Why does the SpaceX droneship camera cut out?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2024
- SpaceX provides some of the most spectacular sights in spaceflight with the landing of their Falcon 9 booster. But why does the video feed always seem to cut out right as the booster is coming in to land on the droneship?
If you enjoyed this video and would like to see more, remember to subscribe and hit the notification bell so you know when the next video comes out.
Support Primal Space by becoming a Patron!
/ primalspace
Follow me on Twitter!
/ theprimalspace
Facebook: / theprimalspace
Music used in this video:
» Secret Conversations - The 126ers
» Soul - Grandbankss
» Back To Vik - Leviathe
anyone here after falcon 9's launch and camera cut ?
me! millions spent but can't spend on more cameras
Yeah, Im waiting for spacex to release footage
Yea man its so annoying. Waited a damn year for that
@@manuelbf510 Congrats on completely missing the point. Did you watch this video?
#1 If they know it's not going to work why bother streaming it live #2 ships have wifi and have signal strength on any part of the ocean , why not connect a phone to the wifi and live stream 😂
Two years later and SpaceX's droneships still lose signal when the boosters land. Great video, especially because it got recommended at the perfect time, though it definitely seems like not everyone in the comments has watched it. To all those that ignored the video or are annoyed that SpaceX isn't doing anything to fix this problem: the livestream, your entertainment, is not the biggest priority in a mission where they're proving to NASA that their privately-built rockets and capsules are here to stay.
obviously they want to keep it secret from other super power countries. its like giving away the kfc recipe. you dont
$55m per trip but can’t afford a ship to get it right? 🧐
@@johnro7456 Keep what a secret? The whole landing gets uploaded afterwards.
Chewstamania 74 they can afford it but it’s not worth the time and effort, unlike making sure the rocket safely lands
@@johnro7456 ruclips.net/video/bvim4rsNHkQ/видео.html
The solution is actually super simple. Put some merlin engines on the satellite and make it vibrate at the exact same rate. Solved.
😂😂😂
LOL
@Tag Ret Stfu
I had to read this several times, I'm sure if you're a genius or sarcastic.
can't tell if you're sarcastic or a fucking genius lol
I’m more interested to know why the cable I pay for every month keeps cutting out.
😂
BWAHAHHHH!
sadness
Stop landing orbital class rockets in your backyard. 😂
same
They cut the camera so that the ompalompas can place the ship down
Iol!!!!
Best comment I've seen tonight!! 😂😂
@eemc2cu but you can see the actual engine of the booster coming in to the picture? I've always tried to respect other people's beliefs but do you by any chance also believe in Nazi's on the moon? 🤔😂
EDIT: and please educate yourself by looking up "gravity turn" that'll explain the 'inexplicable' curve 😉
@eemc2cu hahaha lol you're a funny guy. Well I think you've never been in a plane bc you think those are fake too, but from a plane you can actually see circular rainbows, even while looking towards the ground. The rainbow curves bc you're at 42 degrees of the sunlight refracting (and reflecting) in raindrops (and clouds etc). Furthermore, when using a pressure washer at home, you can also see circular rainbows if you look at the right angle, even though there only a foot in diameter at most. Both of the cases above instantly debunk the involvement of any hypothetical dome in the curving of rainbows. I'm all for asking weird questions, that's what advances science, but please don't ask any weird questions that have been answered and proven many many years ago. Good luck educating yourself man!
I fkn knew it
This recommendation was the best thing the algorithm has done for me yet.
The Algorithm just ended this man’s whole career (Elon Musk’s)
I can relate
Short answer for this video: because it is so fake as Musk said, as long as the Earth is Flat and Enclosed, thus there is no such thing as "Space".
Andrey DKS you’re far off man
Romans 10:9-11 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, “Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame.”
"So the vibrations will disturb shit, Mike. It's impossible to do it."
"But, couldn't we use another vessel to..."
"For a couple of seconds of footage? Cost-benefit ratio would be insane. Too costly."
"Listen, we've got emergency boats here, I can just take one out five minutes before the rocket lands, film all this with my phone and send it to our twitter in a couple of minutes."
"......I've made my decision, Mike!"
underrated
So you don't believe video from SpaceX, but you would believe video from a SpaceX employee?
They should put the antenna on a stabiliser like camera gimbals
poor Elon, can't afford it
@@LesVertsAlgerie no u
wont be enough, the shockwaves are super powerful
or use a drone
@@HugoHoutzager or they can put camera on another ship.
lol i was watching the dragon launch and i was like “dang it i wanted to see it land”
Same
lol
Same
Same
Same
And they just landed all three perfectly. Woo
I watched that just off the cuff, didn't realise I was about to watch something so historic.
