Fabulous and Funky Fifties Fighters
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- Fabulous (and not) U.S. Navy fighters undergo carrier suitability trials. Featuring the McDonnell F3H "Demon", Vought F7U "Cutlass", Douglas F4D "Skyray" and A4D "Skyhawk" aboard the USS Ticonderoga (CV-14) in September, 1955.
The Skyhawks survives all others "things" and continue to flying in many air forces, what a Fighter!.....56 years in service!
Love these planes, too. The Demon kind of looks like a proto-Phantom II, and the A4D was (is) a fantastic little attack jet.
Funny you should say that. The Mcdonald F3F Demon was the predecessor to the Macdonald F-4 Phantom II.
@@JustaPilot1 The first prototypes of the Phantom were actually called Demons, the F3G.
@@JustaPilot1 AWESOME
Thanks for the post. I love these old planes--they have so much character.
I think the Demon is a cool plane---all it needed was a J79!
Other than the A-4 it is amazing how short the service life for these planes were. You can see quite a resemblance to the Phantom in the demon.
The Demon directly led to the Phantom.
McDonnell came up with a twin-engine (and also modular) Demon variant, known as the F3H-G. It served as the comptetitor to the F8U Crusader, but never made it past the mockup stage.
The F3H-G was then re-tooled into the XF4H-1 Phantom in 1959
You can see how the F-3 was developed into the F-4. I remember when I was a kid in the 60s we had a toy Skyray and Cutlass and I thought they were super cool looking. They still look cool, but I guess they didn't work out as well. The A4 had a long service life, very utilitarian.
I also love the looks of the delta-winged Skyray and Cutlass. The F4D Skyray was one of the first model kits I built as a kid. While it had a short career, it was developed into the supersonic F5D Skylancer that was used for NASA research into the 1960s. A Skylancer flown by Neil Armstrong is on display at the Neil Armstrong Museum in his hometown of Wapakoneta, Ohio.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_F5D_Skylancer
The main problem with these cool planes was the lack of powerful enough engines! Some were really amazing,flying wise. They just didn't have the power or reliability from those early jet engines.
I remember having a toy aircraft carrier with plastic Cutlasses that launched from a spring catapult...the number on the boat was 59...
@@tomcline5631 The X-3 was a similar case. Very cool looking plane -- very extreme, anyway, but underpowered. Just as well, because they couldn't control it so well, either. Maybe if they had modern computer controls, like on the F-117, along with powerful engines, it would have really been something. It did provide research valuable for the development of the F-104 Starfighter.
@@TubeNotMe That was the one with the long nose with the canopy flush with the surface right called it the Stiletto. If that's the one,yeah it was beautiful,yet didn't have enough power to get out of it's own way! I think the control problems would have rectified themselves with more powerful engine,thus more speed. That super thin narrow span wing needed speed to perform.
Yep a really cool plane with lots of potential,with a weak sister engine! Take care.stay healthy.
Reminds me if the OLD Discovery Channel show Wing's. I miss that show !
They're on here... you just have to look.
Under powered, over weight jets that flew like wet sheep at slow speeds... must have been a terrifying experience landing on those TINY aircraft carriers that were built for WW2 prop driven fighters.
Could anyone have imagined then that the A-4 Skyhawk would still be in service and flying with the Blue Angels over 30 years later? Not to mention, serving as an adversarial fighter at Top Gun. The A-4 put all of those other aircraft to shame.
When technology isn’t up to par....simplicity rules!
Only wars make fast evaluation of aircraft and tactics. No war- no good aircraft.
...while most of the aircraft shown in the footage were in service only for a short time.
Nice video! Yep, the USN had an interesting hodge-podge of planes in the 1950s. And the 4 planes featured here also had all different engines: Allison J71 (F3H), Westinghouse J46 (F7U), P&W J57 (F4D) and Wright J65 (F4D)! Must have been a maintenance nightmare...
crazy to see that A-4B out there when all the rest are absolute museum pieces now. Skyhawks still goin strong👏🏼
Who would've thought that a POS like the F3H would be followed up by arguably the best fighter of its generation - the F-4 Phantom II.
