M1128 Mobile Gun & 30mm Stryker Dragoon (ICVD) In Action

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
  • U.S. Army Soldiers shoot the M1128 Mobile Gun System and the 30mm Stryker Infantry Carrier Vehicle - Dragoon (ICVD) during training exercise Dragoon Ready at Grafenwoehr Training Area, Germany on October 17, 2018.
    Film Credits: U.S. Army Video by Gertrud Zach and Markus Rauchenberger
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    Have a look at The Gung Ho Vids Amazon Store.
    Military Style Gear, Gaming and More. Link Below:
    amzn.to/3jq9vLx
    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Комментарии • 145

  • @skranq
    @skranq 2 года назад +112

    That Sound of the casing hitting the ground 👌

  • @WindFireAllThatKindOfThing
    @WindFireAllThatKindOfThing 4 года назад +147

    BAE: So, I see you want us to actually put real guns on the Stryker. What kind of guns?
    Army: Yes.

    • @ffandrewd2986
      @ffandrewd2986 3 года назад +3

      Lol

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 года назад +3

      Looks like the ACV gonna pull the Marines in the same direction. Everybody wants that sweet, sweet strategic mobility.

  • @m1a1abramstank49
    @m1a1abramstank49 3 года назад +96

    Gaijin :*Hullbreak on the MG shield*

  • @samathythemanathy8112
    @samathythemanathy8112 Год назад +8

    0:40
    "John we are a little dusty"
    "Say no more"

  • @theendurance
    @theendurance Год назад +5

    0:38 i love how it just rolls up, shrouded in camo, fires a shot, and dips lol

    • @Skankhunt-jy2zu
      @Skankhunt-jy2zu 3 месяца назад

      "Driver backup!" Dunno what for exactly tho

  • @nazirulnaim5418
    @nazirulnaim5418 2 года назад +10

    I always love when the RWS 105mm gun instantly eject the shell after firing.

  • @badcompany2685
    @badcompany2685 5 лет назад +55

    Wish there was optic scenes to see them hitting targets.

  • @jurzyjohner432
    @jurzyjohner432 5 лет назад +24

    Love the sound of fire in the morning, GOD BLESS AMERICA'S MILITARY.

  • @gdurant
    @gdurant 2 года назад +20

    Amazing series of the United States army's medium armored Force which is by far the best in the world. Yet another reason the United States army cannot be beat.

    • @beingsentient
      @beingsentient 2 года назад

      It looks like you're not paying attention. The US army has been beat by peasants in Vietnam, people wearing sheets and sandals in Afghanistan, and if not beat, incapable of winning the so-called War on Terror, which it created and maintains by utter stupidity, and the Military is now costing us over $4 Billion PER DAY, when you include all military/intelligence expenses, including interest in the debt caused by military fiascos. Not to mention the million people killed, mostly civilians, and the 50 million refugees created. In fact, we're creating more enemies than the people we kill, and in the meantime China builds up its economy and establishes economic connections in South America, Africa and Asia. China just made a deal to buy Russian oil and pay for it with Euros. That means it's the beginning of the end for the dollar, and once that happens the US people will actually have to do something to earn the funds to live, not simply print money out of nothing. The country will then nose dive down faster than a Kamikaze.

    • @oni8721
      @oni8721 2 года назад

      @@beingsentient "Print money from nothing" - what about inflation in that case? (No offence, pure curiosity).

    • @beingsentient
      @beingsentient 2 года назад

      @@oni8721 Your question doesn't compute. Elaborate please.

    • @oni8721
      @oni8721 2 года назад

      @@beingsentient I mean you said in your mesage: "Print money from nothing", but isn't that would be bad for an economic of the country? - Inflation would skyrocket in that case, is it not? - Or am I wrong?
      Money becomes worthless if too much is printed. If the Money Supply increases faster than real output then, ceteris paribus, inflation will occur. If you print more money, the amount of goods doesn't change. However, if you print money, households will have more cash and more money to spend on goods.