Luke Parsons that’s what I was thinking
Allegedly...
It cut out again today hmm?
@@nardussnyman2190 ya they didnt have enough money for cgi for the landing part
Thanks for letting us know about the recordings being made available after! I feel much better now.
1:10 "of course I still love you"
just the name of a droneship along with "just read the instructions"
Also theres Mischief and Ghost Hunter or something, I like their names..
AnthonydoesYT ms chief, ms tree, go searcher, and go navigator are fairing recovery ships
Several second time delay would solve it, like a memory buffer. It wouldn’t be the real time transmission but for the viewers it will not make a bit difference
thought the same man
even a minute wouldnt make that much of a difference
The issue with that is if you have the delay be applied automatically from the drone ship, you just move the delay to a different part of the video, if you do it manually from anywhere else the lag will still be there. You would need to delay a whole lot more than just the drone ship video feed. Not really worth it. Also engineers wouldn't get to see exactly if the landing was successful until after the delay is finished.
@@dolphay4357 First I prefer seeing "live" the landing itself, and second, If you upload 20s of pre recorded footage (from 1 minute before) right before the connexion is expected to be lost, it would make the transition seemless
indeed, since the rocket itself is fully AI controlled, nobody benefits from an ultrafast live feed
they know by now how many seconds of disturbance they usually get, so they can just delay the broadcast for that amount and have the broadcast catch up with the live feed for a while
When you can send rockets to space and have them land at the same time in perfect unison. But can’t figure out how to get FaceTime to work.
@Guns N Glory great ide
FaceTime and creating rockets aren't on the same level those are two different things
I bet your face time will be fuck if a rocket try to land beside you also lol...
It's not that they don't have a solution... it's just it's not worth the cost. Why bother... when you can save thousands of dollars.
The same can be said about rescue missions on Everest. We can send man to the moon, but can't get someone off' Everest🤔
@@ohmyreally3745 learn what cgi is
And if you believe that explanation. Then you'll believe that I sell ice cubes to penguins.
Short answer: vibrations during the landing causes signal misalignment between the cam and satellite.
lol
Daniel Archer lul
Thank you. 5 min compacted into one sentence.
He’s not joking
Funny ! They should market in antennas of such great directivity!
Seeing those boosters return and land at the cape will never get old. It's just some straight Buck Rogers stuff.
Seeing one land (five years ago) gave me goosebumps. Seeing two land in synchrony in the same video shot gave me palpitations and I cried.
I would do anything to see that in person. And yes, that includes wearing Princess Ardala's obedience marriage collar.
Mariasol Nevada
Flat earther spotted?
kimsmithih really? Well aren’t you simple
@Mariasol Nevada you can thank technology that this is real, but if you think this is fake, you should think the same thing about electronics because we don't know how they work, just that they do and that they exist and function LIKE the Falcon 9 🤣🤣🤣
It can't be that hard to figure out, it's not rocket scie.....
Nice one
hahahaha
O3O
C Smith yep, it’s television
😆
i love myself for immediately thingking "oh the feed probably bugged because the signal was interrupted by the OBVIOUSLY GIANT ASS rocket" when watching the live feed
Sometimes I want to kill myself when I see all those flat earthers, but then there is people like you who I consider my saviour.
Lmfao
I think the recording was picked because it's the most reliable solution. It would be nice if they put those few seconds back during the live feed just pause it and just put a sign there that says pausing for 10 seconds or something
Welp, welcome everyone who just saw it happening again from the human launch
ey lmao
Yoo
Kek
Yeah, Im waiting for spacex to release footage
Anish Kasegaonkar there is no footage it fake. You all are being fooled and trying so hard to be true because it will crash world beliefs
Primal space: why does the spacex droneship camera cut out?
Flatearther:THEY faked it!
@@carlwest this video
@@carlwest so your saying that this is CGI?
@@prots-5641 another flat fuck
flat fuck:it was CGI!!
😂
@@carlwest so, you are saying, in order to fake the landing, CGI is used? Do you know how much work needs to be done?? You needed to create an EXACT replica of the drone ship, and the EXACT same lighting conditions with fog and any other things, and then you need to get the material of everything EXACTLY perfect, not to mention the amount of editing you have to do, and anyways this IS a live feed, ad you can clearly see that the feed is synced up with the rocket (you can see it during launch).
This was a recommended video. I saw the live launch last week and was very disappointed not to see the booster land. Now I know the reason, so thanks for posting.
I'm lost
Thank you for getting right to the point. That's rare in these times
Easy: Just make the satellite jiggle in sync.
yea, creating another problem and ducktape, that's we call engineering
I’m dead he said make it jiggle
You are quite the problem solver my friend. Elon's got nothin on you.