@Richard McCaig bad engines make a fighter a POS. HE'S RIGHT.
The Ford was head and shoulders above the rest.
Yeah, it was a pretty plane. Too bad it was subsonic.
@@jarvisfamily3837 Yes. Apparently, a fun plane to fly. Some are in private hands now and flown for kicks.
Demons were a very good machine. The later versions had more power. They were called 'the chair' by pilots because the handling and visibilty from the cockpit was so good. The Demon was directly developed into the F-4 phantom. A phantom is mostly just a twin engine two seat demon.
About a dozen A4s still flying but the rest, long gone, indeed some of these didn't even get to get Tri-Service Designations.
But oh my, can you smell the future?
Just think, 10 yrs earlier these carriers had F6Fs F4Us TBDs etc.
The carrier appears to still have a straight deck. The F7U "Cutlass" was a neat looking aircraft; unfortunately it was a terrible aircraft due to weak powerplants and the long nose strut.
It got the nickname "Gutless".
@@johannbezuidenhout2976 An artist I follow drew an F7U and we both wondered how well it would operate today with more powerful powerplants. I even wondered if the Navy would adopt it because of its so outrageous design.
The A-4D outlast and outclassed all of them. Great 👍post.
A-4's forever!!! I worked on the A-4 E,F &M and T/A-4J at Top Gun, NAS Miramar from 89-93. I was a Plane Capt. and Aviation Structural Mech. I miss the old A-4. It served our country heavily in Vietnam and later in aggressor squadrons and at Top Gun. It also served as the Blue Angels from 1974(I think) until 1986. @koivis87, I wasn't in power- plants, but I believe the Skyhawk had a Pratt & Whitney J-52 engine.
It was the J52 for it's powerplant. My father flew over 194 combat missions in A4s. They were a great plane and that is why the Navy kept them around for so long.
The New Zealand Airforce retired their A-4Ks in 2001 and sold them in 2012...
Always liked that Skyray . They got a lot of use out of the Skyhawk.
The A-4 Skyhawk were tough little jets, very capable for their size.
@@trespire The A-4 Skyhawk was a real workhorse and very maneuverable. It wasn't supersonic, but it did great job over many years. I was in the Navy air squadron VAQ-33, out of N.A.S., Norfolk, Va., from 1971-75. We had 4 of these A-4's, along with other aircraft. I got to calling these small A-4's the 'mosquito' because that's what they reminded me of..LOL..!! Remember that they replaced the great F-4 Phantom in the Blue Angels. That was a big let-down for me. Those amazing big and menacing F-4's and their fantastic afterburners were incredible to see and hear when the Blue Angels had them. Compared to the F-4's, the A-4's were a big yawn. But I have come to appreciate just how versatile and maneuverable and useful a role that the A-4's played; not only for the U.S., but for other Countries as well.
The F4D and the F8U used the same engine. The F4D Skyray was built for one purpose: to launch off a carrier deck and get to altitude quickly to intercept a Soviet bomber. It did this and still holds records. It was the only Navy aircraft that could climb vertically while accelerating. It was retired because the Navy could no longer afford single mission aircraft.
The F4D and the A4 were both designed by the Douglas genius, Ed Heinemann.
They seem to be showing the Demon off even though it too was a slug compared to the A4 and Skyray.
The Gutless Cutlass killed a lot of pilots.
Not really, in absolute numbers. There never were very many of them and they weren't around very long. But it sure is fun posting edgy comments without having the data.
thank you so much
You sure can see the Phantom's ancesrty in that F3h!
Yeah - there was only one major difference - the F-4 could fly. With the F3H it was always a question...
The voodoo and the Phantom are similar in size. I have the Squadron Signal InAction book on the Demon. It has a section where they were proposing a two seat Demon with two engines. They had a mockup and the photo looks a lot like the F-4.
