Gram Schmidt Process

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024

Комментарии • 60

  • @danielarreola6217
    @danielarreola6217 6 лет назад +14

    I'm a simple man. I see linear algebra, I like the video.

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay 4 года назад +1

    I've spent 2 days just trying to understand what this process is even attempting to do, and in the first 3 minutes you have totally done it. Thank u so much, sheesh!

  • @Ruvine_
    @Ruvine_ 2 года назад +5

    I love your videos. You're great explainer. It's awesome to see that things we had to learn by heart on university are in fact so logic and simple when you explain them.

    • @DipsAndPushups
      @DipsAndPushups 5 месяцев назад

      I was reading my textbook and this process looked like magic, I had no idea what was going on and now I understand it. The textbook has a lot of drawings in it but it is simply not a substitute for a professor explaining it while drawing in real time and pointing to the drawing. Textbook can only go so far. Obviously if it is not a good professor it won't matter but Dr Peyam is a good professor.

  • @jeromesnail
    @jeromesnail 6 лет назад +2

    At first I was confused because I was like "don't we need a set of 4 vectors to make a base of a 4-th dimensions space?" And then I realized we only wanted to find a base for the span of {u1,U2,u3} which is three dimensions...
    Great video, I love linear algebra. One of my favorite topics in mathematics :)

  • @ЧешскийдлявсехЧехай

    It was a very big surprise when I found your video. Before that I have seen only Calculus videos! Thank you for your work

  • @amarpaudel5777
    @amarpaudel5777 2 года назад

    The way you mix humor to make it entertaining is amazing!!😅❤

  • @DipsAndPushups
    @DipsAndPushups 5 месяцев назад

    Great video! I couldn't understand what this process was doing by reading my textbook and now I understand it!
    Just for those that may not understand (or for future me, I often forget things that I understand once), the reason why
    û2 = v1 times (u2 dot v1 / (v1 dot v1))
    is because of the following:
    ||û2|| = u2 cosine the angle with v1
    ||û2|| = (u2 dot v1) / ||v1||
    if you do ||û2|| v1 you will get a vector on the same line as v1 (good), but its length will be ||v1|| multiplied by ||û2||, instead of ||û2||.
    Therefore, we need to divide the result by ||v1||.
    So, û2 = v1 ||û2|| / ||v1||
    û2 = v1 (u2 dot v1 / ||v1||^2)
    û2 = v1 (u2 dot v1 / (v1 dot v1))

  • @proalexv
    @proalexv 5 лет назад +1

    Super clear and straight to the point, great video!

  • @GhostyOcean
    @GhostyOcean 4 года назад +1

    This video, along with Kahn Academy's video on basis, helped me finally understand the G.S. orthonormalization process. Thank you!

  • @MegaTRIANGULUM
    @MegaTRIANGULUM 6 лет назад +1

    Great video as always!! More linear Algebra!! It's fascinating how much you can achieve with vectors and matrices

  • @allyourcode
    @allyourcode 3 года назад +1

    Linear algebra is amazingly intuitive. I learned about this many years ago, and have not applied it since. Yet, within the time you spent to introduce this (< 1 min), I was able to fully reconstruct how it works. Not sure why this is a good thing tho lol (need to watch more of your videos I ges :P). Also, there are of course, infinitely many orthonomal bases (for the same space). Not so sure what's so special about the one that GS spits out. You could also do the vectors in any order, so for an original basis with 3 vectors, you have 3! = 6 possible basis that GS can generate for you, each giving different "preservation priority" to the original 3 vectors.

  • @snowy0110
    @snowy0110 3 года назад +1

    I instantly feel better when I see that smile :)

  • @saragh29
    @saragh29 Год назад

    Super clear. Thank you Dr Peyam

  • @tmann986
    @tmann986 2 года назад

    I’ve been trying to understand this topic! Thank you!

  • @yangwang9688
    @yangwang9688 3 года назад +1

    I have an interesting question: if I have a set of representation vectors (distributed vectors), what would happen after operating gram-schmidt on those vectors? Let’s assume the dimension of the vector is 300, and we have 10 observations. What’s the best interpretation for these orthonormal vectors?

  • @shasaeagle
    @shasaeagle 3 года назад

    Very clear presentation. Can you also cover the lanczos method?

  • @koenth2359
    @koenth2359 6 лет назад +10

    3:53 Now I finally find out what WTF means

  • @MrCigarro50
    @MrCigarro50 6 лет назад +2

    Thank you Dr. Peyam. For us, Statisticians, your videos are really important. This specially is useful. The one on Lebesgue Integral...Fantastic. Can you do the Riemann-Stieljes Integral? this one is very important to us because it allow us to ignore the difference between a discrete and a continuous random variable without the extreme complications of Lebesgue.

