 6 flags on our closets natural satellite. My guess is probably because they aren’t there👀.
prince well the reason why we can't see because the flag isn't huge or shiny its a flag while Mars,Andromeda,Titan,and the sun are
lets go back again to the moon for the last time ,now,to prove that the moon landing was real
Pay for it if you want them to go back. NASA prefers to use their budget for scientific purposes than to spend millions for usless moon landing. We learned what we wanted to learn, no need to go back
@@maciek1831 let's go back to disprove the world
@Elite Gamegerous they are actually planning to go back. Congrats on all the tax money we will lose for people like you
Lol.. no we have never been to the moon.. sorry
@Elite Gamegerous cause he knows it can't be proven. It should be cheap, with just an iPhone and a rocket, but no one that believes we did won't listen to common sense
On another shill site the flag was specially made to loook like it was moving that’s how they explained the moving flag
All the flags was built by the same design.
No, theyre still in the studio that it was filmed in
There would be a McDonalds on the moon by now if the US really went there.
Nothing to see here folks, that’s space wind.
“It wasn’t wind, the flag was bunched up”
While I have concluded and agree that the flag waving shown in this video are explained by the astronauts holding the flag pole I have here are at least 2 other tapes from various missions showing what appears to be the flag waving without direct contact from the astronauts. (1) ruclips.net/video/HP2IIb1S-xQ/видео.html shows flag movement without astronauts present. Very interesting. (2) ruclips.net/video/ymwE1sNm82Y/видео.html shows flag movement starting from a still position after an astronaut runs by without touching flag. In this sequence I as a scientist can give at least 3 explanations : (A) Static from the astronaut running by. This could be tougher in a vacuum . ( B ) Ground vibration movement transferred to flag as the astronaut runs by. ( C) Movement and displacement of air as the astronaut runs by. Of course here it means a studio on earth if it is true. YOUR THOUGHTS. I AM VERY INTERESTED. ANYONE ?
It's like inertia and gravity doesn't exist on the moon. The flag has a stick supporting the upper side of the flag making it stick horizontal straight btw.
@Lyrical I was being sarcastic at the first half, of course inertia and gravity exist in space. Including in the moon.
@@ptauagpt you sir are guilty of cultural vandalism. Go teach a liberal arts degree at any "progressive school you choose.Don't peddle it here.
Johnny Dominguez the truth will prevail one day
I can confirm the flag is no longer in the airplane hanger this was filmed in...
Yea at one point they drive the rover 12 kilometers in the hanger and the mountains in the background only get a little closer. That was a big hanger.
@@DeputyNordburg
The Apollo missions probably weren't entirely shot from a hangar. The photos that show the demarcation lines -- those were shot from a hangar.
@@lorichet One day you guys will have real evidence and won't have to say "probably". Maybe 50 more years?
On the Moon the difference in temperature between shadow and sunlit surfaces is from minus 70 to plus 280 degrees. This is why no man made object can be still in tact after a short time.
Needless to say no people ever went there and its very unlikely to ever go.
On Earth if you talk about temperature and don't want to appear foolish you name the units as C or F.
The wide range of temperatures on the moon occur over the 650 hour long day/night cycle that most people would not consider "a short time".
A pair of silicon oven mits that cost less than 20 bucks can handle a temperature range from -40F to 425F. (they are manmade)
The reason no rational people believe the moon landings are a hoax is because you guys put forward this nonsensical conjecture.
@@DeputyNordburg
Bladi bladi bla to you as well, deputy crackpot.
There's no ambient temperature in a vacuum and objects will not change temperature instantly. They will SLOWLY absorb heat in sunlight and SLOWLY lose it in shadow.
By the way, plus 280 is nowhere close to what firefighting equipment can be designed for. Try 3,000.
