AGM 183A Arrow U.S Long-range Hypersonic Missile
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 фев 2021
- agm-183a arrow advanced rapid response weapon . The AGM-183A ARRW Arrows is a long-range hypersonic missile designed by Lockheed Martin for the US Air Force (USAF).
The missile will improve the hypersonic strike capabilities of the USAF. It will provide rapid response by striking high-value, time-dependent targets in challenging locations, including enemy military bases and surface warships from stand-off distances.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ themilitary24
defense-tv.com/
#agm183a 
Наука
Back in the 50's the Russians filmed fleets of their bombers in the sky and released the videos/tapes. This jolted us so badly that we proceeded to build our own fleets of B-52s. Now we know that the Russians never had all those bombers, they just kept the same groups flying around a circle in the sky.
We will build our own hyper-sonic weapons, they will far surpass anything anyone else has. We need to be careful not to go overboard and build 100,000 of them, however.
We can build them, but we can't stop them. That is why Russia made them not to say "You can't do this".
@@davidste60 the U.S. Navy has already shot down a Chinese hypersonic missile. with it's new laser missile defense weapon
@@boostjunkie2320 Who told you that?
@@davidste60 he is a junkie 🤣
@@boostjunkie2320 false. the laser weapon isnt even in service yet. china has never fired its hypersonic missile to usa yet
Ah yes. This missile knows where it is because it knows where it isnt. I got it.
haha that tomahawk video is the best
But it also isn't where it wasn't
Its true though, a cruise missile is always going in the wrong direction
Hypersonic missiles have been tested in the US arsenal starting in the late 1970’s and practical use began at White Sands in the early 1980’s.
Just because we hear that they have it doesn't mean we do not. Remember that every time a weapon is developed someone else makes a counter to it. We may have stuff that is so new that no news is not some one else's information.
Greg Wallace I just told you we have it. I lived in the town where they are tested.
Yeah I think the U.S. Has had hypersonic missiles before but wanted to research and invest more into railgun technology
@@gregwallace9314 that's easy to say and it makes you look smart but when it comes to hypersonics USA id playing catch up
@@tibchy144 Don't think so we had those pyramid shaped nuclear defense structures that deployed mini nuked i believe to counter ICBMs in the earlier 70s that were hypersonic
The US had a long range missile that descended onto its target. The Phoenix missile descended at Mach 4 after accelerating to high altitude. The upon descent it was not losing speed and could easily take out target planes.
which target planes? Biplanes ? F35 ?
The Phoenix? What weapon are you referring to?
Losing.
Missile
My comment got killed by iPhone auto spell. Bad.
Eye Opening Video. Thank you.
With such a weapon, the survivors will be living in tents around the metropolitan cities. Oh crap, that is already happening.
😂😂😂😂👍🏻
Well played.👍
Wdym
Ukraine!!!!
@@randybaumery5090 NYC
Can't wait for final version to fielded
The kill vehicle is shaped like a stealth bomber, I bet it has stealth coating too.
Fascinating
I bet you are right!
No need for stealth coating. This thing glows in the sky like a shooting star. Because of the plasma surrounding it. Any infared camera can see it. But still there's no counter for this type of weapon
Top
That’s a super duper missile if I’ve ever seen one
“Trump’s Super-Duper Missile”. I’m LMAO. That name.
bidens now, although i think this is a joint venture between Australia and America anyway.
@@jasoar1563 yep, and has been in development since before 2016.....
it's from an interview when Trump called it super duper missile because it is 17 times faster than russia's and china's, which he brags and credited himself. lol
Trump 🤮 He dont created this weapon.. US Militär super duper weapon
That orange turd had nothing to do with that weapon
It's going to be wonderful, the likes of which nobody has ever seen before.
congratulations, failed for the second time🤭
@@akltom Is It failed?
@@fqeagles21 second time failure😅
@@akltom Roger,but maybe they are developing a newer version
@@akltom 又一次失败了
Getting in to Rods of God
The us reached mach 9.6 in 1999, the X43
9.6 not 20
@@svenhaheim my bad
Wrong, it was in the end of 2004. Need a long stable flight, control of the weapon during flight, some issues that haven't been solved yet by States.
Anything "Super Duper" must be great... only a "Super Deluxe" might be better
I love B52's ...
