How PT-6 Turbines Are Overhauled

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 авг 2015
  • Pratt & Whitney's venerable PT-6 turbine is one of the marvels of aviation. But like everything else in aviation, it requires overhaul. In this engaging video, AVweb's Paul Bertorelli gives us a tour of Continental Motors' United Turbine division, which specializes in the PT-6.
  • Авто/МотоАвто/Мото

Комментарии • 126

  • @xav8tr974
    @xav8tr974 2 года назад +8

    Nice to see these guys working patiently with their hands and taking pride in their work.

  • @jrdeckard3317
    @jrdeckard3317 4 года назад +72

    The final step is open-wallet surgery, performed while the customer is hanging upside down.

    • @darreno1450
      @darreno1450 3 года назад

      lol!

    • @awaitingthetrumpetcall4529
      @awaitingthetrumpetcall4529 3 года назад +3

      I love the imagery...but...if something goes wrong in the air you can't pull over to the side of the road. Repair is still cheaper than replacement.

  • @Native_love
    @Native_love Год назад +2

    The most trusted and reliable turboprop in the world! Awesome!

  • @Windtee
    @Windtee 8 лет назад +6

    Cool tour and workflow explanation!

  • @RossLeavitt
    @RossLeavitt 3 года назад +6

    I always wondered where the $500k goes. That makes sense now!

  • @absalommikkelsen
    @absalommikkelsen 7 лет назад +2

    Great video. Very informative

  • @ljohnbaptiste
    @ljohnbaptiste 8 лет назад +93

    the black dude is my dad in this vid

    • @9HighFlyer9
      @9HighFlyer9 7 лет назад +35

      Larry Sr. Just in this video or all the time? 😉

    • @basimpsn
      @basimpsn 7 лет назад +1

      What??

    • @PRM256
      @PRM256 4 года назад +2

      Reformulating the statement. The black guy in this vid is your dad.

    • @christophermichaelson9050
      @christophermichaelson9050 3 года назад +2

      That's really neat. It looks like he takes his work seriously.

    • @BrilliantDesignOnline
      @BrilliantDesignOnline 3 года назад +1

      Looks like a super professional shop to work for; cool.

  • @tonnymampouya2583
    @tonnymampouya2583 Год назад

    am so glad how you explain all this to now the fonctional of PT6 engine

  • @chapmasi
    @chapmasi 2 года назад +9

    I read that standard 3500hr overhaul for the PT6 costs approx $250K....... I can see why

    • @ghostrider-be9ek
      @ghostrider-be9ek 4 месяца назад +1

      most owners already already putting money aside every hour, either by budgets or actual cashflow

    • @RainbowManification
      @RainbowManification 2 месяца назад

      Closer to 4 to 600k. And if you’re on a scheduled maintenance program you can extend that overhaul time up to 5000 hours

  • @Checkered_Demon00
    @Checkered_Demon00 Год назад

    Super cool, I wanna work for an MRO doing overhaul….maybe even eventually NDT…gotta graduate AMT school first though…

  • @mojogrip
    @mojogrip 7 лет назад +2

    Very neat"

  • @johnrichards3773
    @johnrichards3773 8 лет назад +1

    Nice job on the tour. Are they busy?

  • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
    @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

    The "uHhHhHh aCtUaLLy..." spergs are out in force on this one.

  • @ubertown100
    @ubertown100 7 лет назад +1

    Hell yeah good topic

  • @maheralazzawi7814
    @maheralazzawi7814 2 года назад

    best engine and good job

  • @tractorliewtractorliew7905
    @tractorliewtractorliew7905 7 лет назад +1

    good engineering thank

  • @TheBillo733
    @TheBillo733 3 года назад

    Nice

  • @FINSuojeluskunta
    @FINSuojeluskunta 5 лет назад +5

    Most turboshafts have free turbines too. Allows you to start the engine without the load of the rotor or in this case the prop

  • @motoputz3201
    @motoputz3201 3 года назад

    what a process

  • @jlgarau
    @jlgarau 6 лет назад

    Great...

  • @allancopland1768
    @allancopland1768 3 года назад +6

    "Everything is spinning in the same direction'.... I suggest you take a much closer look at a PT6!
    .

