Wrong, because it is a grave sacrilege and offense against God to receive the Eucharist in the hand, which is why lay people were excommunicated for doing so throughout the history of the church
The Eucharistic revival will only be complete when we no longer touch His precious body with our hands but receive it by the priest's hands, in our mouth and on our knees, in due reverence to Jesus, King of all nations
@@zelinskymatt I'm torn on this issue, but usually receive on the tongue. Keep in mind, the Apostles at the Last Supper had already been made priests, so how they received could be viewed differently from how the laity receives.
I agree with you 100000 percent! I watched through the years how taking communion in the hand brought on casualness to the sacrament. Ive even witnessed people playing with it in thepews.
@@zelinskymatt oh so communion with the King of the Universe is like any regular dinner to you, so use your hands to touch what is the holiest of holies? How do you know that Jesus didn't place the unleavened bread directly in their mouth? The Bible doesn't specify, so we don't know. God requires us to respect and fear Him. Paul warned that those who received an unworthy communion had gotten sick or had died. Now that's proper food for thought.
I'm captivated by the clarity and depth of this content. A book with comparable insights was a pivotal moment in my journey. "A Life Unplugged: Reclaiming Reality in a Digital Age" by Theodore Blaze
The Holy Eucharist is Holy, regardless if one chooses to receive in their hands or on their tongue. And when we receive Our Lord Himself, our hearts will be contrite and in the state of grace. This is the Why, as the "how" matters not, unless Mother Church determines otherwise. Focus on the Interior, not the exterior. ❤🕊
The Eucharist is holy, therefore, we should treat it like it is holy. What you say is partly right, we should focus on the "why" and the interior, but the "how" comes from the "why" and the exterior represents the interior. These things are complementary not contradictory.
I pray this endeavor to be successful but know that until Catholics (especially American Catholics) began a true repentance for past sins and give the respect and adoration we all should have for the Holy Eucharist
Jesus' prayer for unity the night before He was killed, "That they may be one..." I read some of the comments here that lack charity towards fellow Catholics and it saddens me. Let us be at peace with one another and not resort to saying 'my way is the best way'. How will we ever be one? The enemy is always at work. We have a chance to have a Eucharistic Revival but most of the comments don't want a revival, they want what used to be. Sad.
"what used to be"-- it wouldnt be revival if it wasnt alive before. Just pointing that out. I agree that Catholics should be united (obviously), but it seems that you misunderstand the position of traditional Catholics. It is not "my way is the best way" but rather, "the reverent way is the best way". And things like genuflecting, receiving on tongue, and celebrating in Latin are ways of making the mass more reverent. I do not want to be that angry SSPX guy, but it is a sad truth that much the Mass' reverence was lost in the Novus Ordo. What some do not know is that there are reverent NO masses as well as irreverent ones. But the fact that we have to distinguish between a rev. NO mass and an irrev. NO mass says something, does it not?
Thank you for sharing. While Jesus Christ is our only hope in this life often fraught with woe, this Eucharistic Revival and other societal movements are leading to only one outcome - a question between God's seventh day sabbath and the papacy's Sunday; and all of us will make at that time, when Sunday observance is mandated by law, an irrevocable choice for eternal life or the second death (Exodus 20, Daniel 7, John 14, Revelation 7, 13-22).
It is offensive to see the Body of Christ placed in unconsecrated hands. Pray for a return of the sacredness of receiving His Sacred Body, in this video and in our world.🕊🙏🏼
@@monicaapaezguevara6769Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
Brante Pitre has an awesome scriptural proof of the true pressence with the Jewish forshaddowing the Bread of the Pressence, the Manna, the Passover Lamb... for our Bible believing brothers and sisters! I believe it would revert lots of people. The New Testament bread is not less than the Old Testament... living bread from Heaven!
Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
Hi Sylvia! Thank you for your question. Yes, resources are available in Spanish. Here is a link to this video in Spanish (ruclips.net/video/i44289hX3Rs/видео.html), and additional information is available at www.avivamientoeucarístico.org. Thank you for your willingness to share these resources! God bless you!
If the Church were really interested in increasing belief in and devotion to the Eucharist, is would open its eyes and think a little outside its own box: get rid of lay ministers, give Communion kneeling down on the tongue, restore a meaningful Communion fast, and improve church music. But the Church so often discourages what it claims to want.
