@ 3:40 you are quoting manusmruti as a source of definition for sanatan dharma as "to follow the rules of caste, country and family". Could you quote the verse number? You could perhaps be mis-translating the "varna" as caste or the word "jati" as caste. In non-technical conversation that may be correct, but in technical conversations one has to abide by the technical jargon ("pari-bhasha"). What is required is an open atmosphere to discuss (seemingly contradictory) ideas and accept the view that triumphs in a civil debate (Adi shankaracharya challenged Mandam Mishra for a debate with the promise of accepting Mishra's views if defeated). And there is nothing wrong in having multiple definitions (of sanatana dharma) in varied contexts.
🪔👌🙏✊🪔 Absolutely correct. Ours is a multicultural multi belief multi coloured society. Thats the same thought when I was listening to him. Whats wrong if we have hundreds of definitions of Sanatana and Dharma. We have hundreds of definitions for Dharma, and the people who came to define us were totally confused. For them Religion means one ideal god sitting somewhere above, one book and one messenger. For us any simple person who has done a great sankalpa, could be a great scientist like Abdul Kalam or JC Bose or a yogi like Ramana Maharishi or great philosopher like Shanakaracharya, who has renounced everything to tapasya achieved something great, has gone closer to the supreme and we accept them as a messenger. They just cannot understand us. Moreover their language cannot translate Indian words and its Rasa or true feeling, also their vocabulary is 10 to 15% of Sanskrit or any Indian language. So they just translate from poor translations and finally they understand nothing.
@@jitendramahor7755 come on bro, I see him very non biased, may be based on the topic he could not have found any link or relevance of shivaji. Let us wait and see, or you can request him to make a video on this.
For the real meaning and difference between the words Hindu, Hindutva and Hinduism, read the book "Hindutva" written by V. D. Savarkar. He has explained it beautifully with all the historic, geographic and religious aspects .
बहुत सुन्दर व्याख्या । मै सेन्ट्रल हिन्दू स्कूल (1949) वाराणसी का छात्र हूं। यह पुस्तक कालेज मे पढ़ाई जाती थी। Theology का कोर्स होता था। सिर्फ पास होना होता था।
शैव और वैष्णव धर्म के बारे मे तो कुछ बोला ही नही? जब राजतरगिनी मे हिन्दु शब्द है तो वो अंग्रेजो का दिया हुआ कैसे हुआ? और एक बात बौद्ध धर्म भी तो हिन्दु से ही डिस्कबर हुआ है । DARIUS - I के समय मे बौद्ध नही थे? उस ने केवल हिन्दु शब्द ही ईस्तेमाल किया? सनातन धर्म के बारे मे भागवत गीता मे पुरा श्लोक है। "कुल धर्म सनातन" आप ने 'हिमालयात् समारभ्य यावत् इन्दु सरोवरम्। तं देवनिर्मितं देशं हिन्दुस्थानं प्रचक्षते॥'- (बृहस्पति आगम) की तो बात ही नही की? आप विवाद चाहते है की हिन्दुओं मे हिन भावना पैदा हो और वो धर्म परिवर्तन करे ? जब राज तरगिनी और विध्यापति हिन्दु शब्द का प्रयोग कर चुके है तो अग्रेजो का दिया कैसे हुई ?
I am truly amazed by your explanations on each of the topics you have presented which are rich in contents and facts with rational and evidences! However, I could not find your latest videos and so far have seen only videos which are a year old..do you have other channels so I can subscribe? I can not resist listening more to your brilliant analysis covering most of the topics from historical perspectives which are enriching my knowledge in these areas...I also miss your introduction part so I could know more about you sir! It will be really great to know more about you!! I can just guess you must be a great historian or professor in history?
