Third Side of the Cold War DOCUMENTARY
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- 👉Try FilmoraGo Video Editor: bit.ly/3v9tRu2
👉 Learn video editing tutorials: bit.ly/3casiBK
Our historical documentary series on the history of the Cold War continues with a video on the Non-Aligned Movement, which basically acted as the third side of the conflict not joining NATO or the Warsaw Pact countries. This movement was led by Egypt, Yugoslavia, India, Indonesia and others and was declared in 1955 in Bandung.
What Happened to the German and Japanese POWs?: • What Happened to the G...
Operation Paperclip: • Operation Paperclip - ...
German Expulsions: • German Expulsions Afte...
Soviet Education System: • Soviet Education Syste...
How Khrushchev Fed the Soviet People: • How Khrushchev Fed the...
Novocherkassk Massacre 1962: • Novocherkassk Massacre...
Soviet Tourism: • Soviet Tourism: How di...
Soviet Passport System: New Serfdom or Reform?: • Soviet Passport System...
Kaliningrad: How Russia Got a Stronghold in Europe: • Kaliningrad: How Russi...
How the Soviets Won the Early Space Race: • How the Soviets Won th...
Support us on Patreon: / thecoldwar
RUclips membership / @thecoldwartv
✔ Merch store ► teespring.com/...
✔ Patreon ► / thecoldwar
✔ Facebook ► / thecoldwartv
✔ Instagram ► / thecoldwartv
#ColdWar #NonAlignmentMovement #Documentary
![State of Play | September 24, 2024 [ENGLISH]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fVs0suPHAX8/mqdefault.jpg)
👉Try FilmoraGo Video Editor: bit.ly/3v9tRu2
Finally I found this topic in you tube
This was the original meaning of the term ' third world ' , it just meant a country not aligned to nato or the Warsaw pact . That meant that both Sweden and Switzerland were third world countries . Yes that term has definitely changed its meaning .
Some call it 'repurposed'. Some call it 'misappropriated'.
Either way the term holds little merit in economics today, if classification is the goal, and not just general talk.
Switzerland, Austria, Sweden and Finland were actually refered to as neutral countries, which is different from being a non-aligned country.
@@invidusspectator3920 The reason being that they were very much at the center stage of the Cold War and also lead no active efforts to create a third alternative to the big blocs.
yep some people misinterpretated "third world countries" as some under-developed countries even until today.
@@perjakacinema I mean when the countries just so happen to have specific characteristics. Is hard to not misinterpret it
Gamal Abdel Nasser once stated:
"The genius of you Americans is that you never make clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which make the rest of us wonder at the possibility that we might be missing something"
At least America’s leaders were competent enough to feign intelligence back then now nobody is under the illusion that they have something special up their sleeve when their contemporary leaders are so abysmal
Ironic considering he took power with the help of the American Government lmao
@@sirsurnamethefirstofhisnam7986 no American leader since theodor roosevelt was intellegent
@@sbevexlr848 Not LBJ?
@@leonodonoghueburke4276 not LBJ
*cold war exist*
Indonesia, India, Egypt, Yugoslavia, etc:
"We gonna do what's called a chad centrist move"
Lumayan lah 😂
"We'll build our *own* block, with blackjack and hookers!"
*Imagine aligning towards NATO/Warsaw pact
*THIS COMMENT MADE BY NON ALIGNMENT BLOCK*
@@alahsiaboi8909 *sigma rule grindset song intensifies*
Switzerland for last 500 years
A non-aligned movement summit was held last week in Belgrade, Serbia, which strangely coincided with the armament expo.
There are armament expos?
@@Game_Hero Yes there are.
Non aligned with what?
To stay non alingned you need lots of gun to make sure no one can force you to become alligned
yeah, strangely enough, Russia was there in an observer position
I can respect why many nations wanted nothing to do with either America or Russia. Because what was going on between them both wasn't pretty. My compliments to all those who made this video a reality.
Very worse again Europe like UK, France and the rest of West Europe (except Germany for a logical reason maybe).
Because both are dumb lol. SO EXTREME.
The best system is mixed system. Or at least socialism.
Capitalism n Liberalism is bad.
So is Communism(both government style n economic system).
And Indonesia's system is actually mixed.(supposed to be mix of them but now under Jokowi presidency, their economic is into capitalism and their government into the dictatorship)
And islam itself work on mixed stuff.
