Will Man City Actually Get RELEGATED Next Season?!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • Get 20% Off and Free Shipping with the code THEKICKOFF at www.manscaped....
    #AD
    **“SkinSafeTM technology does not guarantee cut protection.”
    📧 Business Email : info@truegeordie.com
    🎙️ TG Channel : / @truegeordie
    🥊 The Pain Game : / @paingamepodcast
    ⚽️ The Kick Off : / @thekickoff
    🐦 Twitter : / truegeordietg
    📸 Instagram : / truegeordieofficial

Комментарии • 526

  • @joeloates1685
    @joeloates1685 3 месяца назад +542

    I find it hilarious how True Geordie has spent years hating on Man City for sportswashing (and rightfully so) but is fuming now that there are rules being brought in to stop the Saudis doing the same with his beloved Newcastle. Can't have it both ways mate.

    • @thewalkingpotofjam
      @thewalkingpotofjam 3 месяца назад +66

      it’s the fact that the rules were brought in specifically to stop newcastle’s owners doing what city had done - there had been no attempt to monitor or prevent city’s spending before that. it reeks of protecting the established clubs and stopping competition

    • @jaket4441
      @jaket4441 3 месяца назад +34

      @@thewalkingpotofjamthe rules were brought in 2012 to stop city mate.

    • @joeloates1685
      @joeloates1685 3 месяца назад +12

      @thewalkingpotofjam So what? Why would we want another Man City? And City have been charged, we just need them to be punished which Geordie ironically probably doesn't want now because he knows it'll stop Newcastle

    • @jamesgallagher5907
      @jamesgallagher5907 3 месяца назад +13

      Yep he has completely changed his views just because Newcastle have been bought.

    • @toonarmy8524
      @toonarmy8524 3 месяца назад +12

      Newcastle havent broke the rules though even though they have had the resources to do so for 3 seasons nearly. there`s nothing hilarious about it

  • @Cbart23
    @Cbart23 3 месяца назад +74

    The greedy premier league let the wolves into the hen house two decades ago.

    • @augment999
      @augment999 3 месяца назад +12

      Come on mate Wolverhampton Wanderers are innocent bystanders here don't drag them into this

    • @princegeorge13
      @princegeorge13 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@augment999 He wasn't talking about Wolverhampton Wanderers mate, he meant that the Greed Premier League allowed Chelsea, Manchester City and other clubs to get taken over by billionaires owners over 20 years ago. Even clubs like Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal all have Billionaire owners or billionaire shareholders. That's what he's referring to

    • @benjaminngopwaamos6878
      @benjaminngopwaamos6878 3 месяца назад +1

      @@princegeorge13 Man United and Liverpool are undoubtedly the biggest and most successful clubs in England. They may have billionaire owners, but United especially have not gotten a penny for almost 20 years from the Glazers. United are not meant to be in that list of clubs you mentioned.

    • @daboydudus3912
      @daboydudus3912 3 месяца назад

      @@benjaminngopwaamos6878they are, just cause u did before 2005 dont mean its ok

    • @kurtsudheim825
      @kurtsudheim825 3 месяца назад

      No shirt sherlock, but you can't make rules until something goes wrong. Do you think speed humps were invented before the car? Why wasn't nord van or whoever these guys are always promoting come out before the Internet. Pool rules... unless you have brilliant foresight, you come up with rules once you recognise a problem, that's how things evolve

  • @CH-vh1sw
    @CH-vh1sw 3 месяца назад +187

    The fact that he thinks the Saudis bought Newcastle ‘to have fun’ is actually painfully laughable.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 месяца назад +3

      Cry more🤣🤣......

    • @LukeJohnson-tw5bo
      @LukeJohnson-tw5bo 3 месяца назад +6

      @jackzeldon2883 when you kids say that, it hold more water when you don't use your mums broadband

    • @dripsensei_6639
      @dripsensei_6639 3 месяца назад +4

      wdym i haven’t really looked into it but i always thought buying newcastle and making them an elite european team was just a flex of wealth and power for the saudis more than anything

    • @CH-vh1sw
      @CH-vh1sw 3 месяца назад +8

      @@dripsensei_6639 it’s purely sports washing, not about having fun. It’s about using a British institution to try and rehab an image of a brutal authoritarian country. You’ve got a full city in Newcastle who deny their chairman had a journalist killed and chopped up now because he spends money on footballers.

    • @saintdon4461
      @saintdon4461 3 месяца назад +1

      @@CH-vh1sw then took him out in a suitcase

  • @aeongenesis4181
    @aeongenesis4181 3 месяца назад +55

    These guys are actually clueless. City aren't counter suing they are challenging the league on the new APT rules and saying the league can't legally enforce that rule on the league as its against competition laws in uk. Mind you uefa have a sponsorship law aswell but the one the epl have announced are targeted towards City and Newcastle hence why City has challenged them. Furthermore the outcome of City challenging the rules aren't gonna affect the 115 because this new rule was never in place when the 115 charges happened.

