Thanks! Right now its structural things i could comment on but since its not a engineering software i have not much to work with, though ill definitely try to implement the engineering part more!
Have you heard of a the master of engineering called “the smiler” it is in the uk & has 14 inversions would recommend as it holds the world record for the most inversions!
Should either have an airplaned theme roller coaster or a wooden one on the little exotic island you were working on, an airplane for that survival island vibe.
This bnm inverter could be just that Honnestly its way to to slow and to lame for a thrillcoaster of any ckind but converted to a flying coaster you could theme it with rocks and a cave a few huge trees that you try to navigate whule crashlanding Maybe add some height in the first part for extra speed at the mid brake You might even tell part ofcthe story in the cue
Incredible video, 40 mins passed by so quickly. Please keep it up. Quick q, for the horizontal supports underground, would cuboid beams be sturdier than the cylindrical ones?
that’s a really good question! So, in theory, say that you want to compare beams of around the same size, then squared beams would be the best decision between the two. Now, squared beams, due to the geometry, at much more expensive to produce and therefore, to buy. In theory, in real structures, not even squared beams are used in metallic structures, but a series of normalised sections are used, for example, an IPE section (which is basically having a double T, one of them being upside down, or a mayus “i” with those horizontal stripes, if you will). They require the use of less steel for the same effect due to their geometry, but again, their cost goes a bit up, and they’re used to support big constant loads, so they’re not that sturdy when it comes to fatigue (fatigue is applying a force then getting rid of it and doing this process so on, for example, when you’re taking a clip and bend it in different directions you’re testing the fatigue capacities of the material). A roller coaster does that cause the loads when a train is going through the track and when its the track by itself is very different, so fatigue comes into play. Also, all this is taken into account when we’re talking about static forces, but since the trains are moving, forces are dinamic, so there could be a situation where the squared section would not be beneficial cause the forces are applied in a non favourable direction of the support, which doesn’t happen in the cylindrical one because of its radial symmetry. So, to sum up. Squared supports are better, but more expensive to create; cylindrical ones are cheaper, but less sturdier, so you gotta see what results cheaper for your forces, and find the threshold for when the squared support is more viable than the other one. Pretty long explanation but i hope you got at least the main idea, im not that good at explaining deep engineering in english since i haven’t studied it in that language, but i hope i explained myself well!!!! 😊
@@PrengineBudoz oh wow, so a lot of thought went into choosing the cylindrical ones. Appreciate the explanation, I understood it all your English is not bad at all. Really interesting, part of me wonders whether I could have done engineering instead
@@SMCoasters97 I honestly would not have chosen anything else to be honest, I'm happy with my decision, but if you're looking to focus only on rollercoasters civil engineering (or any engineering degree) is not your place. Roller coasters are not even mentioned in the career. In civil engineering ofr example, me and my classmates are aware that we are able to build them cause its basically mixing rails (which we study in railroad lectures) with dynamic structures, which we also study, but nothing mixing both and naming it "rollercoaster". Civil engineering is a very broad engineering; basically everything you see on a daily basis has civil engineering in it, so we don't go in deep in every civil engineer variations there could be you know? But yeah, there's very interesting lectures in there
@@PrengineBudoz I remember when I was younger I did realise this too, although I did find the real aspects of civil engineering interesting though. Maybe in another life
I do! Really simple mods really, I use the Realism V3 Overhaul mod and several ACSE mods! If you want to download any mods this video (ruclips.net/video/OgyIcy0O0MQ/видео.html) gives a really straightforward and useful tutorial on how to download and install them, it's the tutorial I followed!
a bit of an eye catching title doesn't hurt anyone, does it? hahaha yeak i know what you mean, im open to suggestions if you got any other eye catching idea. Thanks for the comment!
