I feel like mass assault should come with also a huge debuffs, as it would be national spirit like "incompetent command" (will fit for russia) that you have to get rid of through focuses or, or keep current doctrine with penalties. This would be too anoying anyway.
they're not balanced. grand battleplan is the best offensive doctrine, mass assault is the best defensive doctrine. superior firepower is okay and is good for smaller width units, NEVER use mobile warfare, its so terrible.
@@exsolverez Yeah, it's too realistic to the time period. You just don't have enough fuel to make it work even if you could motorize the entire army as it encourages
@@exsolverezMobile warfare is god tier for creating encirclements, which is what wins 99% of wars in HOI4. Grand Battleplan for trying to make slow progress. Superior firepower for attrition, and mass assault for infinite troops. The only bad thing about mobile warfare is that if you let your enemy fully fortify, its useless, but you should never allow that, thats the basic idea of the thing. Make successful attacks recover faster so they remain successful.
"Sir we don't have any equipment left, how are we going to charge without weapons?" "But, comrade, you are the weapon" - Mass Assault officer, probably
@@Radishindependent you have inf be less width so you can add more firepower to the divisions so you can do more damage for the same width. Also planning bonus and tanks buffs to do encirclements. It's basically GBP but you want to micro the line more
I was just playing Soviet Union with that doctrine. Had a giant rip off Maginot Line down the Dnieper, from Odessa to Riga. Only lost 200k men to 1.1 million dead Germans.
@all_matters-dm1jw I'm not sure on all the details but iirc it requires planning to max out to be better than superior firepower. On the defense tho arty go pew (Since entrenchment %increase is much closer than the attacking planning bonus difference)
Sadly grand battleplan can get countered by the enemy just having a spy network and it realy sucks. I think each spy network at max strength can reduce entrechment by like 3 or 4 and it stacks when there are multiple countries that have spy networks
@@EscapismFanatic9231a „Wehraboo“ is someone who is like obsessed with the Wehrmacht (german ww2 army). Same thing for „Kaiseraboo“ a guy who is obsessed with the german Kaiser and WW1 Germany
the damage that "enemy at the gates" film caused for historical accuracy for soviet ww2 image is so sad. They took a real set of heroes and turned them into brainless kamikaze soldiers.
I genuinely hate how they portrayed the red army and even Vasily himself, making him out to be some conscript even tho he was a navy officer, the entire movie is a propaganda piece that has unfortunately nestled its way into any historically illiterate person
I love changing doctrines midgame. It's the most painful but fun also rping moments of my German games. Need to get over Britin and hold hordes of red somehow.
@@heinzthorvald4675 Советский союз - это темная эра технологий(СССР был милитаризованной технократией), Путин - император, ВС России - имперская гвардия, ЧВК вагнер - корпус Крига, украинцы - еретики, Донбасс - Кадия, Европа - преспешники Слаанеш, США - преспешники Кхорна и Тзинч.
GBP is best for defensive war tbh. If you want a good attack doctrine, try Superior Firepower. If you lack industries but have a f-k tons of manpower, try Mass Assault. If you have a great industry, Mobile Warfare is your way.
@@GoingForth GBP is the only doctrine that gives a huge amount of planning bonus and it is also the only doctrine that gives a coordination bonus. with organization bonus, it is literally stronger than superior firepower
Basically, only pick Mass Assault if you know you have the means to overwhelm your opponent, if you take any evenly matched engagements you'll simply take extra casualties for free and every other doctrine will fare better there
It most manpower-saving doctrine, what people yapping about. It increase your HP which reduce your overall casualties rate, MA left is what MW want itself to be, MA right is the best defensive doctrine that can lower your casualties nearly 50%. Are people just repeating what 2020 ytber yap about ? The way most people play singleplayer, MA left and GBP is the best as it focus on battle planning and/or constant assault + tank encirclement. SP better than MA if you do slower, poking encircle attack due to it raw stats. MW is just bad in general.
If you're not aware, Mass Assault's minimum training time buff when combined with Anarchist Spain's buffs means you can insta-deploy units as long as you can equip them. Have fun!
@ people who you hate dont even know what modifiers in GBP means bro. What do you mean 20% percent planning and 25% lang night attack??? its pure 32,5 attack bonus like wtff
@@abdulbaasithal-haidar4601 Only those who don't keep up with the game and never learn current meta. GBP left and right and MA is the only doctrine people use in MP nowadays. MW is objectively worse than MA left and GBP is just so busted that SP with it support company buff can't compete.
@@abdulbaasithal-haidar4601fairly rated, right side is better than the left side if u use sf instead of tanks and the night attack bonus is very good, but the best for me is MA right for major and also for minors if u play commie with the manpower bonus for the high hp and reinforce rate
- The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much. - Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning). - GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case). - Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org. - Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better. - MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Doesn't the planning bonus get removed if you manually control anything tho? Thats the big issue, battle plans give you jacked steps for stupid moves. So you only really are better in ideal scenarios.
@@fearedjamesPlanning decays at 3x the rate for manual maneuvers over just letting it do its thing. You can use micro with GBP, but you have to make it count.
I go mobile (mass mechanization and modern blitzkrieg) as ussr with shit ton of medium and hwavy tanks and masterful Blitz... Guess who annexed entire world as supreme union ussr
@@человек-и3б7ьofc ussr literally owns 2/4 of eurasia where you can construct so much factories and plus focuses and has a hell big amount of resources and manpower. However, the Soviet AI still loses to German AI 😅
@@StuckyStucky German ai still loses to chechoslovakia by declaring wars on entire Europe. I was doing commie UK for achievement and nazis just did self destruction, :c
I think it would be objectively wrong to say that the Germans weren't pretty innovative with military technology and technique on the battlefield considering how young of a nation Germany truly is
GBP is the best doctrine, it has good overrall buffs, with a little bit of everything plus a lot of max planning, which is onw of the most OP, yet underrated stats in the game; there's a reason to why its used so often in MP.