@@DBT1007 Dude i'm not even sure what to call it anymore
@@DBT1007 Socialism is worse than Capitalism any fucking day.
@@DBT1007 i live in a post socialism country (Czech republic)
Socialism harmed us so badly we haven't recovered to our first republic era yet.
What you want to say is that Social Democracy is a good mix of both, in which I agree. But full on socialism or laissez-faire capitalism are both really bad for their own reasons
The building where the Bandung Conference took place is still preserved and features an exhibition of the conference as well as mannequins placed in seats where the delegates were so when you visit it, it looks as if you're watching the historic event unfold.
@@syaondri Bandung is cool but its so hard to go everywhere with car lol
It has one of the best public toilet too. Never have i seen a public toilet that fresh and unhaunted as that building in Bandung
But the traffic is AWFUL here. Especially in weekends. I went there once and it was pretty cool though
Benerr, Om
@@yezki8 Unhaunted? Ghosts use toilets??
Finally someone (outside) talks about this. REMEMBER! Non aligned does not mean lack of bilateral relations. It's like being friendly to anyone without being part of their group.
The nonalignment movement was successful at helping third world countries to boost their international ties and boost economic and political cooperation. Panama received a great back up and from the movement when the negotiations for the recovery of the land of Panama Canal started.
The movement helped many african countries gain their independece, particulary in North Africa. It's no wonder the most resistancr came from western "democratic" countries, not the soviet.
Sadly if major countries of the movement werent recovering from destruction of post WW2 and deonolizations wich robbed them much of needed resorces.The movement itself wouldve been 100x times more effective bcs then for Example Yugoslavia nd India wouldnt need to spend huge amount of money to recover their own country first but woudl be ablte to put more money into expansion and development of the movement alongside boost alot of otehr counteirs that woudl like to trade and cooperate and boost the cosntructioon of ports and important infrastructures that are tied to trading and that way directly and indirectly boost otehr branches of production.
we (Yugoslavia) needed visa for only 6, later 5 countries.. life was good.. really really good .. good form of socialism
Tell that Iraq , Lebanon and others that USA made them hell in the 50s and 60s
@@goranstojanov1160 Just for the record, people often forget that the reason why the USA outperforms a relatively similar sized Europe is not some kind of mythical economical superiority but rather the simple fact that US-Americans work _a lot more_ on average ( givin rise to the infamous Europeans work to live, Americans live to work sentiment ) and also that nearly all of Europe went through some of the worst destruction of its entire history, followed by decades of fairly hostile occupation under an pretty unefficient regime pretty much less than a century ago.
Sadly post 1965 Soekarno was “usurped” by Soeharto and he began to lean more towards the west, starting with communist purge of 1965-1967, and culminating with the invasion of east timor which practically voids all of Indonesia’s pledge towards anti colonialism before it, such a shame.
After the fall of Soeharto, its replacement, BJ Habibie did what a sane person would do, started a referendum in order to release East Timor and allow for self determination, then we restart our free and active non aligned policy again, with varying level of success each year
The problem was during confrontation happen. If Malaysia won't break the treaty will be stable but yea since the U.K won't give the independence (even they decolonize hut still have the U.K connect) so that makes Soekarno was angry also the Philippines also many generals have been not loyal for reasonable like yea they have been paid or something exchange for intelligence so not a big surprise for bloody hell U.S.A, the U.K has a role if they have to purge against commie but with awful and not bring the court of rights.
Good thing sukarno was toppled. You could be arrested only for playing beatles songs....lol.
@@MultiDivebomber Nah it was because of what the U.S.A have done to do with Indonesia by coup Permesta. If you say good things that would be awful because human rights in New Order just yea that means you oppose and they will be executed you.
@@PitunghereTNOschizo100 If suharto didn't take the initiative, TNI-AD will be led by red generals. With PKI having so much power and full backing from the army, just imagine what will happen when Sukarno passes away.
@@MultiDivebomber Not really, remembers what Aidit and Kahar were worried but also they made a fatal mistake why? because they just do that in secret not public. But since every figure out of Aidit and the rest of PKI is out of Java doesn't know for this so they are getting blunder as a result after the '30s happened all private who involved getting worse like tortured until they admit they are PKI meanwhile they are not, execute people without trial and reasonable and worse Nasution who actually thrown Soekarno and change Soeharto he get down and expelled from his ranks, also their policy was good but no longer because corrupt (KKN) was growth and fist of the military was used even they actually use Dwifungsi (2 functional of the army as politics) but that's made more worse because they are yea just betray for themselves. Irony was it ?