I wasn't speaking out of my but on this. I have published info to back it up.
"It has almost nothing in common except the general layout, and the raised tail." Almost nothing is sometimes something.
The Navy in the mid 50's had some funky looking planes. The A-4 Skyhawk was the only plane featured in this video that had a long-lasting service career, serving throughout the Vietnam War, even when the A-7 Corsair II was replacing it. Skyhawks were very useful on the smaller Essex and Midway Class carriers because of their small size. They also saw a long career as an aggressor craft for pilot training. The late 50's saw a number of iconic and memorable aircraft begin their service careers, the F-8 Crusader, A-3 Skywarrior, and A-5 Vigilante would see service over the skies of Vietnam. The F-4 Phantom would join them by the beginning of the 1960's.
If The Demon had 2 engines it would be awesome.
When I was a kid, I made model aircraft. I had all of these planes.
I've always wondered how they manage to build that spindly looking nose gear so strong the cat doesn't rip it off..
The catapult wasn't hooked to the front landing gear. They were using a cable hooked between the catapult and hooks under the fuselage. The sling was used once only and fell into the ocean at the tip of the catapult.
Demon was a subsonic disappointment, but was the primary platform for sparrow missle until replaced by its derivative - the legendary F-4 Phantom.
That was really cool, thanks for the share.
Most tricycle planes are balanced on the rear wheels; doesn't take much to lift the nose wheel, because it has to be easy to rotate. On a carrier jet, especially with these old school airfoils, they had to be very nose-high to begin with, so they'd be at an appropriate angle-of-attack to launch. This attitude, plus the lack of weight on the nose-wheel meant that it would bounce, particularly when the fuel was empty. Steering was with the brakes, so it didn't matter, so long as it didn't tip!
Ah 144p the Fabulous Funky Potato of Video, pretty awesome for about 30 sec. We actually watched this stuff, lol.
I did not try to watch it....It was kinds like the first TV we had in the early 50's....It lit up.....As a little child I though it was a Radio with a light on it...lol...!
In someway, airplanes are beautiful.
F4D was slightly successful but overtaken by supersonic types. Cutlass was largely a flop. A4 skyhawk was Vietnam legend, still a good bomber today if you don't need V/STOL.
The "Gutless" didn't get the engines it needed, but it did ultimately influenced the plan form of the wonderful F/A-18. Likewise, the Demon and the Phantom. I knew two guys who'd flown Demons before they got F-8 Crusaders. As much as the F-8 was an "adventure" to trap at 150+ kts, they preferred it by far to the F3H. I knew several others who'd flown the Ford and loved it. Ed H. =knew= airframes.
Gutless Cutlass....at least the Crusader saved Vought.
The Cutlass was cool looking. That was about the only good thing about it. It was underpowered, had unreliable landing gear, structural issues, and was responsible for killing 25 pilots.
The F7U, aka the "Gutless" due to its lack of climb speed, was a bad planform with good avionics and a well-designed wing root. The Cutlass' folding wingtips and wing angle were incorporated into the F8 Crusader, but with a better (single) engine and a whole-wing trim control for the quasi-delta wing.
Cameron Ferguson cutlass was a good airplane, had they added leading edge slats and more powerful engines the Cutlass would have Bern a world beater.
The Gutless was let down by the engines being not powerful enough and the design was based around the engines proposed power, the all hydraulic flight control system was not reliable enough. The biggest issue going on to a carrier deck was that massively long nose strut that in some of the F7U-1s and -2s would bump into the bottom of the pilot seat causing an ejection. Pilot reports from the Cutlass all said when she was operating properly it was a fantastic airplane to fly, responsive, stable and if it were not for the powerplants, she could have been pretty fast for the day too. The Blue Angels used one maybe 2 for a couple of seasons as the solo slot, but they sent it back because the engines were unreliable, and the flight control system was too advanced for the day.
Completely badass. Born too late.
Oh look it's a baby Phantom II lol.