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 месяца назад +11

      Almost everyone I've heard talking about this subject is clueless unfortunately.

    • @conquerantmutombo9957
      @conquerantmutombo9957 3 месяца назад +3

      @@eoslovestithonusthey care about clicks more than facts sadly

    • @Stegibbon
      @Stegibbon 3 месяца назад +5

      They're charged with inflating sponsorships and they're suing about a rule that stops you inflating sponsorships. That might not be the exact rule they broke but if you think they're not trying to at least set a legal precedent here then you're plainly deluded.

    • @gaultyok
      @gaultyok 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Stegibbon Uefa have had this rule in for years well before the prem, City not sueing Uefa as Uefa rule is fairer to everyone. Also you read need to read the charges before commenting

    • @aeongenesis4181
      @aeongenesis4181 3 месяца назад

      @Stegibbon dumbass there's no legal precedent to set when that rule was never in place when the 115 happened. There's zero correlation between the 115 and the City challenging the league on the sponsorship rules because if City win the case the rule will be amended it not go away

  • @garethwhittaker9560
    @garethwhittaker9560 3 месяца назад +30

    The arsenal fan literally just makes things up. Wolves brought var and nearly got it overturned? Dude the vote was 19 to 1 🤣

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 месяца назад +3

      The point was that the Clubs could've got rid of VAR if they wanted to...

    • @garethwhittaker9560
      @garethwhittaker9560 3 месяца назад +2

      Well yes the clubs are the members do they should be able to change rules.

    • @pauldowney4280
      @pauldowney4280 3 месяца назад

      He's a proper muppet

  • @georgebeech491
    @georgebeech491 3 месяца назад +83

    its so annoying listening to brian mention newcastle every 3 seconds

    • @eoslovestithonus
      @eoslovestithonus 3 месяца назад +4

      He is a Newcastle fan to be fair 🤣

    • @KH-xv5gm
      @KH-xv5gm 3 месяца назад +4

      He is a Newcastle fan, why wouldn't he!

    • @TomDeLaCruz
      @TomDeLaCruz 3 месяца назад +3

      thats like watching the overlap and getting annoyed that they always talk about man utd, well obviously

    • @86Refire
      @86Refire 3 месяца назад +1

      The subject doesn’t matter either they’ll be talking about hazard vs Neymar and he’ll still find a way to bring up Newcastle lol

    • @declanure9922
      @declanure9922 3 месяца назад +3

      Called true geordie mate

  • @James-qv1dr
    @James-qv1dr 3 месяца назад +107

    Dumbest convo. You don't need to spend crazy money to improve your team, you just have to buy well. These teams want to just spend 400mil every year until they are the best team

    • @joshuaw9675
      @joshuaw9675 3 месяца назад +11

      Joey acting like he’s club hasn’t spent £1 billion bringing players in for the past few seasons and still has a mediocre squad lol. He wants Man City to win so that Todd Boehly can keep throwing more money at useless players like a retrd and make himself bankrupt 🤣

    • @archiewall124
      @archiewall124 3 месяца назад +1

      @@joshuaw9675Todd boehly isn’t even in charge to any level at chelsea anymore. Keep up.

    • @bhumikjoshi4573
      @bhumikjoshi4573 3 месяца назад +4

      Man utd fans want competitive league now, they outspend everyone in Fergie era.

    • @raycarlbrown-amory3509
      @raycarlbrown-amory3509 3 месяца назад +1

      Exactly

    • @sambog2635
      @sambog2635 3 месяца назад +1

      wow genius, noone had thought about trying to spend money well 🤦‍♂️

  • @raemongill19
    @raemongill19 3 месяца назад +27

    The title of the clip doesn’t even matter on this channel anymore, all convos lead to Brian talking about Newcastle

    • @archiewall124
      @archiewall124 3 месяца назад +2

      Newcastle are extremely relevant in this discussion. Stop whining like a baby.

    • @raemongill19
      @raemongill19 3 месяца назад

      @@archiewall124 are they relevant to every discussion over the last 20 videos

  • @JeremyBercow
    @JeremyBercow 3 месяца назад +67

    PSG have money, Newcastle have money, Man utd have money…you still gotta go and do it on the pitch

    • @KisMiska10
      @KisMiska10 3 месяца назад +7

      PSG before the purchase in 2011 last won Ligue 1 in 1994.
      Since then has won 10 (all but 3 years) of the domestic League, they also have won 10 Coupe de France.
      Though.....0 Champions League 😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣

    • @TomDeLaCruz
      @TomDeLaCruz 3 месяца назад +5

      money buys better players... but just paying loads fo avcerage players like what man utd did is why they look dumb now, and chelsea

    • @KisMiska10
      @KisMiska10 3 месяца назад +1

      @@TomDeLaCruz I thought we were talking about trophies, not (mostly) kickbacks on the transfer of players.