The basic principle of NAM was called "peaceful active co-existence", worth mentioning. Also, President Tito was very clear on many occasions: no, NAM is not "the Third Bloc". That is crucial to understand NAM.
Technically, it was. These countries all shared the sentiment that they wanted to coexist and further their interests without committing to either the west or the east. They may not have shared an army or comparable institutions to either the NATO or the Warsaw Pact but ultimately, when looking at the grand scheme of things, the "bloc" was politically active ( contrasted by a completely neutral place like Switzerland ) and also interested in strengthening its own position although not to defeat the other blocs.
In conclusion, while it is not a third power in the sense of the Warsaw pact , it’s level of organization and political activism leaves little room for the idea that it was not a bloc in its own right, distinct yet comparable to the more (in?)famous alliances.
@@Arcaryon winner winner chicken dinner 🥘
funny how misunderstood the term "third world country" is. Generally it is interpreted something like "third class citizen" when really it's more like "third party candidate" or "taking the third option"
post cold war it should be a badge of honor more than else. I bet vietnam would have preferred staying 3rd world country.
Having lived during the Cold War and served in the Military during that time in the later half 75 - 85. I love your channel as it fleshes out the history of the Cold War from its beginning to its end ( if it really ends or just changes form). Thank you for this awesome channel =)
I commend the effort taken in making this video. This is a topic not known by a huge amount of people outside the member countries of the movement and is often ignored in the broad narrative of this phase of history. A huge thanks for making this video.
By an Indian.
I agree I studied the Cold War here in Britain as part of my history/politics degree in the 90s and the main topics were Europe and the east/west divide there.
Good luck to India in its issues with China although I’m sure India can deal with China 👍
A Brit
INDIA AND BRITAIN WILL COOPERATE RO COUNTER CHINA AND INDIAN
@@nigeh5326
Lmao good luck with that
*India is literally surrounded by Chinese influence while at the same time America aka the backstabber also doesn’t truly trust India and has disliked them since the 1970s*
It also doesn’t help that China has lobbying in the UN and the U.S which makes whatever India says completely useless.
India managed to get all of it’s neighbors against it in some form idek how
1: Pakistan as usual is it’s main enemy
2: China as usual is also a main enemy
3: Sri Lanka has Chinese debt and a bad past with India
4: Nepal wants no dam Indian or Chinese influence
5 : Bhutan doesn’t care
6: They recently losing their influence over Bangladesh
7: Myanmar works with China which makes it an Indian enemy
8: Afghanistan was lost to the Taliban which the Pakistanis support
See how fucked India is in it’s own neighborhood ? They managed to fuck up big time
Also they somehow managed to betray Russia for America to go against China , when somehow America was the one to build up this modern day CCP China
The more you look at it , India played itself which the silly Indian nationalists can’t admit
I never knew about this, been watching History Channel for years. I’ve learned more from your channel than anyone. Keep up the great work.
@@jtgd no I stopped watching History Channel waaay before 2005, switched to the then Military Channel but soon cut the cable cord and discovered RUclips channels.
@@garyfrombrooklyn like 10 years ago I got super into the Military History channel which was basically a 90s video dump of the History archive. I haven't seen it for a long time
@@greenkoopa yeah, they revamped it I think. Good analogy though, 90s video dump 😆
Hard to learn this stuff in Ice Road Truckers 🤣. Honestly don't know why they didn't try to cover it, like AHC.
How the History Channel explains the Cold War:
It's Aliens 👽
Just a sidenote for non-indonesians, Soekarno and Soeharto ARE NOT the same people, people tend to confused the two together as the same person whenever we talk about the history of politics in Indonesia
The book "The Darker Nations" by Vijay Prashad is a great read on the subject. Thanks for covering this!
Washington bullets...
So this channel chooses to ignore the bombing of the Kashmir princess and the attempt assassination of Zhou enlai on his way to the Bandung conference?
"America was weary of this new movement"
No they were instantly and aggressively hostile to it in every way
Lmao, USA is selfish. And let's not forget despite being one of the founders, Indonesia was quite... Let's say, 'romantic' with Soviet Union. USSR didn't seem to have much problem with NAM, well not as much as USA, USSR was interested in friendship, tho. Indonesia offered nearly no help in this friendship but the possibility of befriending a large neutral country that has the ability to grow exponentially in later years make USSR quite affectionate.