Dear USCCB, why not save all the money on programming and just spend it on reinstalling communion rails, and asking for people to receive kneeling on tongue (if health of person allows). Help parishioners realize that this isn’t ordinary food, but extraordinary food that requires personal examination before receiving. I know the church permits reception by hand, but we all know some of these hosts end up at black masses. This seems like a simple solutions to stop hurting our Lord.
Why can’t we just all promote the Eucharistic revival instead of complaining and gossiping on this channel. I’m a pretty recent convert and comments like this is a discouragement. Where’s the unity and the joy? I don’t see it . SMH 😱
Well I mean I wouldn't be here if I wasn't forced by a church assignment because I don't personally believe it matters whether tongue or hand take the Eucharist, it's holy. People are getting mad at people because they believe that tongues shouldn't be forced, but sanitary reasons are my top concern, as my following copy/paste message details. Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
Maybe start with actually adhering to Sacrosanctum Concilium and allowing priests to face ad orientem and use SOME Latin during Mass. There is no doctrinal mandate to face the people for Mass. Mandate sacred music and chant, not terrible post-Vatican II contemporary garbage. Then kindly ask the congregation to dress appropriately for Mass.
Pauluse esimene kiri korintlastele 8:5 Jah, kui olekski nõndanimetatud jumalaid, olgu taevas või maa peal, nõnda nagu inimeste meelest on jumalaid palju ja isandaid palju,
6 siis meie jaoks on ometi ainult üks Jumal, Isa, kellest on kõik asjad, ja meie tema juurde teel, ning üks Issand, Jeesus Kristus, kelle läbi on kõik, ja ka meie tema läbi. Pauluse teine kiri korintlastele 13:4 Sest kuigi ta löödi risti nõtruses, ometi elab ta Jumala väest. Nii oleme meiegi nõdrad temas, kuid elame koos temaga Jumala väest teie jaoks. 5 Katsuge iseendid läbi, kas te olete usus! Pange end proovile! Või te ei tunne endast, et Jeesus Kristus on teie sees? Kui ei, siis te olete ju kõlbmatud! 6 Aga ma loodan, et te tunnetate, et meie ei ole kõlbmatud. 7 Me palume Jumalat, et teie ei teeks mingit kurja - mitte et meie seeläbi paistaksime kõlblikena, vaid me tahame, et teie teeksite head, ehkki meie oleksime nagu kõlbmatud. 8 Sest me ei suuda midagi tõe vastu, vaid üksnes tõe poolt.
This is a phased revival, with the dioceses starting first and then moving into each parish. Let us pray that it is successful and do what each of us can to truly bring Jesus into the minds, hearts and souls of ourselves and neighbors!
@@zelinskymatt the solution is to have everyone be imbued with the Holy Spirit because that’s what lead to the Pentecost and any other revival. Persistent theological programs wont accomplish revivals
@@ThePassengerPreacher I am a little confused, the sacrament of confirmation is the pouring down of the Holy Spirit on recipients like at pentecost! We all have the same Holy Spirit the apostles received, we just don't embrace it like them...
@@dzwoodcraft4337 How do you know the recipients have received the Holy Spirit during the sacrament of confirmation? I know its taught to us that way, but does that mean its really happening? How can we receive the the Holy Spirit if the priest doesn’t commune wit the Holy Spirit himself??
Said below, but we could use a Traditional Latin Mass Revival which would solve issues greater than irreverence of the Eucharist.
If I be lifted up, I will draw all men unto me.
John 12:32
Beautiful words
I agree! Love God, love the Eucharist. But, no Comunion on the hand for me. God bless you!
It matters, not weather you receive the precious body of Jesus on the tongue or in hand, but what is in your mind and your heart at the time.
Wrong, because it is a grave sacrilege and offense against God to receive the Eucharist in the hand, which is why lay people were excommunicated for doing so throughout the history of the church
The Eucharistic revival will only be complete when we no longer touch His precious body with our hands but receive it by the priest's hands, in our mouth and on our knees, in due reverence to Jesus, King of all nations
TLM revival is needed. Back to basics.
Reverence is needed, but Jesus didn't spoon feed the Apostles at the Last Supper, humans eat with their hands naturally as God created us to
@@zelinskymatt I'm torn on this issue, but usually receive on the tongue. Keep in mind, the Apostles at the Last Supper had already been made priests, so how they received could be viewed differently from how the laity receives.
I agree with you 100000 percent! I watched through the years how taking communion in the hand brought on casualness to the sacrament. Ive even witnessed people playing with it in thepews.