Good looking aircraft
Wow, the USN went thru some bizarre designs until the F-9, F-11, F-8, F-4....Demons, Skyrays, Cutlass’....
I love these old jets! Too bad they had such short service lives ( with the exception of the A-4) Once the F-8 Crusader and then the F-4 phantom entered service, they all quickly disappeared. The Demon, Cutlass and Skyray were all underpowered and by the time they were upgraded it was already too late.
The one thing the F4D Skyray was NOT was underpowered It had a huge engine in a smooth light weight airframe. It held time to climb records for years and years.
poor li'l cute guy. like so many airplanes of the era, the engines were it's downfall. So much lost potential :(
Kevin Rollins yeah
Ikr, so many beautiful aircraft, so fucking cool.
Well yeah, early engines were good or were just primitive and trash. Or even had potential and just needed a little elbow grease to fix.
I wonder how many of the crews on those ships and pilots fought in WW2?...If they have, imagine them seeing and witnessing the coming of the jet age...
ponchai allen probably not too many crew, but I’d bet the pilots had.
Note which aircraft did not do the final flyover at the end of carrier trials...because the aircraft didn't finish the trials. Whoops.
+TheShocker Shocker Or, they returned to base early. No need for sensationalism with no basis.
The MD F 3 does has some resemblances to the future F4 Phantom
The McDonnell empennage , F-88, F3H, F-101, F-110, oops, I mean F-4
There's at least one clip around here where the Phantom-II is referred to as the F-110 on the original celluloid.
Well the F4 was developed from a revised plan to upgrade the F3... I like to think of the F3 as a baby or juvenile F4 lol.
I did not try to watch it....It was kinds like the first TV we had in the early 50's....It lit up.....As a little child I though it was a Radio with a light on it...lol...!
What year were the Essex carriers converted to angle deck? utilizing side elevators etc
Engines flamed out a lot , compressor stalls, afterburner blow outs etc etc.
Thank the Lord they went to the unified system of aircraft designation.
Yes.
Total mess back then.
That is an extreme exaggeration. The F3H and the Phantom share almost nothing aside from a common purpose (missile-armed fleet interceptor), and the very general layout, with the raised tail over the engine(s), low wing, center-fuselage fuel tanks and the side-mounted intakes. The fuselage structure is different, the wing is different, the tail is different, the Phantom is much larger, etc. There's more difference than between, say a Wildcat and Hellcat. The F-101/F-4 have more in common.
Note how someone (?) scrubbed the identifying nose numbers off the Cutlass planes shown here. And aside from the foxy 'go-get-em' music, the narrator says some of these landings were intentionally arrested off center (for endurance, performance purposes of the Cutlass). Now wonder if some of the color films here had actually been taken aboard the Hancock, c. 1950s, during which it was filmed in B&W showing a Cutlass taking the catwalk, with resultant fireball and loss of lives. See official US Navy B&W (16mm films) of that accident, then compare to the home (color) movies also seen on youtube, and the comments I've made about this elsewhere. Appears patriotism wins out, even if disastrous for our pilots in the making.
@biukucanoe The Demon certainly wasn't on par with the Phantom, but for its era it did its job, FAR from a disappointment for the needs of the moment. Since the F-8 couldn't do night fighting, the Demon had to fill in for it on carrier defense at night. No other fighter served as well at the time it was in its prime.
DoctorShocktor ji
There was no A-4D Skyray. When he says it, it is showing a Skyhawk. This guy keeps mixing up the two different planes, the A-4D Skyhawk and the F-4D Skyray, showing videos of each randomly alternating.
Again, they were two DIFFERENT planes.
What's up with the Demon after landing. Looks like a puppy sitting on its butt - even the front wheel lifts off the deck. Tail heavy? Never saw any carrier plane do that so bad before.
The Scooter is the only one that turned out to be a top notch machine although the Demon also had a pretty decent service record.
