ULTIMATE LEGIT CHECK GUIDE | TRAVIS SCOTT JORDAN 1 MEDIUM OLIVE |REAL VS FAKE | DETAILED BREAKDOWN

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @JDMoreno
    @JDMoreno 28 дней назад

    couple things. Rep pair has a smudge on midsole with blacklight and Cactus Jack logo is off position on the rep pair. just a quick bit of feedback here

    • @fbkickzngear2.0
      @fbkickzngear2.0  28 дней назад +1

      @@JDMoreno while these things you named are differences between this particular retail pair and this particular rep, both are acceptable and can be present on retail pairs. the smudge is paint correction. It happens on many retail pairs as well. And the cactus Jack logo on the side is positioned within retail range. On a size 11 like this all you need to see is the stitching touching the C. It’s never exactly the same position on retail pairs and you can actually see that across the different Travis Scott lows on my channel.

  • @Leroyjomes
    @Leroyjomes 28 дней назад

    Great work here . Very informative

  • @dwayneterrell3143
    @dwayneterrell3143 28 дней назад +1

    With these shoes being mass produced retail or reps... the inconsistency is smthg thats bound to happen.... at least with the reps you get to check qc pics... nike doesn't offer that.... either way just rock shoe..

    • @drewoconnell220
      @drewoconnell220 27 дней назад

      Comment of the day

    • @fbkickzngear2.0
      @fbkickzngear2.0  27 дней назад

      @@dwayneterrell3143 that’s fair. But I can also unload the retail pair for triple what I paid for it and move on to another shoe. I know people don’t like talking about resell value but it’s still a benefit

  • @ahmedzulkarnine2942
    @ahmedzulkarnine2942 10 дней назад

    Hey bro.. where is the Real vs Real comparison video? You should black light both pairs "Cactus" lettering and you will notice a big difference in the neon luminosity.

    • @fbkickzngear2.0
      @fbkickzngear2.0  9 дней назад

      @@ahmedzulkarnine2942 already filmed and editing

  • @barbouradam
    @barbouradam 27 дней назад

    What's crazy is that if you don't have a real pair to compare to in person, there doesn't seem to be a reliable "check this one thing" to authenticate. You threw out the hair on the footbed, but is that it? If you don't have another pair to compare shades of color to, this seems impossible to authenticate.

    • @fbkickzngear2.0
      @fbkickzngear2.0  27 дней назад

      @@barbouradam apps that can scan the stitching underneath the insole like legit app will be able to identify a fake as well. Outside of that, there’s the insole like your mentioned, the box, the label, the boxes that hold the spare laces. Everything else is subtle. Atleast for this specific batch

    • @denrickcarino3483
      @denrickcarino3483 26 дней назад

      Probably the smell and the cactus jack tags are never lined up properly on the tongue. Also no one ever checks for the code behind the tongue under the stitching. And then behind the Nike air on the front will have a white line behind it on the green part of the tongue. Also the hair on the cactus jack on the insole and embroidery are diff

  • @Esignn
    @Esignn 22 часа назад

    The #1 way to tell if these shoes are real or fake. Without watching this video I can tell the pair at the bottom @ 9:31 is fake. The authentic pair suffers from a QC issue from Nike on 99% of their shoes. The blemish at the rim of the shoe right where the Nike swoosh ends at the top. The swoosh is pointing at it. Now go watch every other video and you will see the same blemish. Fakes cant replicate this.

  • @HexuIus
    @HexuIus 27 дней назад +1

    where did you get them