@@PrengineBudoz tru, you can do what you wonna do.....i will follow you i looooove planet coaster i have played since start and stil do and have over 500 hours into the game. And the title thing i would be you just leave the engineer thing out of it, its eye catching enough or maybe use the engineer thing in a diffrent way
@@its_jj_maia exactly my point being an engineer you would think one would like the challenge.. and you can theme just as good on No limits just have to know what your doing
No limits would be great if I only wanted to focus in the roller coasters themselves, but not even that program/game would be enough for me to have enough content to focus on. There is no way to do structural, wear and tear, aerodynamics foundation or any type of calculations in NoLimits because i lack a lot of info needed for it to be a realistic coaster in terms of foundations etc. At the end of the day it's not a real roller coaster designing software, it's just a game to see the product. I do have NoLimits and play with it and FVD sometimes, but I'm specialising in both structural engineering and transport and land engineering. Planet coaster is the game that lets me have a bit of both without going in too deep in neither of them (at the end of the day I'm playing the game trying to apply what I learnt to a game that is not designed for engineering purposes) which i don't want to do because if i did then this would be a boring series of me doing math and breaking my head figuring out how to make the rollercoaster stable, and I honestly have enough with my classes lmao. So yeah, to sum up, basically i use PlanCo because it has people in it and money, land and guest management in it :)
You may have just got me back into Planet Coaster again! Also, don't put yourself down your english is spot on :) Can't wait for more!
Thank you! Really excited to get the hango of youtube and do a bit more of technical videos maybe? idk i'll just go with the flow i guess.
@@PrengineBudozwait is english not your first language? If so I couldn’t even tell the difference
Really enjoying all the background insider information! Can’t wait to watch my way through the series
This stuff is bloody impressive! Love it.
Thanks mate!
i really love your builds you very creative keep doing what chu do
I’m looking forward to this series big time! 😂
Thank you! Definitely didn't expect it to have such an impressive success (at least for a new channel its impressive to me lol)
i just saw the intro im already loving you so new sub!🎉 congrats with 500subs!
omg thank you mate!!
Yo this video is fire. Have fun with this series because I'll be trying to watch it everytime you upload to this series
same
Thank you so much! I appreciate it!
The “dive love” should be a new elment! 💯💯💯 lol sorry but the coaster is amazing! You just got a new sub
Thanks for the support!
I liked the engineerimg materials commentary at the end. Was interesting
Thanks! Right now its structural things i could comment on but since its not a engineering software i have not much to work with, though ill definitely try to implement the engineering part more!
Very cool 😊
I hope you go viral
Nuevo seguidor desde Colombia. Nice work this is awesome.
Gracias amigo!!!
Luv it
Your English is good don't put yourself down
Have you heard of a the master of engineering called “the smiler” it is in the uk & has 14 inversions would recommend as it holds the world record for the most inversions!
I have heard of it! Haven't ridden it though but i really would love to. Really seems like a really intricate engineering marvel.
Should either have an airplaned theme roller coaster or a wooden one on the little exotic island you were working on, an airplane for that survival island vibe.
Really good idea! Idk if I got any space for it though, but ill definitely consider it!
This bnm inverter could be just that
Honnestly its way to to slow and to lame for a thrillcoaster of any ckind but converted to a flying coaster you could theme it with rocks and
a cave a few huge trees that you try to navigate whule crashlanding
Maybe add some height in the first part for extra speed at the mid brake
You might even tell part ofcthe story in the cue
@@edwinv.u1674 Sounds good! Maybe after some time it would be cool to refurbish it! Thanks fo rthe input.
Incredible video, 40 mins passed by so quickly. Please keep it up.
Quick q, for the horizontal supports underground, would cuboid beams be sturdier than the cylindrical ones?