    • @davidcounts3781
      @davidcounts3781 10 месяцев назад

      I think he was comparing it to a piston engine where things move in opposite directions.

    • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
      @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

      Spinning in the same direction, as in not changing directions like in a reciprocating engine. Spergburger.

  • @arnenelson4495
    @arnenelson4495 11 месяцев назад +1

    I'm surprised they use calipers instead of more precise micrometers.

  • @thammanoonkamfunt5470
    @thammanoonkamfunt5470 5 лет назад

    Good Job !!!

  • @andreandrezao3727
    @andreandrezao3727 4 года назад

    Good morning friends, my name is André de Paula, today I am a mechanic / inspector at the "AIR SPEED" company in Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, and I would like to ask a question with my dear friends, who have experience with the turbo-engine line. axis of the PT6 family. My question is: our company is starting to launch a review of these engines here in Brazil, and we are going to receive a PT6-27 to be converted to PT6-34, do you happen to have any biography or SB for this conversion?

  • @Naija4K
    @Naija4K 2 года назад

    On average how much does a well maintained PT6A-60A cost to overhaul ans how long does it typically take?

    • @FutureSystem738
      @FutureSystem738 Год назад

      If you have to ask, you can’t afford it 😢

  • @JamesJesseGTA
    @JamesJesseGTA 7 лет назад

    I wonder if job applications are currently being accepted. Only have classroom experience on the PT6 but I have my A&P rating.

  • @sugershakify
    @sugershakify 8 лет назад +44

    Was hoping to finally see the machine that liquefies cash and injects into the parts :(

    • @charliefoxtrotthe3rd335
      @charliefoxtrotthe3rd335 8 лет назад +6

      +sugershakify You did see the cash liquifier. It was that entire building! It takes cash and converts it over to parts and labor and profit at an astounding rate!

    • @russella7263
      @russella7263 2 года назад

      It’s smaller and harder to see at P&W overhauls. The ones used on Safran overhauls are much larger.

    • @Mike4444x
      @Mike4444x Год назад +1

      Are you saying there’s a HUGE markup with turbine overhauls? Similar to an oil change for a Mercedes Benz vs Toyota? 😜

  • @JMGlider
    @JMGlider 23 дня назад

    In your explanation you say the free turbine setup makes it different to a turboshaft, this is incorrect. A PT6B is a helicopter version, which is still a free turbine but also a turboshaft because of the mayor gearbox it is attached to.
    It is mainly wording, I know, and a bit confusing. Because all turboprops have gearboxes between them and the prop, so I don't know from which point it changes to a turboshaft by definition.

  • @divisioneight
    @divisioneight 8 лет назад +3

    Are PT6's still made new from the factory or are they all rebuilt?

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 6 лет назад +1

      They make new PT6 engines. There are new planes being build that use PT6 engines. They install new engines, not re-manufactured engines. There are several versions of the PT-6.

    • @billyhess5263
      @billyhess5263 4 года назад +1

      We (eaton aerospace/ Argo tech) make OEM fuel pumps all the time. Haven't made many spares, all for new OEM engines.

  • @sacempy
    @sacempy 2 года назад

    Hola United Turbine,,, una vez estuve por ahí,,,, por si acaso tienen en Spanish,,, gracias

  • @a-fl-man640
    @a-fl-man640 5 месяцев назад

    big $. nice engine.

  • @kazimaydin2017
    @kazimaydin2017 6 лет назад

    Hello
    first of all, I'm sorry my English is very bad.
    I have a PT6A-6.
    This engine; turbine blade, Thermocouple Probe, stator vanes's burned.
    How can I get these parts?

    • @shodanxx
      @shodanxx 6 лет назад

      Hello, if your vanes are burned beyond OHM limits you will need a new set of CT blades as well. Pratt & Whitney Canada Plant 5 in Saint-Hubert, QC, Canada can overhaul your engine but the PT6A-6 is a very old model and it might not be worth repairing.

    • @ZZZHarpy101
      @ZZZHarpy101 5 лет назад +1

      When he mentions stator, I guess he means PT stators not the CT ones. CT stators have their vanes eroded and FODed, not burned.Having an old model never been an issue as long as the engine have his Certificate of Airworthiness. He should probably look for an Authorized Service Center near him instead of having it shipped at St-Hubert. He mention having issue with his English language. He's probably not a north American operator. As for the old spare parts, as long as P&WC knows that one of their customer need one, I can assure they will provide it. Its a matter of pride and reputation to stand by the "Reliable Engine" logo. A couple of years ago, they even rebuilt two WASP for a replica of Amelia Earhart's airplane.