    • @drep9028
      @drep9028 3 месяца назад +2

      Yup. They all shop at the same feeder clubs. It's what you do with the talent. ManU wouldn't know how to manage the talent at City anyway. ManU pipped City to Alexis Sanchez...I didn't worry lol. Pipped em to Mac Guire...I worried even less 😆. When they got casemiro and Varane I wasn't worried either... They could have gotten Carvajal too, still wouldn't get the best of him 😂

    • @Guyfaulkes1605
      @Guyfaulkes1605 3 месяца назад

      ​​​and Liverpool pipped united to gapko and nunez who ain't pulled up any trees have they , as for citeh they will be relegated cos they've sponsored themselves with over inflated sponsorship deals and cooked the books to cover the fact that their owner has even paid the majority of the Etisalat and etihad money 💰 in a shil company called adug , as for united managing talent they seem to be doing OK with players like garnatcho and mannoo , foden only youth player to have made it into citehs first team and become a regular

  • @MoxyHQ
    @MoxyHQ 3 месяца назад +73

    Another half hour long podcast about City from the people who definitely 100% don’t care about City

    • @user-ze3rr9we4f
      @user-ze3rr9we4f 3 месяца назад +5

      They sued the prem what do u expect

    • @business3867
      @business3867 3 месяца назад +16

      You misunderstanding caring about City and caring about them getting the punishment they deserve. Obviously the 3 time in a row winners and serial cheats will get attention but once they are gone no one will care.

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 месяца назад

      Nobody cares about City. Everybody hates the Oil State husk that is currently using Manchester City’s skin to destroy the game that we love.

    • @user-zm3zj3hq3s
      @user-zm3zj3hq3s 3 месяца назад +2

      So only city fans can do this ?

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 месяца назад +2

      @@user-zm3zj3hq3s city fans are burying their head in the sand on this issue. Can you name any prominent fan that has had a serious conversation on this issue?

  • @Chief24.7
    @Chief24.7 3 месяца назад +62

    Geordie really tries to inflate Newcastles importance 😅

    • @kevinhudson7555
      @kevinhudson7555 3 месяца назад +3

      they are important

    • @wiseguy8705
      @wiseguy8705 3 месяца назад +10

      It’s so true. Every conversation he needs to bring up that club

    • @augment999
      @augment999 3 месяца назад +1

      I mean say what you want about them but they're not exactly irrelevant in a conversation about premier league club big money takeovers are they

    • @jonathancampbell9133
      @jonathancampbell9133 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@augment999for this particular video, Newcastle are relevant. But they're irrelevant to most every other topic these guys talk about.
      It's hilarious how sycophantic all Brian's guests are now. Every one of them constantly talks up Newcastle just to stay on his show.

    • @stejonesuk
      @stejonesuk 3 месяца назад

      They are literally the reason the ruling was brought in 😂​@@wiseguy8705

  • @BiggestBirdonMars
    @BiggestBirdonMars 3 месяца назад +11

    You know what this podcast is??
    A clown on Clown conversation😂😂
    This men spent 90% of season saying city and pep would fail this season and yet here we are

    • @DavidRegaL-lw5xz
      @DavidRegaL-lw5xz 3 месяца назад

      Look at City combined 11 with every red title challengers in the 6/7 years. They dominate it with their players and overhype in the media only to always fail

  • @peterferguson6285
    @peterferguson6285 3 месяца назад +5

    CLEARLY Nobody Has Read The CAS Ruling 🙄

    • @BurnCKC
      @BurnCKC 3 месяца назад +4

      Everyone just ignores the bits they don't want to hear. No-one mentions that CAS already ruled that City didn't inflate sponsorship, but instead just focus on the time-barred charges that weren't even heard....as if City got away with it (spoiler, City would have been cleared of those too)

    • @jamiecharles8334
      @jamiecharles8334 3 месяца назад +2

      People say city got off on a technicality with the time barred stuff (like Simon Jordan). What these people don’t realise is that city don’t even have to answer charges that are legitimate. It’s not as if they wriggled out, they didn’t even have a case to answer.

  • @Mcfctreble23
    @Mcfctreble23 3 месяца назад +3

    Utd -Liverpool- arsenal are no longer guaranteed a top four place and all the champions league money. They have to try and put things back to how they used to be.

  • @Demmy480
    @Demmy480 3 месяца назад +4

    Stupid convo. None of them even seem to understand the rule or what city are suing for.

  • @Lawrence4000-s3k
    @Lawrence4000-s3k 3 месяца назад +3

    We do have a competitive league, though: 5 teams have won the title in the past 12 years. In the first 12 years only 3 teams won, with Utd getting 8 titles. It was largely a Utd/Arsenal duopoly until Chelsea arrived. PL income is higher than ever now and the game is more popular than ever. FFP is simply shooting ourselves in the foot against other leagues- let Newcastle, Villa, Everton, etc. spend what they like and have the best league in the world.

