Consensus vs Chat GPT and Google | Research | Literature Search| Basic Science Series

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии • 3

  • @jatsantsa
    @jatsantsa 18 дней назад

    Using google and chatGTP for information as researcher? Guys if you are doing this in your research, that is just bad.

    • @BasicScienceSeries
      @BasicScienceSeries  17 дней назад +1

      I don't think you have seen the video?? How bad those resources are and how consensus can help is discussed in this. I am sorry if the msg was not conveyed. But please watch the video first 🙏🏻

    • @jatsantsa
      @jatsantsa 17 дней назад

      @@BasicScienceSeries Google is super bad, yes later you mentioned it why, you got the point. However conclusion is do not use google. I stopped with google more than 5y ago after I had to write long string with a lot of -""& just to get something new in search, not to mention it took me half a day to cracked it and I do not even searched for article, but for machine/technology. Like wikipedia (english one) is much better than google (in fact I love to use it for genes as there are link to all coll DBs). So yeah Do NOT use ever use google in research as it is bias alghoritm.
      btw You are right I did not finished video as I am not googling (should still be nice for patents) and already using chatGPT(like for coding R), so I skipped the rest. However you got me to learn more about consensus AI as I learn about this weekend and I saw your video yesterday.