Thats hyperthink my friend, front of the class !
"The of course I love you"
Someone at SpaceX is a culture fan.
I have a feeling that someone is Elon himself, as it isn't the only one:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_spaceport_drone_ship
Of course I still love you*
What it's from ?
@@user-wk6ek3iz3k The names of the ships in the Iain M Banks 'Culture' novels.
They also have the "Just Read The Instructions". We all know what they'll name the third droneship once they get it.
Are you kidding. I am an Average Joe and I can think of multiple easy fixes for that "problem". 1) wider beam - higher power antenna. Certainly they can afford it to film a spaceship landing, right? 2) you don't need a separate SHIP to avoid vibrations. You just need a stabilized platform for the antenna. 3) you can combine 1+2. The cost would be a few kUSD at max. So for me this "cutting the transmission" thing is just all intentional. Especially when during the last Dragon flight also the orbital transmission was interrupted at approximately the same important moment.
They can launch a rocket in reverse, but they can't figure out how to throw a couple pillows under the transmitter. 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
If a rocket lands at sea. And no ones around to see it. Does it land?
MJW it should be if I poop my pants and I don't feel it, have a I really poop my pants
no because it is still on it's way to land. maybe we can call it "caught on a ship" or it is still on transhipment.
NO, IT FKN SINKS.
No, it doesn't land. I T S E A S.
Niiiice one! ❤🙏❤
I thought it was so that Jeff bezos won’t copy their landing recipe
@eemc2cu You shut up your mouth
@eemc2cu They take a large curve so that they can enter orbit. It would be impossible to orbit the planet by just going straight up.
@eemc2cu please just shut up
eemc2cu Shut up dude, your like one of those people that think that coronavirus is a hoax created by world governments lol
eemc2cu Its a booster, Its not made to go into orbit. Let alone the upper atmosphere. Do YOUR research on rockets and how they work before you say something that makes no sense.
People: I'm going to watch a historic moment on live TV!
TV: cuts out for a few seconds
Also People: It was a fake landing!
You mean fake take off haha
@@sharonwilson7074 touché. Takeoff in reverse? :)
@@caligana now that's genius it's not landing it's takeoff in reverse
It's amazing how many people who still live at home with mommy and maybe a daddy can be so intelligent and have a such deep understanding of physics and aerospace technology that they can ridicule these events. I assure both of you, you couldn't pronounce the degrees these people have and your eyes would glaze over within minutes of sitting in one of the classes they took.
@@ruffxm for the record I was being sarcastic
One solution could be to install a very powerful shock absorber (like an advanced suspension system) between the transmitter and the ship so that the vibration won't get to shake the transmitter. Just a thought. Though most probably someone in SpaceX had thought about this idea before.
When I saw the camera cut out during the dragon landing I out laughed out loud knowing conspiracy theorists would have a field day with this one
There are no theorists when they can provide truth. They do cuts because they need time to release some of the oxygen out of the dirigible for stability. And here's what then happens: ruclips.net/video/bvim4rsNHkQ/видео.html
Super Saiyan 3 I find you hilarious, weeb
@@Black-Circle I find it hilarious that you are so dumb.
@@Black-Circle When will idiots like you understand NASA ISN'T THE ONLY SPACE AGENCY! Fuck, they're not even the only organization that goes to or studies space! Figured you'd understand that by now, given you're on a Space X video, but no, with you idiots it's always "NASA this!" & "NASA that!" as if countless others have nothing to do with the subject. Yeah, the Soviets & all the other space agencies just decided they were going to help the US lie about the moon landingS (PLURAL)....figure I need to specify that since others of your ilk constantly harp on the first moon landing while forgetting there were more than one. Even you said "in the 1960's" which completely disregards the others from the 1970's.
@@Black-Circle Russia could have annihilated the US's credibility. It was the height of the fucking COLD WAR.
They didn't. There are millions of people involved in this sort of thing. All it would take is one credible source and it would be *done.* There are retroreflectors ON THE MOON that amateur astronomers have been bouncing lasers off of for YEARS. There is so much evidence against you and you toss it all away as "lies". You're not just ignorant, you're willfully ignorant. You can see the facts out in front of you and yet you willfully ignore them.
Stop guzzling the conspiracy kool-aid. It'll be better for you.
"You are about.. 2 years too early"
wym
Nathanael Zoe it was made 2 year ago
@MySecretMessages It's an Endgame meme.
So many uncultured swines smh
Good meme my friend
@MySecretMessages
Cool.
So many easy fix options that don't require huge investments.
