References: ١- وقال الإمام أحمد : (( الزينة الظاهرة الثياب ، وكل شيء منه عورة ( يعني : المرأة)، حتى الظفر ، ولا نقول في نساء أهل الذمة شيئا)) . سأل الحسن البصري : إنا نبيع القطن ، فيأتينا نساء أهل الذمة ، فنرى شعورهن ؟ فقال الحسن : ليس به بأس . تخريج الدولابي في الكنى. 2- ، قال : «سألت إبراهيم [يعني النخعي] ، قال : فقلت : إنا نبايع العلوج بهذه الكرابيس ، فنرى بطونهن وأشعارهن ، فقال : ليست لهن حرمة» . أخرجه الدوري عن ابن معين في تاريخه (رقم4649) ، قال : «حدثنا يحيى قال حدثنا عبد الرحمن بن مهدى قال حدثنا سفيان عن مستغفر البجلي» ، وهذا إسناد يثبت به النقل عن النخعي . أدركت رَسُول اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ [وعمرت ] ، وكانت تمر فِي الأسواق، وتأمر بالمعروف، وتنهى عَنِ المنكر، وتضرب الناس عَلَى ذلك بسوط كَانَ معها. الاستيعاب في معرفة الأصحاب - ابن عبد البر ٤/١٨٦٣ And in at-Tabaranis al mu´jam al kabir no. 785: قَالَ: رَأَيْتُ سَمْرَاءَ بِنْتَ نَهِيكٍ، وَكَانَتْ قَدْ أَدْرَكَتِ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ: «عَلَيْهَا دِرْعٌ غَلِيظٌ، وَخِمَارٌ غَلِيظٌ، بِيَدِهَا سَوْطٌ تُؤَدِّبُ النَّاسَ، وَتَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ، وَتَنْهَى عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ» Al-Albany authenticates it in الرد المفحم ص ١٥٥.
@@MohammedHijab So brother, if I bring the quotes from the salaf who have the opinion that women's feet are not awrah, it becomes fine for me to share their picture on my X and YT account?
They don't justify you distributing the vision of ' awrah' of women to Muslim masses. They are just about casual, 'sight' of women without an active intentionality. The two cases are completely different (and that too exceptional opinions as you yourself have mentioned). Akhi, accept that you were wrong in this case. Nobody is 100% right. Or reply to my questions in another video. I would love to hear your counters.
@@tarrasbulba4408 why are people surprised that there is no unity in the ummah. Our scholars will never see eye to eye on every fiqh matter. Why keep bringing these issues up instead of moving on with what unites us: the Kalimah
I appreciate how so many in the comments section called them out on their actions. It shows that we don't just follow anyone blindly. May Allah bless and guide each of us.
Brother Muhammed, I have been listening to the references you have mentioned and I have read them and jazakullahu khairan for teaching me and others that the awrah ruling does not fall onto the non-muslim. Therefore, we cannot force them to wear any hijab etc. However, this is completely segregated from the idea of displaying these women on your videos. Interaction with women is halal as long as it does not fall into haram, but that does not justify YOU showing or assisting the production team to showing these women on your videos. Us viewers are not the ones interacting with them so we fall under the ruling of lower our gazes and you are not assisting that at all. You are creating a fitna among your Muslim viewers and there is definitely a way to avoid that. I ask Allah to guide you and the rest of us. And Allah knows best
so we shouldn't leave our house if there are women clothing in bad ways? I mean what he is portraying is not even haram, and if you find it to be haram then you will just not watch it no?
If you are a hijab supporter just like me but is not at all convinced by any of his justifications here and deeply wish him to understand the haqq on this matter like this comment just to let him know .
I really looked up to you both because you represented unapologetic strength as Muslims. But now I find you both here sounding like the average liberal Muslim in the West. Sad times.
Well now you know to not follow based on emotions and actually follow the truthful refutations of these charlatans that were made years ago. If you had an ounce of sincerity you would've read/listened to those refutations years ago, but people like them prey on your vulnerability and lack of knowledge. Wake up now before its too late brother
We disagree with them on this video and this justification. However, they are still our brothers in islam and we shouldn't mock them/Ali. قال الله - تعالى - : *﴿ لا يسخر قوم من قوم ﴾ - سورة الحجرات.*
@@youssefassemzahran9911 You should address this to Ali first when he said, “The religion doesn't belong to your dad or mother!” What brother says such words? Actually, @AbdullahAl-Masoodi2243 is completely correct. Ali Dawah needs Dawah. His sarcastic way of speaking is very strange, to be honest. I wonder if he can accept criticism at all!