Indonesia even have its own communist party as a sign of sisterhood. Ofc, later on, the communist party revolted, killed many national heroes savagely, tried to shake one of the five pillars of Indonesia, and the nation was purged in a civil war that has Sukarno, the first president who hate imperialist UK and USA, fell from his position and got replaced by Suharto who cut off our friendship with USSR and started leaning more to USA.
There's a reason on why many Indonesians still believe CIA from USA has a hand in Sukarno's fall and Indonesia's New Order (Dictatorship), everything after Sukarno's fall gave fortune to USA. The thing that Sukarno would never consider giving USSR was given to USA easily. A bunch of cunning leech.
I hate communism just like every other Indonesian, but most of us don't actually believe USSR is the reason of the revolt. USSR was reluctant to dip their hands on Indonesia's politics back then, since Sukarno was already pretty clear in his neutrality and strict conduct.
@@arthurmorganSUN you're right, but also the nonsense killing of leftist by the new order is unnecessarily brutal.
they even overtrown soekarno and replace him with a dictactors that more close to the west
@@dorian4646 even tho the Doctors who did the autopsy were saying they just got shot and none as brutal as Soeharto's Journal during the search and rescue op. PKI does did nasty stuff but Soeharto also did his part in more worse manner too
@@estehtix true that
10:05 It looks like some poor buggers parachute didn’t open.
My man forgot to wear one
In my country Indonesia, the Bandung Conference is taught in schools as some kind of national pride. Indonesia's first president, Sukarno, is portrayed as one of the world's leader. NAM was also a national pride, especially when Indonesia held the chairman position.
Unfortunately, NAM had never have geopolitical significance. The members, including Indonesia, broke the Bandung princioles. For example, Indonesia annexed East Timor in 1976. NAM members also fought wars against each other. India vs Pakistan, for example. And they both eventually aligned to either side of the Cold War (Pakistan to US, India to Soviet). North Korea invaded South Korea. Vietnam aligned with Soviet. Cuba as well, so far as triggering the missle crises in early 60s.
NAM was, and is, just a BS.
Annexation of East Timor is one of the idiot things among many Soeharto ever done.
Okay but Timor Leste already independent, so we can say Indonesia as the founder back to NAM ideology again
@@totoabubakar1008 yes, but we can't ignore the fact that NAM doesn't have any agenda whatsoever for the past decades. US, China, Russia, Iran, Saudi, all have places in geopolitical chess board, but not NAM. Nobody take NAM seriously.
The bunch of misfits with impractical agenda. It was impossible to follow all 10 principles. The important point however is NAM despite not following what they committed to, is still a success and after the 1991, the world has become more and more multiploar, NAM members have their golden age being historically non-aligned and multi-partnered.
I'm in Belgrade right now and a few weeks back all the diplomats of the non-aligned movement came here, and the place where their meeting was talking place was right across the street from my school. It was huge, teh whole city was covered in flags and a bunch of roads we're closed.
Ah, one of my favorite aspects of cold war, back in highschool days, these stuff are often learned when it comes to history class
Years later, it's come to alive once more in this video, thanks :)
Finally someone made video about Non aligned movement. Bcs these countries may not as fancy in popular culture such vietnam war, korean war , etc. But not fueling the conflict is the most respectfull idea .
Good overview of the Bandung Conference and Non Aligned Movement.
The irony is that many of the NAM countries deviated from the 10-points of Bandung. Indonesia and Burma became dictatorships. India became a close ally of the USSR.
India still remained neutral with a USSR tilt nothing else
@@byron-ih2ge neutrality kind of ended after the Indo-Soviet treaty of 1971. India's largest trading partner was the USSR. India's voting records at the UN and several other foreign policy decisions reflected a de-facto alliance. Most of the Indians born in the 50s, 60s and 70s still have some remnants of the anti-American sentiment.
@@rjrastapopoulos1595 India became a close ally of Soviet Union as a result of the American support for Pakistan and reapproachment with China in 1971
@@rjrastapopoulos1595cause and effect USA pumped billions of dollars in Pakistan after 47', armed Pakistan to teeth and shunned india when india wanted weapons from USA.