Oh, what if they have Super Duper missiles?
I'm so scared!
They're already have nuclear weapons as a super duper weapon
@Iyas kelu
Maybe in the long run, but both require very large booster rockets. There really isn’t much difference in how they work though.
The Russian Avangard is the only hypersonic glide vehicle ICBM, and they aren’t replacing their entire inventory with it. The US is scheduled to replace all 450 Minuteman III’s in the next 10 years or so. It’s possible those could be with hypersonic glide vehicles. A better option might be MIRV warheads. That’s an older method but being able to lob multiple warheads on each rocket might be a superior method. That remains to be seen.
The Arrow missile we are working on is similar to the Chinese DF-17 and 21. Not meant to carry nukes, it’s a tactical weapon for rapid response.
@@ravenmoon5111 DF-17 and 21 are nuclear capable though, the 21 is nuclear only AFAIK.
@@davidste60
Thank you for the correction on the DF21.
@@ravenmoon5111 No problem.
Sounds good. Where can I get one?
on line,, China has heaps
Lockheed is selling on eBay, but I think you need to be a US citizen to buy it.
Who let the Russian trolls out
Mach 20 is 15, 345.4 mph.
If a American pilot fired that missile at a enemy 100 miles away, the enemy has around 24 seconds.
What makes it worst is that most enemy radar systems in their planes won't pick up anything past 50 to 60 miles away. That only gives the pilot 12 seconds to react. .......... Damn!
That size is optimal, i think its a upgrade to the tomahawk
totally new
Is not related to the Tomahawk. Tomahawk is a subsonic missile, not a boost glide weapon.
Both have their applications
I'd be interested to see the price comparison once it's finalized. Tomahawks are something like $1M a shot, if I'm remembering the criticism in the media when Trump dropped ~60 of them on a Syrian airfield for gassing their own civilians in 2017. These, I suspect will be more. So, the question then becomes, what do you need killed badly enough to spend over $1M on a missile to take it out?
@@kma3647 it saves not risking a pilots life, and a bomb dropped from an airplane isn't that cheap. It's close to 200 grand to fly a fighter for an hour.
Surya missile to deliver stealth nuclear warheads in stealth mode anywhere in the world at thousands of targets,at hypersonic speeds.
Maybe you should work on some more closer to home issues before wasting money on a such a useless weapon.
stop dreaming nuclear weapons are USELESS.
@@MostlyPennyCatbro first confirms the genders in america😂😂😅😅. Then give suggestion to us we are doing better for our people😂😂😅😅.
The AGM-183A....AKA: "YOU'RE FIRED!" missile. Or: The "TOE-TAG".
👽⭐
It's much easier to make anything go hypersonic if you drop the object from orbit. Wasting money trying to achieve the feat without high altitude isn't cost effective compared to launching a rocket and delivering a weapon system downward. Sure it's an additional option, but accuracy and effectiveness takes top priority over speed.
Accuracy and effectiveness matter but it’s all for naught if someone shoots down your missile before it gets to its target
We have dark eagle hypersonicmissiles. Sm 6 sm3 hypersonic missiles. Also Thaad is hypersonic mach 8.
@@t.3465mirv
I wonder if they will call it the Skybolt II?
What do you mean?? It will of course be called super duper missile.
Really? 3.5 TONS is now a lightweight? Maybe compared to an ICBM!
Mach 20: 22,506 feet per second.
¿Will this be replaced by Extra Duper Super Missiles?
Replaced by Rods from God.
Apparently it only flies to the “right” !
They should put hypersonic missles in space like the rod from God, that way no need for aircraft launch.
Uncle sam trying to catch up! Lol
@@JohnGone-wl8uo In russia and china already in service!
@@JohnGone-wl8uo search df17
Mach 20!!! That’s over 15,000 mph. How can anyone stop or see something going that fast!!
Quite easily, actually. Many American ICBMs fly at Mach 23.
That will be used in the Iranian war .
Iran self have hypersonic 4 years ago16 mach .today they have 4 different model.and us hypersonic lost in number 2 test.
I wish we could stop this shit and learn to get along with people.
Money and power ruins countries relation
Sounds like Darpa was cought with it's pants down.