    • @bobdrooples
      @bobdrooples 2 месяца назад

      Utd had a youth team and transferred to professionalism sooner.
      Arsenal did it cheaply and were professional with Wenger, nutrition etc.
      Chelsea... money.

  • @CovenantersfriendRTB
    @CovenantersfriendRTB 3 месяца назад +3

    This is why you should research the topic you are about to talk about on a podcast

  • @SamS-uv2ql
    @SamS-uv2ql 3 месяца назад +26

    You guys need to educate yourselves. The rules being challenged didn't exist during the period of time the 115 charges cover.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 месяца назад +3

      Why let Facts interfere w/ a good Cry🤣🤣🤣

    • @Evane120
      @Evane120 3 месяца назад

      Great news! If u watch the video from start to finish they acknowledge that throughout. Hope this helps!

    • @SamS-uv2ql
      @SamS-uv2ql 3 месяца назад +1

      @@Evane120 no they don't. It is briefly touched upon, but then ignored and they go back to stupidly thinking they are linked.

    • @raabmujarrab8342
      @raabmujarrab8342 3 месяца назад

      @@Evane120they are completely disregarding it. The two time frames are completely different for the 2 cases.

    • @Evane120
      @Evane120 3 месяца назад

      @@SamS-uv2ql nope literally just watch start to finish it isn’t difficult

  • @harryrobertson9838
    @harryrobertson9838 3 месяца назад +4

    Villa has a higher wage bill than Newcastle united......

  • @Freddogod
    @Freddogod 3 месяца назад +1

    Money has almost nothing to do with a signing performing well, why can’t fans look at the poor recruitment of their own clubs rather than complaining about the rules not allowing them to spend a bottomless pit of money

  • @Christina_Cage
    @Christina_Cage 3 месяца назад +1

    This guy looking like a mix of HHH and Kratos from God Of War got me learning football better than the many years my ex bfs spent trying to get me to pay attention to what they were teaching me while they were watching games on tele LOL

  • @oliverian07
    @oliverian07 3 месяца назад +5

    It’s such a privilege to watch such highly trained financial experts, clearly they know exactly what they are talking about when it comes to city, you prat’s you actually know nothing about city’s situation other than what you have seen in the media

  • @KMD-qj1qc
    @KMD-qj1qc 3 месяца назад +7

    anybody can press any amounts of legal charges they want against anyone it doesn’t mean anything, Arteta could press 115 charges against Arsenal tomorrow but non of them could be valid

  • @chrismooney3715
    @chrismooney3715 3 дня назад +1

    Correction. The emails can be used as evidence despite them being hacked. No time bar either. It’s not a court but charges of breaking Premier League rules governed by the Premier League.

  • @EthanS95
    @EthanS95 3 месяца назад +2

    This chat literally proves that no matter what people say, all of their opinions on situations depend on if they benefit from it. If Newcastle hadn’t been taken over there is no way TG would have this opinion.

  • @drep9028
    @drep9028 3 месяца назад +1

    If you're a Brentford or Crystal palace...you can have concerns about not being able to spend to compete. If you're ManU, Chelsea, Arsenal et al....youve got enough money to keep your best players and sign lots more. The title races have been close quite often, Pep is just a generational manager, like Fergie and City are well managed by top businessmen n football people

  • @michaelogbebor4582
    @michaelogbebor4582 3 месяца назад +1

    well teams can do what chelsea is doing. stock pile on young talents to sell for double in the future to balance the books and keep sogning big names

  • @scottfitzgerald3421
    @scottfitzgerald3421 3 месяца назад

    The system can only be fixed by putting a cap on the price of players.With all the stats that we see on a game to game basis, there should be some sort of algorithm were players last 3 seasons are taken into account(personal stats, cups won, personal achievements, leagues played in,ect ect) there should be a max cost of a player that has “potential” and ball park figures for players who’ve done “x” and no player stocks be above 80 mil unless you’ve won a champions league and a couple league in your 3 seasons… this would solve all problems in football.

  • @bluemoontroy9647
    @bluemoontroy9647 3 месяца назад +17

    I am sorry lad's but you are talking bollocks

    • @jbo4547
      @jbo4547 3 месяца назад

      Be specific

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 месяца назад +1

      @@jbo4547he won’t be. Nobody in City circles are actually having serious conversations about these issues. They are either banter accounts or they are burying their head in the sand.

    • @DavidRegaL-lw5xz
      @DavidRegaL-lw5xz 3 месяца назад

      ​@@miniman2132so we leave it for the clearly very objective red cartel fanbases to analyze it fairly😂

  • @stevenesbitt3528
    @stevenesbitt3528 3 месяца назад +2

    FFP makes no sense, there was never a level playing field, why does it matter who invests and where?