Few days ago Serbia (as succesor of Yugoslavia) and one of finder of this movement organised big conference for anniversary of first conference of this movement
2:25 Context (aftermath of WW2)
6:21 Fiscal & diplomatic motives
8:36
Asian Relation Conference (1946 & 1949)
Colombo Powers Conference (1954)
11:10 *Bangdung Conference(1955)*
*10 principles of Bandung*
14:04 Formal declaration of NAM in the First Summit Conference in Belgrade (1961)
16:49 US & USSR reactions
Loved this video. I'm currently doing a term paper on the Bandung and Belgrade Conferences, unfortunately they don't get much attention in western historiography
Soekarno joined the non aligned movement but still have left tendency. indonesian received sverdlovs class cruised that renamed as KRI Irian, various soviet jets like MiG 17 and MiG 21. Some submarine that two of them still active till today. A submarine tender ship. Those weapon are used in the west papua confronfation
The problem is U.S Americans were always involved in the coup in order not to fall into Soviet but Nah the last coup Permesta was failed because the general detected Paratrooper, as result, he decided to go left little bit (Except relation with John F. Kennedy) until September '30s make him down and another awful regime was started in general who become chaos later in new order.
"Some submarine that two of them still active till today"
incorrect. You probably tought about the whiskey class sub which soekarno got from the Soviets, but those subs has been long retired and there's even one has been converted into a museum in surabaya.
The one that still active is Type 209 that Soeharto bought from East germany in 1977. And now only 1 subs left after the tragic loss of KRI Naggala
@@FuyatoB perhaps he even believed that theory of some whiskey submarines were in Brunei 😄
Even Indians did the same thy keep relation with USSR, bought Weapons and technology like Space tech and Aircraft carrier.
"some submarine that two of them still active today" mulut siapa itu asbun sekali!
NAM was a great concept, but too pure for this world. Even in India the older school textbooks praise the ambition, not its achievements. And nowadays India's being pushed ever closer to Uncle Sam thanks to foreign investment and CCP belligerence
Well China is just hitting the axe intended for US India relation into it's own leg. By thinking it is 1962 and India can't do shit. except It gave some to China in Galwan clashes with 45+ PLA soldiers dead. their little emperor ambitions of conquest to other's land and for world conquest will be their demise.
Did anybody notice that most of the people that were a part of this group were total Chads?
i remember literally learning about this over and over agai throughout my school years since i live in indonesia
Well the NAM was created not to content the other two blocs, but rather, it's because 'we don't give a dam about your conflict', sure itvs a rather 'loose' one.. But if the purpose was to uniting all members and stand against the other 2, then might as well called '3rd bloc or central bloc or something bloc'
And to be honest NAM was created because most of the founder and members are 'tired/sick' being under someone's feet. And being in NAM give you an advantage in trading in anything to both sides, sure the deals isn't much compared to if you join 1 side, but at least you won't have to offend one side and be dependant to the other.
Darth Stalin: “If you’re not with me, then you’re my enemy.”
well Nixon threatened to nuke Calcutta so India had to side with USSR to protect itself
Lol only americans believe that. In fact the only superpower who got angry over this NBM was the USA. they started funding rebellions in NBM countries, particulary in Indonesia.
@@harukrentz435 You know China and Yugoslavia were shunned from the Communist Bloc for not taking direction from Moscow?
Not taking directions from Stalin is literally the reason why Yugoslavia was a founding member of the Non-Alignment Movement.
Darth Sam: If you are not with me, you are a dirty communist.
@C D：Yes, during the cold war, the Soviet Union beat up many socialist countries, which led to a state of terror in Somalia and Afghanistan. Americans at least don't beat their dogs.( ‘-ωก̀ )
Guys, you've missed a quite important point: almost oll of NAM countries behaved like pretty girls who invited advances from many suitors for as long as they could keep them coming. Such countries milked both cows with great success, ready to sign countless submissive agreements with each side provided the other side does not learn about it. That politics almost always ended in disaster (as in Afganistan), eventually, but at the moment its allure was overwhelming.
I have to say a word for Afghanistan. Before 1973, Afghanistan received only about $1.2 billion in aid. (source: Taliban) however, Vietnam received more than $10 billion in aid from the Soviet Union. India and Yugoslavia have received a lot of assistance because of their geographical advantages, but in fact, the benefits of non aligned countries are no more than those of other countries
@@可爱包-c4v You could not be more wrong about Aganistan. Not only it was receiving astronomical help from IMF/etc, USSR was building a lot of houses (still the best housing in Kabul), schools, hospitalies, colleges, sending professors, trades, providing all kinds of education in USSR, etc. Vietnam, destroyed by war, was in a completely different situation.
