I think you missed the earlier lessons in this series. Perhaps going through this playlist will help you get the answer you're looking for. ruclips.net/p/PLw2beuYPUpb3dk2j1oOBnqD40hc0Zy7NL&feature=shared
This analysis is wrong. You failed to consider the processing losses due to downtime, which amount to 48% at Op5. The critical operation, the operation that limits the throughput of the line is Op4 @a nominal 62 sec/pt. However, given the downtime losses, its net is 119 sec/pt., well below market demand/takt time of 100 secs. IF Op 4 is 100% labor, then doubling labor @Op4 may solve the problem. But, since it's assembly, some equipment is probably involved, meaning adding fixed assets/machinery, and upgrading QA to accommodate the extra throughput.
Thank you for your comment, Steve. If you were referring to processing losses as Change Over losses, you’re absolutely correct. I intentionally omitted that aspect in this series, fearing that it would make things too complicated. However, I’m currently working on a separate series dedicated to reducing changeover time. It’s called SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die). You can find more information about it here. ruclips.net/video/8A2T_JMA03M/видео.html Again, your comment brings me immense joy-it’s heartening to see people who question and seek beyond the status quo rather than merely accepting what’s taught to them.”
![ARGENTINA vs. BOLIVIA [6-0] | RESUMEN | ELIMINATORIAS SUDAMERICANAS | FECHA 10](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C3wPtKNbAOA/mqdefault.jpg)
Sir. This video is fabulous. I thank you for your contribution. Your explanation made my day amazing
How are you reducing the lead time in the future state? Please explain in detail with exact values
I think you missed the earlier lessons in this series. Perhaps going through this playlist will help you get the answer you're looking for.
ruclips.net/p/PLw2beuYPUpb3dk2j1oOBnqD40hc0Zy7NL&feature=shared
Sir Please make videos on Factory physics
This analysis is wrong. You failed to consider the processing losses due to downtime, which amount to 48% at Op5. The critical operation, the operation that limits the throughput of the line is Op4 @a nominal 62 sec/pt. However, given the downtime losses, its net is 119 sec/pt., well below market demand/takt time of 100 secs. IF Op 4 is 100% labor, then doubling labor @Op4 may solve the problem. But, since it's assembly, some equipment is probably involved, meaning adding fixed assets/machinery, and upgrading QA to accommodate the extra throughput.
Thank you for your comment, Steve.
If you were referring to processing losses as Change Over losses, you’re absolutely correct. I intentionally omitted that aspect in this series, fearing that it would make things too complicated. However, I’m currently working on a separate series dedicated to reducing changeover time. It’s called SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die). You can find more information about it here.
ruclips.net/video/8A2T_JMA03M/видео.html
Again, your comment brings me immense joy-it’s heartening to see people who question and seek beyond the status quo rather than merely accepting what’s taught to them.”