    • @beingsentient
      @beingsentient 2 года назад +1

      @@oni8721 Aren't you aware that the US government creates dollars out of nothing? If not, do some Google research.
      I don't think your assumption that money from trees will necessarily lead to inflation. It leads to borrowing, which increases the National debt. But as long as the dollar is the world's "reserve currency," other countries will buy dollars; i.e., take out Treasury Bonds. The US winds up with that foreign money, but has to pay the interest on the bonds. In other words, the bonds are a form of debt for us, and we must pay interest on that debt.
      When other countries no longer have faith in the dollar, they won't buy it. The US government then has no buyers for its paper money it printed from trees. When that happens, we will be like any other country. We will have to sell real goods that others consider worth buying. By that time there may be other, more trusted currency, perhaps the Chinese one. That means those other countries will pay us in the Chinese currency, and we will buy goods from them using the Chinese currency and the Chinese will start printing money out of nothing.
      I think the ideal situation would be for many currencies to be trusted and that many different currencies will be used to for international buy an sell.

  • @texturk6092
    @texturk6092 4 года назад +37

    Name a more iconic duo than a 50 cal firing a few rounds and jamming

    • @TheLegendaryHitter
      @TheLegendaryHitter 4 года назад +6

      A 40 mm bofors cannon ripping through enemy vehicles

    • @renzovergara3436
      @renzovergara3436 4 года назад +1

      an m1919 ripping through nazi german souls

    • @bullet996
      @bullet996 4 года назад +2

      School shootings and America XDDDD

    • @acesirr
      @acesirr 4 года назад +4

      @@bullet996 Not cool man.

    • @Ravenwood06
      @Ravenwood06 3 года назад +1

      @@bullet996 eating dogs much

  • @EH76239
    @EH76239 5 лет назад +13

    That fucking 105 mm gun... still deadly as ever

  • @antikoerper256
    @antikoerper256 5 лет назад +5

    How can you not love the M1128, check this shit out! CHECK OUT THE RECOIL AND THE SHELLS FLYING OUT MAN

  • @marckurtz9410
    @marckurtz9410 5 лет назад +8

    Kickass ! For you mutants, it was a trading exercise to test new equipment!

  • @axehammer3850
    @axehammer3850 5 лет назад +34

    Not sure how true it is, but I have heard that they made a launcher that holds 4 Hellfire missiles. They also fired Javelin missiles from one of these.

    • @matthewspears6932
      @matthewspears6932 5 лет назад +3

      I know they have or are developing versions with Hell fires and stinger missiles.

    • @RexSpec
      @RexSpec 4 года назад +12

      That's the M1134 ATGM platform. It launches two BGM-71E TOW missiles. Not too common, but still devastating. lol
      Fun fact: The TOW missile that the M1134 uses is the same TOW missile that the M2A3 Bradleys use.

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 4 года назад

      But why? The Hellfire is already getting replaced by the JAGM.

    • @JAnx01
      @JAnx01 3 года назад

      @Ishay Levin The JAGM is an upgraded Helfire. And this upgrade should make less platforms almost as effective as the AH-64D Longbow without all the Longbow tech.

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 года назад

      @@JAnx01 helicopters, drones, and strike aircraft are going to get priority for the first JAGMs, but there's still going to be a large number of leftover Hellfires that shouldn't go to waste, and beefing up the anti-armor firepower of the Stryker brigades is a good way to use them up.

  • @jeffuthoff8622
    @jeffuthoff8622 5 лет назад +8

    Awesome weapons platform, can see where rubber tires ciuld pose problem. Cool gyro system on big bore artillary!

    • @lancefry7299
      @lancefry7299 4 года назад +3

      No problem they have tire pressure control

  • @franzcruz2198
    @franzcruz2198 2 года назад +2

    the m1 garand of tanks. it has that pinging sound

  • @30-e_fevralya
    @30-e_fevralya 4 года назад +31

    Congratulations from Russia! Very good combat vehicle👍👍👍👍

    • @ye4606
      @ye4606 Год назад +3

      🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺

    • @ngtstr
      @ngtstr Год назад +2

      ​@@ye4606 💀

  • @correspondance1
    @correspondance1 4 года назад +21

    LOVE IT! would work well for the Botswana Defence Force

    • @louiecanl
      @louiecanl 4 года назад +1

      No

    • @correspondance1
      @correspondance1 3 года назад +1

      @Eric Ickx i doubt, thats a South African vehicle..