@@kevinskinner4986 Mostly correct. Most objects in space are partially exposed to the sun, and partially exposed to the blackness of space. A satellite for example. They gain heat from the sun, but radiate heat away at every angle. And those will normally become very cold overall. An object close to the Earth or moon will of course gain some heat from that celestial body. In either case it's a balance.
An object can change it's average temperature based on it's color. Bright white like a spacesuit reflects away most of the sunlight's heat before it becomes absorbed. Black for max heat, silver/grey (like the cameras) for a balance. Turn the object frequently to make the temperature average out...
Moon hoax people, I like to call them hoax folks, take the NASA derived max recorded temperature for the moon, and claim that is the temperature everywhere at all times on the sunny side. Which is of course silly. The max temperature is at noon at the equator, and even then is just a surface temperature.
@@kevinskinner4986 moon and Sun is local. Has to be.
93 million miles away and only few hundred miles up radiation issues
Riddle me this, we cant answer the question if the flag is still there or what it looks like even though we have a 25,000 lb, $2,500,000,000 telescope that's been orbiting at 350 miles since 1990 and is as long as a school bus ?
Is there... life on mars?
We can. LRO telescope, smaller but closer. Spotted the flags, footprints etc.
That's because you don't understand telescopes. Trying to see the flag on the moon is like trying to observe an ant 5km away through a telescope. You ain't going to see the ant!
I have never seen any telescopic evidence of anything we allegedly left behind on the moon. I did hear one NASA scientist say "the moon is to close for our powerful telescopes to focus on". 🙄
@@Testequip You make no sense !
There's a good reason why MTV movie awards for fictional pieces of art chose the moon man as a their trophy.
Never thought of that
Indeed
All you stoner-detectives and your stupid conclusions about unrelated crap, never ceases to amaze me with your fantasy logic.
right there is obvious signs... People just obliviously ignore it.
Most people that watch MTV are on the moon !
So, you didn’t answer the question. Thanks, CBS.
@Lawenda Paszkiewicz Really? Send me the time stamp where the question was definitively answered please.
Never been to the moon
Never been in space
Never been in Antarctica
Never explored the earth
Never measured the earth
circumference
Never had satellite orbiting earth
Science is based on observation. If you cannot observe the subject of your study, you’re not doing science, but lies. How do you talk of Jupiter, mars, sun, moon, Saturn when you have never been there? Telling me there is water on Mars while you’re here sitting on your couch? Waw!!!
If you are so precise with your science from that distance using whatever scanner you have, why just don’t you scan the earth and tell me where all the diamond is so I could go get it?
Maybe still on the studio set.
Apollo, a criminal joke.
_"Ignorance is Strength." I'm weak._
i hope these 5 years were used to realise that the moon landings are real. cope
The trouble with liars is they trip themselves up eventually that’s why the Astro nots accounts differ so much these guys are not professional liars
the Apollo 11 press conference was very peculiar and troubling
@@mizofan Yes!! I watched that for the first time and couldn't believe what I was watching. They sat there looking terrified. But of what?
😃 The Beautiful Lie 😃
mizofan ...I agree, They looked confused and guilty about the answers they were giving, If I just got back from the moon and being the first one.. you couldn’t keep me quiet, I’d wouldn’t be able to contain my excitement.
@@rubyrose4024 being asked stupid questions like the ones you conspiracy dbags come up with
Micro meteor attacks 🤔 i wonder how the astronaughts on the moon landing were immune to those.
describe the size and frequency of these micrometeorites, say per hectare. Where are they coming from?
No, because no person has ever been on the moon,..
Incorrect. A dozen astronauts have walked on the moon.
Buzz Aldrin admitted he only went once!
@@yassassin6425 Hollywood movies don't count,..
@@DeputyNordburg buzz also told a small child when she was asking about it, that they didn't really go
@@DeputyNordburg another person asked buzz to swear on the Bible that he really went to the moon and he wouldn't do it, and punched the guy in the face
The flags are near to area 51 in US please go and see
djins
@@hanp2205 ογμ
That flag is the first ever trash on the moon
3ñ\/ÿ ô1 technically speaking yes, first trash on the moon
That flag would make big bucks on ebay, lets go get it.
no everyone knows it's a fake ....show us the waving moon one...ha....still trying to sell us....