The Russians and the Chinese don't understand that we've been working with hypersonic missiles for quiet considerable. Of time and we have a lot of experience with them but we didn't want to escalate the arms race into development in them oh, but we did our research development and we put it on the shelf and this is more than 40 years ago so everything Hypersonic that Russia is developing it we've had it for the years ago and now we're going to redeploy it if we need to
But western countries can't shoot them down with interceptors, and the plasma that surrounds them in flight is very resistant to lasers. That's what has attracted Russia and China, it's not about saying "you can't do this" (although they can't yet, research is only research), it's about saying "you can't stop this" (because they are getting closer to being able to stop all of the older missiles).
Lying won't make you safe.
What are you talking about, come on. Russia also has been working on hypersonic since 80s. And you have never had what is Russia having for today. Of course you will also develop hypersonics, its not a secret, but just after some time. At the moment you are behind in the hypersonic race.
you mean like how usa now struggles to develop until 2030 an icbm that russia has since 2018? lmfao that dude is right. lying wont make you safe
哈哈哈哈，很像印度人的自信，开始自己安慰
This is Osiris knut
Wouldn’t want one of those pointed at me...
Are we waiting for a successful test?
One billion.
Thaad Thaddeus . . . high context “inside” joke . . . (C.I.A.)
The talk is like it’s ready and it works. In practice it’s we are flying it around attached to a 1950 s bomber ….be afraid!
So does it actually work?
Yes, they got it to fly and detonate
@@esh9x153 just failed the test, the second time😅
No they lost
@@akltom weird because it did fine just a while back. Good try.
If missile can do 10mach or 15mach
mugzag afl si shegzag irtun alogan .
Can we see it flying?
No doubt 👍🏾
Can you give mr permission to translate the video in regional language telugu and upload in my channel on your name
👉🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸#1
🤣
@@aerodynamic1440 🤢🤮
@@aerodynamic1440 well yeah it is true, Russia is still being sanctioned by the USA which means usa still the police
@@user-vx2fw7qe1n not for any longer . Russia and china are going to beat us in few years . In 5 years chinese economy will be higher than us economy and i bet russian military will be stronger
@@kosovoisserbia8937 yeah here is the thing, that is really never going to happen, you do not know what the usa has because they are secretive as fuck, hell they even have jet packs like black ops 2 or exo suits like advance warfare, and American economy is very strong considering that you buy a phone, which is American, and do you eat bread and wheat? That is American, I can go on, but it is better, america keeps peace, Russia is too ambitions along with China which is no bueno
cool. will it cost 1 trillion dollars like their last program?
1.1 trillion
A solid rocket booster isn't as impressive as a scram-jet based engine.
When you compare Mach speeds, it is.
B-52 should at least be able to launch 15 such missile s all at once and be nuclear tipped
The most expensive truck kill.
It's not the truck, but who's in it...
Hypersonic nuclear missiles long range
Note without ad visiter advertiser only recommended thank you
4:56 I guess Maine isn’t part of the US anymore
kh47 vs this
Why are Europeans so surprised at the technology abilities of Americans?
1000
✓
The body is mostly fuel
The main warhead isnso small, it should carry nuclear instead conventional explosive warhead. Because it is so small.
"Hypersonic"
It's an ALBM lol, all ballistic missiles are hypersonic. It probably isn't any faster than the US' Skybolt ALBM from 1962.
in the terminal faze, it's likely to only travel at supersonic speeds
Do we still use the F1 17 Bomber 🤔
It was retired from active service in 2012, but at least a portion of the fleet has been maintained, and even flown.
No it’s been retired. After they lost one in the Iran 🇮🇷 war. The F22 and the F35 are more than capable fighters.
@@robertabell9182. You don't exactly know for certain but only speculating.
Brett Demauna Who died and made you the English teacher of the day. Go get a life and quit pestering people.
No the F-117A Nighthawk was retired from combat service in 2008 however starting in 2010 up until now the Air Force has been flying the F-117 at Area 51 all 52 F-117s that remain are being kept in special type 1000 storage where they can be fully maintain a handful of them are still flying they're testing new radar resorbing material and whatnot
The enemy of us that us is more rich than them more available technolgy
Hey ,by just talking only no real video of that ? Why ? If Russia says they got hypersonic bomb they provide true video.
I can see the Chinese copying this "super duper missle" in a year or two. Heck, it won't surprise me if they already "acquired" the blueprints of this thing!