*Add a 15 second delay to the live broadcast which is normal anyway in case someone swears etc accidentally on live TV.
*Move the transmitting antenna to be suspended above a vibration-absorbing material, gimble etc.
*Transmit to the nearby recovery ship.
etc
I just can't believe they haven't addressed this yet.
they could broadcast from the platform, to a small drone (outside the jet wash), up to the sat
It would need a very large drone for the antenna
Man I was thinking way too complex. Like static build or radiation. Nah. Just doing the truffle shuffle
Cuz it's FAKE AF that's why
so they can't mount a stable antenna on a second ship
and pigtail the signal because why ? the cable would be too long . . . ??
I must be using too much rocket science on that as well...
I too figgered the rocket juice was interrupting the signal,
not the mechanical vibrations overcoming the limitation
of the digitalized signal broadcast.#harmonics
I was thinking the body of the rocket reflected the signal or something like that.
@Sanuk Jang Lery yea they mentioned that sorta, the problem once again is that the cost/benefit ratio isn't all the great. They would have to add a whole new vessel for what's like 3 seconds. That can be a lot of money for that little time
@Watchdog it's just a big thruster, no reason for radiation.
who’s watching during the first manned dragon launch
Sal what you doing here😂😂
@BC Bob I bet you also don't see the excitement of people going to school which has been happening for hundreds of years....
Bruh stfu i see way to many of these comments
@BC Bob he meant that it is the first spaceX launch with humans with it
Commercial flight is now possible this is great!
They can land a rocket on a ship but they cannot send live feed of the most iconic moment 🤦
Maybe it's just not worth their time / resources to tackle this issue that is entirely irrelevant to the success of their mission?
Fortunately a year later, they solved this problem and the rest is history. Looking forward to all the Starship test flights and missions.
Fake
My proposed solution: Just make a software change so that if the feed goes out, when it comes back, it ends up getting replayed with an "instant replay" label or something. At least then we get to see it! (even if slightly non-live)
The current situation is so much worse: you potentially end up waiting hours until someone finds and links to the later-uploaded video with the 5-seconds of missed footage.
Wow, so simple, this needs more likes.
Definitely a good idea - if it transmits a buffer.
I'm not sure if it transmits a buffer, to me it sounds more logical that it just transmits a live signal (to save bandwidth). The actual footage is in that case pulled off the droneship itself physically or transmitted at a later moment when there's no live broadcast anymore.
Maybe they could use a spring to dampen high frequency vibrations and a series of actuators to keep the lock, though that would probably be a bit expensive to develop.
@@DvDick I think they already do, but those merlin engines at 5 meters are just a bit thrusty :)
Most of the time, if not all the time, this video is transmitted via UDP rather than TCP. So that means you can lose packets. To make it TCP would require a receive antenna onboard which again increases cost for 2 seconds. If you are a computer performing calculations you want real time data not buffered data (TCP). If you lose data you can handle that more gracefully. But knowing whether it is buffered or not is a whole bigger problem.
Thanks for explaining an issue like this for someone like me who is a total layman! I appreciate the effort.
They didn't upload the falcon heavy core landing footage until now... one week after the arabsat 6a launch...
Yeah, you believe everything they tell you like gospel. There's just no way to record something at Sea, lmfao!
@@nova396 what do you mean? the onboard camera recorded, but couldn't transmit while the rocket lands. So they can get the footage later and upload it like they did before
LOL...you are hilarious! Perhaps you need to understand that we did this AND remote controlled a camera rig off the MOON!!! 50 YEARS ago, 23700 MILES AWAY!!! Not 50 yards!!!! Keep drinking the koolaid!!!LOL All the world is a stage, and the landing pad of SpaceX is NO different.
@@philindeblanc Yeah, but the Lunar Lander upper stage generated 15,6 kN thrust. One Merlin 1D engine produces 845 kN thrust - at sea level; in vacuum 914 kN - see the difference?
To compare: booster landing: ruclips.net/video/sHRqu0ZzHYQ/видео.html Apollo 17 last liftoff from moon: ruclips.net/video/9HQfauGJaTs/видео.html
1. A tethered flying drone off the end of the ship with the antenna, for vibration isolation. Hover the drone over the water, away from the incoming flight path of the booster.
2. Hover the antenna a few inches above its mount like the puck of an air hockey game. Vibration isolation achieved. Add a skirt like a hovercraft to contain the air flow. The signal cable will have slack coiled beneath the air skirt.
And my cynical mind was telling me that Space-X intentionally cuts the feed in case the landing is unsuccessful; they don't want the public to see a potential failure. Great video! Thanks for clarifying!! :)
That would be a first. They've broadcast every single failure when they could and even made a compilation of failures and posted it online.