Samasya yaha hain ki hum 'Dharm' ko 'Religion' shabd ki paribhasha se samjhne ki kosis karte hain. Or agar aisa karenge to ham baar baar fail honge is Desh ke sahi itihaas or sanskriti ko samjhne mein. Asal baat ye hai ki is desh mein kabhi bhi Religion jaisi cheej exist nahi karti thi, balki yahan pe 'Patth (marg)' hua karte the jinka ultimate goal Liberation(moksh) hua karta tha. Or is desh ki saari philosophy or present time me hum jinko religion se denote karte hain isi Moksh par based hain. Yaha par aapko sagun Bhakti ka maarg milega jisme Ishwar ki bahut relevance hain. Vahi ek dam iske ulat Nirgun bhakti ka maarg bhi hain. Yaha par theistic tradition bhi hain like Shaiv, vaishnav, shakt etc. Yaha par non-theistic tradition (Ishwar ki utni manyata nahi hain) like Samkhya, Yoga, Buddhism, Jain bhi hain. Yah par Tantra hai jaha par cast system ki bilkul manahi hain or Yaha par Vedic tradition bhi hain jaha par Varna system bahut prabhaav rakhta hain. Yaha par materialistic tradition bhi the like Charvaka jo naa to reincarnation or naa hi bhagwan me vishwas rakhte the. To yaha par Krishna ka rebel path bhi tha jinhone Vedic god Indra ki puja karne se mana karwa diya. To is Bharat desh ko samajhne ke liye hame isi desh ke nazariye ki jarurat hain or jab tak ham western or abrahamic lens lagake yaha ke dharmo ko samajhne ki kosis karenge to ham baar baar fail honge.
मामा जी भारत एक खोज में जब भारत में कुछ था ही नहीं तो लोगों ने भारत की खोज क्यों की , आपके सारे लेख बताते हैं कि अरब से आए मुसलमानों ने हमारी हिस्ट्री लिखी आप मिथक चाणक्य चन्द्रगुप्त मोर्य को नहीं जानते, आप मिथक गीता रामायण महाभारत वेद पुराण को नहीं जानते लेकिन आपके हिसाब से ये सभी कहानियाँ हैं आपके हिसाब से तो शायद भारत नाम ही मिथक है
Very thought provoking deep research , exploring history without being harsh on negative aspects respecting sentiments of community . Very well . Kudos to a fine and refined efforts Kaushik ji
We knew what Dharm was; the basis that upheld everything in the universe and all parts of it. Whatever name we use for refering to Dharm, it remains what it is, as an expression of natural laws in operation. So, the basis for understanding nature, the universe and everything else in it and the guidance for harmonious thought and action in it, like ethics, etc. were always ours and are still our people's Dharm. We all understand this very deeply and very well and, so, others, using such arguments as 'etymology' or 'historical records' need to take some rest and not confuse us with shallow thoughts.
Abrahamic invasion compelled the people of Indian subcontinent to identify themselves as a religion to protect our culture. This doesn't mean the Britishers defined who we are.
Interesting. However, as far as I have read, the word "Hindu" was first used by Arabs to describe the people of Indian peninsula, as being of dark complexion, "Hind" meaning Dark.
Excellent talks I have been gorging on your videos for last 2 weeks. i have a doubt ? If both Hinduism and sanatan dharm are relatively new terms. what was the name Hindus were calling themselves back then ?
They would mostly identify with their region , kingdom , sect , caste , lineage , proffession and dharma was considered some value system based on varied understanding of life you live by and not necessarily identify with the way we do it now . It was rather pretty good for it's time where the ideology was put into practice rather than just merely identifying with it. What was important was you remain dharmik irrespective of which caste , sect , lineage , kingdom or region you identify with. A shared history of this very value system called Dharma is the basis of a pan India United hindu identity today.
बाकी आपकी किसी बात से मैं सहमत नहीं सिवाय एक की कि अंग्रेज़ों ने सबसे पहले हिन्दू धर्म कि अवधारणा रखी और बौद्ध, सिख और जैन संप्रदाय को एक धर्म का रूप देकर इसे सनातन धर्म से अलग करने का प्रयास किया।
How is varna decided upo birth when it is based on actions? How does a newborn have any action associated with it? Gandhi was not the most ideal person when it came to harijans so why would anyone gove a shit about him?
🪔👌🙏✊🪔 Ours is a multicultural, multi belief, multi coloured society. Whats wrong if we have hundreds of definitions of Sanatana and Dharma. We have hundreds of definitions for Dharma, and the people who came to define us were totally confused. For them Religion means one ideal god sitting somewhere above, one book and one messenger. For us any simple person who has done a great sankalpa, could be a great scientist like Abdul Kalam or JC Bose or a yogi like Ramana Maharishi or great philosopher like Shanakaracharya, who has renounced everything to tapasya achieved something great, has gone closer to the supreme and we accept them as a messenger. They just cannot understand us. Moreover their language cannot translate Indian words and its Rasa or true feeling, also their vocabulary is 10 to 15% of Sanskrit or any Indian language. So they just translate from poor translations and finally they understand nothing.