@Mike 72 They actually developed this weapon first? Wow. Figures considering all the present tech they have. Not exactly good news for United States isn't it?
@@walterdayrit675 China has similar booster-glider hypersonic technology. But the current implementation in service is land based. You can search DF-17. It doesn't have fairing, so you can easily see the glider at the tip.
There are also videos showing a H-6 bomber carrying a air launched version of that missile, but its widely believe to be still in development, not combat ready yet.
@@walterdayrit675 they made it years age US hypersonic is Non-maneuverable.hypersonic.
Maybe this time US need try copy from them.
nah... you might wanna look at china's DF series. pretty much its usa trying to copy china this time
Fake it till you make it
1:41 Hypersonic weapon to destroy a truck. What a waste.
the head is miniscule. Even its is generally accepted that at these speeds, the cinetic energy is enormous, I wonder what could be put in such a small final part. Nuclear only ??
@@florentleider222 Kinematic performance should be enough to destroy a fixed or moving target like a ship. But I believe it'll come with explosives as well
That's why USAF scientists are currently developing low cost hypersonic refrigerators to destroy lower value targets. Current estimated budget only $584,075 per icebox.
@@4rct1c9Ic3m4n Nope, to destroy a ship you need more than that. Otherwise it would punch through a ship, exit from the other side, and do little damage. Unless it's a lucky hit that happens to detonate the ships ammunition, holes of that size can be easily patched.
Russia has hypersonic weapons that are already in production and deployed in Ukraine.
Not a nuclear weapon.
US is way behind to develop hypersonic
Not as far behind as you think. We’ve been playing with it since the late fifties and sixties.
Since we have been leaders in most everything it will take us a year or two to bypass them. And we've already started.
@@robertabell9182 So what? Where is a result of your playing? Still behind.
@@cameronwalker294 Leaders in most everithing!? Lol stop watching CNN and especially Hollywood .
@@andreyg.2388 I don’t play games! I don’t know where you came up with that question? It sure wasn’t what I was referring to. All day long Yahoo
Bueno soñar no cuesta nada el unico misil probado de eeuu hace 1año solo volaba a 4 mach y cuando lo pusieron en un avion se les cayo y abandonaron el proyecto y era de 4 mach nada mas y no lo lograron ..........sus hipersonicos de Rusia vuelan 27 mach para detenerlos primero tendrian que alcanzar su velocidad por que aparte de todo no son balisticos pues se auto dirigen segun sus condiciones suerte ......
Como les quedo el ojo a los latinos sin visa
Le pregunto cómo podrá entrar en los domos de los sistemas cuánticos rusos, los cuales ya le demostraron A USA, que no habrá arma capaz de llegar a su objetivo, por eso están atrasados en tecnologia, ya que siguen soñando con lo imposible, desde el año 2012 en la administración OBAMA, en una reunión en Bélgica, citada por IRAN, como poseedor de una tecnología súperior, y con más de 50 años de adelanto a todo lo creado por ser humano en este planeta, en la cual se le dio la oportunidad de ser el chico bueno, y abandonar la piratería de Naciones, si aceptaba acabar con la industria militar y direccionar el presupuesto militar en bienestar para el mismo pueblo americano, y en general para todas las Naciones, pero se negaron, entonces se les advirtió las consecuencias de seguir por el camino criminal, los entonces países que aceptaron la no utilizacion de esta tecnología para atacar naciones, solo se podrán usar para su defensa en caso de agresión, ; China, y Rusia, firman el pacto de paz, para poder acceder a esta.
Irán al no tener los centros de investigación y desarrollo tecnológico al nivel de estos dos países, entrega la nueva tecnología la cual no esta sujeta a las leyes de la física de tres dimensiónes, y por lo tanto toda la materia esta sujeta a su manipulación o destrucción de todos sus componentes electrónicos, al entrar en su zona de influencia, es así como ,satélites, barcos, submarinos, aviones, misiles etc, no podrán realizar su trabajo para el cual están diseñados, de modo que la ignorancia es atrevida, UD hace parte del rebaño, el cual está muy bien manejado por los medios del poder en la sombra, el tiempo de este seudopoder se empieza a desmoronar, es una lástima que los Romanos los hayan superado en tiempo y en dominio geopolítico, por lo menos así lo veo yo.