We are all so suspicious of everything now. Haha
As you should be.
@@Fourwedge no. No you shouldn't be. Healthy skepticism and mindless skepticism are two different things. Especially when it comes to something as black and white as space launches.
It’s not mindless skepticism this part comes back to earth hitting an exact point on a tiny platform in the middle of the ocean....I haven’t seen an explanation on how this is achieved....or have I just missed it?
PantoMath ya Earth is flat yo
@2be Blunt SpaceX is a private company, they do their own private launches for elon's starlink satellites and contract's from countries outside of the US all the time.
Camera: _cuts out_
Flat Earthers: *ITS FREE REAL ESTATE*
🤣🤣
Indeed :P
"REE IT NOT REA-" no karen, you're just f***ing stupid.
@Mariasol Nevada go away troll
@Mariasol Nevada you had to go to his channel to find something bad to say about him, phenomenal job
Hey Luke, excellent video. Although your hypothesis on vibration is the likely cause of signal loss, it could also be the massive heat signature of the Merlin engines that disrupts the high-frequency uplink. Either way, my solution from the beginning has been to incorporate a separate drone ship in a repeater configuration as you depicted, but with a twist. Such a repeater drone could be deployed and retrieved by the recovery drone ship. It could even be a very large buoy. If heat is the culprit that disrupts the signal, the RF link between the mother ship and the repeater uplink should be low frequency, high power.
Hahhaha almost everyone here are from last week space x - NASA launch lol
These few seconds of live video are priceless. Its like cutting out a goal in a sports game.
But People who doubt that it's real, will never change their mind because of the live video.
Enthusiasts will not get less enthusiastic about spaceflight.
So my conclusion is, it's just not worth the extra hassle to have it live.
mittamoa this is the right answer. There’s essentially no reason for SpaceX to spend the money to figure out something that is, for them, a non-problem.
People who think its not real are not even worth the trouble, they do what they to for science, not to change a fool's mind
That is not it. That's like cutting out the player who passed the ball to the person who was going to score the goal later going back to his original position. It's simply not necessary.
But we need that footage. If you don't- it's only your personal.
@@GrrrRu you dont NEED the footage, we only have the privilege to see it, bet we dont need to, you want to, thats different
My son works for SpaceX and in fact was found at 18 years old after a science fair demonstrating a new kind of gyroscope system he invented. I can tell you it is real and no fake stuff. He has explained there is a high degree of emf at the end of the recovery due to a series of pulses that are emitted and it is not avoidable. even with a cable they lose signal and due to the burst output. It is more complicated than this video and without giving out data on a propriety system, he can't explain further.
Cam on, No extra ship is needed. Just film the landing from the near by drone. Even the armature version of many drones have the capability of live transmission.
By the way, the transmission antenna could be mounted on the gimbal to cancel all vibration.
I'm dissapointed. I was hoping it was due to aliens.
it was, they just don't tell you.
@@hawkeye1836 everytime all of our TVs and Livestreams stutter or freeze its because an alien ran across the screen and they don't want us to know!
@@TheDeepState2001 Hey, remember, there are no more U.F.O.'s, they are now, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (U.A.P.) solve the U.F.O. problem, just rename it. So, they did.
Aliens aren’t real
Lmao I was thinking the same thing
Put a camera on a dolphin
Or, as suggested below, just delay the live footage transimition by 10 seconds so the vibrations will end before it starts broadcasting.
great idea you should work for Trump
Whys my dolphin not working
That's what I was saying!
@@timsfinalburnerlolxd4351 Because it's black
Yes
How about just adding a really big gimbal to the video feed antenna!?
Starlink completely solved this problem! Future is now. We have a crystal clear relay until the touchdown even from the booster onboard camera. Thats astonishing. I mean not many people thought about this solution years ago.
Who's watching after Demo-2's thruster lagging droneship again?
Is it just me or is it wayyyy more badass with the camera cutting
@@neb4587 its just you
Something as precious as this surely placing another camera vessel next to the landing barge.
The evening one the other night was kick ass, as you could see the blue ocean reflection and the platform light up. Evening entries are terrific for the reason. Peace.
Finally I got the answer to my curiosity..I was watching the historical Dragon crew Launch live and when the landing of Falcon9 was not shown exactly at the time of touching the ship then I became curious about why this happened.Now I got it😇
It cut out today aswell... Thanks for the explanation
Yep
Luke Vuidreketi lol I was watching the live stream
@Euigyeom Choi we are talking about this one: ruclips.net/video/DPfHHls50-w/видео.html
Yes it's from april 11th, don't know why but it was live yesterday
Yall falling for these fake livestreams
How’s the boat not just sink from all the force on it and how tf does the rocket not tip
I always just assumed they cut it off in case the rocket crashes, so they don’t have to put it out there live, for all the world to see as its happening hahah
manifestgtr I feel that has more to do with it than anyone wants to confirm.