  • @junaxcabz1811
    @junaxcabz1811 5 лет назад +1

    How to apply SiR. I'm aircraft maintenance here in the Philippines

    • @CurlousCam
      @CurlousCam 4 года назад

      My A&P teacher is from the Phillipines here in the U.S.A.

  • @Milosz_Ostrow
    @Milosz_Ostrow 8 лет назад +4

    The turbine overhaul process is considerably longer and more involved than overhaul of a typical automotive reciprocating engine.

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 6 лет назад +1

      Even the overhaul process of a piston airplane engine is longer than an automotive engine overhaul.

    • @AMM1998
      @AMM1998 6 лет назад +3

      Yes that goes without saying. You can overhaul a recip engine(automotive) in a day or two. It is a very different world when you start looking into how much documentation and tolerances impact the job time in aviation.

    • @davem5333
      @davem5333 3 года назад +3

      What makes the overhaul process and costs so much more for an aircraft engine over a car engine is the number of intensive and detailed inspection procedures, equipment and requirements.
      A car engine failure is generally a fairly minor inconvenience. An aircraft engine failure is often a fatal problem.

  • @TheWalterHWhite
    @TheWalterHWhite 4 месяца назад

    The engineering is actually pretty easily explained. Longevity is equal to x times a thousand dollars. Where x is the hours flown. Simply put, the PT6 runs on crisp clean hundred dollar bills.

  • @lowfung3621
    @lowfung3621 5 лет назад +1

    I wonder what the power losses are when you force the incoming air to make four 90 degree turns before it is mixed with the fuel. The exhaust of course also generates negative energy through negative thrust and drag as it is expelled out of the front of the engine. Building a pusher prop version of the PT6 would probably be more powerful since the air could be fed directly into the compressor section.

    • @ZZZHarpy101
      @ZZZHarpy101 5 лет назад

      Look at the Piaggio Avanti. :)

    • @LeonelEBD
      @LeonelEBD 4 года назад

      Afik is because it helps keeping the gearbox mechanism small and makes for an easier installation o small aircraft.

    • @eugeneoreilly9356
      @eugeneoreilly9356 3 года назад +2

      There will always be parasitic losses whether the airflow changes direction or not.Every engine that uses centrifugal compressors must initiate at least two 90 degree airflow turns.This is how a centrifugal compressor works,it trades air velocity for pressure.This is known as the Venturi effect and applies equally to liquids and gases.

  • @loganadams6881
    @loganadams6881 5 лет назад

    He said at the BEGINNING that everything spins one way...did not look like that. While it was rotating??$$$$$$$$$: )

  • @rumingjiang69
    @rumingjiang69 8 месяцев назад

    How's the turbine balanced on the machine at 4:15?

    • @mateospennati350
      @mateospennati350 Месяц назад +1

      That machine is used for assembly after its alredy been balanced

  • @shodanxx
    @shodanxx 6 лет назад +1

    Why is that shop so dark !

  • @clarkpitts5393
    @clarkpitts5393 2 года назад +1

    The G.G (Gas Generator) section turns opposite to the P.T. (Power Turbine) Section.

    • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
      @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

      He meant it doesn't change direction like in a reciprocating engine, sperg.

    • @clarkpitts5393
      @clarkpitts5393 9 месяцев назад

      I work on them, I know, what they do. I didn't say he was wrong. You're just another person trying to start shit on the internet.@@eat_a_dick_trudeau

  • @MeaHeaR
    @MeaHeaR Год назад

    OMG é Power-Phull

  • @scottjustscott3730
    @scottjustscott3730 6 лет назад +3

    What does NDT stand for? It was called NDI in my day, sonny!👴✈

    • @HerkCC
      @HerkCC 6 лет назад +2

      Scott D Nondestructive Test. ...FPI and MPI.....some parts are x-ray and eddy current methods

  • @rogerfroud300
    @rogerfroud300 4 года назад

    It would be interesting to get some idea of the cost involved. There must be an absolute minimum and typical cost they could supply.

