Amazing video! I love the photos that you capture! I recently tried out a canon 100-400 mk ii lens with the canon eos 7d mk ii and they are great but I was slightly concerned about the lens's zoom and I am now considering getting a lens with up to a 500 or even 600mm zoom. Do you think it's worth getting a heavier lens?
Yes ofcourse. Nothing great comes out of convenience, or maybe it does. But the inconvenience of porting a longer but heavier had more advantages than disadvantages. I like lenses with a widest aperture of 5.6 or even wider. 500/600mm 6.3 doesn't work for me as they are useless in low light... Thanks for watching and commenting on my video, I appreciate it 😁
I have not used mirrorless cameras extensively. The top-of-the-line Nikon, and Canon are good. If the Z9 is giving issues with focusing etc. update the firmware. "Entry-level" mirrorless cameras, costing over two and a half times the price of what a new Nikon D500 did, fall short for wildlife. Many of them don't even have a dedicated button to change the ISO. Cameras such as the D500, 7DM2, or even the D7500 etc. and ofcourse cameras such as the 1DX II, D5 etc. will deliver better results as compared to the entry-level mirrorless range. The advantages of mirrorless cameras are better image quality at higher ISO values, and live histogram through the viewfinder.
@@TheOpenImage Even I am not so inclined towards mirror less, as of now I am using Nikon D500 but want to upgrade to full frame and won’t mind switching to Canon, please suggest
Amazing video! I love the photos that you capture! I recently tried out a canon 100-400 mk ii lens with the canon eos 7d mk ii and they are great but I was slightly concerned about the lens's zoom and I am now considering getting a lens with up to a 500 or even 600mm zoom. Do you think it's worth getting a heavier lens?
Yes ofcourse. Nothing great comes out of convenience, or maybe it does. But the inconvenience of porting a longer but heavier had more advantages than disadvantages.
I like lenses with a widest aperture of 5.6 or even wider. 500/600mm 6.3 doesn't work for me as they are useless in low light...
Thanks for watching and commenting on my video, I appreciate it 😁
Cracking photos mate.
Thanks for watching 😊
Love to have your opinion about mirror less camera vs dslr camera for wild life photography and which brand would you like to suggest for the same
I have not used mirrorless cameras extensively. The top-of-the-line Nikon, and Canon are good. If the Z9 is giving issues with focusing etc. update the firmware.
"Entry-level" mirrorless cameras, costing over two and a half times the price of what a new Nikon D500 did, fall short for wildlife. Many of them don't even have a dedicated button to change the ISO. Cameras such as the D500, 7DM2, or even the D7500 etc. and ofcourse cameras such as the 1DX II, D5 etc. will deliver better results as compared to the entry-level mirrorless range.
The advantages of mirrorless cameras are better image quality at higher ISO values, and live histogram through the viewfinder.
@@TheOpenImage Even I am not so inclined towards mirror less, as of now I am using Nikon D500 but want to upgrade to full frame and won’t mind switching to Canon, please suggest
Yes, you can consider the Canon 1Dx II or Nikon D6 or D5
PS: the 1Dx II is not full frame, it's 1.3x
@@TheOpenImage Thank you for your valuable suggestion