@@am99899 I mean he can accept criticism. The problem is that the level of criticism is so weak which is the problem. Ali literally seems to get criticized and mocked frequently, by people that don't rlly know what theyre talking about and have a tunnel vision view of religion. Criticising Ali doesnt mean you have a tunnel view of religion, but when people are willing to mock the likes of shaykh dedu then it's kind of clear who's the problem
You can make the same argument about living in the west lol 😂 very easily the same argument could be living in the west or working side by side women etc
@@Otainment_47 a muslim shouldn't actually move to a kaffir country (if they weren't already born there) unless there's a plausible need. This is a drama, there's no need or urgency to make it with women in revealing clothing.
I swear I hear Ali Dawah insulting his viewers more than he actually gives out Dawah. We know the religion is not for our dad, and it also is not for you to tell us our views are wrong when you’re trying to normalise something we have rejected for hundreds of years. May allah swt guide you.
There’s a difference between seeing a woman in the marketplace not practicing proper hijab and making a woman without hijab accessible to the wider public. Why do we sit in segregation at functions if there’s is so much evidence on men seeing woman in the Islamic world without a hijab? Going out of your way to see and put a kafir without hijab on a platform is crazyyyy
How do you propose bringing people to Islam. Wallahi if I hadn't already become muslim and was thinking about maybe becoming muslim now, then i read the comments of the muslims in these videos i would stay as far away from islam as i could.
@@Vicious12384able we bring people to Islam using halal ways. Using the ways our prophet ﷺ and sahaba used to bring people to Islam. If you think we should bring people close to Islam using ways that are relatable to them, then aren't you saying that the way of the prophet ﷺ wasn't the optimal way? That halal ways aren't enough, we must use haram too? Aren't you saying that ways allowed by Allah aren't enough to bring people to Islam? The jahiliya days of makkah involved almost every promiscuity you can think of right now. There were uncovered women at that time as well, and the youth were attracted to them as well. Musical instruments were also popular at the time. Free mixing was just as rampant. Did our prophet ﷺ use any of these to spread Islam? Did the sahaba reject Islam because oh no, it isn't being spread by relatable means? Haram can never be justified and is out of the occasion. Alhamdulillah you're a Muslim now my dear brother, I'm really happy to hear that. May Allah keep your and mine hearts steady on Iman and hidayah. Ameen ya rab.
The debate here is not an easy one, because one can say “it’s haram, full stop” and one can justify it by explaining the end goals behind the project. HOWEVER, I think, the one simple question we should ask is: was is avoidable? Could this project have been done without women or at least blurring the awrah of these women? YES. If it was avoidable, then it should have been. Being part of western society and being surrounded by non Muslim uncovered women is unavoidable if one lives and works in the west. But filming and sharing their image, is a choice. After all only allah knows the real intentions and may Allah swt guide us all.
Sorry, but I have to disagree. If at the time of the sahaba, men and women were talking, was this done outside? Or in a segregated place? Was the 'chat' broadcast to the world? Were the women 'beautified' and shown to the world? ( muslim women in the videos have definitely got makeup one, plucked eye brows etc) this is shown to the muslim women of the world, and they may interpret this 'code' as being halal and the men watching may have different thoughts. The sheikh who brought his daughter into the room, im sorry, but was a mahram man present? Yes, therefore, you can't use that to justify. I feel that you are so desperate to find something in the hadith literature to support what you are doing, that you are using weak hadith to justify, and they are not even the same scneario. If you were debating a christian, and you told him his bible is corrupt and you advised the Christian to follow the authentic tradition of jesus pbuh, but then he turns around and says 'you should do the same' Deep down, i can see you know what you are doing is not right, but finding an excuse to justify it.
This is the first comment I ever made on RUclips in my 15 years of watching: I used to be inspired by you brother Mohammed hijab, perhaps still am. But brother, please stay on the right path. The messages you are sending is very confusing to us.