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 4 года назад

      Not all engines wear the same though, once you start replacing the spinning parts, it probably gets quite expensive quickly.. Like thousands per blade. and tens of thousands for discs...

    • @RossLeavitt
      @RossLeavitt 3 года назад

      It’s generally about $500,000.

    • @Native_love
      @Native_love Год назад +1

      There's no price for reliability.

  • @sherwinsalvatori6997
    @sherwinsalvatori6997 4 года назад

    Am guessing your inventory is on mark

  • @jrdeckard3317
    @jrdeckard3317 4 года назад

    No test run?

  • @vinceocratic
    @vinceocratic 2 года назад +1

    Everything IS not spinning in the same direction. On a PT-6 the compressor turbines and power turbines spin in completely different directions.

    • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
      @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

      Whoa simmer down Super Sperg. He meant they aren't changing directions like in a reciprocating engine.

  • @andymunnings9109
    @andymunnings9109 Год назад

    👍

  • @ben3989
    @ben3989 7 лет назад +2

    so what does it cost to rebuild an average pt-6?

    • @MasterChief-sl9ro
      @MasterChief-sl9ro 7 лет назад +2

      $200,000.00 to $300,000.00.. They cap the cost at $300,000.00 for a normal functional power plant.

    • @ZZZHarpy101
      @ZZZHarpy101 5 лет назад

      The TBO and HSI varies depending if it's a small PT6 or a large PT6, from 2000 hrs for PT6A-38 to 6000 hrs for some PT6A-65 and 67 versions. But P&WC offer a pay-by-hour maintenance plan that most operators use to keep their maintenance fee as low as possible. Now some parts are replaced or reworked before attaining the TBO mark, making less likely to spend a $300k in one shot. Plus, there is less occurrence of extra worn out damage that happen when many parts get old and affect the performance of other.

    • @the.digital.nomads
      @the.digital.nomads 5 лет назад

      so unlike his opener where he compares piston engines and turbine engines, turbine engines don't really have a longer TBO unless you go really big

  • @phaecops
    @phaecops 5 лет назад +5

    And all they charge is $250,000.

  • @sagemaster3408
    @sagemaster3408 4 месяца назад

    Everyone just wants to argue and be right and prove everyone wrong. We suck

  • @dr.mostafasokkar4821
    @dr.mostafasokkar4821 8 лет назад +1

    Overhauling

  • @JoseHernandez-eo3wu
    @JoseHernandez-eo3wu 4 года назад

    RIP united turbine

  • @abdullahsekai4279
    @abdullahsekai4279 3 года назад +6

    ''Everything is spinning in the same direction'' then you watch a video of how a pt6 operates and realise this is wrong

    • @TrimeshSZ
      @TrimeshSZ 2 года назад +5

      I think what he's trying to say is "Every part moves in a consistent direction, unlike a reciprocating engine"

    • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
      @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

      When you're such a hyper focused insufferable SPERG, trying to show everyone how smart you are, you can't figure out he meant in relation to the parts of a reciprocating engine, which CHANGE DIRECTIONS.
      Swing and a miss rainman.

  • @bryanspilner
    @bryanspilner 2 года назад

    why does he have puka shells on?

  • @elzorro31
    @elzorro31 2 года назад

    By the time everything is said and done you owe them $500k .

  • @ronjohnson9507
    @ronjohnson9507 4 года назад +2

    Need your pt6a overhauled? Call the bank.

  • @Chrismarquez7
    @Chrismarquez7 5 лет назад +2

    This technology is so old. I can’t wait till everything goes electric, simplified, efficient. No more ridiculous costs for overhauls. Aviation will finally be cheaper and more affordable.

    • @jamesscott5407
      @jamesscott5407 4 года назад +3

      Yeah...just got to wait until they discover an efficient fuel source to give good sustained flight times...lithium ain't going to cut it...fission is dangerous and still to heavy and bulky...guess we will have to wait until we become a type 1 civilization in a century or two when we crack fusion!! Hydrocarbons aren't going anywhere anytime soon!!