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад

      Thank you!!! And I’ll think about it; I can definitely see how Riemann-Stieltjes is an intermediate between the two

  • @myonlynick
    @myonlynick 6 лет назад

    you explained it better than my £65 textbook. Kudos

  • @AndDiracisHisProphet
    @AndDiracisHisProphet 6 лет назад +10

    When I was in my first semester my professor once talked about "Otto-normal Basen". I thought "WTF are those? And what is the opposite? Ungewöhnliche Basen?"
    Boy was I wrong :D
    (also, this comment probably won't make any sense if your german is not so good^^)

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад +3

      Hahaha, got it 😂😂😂

    • @Gold161803
      @Gold161803 6 лет назад +1

      Use the Chen Lu!

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen 6 лет назад +1

      AndDiracisHisProphet
      You are right, I didn't get it

    • @AndDiracisHisProphet
      @AndDiracisHisProphet 6 лет назад +1

      Don't be sad. It isn't that funny anyway. More of a situational thing.

    • @blackpenredpen
      @blackpenredpen 6 лет назад

      oh ok.

  • @aglobalphenomenon9074
    @aglobalphenomenon9074 6 лет назад +1

    Second Like for this lovely video by the lovely Dr. Peyam :)

  • @Sporkabyte
    @Sporkabyte 6 лет назад +1

    Could you do a video about the existence of bases for infinite dimensional vector spaces? Your videos are great and always very helpful

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад

      That’s a great idea! I’ll think about it :)

  • @bogdancorobean9270
    @bogdancorobean9270 6 лет назад

    I was actually looking for videos about the Gram-Schmidt process a few hours ago. What are the odds??

  • @Gold161803
    @Gold161803 6 лет назад

    Is it extraneous to check the given vectors for linear independence first?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад

      Linear independence is important here because otherwise the Gram-Schmidt process will spit out the zero vector!

    • @Gold161803
      @Gold161803 6 лет назад

      The horror!! Haha I thought so, and I know all of that is usually implied, I was just making sure :)

  • @yuvalpaz3752
    @yuvalpaz3752 6 лет назад

    Well, I dont really have something to add this time but i do have a question: why do you instead to write v.v as [....].[....] and not just ||[....]||^2? it is shorter.
    Oh, I start watching the Measure Theory series of "Fematika", it is pretty good

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад +1

      I like u.u because it looks more like hugging, hahaha.

    • @yuvalpaz3752
      @yuvalpaz3752 6 лет назад

      Dr. Peyam's Show I should have known this...

  • @tomatrix7525
    @tomatrix7525 4 года назад

    Peyam, I am afraid to say I think u are making me like linear algebra

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  4 года назад

      Oh no, hahaha 😂

  • @vanessakitty8867
    @vanessakitty8867 6 лет назад

    Wonderful, thank you kindly.

  • @TheMauror22
    @TheMauror22 6 лет назад

    Love this topic!!

  • @123bruzzel
    @123bruzzel 6 лет назад

    Could you please solve more PDEs?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад

      There’s a PDE-ish topic coming on Friday!

  • @weirdsciencetv4999
    @weirdsciencetv4999 Год назад

    I like this guy

  • @ElifArslan-l9g
    @ElifArslan-l9g 2 года назад

    thank you

  • @nullplan01
    @nullplan01 6 лет назад

    shouldn't you rationalize the denominators?

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад

      Not necessary for an orthogonal basis. For an orthonormal basis you need to rationalize it, but just at the end!

  • @morbidmanatee5550
    @morbidmanatee5550 6 лет назад +2

    Dr. Peyam. I love your videos. I am a physics phd too lol. But, I beg you, use lower case letters. It is painful to see everything spelled out like that. It feels like you are yelling at us. There is always time to change :). I beg you, oh please :)
    Otherwise, I love your work!

    • @drpeyam
      @drpeyam  6 лет назад +2

      I can’t, unfortunately. If I write in lower-case I’d have to write in cursive, and most people can’t read cursive handwriting.

    • @morbidmanatee5550
      @morbidmanatee5550 6 лет назад

      Try it ;) I know you can do it :D I love your enthusiam!

  • @rybaplcaki7267
    @rybaplcaki7267 6 лет назад

    Yes first!!!

  • @naeemtahir6434
    @naeemtahir6434 3 года назад

    You are talented man but please when you writing something don't stand front of white board.please don't mind I am extremely sorry.

  • @SkillUpMobileGaming
    @SkillUpMobileGaming 9 месяцев назад

    WTF {v1, v2, v3}