@@Buddyclub33 Yes! i dont think i have ever been on a 767 that the landing was actually smooth, they all seem like they smash em down, i dont know if its the way the gear is positioned or what.
@@Roboseal2it is because these 400's were obtained in the merger with Continental. They were not originally ordered by the old United. United probably buys p&w, otherwise
I now know the real answer. Pratt never opted to engineer a higher thrust engine for the 767-400 which was a smart move because the 767-400 did not sell well.@@jeremyhilton3005
I'm afraid I have to deduct marks for you missing the beginning of the start-up sequence, of the CF6 engine on your side. You came to realise it was starting up, due to the sound of it burning fuel. Other than that, awesome video.
Lovely united airlines flight Seb Aviation
Love all those power adjustments on landing!
@@Buddyclub33 Yes! i dont think i have ever been on a 767 that the landing was actually smooth, they all seem like they smash em down, i dont know if its the way the gear is positioned or what.
Yeah I know, right?!?! That's why I love flying...just incredible!
@@Buddyclub33 haha...i know.
What incredible views of Houston, TX! I had no idea how spread out the city was from the air. Wow!!!
Lovely trip report.
Love the condensation on the wing and engine
Cf6 is up there with the best sounding engines in my opinion. Especially the startup during takeoff
They all sound good IMO CF6-80C, GE90, Trent 800 and 1000 are my top 4
i don't know why i think 767's engine sounds when taking off sounds like screaming
They mainly use pw4000s for their 767s
only for the -300 series.
Classic take off views out of Dulles on UA 767
CF6 on a United 767? Rare
Only engine offered on the -400
its a 400 thats why
but why? The PW4000 makes just as much thrust... @fly-navy @@frtguy80
@@Roboseal2it is because these 400's were obtained in the merger with Continental. They were not originally ordered by the old United. United probably buys p&w, otherwise
I now know the real answer. Pratt never opted to engineer a higher thrust engine for the 767-400 which was a smart move because the 767-400 did not sell well.@@jeremyhilton3005
That engine cowling has seen much better days…
I run these on the ground for power generation (LM6000)
Imagine being a pro wrestler in the 1980s and having to fly almost every day to perform... Jesus... This was a normal day at the office.
I'm afraid I have to deduct marks for you missing the beginning of the start-up sequence, of the CF6 engine on your side. You came to realise it was starting up, due to the sound of it burning fuel. Other than that, awesome video.