That's what makes this doctrine the best is not planning, just +10% coordination. Bonus for planning may be hardly decreased by spies, but coordination will stay with you anyway.
@@orthodox-mp6hv lol, either way, they will be minced meat as you say this just gets it over with quickly and efficiently I guess it was the same thinking as the Guillotine being humane execution device
@orthodox-mp6hv Because during that era without cannons it's was impossible to avoid getting into melee combat. If you want to see an ugly brawl look no further than soldiers in WW1 beating each other to death with whatever was to hand because no one informed high command that sword bayonets fudging SUCK.
With the new Götterdämmerung Update, Superior Firepower became something truly funny. First time i use something different than mobile more than once to test around.
For those who don't know what doctrine to use: Tanks: mobile warfare Infantry with good support and air: superior firepower Infantry with little support: Grand battleplan Jack of all trades, master of none: Mass assault Generally Mass assault is the worst one, but if you somehow don't know how your army will look like, it is a decent choice. Ironically countries with a lot of manpower and not much else are better off with Grand Battleplan thanks to entrenchment bonuses and land night attack, I think this is the biggest misconception
This is just wrong in so many way: - The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much. - Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning). - GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case). - Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org. - Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better. - MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Grand Battleplan is mostly useful if you're planning to go with special forces, like Marines and Paratroopers - as it gives quite a boost for them - or generally plan to be defending in your game most of the time. I'd say Great Britain, Australia and Greece could be good countrie for it. Mass Assault is if your logistics are horrible and if you lead a small and weak nation.
@spookyengie735 Saying that mobile warfare only buffs org ignores how tanks and org works. Tanks on their own typically have very low org. As a result most tank division templates mix in motorized or ideally mechanized for org. This obviously drops the armor and hardness of the unit making it take more damage and likely even drops the overall attack of the unit as well. By buffing the org of the tank you can use less infantry and more actual tanks boosting the division over all. Not all buffs are directly listed.
Superior firepower is the best of all. For the people complaining it has no hard attack, just put several factories on producing AT guns and you'll be fine.
Soviets arguably used more GBP with their "deep battle" doctrine. Soviets did not use mass assault, nobody really did unless in a very desperate situation. It's always the last resort.
@@kirby1225"Массовый штурм" использовали ВСЕ страны в WWII и это не закидывание мясом MA это про ввод резервов, затылок в затылок, чтобы сделать прорыв и выйти на оперативный простор
@@kirby1225 Soviets did use mass assualt, they did left side mass assault. Literally the only problem with the representation of mass assault in game is that paradox decided to give it a stupid name. In terms of stats and effects it's both actually very powerful and actually very accurately depicts WW2 soviet doctrine. If paradox had instead called MA something like "deep operation", or "reserve fighting", or something else like that, no one would bat an eye and people would probably treat it way more seriously.
Ребят, 4, доктрина (до перехода на правую и левую ветку) на самом деле доктрина первой мировой, на начальном этапе войны 1914 года, с культом наступления, тактик обходов и охватов. Именно по этому 4 доктрина улучшает кавалерию которая манёврено окружает вражеские войска, уменьшает ширину фронта у войск, и работа в окружении (если воцска всё таки попали в окружение из за кавалерии и тд) далее в поздеи пеериоде есть бонус к укреплённости. Далее в 1916-1917 по большей части использовалась вторая и третья доктрина из хойки, в виде массированых артобстрелов которые длились днями, сконцентрированыц огонь на огневых точках, загражительный огонь в обороне (доктрина первосходства огневой мощи) + Всё это было скоординировано по времени как в доктоине крупномаштабного планирования Первой доктоины не было ибо крупные танковые соединения прилумали немцы после поражения в великой войне.
Superior firepower is dog shit, mass mob is for defensive 16ws, GBP is for statmaxing on the attack and mobile warfare is for countering guerilla tactics in askar mod
Mobile is good if you start off as a major power or minor power that s snowballs in industry quickly. Superior is always good regardless imo. I don’t see why you’d ever use grand battle plan or mass assault.
GB also has some really good officer corps spirits. MA is a great defensive doctrine for nations with massive populations - ie, China and the USSR. It also, interestingly, is good for lil nations because it can give manpower bonuses. Ideally though, once you are in a position to attack, you should change your doctrine to MW or SF.
GBP left gives the most planning bonus. You sit at least +30 more max planning. It also gives a lot of good bonuses like entrenchment, breakthrough and organization. It is literally proven in the community that GBP is the mathematically superior doctrine
I swear the more i read this comment section the more i realize people are stuck in 2020 with their doctrine understanding. - The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much. - Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning). - GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case). - Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org. - Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better. - MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Для меня было открытием, что британская доктрина Grand Battle Plan оказывается полностью повторяет все тактики ПМВ и их развитие, в том числе тактики инфильтрации как это делали Штурмовые отряды британцев, Штурмовики немцев и Ардити итальянцев.