    • @lenl860
      @lenl860 3 месяца назад

      FFP or PSR does make sense as now we’re watching chelsea, united etc all have to sell players and actually try and spend money better than what they have been doing. And now they’re both dropping out of Europe and the top 4 is more competitive than ever

  • @andrewturnbull8955
    @andrewturnbull8955 3 месяца назад +1

    Shouldn't 'sustainability' have something to do with managing the debts to the point where they're paid off? Should there be another Covid (or something with a similar impact) - based on the status as it is now the likes of Man U, Arsenal, Spurs and Liverpool could just get more loaded with debt, yet still be in line with PSR! The system is mad!

  • @Bigvariant
    @Bigvariant 3 месяца назад +1

    Brian is too attached to his own self interests to see what is right. The rules are there so if your sugardaddy decides to leave you and pulls his money out, that your club then doesn't go bankrupt. That is the only reason the rules are there. Spend what you actually have

  • @pauldry1677
    @pauldry1677 3 месяца назад +1

    City recent domination is due to Pep not who our sponsorship is done by. After Pep the league will become more competitive. As it was before Pep

  • @apurvsingh61
    @apurvsingh61 3 месяца назад +1

    FFP rules are pure BS. Either implement a salary cap that is consistent across the board like the NBA or let clubs do whatever they want even if it means "twisting" the FA rules. Otherwise it's just about the "traditional" top 4 of Manchester United, Liverpoil, Arsenal and Chelsea.

    • @esiriokoro7976
      @esiriokoro7976 3 месяца назад

      The issue with a salary cap is that unlike the NBA the premier league isn’t a closed league.Players will just go where they are paid more

  • @johnrowland6144
    @johnrowland6144 3 месяца назад +1

    if you have read the charges pl no chance city fighting for all small clubs dreams

  • @Sirwanks4lot
    @Sirwanks4lot 3 месяца назад +2

    I’m liking true geordies energy this episode

  • @samuelegu7888
    @samuelegu7888 3 месяца назад +1

    so brians point is basically like saying he would allow the use of ped's by rich unfit people so they can win a gold medal like usain bolt rather than stop the use of that drug

  • @peptalk7658
    @peptalk7658 3 месяца назад +1

    They have no idea what the lawsuit is actually about. Geordie needs a new crew. Keep the tottenham fan. The rest are not good.

  • @andywaterworth4570
    @andywaterworth4570 3 месяца назад +2

    This is not about teams have a rich owner, its about an owner committing money laundering by over inflating a sponsorship deal. This is why everyone is selling their academy kids. The problem is someone like City could claim their sponsor is worth 5 Billion quid a season and never have to worry about FFP or whatever it is called now again.

    • @jackzeldon2883
      @jackzeldon2883 3 месяца назад +2

      No this is about Brown people buying the Wrong clubs......

    • @Bdbtg28691
      @Bdbtg28691 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@jackzeldon2883 British football sold out when they let in the Russian oligarch.

    • @drep9028
      @drep9028 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Bdbtg28691 they sold out when they let American owners in. The Glazer's not even fixing old Trafford leaky roof!

    • @andywaterworth4570
      @andywaterworth4570 3 месяца назад

      @jackzeldon2883 it's got bugger all to do with race and everything to do with stopping 1 or 2 clubs cooking the books. That is what it will.turn into. Geordie even said it himself, he wants city to win the case and then Newcastle can spend whatever they want by having their bosses company sponsor the ground, shirts and anything else by massively over paying. City have brought this now to deflect, and funnily enough, could have to rebuild their squad in the next 12.months with a number of their players looking to leave. How many of that squad will stay if Coty get dumped to the Championship or worse?

  • @mammal1988
    @mammal1988 3 месяца назад +1

    Why does no one ever mention that uefa rules are more stringent, meaning that our rules become irrelevant if you want to be eligible for European football?
    Or am i missing something?

  • @9roobanote
    @9roobanote 3 месяца назад

    If you guys aren't there is something called Related party transacrion. If they are not a "arms length price" (price of transaction to outsiders). They need to be reported and the auditors can qualify the financial statements.

  • @andyscotland7924
    @andyscotland7924 3 месяца назад +1

    26.23 of just pure hate what a bunch of jokers

  • @kumarreaturaj9873
    @kumarreaturaj9873 3 месяца назад

    You can see that clubs like Brighton, Bournemouth, Liverpool, Brentford are not moaning about this bullshit, because they have build their squad fairly & cheaply.

  • @jamesomara3361
    @jamesomara3361 3 месяца назад

    'Waah waaah they can get top four but can go no further"
    What, because their club doesn't generate enough revenue to sustain that spending?
    These people had ZERO issues when Arsenal were having to sell our best players (to Man City) year after year to help fund our new stadium. We didn't skip a step to becoming this massive footballing entity. Now all I'm hearing from Newcastle and Villa fans is they want to skip these steps.

  • @kristian5831
    @kristian5831 3 месяца назад

    The rules were in place to ensure every club would have a lot of homegrown talent.
    If you look at the top clubs in the league each one maybe has 3-5 brilliant homegrown players and the rest are further down the table.