Jane Smith so wouldn’t that confirm they do in fact get footage of these drone ship landings?
Jane Smith
Oh totally and I’ve seen those, by the way. My line of thinking was more about them wanting to control the narrative and release the video alongside an explanation of what went wrong so the public doesn’t just go “ERMEGERRR ROCKET CRASH!” until spacex can’t put it into context for them. For the record, I accept the explanation given in this video. It makes just as much sense.
Same
huh? they've already had multiple crashes happen live, they're not very secretive about their failures lmao
Good Explanation Clears my Doubts - Thanks 👍
the way of doing this right is to employ an autonomous flying drone to take off from the drone ship at the right time and record and transmit the footage from distance then land back to the drone ship, also the footage will be much better from the angle perspective also the new drones can transmit at 10-15 km the signal so can be transmitted from a boat that is close to the drone ship, that boat can also control the drone if needed, can be used more then one drone to do this one to be static and one to track the rocket booster, if you see that nice footage is made from distance.
"of course I still love you"
I love you too inter-galactic space travel..
No i don't mean like that it's a setence written on launch pad lol
@@inter-galactictravellerspa9036 Its the ships name :) and i know..
@@Vatsyayana87 ok
They gotta toss the conspiracy theorists a fresh bone every now and then.
like what conspiracy would that even be?
@@S1nwar That the rocket is fake
It is fake
@@S1nwar Flat Earthers mostly. The entire idea of Space Travel relies on the fact that the Earth is round, so space travel and rockets re-entering Earth is not possible in their eyes.
Qpilled Anon Rehabilitated but like it’s not
And the engineers just somehow missed this detail of the landing.
It's so you can't see them pulling a "Capricorn One" .
Haha! And I’m old enough that I didn’t have to google this to understand it. 😆👍
They're clearly been taught by it.
@Keith M Seems like OJ was running from the 'law' in that one, too.
It is the new religion. Gives all you money and we will "promise" to take you to Mars.
@@Lamster66@Haha, you're such a funnyman. So you're saying it's currently fake? But in next 20 years it won't be? By next 2-decades they would've graduated from "knob" polishers, to world travelers. That's new! Very ballsy.
Some of these clowns don't even know, how to work an electronic car-mirror. So 20 years is pretty optimistic.
People in here talking like rocket scientists lmao.
*here
@@adamt7142 oops, fixed it
these bulls dont knoww shiiitttt/////// we call'em FAKE X
@@LOVEBUNNNY and we call you stupid :)
Rocket is just an improvement from ancient technology since Chinese Dynasty.
Rocket is not really a very sophisticated stuff if you are in the level of Engineer.
They landed their booster for the fifth time without any loss of footage on 'Just Read The Instructions' drone ship, following their Starlink mission on June 3, 2020.
Perhaps the engineers read the instructions when they installed the camera.
Tj Green lol
Tj Green with of course I still love you they gave up on reading the instructions but they wanted it to know they still love it
You don't need an extra ship, just a drone flying around the ship....
They did it today! Mission accomplished!
OF COURSE I STILL LOVE YOU HAVE LANDED
Who's here for falcon 9 and wondering why 😂
I'm just binge watching rocket videos now =P
Me
At least 72 people including myself haha
Yessss. I was searching for the answer, because it intrigued me a lot and get worst when i saw others videos that was cut too, but the reason makes sense. (I would love if Elon fix just to shut up of the conspiracyists)
Omg yeah
A video camera cutting out at a critical moments can only mean one thing. A cover up.
Uh, then why are satellites, stations (ISS & others) exists?
Also the ISS could be seen with the naked eye if u try hard enough
The simplest and cheapest solution would be a couple of heavy platforms between the barge and antenna, that could vibrate less, at a slower frequency. They could also hang the antenna on the side, with a long and heavy part, down deep in the water.
Me: watches the launch..
RUclips: SPACE VIDEOS!!!!!
ZSTRODE. same
Here was me thinking this was gonna be some nutty conspiracy video, and it turned out to be a perfectly coherent, logical explanation.
What is this?! This is not the RUclips I know.
Humanity is evolving, huzzah!
@@whwhwhhwhhhwhdldkjdsnsjsks6544 I wish. Just look at some of the comments.
howard baxter dammit
“Hey, Gymball, *WE NEED YOU* “
Let’s just think about how AMAZING the Falcon 9 rocket is for a moment:
We have a rocket LANDING VERTICALLY on a floating barge in the middle of the ocean, on an “X” marked on the center of the barge... and our biggest technical glitch is the satellite camera feed losing lock.