Akhi i won't even get into the technicalities of the fiqh but as a well-known respected da'ee, you have a duty to safeguard your honour/dignity more than the average muslim. You can spin this however you want but bottom line is this sort of work would've been seen as something beneath the people dawah/knowledge. You're better than this. Also i find it ironic that you hold such lenient views on freemixing/awrah yet you dont apply this on your own womenfolk. I recall Ali censoring the image and voice of his wife on a video. So where's the consistency?
@HeadshotKillaa what's wrong with you? You either are idolizing these daees or don't understand islam. Attacking the brother who commented doesn't invalidate his argument
@@RazorStan Perhaps I'm cautious of the recent phenomenon of actual children and youth challenging daees / those who've dedicated their lives to propagating the deen. Brothers will go online and completely anonymously defame another brother who has placed himself in the public eye for the sake of Allah, over a difference of opinion issue. Calling them "dayooths". Wallahi I feel even if they knew the implications of this word they'd still use it. Without questioning their active p*rnhub subscriptions, these anonymous brothers satisfy their ego and play sheikh for a few hours online, without seeing the damage they're doing to those who only stand up for them and their future.
Hence why Muslims are getting beaten up and destroyed everywhere. Non-Muslims are the ones bearing the flag of freedom for Palestine while we sit at home advising each other on music and "awrah."
@@Freestatue99 watched a part of it, I don't like listening to him anyway. I saw the evidence he gave. He basically became a liberal Muslim. You can try blindly following someone like him, but you need to be honest to admit he is wrong just like everyone else can see. Everyone is seeing through it.
@musfiqurkashem8614 , you didn't even watched the full video so you have absolutely no right to speak. Talking about liberal Muslim while Hijab is the one who defending the Muslim world from liberalism for more than a decade is kinda funny.
Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-'As reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying: Verily, Allah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the people but He takes away knowledge by taking away the scholars, so that when He leaves no learned person, people turn to the ignorant as their leaders; then they are asked to deliver religious verdicts and they deliver them without knowledge, they go astray, and lead others astray.
A little advice with my weak english look at this beautiful hadith reported: I went to Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and he asked me, "Have you come to inquire about piety?" I replied in the affirmative. Then he said, "Ask your heart regarding it. Piety is that which contents the soul and comforts the heart, and sin is that which causes doubts and perturbs the heart, even if people pronounce it lawful and give you verdicts on such matters again and again. From my perspective as female if you want to establish light and purity in your heart low youre gaze
So that means we as a muslim allowed to see non muslim women’s belly or hair in casual communicating manner with them as long as we as a muslim men aren’t attractive towards thier feminine beauty!
Well you’re not meant to obviously stare at it. But in a public domain, where such women might be unavoidably present or you may need to encounter. Just use a bit of common sense.
No just because public display of awrah orbsuvh is happening doesnt justify mislims being allowed to look at it. These are very different my brother @SupermanOG
@@yusufrashid8875 I’m not saying it should be looked at. But what I’m saying is that in a public space, where such women may unavoidably be present, then you may inadvertently look and see it. Point being, men should then not look again / stare or look with a wrong intention. Unless you’re choosing to live a life like a hermit, then being in the presence of this is unavoidable. That’s largely the point hijab was making too.
@@SupermanOGmaybe they don't understand "Let Allah be The Judge" in situations like this. It's like Haram Police, the more they learn the more they become judgemental towards other Muslim, not understanding. Bigger problem for the ummat are forgotten.
my main issue is brother, if one of these women decide to cover up what will we do? The only possibility would be to censor the film if you don't wanna delete it. One possibility may be to say that the woman take on the responsibility themselves and we delete or censor the videos but there will still be copies out there.