@M Zrull:Afghanistan changed in 1973，1978 and 1979. After 1973, Afghanistan was ruled by Pro Soviet people. So , I can only refer to Afghanistan's assistance before 1973. According to 《Soviet aid to the third world.an analysis of its strategy》, Afghanistan received US $541 million, in 1955-1964 and 128.3 million in 1965-1979, but 742 million in 1979 and 426 million in 1975. There was not too much Soviet aid before 1973. In addition, the Soviet Union also provided $10 billion in aid to Mongolia and North Korea. Later, Russia cancelled their debts. So I don't think Afghanistan has received more funds because of the non aligned movement.
The above data are all Soviet aid received by Afghanistan.Excluding other countries
@@可爱包-c4v none of that has any correlation to reality.
Ah yes, the "play both factions to enrich my self and friends" faction. (Yes not all of the member is like this but most are).
Your saying it like it's a bad thing.
Fun fact, North Korean beloved flower the Kimilsungia was first introduced by president Sukarno to president Kim Il-Sung in the middle of the Bandung conference in which they both part of
The "Ten Principles" seems like a very fair and positive proposal.
if only they were applied
@@Game_Hero Exactly :-(
@@Game_Hero well nothing can be done overnight.ALos poeple forget that even if THSOE WERE APPLIED later down the line there would be some coup or some external factor that wouldve caused problems and stir the pot bcs at the time it would benefit oustide powers.Togoslavia was PURPOSLY DESOLVED it wasnt just a oh civil war out of nowhere.MANY OUTSIDE POWERS ESPECIALY GERMANY wanted to so to say stick it back/payback to Yugoslavia precicely Serbia for WW1/WW2.Then it used the commotions to stir the pot.Geramny used its puppet wich stayed loyal even after WW1/2 to do ist bidding and via Croatia to extend its geopolitical/influence presence in the Balkans.Then we had Italy who was also eager to regain not only its geopolitical/influential foothold throu Albania but also thru Croatia bcs it wated those costal territories and a civil war/breakup would give them a chace to do so nad maybe even if Germany alowed get some of those costals.Then we had Brits who wanted yet again to re-establish its own geopolitical/influenc efoothold in the Balkas (it owudl be hard but duoable).Then we have Turkey wich also so to say had a vendeta same as Germany,Austria,Hungary but it didnt so to say directly atrget otehr federation but soly focused on Bosnian federation thru it wanted its piece of the pie.Then finaly we gand USA who at beggining didnt so to say payt much o attention (it did sell arms and probably intel) but it wasnt heavly involved into geopolitical game in Yugoslavia BUT after it saw that tehre is actual great possibility to gaing a solid foothold i Balkans/Yugoslavia nad alos basicaly destroy the economical rival to Europe/NATO wich was Allie to USA then they started with their HEAVY involment mostly in Bosnian federation and Serbian autonomous province of Kosovo. So even if countrie sstarted TO DO WORD FOR WORD form that list TEHRE WILL ALWAYS BE AN OUSTIDE POWER THAT WOUDL DISRUPT THAT OR FORCE THE COUNTRY TO NOT FOLLOW THE LIST/DONT PLAY BY TEH BOOK SIMPLY BCS IT CANT.
Have been waiting for this since my country ini it and one of the pioneer , just curious will it be different from the history books we got back then in school
India's 🇮🇳 major allies today r: 🇫🇷 🇷🇺 🇺🇸 🇯🇵
As u can see we have still maintained our neutrality although ya nowadays we have a western tilt cus 🇨🇳
Nehru was most stupid PM of India, becouse of him india lost 1962 and UN permanent seat.
it was in Third World block that Cold War was fiercely fought (civil wars, coup d'etat, rebel groups).
Yes, I agree. Many of the conflicts were proxy wars on behalf of the two blocks.
Great timing! My tea is just about ready.
Nice video
This is amazing and no detail left un done!
Funny how you mentioned Warsaw pact first before NATO.
I've heard a little about the NAM before, but not in a little while. Thank you for another informative episode, particularly in laying out those ten points in full. I would enjoy more episodes on the NAM to learn even more about it.