  • @SuperKinlo
    @SuperKinlo 3 месяца назад

    Please give them a monster pay deductions as that will be Leicester and Man City down.
    And as an Ipswich fan it gives us a great opportunity to stay up.

  • @Jamesbaker123
    @Jamesbaker123 3 месяца назад

    The idea behind legislation is sound but the application has been rushed and isn't right. In the past, going back to the 90s for example, we didn't have state owned clubs or owners so rich they could buy an entire state. We had to adapt to these changes and that's a fact. Is it a bit unfair in some instances yes but it would also be unfair to allow these mega owners to run rampant and make a joke out of the league.

  • @amohammed5699
    @amohammed5699 3 месяца назад

    Jacob spot on with this. Keep everyone focused on the main issue at hand. City must be punished for this

  • @Wolf-1211
    @Wolf-1211 Месяц назад

    10:30 the point proven. If city actually get away with this is teams like Newcastle and Everton can follow in the corruption is bonkers

  • @diamondtimelord5762
    @diamondtimelord5762 3 месяца назад +1

    Clueless ... this has nothing to do with 115

  • @richardj2216
    @richardj2216 3 месяца назад +1

    Can anyone throw any light on the State owned Saudi Telecom funding Man Utd?

  • @b3n3j
    @b3n3j 3 месяца назад

    I feel like a point is being missed here. Putting aside the flaws in FFP, which indeed was conceived to protect the cartels, framing the conversation purely on how X or Y now don't have a hope because they won't get bought out by a Gulf state rather validates the need for proper financial regulation. FFP/PSR may be clumsy and need reform, but it's the fact that people view the chances of success as inextricably linked billionaire benefactors that proves financial regulation is necessary. It may be an ugly process, but it *is* necessary, even if it takes a while to take hold.

  • @thembafreedom2463
    @thembafreedom2463 3 месяца назад +1

    You guys just scared that Mac city will win it again×5 don't worry this case will take years to finish just accept it that your team will always fight for top4 hold that Arsenal,man united,Liverpool fun

  • @anthonybevan2912
    @anthonybevan2912 3 месяца назад +5

    The Premier League also included within the new rules that you can’t do business with your associated clubs - Another discrimination against City and similar clubs.

    • @miniman2132
      @miniman2132 3 месяца назад +2

      To call that discrimination is to actively cheapen other matters of real discrimination. This has nothing to do with discriminating against people from other parts of the world, this is about protecting the integrity of the game by stamping out /corruption/.

    • @Jammon23
      @Jammon23 3 месяца назад +1

      Imagine that, buying Mbappe for 200mil for a club in an unknown league then sell him for 1mil to the parent club.

    • @R.Mousasi
      @R.Mousasi 3 месяца назад

      So you are supporting record club transfers like Savio going to troyes and Nuamah going to Molenbeek. And then those players never playing a minute for these clubs? Molenbeek spent 25 million euro just to loan that player straight to Lyon. It's fucking bullshit.

    • @GermanChickenwing
      @GermanChickenwing 3 месяца назад

      ​@@R.MousasiNo 1 is doing that right now

    • @Duval-In-The-Wall
      @Duval-In-The-Wall 3 месяца назад

      Fantastic, multi-club ownership is a plague

  • @j0fiz986
    @j0fiz986 3 месяца назад +1

    It kind of infuriates me football pundits talking about commercial law with no understand of it. Allow me to explain. The premier league creates its own form of contract that governs competition. They made these FFP rules. If the premier league hadn’t done that and football clubs ran like any other business, one large company could give money to another one of its affiliated companies via a company loan. The giving company can tell its shareholders it’s a good investment because it will earn a good return on that investment (interest) and the receiving company is honest with its shareholders that it received loan funds from an investor which are not genuine profits but it will use that money to invest in players and return the loan and more profits. That’s standard business. But because of FFP Manchester City decided to try and go around this by faking genuine investment in the form of advertising. The premier league found this out but it’s bigger than the premier league, this is a crime which can result in jail time, separate to anything to do with the premier league. The giving company lies to its shareholders that advertising funds were for genuine advertising. The receiving company lied to shareholders that the incoming money was genuine revenue when it wasn’t. Man City also cannot justify this hence why they know they will lose. Genuine investment of such a large number is managed by a team, that team looks at all available options at the time and makes a decision that makes sense for an outcome, increasing revenue. Man City at the time makes absolutely no sense as an investment when viewed at non arms length, they were the size of Millwall. The amount charged and paid made no sense and remember the prem can see sponsorship deals city had before and at the same time. No haggling or negotiating, the investor also having no track record of alternative investment strategies. City are fkd. Relegation is the least of their problems tbh.