    • @9HighFlyer9
      @9HighFlyer9 3 года назад +2

      It won't matter that the powerplant is simple. It's aviation and it'll always be expensive. There's always going to be inspections and time limited components. If there is no secondary income stream from parts, inspections and overhauls it doesn't really give much incentive to develop/certify the powerplants. As it is now they can expect to get your overhaul business every few years.

    • @freetobe3
      @freetobe3 3 года назад +1

      Aircraft grade parts and maintenance are expensive because so much work has been put into them to function as long and as well and as safely as needed and beyond that for safe measure.
      Sure, fuel costs are big and so is the powerplant but electric powerplants and batteries would still need to be made way better than even the best on the road and would need to be maintained just as much, it's cheaper but not an insane amount.

    • @TheReadBaron91
      @TheReadBaron91 2 года назад

      They are still going to make you replace your battery every year, or every so often.
      At least for 20 years until they have a guarantee it will work.

    • @eat_a_dick_trudeau
      @eat_a_dick_trudeau 9 месяцев назад

      🙄 Yeah... because batteries last forever and never have to be replaced at exorbitant cost. Doofus.

  • @immortaljatt05
    @immortaljatt05 6 лет назад +8

    IDK why people pronounce Turbine "Tur-bin" people forget what the E does lol

    • @TRPGpilot
      @TRPGpilot 3 года назад +4

      Its that aberration called American 'English' I suppose. I remember the first time I heard 'eye-rack' (Iraq for actual English speakers) I almost spilt my cup of tea! . . .

  • @primusairborne63
    @primusairborne63 6 лет назад +3

    I love how he opens up with the completely false statement: "all parts are spinning in the same direction..." Absolutely wrong. The compressor turbine and Power turbine spin in completely opposite directions.

    • @kls8469
      @kls8469 6 лет назад +5

      Primus Airborne his statement is true if you don't understand it as " all moving parts goes the same way", but as "each part only goes one way". In a turbine engine, each part has one direction of motion, in opposition to a piston engine where parts are changing directions at least twice every rotation, hence avoiding accelerations on the parts or non uniform wear... It's kind of a semantic problem there, I think, although as I'm not English speaking born, maybe he should have said it some other way to be properly understood...

    • @shodanxx
      @shodanxx 6 лет назад

      Also implies at 1:50 that turboshaft engines are not free turbine, but the PT6B is a turboshaft engine and it is also a free power turbine design.

  • @deeremeyer1749
    @deeremeyer1749 6 лет назад +1

    Uh, many turbines have parts and assemblies that "counter-rotate" and they still have "pressure pulses" that are causing vibration and resonance of parts. They're just so much less efficient and "leaky" than piston engines and waste so much more heat energy and pressure that the vibration and resonance is "cushioned" by the vibrations flowing through the engine. The ridiculously loud exhaust is all wasted energy. Similarly powerful piston engines burn a fraction of the fuel and produce a fraction of the noise to make as much power. Piston engines that burn as much fuel and make as much noise produce far more power.

    • @ZZZHarpy101
      @ZZZHarpy101 5 лет назад +2

      PT6A-6 weight 270 lbs and develop 578 hp vs the R-1340 that weight 930 lbs for a power of 600 hp. If the piston engine burns less fuel per hour as you said, remember the part of that fuel is uselessly wasted to lift its own extra engine weight. ;)

    • @nikonblaze
      @nikonblaze 5 лет назад +3

      But did you see a piston engine on Airbus or rafale ?

  • @aftereffectstutorials9664
    @aftereffectstutorials9664 4 года назад

    Please India stop terrorism in Kashmir and other countries and try to love humanity..
    Nice video Brother keep it up. I want to do job here I am interested To join you..

  • @LBG-cf8gu
    @LBG-cf8gu 2 года назад

    Anoother example of why all those leased a/c in russia will never fly outside again.

  • @blackblueandgreenmusick1897
    @blackblueandgreenmusick1897 5 лет назад

    vt

  • @LuizCma
    @LuizCma 7 лет назад

    brasil ok.

  • @abecoulter18
    @abecoulter18 5 лет назад

    Turbin is a Indian hat. It's. Turbine. Bine. Not bin

  • @eminye1
    @eminye1 8 лет назад

    "turban as apposed to to turbine"

    • @eugeneoreilly9356
      @eugeneoreilly9356 3 года назад

      Yes,one generates rotational motion while the other is worn on the head.