@@zelinskymatt oh so communion with the King of the Universe is like any regular dinner to you, so use your hands to touch what is the holiest of holies? How do you know that Jesus didn't place the unleavened bread directly in their mouth? The Bible doesn't specify, so we don't know. God requires us to respect and fear Him. Paul warned that those who received an unworthy communion had gotten sick or had died. Now that's proper food for thought.
God bless the Eucharistic Revival
Accept Jesus Christ…experience a new transformation that you will physically feel and reap the fruits that will be bestowed upon your soul! 🙏
Beautiful, thank you for sharing this 🙏❤
Jesus i need you❤
I'm captivated by the clarity and depth of this content. A book with comparable insights was a pivotal moment in my journey. "A Life Unplugged: Reclaiming Reality in a Digital Age" by Theodore Blaze
The priesthood is a beautiful gift!
The Holy Eucharist is Holy, regardless if one chooses to receive in their hands or on their tongue. And when we receive Our Lord Himself, our hearts will be contrite and in the state of grace. This is the Why, as the "how" matters not, unless Mother Church determines otherwise. Focus on the Interior, not the exterior. ❤🕊
The Eucharist is holy, therefore, we should treat it like it is holy. What you say is partly right, we should focus on the "why" and the interior, but the "how" comes from the "why" and the exterior represents the interior. These things are complementary not contradictory.
God bless you and God be with you.
Beautiful video. God bless 🙂
Amen.🔘
AND THE WHOLE WORLD WONDERED AFTER THE BEAST WHO DEADLY WOUND WAS HEALED
Praise God. Thanks for sharing this beautiful portion of the Eucharistic Revival. We can share this in the Parish
I pray this endeavor to be successful but know that until Catholics (especially American Catholics) began a true repentance for past sins and give the respect and adoration we all should have for the Holy Eucharist
Jesus' prayer for unity the night before He was killed, "That they may be one..." I read some of the comments here that lack charity towards fellow Catholics and it saddens me. Let us be at peace with one another and not resort to saying 'my way is the best way'. How will we ever be one? The enemy is always at work. We have a chance to have a Eucharistic Revival but most of the comments don't want a revival, they want what used to be. Sad.
"what used to be"-- it wouldnt be revival if it wasnt alive before. Just pointing that out.
I agree that Catholics should be united (obviously), but it seems that you misunderstand the position of traditional Catholics. It is not "my way is the best way" but rather, "the reverent way is the best way". And things like genuflecting, receiving on tongue, and celebrating in Latin are ways of making the mass more reverent.
I do not want to be that angry SSPX guy, but it is a sad truth that much the Mass' reverence was lost in the Novus Ordo. What some do not know is that there are reverent NO masses as well as irreverent ones. But the fact that we have to distinguish between a rev. NO mass and an irrev. NO mass says something, does it not?
Thank you for sharing. While Jesus Christ is our only hope in this life often fraught with woe, this Eucharistic Revival and other societal movements are leading to only one outcome - a question between God's seventh day sabbath and the papacy's Sunday; and all of us will make at that time, when Sunday observance is mandated by law, an irrevocable choice for eternal life or the second death (Exodus 20, Daniel 7, John 14, Revelation 7, 13-22).
It is offensive to see the Body of Christ placed in unconsecrated hands. Pray for a return of the sacredness of receiving His Sacred Body, in this video and in our world.🕊🙏🏼
My tongue sins as often as my hands…
Why add the hand too? It makes sense then to skip the hand and place it on the tongue
Thank you very much Pam
@@monicaapaezguevara6769Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
Oh my goodness! I have received communion in my hands. I won't anymore.
Brante Pitre has an awesome scriptural proof of the true pressence with the Jewish forshaddowing the Bread of the Pressence, the Manna, the Passover Lamb... for our Bible believing brothers and sisters! I believe it would revert lots of people. The New Testament bread is not less than the Old Testament... living bread from Heaven!
❤️🔥
"We must take the Lord upon one knee and on the tongue out of respect and humility"
Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
You go Jesus!
Amen!
Hi are there resources in spanish about it? Thank you, I'll love to share this with the spanish speaker community.
Hi Sylvia! Thank you for your question. Yes, resources are available in Spanish. Here is a link to this video in Spanish (ruclips.net/video/i44289hX3Rs/видео.html), and additional information is available at www.avivamientoeucarístico.org. Thank you for your willingness to share these resources! God bless you!