that’s a really good question! So, in theory, say that you want to compare beams of around the same size, then squared beams would be the best decision between the two. Now, squared beams, due to the geometry, at much more expensive to produce and therefore, to buy. In theory, in real structures, not even squared beams are used in metallic structures, but a series of normalised sections are used, for example, an IPE section (which is basically having a double T, one of them being upside down, or a mayus “i” with those horizontal stripes, if you will). They require the use of less steel for the same effect due to their geometry, but again, their cost goes a bit up, and they’re used to support big constant loads, so they’re not that sturdy when it comes to fatigue (fatigue is applying a force then getting rid of it and doing this process so on, for example, when you’re taking a clip and bend it in different directions you’re testing the fatigue capacities of the material). A roller coaster does that cause the loads when a train is going through the track and when its the track by itself is very different, so fatigue comes into play. Also, all this is taken into account when we’re talking about static forces, but since the trains are moving, forces are dinamic, so there could be a situation where the squared section would not be beneficial cause the forces are applied in a non favourable direction of the support, which doesn’t happen in the cylindrical one because of its radial symmetry. So, to sum up. Squared supports are better, but more expensive to create; cylindrical ones are cheaper, but less sturdier, so you gotta see what results cheaper for your forces, and find the threshold for when the squared support is more viable than the other one. Pretty long explanation but i hope you got at least the main idea, im not that good at explaining deep engineering in english since i haven’t studied it in that language, but i hope i explained myself well!!!! 😊
@@PrengineBudoz oh wow, so a lot of thought went into choosing the cylindrical ones. Appreciate the explanation, I understood it all your English is not bad at all. Really interesting, part of me wonders whether I could have done engineering instead
@@SMCoasters97 I honestly would not have chosen anything else to be honest, I'm happy with my decision, but if you're looking to focus only on rollercoasters civil engineering (or any engineering degree) is not your place. Roller coasters are not even mentioned in the career. In civil engineering ofr example, me and my classmates are aware that we are able to build them cause its basically mixing rails (which we study in railroad lectures) with dynamic structures, which we also study, but nothing mixing both and naming it "rollercoaster". Civil engineering is a very broad engineering; basically everything you see on a daily basis has civil engineering in it, so we don't go in deep in every civil engineer variations there could be you know? But yeah, there's very interesting lectures in there
@@PrengineBudoz I remember when I was younger I did realise this too, although I did find the real aspects of civil engineering interesting though. Maybe in another life
I think i should buy planet coaster.
looks like a fun coaster! could you upload a pov/give the stats?
POV will be in the next episode! I'll upload the stats as soon as i can get to play again with planco, since I'm pretty busy now
I like your voice
When will you post part 2 because I will be waiting
I hope it won't take much longer ;)
99th liked here!
do you use any mods?
I do! Really simple mods really, I use the Realism V3 Overhaul mod and several ACSE mods! If you want to download any mods this video (ruclips.net/video/OgyIcy0O0MQ/видео.html) gives a really straightforward and useful tutorial on how to download and install them, it's the tutorial I followed!
Tbh my friend you are good at the game but keep that i am a engineer and thats why i di this thing out of the titles and we are good
a bit of an eye catching title doesn't hurt anyone, does it? hahaha yeak i know what you mean, im open to suggestions if you got any other eye catching idea. Thanks for the comment!
@@PrengineBudoz tru, you can do what you wonna do.....i will follow you i looooove planet coaster i have played since start and stil do and have over 500 hours into the game. And the title thing i would be you just leave the engineer thing out of it, its eye catching enough or maybe use the engineer thing in a diffrent way
Why not play no limits being a real life engineer 🥱🤔🤔
Cause u can’t really make good theming on nolimits. Yes the coasters are a lot smoother but theming them is a lot harder
@@its_jj_maia exactly my point being an engineer you would think one would like the challenge.. and you can theme just as good on No limits just have to know what your doing
No limits would be great if I only wanted to focus in the roller coasters themselves, but not even that program/game would be enough for me to have enough content to focus on. There is no way to do structural, wear and tear, aerodynamics foundation or any type of calculations in NoLimits because i lack a lot of info needed for it to be a realistic coaster in terms of foundations etc. At the end of the day it's not a real roller coaster designing software, it's just a game to see the product. I do have NoLimits and play with it and FVD sometimes, but I'm specialising in both structural engineering and transport and land engineering. Planet coaster is the game that lets me have a bit of both without going in too deep in neither of them (at the end of the day I'm playing the game trying to apply what I learnt to a game that is not designed for engineering purposes) which i don't want to do because if i did then this would be a boring series of me doing math and breaking my head figuring out how to make the rollercoaster stable, and I honestly have enough with my classes lmao.
So yeah, to sum up, basically i use PlanCo because it has people in it and money, land and guest management in it :)