@@stevenmcclelland1859 The real one never made it to the moon, :-))
There's no need for that you could find that flag in the hollywood studios
Exactly............maybe even area 51 at that studio, well used
Could you imagine being God and watching all of this?
Watching humans try to make an airplane make eventually succeeding and then watching them build rockets and eventually going to the Moon....
Imagine....
I can just imagine God looking down like ,
"Wow they're going to the Moon now"
I wonder why God hasn't destroyed the Earth with all the evil things going on and then I think of this.
Maybe he thinks that the good outweighs the bad??
Its kind of crazy because just 100 years ago we couldn't even communicate through the phone... No pictures no cameras.
Humans have evolved within the last hundred years,
Its kinda crazy to think about. 😮
I mean a short time ago the wright brothers were trying to design an airplane and now look where we are? 😮😮
Geez.
Genuine question here, how does paper thin aluminum shield you from all types of radiation in space?
the radiation isnt that much, its just the rays from the sun ... and past astronauts are actually being tested for radiation poisoning because of that
Its only thick enough to protect Santa Claus and the easter bunny.
To protect yourself against;
alpha radiation ( the radiation that killed Alexander Litvinenko) all you need is a sheet of paper. A piece of material emitting alpha radiation introduced into the body, say in a cup of tea will destroy your organs in days. Strange that it can't get past a sheet of paper.
To protect yourself against beta radiation, all you need is a sheet of aluminium.
To protect yourself against gamma radiation, you need quite a bit of lead.
This is my understanding, did it a couple of years when I did UK school person science for something to do.
Or getting through the Van Allen belt
@@cynthiapowers3469 that's what he meant idiot here watch this ruclips.net/video/9BEylTGOlQ8/видео.html
Yes, they're still there, waving around in no atmosphere.
Well they are waving because even if a small amount of force was put on it then there is no returning force to stop it from waving
Well folks you heard it here first.....when they left the moon in their spacecraft they burned all of the flags. lol
Amateurs.....
The flags are still in the hollywood basements. ^^
Nylon can withstand those external temperature s wow
External temperature? Where? The was no atmosphere... Where to measure that temperature? The flags can radiate twice energy than the moon surface then their temperature would be lower than de surface.
Fueron porque tenian el Saturno V any object on the moon would heat up and cool without an atmosphere. objects are still affected by solar radiation ..having a lack of air makes no difference
@@brain8484 ㄱㄴㅉㅅㅉㄸㅊ.?
ㅡㅡㅌㄴㄷㅈㆍ5ㄴ5ㄴ
@@fueronporquetenianelsaturn9632 no air = cant measure temperature, give this man a Nobel
Yes. Even the max surface temperature of the moon (on the equator at noon) is less the melting point of Nylon.
I was there recently and it remains in place! I put up a new one this year!
Darrell Crawford I’ve been there since that hit of acid I took in the 70s
I hope you did not forget to lock the door to my space station
forget the flag they left a jeep up there. turn your telescope and find out . you cant
the tyres on those jeeps would be rotted by now, you see the UV radiation rots rubber in a vacuum in low gravity.
yeah right the whole jeep disappeared like the 911 planes
@@jamesbryerton8788 I didn't say the whole LRV disappeared, I said the tyres would have. That was just a joke, because the tyres were made of wire like piano wire, they didn't want a puncture. Maybe the seat webbing may have rotted by now. The three LRVs will still be there just waiting for another mission to photograph them. Of course any future photos will be said to be hoaxes as well. Hoaxers CANNOT be accept any evidence that is put to them, they are in a 'mind lock' caused by the IGV (Internet Gullibility Virus). Any totally worthless 'evidence' of a hoax is accepted without questioning using scientific principles, things like the lack of stars, no dust on the pads. Try to discuss with any hoaxer about the lack of stars and they have no idea of manual cameras using film but will insist that you should see stars!!!