In the era of AI and various readily available tools for information verification, these kinds of people should be given Knighthood for such blatant British-Boot-Liking
Any good Hindu Historian would have quoted verses in Sanskrit not in English from different sources he was claiming , on our scriptures his authority shall not be acknowledged .
Glad to be part of your channel sir.🙏🏼.. Can you help me with the term Hinduism which we got from another community those were the outsider. ? Being Indian but the term you will give for Hinduism
Aa gaya ek aaur libru apni western philosophy zadne...ham kaise migrated hai... Ramayana and Mahabharat kaisa jhoot hai...bhai tu bol kyu nahi deta main mughloka das hu aur main British Ko pairo dhul hu
Manusmriti do not talk about Cast System it talks about Varna System which is action based classification as praised by Mahatma Gandhi Cast term is used by Portuguese first And now u r under influence of pizza effect 🙃
शैव और वैष्णव धर्म के बारे मे तो कुछ बोला ही नही? जब राजतरगिनी मे हिन्दु शब्द है तो वो अंग्रेजो का दिया हुआ कैसे हुआ? और एक बात बौद्ध धर्म भी तो हिन्दु से ही डिस्कबर हुआ है । DARIUS - I के समय मे बौद्ध नही थे? उस ने केवल हिन्दु शब्द ही ईस्तेमाल किया? सनातन धर्म के बारे मे भागवत गीता मे पुरा श्लोक है। "कुल धर्म सनातन" आप ने 'हिमालयात् समारभ्य यावत् इन्दु सरोवरम्। तं देवनिर्मितं देशं हिन्दुस्थानं प्रचक्षते॥'- (बृहस्पति आगम) की तो बात ही नही की? आप विवाद चाहते है की हिन्दुओं मे हिन भावना पैदा हो और वो धर्म परिवर्तन करे ? जब राज तरगिनी और विध्यापति हिन्दु शब्द का प्रयोग कर चुके है तो अग्रेजो का दिया कैसे हुई ?
Baat sanatan word ke first occurrence ke Ho rahi hai! Jo ki buddhist word se copy kiya gaya hai! Aur brahmin vedas ki koi strong evidence nahi hai Buddhism se pehele ki.
@ 3:40 you are quoting manusmruti as a source of definition for sanatan dharma as "to follow the rules of caste, country and family". Could you quote the verse number? You could perhaps be mis-translating the "varna" as caste or the word "jati" as caste. In non-technical conversation that may be correct, but in technical conversations one has to abide by the technical jargon ("pari-bhasha").
What is required is an open atmosphere to discuss (seemingly contradictory) ideas and accept the view that triumphs in a civil debate (Adi shankaracharya challenged Mandam Mishra for a debate with the promise of accepting Mishra's views if defeated).
And there is nothing wrong in having multiple definitions (of sanatana dharma) in varied contexts.
🪔👌🙏✊🪔
Absolutely correct. Ours is a multicultural multi belief multi coloured society. Thats the same thought when I was listening to him. Whats wrong if we have hundreds of definitions of Sanatana and Dharma.
We have hundreds of definitions for Dharma, and the people who came to define us were totally confused. For them Religion means one ideal god sitting somewhere above, one book and one messenger.
For us any simple person who has done a great sankalpa,
could be a great scientist like Abdul Kalam or JC Bose
or a yogi like Ramana Maharishi
or great philosopher like Shanakaracharya, who has renounced everything to tapasya achieved something great, has gone closer to the supreme and we accept them as a messenger.
They just cannot understand us. Moreover their language cannot translate Indian words and its Rasa or true feeling,
also their vocabulary is 10 to 15% of Sanskrit or any Indian language. So they just translate from poor translations and finally they understand nothing.
The man never talk about chhatrapati shivaji Maharaj or maharana Pratap....
He is a leftist
@@jitendramahor7755 come on bro, I see him very non biased, may be based on the topic he could not have found any link or relevance of shivaji. Let us wait and see, or you can request him to make a video on this.
The man only quotes Islamic sources everywhere. If that is not biased then what is.
Commendable research. Nice presentation.
For the real meaning and difference between the words Hindu, Hindutva and Hinduism, read the book "Hindutva" written by V. D. Savarkar. He has explained it beautifully with all the historic, geographic and religious aspects .