I have been trying to get in touch with the National Eucharistic Revival (via their website) for weeks, does anyone know to reach them?
Only one brief mention of the chalice?
If the Church were really interested in increasing belief in and devotion to the Eucharist, is would open its eyes and think a little outside its own box: get rid of lay ministers, give Communion kneeling down on the tongue, restore a meaningful Communion fast, and improve church music. But the Church so often discourages what it claims to want.
Dear USCCB, why not save all the money on programming and just spend it on reinstalling communion rails, and asking for people to receive kneeling on tongue (if health of person allows). Help parishioners realize that this isn’t ordinary food, but extraordinary food that requires personal examination before receiving. I know the church permits reception by hand, but we all know some of these hosts end up at black masses. This seems like a simple solutions to stop hurting our Lord.
Why can’t we just all promote the Eucharistic revival instead of complaining and gossiping on this channel. I’m a pretty recent convert and comments like this is a discouragement. Where’s the unity and the joy? I don’t see it . SMH 😱
Well I mean I wouldn't be here if I wasn't forced by a church assignment because I don't personally believe it matters whether tongue or hand take the Eucharist, it's holy. People are getting mad at people because they believe that tongues shouldn't be forced, but sanitary reasons are my top concern, as my following copy/paste message details.
Sanitary reasons. It would only take one person to be sick and the father accidently touched their tongue, to get their saliva into every other Eucharist and get everybody in the church sick.
Maybe start with actually adhering to Sacrosanctum Concilium and allowing priests to face ad orientem and use SOME Latin during Mass. There is no doctrinal mandate to face the people for Mass. Mandate sacred music and chant, not terrible post-Vatican II contemporary garbage. Then kindly ask the congregation to dress appropriately for Mass.
Pauluse esimene kiri korintlastele 8:5
Jah, kui olekski nõndanimetatud jumalaid, olgu taevas või
maa peal, nõnda nagu inimeste meelest on jumalaid palju ja isandaid
palju,
6 siis meie jaoks on ometi ainult üks Jumal, Isa,
kellest on kõik asjad, ja meie tema juurde teel,
ning üks Issand, Jeesus Kristus,
kelle läbi on kõik, ja ka meie tema läbi.
Pauluse teine kiri korintlastele 13:4 Sest kuigi ta löödi risti nõtruses, ometi elab ta Jumala
väest. Nii oleme meiegi nõdrad temas, kuid elame koos temaga
Jumala väest teie jaoks.
5 Katsuge iseendid läbi, kas te olete usus! Pange end
proovile! Või te ei tunne endast, et Jeesus Kristus on
teie sees? Kui ei, siis te olete ju kõlbmatud!
6 Aga ma loodan, et te tunnetate, et meie ei ole
kõlbmatud.
7 Me palume Jumalat, et teie ei teeks mingit kurja -
mitte et meie seeläbi paistaksime kõlblikena, vaid me tahame, et teie
teeksite head, ehkki meie oleksime nagu kõlbmatud.
8 Sest me ei suuda midagi tõe vastu, vaid üksnes tõe poolt.
If you actually believed in the real presence, you wouldn't receive the eucharist on the hand
We need to process the blessed sacrament through Walt Disney World and many other places at least once a year to bring real Eucharistic revival.
They never film these things in the ugly parishes we all know exist everywhere.
Nothing will be revived until the Eucharist is no longer recieved on the hands.
Prediction: this will do very little to instill deeper belief and adoration for the Eucharist and will just be a tremendous waste of money and time.
What's your solution?
This is a phased revival, with the dioceses starting first and then moving into each parish. Let us pray that it is successful and do what each of us can to truly bring Jesus into the minds, hearts and souls of ourselves and neighbors!
@@zelinskymatt the solution is to have everyone be imbued with the Holy Spirit because that’s what lead to the Pentecost and any other revival. Persistent theological programs wont accomplish revivals
@@ThePassengerPreacher I am a little confused, the sacrament of confirmation is the pouring down of the Holy Spirit on recipients like at pentecost! We all have the same Holy Spirit the apostles received, we just don't embrace it like them...
@@dzwoodcraft4337 How do you know the recipients have received the Holy Spirit during the sacrament of confirmation? I know its taught to us that way, but does that mean its really happening? How can we receive the the Holy Spirit if the priest doesn’t commune wit the Holy Spirit himself??