Tips: Mobile Warfare - maximum use of resources, fast war less expense Superior Firepower - best for breaking deeply fortified entrenched enemy lines Grand Battle Plan - only good if you're in balance with the invader or yours. To prevent economic breakdown by balancing military funds and economic output. Long war but less damage to economy. Mass Assault - for countries who have superior manpower increase modifier or big countries. Good if you're making counter attack like soviet in ww2 Btw i play RON cuz i cant afford hoi4
Grand Battleplan: If you wanna be a villain number one You have to chase a superhero on the run But first you have to come up with a master plot The only problem there: you have to think a lot
Mass Assault/Deep Battle is literally the most misunderstood doctrine of all time, though it's kinda understandable, especially since HoI4 players are just common people who were bought in by pop culture. And Paradox also in the blame by it by putting such a misleading name & description for it, even though by practice it is fairly well simulated. Just because "you put bodies in the frontline" it doesnt mean what u see is that Enemy at the Gates charge trope that you see, it is purely a myth, misinterpretation of historical document, & antagonistic if i want to be very blunt, if anything Deep Battle is waaaaayy more manpower efficient compared to US's "Individual Replacement System" which by practice is closer to a human wave tactic we've seen in WW2, even historical records from Soviet officials & Western observer agreed. If US were in Soviet's place back in 1939 they would lost more than 5x the casualties that were inflicted by Germans to Soviets, and lets be real, Germans looked down on the western front, their strongest most elite units are all on the eastern front, Battle of the Bulge is a great example of what a fraction of true fighting capability of German Eastern Unit, its terrifying, & the allies barely able to deal with it, and that's exactly what the soviets are fighting against since 1939. In gameplay perspective, Deep Battle/Mass Assault fills the most amount of frontline, has lowest trickleback, great supply buffs, & almost immune to Blitzkrieg, in my experience Mass Assault is the most effective & reliable way to play tinier states with absolutely no industrial capabilities, if you're US or Germany u can absolutely use Superior firepower purely because of the factory output, but your frontline is as barren as the no man's land, and if ur manpower is low then they just refuse to fight. At this point "Human Waves" are just slanders, its almost purely myth, and if i want to use fair standards, the Allies in WW1 does more 'human waves' than the Chinese in the entirity of 2nd Sino Japanese War. and in game perspective, Grand Battleplan IS the human wave tactic.
You say a lot of nothing. Instead you could've just pointed out that the a more accurate name for the human wave style attacks that get memed on so much are more properly called "recon in force" by sending in the penal battalions to die in droves and nothing where they were dying the fastest Soviet high command could figure out where the enemy was weakest breaking the German lines open to encircle the hard points to be defeated in detail or merely contained and left to starve. It was a rather pragmatic approach to warfare that coping commies somehow fail to properly defend as they spend too much time sucking down German propaganda and smack talking the allies. The Germans were not super men they merely had the benefit of breathtaking incompetence in their enemies and stealing the homework of Percy Hobard's homework about the future of modern warfare. Once their enemies removed their heads from their collective orfaces they promptly got their German weiners flattened.
I love MW because everything is fast af (especially tanks). Its not about having the best stats overall but by just being faster and creating encirclements by just being fast af, securing victory points and supply hubs faster than the enemy can redeploy. Something in my monkey brain just experiences satisfaction when the plan worked out. Major debuff is that MW infantry is in comparison very bad
because the AI is terrible. fight real players and you would get obliterated. infantry artillery is horrible. NEVER use artillery unless its for marines, its never worth the IC cost to stats ratio.
@@NctLenovobilgisayar Artillery are ranged weapons that launch munitions far beyond the range and power of infantry firearms. Early artillery development focused on the ability to breach defensive walls and fortifications during sieges, and led to heavy, fairly immobile siege engines. As technology improved, lighter, more mobile field artillery cannons developed for battlefield use. This development continues today; modern self-propelled artillery vehicles are highly mobile weapons of great versatility generally providing the largest share of an army's total firepower. US Artillerymen test fire an M777 Lightweight 155-millimeter Howitzer at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms (2005) Originally, the word "artillery" referred to any group of soldiers primarily armed with some form of manufactured weapon or armour. Since the introduction of gunpowder and cannon, "artillery" has largely meant cannon, and in contemporary usage, usually refers to shell-firing guns, howitzers, and mortars (collectively called barrel artillery, cannon artillery or gun artillery) and rocket artillery. In common speech, the word "artillery" is often used to refer to individual devices, along with their accessories and fittings, although these assemblages are more properly called "equipment". However, there is no generally recognized generic term for a gun, howitzer, mortar, and so forth: the United States uses "artillery piece", but most English-speaking armies use "gun" and "mortar". The projectiles fired are typically either "shot" (if solid) or "shell" (if not solid). Historically, variants of solid shot including canister, chain shot and grapeshot were also used. "Shell" is a widely used generic term for a projectile, which is a component of munitions. By association, artillery may also refer to the arm of service that customarily operates such engines. In some armies, the artillery arm has operated field, coastal, anti-aircraft, and anti-tank artillery; in others these have been separate arms, and with some nations coastal has been a naval or marine responsibility. In the 20th century, target acquisition devices (such as radar) and techniques (such as sound ranging and flash spotting) emerged, primarily for artillery. These are usually utilized by one or more of the artillery arms. The widespread adoption of indirect fire in the early 20th century introduced the need for specialist data for field artillery, notably survey and meteorological, and in some armies, provision of these are the responsibility of the artillery arm. The majority of combat deaths in the Napoleonic Wars, World War I, and World War II were caused by artillery.[1] In 1944, Joseph Stalin said in a speech that artillery was "the god of war".[1]
Basicly this is how it works (source proven with the trust me bro method) Mob warfare: i got everything in my nation both industry and men Sup firepower: i can get industry but i dont have a lot of men i need to focus on well firepower grand battleplan: im lazy have everything and dont wanna micro when my generals can do it for me and feel a bit nostalgic about the good old days mass assault: ye i just dont care about my soldiers the motherland is the only thing which must be protected ( and OUR regime if u know u know )
Mobile Warfare is just too good on the offensive even if the AI tries to stack divisions on the frontline, and combined with CAS you'll just reinforce meme them to death.
Mobile Warfare: MORE TANKSSSSS🗿 Superior Firepower: UNLIMITED POWEERRR 🗿 Grand Battleplan: we’ll just never attack, someone else will 💀💩 Mass Assault: I love scraping the barrel! (Aka what’s an economy)
It’s mass assault, as the name implies you just throw waves of personnel at the enemy. Essentially he is acting as a human shield of sole sorts, if he can grab a gun he prob will but more likely than not he will just be sent out to die and act as cover for troops behind him. This is all to my understanding though
who needs hard attack anyway?- supreior firepower users
Me when I pull up with 90% hardness tank divs:💀💀
We dont need the attack to win. Thats why we call it superior
This but unironically
Is the only doctrine that give you hard attack😂
я только через 4 или 3 доку играю
"God fights on the side with the best artillery"
-Napoleon Bonaparte
did napoleon have F-35s? i dont think so
@@monkeyman2074the f35 can be considered clóse Air support and the clóse Air support Is Air artillery
@@monkeyman2074 do you have an F-35 in your backyard? i dont think so
@@monkeyman2074is it artillery bro?
