John J. Mearsheimer - "The Great Delusion - Liberal Dreams and International Realities" - 7.11.18

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 13

  • @influenciaindebida
    @influenciaindebida 2 года назад +10

    Three years ahead from today's events

  • @brucevilla
    @brucevilla 3 года назад +2

    Thanks for Uploading.

  • @xnownxinc5680
    @xnownxinc5680 2 года назад +2

    Mr Putin just went ballistic literary. 🙄

  • @silversmith8176
    @silversmith8176 2 года назад

    Yup!

  • @arranmorfeld1991
    @arranmorfeld1991 2 года назад

    Why give a “title” to how we live and care for our young… is there a prefix to the word Family..? Is the a prefix like “liberal or national” to the word life..?

  • @vikramnandakumaran2434
    @vikramnandakumaran2434 6 лет назад

    where is the Q&A guys

    • @cassisunibonn6915
      @cassisunibonn6915  6 лет назад

      Sorry, we had to cut the Q&A due to audio problems. Will include it next time. ;-)

  • @manubrigid7718
    @manubrigid7718 2 года назад

    👏👏👏👏👏

  • @arranmorfeld1991
    @arranmorfeld1991 2 года назад

    The English word “individual” already means - not Divided.. consider the suffix of - dual .. not dual.. … I suggest we all be very careful with the language and it’s etymology, before we talk about what right I/you claim under that “title”. 👍🏻

  • @simony276
    @simony276 2 года назад

    American exceptionalism is an disillusion.

  • @canteluna
    @canteluna 5 лет назад +2

    I don't agree with the premise that just because liberalism is based on "individual rights" -- which assumes a priori rights -- that that means the focus of liberalism is on the individual as opposed to the society Just because one begins with a premise that assumes a priori rights doesn't mean that one denies that one is a social being foremost. I reject the distinction. Liberal welfare state nations all recognize a priori human rights while at the same time also assuming a social good (or goals) precisely because humans are social beings and we live, not as individuals but in societies. Contrasting this with the idea of nationalism is, frankly, a contradiction of the premises on which our system of government is founded. No one disputes we are born into a social group, tribe, whatever you want to call it, but that in itself is not nationalism, that is simply a rationale for xenophobia. All born in the US could be "nationalists" but the distinctions between us based on group identity is NOT a definition of nationalism.