    • @bobmartin9918
      @bobmartin9918 3 года назад +2

      @Eric Ickx While the Botswana ground forces have quite a multinational collection of assets, they do not have the Rooicat at their disposal.
      Sources: I checked wikipedia. If you find from a more reliable source that Botswana DOES have some then please show it.

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 года назад +2

      @@correspondance1 we may sell many of them soon and replace them with the M8 Armored Gun System light tank, the US Army doesn't like them because the 105mm cannon wears out the suspension quickly and the armor is too light.

  • @TheMrPeteChannel
    @TheMrPeteChannel 4 года назад +6

    Those look like titanic style rivets on that turret 😯.

  • @lumanoderechte
    @lumanoderechte 2 года назад +4

    0:44 😍

  • @decodeddiesel
    @decodeddiesel 5 лет назад +3

    Those autumn leaves thou!

  • @Alexx120493
    @Alexx120493 2 года назад +3

    2:43 any reason why they would fire the RCWS by hand ?

    • @oxide9679
      @oxide9679 2 года назад +1

      It's a manual override. Anyone can fire it in TV/joystick mode. Gotta keep your gunners trained up on manual fire mode

  • @corollavirus4age
    @corollavirus4age 2 месяца назад

    0:43 now i know here they got the Desert eagle sound from on Codmw

  • @mcemtpockets1775
    @mcemtpockets1775 4 месяца назад

    Sooo cool

  • @adlaiferrell8188
    @adlaiferrell8188 5 лет назад +5

    Stick a 155 mm on a Stryker and use it with fast reaction units😎in between artillery

    • @ghostcamaro5409
      @ghostcamaro5409 5 лет назад +1

      105mm

    • @psnglck20
      @psnglck20 4 года назад +5

      That would break the struts on it, the 105 on the mgs models are already doing it

    • @TacticalOkuu
      @TacticalOkuu 3 года назад

      They tested an artillery version, not much came out of it IIRC.
      Also, Strykers have hydro suspensions, they are designed to recoil like that.

    • @m1a1abramstank49
      @m1a1abramstank49 3 года назад +1

      How to fuck the suspension

    • @RyuzoSan19
      @RyuzoSan19 3 года назад

      Pretty sure they already have mortar carrier variants for this.

  • @juliewhite7066
    @juliewhite7066 5 лет назад

    aw good ol graf. was there 75 and 76. 1st bn 33rd armor gehlhausen. don white tread head

  • @phillip_iv_planetking6354
    @phillip_iv_planetking6354 2 года назад

    Wish I had one of these for the front yard.

  • @alexbazin4291
    @alexbazin4291 3 года назад +2

    Do members of the 75th ranger regiment get assigned to strykers like normal infantrymen do?

  • @stephennelson4954
    @stephennelson4954 4 года назад +12

    Ladies and gentlemen and people of all ages I present to you the most satisfying sound in the world 0:42

  • @tristanguzman3115
    @tristanguzman3115 2 года назад +1

    Strykers > BTRs no contest. 🇺🇸

  • @adlaiferrell8188
    @adlaiferrell8188 5 лет назад +4

    Iran and North Korea go coo coo sometimes 😎

  • @pauljackson6044
    @pauljackson6044 5 лет назад +3

    Interesting that the shell still exists, some of them burn up...cannot remember the name for them though.

    • @LilJordan02
      @LilJordan02 5 лет назад +1

      I’ve heard it’s simply called caseless

    • @gmanky
      @gmanky 5 лет назад +1

      105 mm

    • @DESTRUCT0NAT0R
      @DESTRUCT0NAT0R 3 года назад

      I know what you're talking about.
      www.quora.com/How-does-the-M1A2-get-rid-of-spent-shells

  • @Fish-kz8xw
    @Fish-kz8xw 5 лет назад +4

    When did the gun fires became a music? Like in my captions it says music.