@@monkeyman2074Napoleon was a artillery officer 🤦♂️
"You need to make more manpower" - Mass assault user (Soviet/ chines player, probably)
mass assault is the Multi meta for like 2 Years its crazy that paradox didnt nerfed it yet
I feel like mass assault should come with also a huge debuffs, as it would be national spirit like "incompetent command" (will fit for russia) that you have to get rid of through focuses or, or keep current doctrine with penalties.
This would be too anoying anyway.
@@sh-kq4robro this one is myth, if we just send our ppl to enemies we don't sin the war then
@@sh-kq4rothis is so unfair if only MA gets debuffs, as other doctrines also respectively has their own disadvantages
Осуждаю
This comments section just shows how balanced the doctrines actually are
edit: shit i might have started a race war
I love them all they all offer you different gameplays
they're not balanced. grand battleplan is the best offensive doctrine, mass assault is the best defensive doctrine. superior firepower is okay and is good for smaller width units, NEVER use mobile warfare, its so terrible.
@@exsolverez Yeah, it's too realistic to the time period. You just don't have enough fuel to make it work even if you could motorize the entire army as it encourages
@@exsolverez lmao thats literally the same thing im thinking
@@exsolverezMobile warfare is god tier for creating encirclements, which is what wins 99% of wars in HOI4.
Grand Battleplan for trying to make slow progress. Superior firepower for attrition, and mass assault for infinite troops.
The only bad thing about mobile warfare is that if you let your enemy fully fortify, its useless, but you should never allow that, thats the basic idea of the thing. Make successful attacks recover faster so they remain successful.
Grand Battle Plan users: Micro? Never heard of it
Я на Маньчжоу-го и Франции - ну да ну да ))))
unironically it's the doctine i end up micro-ing the most with
Mass mob users, you mean?
"Sir we don't have any equipment left, how are we going to charge without weapons?"
"But, comrade, you are the weapon" - Mass Assault officer, probably
It was only real for the chinese the idea that the soviet did this is a myth
"when turning back took more confidence than charging an enemy weaponless"
stop being misled by the name lmao.
that's not how Mass Assault works.
@@black_thunder2159 enlighten me
@@Radishindependent you have inf be less width so you can add more firepower to the divisions so you can do more damage for the same width.
Also planning bonus and tanks buffs to do encirclements.
It's basically GBP but you want to micro the line more
"searching for a place where i can stand tall" _stands tall and gets shot immediately_ 1:57
WHY IS THAT SO FUNNY LMAOOO
Unpopular opinion since i saw these comments: Superior firepower doctrine is goated
dude it's everyone's fav, hell i even once tried that withs soviets and gave double the casualties to germans lmao
@@aryanpatil9369 Other people in the comment sections are telling otherwise, anyways are you iranian?
If artillery doesn't win the battle, you're not using enough of it.
I was just playing Soviet Union with that doctrine. Had a giant rip off Maginot Line down the Dnieper, from Odessa to Riga. Only lost 200k men to 1.1 million dead Germans.
It is one of the reasons it's Bittersteel's favorite doctrine
Superior Firepower all goddamn day.
Hell yeah
"b- but grand battlep-plan is statistically superio-" I DONT GIVE A DAMNNN
@ the free division alteration for arty is epic though.
Unless starting doctrine is picked for me, I use superior firepower
@all_matters-dm1jw I'm not sure on all the details but iirc it requires planning to max out to be better than superior firepower.
On the defense tho arty go pew
(Since entrenchment %increase is much closer than the attacking planning bonus difference)
"He's just a friend"
-Mobile Warfare Doctrine
*her at night
2:48 you know, with this music, the doctrine is actually looks pretty effective
Yes
Это кавер на песню из Red Alert 3 от группы РАДИО ТАПОК (и нет, переводчик не ошибся, действительно тапок)
@@xakerors2279 крутой он паренек, я даже на его концерте был
Это музыка от радио тапка
Music is pure hype
"Quantity has a quality all its own" -Mass assault player-
Sacrifices alot of troops
@@jmgonzales7701 just a statistic we have equated for comrade
@@bencurran3204 did u win thou?
Grand Battleplan ❤
Sadly grand battleplan can get countered by the enemy just having a spy network and it realy sucks. I think each spy network at max strength can reduce entrechment by like 3 or 4 and it stacks when there are multiple countries that have spy networks
Call me wehraboo, but I love Mobile Warfare doctrine
Ofn? Opinion on sablinist ussr?
i dunno what a wehraboo is, but i also love mobile warfare doctrine.
@@EscapismFanatic9231a „Wehraboo“ is someone who is like obsessed with the Wehrmacht (german ww2 army). Same thing for „Kaiseraboo“ a guy who is obsessed with the german Kaiser and WW1 Germany
@@poggingmilk9452 ohhh, i see. thanks.
Best doctrine as Free American Empire 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸✊❤️🦅🦅
the damage that "enemy at the gates" film caused for historical accuracy for soviet ww2 image is so sad. They took a real set of heroes and turned them into brainless kamikaze soldiers.
Lore accurate Soviets
I genuinely hate how they portrayed the red army and even Vasily himself, making him out to be some conscript even tho he was a navy officer, the entire movie is a propaganda piece that has unfortunately nestled its way into any historically illiterate person
i genuinely hate ussr and everything to do with it but even i know damn well that none of that bs is even remotely Accurate
@@Patriot-290 lmao no
@@anti-mate407 imao yes
Superior Firepower Gang assemble
I love changing doctrines midgame. It's the most painful but fun also rping moments of my German games. Need to get over Britin and hold hordes of red somehow.