Heinemann's Hot Rod :-)
Cold War propaganda film...They flew amazing with minimal payload and minimal fuel. Once they loaded them, the flying became dangerous or required the carrier to steam closer to the target before launching. Only the A-4 lived up to expectations. Jets couldn't easily reproduce the radial engine's throttling response during takeoff and approach. Too much turbine lag and weight was a lethal combination.
The cutlass is so beautiful *__*
The Cutlass was a cool looking air craft. Too bad it was such a dog.
Wow! some wierd fat alien looking aircraft. i didnt knw the A4 was so old. out of those onlt the A4 continued. i cant believe how old these aircraft will be today! over 50 yrs! its amaizing how quickly jet aircraft evolved and boosted into production!
The Navy had a lot of unsuccessful jets in the 50's.
Panama Canal be damned, seems the smart move would be to have giant 2 hull carriers catamaran style with a yuge flight deck between them. I mean, carriers are nuclear powered now, so fuels not an issue. How often do you need to get through the canal anyway? you could carry more planes, ordinance, supplies. Porting might be a problem, but its a problem now with gigantic single hull carriers. Of course that might save too much money and the pentagon wouldn't like that at all.
Hobgoblin1975 Hey bro! None of our nuke carriers can go thru the canal now!
Hobgoblin1975 yeah, you know why that wouldn't work? Because the hulls move relative to each other.
Go for trihull with full fore and aft bulkheads, redundant protection from hull damage taking you down.
They don't have strong enough materials to handle the stresses a catamaran style aircraft carrier would develop.
That Allison J71 killed the Demon. If it had been re-engined with the Pratt & Whitney J75, and redesigned intakes, it could have been an all-time great. Too bad.
I was just admiring its MD family resemblance to the Phantom.
Notice the "Gutlass" wasn't in the flyover at the end. God that was a worthless bird. Chance-Vought really messed up with that one. Agreed there were some innovations but as a whole, DEATH TRAP!
Agreed.... but it was a neat looking model for a 12-year-old kid to put together!
The biggest problem with the Cutlass was the Westinghouse jet engines. One disgruntled pilot remarked the companies' toasters put out more heat than the jet engines they build. It was designed to take the XJ-40 as was the F4D and FH3. The engine was a complete failure. The weak J-46 was substituted.
Chance-Vought had two losers going into the Jet-Age with both the Pirate and the Cutlass. Vought redeemed themselves with the F-8 Crusader and later the A-7 Corsair II.
One day they'll look back on all the old FA18E/Fs, F35s F22s and old electromagnetic catapult tech.
The Demon gave a lot of flight deck personnel hearing problems owing to its high pitch whine. The Cutlass killed a lot of pilots and nothing much came out of the Skyray. One of the shortcomings of the Skyhawk was loading the 20mm ammo cans into the plane. Heavy and awkward.
Given the title, I would like to recommend Bootsy Collins for the voice over work. ruclips.net/video/2Sh9cezHNec/видео.html
At 5:30 ... check it out. Is he going to make it ? What an ungainly aircraft the F3H Demon was. Just watching all this action in this film you can tell each of these pilots are highly qualified test pilots. Once a Cutlass or a Demon got into the hands of a low time pilot ... I bet it was a different story.
Stirring music
was für eine Shit-Qualität einem zugemutet werden kann. Zuerst habe ich geglaubt,dass meine Brille angelaufen ist. Aber NEIN ,es war das Video selbst ! Besser nichts ,als sowas.
I Wonder how They Match Up vs Mig -17s, and 19s?
The A-4 was good.
In Air War Over Vietnam How Many Migs Air Victories?
My god how many terrible aircraft other than the Skyhawks can you have on the deck at once. Run for your life everyone!
Yeah a lot of these planes were failures or semi-failires.
The A-4 was in production for 25 years, and the USMC didn't retire them until 1998 (40 year service). Israel was still flying them until 2015.
Too bad the F7U had underpowered engines, always dug the unconventional design.
The F7U was such an ugly, crappy airplane. If there was a flight simulator that wasn't an addon where I could fly the F7U in combat, I would always fly it to mess with people.