बहुत सुन्दर व्याख्या । मै सेन्ट्रल हिन्दू स्कूल (1949) वाराणसी का छात्र हूं। यह पुस्तक कालेज मे पढ़ाई जाती थी। Theology का कोर्स होता था। सिर्फ पास होना होता था।
शैव और वैष्णव धर्म के बारे मे तो कुछ बोला ही नही? जब राजतरगिनी मे हिन्दु शब्द है तो वो अंग्रेजो का दिया हुआ कैसे हुआ? और एक बात बौद्ध धर्म भी तो हिन्दु से ही डिस्कबर हुआ है । DARIUS - I के समय मे बौद्ध नही थे? उस ने केवल हिन्दु शब्द ही ईस्तेमाल किया? सनातन धर्म के बारे मे भागवत गीता मे पुरा श्लोक है। "कुल धर्म सनातन" आप ने 'हिमालयात् समारभ्य यावत् इन्दु सरोवरम्। तं देवनिर्मितं देशं हिन्दुस्थानं प्रचक्षते॥'- (बृहस्पति आगम) की तो बात ही नही की? आप विवाद चाहते है की हिन्दुओं मे हिन भावना पैदा हो और वो धर्म परिवर्तन करे ? जब राज तरगिनी और विध्यापति हिन्दु शब्द का प्रयोग कर चुके है तो अग्रेजो का दिया कैसे हुई ?
Unbiased explanation.
Sir, you are doing wonderful job 🙏
I am truly amazed by your explanations on each of the topics you have presented which are rich in contents and facts with rational and evidences! However, I could not find your latest videos and so far have seen only videos which are a year old..do you have other channels so I can subscribe? I can not resist listening more to your brilliant analysis covering most of the topics from historical perspectives which are enriching my knowledge in these areas...I also miss your introduction part so I could know more about you sir! It will be really great to know more about you!! I can just guess you must be a great historian or professor in history?
Samasya yaha hain ki hum 'Dharm' ko 'Religion' shabd ki paribhasha se samjhne ki kosis karte hain. Or agar aisa karenge to ham baar baar fail honge is Desh ke sahi itihaas or sanskriti ko samjhne mein.
Asal baat ye hai ki is desh mein kabhi bhi Religion jaisi cheej exist nahi karti thi, balki yahan pe 'Patth (marg)' hua karte the jinka ultimate goal Liberation(moksh) hua karta tha. Or is desh ki saari philosophy or present time me hum jinko religion se denote karte hain isi Moksh par based hain.
Yaha par aapko sagun Bhakti ka maarg milega jisme Ishwar ki bahut relevance hain.
Vahi ek dam iske ulat Nirgun bhakti ka maarg bhi hain.
Yaha par theistic tradition bhi hain like Shaiv, vaishnav, shakt etc.
Yaha par non-theistic tradition (Ishwar ki utni manyata nahi hain) like Samkhya, Yoga, Buddhism, Jain bhi hain.
Yah par Tantra hai jaha par cast system ki bilkul manahi hain or Yaha par Vedic tradition bhi hain jaha par Varna system bahut prabhaav rakhta hain.
Yaha par materialistic tradition bhi the like Charvaka jo naa to reincarnation or naa hi bhagwan me vishwas rakhte the.
To yaha par Krishna ka rebel path bhi tha jinhone Vedic god Indra ki puja karne se mana karwa diya.
To is Bharat desh ko samajhne ke liye hame isi desh ke nazariye ki jarurat hain or jab tak ham western or abrahamic lens lagake yaha ke dharmo ko samajhne ki kosis karenge to ham baar baar fail honge.
I need your help sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Nice sir 👍
rigorous research delivered in calm and measured manner..kudos
मामा जी भारत एक खोज में जब भारत में कुछ था ही नहीं तो लोगों ने भारत की खोज क्यों की , आपके सारे लेख बताते हैं कि अरब से आए मुसलमानों ने हमारी हिस्ट्री लिखी आप मिथक चाणक्य चन्द्रगुप्त मोर्य को नहीं जानते, आप मिथक गीता रामायण महाभारत वेद पुराण को नहीं जानते लेकिन आपके हिसाब से ये सभी कहानियाँ हैं
आपके हिसाब से तो शायद भारत नाम ही मिथक है
Sir keep it up , provide us such a real and informative contains 👍🙏🙂
🙏
Thank you Sir 🙏
Uncle ji i love your video ❤
Dharma and religion have difference,
Discovery of things is different than existence of things
Super 👌 sir,
Very thought provoking deep research , exploring history without being harsh on negative aspects respecting sentiments of community . Very well . Kudos to a fine and refined efforts Kaushik ji
We knew what Dharm was; the basis that upheld everything in the universe and all parts of it. Whatever name we use for refering to Dharm, it remains what it is, as an expression of natural laws in operation. So, the basis for understanding nature, the universe and everything else in it and the guidance for harmonious thought and action in it, like ethics, etc. were always ours and are still our people's Dharm. We all understand this very deeply and very well and, so, others, using such arguments as 'etymology' or 'historical records' need to take some rest and not confuse us with shallow thoughts.