@@kurosu-samaklipleri7090 superior firepower is the best to wear down a superior number of enemies until you killed their entire manpower
Just use consol commands and get all the doctrines
Should have used the Bosnian artillery song.
your so right bro
ARTILERIJA 🗣🗣🗣📢📢📢🔥🔥🔥💥💥💥
BERKIJAAAA
2:47 Astra militarum be like:
The Emperor protects -also, he might have been Stalin in one of his past lives-
The Death Korps of Krieg in a nutshell
@@slovakia1938 The Kriegsman are specialized in trench warfare, they would represent GBP doctrine better
@@heinzthorvald4675 Советский союз - это темная эра технологий(СССР был милитаризованной технократией), Путин - император, ВС России - имперская гвардия, ЧВК вагнер - корпус Крига, украинцы - еретики, Донбасс - Кадия, Европа - преспешники Слаанеш, США - преспешники Кхорна и Тзинч.
@F4ll1N-j4g hail chaos then
unpopular opinion: superior firepower is better than mass assault on soviet union
Totaly agree
Battleplan is the best by the way
well yeah, MA fucking sucks
Grand Battleplan Left gives you the strongest Panzers, not Mobile Warfare
@@ыцццФццц not at all. You need to use battle plans for it.
GBP best doctrine and with 21 width + rangers best
Most Modern WW1 general:
GBP is best for defensive war tbh. If you want a good attack doctrine, try Superior Firepower. If you lack industries but have a f-k tons of manpower, try Mass Assault. If you have a great industry, Mobile Warfare is your way.
@@GoingForth nah, GBP have the most buff atack with max planning, you can make the teste : ORG x SOFT + % of M.Planning
@@matheusdesouzadomingheti9660 Nah, I love Superior Firepower. Artillery lovers 🗣️❤️
@@GoingForth GBP is the only doctrine that gives a huge amount of planning bonus and it is also the only doctrine that gives a coordination bonus. with organization bonus, it is literally stronger than superior firepower
Basically, only pick Mass Assault if you know you have the means to overwhelm your opponent, if you take any evenly matched engagements you'll simply take extra casualties for free and every other doctrine will fare better there
It most manpower-saving doctrine, what people yapping about. It increase your HP which reduce your overall casualties rate, MA left is what MW want itself to be, MA right is the best defensive doctrine that can lower your casualties nearly 50%.
Are people just repeating what 2020 ytber yap about ?
The way most people play singleplayer, MA left and GBP is the best as it focus on battle planning and/or constant assault + tank encirclement. SP better than MA if you do slower, poking encircle attack due to it raw stats. MW is just bad in general.
If you're not aware, Mass Assault's minimum training time buff when combined with Anarchist Spain's buffs means you can insta-deploy units as long as you can equip them.
Have fun!
Lmaoo that's insane
GBP right side is goated
Or underrated? I always use that and people hate me.
@ people who you hate dont even know what modifiers in GBP means bro. What do you mean 20% percent planning and 25% lang night attack??? its pure 32,5 attack bonus like wtff
@@abdulbaasithal-haidar4601 Only those who don't keep up with the game and never learn current meta. GBP left and right and MA is the only doctrine people use in MP nowadays. MW is objectively worse than MA left and GBP is just so busted that SP with it support company buff can't compete.
@@abdulbaasithal-haidar4601fairly rated, right side is better than the left side if u use sf instead of tanks and the night attack bonus is very good, but the best for me is MA right for major and also for minors if u play commie with the manpower bonus for the high hp and reinforce rate
Nighttime Infiltration is goated
- The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much.
- Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning).
- GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case).
- Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org.
- Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better.
- MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Doesn't the planning bonus get removed if you manually control anything tho?
Thats the big issue, battle plans give you jacked steps for stupid moves. So you only really are better in ideal scenarios.
For MW It's not about winning everytime you face an enemy, its about winning without facing the enemy.
You don't know how to make fences, do you?
@@fearedjames No, you just need to have a frontline
@@fearedjamesPlanning decays at 3x the rate for manual maneuvers over just letting it do its thing. You can use micro with GBP, but you have to make it count.
Mass Assault is 🐐 once you reach the Deep Battle part of the doctrine
3:10-4:20 вы единственный кто взял переработанную музыку
"if we encounter a minefield, our infintry attack as if it were not there."
-Georgy Zhukov
Слова американского генерала приписывают Жукову, это то, как пропаганда работает
И ведь кто-то верит в эту ложь😂😂😂
@@F4ll1N-j4g You saying the well-known FACT that the Soviets treated their all their men as cannon fodder is a lie?
@@thecatfather857source?
I go mobile (mass mechanization and modern blitzkrieg) as ussr with shit ton of medium and hwavy tanks and masterful Blitz... Guess who annexed entire world as supreme union ussr
Hello grisha who is it going?
@@hansmohammed5486 I'm not grisha lol. And wdym like generally, lol
Just saying that ussr is too op in game, even with "worst" path
@@человек-и3б7ьofc ussr literally owns 2/4 of eurasia where you can construct so much factories and plus focuses and has a hell big amount of resources and manpower. However, the Soviet AI still loses to German AI 😅
@@StuckyStucky German ai still loses to chechoslovakia by declaring wars on entire Europe. I was doing commie UK for achievement and nazis just did self destruction, :c
Me when artillery, 6-2 is best formation in 1936
Hilarious how three of these use the German army as examples (I know one was Prussia)
I think it would be objectively wrong to say that the Germans weren't pretty innovative with military technology and technique on the battlefield considering how young of a nation Germany truly is
MA is portrayed inaccurately, the soviets went down the left side. the EATG clip shows a alt hist where they went down right side
Grand battleplan: I gonna sit there and do nothing until all my enemies give up or die from old age.
All: USSR is definitely the fourth doctrine
USSR in World War II: Artillery - God of War
The fact that the Mass Assault Doctrine uses the Soviet March (Command and Conquer: Red Alert 3) version that's ACTUALLY Russian, just, YES.