THIS ROCKET IS AN INCREDIBLE ENGINEERING FEAT!!
Can launch rockets into space and bring them back landing vertically but cant transmit a video feed...
true
Bruh
Might as well ask why we can make cars that go 200mph but we can't make a bike chain stay on all the time
MOH Xbox Logic. Ok then I will ask “How comes we can get cars going 200mph but can’t make a bike chain stay on://“.
@@thegaminghobo4693 The point is that just because one thing of lower technology isn't flawless it doesn't immediately mean that something that is technologically superior is fake. If you were to think like that then as I joked a fast car isn't real because there are so many other lowly things that aren't as good as the car.
One word: priorities
tbh I thought it was a PR ploy so that if the landing is a failure, it is not immediately broadcasted to public and thus the hype of the mission does not go down at it's peak.
They only did that for the center core of the FH demo launch, where they did not say it crashed for a while to keep the hype up.
This is also the same company that posted an edit of all there fails
Yes I agree as whenever the landing fails they usually cut the live broadcast short and my suspicion is that they have a marketing team telling them to never admit failure live on air but you have to give them Kudos for them releasing footage of landings at a later date.
@@timg6850 I don't think that's true. Their company policy is not to be afraid of failure as stated by Elon many times. If they were afraid then they would have delayed the SN4 test to after DM2 to avoid the kind of headlines.
@@HawKster_ Have you you watched their live broadcasts? as soon as something goes awry they cut the broadcast. They may not be afraid of failure but they certainly make sure they are not broadcast unedited and its mainly thanks to NASA and Space enthusiasts we get updates on SpaceX problems.
you don't need a separate ship as a broadcaster, just a small module containing the antennae free floating on the water.
_Stage 1 rocket: _*_"YEEEEEEHAWWWW!!!! HEY THEIR LIL BUDDY!!!!.....I'M COMIN' IN HOT!!!"_*
_Droneship: _*_"fuck my life"_*
Who is here after the May 30 2020 live footage of the landing cut out?
Me.
Ok, I get why this can't be live. But they need to manage expectations better. First, have something stating that the connection is "Likely to drop". This is just like the radio silence period of capsules re-entering the atmosphere. Then show the footage as soon as able once re-connected. This should only be minutes ... like a long broadcast delay. People won't care if its not live, but you have 5-10 minutes max until people start tuning out.
Maybe they ignore completely the mockery of missing footage and image damage... to a private business, or the obvious explanation is the real one, there is no footage. People can accept a strong reason, but same reason about cost and bad engineering is not working anymore.
I was wondering this when the dragon crew rocket landed
@DONTRA HICKS ...exactly, Amen to that. All pseudoscience and brainwashing.
DONTRA HICKS and the earth is flat right and the sun is a drawing
This could have literally been a 3 second video “..cos vibrations”
Some people do need the full explanation. Some other people needed a lot more, apparently.
And youtubers need he watch time
Skelyboss you guys see the last starlink landing, it didn’t cut out, it was unreal !!
Thank you guys!!!!! You answered to my question!!!!
I feel like the easiest fix would be by having an antenna either on a buoy style setup or a smaller ship that either of which could be deployed off the drone ship just prior to touch down and dragged behind the drone ship. Then winched back on board when the rocket has landed
It doesn't make sense to spend the money on that when it's just a couple seconds of video that aren't even lost, just time-delayed.
Just drag a dingy behind it with the transmitter
kingjb82 you will have a similar problem with the small boat, except it will be going out all the time. The pitch and roll on small boats are usually too fast for the uplink antenna to track. Even when using stronger Servos, the flex of the fish and mount causes outages. An electronically steered array antenna could theoretically be used. $$$$
Then it wont be recording directly at the landing
@@IBHunter this. small boats wouldn't work. way to much movement on them. and putting a big enough ship there just ads cost and complexity. its not worth it for spacex since they have the footage anyway and i guess the control center gets to easily see it anyway ;)
Capricorn One. "Just the television transmissions".
Yes )
Well youtube just decided to recommend this to all of us now!
On Starlink-7 the booster landed on Just Read The Instructions. (The former west coast now a east coast droneship) Just Read The Instructions got major upgrades when it moved from the west to the east coast as opposed to Of Course I Still Love You (East coast droneship) which still has the old equipment. So JRTI has a better connection than OCISLY bc of those upgrades.
3:39 can’t they just show this camera angle?! Bruh...
this probably was captured with a drone which cant transmit live video
They only had that camera there for that landing because it was the first at sea landing. Now that they've perfected the landing, they don't need a secondary vessel.