James you are correct, you cannot see the LRVs with your telescope. Even the most powerful telescope on earth is not powerful enough to see the lRVS from around 240,000 miles away. You would need a telescope way more powerful than we have on earth at the moment, in fact there will probably be never be a telescope built on earth to see such details on the moon. Best get another mission to go and take photos, but we've already done that!!!! Any future missions to prove we went before would be labelled as FAKE yet again. So best revisit all your existing hoaxes and read up about all the new ones that come along all the time, life with conspiracies is so much more editing than the plain and simple truth and knowing the REAL truth does empower people like you.
sun and moon are the same size. the sun 7 times brighter than moon . book of enoch . i xm not even religus but explains a difrent view
Let me tell you the truth : There is very strong electromagnetic radiation in space, and there is a temperature difference of 150 degrees Celsius on the surface of the moon. Flags made of ordinary textiles cannot be used on the moon. Even China, which has the most advanced textile technology, was prepared one year for this special material Flag. But the US. flags "visited moon" all were made by Ordinary nylon material, $5.5 per piece. LOL
Thankyou for telling the "truth". There is very strong electromagnetic radiation in space, and there is a temperature difference of 150 degrees Celsius on the surface of the moon are fact derived from NASA's Apollo missions.
Silicon pot holders from Walmart are good for +-250 C. And the radiation on the moon is only about 10X what it is on Earth. You would not want to live there, but a few hors is not going to do much.
more importantly , are they still waving ? .......OH SAY CAN YOU SEE ?
.....
No one's landed on the moon
And as usual no proof. Is your life so mundane that you come here to trash great accomplishments for fun? What a morphydite.
You lie
@@jasonolson3133 Never assume a lie when stupidity explains it perfectly :D
That’s what Area 51 is all about
@@timothyflanagan3641 Ah, you have been there? No? Then keep your bloody mouth shut. Idiot
The evidence that they never been to the moon outweight's the evidence that they have been to the moon period.
That is a fallacy, It's the other way arround. You are dumb, or paranoid. Period.
@@daon23 I can say the same thing about you. You're brainwashed.
Juan Carlos Valdivia if you think it was faked you are actually mentally challeneged sorry to break it to you
That's hilarious and so not true
@@jlpt9960 I think you have a low IQ for thinking we did. We should be able to do it with an iPhone and a rocket today
Yes. With original tapes.
Lol
"There is no dark side of the moon really. Matter of fact it's all dark."
There is a scientist who claimed the moon is made of plasma. ruclips.net/video/1oCNGcbwxWg/видео.html
@J Calhoun What does that even mean?
The best movie ever made by US...
Where is the Oscar Trophy goes to ?
They recieved the russian 1st price: the golden bear. The russian team retired from the competition after accept their deffeat
flags are still in nasa stores.
Yes NASA stores. Thats where I buy my moon pies.
What flag ?? The Hollywood movie flag
"If they can send a drone to Mars, why don't they send another to the moon to check if the flag is there?"
Because it would be an astronomical waste of money to do that only in order to slam conspiracy theorists.
Key Strix would it not be worth it at this point?
@@kalaimang7095 It would never be worth it at any point. You're looking at hundreds of millions of dollars minimum to design and launch your probe and for what? The conspiracy theorists are just going to call the new missions faked as well anyways, so unless you have another primary objective worth that cost, you might as well just dig a big hole, pile the money it it, and light it on fire.
Kevin Skinner Very true. Either way we should go back to the moon, and I hope we will eventually.
@@kalaimang7095
no. it would change nothing. People would still say it's fake.
@@kalaimang7095 Why do that when the conspiracy theorists will just say that the footage is fake lol. Then you're back at square one.