Sir why do you people stop making videos?
Creator is no more 😢
Hinduism is the way of living life...roots are too deep,we can't able to dig it 👃
Very good sir..
Ek hi question,,,kya mahabharat sach me huwa tha?
Respect sir
sir what about the word bharat?
i really like your videos it's like an asmr session
excellent
Sir ,hindavi Swaraj words used by Chatrapati Shivaji maharaj.
Abrahamic invasion compelled the people of Indian subcontinent to identify themselves as a religion to protect our culture. This doesn't mean the Britishers defined who we are.
Interesting. However, as far as I have read, the word "Hindu" was first used by Arabs to describe the people of Indian peninsula, as being of dark complexion, "Hind" meaning Dark.
Excellent talks I have been gorging on your videos for last 2 weeks. i have a doubt ? If both Hinduism and sanatan dharm are relatively new terms. what was the name Hindus were calling themselves back then ?
Brilliant question. We can't answer here as it's a subject of a video in future. But thank you very much for thinking it through 🙏
'Hindus' called themselves human beings and Hinduism, to them, was Dharm.
As far as I know, the three major religions or Dharams were called, BrahamMat, BudhMat and JainMat.
@@trystwithhistory8480 when
They would mostly identify with their region , kingdom , sect , caste , lineage , proffession and dharma was considered some value system based on varied understanding of life you live by and not necessarily identify with the way we do it now .
It was rather pretty good for it's time where the ideology was put into practice rather than just merely identifying with it.
What was important was you remain dharmik irrespective of which caste , sect , lineage , kingdom or region you identify with. A shared history of this very value system called Dharma is the basis of a pan India United hindu identity today.
Wow. What a great knowledge
Sir,you are great .great lecture
So India should really go for a uniform civil code - as jentue/gentoo/hindu means all non-immigrants of greater geographical india
my previous comment was deleted on which this comment was based. And there was nothing objectionable in it.
very nice ....information thank u...sir.....
सर आप एक महान व्यक्ति हैं। और आपके विडियोज पर ऐडस् नहीं आते हैं, तो क्या आप चैनल से पैसे नहीं कमा रहे हैं???
आपकी सराहना से बढ़कर कुछ भी नहीं है।
तुक मिलाना ईसे कहते है क्या??
,🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Sir i must meet you ❤️
बाकी आपकी किसी बात से मैं सहमत नहीं सिवाय एक की कि अंग्रेज़ों ने सबसे पहले हिन्दू धर्म कि अवधारणा रखी और बौद्ध, सिख और जैन संप्रदाय को एक धर्म का रूप देकर इसे सनातन धर्म से अलग करने का प्रयास किया।
How is varna decided upo birth when it is based on actions? How does a newborn have any action associated with it?
Gandhi was not the most ideal person when it came to harijans so why would anyone gove a shit about him?
I want to meet with you
माननीय, महाकवि कालिदास पर आपकी पोस्ट का इंतेजार है.
Sir why don't you introduce yourself before taking about the topic tell us about your journey, nice video mind opening
🪔👌🙏✊🪔
Ours is a multicultural, multi belief, multi coloured society. Whats wrong if we have hundreds of definitions of Sanatana and Dharma.
We have hundreds of definitions for Dharma, and the people who came to define us were totally confused. For them Religion means one ideal god sitting somewhere above, one book and one messenger.
For us any simple person who has done a great sankalpa,
could be a great scientist like Abdul Kalam or JC Bose
or a yogi like Ramana Maharishi
or great philosopher like Shanakaracharya, who has renounced everything to tapasya achieved something great, has gone closer to the supreme and we accept them as a messenger.
