Seamless MPLS explained in 10 minutes | What is Seamless MPLS | How does Seamless MPLS work

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 авг 2023
  • Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/pingfactory
    Playlist with more protocols explained in 10 minutes:
    • Networking explained i...
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 17

  • @jeremyshao9141
    @jeremyshao9141 Месяц назад +1

    so what about if the core has a RR, so all ABRs in the core network establish a BGP-LU session with the RR ?

  • @joanelietheiligerruiz3144
    @joanelietheiligerruiz3144 14 дней назад

    Gracias !!!!!

  • @luismayork
    @luismayork 2 месяца назад

    Beatifull explanation !

    • @luismayork
      @luismayork 2 месяца назад

      I wonder , how SR MPLS can resolve the same situation , have you any other video when you explain this , whit SR mpls ? Thanks in advance.

  • @tolgayucel1442
    @tolgayucel1442 10 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you so much, it is one of the best and the most clear explanation of Seamless MPLS

  • @AbhijeetKumar03
    @AbhijeetKumar03 Месяц назад

    Will label be regenerated for IBGP on ABR ?

  • @amalouomar3609
    @amalouomar3609 6 месяцев назад +1

    Thanks , very good job and very clear explanation ❤

  • @Foxlaren
    @Foxlaren 9 месяцев назад

    Thankyou well explained, please also make a video on BGP-LU as u mentioned.

    • @ping-factory
      @ping-factory  9 месяцев назад

      Thanks! BGP-LU is in plan, yes.

  • @mcgreenning
    @mcgreenning 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you for your difficult work. I have a question - does the scheme provide for the possibility of direct communication between regions? As a protection route, for example. Thank you.

    • @ping-factory
      @ping-factory  11 месяцев назад

      Sure, you could have a router that runs both regions processes. It would then run BGP-LU and forward the BGP-LU advertisement from 1 PE to the other. Quite hard to explain just in writing :) Anyway, this wouldn't scale also. Big SP's have like tens of regions, directly connecting each region to each other is almost impossible.

    • @felixruiztorrez5192
      @felixruiztorrez5192 11 месяцев назад

      Hello. In the Alcatel-Lucent Versatile Routing and Services with BGP book by Bookham, mentions that there shouldn't be direct communication between aggregation regions, instead it should go through the core.

    • @ping-factory
      @ping-factory  10 месяцев назад

      @@felixruiztorrez5192 yes, this is correct. This is how it should be done in real world networks, but in the lab you can do anything you wish. And what I was saying before was that we could have direct communication between regions. It would work from a protocol perspective, but it beats the whole purpose of segmentation per regions.

  • @PiotrBawolik
    @PiotrBawolik 2 месяца назад

    Your example is wrong. Seamless MPLS can be used only with OSPF, not with ISIS. I can explain. The ISIS connection between R3(P) and R4(ABS) is Level 2 connection, because only Level 2 connection could be used with 2 different areas. That means that R3 is L1/L2 router, so he KNOW the path to 9.9.9.9 without BGP. And you will run LDP only within each IGP domain there woulnd be a LSP from R1 to R4 (i mean, if you use ISIS).

    • @ping-factory
      @ping-factory  2 месяца назад +1

      Hey! The trick is that you run different ISIS processes in each IGP domain, not different areas/levels. You don't redistribute between the processes so you don't leak prefixes between the IGP domains.