If they are all so good, why don't they track down some real missing people? If they can track down Ned Kelly's bones, how about giving them the case of the Beaumont kids??? Track them or their bones down
OK, I'm disappointed but not surprised. This is an Australian version of American Idol - that is to say the program is about who is the most popular (determined by texts and phone calls) is the winner -- the one who has the most charisma. I was hoping that science would play a larger part, such as in statistics -- who had the most accuracy -- not 'phone/text in now for who you think is the winner.' It's kind of disgusting that statistical science (objective) is ignored while the winner boils down to who is the most photogenic, (subjective, popular) etc. But it's a TV program. The only thing that matters in the media is how many eyeballs are watching at the moment.
It would have been interesting if they had people on the show who pretended to be psychic as well, to see how they did in comparison
His 'being convinced' is purely subjective He cannot allow himself to be convinced as that would destroy his persona as a 'skeptic'.
amanda is good she should help find that missing girl in mount druitt i wish
charmane is so amazing
If they are all so good, why don't they track down some real missing people? If they can track down Ned Kelly's bones, how about giving them the case of the Beaumont kids??? Track them or their bones down
OK, I'm disappointed but not surprised. This is an Australian version of American Idol - that is to say the program is about who is the most popular (determined by texts and phone calls) is the winner -- the one who has the most charisma. I was hoping that science would play a larger part, such as in statistics -- who had the most accuracy -- not 'phone/text in now for who you think is the winner.'
It's kind of disgusting that statistical science (objective) is ignored while the winner boils down to who is the most photogenic, (subjective, popular) etc.
But it's a TV program. The only thing that matters in the media is how many eyeballs are watching at the moment.
I agree! I do believe Charmaine may have been more accurate than the others, but I could be wrong.
The last challenge was in poor taste
Australia's biggest bullshitter would be a better title