No flags were left behind. Enough lies
They never leaved a flag because they were never there to leave one
Paul Olone Of course they weren’t sweetheart
@@Mark-Stone That's right mark they have never been there , whats more they wont be going there in 2024 when they said , or mars . Because it is not possible . wake up buddy .
TROTH I’m asking myself a question right now; am I willing to ignore masses of evidence, not to mention common sense, because a random conspiracist on youtube makes an unsupported claim? The answer is no, I’m not. But thanks for your input, it’s a cool story.
@@Mark-Stone You say it's an unsupported claim , but the truth is all around you , magnetic radiation , gamma radiation , where did they store the 150 tanks of oxygen needed , their shadows getting longer and shorter on this video that should not happen .The film not being fogged by radiation . Stay cool Mark .
TROTH it is unsupported, because you’re questioning things you clearly don’t know about. Any old cockwomble can ask petulant questions, but an honest and intelligent person will actually take the next step, and find the answers.
We could send live TV from the moon to earth in 1969 but we had no end of trouble sending it from the US to Europe!
Imagine risking your life just to get there and people say it's fake
It's.fake. if you know physics u will understand they faked everything
@@everfaithful8796 reverse, if you know physics you know they faked it on location on the moon and returned to earth.
They were never there, does that answer your question.
Dirk Arse 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The truth!
No.
Agreed
The Flags are in perfect condition..They were carefully stored away in Hollywood’s Prop room.
The only threat to the flag is when the Chinese goes there and takes it down and start claiming it’s their moon.
Our men put the flags there first so that is all that matters.
It’s not there because no one never got to the moon
Do you really believe that????
I just love the sweet innocence of this question,
"Are the flags left on the moon still there?"
They were never there, so no.. they are not still, but that was a darling inquiry.
Just get a telescope and prove they are not there.
@@DeputyNordburg instead, we've already proven NASA lies so why chase some wild goose when we can just consider the source?
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 We lol? Every one of you seems to have a different idea of how it was "faked". And a different piece of "evidence" like who was holding the camera that was attached to the spacecraft!???!! There seems to be no consensus amount the "We".
The only people I've ever talked to about NASA, either believe everything they say or pretty much don't believe anything they say. How is that not a consensus?
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 So NASA does things like research de-icing systems for airlines. There are people you speak to who think ice on airplane wings is good? And when does NASA speak to these people? NASA comes to their houses?
2022 Orion. The moon's back on!
NO because they were never planted in the first place DUH
Yeah the flag is still on the film set 😆
They brought a US flag to the moon thats made of nylon? I think I know who made it knowing where those tons of aluminum foil that wraps the whole damn capsule came from!
If there was a flag at the first place
Satellites in lunar orbit from 4 different countries have detected and verified the various Apollo landing sites. Take care.
Go back to the moon and look at the flag !!! Yeah right, 50 years on, we're still waiting. ......
@rent a shill !!! Inpossible to answer the question " Why "
@rent a shill !! It is impossible to answer the question "Why"....because it can always be the answer. ....And you must do your research, N A S A does intend to go back to the moon by 2026 with the intent to build a RESEARCH BASE in the following years......Reason, self explanatory. .....I'm waiting for that day, along with millions of others.......
@felix mendez..So true, narrow minded people, always their last resort...
You have never been to the moon Answer Stanley Kubrick 😂😂😂
Mohammed Jayck DingWall every time I get high !
Amazing! They make more money than I do selling crap to the sheeples of this world!
Well WE WONT KNOW UNTIL WE GO TO THE MOON AGAIN
2:40 RIP CAMERAMAN
The cameraman is still alive.
“The sequence camera was pointing out Buzz Aldrin's right-hand lunar module window. It ran at 6 frames per second for the landing and was fitted with a 10mm wide-angle lens. The clip runs approximately from 50,000 feet altitude to the lunar surface, from about 102:30:45 to 102:46:38, one minute after touchdown.”