What language is the more well known one in? I've only ever heard that version, this one is new to me
What movie is that 0:58
2001: a space odyssey
I think it's a danish series about the Schwelsig-Holstein war, but I don't remember the name
"1864" is the title sir
1864 is dybbol scene also (maybe i didn't watch it so long)
1864, a Danish series
Manpower is cheap, weapon is pricely
GBP is the best doctrine, it has good overrall buffs, with a little bit of everything plus a lot of max planning, which is onw of the most OP, yet underrated stats in the game; there's a reason to why its used so often in MP.
That's what makes this doctrine the best is not planning, just +10% coordination. Bonus for planning may be hardly decreased by spies, but coordination will stay with you anyway.
I have yet to meet bullet who can outsmart man. Mass assault doctrine
“Artillery adds dignity to what would otherwise be an ugly brawl” --Fredrick the Great
I always found that quote funny, what dignity is there to turn the enemy formation into minced meat or paste?
@@orthodox-mp6hv lol, either way, they will be minced meat as you say this just gets it over with quickly and efficiently I guess it was the same thinking as the Guillotine being humane execution device
@@orthodox-mp6hv The dignity in not minced meat too.
@orthodox-mp6hv
Because during that era without cannons it's was impossible to avoid getting into melee combat. If you want to see an ugly brawl look no further than soldiers in WW1 beating each other to death with whatever was to hand because no one informed high command that sword bayonets fudging SUCK.
With the new Götterdämmerung Update, Superior Firepower became something truly funny. First time i use something different than mobile more than once to test around.
accurate
For those who don't know what doctrine to use:
Tanks: mobile warfare
Infantry with good support and air: superior firepower
Infantry with little support: Grand battleplan
Jack of all trades, master of none: Mass assault
Generally Mass assault is the worst one, but if you somehow don't know how your army will look like, it is a decent choice. Ironically countries with a lot of manpower and not much else are better off with Grand Battleplan thanks to entrenchment bonuses and land night attack, I think this is the biggest misconception
no
This is just wrong in so many way:
- The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much.
- Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning).
- GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case).
- Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org.
- Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better.
- MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Grand Battleplan is mostly useful if you're planning to go with special forces, like Marines and Paratroopers - as it gives quite a boost for them - or generally plan to be defending in your game most of the time. I'd say Great Britain, Australia and Greece could be good countrie for it.
Mass Assault is if your logistics are horrible and if you lead a small and weak nation.
Tanks and general offense, GBP
Defense it’s either mass assault or mobile warfare since you get guerrilla warfare
@spookyengie735
Saying that mobile warfare only buffs org ignores how tanks and org works.
Tanks on their own typically have very low org. As a result most tank division templates mix in motorized or ideally mechanized for org. This obviously drops the armor and hardness of the unit making it take more damage and likely even drops the overall attack of the unit as well.
By buffing the org of the tank you can use less infantry and more actual tanks boosting the division over all.
Not all buffs are directly listed.
Superior firepower is the best of all. For the people complaining it has no hard attack, just put several factories on producing AT guns and you'll be fine.
Now we need videos for naval, air and sf
0:24 is it from Eastory?
Yes
@ I watched that all episodes
The scene used in superior firepower is also what I feel when I use howitzers in the great war redux
there is no worry about an enemy charging through a field if the field is wiped out of existence
Ironically the soviets did not use the second tech in Mass assault. Doctrines need a rework so badly.
Soviets arguably used more GBP with their "deep battle" doctrine. Soviets did not use mass assault, nobody really did unless in a very desperate situation. It's always the last resort.
@@kirby1225"Массовый штурм" использовали ВСЕ страны в WWII и это не закидывание мясом
MA это про ввод резервов, затылок в затылок, чтобы сделать прорыв и выйти на оперативный простор
@@kirby1225 Soviets did use mass assualt, they did left side mass assault. Literally the only problem with the representation of mass assault in game is that paradox decided to give it a stupid name. In terms of stats and effects it's both actually very powerful and actually very accurately depicts WW2 soviet doctrine.
If paradox had instead called MA something like "deep operation", or "reserve fighting", or something else like that, no one would bat an eye and people would probably treat it way more seriously.
Ребят, 4, доктрина (до перехода на правую и левую ветку) на самом деле доктрина первой мировой, на начальном этапе войны 1914 года, с культом наступления, тактик обходов и охватов.
Именно по этому 4 доктрина улучшает кавалерию которая манёврено окружает вражеские войска, уменьшает ширину фронта у войск, и работа в окружении (если воцска всё таки попали в окружение из за кавалерии и тд) далее в поздеи пеериоде есть бонус к укреплённости.
Далее в 1916-1917 по большей части использовалась вторая и третья доктрина из хойки, в виде массированых артобстрелов которые длились днями, сконцентрированыц огонь на огневых точках, загражительный огонь в обороне (доктрина первосходства огневой мощи)
+ Всё это было скоординировано по времени как в доктоине крупномаштабного планирования
Первой доктоины не было ибо крупные танковые соединения прилумали немцы после поражения в великой войне.
Superior firepower is dog shit, mass mob is for defensive 16ws, GBP is for statmaxing on the attack and mobile warfare is for countering guerilla tactics in askar mod
I just need to stick to the plan, no matter how many years and lives it takes. - Grand Battle Plan
Mobile is good if you start off as a major power or minor power that s snowballs in industry quickly. Superior is always good regardless imo. I don’t see why you’d ever use grand battle plan or mass assault.
GB is good if you need to spend a lot of time defending
GB also has some really good officer corps spirits. MA is a great defensive doctrine for nations with massive populations - ie, China and the USSR. It also, interestingly, is good for lil nations because it can give manpower bonuses. Ideally though, once you are in a position to attack, you should change your doctrine to MW or SF.