    • @BiggestBirdonMars
      @BiggestBirdonMars 3 месяца назад

      You wrote so much bullocks😂😂😂😂

    • @j0fiz986
      @j0fiz986 3 месяца назад

      @@BiggestBirdonMars that’s not an intelligent response. A bot could write this on literally any comment on earth. Try using some brain cells

  • @ArchieSimpson-s8e
    @ArchieSimpson-s8e 3 месяца назад +1

    It’s stupid if Nike want to give 100 million to Burnley for example a year then that’s what they value it. If Man City’s sponsors are owned by their owners it’s not properly valued. Would they have sponsored another team for taht much money? No

    • @Sketch2805Studios
      @Sketch2805Studios 3 месяца назад

      Half the companies that sponsored them didn't exist prior to sponsoring city and had no staff ,no offices and did nothing lol they we just p.o boxes and then city also allegedly pumped money into other sponsors to inflate sponsorship and paid under the table secret payments to players ,agents and coaching staff to entice them

  • @tomasj788
    @tomasj788 3 месяца назад

    To get the PL more fair, what about a London tax, an heritage tax etc. Not sure Assna and Manu would like that 😂

    • @les57
      @les57 3 месяца назад

      Who are assna and manu ?

  • @ryan101120
    @ryan101120 3 месяца назад

    What if the billionaire owners and there businesses go bust?
    You have to think about your clubs sustainability and not be selfish by looking at this from just now, these clubs have stood the test of time with rich history. Owners can run clubs into the ground and mind you most of these owners are not even English they do not have the emotional connection the fans have. Think about how many clubs out there have just gone down the pyramid because of poor ownership after miss management

  • @themarkedman72
    @themarkedman72 3 месяца назад

    Brian at the 22.30 mark: Newcastle cant win by merit or compete through merit so let us cheat. There it is.

  • @dresantorini1770
    @dresantorini1770 3 месяца назад

    If this rules changed a smaller pl league team will never her above 10th ever again

  • @Arty2senis
    @Arty2senis 3 месяца назад

    On FFP or financial balance I could only argue term of 3 years is not enough. Maybe it should be 4-5 years. It seem like it takes at least 2-3 years to build a team and only in 3rd, 4th year teams will be able to get finanacial benefits of competing in higher level.

  • @brianbell7137
    @brianbell7137 3 месяца назад

    The best way to sort psr/ffp out is to let every club spend the same amount of money as the highest grossing team that season, i.e., city, I.e. 400-500 million so ever club can spend the same amount of money if owners don't have that money to spend then so be it its better being able to have the chance to spend money than having your hands tied and not being able to spend money

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 месяца назад

    Utd, Liverpool and arsenal don't want Newcastle City and villa, Chelsea to be able to spend money, it's because then they would have to spend to compete, that's means they can't take money out, city have never taken a penny out of football

  • @davidgreen4288
    @davidgreen4288 3 месяца назад

    As an Arsenal fan i think any owner should be able to put money into a club with a cap on the amount they can per season, as long as they club remains protected from any chance of going bankrupt. I would suggest 100m per season.

  • @arnabroy832
    @arnabroy832 3 месяца назад

    EPL already made Antony 90M player and IF City wins then what next? 150M for Antony like players?

  • @Imrano_Rex
    @Imrano_Rex 3 месяца назад +1

    Its not looking good brev

  • @jonzoshokk
    @jonzoshokk 3 месяца назад

    Liverpool arsenal manchester united all have history and a fan base which is why they have money. They built brands. If newcastle everton etc now magically have budgets of 400m a season all that will happen is player prices rise wages rise and they will end up back at square 1

  • @andymcdermott3171
    @andymcdermott3171 3 месяца назад

    How many times is going to court

  • @aslv1999
    @aslv1999 3 месяца назад

    Man said "Abu Derby" 😂🤔

  • @jensgardetun5629
    @jensgardetun5629 3 месяца назад

    Correction, Aston villas annual wages are £117m, Newcastle United's are £84m. So NUFC have 70% of Villa's wage bill.

  • @TheDanielenos
    @TheDanielenos 3 месяца назад

    I’m sorry but the moment you let this pass what you end up with is a situation where if you aren’t nation backed forget even competing. Also, Saudi didn’t buy Newcastle for fun lets be real mate

  • @sameersheriff7078
    @sameersheriff7078 3 месяца назад +1

    Mancity is by for if not the best team in the world right now so why would epl want to relegate them and shoot themselves on the foot ????
    Its not happening guys !!! don't have false hopes

  • @QuickTokens
    @QuickTokens 3 месяца назад +1

    get something on your mic that stops me hearing you inhale every 2 seconds

  • @edpurdy1808
    @edpurdy1808 3 месяца назад

    I dont understand why it doesnt just make sense to make everyone have the same limit we don't need a wild west but an equal playing field.

  • @sim-ej3xn
    @sim-ej3xn 3 месяца назад

    How is the premier league dying? Look at the viewership numbers. More people are watching the premiere league then ever before. The facts and stats reflect that.

