Ironically, we now look at the definitions in a much more extroverted way (we look at quantifiable behavior instead of the cognition behind it, and label extroversion as social behavior, and introversion as lack thereof). The material world belongs to the extroverts, as Jung himself once said, and it will bend the ideas generated by introverts, as Jung was, to its needs
@@marcodallolio9746 Yeah I actually had that thought as well, we look at everything from the outside and rarely care about the inner nature of things and even beings... And even if we do, it is very difficult to talk about it, just as Jung said. It feels like there is a more and more crystalized model of the material world and the fluid nature of the inner world is harder and harder to grasp from that model. I wonder if this is going to change with the world becoming more and more complex and weird, especially with AI, neural implants, simulations... at some point things might flip and you might no longer be able to ignore the inner worlds if you want to stay sane...
@@vincnt0169 we are already at that point I'm afraid. In the west the subject is dead, and has been for a while. We think of ourselves as machines programmed by evolution to maximize utility, no wonder everyone is depressed. We already need to break from that crystallized model of reality and re-enter subjectivity to have any hope of individual and collective sanity
beautiful example of when you go to the root of a word you find the true meaning. The way he phrased it, more influenced by the external and more influenced by the internal, almost suggests the opposite of how we interpret these words today.
Freud was obsessed with sex I grant you that point. But the modern psychology has moved away from that sex stuff. Even back in Freud's time, Freud was heavily criticized for limiting everything to sex. Jung, Adler to name a few were Freud's coworkers and his closest friends but Freud ended his ties with because these guys criticized Freud's view on sex
Modern psychology is not based on freuds stuff either ig. Don't know of it's true but modern psychology is a bit more material/empirical focused not exactly like jungian analysis ways
I think Freud got it right but then just went on writing a lot of rubbish when drunk. 😂 I like women. My mother was attractive and kind. My workmate likes men, and hated his alcoholic , abominable mother.
People also think introvert means shy or quiet. It doesn't. It refers to those who find solitude energizing. You can be a very outgoing introvert, or a shy extrovert who finds socialising and people energizing.
According to Jordan Peterson's online personality test, I am more introverted than 90 people, in a room with 100 people. (I think that's pretty close to being a complete introvert. 😂)
Really good annotations, well done!
His original definition of extrovert and introvert makes much more sense than what is now understood.
Ironically, we now look at the definitions in a much more extroverted way (we look at quantifiable behavior instead of the cognition behind it, and label extroversion as social behavior, and introversion as lack thereof).
The material world belongs to the extroverts, as Jung himself once said, and it will bend the ideas generated by introverts, as Jung was, to its needs
@@marcodallolio9746 Yeah I actually had that thought as well, we look at everything from the outside and rarely care about the inner nature of things and even beings...
And even if we do, it is very difficult to talk about it, just as Jung said.
It feels like there is a more and more crystalized model of the material world and the fluid nature of the inner world is harder and harder to grasp from that model.
I wonder if this is going to change with the world becoming more and more complex and weird, especially with AI, neural implants, simulations... at some point things might flip and you might no longer be able to ignore the inner worlds if you want to stay sane...
@@vincnt0169 we are already at that point I'm afraid. In the west the subject is dead, and has been for a while. We think of ourselves as machines programmed by evolution to maximize utility, no wonder everyone is depressed. We already need to break from that crystallized model of reality and re-enter subjectivity to have any hope of individual and collective sanity
@@marcodallolio9746 well, let's try to get it done then, i'm still optimistic :)
@@vincnt0169 oh I'm fully confident that change will come. Not for free though
beautiful example of when you go to the root of a word you find the true meaning. The way he phrased it, more influenced by the external and more influenced by the internal, almost suggests the opposite of how we interpret these words today.
Psychology took a hard wrong turn when they went with Freud's weird obsession with everyone's sex lives.
And we wonder why everyone's going mental.
Freud was obsessed with sex I grant you that point. But the modern psychology has moved away from that sex stuff. Even back in Freud's time, Freud was heavily criticized for limiting everything to sex. Jung, Adler to name a few were Freud's coworkers and his closest friends but Freud ended his ties with because these guys criticized Freud's view on sex
Jung is the complete opposite of Freud, despite being one of his “colleagues”. Read him, by far the best psychologist.
This is Jung
Modern psychology is not based on freuds stuff either ig. Don't know of it's true but modern psychology is a bit more material/empirical focused not exactly like jungian analysis ways
I think Freud got it right but then just went on writing a lot of rubbish when drunk. 😂
I like women. My mother was attractive and kind.
My workmate likes men, and hated his alcoholic , abominable mother.
You know you have successfully individuated when you are not bothered by bad hair day anymore 🤭
Haha😂
Good point 😂
You knew you had successfully died when you commented this
This man was a brilliant mine
Am glad when he was around
There were no smart phones
He was ahead of everymine
ahead of his time .
is this a poem?
That needed to be said
저는 인간과 다른 생태계속 생명체들은 별과 행성의 유기체버전이라고 생각해요.
I agree!
Alastair Crowley also claimed that all men and women are really stars. 🌟✨
He says 'such a man would be in a lunatic asylum', not 'would be a unico tipo' ! :) :D
I would like to have inner peace ........
i appreciate the annotation
I am an extrovert yet a strong (day) dreamer!
A certain way... at certain times; nothing set in cement there, as we go with the flow of life💃
We are ambiverts ♠️
Extravert in jung works means objective and introvert means subjective. Its not the actual social extroversion/introversion
In pretty sure he says “lunatic asylum” in the beginning not that other atuff
People also think introvert means shy or quiet. It doesn't. It refers to those who find solitude energizing. You can be a very outgoing introvert, or a shy extrovert who finds socialising and people energizing.
There is in Scandinavia !
Yea short poemz.
❤
The shadow
Pure Introvert here, let loose...
He created the term.
Is a dinosaur classified as a carnivores an ambivore and a third classification included also
What’s the difference
According to Jordan Peterson's online personality test,
I am more introverted than 90 people, in a room with 100 people.
(I think that's pretty close to being a complete introvert. 😂)
A complete one maybe, but not a pure one 😅. I am sure that you have some extroverted qualities.
Read the book “quiet”
such a man would be "in lunatic asylum"*, not uni bo luca tipo
That man can’t say anything simply !
😂yea, but still his words are simpler than Peterson's
@@humannature698 BEDEVILED EGG!
@albertkirilov6921 and a good enough explaination is a duty of the lecturer
@@humannature698 try reading Jungs literature, you'll change your mind
Lorsqu'on connaît le point de vue matriciel de sa mentalité... on dit bravo car quel exemple de la médiocrité intellectuelle de son horizon
oui baguette see voo play
@@maxr.3900 avec du beurre svp c'est bien meilleur
ta phrase veut rien dire
Hello
Hello 👋
there is no such thing as no such thing - all things are possible through Christ our Lord.
What about a horse with wings that can fly? is there such a thing?
@@Omegaman1969 yes that would be a unicorn sir.
No such thing as a unicorn
Apparently not forgiveness without human sacrifice.