  • @epictarget423
    @epictarget423 Год назад

    That cannon sounds hits harder than it's anti tank round

  • @sarttee
    @sarttee 3 года назад +1

    the problem with the stryker is they are not adding in all its weapons. You should be able to switch to the tow missiles 30mm cannons etc.

    • @onemorescout
      @onemorescout 3 года назад

      they already have the Bradley though

    • @sarttee
      @sarttee 3 года назад

      @@onemorescout the bradley and Stryker fire different missiles and they've added bmps and bmds

    • @rain_f
      @rain_f 2 года назад

      @@sarttee weight restriction, they can only mount some weapon in that light chassis. That's why they have several different Stryker on a platoon. Also, Stryker ATGM have the same missile as Bradley

  • @kosmokamikadze1285
    @kosmokamikadze1285 3 года назад +1

    Это круто👍

  • @highteirgod
    @highteirgod Год назад +1

    The AC-130's ground equivalent

  • @christopherlawrence8742
    @christopherlawrence8742 Месяц назад

    I loved the M1126 ICV i was the gunner on in Iraq. I miss that truck

  • @ibc5520
    @ibc5520 2 месяца назад

    It's like a garand with a ping sound...

  • @TheAngriestGamer.
    @TheAngriestGamer. 5 месяцев назад

    35mm BM3 would of been better imo for the Stryker and bradley but i dont get to make the calls..

  • @verdebusterAP
    @verdebusterAP 5 лет назад

    Nice

  • @acecombat2shill
    @acecombat2shill Год назад

    the gun of the dragoon not recoiling kinda fucks with me tbh

  • @inkedseahear
    @inkedseahear 3 года назад

    I can't tell if the first couple of the MGS firing was the same shot in different angles?

  • @Jaeywa
    @Jaeywa Год назад

    It’s either between this or m1 garland ping

  • @sontruong2052
    @sontruong2052 3 года назад

    Tuyệt vời lắm 👍

  • @h3lldiv3r
    @h3lldiv3r 5 лет назад +7

    So is it jack of all trades,master of none?

  • @andreribeiro696
    @andreribeiro696 5 лет назад

    Melhor do que aspirador de pó

  • @mystyle_jm8997
    @mystyle_jm8997 3 года назад +1

    Any chance that USMC Stryker 30mm Variant will be playable in "Armored Warfare Online Game"?

  • @SuperRobotMen
    @SuperRobotMen 4 года назад

    Elite army

  • @BLacknesmonstaz
    @BLacknesmonstaz 5 лет назад +1

    Hahaha awesome.

  • @sortuhretard7990
    @sortuhretard7990 5 лет назад

    Fuck yeah!

  • @diligentone-six2688
    @diligentone-six2688 5 лет назад

    They should've added the TOW Missile.

    • @BadCo92
      @BadCo92 5 лет назад +3

      Diligent One-Six they have atgm on strykers too

    • @yaboibradleyburgerking162
      @yaboibradleyburgerking162 5 лет назад +3

      They have tow missiles and a new thing that is maybe being made has a pod Stinger missiles a pot of Hellfire missiles 30 millimeter cannon and a coaxial 762 machine gun all on the same turret it's basically anti-everything

    • @ultraman5168
      @ultraman5168 3 года назад

      Every infantry Stryker that isn't getting a 30mm Bushmaster cannon is getting a CROWS-J upgrade to launch Javelin missiles alongside the remote controlled machine gun.
      As others have mentioned, there is also the M1134 Anti-tank Guided Missile Vehicle with TOW missiles, and the upcoming IM-SHORAD with Longbow Hellfires. The Mortar Carrier vehicle also has anti-armor capability through the DPICM cluster munition and the PGMM guided mortar round.

  • @Ken-jw4xk
    @Ken-jw4xk 5 лет назад +33

    Might have to deploy a few of these to the U.S. Mexican border in a few weeks.

    • @kellerweskier7214
      @kellerweskier7214 5 лет назад +5

      for what? is Mexico going to invade soon? otherwise, you cant open up on unarmed civilians, unless you want to give the Good America, a bad name.