GBP left gives the most planning bonus. You sit at least +30 more max planning. It also gives a lot of good bonuses like entrenchment, breakthrough and organization. It is literally proven in the community that GBP is the mathematically superior doctrine
I swear the more i read this comment section the more i realize people are stuck in 2020 with their doctrine understanding.
- The best doctrine for tank is Grand Battle Plan (GBP), planning bonus is very significant which is one of the key reason why GBP increase tank damage so much.
- Superior Fire is heavily nerf as it only provide a 10% damage bonus and some increase in support company stats, it still a decent doctrine but easily outclassed in MP, in SP it perfectly serviceable but GBP outperformed in most scenario minus (no planning at all, which you only need to active staff plan and wait like 5 days to max out planning).
- GBP have the highest damage output in the game, it the jack of all trade (as matter of all in this case).
- Mobile Warfare might be the worst doctrine simply because it focus only on tank, which it itself doesn't buff much in term of damage, only org.
- Mass Assault is either the third or second best depend on your playstyle. The thing that make MA left (Deep battle) is what MW want itself to be. MA left major benefit over MW and SP is it extended supply and fast recovery rate. If your play style is constant battleplan across the front with tank micro, MA left is arguably better than MW. GBP is still better due to bonus from planning but if you more hasty, MA left is better.
- MA right is the defensive guerilla meme doctrine, you can outspam the German, it the grinding enemy down doctrine, which is quite good for minor as MA is the most manpower-saving doctrine (despite people imagining mass assault meant you die more)
Grand Battleplan is very good for Special Forces, as it gives a bonus to entrenchement.
Для меня было открытием, что британская доктрина Grand Battle Plan оказывается полностью повторяет все тактики ПМВ и их развитие, в том числе тактики инфильтрации как это делали Штурмовые отряды британцев, Штурмовики немцев и Ардити итальянцев.
鋼鐵雄心4人海突擊學假的
人海突襲才是閃電戰😂😂
Where the hell is air -superiority- supremacy?
Лучший представитель последней доктрины - Япония с банзай атакой
Use the Blitzkrieg to break the Soviet lines meanwhile Ghost Division sound on top volume in your hear.Fucking awesome!!!
I am addicted to grand battle plan with night attack and general entrenchment traits
Mass Assault is the average Enlisted expirience
Can I please get the name of the song played during "Grand battle plan doctrine"?
I loved it.
Tips:
Mobile Warfare - maximum use of resources, fast war less expense
Superior Firepower - best for breaking deeply fortified entrenched enemy lines
Grand Battle Plan - only good if you're in balance with the invader or yours. To prevent economic breakdown by balancing military funds and economic output. Long war but less damage to economy.
Mass Assault - for countries who have superior manpower increase modifier or big countries. Good if you're making counter attack like soviet in ww2
Btw i play RON cuz i cant afford hoi4
footage for grand battleplan doctrine was its pov when fighting against superior firepower
Can someone list the movies appeared in this video please... Thanks
try test all at once love that too
unbelievable
GBP is like Batman it needs its prep time.
Grand Battleplan:
If you wanna be a villain number one
You have to chase a superhero on the run
But first you have to come up with a master plot
The only problem there: you have to think a lot
PLAY YOUR ARTILLERY LOUDER !!! I CAN’T HEAR IT WITH ALL THIS PRUSSIA’S GLORY!!!
Mass assault soviets be like : when turning back requires more confidence than charging an enemy weaponless
MA это доктрина глубоких операций, это советский блицкриг, вы вообще играли в HoI ?
@@Sotrudnik_fonda i have been playing hoi since 8th grade
Mass Assault/Deep Battle is literally the most misunderstood doctrine of all time, though it's kinda understandable, especially since HoI4 players are just common people who were bought in by pop culture.
And Paradox also in the blame by it by putting such a misleading name & description for it, even though by practice it is fairly well simulated.
Just because "you put bodies in the frontline" it doesnt mean what u see is that Enemy at the Gates charge trope that you see, it is purely a myth, misinterpretation of historical document, & antagonistic if i want to be very blunt, if anything Deep Battle is waaaaayy more manpower efficient compared to US's "Individual Replacement System" which by practice is closer to a human wave tactic we've seen in WW2, even historical records from Soviet officials & Western observer agreed.
If US were in Soviet's place back in 1939 they would lost more than 5x the casualties that were inflicted by Germans to Soviets, and lets be real, Germans looked down on the western front, their strongest most elite units are all on the eastern front, Battle of the Bulge is a great example of what a fraction of true fighting capability of German Eastern Unit, its terrifying, & the allies barely able to deal with it, and that's exactly what the soviets are fighting against since 1939.
In gameplay perspective, Deep Battle/Mass Assault fills the most amount of frontline, has lowest trickleback, great supply buffs, & almost immune to Blitzkrieg, in my experience Mass Assault is the most effective & reliable way to play tinier states with absolutely no industrial capabilities, if you're US or Germany u can absolutely use Superior firepower purely because of the factory output, but your frontline is as barren as the no man's land, and if ur manpower is low then they just refuse to fight.
At this point "Human Waves" are just slanders, its almost purely myth, and if i want to use fair standards, the Allies in WW1 does more 'human waves' than the Chinese in the entirity of 2nd Sino Japanese War.
and in game perspective, Grand Battleplan IS the human wave tactic.
Hey man! Could you give me any advice on how to play with Mass assault doctrine? How to create my divisions?
You say a lot of nothing. Instead you could've just pointed out that the a more accurate name for the human wave style attacks that get memed on so much are more properly called "recon in force" by sending in the penal battalions to die in droves and nothing where they were dying the fastest Soviet high command could figure out where the enemy was weakest breaking the German lines open to encircle the hard points to be defeated in detail or merely contained and left to starve.
It was a rather pragmatic approach to warfare that coping commies somehow fail to properly defend as they spend too much time sucking down German propaganda and smack talking the allies.
The Germans were not super men they merely had the benefit of breathtaking incompetence in their enemies and stealing the homework of Percy Hobard's homework about the future of modern warfare.
