I think you missed the earlier lessons in this series. Perhaps going through this playlist will help you get the answer you're looking for. ruclips.net/p/PLw2beuYPUpb3dk2j1oOBnqD40hc0Zy7NL&feature=shared
This analysis is wrong. You failed to consider the processing losses due to downtime, which amount to 48% at Op5. The critical operation, the operation that limits the throughput of the line is Op4 @a nominal 62 sec/pt. However, given the downtime losses, its net is 119 sec/pt., well below market demand/takt time of 100 secs. IF Op 4 is 100% labor, then doubling labor @Op4 may solve the problem. But, since it's assembly, some equipment is probably involved, meaning adding fixed assets/machinery, and upgrading QA to accommodate the extra throughput.
Thank you for your comment, Steve. If you were referring to processing losses as Change Over losses, you’re absolutely correct. I intentionally omitted that aspect in this series, fearing that it would make things too complicated. However, I’m currently working on a separate series dedicated to reducing changeover time. It’s called SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die). You can find more information about it here. ruclips.net/video/8A2T_JMA03M/видео.html Again, your comment brings me immense joy-it’s heartening to see people who question and seek beyond the status quo rather than merely accepting what’s taught to them.”
How are you reducing the lead time in the future state? Please explain in detail with exact values
I think you missed the earlier lessons in this series. Perhaps going through this playlist will help you get the answer you're looking for.
ruclips.net/p/PLw2beuYPUpb3dk2j1oOBnqD40hc0Zy7NL&feature=shared
Sir. This video is fabulous. I thank you for your contribution. Your explanation made my day amazing
Sir Please make videos on Factory physics
This analysis is wrong. You failed to consider the processing losses due to downtime, which amount to 48% at Op5. The critical operation, the operation that limits the throughput of the line is Op4 @a nominal 62 sec/pt. However, given the downtime losses, its net is 119 sec/pt., well below market demand/takt time of 100 secs. IF Op 4 is 100% labor, then doubling labor @Op4 may solve the problem. But, since it's assembly, some equipment is probably involved, meaning adding fixed assets/machinery, and upgrading QA to accommodate the extra throughput.
Thank you for your comment, Steve.
If you were referring to processing losses as Change Over losses, you’re absolutely correct. I intentionally omitted that aspect in this series, fearing that it would make things too complicated. However, I’m currently working on a separate series dedicated to reducing changeover time. It’s called SMED (Single-Minute Exchange of Die). You can find more information about it here.
ruclips.net/video/8A2T_JMA03M/видео.html
Again, your comment brings me immense joy-it’s heartening to see people who question and seek beyond the status quo rather than merely accepting what’s taught to them.”