Thanks so much Darius ❤️🙏🏽. I love Mark Solms and I totally love where the dual-aspect monism is going!!! Spinoza would be happy 😁. Finally after so much sloshing about in physicalism… not you… but many. ❤️❤️❤️
Apologies, I'm rather focused on Fairbaign's object relations theory lately. I'll return another time. It's great to see Dr. Solms doing new interviews. I subscribed.
30:00 is the explanation! The two "Mark Solms" both consider themselves "the same" but have some value difference *and are aware of that difference*. As that difference is some "value" not measured in the system *but between it's states*, it's a "feeling", because it can classify it, detect it, effect it, the thing "exists", but it cannot be observed directly, it's subjective! :D
@@rockapedra1130 The self is the system that can detect changes in self. To do so, it's a feeling, because there is no external measurement for it, as an external system is detecting changes of other states, self is detecting changes of it's own state.
@@TechyBenah, ok. So it's more of an explanation of the definition of "feeling". Not an explanation of how a feeling can come to manifest itself subjectively to begin with, right?
@@rockapedra1130 Those are words. Things are what we (as existing things) classify. If we classify something it is. What the complexity around this is, is "math" a thing that "physics/matter" is not. We exist, I'm not worried about the mechanism and if it's made of matter, or made of the arrangement or function of matter. Self classification seems to be a thing that exists, and that classification can be listed against other classifications, and we consider that a "feeling" (feeling hungry vs not, happy vs sad etc).
@@rockapedra1130 (It can come to manifestation via the mechanisms that allow for self classification. Sensations of our senses, thinking from our brain, social behaviours, etc. Mechanistically or socially, biologically or mentally)
Would it be useful to restore SURPRISE/STARTLE into ongoing discussion of the core affects, as in Silvan Tomkins' work? At minimum, this would allow a differentiation between Karll Friston's usage of 'surprise' (or surprisal) from Tomkins" ideas.
think the 'hard problem' might mutate to delayed or absence of feeling in order to prioratise awareness of need .the hard problem of Affect.love Mr Solms.
44:47 i like how the interviewer does not let himself get derailed away from the Hard problem. Solms has a lot of great ideas which i find fascinating but they don't quite penetrate into the Hard Problem imho. If I'm understanding Solms' stance correctly, he appears to treat subjectivity as an axiom? "Subjective feelings exist because they do. Things are dual, don't know why. Now let's talk about about how feelings are used." I don't think Solms is saying he has solved the Hard Problem, right? He just wants to talk about details and consequences AFTER the Miracle of subjectivity.
YAY!!! Don't know how I missed this Solms one, but found it now! 🎉
Thanks so much Darius ❤️🙏🏽. I love Mark Solms and I totally love where the dual-aspect monism is going!!! Spinoza would be happy 😁. Finally after so much sloshing about in physicalism… not you… but many. ❤️❤️❤️
Apologies, I'm rather focused on Fairbaign's object relations theory lately. I'll return another time.
It's great to see Dr. Solms doing new interviews. I subscribed.
30:00 is the explanation! The two "Mark Solms" both consider themselves "the same" but have some value difference *and are aware of that difference*. As that difference is some "value" not measured in the system *but between it's states*, it's a "feeling", because it can classify it, detect it, effect it, the thing "exists", but it cannot be observed directly, it's subjective! :D
Can u flesh this out a bit? I'm not sure what u mean by it being "the explanation". Explanation of what? Not the Hard Problem, right?
@@rockapedra1130 The self is the system that can detect changes in self. To do so, it's a feeling, because there is no external measurement for it, as an external system is detecting changes of other states, self is detecting changes of it's own state.
@@TechyBenah, ok. So it's more of an explanation of the definition of "feeling". Not an explanation of how a feeling can come to manifest itself subjectively to begin with, right?
@@rockapedra1130 Those are words. Things are what we (as existing things) classify.
If we classify something it is. What the complexity around this is, is "math" a thing that "physics/matter" is not.
We exist, I'm not worried about the mechanism and if it's made of matter, or made of the arrangement or function of matter.
Self classification seems to be a thing that exists, and that classification can be listed against other classifications, and we consider that a "feeling" (feeling hungry vs not, happy vs sad etc).
@@rockapedra1130 (It can come to manifestation via the mechanisms that allow for self classification.
Sensations of our senses, thinking from our brain, social behaviours, etc. Mechanistically or socially, biologically or mentally)
Would it be useful to restore SURPRISE/STARTLE into ongoing discussion of the core affects, as in Silvan Tomkins' work?
At minimum, this would allow a differentiation between Karll Friston's usage of 'surprise' (or surprisal) from Tomkins" ideas.
think the 'hard problem' might mutate to delayed or absence of feeling in order to prioratise awareness of need .the hard problem of Affect.love Mr Solms.
44:47 i like how the interviewer does not let himself get derailed away from the Hard problem. Solms has a lot of great ideas which i find fascinating but they don't quite penetrate into the Hard Problem imho. If I'm understanding Solms' stance correctly, he appears to treat subjectivity as an axiom? "Subjective feelings exist because they do. Things are dual, don't know why. Now let's talk about about how feelings are used." I don't think Solms is saying he has solved the Hard Problem, right? He just wants to talk about details and consequences AFTER the Miracle of subjectivity.
Take a look at the chapter in Solms’ book Hidden Spring where he addresses the hard problem
@@AnneNicholson-yy5ro thanks. Will do.
Solms/Feldman Barrett discussion
Pt 1: ruclips.net/video/9yEPHUKyBOM/видео.html
Pt 2: ruclips.net/video/Ni3cIhn4xb4/видео.html
I'd love to see Lisa Feldman Barrett on here!
Subjective Perspective of a Conscious Organism
•X(s zPc q(o ) ZC ( O)Q zpc S)Y•
Extended Homeostatic Driver
•Xe h(s z q(δ E)Z(e ∆)Q z S)H eY•
Subjective Conscious Feeling
•X (s zc Fq() ZC ()Qf zc S) Y•
Ah ... U mean
xxd dwfgr 56;65 fvhhev + 3?
@@rockapedra1130 Nope
The video with Lisa was actually quite dull. She doesn’t understand anything Mark is talking about.