Once their enemies removed their heads from their collective orfaces they promptly got their German weiners flattened.
It is funny video,but when you choose mass assault doctrine left,it will be Step Tan synergy
Me a Superior Firepower enjoyer looking at my 10:1 K/D ratio and the enemy being unable to advance becaue their divs are now at 10 % strength.
Capital, vodka , soveit the bear
what's the song in 1:12 called?
Prussian Glory
3:02 Mda, the creator of the movie obviously capitalists forgot to give money to finish the historical weapons in the frame.
GLORY TO THE FRIST MAN TO FALL!
I love MW because everything is fast af (especially tanks). Its not about having the best stats overall but by just being faster and creating encirclements by just being fast af, securing victory points and supply hubs faster than the enemy can redeploy. Something in my monkey brain just experiences satisfaction when the plan worked out. Major debuff is that MW infantry is in comparison very bad
It is fun, but I watched 2 years ago film about blitzkrieg(like in this video), and first time won the Soviet for German
3:40-3:47 I thought that telephone pole was an orthodox cross for sec lol
It looks like that's intentional
@ that doesn’t make any sense
I use superior firepower for infertry asult while mobile warfare for tanks grand battle plan for defence and mass assault never
I was Like please do the howitzer Clip with preuß.. yes He did preußens gloria
as a person who never uses tanks only artilerry infantry superior firepower is KING🥱
because the AI is terrible. fight real players and you would get obliterated. infantry artillery is horrible. NEVER use artillery unless its for marines, its never worth the IC cost to stats ratio.
@exsolverez i dont care
@@NctLenovobilgisayar Based response, W King
@@NctLenovobilgisayar Artillery are ranged weapons that launch munitions far beyond the range and power of infantry firearms. Early artillery development focused on the ability to breach defensive walls and fortifications during sieges, and led to heavy, fairly immobile siege engines. As technology improved, lighter, more mobile field artillery cannons developed for battlefield use. This development continues today; modern self-propelled artillery vehicles are highly mobile weapons of great versatility generally providing the largest share of an army's total firepower.
US Artillerymen test fire an M777 Lightweight 155-millimeter Howitzer at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms (2005)
Originally, the word "artillery" referred to any group of soldiers primarily armed with some form of manufactured weapon or armour. Since the introduction of gunpowder and cannon, "artillery" has largely meant cannon, and in contemporary usage, usually refers to shell-firing guns, howitzers, and mortars (collectively called barrel artillery, cannon artillery or gun artillery) and rocket artillery. In common speech, the word "artillery" is often used to refer to individual devices, along with their accessories and fittings, although these assemblages are more properly called "equipment". However, there is no generally recognized generic term for a gun, howitzer, mortar, and so forth: the United States uses "artillery piece", but most English-speaking armies use "gun" and "mortar". The projectiles fired are typically either "shot" (if solid) or "shell" (if not solid). Historically, variants of solid shot including canister, chain shot and grapeshot were also used. "Shell" is a widely used generic term for a projectile, which is a component of munitions.
By association, artillery may also refer to the arm of service that customarily operates such engines. In some armies, the artillery arm has operated field, coastal, anti-aircraft, and anti-tank artillery; in others these have been separate arms, and with some nations coastal has been a naval or marine responsibility.
In the 20th century, target acquisition devices (such as radar) and techniques (such as sound ranging and flash spotting) emerged, primarily for artillery. These are usually utilized by one or more of the artillery arms. The widespread adoption of indirect fire in the early 20th century introduced the need for specialist data for field artillery, notably survey and meteorological, and in some armies, provision of these are the responsibility of the artillery arm. The majority of combat deaths in the Napoleonic Wars, World War I, and World War II were caused by artillery.[1] In 1944, Joseph Stalin said in a speech that artillery was "the god of war".[1]
From what movie is that grand battle plan scene
all quiet on the western front
the only reasonis use mobile warfare is since 99% of all my divisions use some sort of motorized equipment / company
Basicly this is how it works (source proven with the trust me bro method)
Mob warfare: i got everything in my nation both industry and men
Sup firepower: i can get industry but i dont have a lot of men i need to focus on well firepower
grand battleplan: im lazy have everything and dont wanna micro when my generals can do it for me and feel a bit nostalgic about the good old days
mass assault: ye i just dont care about my soldiers the motherland is the only thing which must be protected ( and OUR regime if u know u know )
Mobile Warfare is just too good on the offensive even if the AI tries to stack divisions on the frontline, and combined with CAS you'll just reinforce meme them to death.
It's called "superior" firepower for a reason. LONG LIVE THE ARTILLERY!!
2:58 Si se tienen dos soldados por cada bala del enemigo, la victoria esta asegurada 😎
Now do ones for the navy and air doctrines.
Your son is already 12 years old, he is already an adult and a soldier. Your son is 8 years old too. "Weaker user of the mass attack doctrine"
Long live to Astra Militarum Doctrine
Mobile Warfare: MORE TANKSSSSS🗿
Superior Firepower: UNLIMITED POWEERRR 🗿
Grand Battleplan: we’ll just never attack, someone else will 💀💩
Mass Assault: I love scraping the barrel! (Aka what’s an economy)
2:55 I have no idea about HoI4... But what the hell is the one, unarmed soviet in this clip doing? Charging in to fist fight?
It’s mass assault, as the name implies you just throw waves of personnel at the enemy. Essentially he is acting as a human shield of sole sorts, if he can grab a gun he prob will but more likely than not he will just be sent out to die and act as cover for troops behind him. This is all to my understanding though
What is the film of the howitzers?
For me either mobile warfare or superior firepower
''With the lord my protector''
-Karl XII Pfalz-Zweibrücken
И вторая самая играбельная
What was the song in the superior firepower part?
Prussia gloria
@justforrightnow123 thank you so much for asking. I looked for the song for 20 minutes and then looked exactly for this comment and finally found it!
Hola desde Perú, bueno te falto una doctrina que esta en el juego