Chapter 4.3 - Moment of Couples- Vector Formulation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 дек 2024

Комментарии • 61

  • @ryandiaz3417
    @ryandiaz3417 3 года назад +10

    my professor skimmed over this like it should be second nature, thank you for the explanation of this concept

  • @km.010
    @km.010 7 лет назад +14

    For anyone not understanding the rotation conclusion of the forces, just pretend you are holding a steering wheel and imitate the forces with your right and left hand. Which way does your wheel rotate?

    • @yolarola6261
      @yolarola6261 6 лет назад +2

      thank you very much. I had put so much thought, i just did not see it. and thanks to this comment I now do :)

    • @naomiwebb3268
      @naomiwebb3268 4 года назад

      you are a life saver

  • @hamzaabdalla2958
    @hamzaabdalla2958 5 лет назад +2

    oh man you saved my life and I really appreciate your help. once again thank you so much.

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  5 лет назад

      You are welcome

  • @elishaadiburoadimalara4687
    @elishaadiburoadimalara4687 5 лет назад +2

    Sir you are simply fantastic
    Great job

  • @jesussaquin6266
    @jesussaquin6266 2 года назад +1

    youre the boss man I understood it first time

  • @xlGotStridelx
    @xlGotStridelx 8 лет назад +2

    amazing amazing amazing, you sir are a grade-saver!!

  • @1963rzr
    @1963rzr  9 лет назад +7

    Nathan Anthony, when using couples, you just care about the distance between the forces.

  • @Tha12345
    @Tha12345 4 года назад +2

    YOU SAVED MY LIFE !

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  4 года назад

      life saver...

  • @jennyvilaflor3034
    @jennyvilaflor3034 4 года назад +2

    Thank you Sr for this .May Good bless u

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  4 года назад

      So nice of you. you too

  • @changkeeloon8600
    @changkeeloon8600 2 года назад +1

    Tq very much for saving my results!

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  2 года назад

      Glad I could Help

  • @brave385
    @brave385 8 лет назад +2

    at 11:58 it should be 8/5 not 9/5, right?
    also in the second example you didnt use the 350 mm given, is that because there is no force at the origin?

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  8 лет назад +1

      Hello,I don't understand the first question... Regarding the second, if you do summation of moments, you must use the 350 mm; however, when doing it by applying couple principle you only need the distance between the two parallel forces.

  • @zubaidahrusli6738
    @zubaidahrusli6738 7 лет назад

    thankyou so much for helping. may you success in life. all the way from malaysia 😀

  • @zedrickestevanez8907
    @zedrickestevanez8907 6 лет назад

    I was actually failing my rigid mechanics , but still I want to prepare for my 2nd take I'm not an engineering material but still I wanted to become one thankyou for this.

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  6 лет назад

      You are welcome! Don't give up!

  • @YuVeeMohJoeSaajAmi
    @YuVeeMohJoeSaajAmi 9 лет назад +3

    thank you so much you a life saver

    • @lifewithgift512
      @lifewithgift512 6 лет назад

      Please Wat is d name of the textbook used.

  • @jesussaquin6266
    @jesussaquin6266 2 года назад

    Will couple forces always be given in a I j k component?

  • @yolarola6261
    @yolarola6261 6 лет назад

    best explanations for people with add!

  • @Robtmmartine77
    @Robtmmartine77 8 лет назад

    Im trying to do problem 4.93 and I cant figure out how to get the coordinate points, even after looking at the solution.

  • @cyrillemagdi7717
    @cyrillemagdi7717 8 лет назад

    Is it easier to draw a perpendicular and solve it without resolving the forces ??

  • @selmanabd2782
    @selmanabd2782 8 лет назад +1

    at 11:58 it should be 8/5 not 9/5, right

  • @rahulchandradas2636
    @rahulchandradas2636 5 лет назад

    At the time of couple moment, which point we have to take????

  • @antonnyny
    @antonnyny 8 лет назад +4

    muchas gracias : )

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  8 лет назад +2

      de nada. recuerda darle "like" a todos los videos

  • @colombiadude1
    @colombiadude1 4 года назад

    Isn't Clockwise direction negative and counterclockwise a positive direction?

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  4 года назад

      nope... it is as you assume it to be

  • @jooyceking1662
    @jooyceking1662 2 года назад

    Why don't i get the first solving?

  • @Ashish-hl7rk
    @Ashish-hl7rk Год назад

    How to differentiate 2d snd 3d

  • @1963rzr
    @1963rzr  9 лет назад

    you are welcome

  • @spraycool1251
    @spraycool1251 9 лет назад +1

    Why didnt you add the 350mm to the x-axis.

    • @spraycool1251
      @spraycool1251 9 лет назад

      +Nathan Anthony Is it because A becomes the new origin?

  • @lowabunny2
    @lowabunny2 8 лет назад

    Isn't clockwise negative and counterclockwise positive ? On question 1 you have it reversed? Or am I mistaken

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  8 лет назад +2

      In reality there is no "positive" or "negative". the direction should be either "clockwise" or "counterclockwise". if you clearly specify your assumption and convention it shouldn't matter. I can say... lets assume clockwise is positive in order to do the summation... if the final result is negative, then the direction will be counterclockwise (or vice versa). The only "Fixed" consideration is when working with concentrated moments for the Moment diagrams.

    • @zedrickestevanez8907
      @zedrickestevanez8907 6 лет назад

      basically before that class starts the professor should classify the legends(basis) for the direction and signs to be use for the whole semester ?

  • @BaljinderSingh-tf2sn
    @BaljinderSingh-tf2sn 4 года назад +2

    are you an italian sir??? i love your accent!!!!!!

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  4 года назад +2

      italiano? ma che dice!

  • @fshepherd4221
    @fshepherd4221 8 лет назад

    Thanks Really helpful

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  8 лет назад

      you are welcome. Remember liking all of them

  • @kamranramyar
    @kamranramyar Год назад

    Not understanding the rotation😢😢😢 please help

  • @enthalpy-1804
    @enthalpy-1804 7 лет назад

    Thanks dude

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  7 лет назад

      Jason Cabral welcome dude

  • @AustinCS
    @AustinCS 7 лет назад

    Wait but why is 2+2 = 4

  • @Dylan-nn2hy
    @Dylan-nn2hy 5 лет назад

    I calculate F to equal 229.29.......anyone else?

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  5 лет назад

      Apparently not...

  • @maythwehtun2117
    @maythwehtun2117 5 лет назад

    Lolll, u made statics simpler

    • @1963rzr
      @1963rzr  5 лет назад +1

      Nope..
      I made it THE EASY WAY :)

    • @maythwehtun2117
      @maythwehtun2117 5 лет назад

      @@1963rzr do you have a channel for dynamics too?

  • @AdrianGonzalez-pg2fc
    @AdrianGonzalez-pg2fc 6 лет назад

    Eres Cubano?