They just cannot understand us. Moreover their language cannot translate Indian words and its Rasa or true feeling,
also their vocabulary is 10 to 15% of Sanskrit or any Indian language. So they just translate from poor translations and finally they understand nothing.
Such a thaught provoking lecture sir..
Thank you sir..
My pranam to you 🙏❤️
Itni saari books 😕😕
We Hindustan was not discovered we r the oldest civilized people in the world
In the era of AI and various readily available tools for information verification, these kinds of people should be given Knighthood for such blatant British-Boot-Liking
Albaruni ne bhi hindustan shabd ka prayog kiya hai fahiyan ise intuk desh kaha hai
Oshe bhi pahle ka to kuch batao ...bich she chalu kar ke bich me he khatam kar Diya ...
Very useful lecture for UPSC students.
Any good Hindu Historian would have quoted verses in Sanskrit not in English from different sources he was claiming , on our scriptures his authority shall not be acknowledged .
😳😳😳 so Hinduism is a figment of imagination starting with Al Beruni and ending with Annie Besant
No
It's just on name
Raja ram mohan was British stooge
आप whatsapp university बन्द करवा देंगे 🙏🙏🙏
श्रीमद्भागवत गीता में कई बार सनातन धर्म आया है वो क्या है
Glad to be part of your channel sir.🙏🏼..
Can you help me with the term Hinduism which we got from another community those were the outsider.
?
Being Indian but the term you will give for Hinduism
Apke he jishe history writer ke wajah se Sanatan Dharma khatam hote ja rha he ....pahle bhi yahi hota tha oor ab bhi yahi ho rha he
Sanatan dharma kabhi tha hi nahi! Tumlogoko bevkuf banaya gaya hai!
Aa gaya ek aaur libru apni western philosophy zadne...ham kaise migrated hai... Ramayana and Mahabharat kaisa jhoot hai...bhai tu bol kyu nahi deta main mughloka das hu aur main British Ko pairo dhul hu
Ramayan aur Mahabharat ka proof kya hai? Koi archeological evidence? Tum yahi ke Ho but tum hindu nahi the. Tumhe banaya gaya hai.
Manusmriti do not talk about Cast System
it talks about Varna System which is action based classification as praised by Mahatma Gandhi
Cast term is used by Portuguese first
And now u r under influence of pizza effect 🙃
Not up to the mark.i can debate with you.wrong most places
शैव और वैष्णव धर्म के बारे मे तो कुछ बोला ही नही? जब राजतरगिनी मे हिन्दु शब्द है तो वो अंग्रेजो का दिया हुआ कैसे हुआ? और एक बात बौद्ध धर्म भी तो हिन्दु से ही डिस्कबर हुआ है । DARIUS - I के समय मे बौद्ध नही थे? उस ने केवल हिन्दु शब्द ही ईस्तेमाल किया? सनातन धर्म के बारे मे भागवत गीता मे पुरा श्लोक है। "कुल धर्म सनातन" आप ने 'हिमालयात् समारभ्य यावत् इन्दु सरोवरम्। तं देवनिर्मितं देशं हिन्दुस्थानं प्रचक्षते॥'- (बृहस्पति आगम) की तो बात ही नही की? आप विवाद चाहते है की हिन्दुओं मे हिन भावना पैदा हो और वो धर्म परिवर्तन करे ? जब राज तरगिनी और विध्यापति हिन्दु शब्द का प्रयोग कर चुके है तो अग्रेजो का दिया कैसे हुई ?
Baat sanatan word ke first occurrence ke Ho rahi hai! Jo ki buddhist word se copy kiya gaya hai! Aur brahmin vedas ki koi strong evidence nahi hai Buddhism se pehele ki.
@@fazer79 गाण्डु जाकर बौद्ध ग्रंथों दिर्घ निकाय अन्तर्गत तेविज सुत्त, बहायुु सुत्त, असलायन सुत्त पढ ले.. असलायन वैदिक ब्राह्मण था।
Jain discover hota hai, buddhism discover hota ha ??!! Thoda bahut aap bhi christianize ho gaya lagtha hai !
Kyu ki unke archeological evidence hai! Hindu ke kuch nahi! Sab jain aur Buddhists ke temples ko hadpa hai Brahmanone!
guys this channel gives wrong information
Why do you have to use colonial terms like caste when you’re translating “Varna” or “jati”? You’re speaking Hindi, aren’t you?
Am unsubscribing…
Does it change anything?
Not up to the mark. Very disappointing.