God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)
11:50 Yo, that is Nehru's speech "at the stroke of the mid night hour", Aug 15, 1947. It is not Colombo Conference.
Love your channel, fantastic videos
Recently, I studied the history of Afghanistan. Afghanistan likes the United States, but Afghanistan has a territorial dispute with Pakistan, an American ally. The United States does not provide military assistance to Afghanistan, so Afghanistan asks the Soviet Union for military assistance (Afghan officers study in the Soviet Union), but Afghanistan continues to ask the United States for economic assistance and joins the non aligned movement. This is a smart idea. At the political meeting of the Soviet Union, the Soviet leaders almost cancelled the invasion plan of Afghanistan for fear of the opposition of non aligned countries. The non aligned movement almost changed the fate of Afghanistan.😥😥😥😭😭😭
People who life in Bandung belike
AYYYYY HELLO MY BOIS IM BACK
I love seeing “free market” commercials at the beginning of these “Cold War” videos….
That shows you what ideals work…. 😂
5 years of italian occupation does not constitute colonialism, but 500 years of ottoman and austrian rule over balkans does.
Alternative Title
The Bullied Kids Group
Amazing!! Thank you
I appreciate the wisdom of these leaders, especially our PM Nehru. We wanted a world peace and Co operation.
The Non-Aligned Movement furthered and championed the will and dignity of the entirety of the Third World, and Yugoslavia, as one of its three founding members, was its most powerful, and longest-standing leader. Yugoslavia's founding and leadership of the Non-Aligned Movement repositioned her to the position of the third global power during the Cold War.
In the 1980s Deng Xiaoping's foreign policy resembled Yugoslavia's stance of being non-aligned and non-confrontational and with Hu Yaobang’s 1983 appraisal of ‘Josip Tito's principles of independence and equality among all communist parties, and of opposing imperialism, colonialism, and hegemonism’.[3]"
"Muammar Gaddafi's Third International Theory, outlined in his Green Book which informed Libyan national policy from its formation in 1975 until Gaddafi's downfall in 2011, was heavily inspired by and shared many similarities with Titoism and Yugoslav workers' self-management.[49][50]"
"Nine years later, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the chief advisor to President Jimmy Carter, said that Yugoslavia, together with the United States and the Soviet Union, was the only country that had affirmed itself as a global factor. Belgrade's position in the Non-Aligned Movement was constructive. In the light of the dying détente, parallel to an increase in the number of conflicts in the Third World, the behavior of Cuba and Vietnam, Yugoslavia really seemed like an “American communist ally”.
Always want you to cover this topics.. thanks bro 🙏
Please make history of Indonesian Communism era and Confrontation 1963
always excited to see a upload, you guys cover good shit about the cold war, like actual life in it for everyone.
Our president Soekarno chose to maintain diplomatic relation with communist state like USSR, North Korea, Cuba, etc despite Indonesia was one of non Allignment Movement. He also gave more power and strategic political position to Indonesian Communist party (PKI) and rise the negative tension between him and military and Islamist. That was one of many causes why he lost all of his power and influence over Indonesian in 1967 and thus the New Order was born under dictatorship of Presiden Soeharto.
he wanted to control every political groups that distrusted each other.
Soekarno ruled with an iron fist almost like tito to maintain the indonesian state.
Also he wanted to work with the japanese in WW2.
Weird to see that a lot of these non-aligned nations were 'evil'.
Not sure to be evil because even he cooperate with Japan because propaganda if Japan is old Brothers Indonesia, always has been if you do not see why he corporate, also Soekarno actually can tolerate but nah since U.S.A get involved at the coup in Permesta also others so he has done with the U.S.A and turns a little bit to left but since the generals also have a conflict because many not loyal to him so many they have suspect about '30s coup in September and as result, he gets down and changes another dictator and tyrants
and remember one point why he corporate Japan because he still has trust with them about promise independence, even no longer after nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the young faction decides to kidnap him and ask to declare independence immediately and Soekarno refused and say if you want to kill me just kill me but they are too scared to fo that because he is a pioneer for the independence. And the negotiation between Ahmad Soebarjo and the kidnap change and make sure they declared as soon as possible on the date is promised 17th August 1945.