One day they will invent a camera that works without a guy holding it! Until then, I put a sandwich in the trunk of my car 1/week for the back-up camera cameraman.
How did you get through the Van Allen belt ? Because humans still can't get through it today ?
that's correct despite some NASA-lovers youtubers who are adamant in trying to explain those VARB were harmless still why NASA is trying to find a way to go through them is something interesting
HR5736 'magic"
Hi@@rorymac7179 , they were sent up in unmanned missions prior to A15, the LRVs self unpacked, then self assembled. They then self drove to each of A15, A16 and A17 landing site ready to be driven by the astronauts!!! The VABs were no obstacle to the LRV's as there were no microelectronics in the LRVs. Hope this sorts out your problem.
Cause science
Hi @@guillermohoffmann8417 what radiation in the VABs is dangerous? How much do you know about radiation?
We never went to the moon. LOL. Why haven't we ever returned in 50 years?
I agree its odd why we have not gone back...but how could it all be a hoax for goodness sake. Did you watch the documentary last night????
@@donnn-sg4mk yea. NAsa actually said that we have not returned to the moon because we destroyed the technology to do so and it would be very difficult. I believe they are lying. It is also unusual that all the pictures are computer-generated to this very day.
They did not return after 1972 because the opposing team had already accepted the defeat. When someone wins the marathon and the other runners retire, what to do more around the stadium?
@@fueronporquetenianelsaturn9632 you don't destroy the technology. That sounds like a lie
@@mr.e1220 Exactly my thoughts...one of they greatest things to happen in history and they go and destroy the tech to do it. It doesn't make any sense.
"Hey look mom a flag" - Alien Kid
More like “⊑⟒⊬ ⋔⍜⋔ ⏃ ⎎⌰⏃☌”
Hard time jabbing the pole in the lunar surface?
WTF happened to scientist’s million year old thick surface dust layer?
The dust layer was only a couple of inches thick. You, on the other hand, are much thicker.
Visit ... Yes ... Flags can be placed to show the world who successfully made these journies ... BUT ownership ..... NO
The space shuttle never went to the moon...It can't.
the Wright brothers plane never went to the moon..... It can't.
nobody ever said it did
Supposedly there are 12 cameras left there too They just brought back the film to save weight. Best cameras ever made at the time.
They also needed a reason to NOT have photographs of the earth with an actual camera.
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 Yes, they brought back the film, including many photographs of Earth, but not the cameras. because,... They also needed a reason to NOT have photographs of the earth with an actual camera.
This is all just fantasy you know. They never went.
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 You have weird fantasies.
@@bettertvreceptionwithfoilf7100 the stars were never seen apparently- comical!
..so the ignition engine gases blow out the flags from lunar surface, but the same gases dont move the dust from lunar surface during landing... yea thats sound logic..
Who recorded that 2:40 😂
My thoughts exactly. I read the comments first before I asked the same question. They must have left someone there......duh!!! 🤣🤣
wags115 no bro.. they told the aliens to return it. duhh everybody knows this. 🤣🤣
@@wags115 So, before you even got an answer to the question, you came to your conclusions. They had been remote-controlling the rover's camera from Houston all throughout Apollo 15, 16, and 17. They used that exact same mechanism to take video of the liftoffs.
Have you all heard about rover?
US marine do you know how fast the moon is moving. It is impossible to land on. They faked it to so people could believe that the earth is sphere.
The flags are not there anymore because the very strong winds that made them flap so nicely toppled them, OK?
Anita Podsudek+ they never where there. It was faked. IT WAS MOVING. THERE IS NOT GRAVITY ON SPACE. Also why haven’t we gone there again?
@@lou64444 there is GRAVITY on moon its 1/6th that of the Earth
M. J+ no
I notice something on 2:42 the camera was recording them after they left the moon who was recording them
Ed Fendell controlled the rover's camera from mission control, just as he did all through Apollo 15-16-17.
The flag was there at the back of the moon so that can't see anymore.