  • @andyturner7039
    @andyturner7039 3 месяца назад

    They’re using this case to slow down the November case?😂
    You do realise that the case will last no longer than 2 weeks. Furthermore, Pannick KC is also part of the legal team for City on THIS latest case, whilst heading the 115 team. Why spread him thin when the PL have big hitting KC’s they’ve brought in if they want to “slow down” the November case? Again…the guy in the grey sweatshirt makes himself look a right tool.
    As for the United fan. 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Huncholini
    @Huncholini 3 месяца назад

    People crying about a guy called True GEORDIE talking about Newcastle (his team) on his podcast is mental. That's like saying why does AFTV talk constantly about Arsenal or Goldbridge about United 😂

  • @themarkedman72
    @themarkedman72 3 месяца назад

    Geordie "How can Newcastle cheat" end.

  • @puffin7285
    @puffin7285 3 месяца назад

    Their reaction points to two things potentially. 1) They believe the inquiry is going towards finding them guilty and 2) They also believe the PL is looking to actually punish them beyond a slap on the wrist.

  • @astro9219
    @astro9219 3 месяца назад

    People are underestimating the will of the 4 American-owned clubs. At some point they will propose a breakaway league or ask that city get expelled and they will have grounds. Unlike the super league. These new rules, like it or not, will remain and if you don’t like it you don’t have to participate in the league.

  • @KierenColbeck97
    @KierenColbeck97 3 месяца назад

    People like Brian are the reason this problem exists. All thinking all how it can impact HIM with the health of the competition way way back in his mind that he'll only think about after the damage is done.

  • @handlemchandleton3255
    @handlemchandleton3255 3 месяца назад

    True geordie seriously cant be going after city since his team was essentially setting themselves up to do the same thing. He also loves mentioning man uniteds spend when we actully earn our money from the fans.

  • @HarrisaSports
    @HarrisaSports 3 месяца назад

    Completely ignoring the fact Villa sold Graelish for 100million in there Georgie?.... Unchecked spending will only benefit a few teams and make the league way too uncompetitive and boring. There has to be FFP

  • @prasannabalaji1886
    @prasannabalaji1886 3 месяца назад

    Gunner here... We also sold our best players for more than a decade to pay off the debt and we are a big 6 big 4 big 3

  • @emory_blame
    @emory_blame 3 месяца назад

    House always needs is the best ads from the guys who had a betting ads

  • @Ash31415
    @Ash31415 3 месяца назад +4

    Brian would be talking out the other side of his face if it was a different club to Newcastle who had Saudi owners.

  • @JosephAtkinson-o2r
    @JosephAtkinson-o2r 3 месяца назад

    Without money in football we would have never seen the great players that have graced the premier league over the last 30 years ,you can't have it both ways ,no money top players from around the world will choose to play elsewhere, football will die a slow death

  • @pauldowney4280
    @pauldowney4280 3 месяца назад

    You should be thankful to city for standing up to the yanks, Newcastle haven't got the guts to do it

  • @enkalon333
    @enkalon333 3 месяца назад

    Guy in the pink who says City are a small club every week but is now saying they are the elite? These guys shouldn't even be commenting on this stuff they are so ill informed its crazy.

  • @puffin7285
    @puffin7285 3 месяца назад

    @13:30 erm..... wolves lost that VAR vote 19-1, literally no one supported Wolves so "everyone nearly did" is a blatant lie.
    I get the point trying to be made but bloody hell that was an awful example

  • @circle2867
    @circle2867 3 месяца назад

    no because they are worth too much to the league. i dont think we'll ever see a big six side relegated

  • @jccccccyhjd
    @jccccccyhjd 3 месяца назад

    Smashed it at 13:30 couldn’t be said better

  • @josh-yy8wx
    @josh-yy8wx 3 месяца назад

    I swear him in the red headphones thinks he's a sports lawyer

  • @swedishgooner6339
    @swedishgooner6339 3 месяца назад

    Ok.. so clubs can spend whatever they want on players. How will that benefit the small clubs? It will only render in inflation and crazy fees. The agents will jump from joy..

  • @Notintheknow
    @Notintheknow 3 месяца назад

    Answer to the title
    I doubt city will get relegated
    But honestly think that's the minimum that should happen
    Unfair on their fans but in the grand sceme of things; there is worth stuff happening in the world than a team getting relegated

  • @skitatic
    @skitatic 3 месяца назад

    Does anyone know which team Geordie supports?

  • @awesome8uk405
    @awesome8uk405 3 месяца назад

    Maybe one day u will get people that actually know what they are talking about.

  • @johnrowland6144
    @johnrowland6144 3 месяца назад

    lets have it right all the clubs have done shady things you listed a few just think they can go after you

  • @SamyDirango
    @SamyDirango 3 месяца назад

    There is no other good content if not talking about city always 🙄 its rent free

  • @beaumont6541
    @beaumont6541 3 месяца назад

    Forget PSR, I’m shaking about PRS 😅