We love watching you every Saturday morning 🥰
Your bell button jokes always makes me chuckle. Thanks for that. 🙂
As a citizen of Bandung city. I'm very proud that my hometown was become part of the history. Also, I hope from now through the future, Indonesia still firm on its non-aligment movement. Eventhough, there's still growing concern over China-US conflict in the South East Asia region. Peace for Us ✌✌✌
The conflict between China and the United States has become a peaceful high price coal competition in Indonesia, not a hot war, as them want
NAM sentiment is current very strong in current Indonesian and Malaysian international policy nowadays. and our people equally distrust The US /West and China
NAM means We are aligned with both side
At the end of the day the NAM really compromised MOSTLY* socialist countries not wanting to be under the USSR. However, as socialist countries their developed was quite poor, and many were brutal dictatorships.
The building that hosted the conference"Gedung Merdeka", is the place where i lost my virginity.
Egypt was the leading figure in the movement!
We’re they really non-aligned ? I don’t think so. Realistically they had to economically and socially be connected to one of the two great ideas. How can you really be independent in this world
You can be independent if you're willing to put up with being isolated, backward and inconsequential.
Somehow forgetting that Yugoslavia IE the were under ottoman rule for up to 500 years and saying that they never were colonies is just uninformed and disapointing
I am so proud to be born and lived in exYugoslavia. A beautifull land.
This conference make uncle sam mad and backed one major general to overthrow the president and that my friend cost us a million live in Indonesia, thank you uncle sam for bringing democration and for rob a mountain of a gold and still rob us
Well either that, or indonesia literally Will be Mao Bastion. Pick and choose really. Communist literally run rampant with Soekarno era, and imagine when Soekarno pass away or no longer be president, it's a very very high chance Indonesian becomes a China vassal state now. And that's will definitely be Vietnam 2.0 electric bogaloo. As wtf as it be, Soeharto is somehow the best case scenario in Indonesia at that time. The other being open occupancy by US
O look Soekarno I'm Indonesian in the thumbnail there's Soekarno i like it
Nation leaders who decided to go non aligned woke up and choose peace
NAM members : yeah we just here to spectate you guys
The good side.
Im a simple Indonesian, I see Soekarno at thumbnail, i click
can we change the soundtrack just a bit the three or four tracks are getting very monotinous
You said Yugoslavia had no history of colonialism but the Ottoman Empire and Austro-Hungaria begs to differ
Gerakan Non-blok.
honestly i wish the uk would leave nato and join the N.A.M
Wait, am I seeing a Vault Boy (from Fallout) in the bottom left of the screen?? :D
As we know is Non-Block Movement
"yugoslavia had no history of colonialism" so we're just ignoring the ottoman empire? i mean yugoslavia as a newly unified state didn't have such history, but omitting centuries of subjugation is kind of misleading
Most of the constituent nations making up Yugoslavia has been free from the Ottoman Empire for well over 70 years, only an extremely few people at the time were alive to remember those...
Not to mention Austrian Empire
@@axelpatrickb.pingol3228 you forget Nazi Germany and fascist Italy which subjugated it during the war
Can you talk about the GANEFO games
Now the only country from the original NAM initiators that remain as true Non Bloc nation is Indonesia. Others are either now leaning to West (USA/Europe) or China.
Imagine Indonesian Bloc hah! 😄
India try to improve relationship with china but they want our land .they don't give us any option
The constituent countries of Yugoslavia absolutely had a history of colonialism, are you familiar with the Ottoman Empire?
soekarno is so cool
Vidio ini berfaidah gua dari Indonesia
why are these not taught in schools
Meanwhile, it's quite a big deal in history classes in Indonesian schools.
@@TwentyNinerRAs an indian I agree😆😆
Our 1 yr worth of history lessons r on NAM
Soekarno, one of the best sons of Nusantara
Greetings from bandung!!
Greetings from Malaysia.
Aaa no look the egyptian abdle nawser 😨
Indonesia once a pride country.
Literally NAM
Yugoslavia had a history of colonialism. Under the Hapsburgs and the Ottomans.
THanks
I was teached the name was Non-Block Movement cuz there's no good translation of "alignment" to indonesian lol
Thanks for reading my request at email! 👍
Major of members of nam is now us allies india Indonesia etc
Indonesia still trying it best to make deal with either us or china block. While india have complicated relationship with china
INDIA IS NOT A US ALLY.
@@muhamadrizal4 India still maintains neutrality between America and Russia