With what's going on in Ukraine. I doubt Russia has hypersonic weapons
thats because russia didnt bother using any hypersonic weapons in ukraine. a 5 second google search would right away tell you that russia is ahead of usa in terms of hypersonic missile
Here you go Puty Putin
Oh Project Falcon is what blew up Beruit baby. It was a test. #beruit #lebanon #projectfalcon
🇲🇨💪👍👌
So.. what is the fastest missile? the BrahMos or the AGM 1834?
This is totally different from BrahMos, this is more akin to a air-launched ballistic missile where as BrahMos is an anti-ship cruise missile. Its not an apples to apples comparison.
@@hasupe6520 Ohhh ok thanks for the info! appreciate it
AGM 183A
@@keinoquias1708 AGM 183A 👍
USA upgraded( sm6 block 6)goes mach 16 in navy service. Thaad goes mach 8. And dark eagle goes mach 15. All in military service
Get a Glory
aka the guided rocket,cause every hypersonic or long range missile has less homing than a rocket from a rocket pod
Not nuclear. Just a fast rock.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻 USA! Always!
failed during the second time test recently. at the same time, chinese df17 has been deployed for years
yea... China! always!😌
@@akltom China is a terrible dictatorship, has been for quite a while. Feel sorry for Chinese people, they don’t know what freedom is.
@@Interactive-gp8xf have you ever been to china? you are brainwashed mate😅
@@akltom Chinese troll! 🤖🤖🤖
Yes Non-maneuverable hypersonic its like you talk about a fossil.
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
El superduper el misil de donald trump
Still years behind Russia in hypersonic missiles
Ahahah BS !
Hypersonic flight and test was already made by the US in the 60's. Dream on
@@DOI_ARTS the current US missile arsenal is really bad compared to Russians
@@aerodynamic1440 Actually we have many many weapons from DARPA that are way too classified to come out yet
Bruh u belive the country that has started the most fights and makes the most weapons to be behind? SMH
777
A high-tech weapon with only 20kg of charge in a warhead. 😁👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
I always love finding the dipshits in the comments. The missile is under testing and has no specified dedicated warhead yet.
Spam more emojis tho, sure that will help. Roflmfao
The impact speed alone is very destructive, so there wont be need for a large warhead
Getting hit at hypersonic speeds is more than enough to destroy a target. You probably don't even need the explosive.
Kinetics
Russia Kingell travels at 10 times the speed of sound an is already fitted to 10 Mig 31. Also in serial production. Where is Amerika's? 🌴🇷🇺🇷🇺
This one will travel 20 times the speed of sound
Sure. Just like you're name is "Dave".
We don't need one, we're not going to invade Russia or China and they're not going to invade us.
@@timper4326 Its not even only about invasion of these 3 countries to each other. Its a Joker in the geopolitical games.
@@blakecoleman4577 First develop at least 10M. And Russia is already having more than 20M glider yes different system but much more powerful.
it failed this week
Please change the name and get rid of the super dupper because it sounds like something a child would say 60 years ago.
Not a good prize
They laughed when Trump mentioned it. They're not laughing now.
He'll yes!! Thank God for president Trump!!!
You bumped your head!
It's going to be a massacre..😆
failed for the second time.
Why US fears Russia?
It's part of Marxist ideology to take over the world. They are a constant threat, and we are the only thing stopping them from taking Europe.
@@ChironZore So true…
@@ChironZore Marxist ideology? Lol do you remember that today is 2021 year!? And USSR stopped existing in 1991.
Fear my foot**. It's only in the dream of you Indians. Where is your USSR now after defeated by USA in Cold War????
This is not a hypersonic missile. The nose cone in the wrong geometry.
This AGM-183 does not seem to work the same way as it's Russian counterpart. Russian hypersonic missiles do not need to have a boost glide feature. They can also be fitted with nuclear warheads. I don't think the AGM-183 can be. It just seems to be some solid projectile that separates from the booster and glides to it's target. There is also no mention of maneuverability. Russian hypersonic missiles are highly maneuverable.
That’s not going to be as practical as most hypersonic weapons. It’s too big for a fighter to carry, it’s not an air to air or anti ship weapon
It can be carried by F-15s and F-16s, dude.
Oh look, a RUclips expert
Outdated INFORMATION😅