    • @puccakoolz1
      @puccakoolz1 5 лет назад

      @colonel 100 fuck you stupid kid . Go back to your shitty Battlefield gaming . Get the fuck out of this military channel.

    • @TacticalOkuu
      @TacticalOkuu 5 лет назад

      @colonel 100 "magatards". that the best you got?

    • @DMNSMN
      @DMNSMN 4 года назад

      Yeah, I hate illegal immigrants, come in illegally where we have to pay for them to stay "illegally". You obviously don't have a job or a family to feed.

    • @renzovergara3436
      @renzovergara3436 4 года назад

      @@DMNSMN no family to feed?
      what if the immigrant comes with a family?

  • @skyportalmusic7178
    @skyportalmusic7178 2 года назад +13

    Jesus Loves You

  • @orgcoast5990
    @orgcoast5990 5 лет назад

    Are the large bores 105's or ????

    • @TuSoKa67
      @TuSoKa67 5 лет назад +7

      Yes they are actually the same main gun as an M60 Patton

  • @Jazzychd
    @Jazzychd 2 года назад

    In real battle field all that metal is waste, when you are out for aiming. All those telescope is for submarines.

  • @adlaiferrell8188
    @adlaiferrell8188 5 лет назад +2

    I hope all strykers ammo can penetrate Chinese or Russian tanks in case a conflict erupts..😎

    • @WindFireAllThatKindOfThing
      @WindFireAllThatKindOfThing 4 года назад +1

      So do the crews.
      Lets hope this doesnt become another Sherman or Bradley fiasco

    • @KuiperShaina
      @KuiperShaina 4 года назад +1

      Older Russian and Chinese tanks. They're using the M68 105mm, which is the same gun as the M60 Patton, and early gen M1 Abrams. It's not bad, but not great either. I guess if they rocked DU shells, they'd get the penetration they need. But it's not very likely. As a quick reaction, and ambush vehicle however, I think it could absolutely excel.

    • @TheMrPeteChannel
      @TheMrPeteChannel 4 года назад +1

      @@KuiperShaina one of its rounds it uses is the spin stabilised sabot penetrator. Not sure if its DU or Tungsten.

    • @RyuzoSan19
      @RyuzoSan19 3 года назад

      It would only be good for ambushing since 105mm APFSDS rounds cant really take on a T-90M or a ZTZ-99 head to head.

    • @TheMrPeteChannel
      @TheMrPeteChannel 3 года назад

      @Alex Beall ah, ok.

  • @dahlak3739
    @dahlak3739 5 лет назад

    Which tank this one america,britain,france,or germany

    • @dahlak3739
      @dahlak3739 5 лет назад

      @@demanischaffer ok thanks brother!

    • @ibrahimsafwat
      @ibrahimsafwat 5 лет назад +7

      It's an apc called "Stryker"
      It's fucking badass

    • @gabetaylor28
      @gabetaylor28 5 лет назад +1

      emosh73 quantity and training beats quality. The Russians can’t afford most of their equipment. Remember that new t14 armada? They have 2. Just 2 tanks. You have no naval power, and a weak air force. Please explain how Russians are better at anything, when they can’t afford anything, let alone have the manpower

    • @TuSoKa67
      @TuSoKa67 5 лет назад +1

      It's not a tank and it's American

    • @AChillPirate
      @AChillPirate 3 года назад

      @@gabetaylor28 Not only does Russia have more than just two T-14s, they’re also planning to acquire a ginormous fleet of them. I suggest you do more thorough research next time instead of talking out of your ass, so you don’t make a complete fool out of yourself

  • @TellenJones
    @TellenJones 9 месяцев назад

    Army is less impressed with the Stryker that has mobile gun tho.

  • @magnificamasonska8387
    @magnificamasonska8387 2 года назад

    0:44 You killed the enemy on the other side...
    I think the personnel inside the vehicle died... how does it vibrate... this vehicle is so bad...

    • @oxide9679
      @oxide9679 2 года назад +1

      You mean firing this system kills its own crew?
      The human body is NOT that fragile

  • @ChamberSpell
    @ChamberSpell 2 года назад

    this things a beast lol