@@MichaelMcClenaghan Seems like a bad excuse given how important this recent mission was... Which leads me to believe they wanted a contingency plan in the event of an explosion, i.e. control how they release the footage of the exploded booster.
@@TheMrVogue ruclips.net/video/bvim4rsNHkQ/видео.html bruh
@@felipechpte Those are missions that didn't ship human cargo. The idea is to minimize negative press. Notice how humble that video looks? Hell, I feel proud after watching it. If you show someone that video they're going to emotionally react to it positively. If you sit a random person down in front of a stream and it's their first time watching SpaceX because there's human cargo this time/America has launched astronauts into space after 8 years and they see a booster explode, they are going to have a negative reaction. So, you have a few options as SpaceX in the event a booster explodes during such an important mission, show pre recorded footage that pretends *this booster landing in particular* successfully landed, or, if it explodes, say you're having livestream problems and then after the pomp and circumstance regarding the successful shipment of human cargo has passed and the non space crowd has forgotten about it, release footage that allows you to control the psychological priming around the event by creating a video that celebrates your progress.
I'm not saying what they're doing is fake, I'm saying that if I needed to make sure my funding was secure, I'd do the above.
Final note, if we wanted the most authentic footage possible, we'd see a livestream that has 5-10 seconds of buffering for the replay. Or, they could have close to immediately replayed the footage after the rocket landed, such as within 5 minutes or so. Why they don't do that is... Suspicious. Why they don't tell people the stream could cut off and why is also suspicious.
It's a convenient excuse for allowing you to control the emotional response surrounding your mission.
They could just play recorded footage as a replay a few moments after the landing? Like instant replay sorta thing
Exactly.. Most so called live feeds all have a delay incase something inappropriate happens anyway.
I had the same thought.
On the recent starlink 7 launch you could see the landing live without interruption!
They do
@@andrewlabat9963 this isn't news or something. There is no post-processing delay in rocket launches.
That question occurred to me this morning. Well answered. Thanks👍
Well there goes my Conspiracy Theory!
What about placing the transmitter on a giant gimbal-like device to steady it?
Johnathan Sams that’s what I thought
Yeah man, that's so simple....wtf?!
what ever you thought of they probably already done it.. and it still failed apparently so they don't bother with it anymore..
Still, unnecessary costs as this has to be really giant and efficient gimbal for just couple of seconds of stream.
The transmitter IS already on a set of gimbals, that's how it aims.
No one seems truly appreciate the amplitude of the vibrations.
Gimbals provide aiming in 3 axes, but cannot provide the immense amount of damping that would be required to steady out the vibrations.
I like how at the last Starlink launch the camera didn't cut but it was night.
Easy to fool people that way, those Faker-Nots are currently living like rats in Kazakhstan. Remember, space smells like burnt pork? Thanks, Chris Hadfield. Little kids asks him, can you taste food in space? He says no we can't taste food in space. Also same astronotty, tells a kid his favourite food in space is super tasty. Right, spot a liar dot com.
@@christianboulay4722 wtf are you saying you weirdo🤣🤣🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️
@@christianboulay4722 ok...
@@christianboulay4722 lol okay
Hilariousness, at it's finest gentlemen? So, in what Universe do you believe you are living in, the Heliocentric assumption from Nicholas Copernicus, and everything rotates around with circular motion? Or, maybe even, perhaps. You've made a life changing choice, and thoroughly worship Johannes Kepler, and his theory of "Kepler's Planetary Motion", if you do you believe that Copernicus was a fraud and his theory was wrong. You also believe, that when Earth is flung out to it's furthest distance away from the Sun, it's actually Summer time in the Northern hemisphere. Completely, forgetting that the Earth rotates around its own axis? So, Gentlemen have e made up our minds yet, or do I stand by sipping my bourbon awaiting your response? Times, ticking away...like a cog in a fine Swiss timepiece.
Thank you for explaining this. It is not only frustrating that it cuts out, it doesn't help silence the flat earth brigade who think the footage is fake and edited. Unfortunately, they probably won't see or read any of this.
The excimer laser used in LASIK was developed in part by the Star Wars program of the 1980's. The technology that allowed a rocket to hit a rocket in space via tracking was integrated into the laser which is placed only a few inches above the eye. The problem is while the eye appears to be immobilized by a speculum, the involuntary saccadic movement of the eye is compensated by software that allows the laser to lock onto the eye and follow the slight movements to ensure the beam treats the right parts of the cornea. Why couldn't they just program the uplink to stay locked onto the satellite using the same technology that is decades old?