There’s no need for Ali in this video! Even with technicalities nobody will say this engagement with uncovered women is necessary so forget about the look of desire etc! Would you put your mum or sister or daughter in in such an environment
@@saifklee178 I’m not defending harām ! Furthermore being on RUclips isn’t necessarily harām think before just saying anything just because people you look up to are called out
What we know from qur an and sunnah. Is to "Lower your gaze" Even as we knew the enemies of rasullullah sallallahu alaihi wa asallam, tried to use promisquise women in the battle of badr - i bieleve it to be the battle of badr correct me if i am wrong. Akhi what is wrong with your affair at the moment is that you have invested time, sweat and hard work into this movie of yours, however you appraoch in the wrong manner. This is how the shaytan plays with people. Because now you know what you show in the movie is blatantly harram. And because you dont want that hard work to be for nothing, this is where the shaytan makes you his victim and then go on to justify harram, just like the thousands of muslims who have fallen into the hands of shaytan in this manner. Akhi, think of the day of qyammat. Showing the awrah is against the command of allah. And you do this openly, freely casually. Do you not comprehend that this is a sin that not only is done openly, but intended to be done openly to alot of people? What would the nabi saw say if he witnesses what your doing? Look we know islam is growing, and growing rapidly. - that is enough. That will serfice for us muslims. Yes continue the dawah. BUT DO NOT IMITATE THE DISBIELEVERS!!!!!!!! do not use their instruments, their tools, there ways to make our ways easier, it is their way. Not the way of muslims. Because they are dead, we are alive. We have no need for it. Shaytan plays with people like this. "Islam is growing rapidly so how can we spice it up abit?" And then you want to do more and more, be more ambigous all for the sake of boosting the dawah even though at the cost of bringing and supporting a great fitnah. This is very very and i mean very greedy now. LEAVE IT TO ALLAH. Leave it to him, normal dawah is enough, debates is enough. Even Jihad is more than enough. But wanting to be like hollywood, and be careless in the showing of awrah, and saying it is now justified? You are now sounding like all the munafikeen who are one point were great muslims, but fell to the wispers of shaytan. Protect yourself from this akhi hijab and akhi ali. For the sake of allah, protect yourself. May allah open the perception of reasoning for you both and a glimps into to the error of this way of dawah, as this can cause one to fall away from the religion. Ameen.
أخي محمد حجاب انك في مكانة علمية و دعوية و في موقع رفعك الله فيه فلا تفعل ما يمكن ان يجعلك تهبط من مكانتك لا تبرر اذا احتجت للتبرير فإن قلبك غير منشرح لهذا الامر بداية انك تحمل هموم الأمة و تمثلنا في اماكن كثيرة و تدافع عن الحق فلا تضع نفسك في موضع الريبة أو المدافع إن لك تقديرا في قلوبنا و أسأل الله أن يجعلك دائما علي الصراط المستقيم
الحمدلله على كل حال للأسف ما توقعتها منه أنه يضع نفسه في موضع الشك أبدًا وحتى واثق من صحبته سليمة وسمعتهم طيبة ولكن قل آمين يارب أن اللي بيطالعونه ماينظرون في وجيه وشعور النساء أو أي من عوراتهن ولا يجيه ذنوب منها بل حسنات لأنه قد يجذب الضالين الكفارأو الجاهلين والله يحوله إلى خير ونهر جاري حسنات لا سيئات
وصراحة اللي قهرني أنه تكلم يقول أن أحمد رحمه عليه الله كان صارم مع العلم قال ما وافق آية 31 النور ﴿ وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ۖ وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ ۖ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ أَوِ التَّابِعِينَ غَيْرِ أُولِي الْإِرْبَةِ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ أَوِ الطِّفْلِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يَظْهَرُوا عَلَىٰ عَوْرَاتِ النِّسَاءِ ۖ وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِن زِينَتِهِنَّ ۚ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ﴾ قال جل جلاله إلا ما ظهر منها ولم يقل ما أظهرن شف الفرق لو قال ما أظهرن يعني عمدًا المرأة كشفته ولكن ما ظهر يعني انكشف دون أن تكشفه وقال جماعة من الصحابة منهم مجاهد ومقاتل وإذا ما خاب ظني ابن العباس قالوا أنها الثياب التي تظهر ولا تظهرها المرأة وفيه أدلة نقل كثير غير كحديث عائشة عن الركبان وهم في الكعبة أسدلة إحدانا جلبابها من رأسها على وجهها وأم سلمة نقلت عن حال الصحابيات ونساء الأنصار بعد آية الحجاب في سورة الأحزاب 59 ووصفت كالغرابيب السود وأيضًا ابن عباس في تفسيره لها قال أمر الله نساء المؤمنين إذا خرجن من بيوتهن في حاجة أن يغطين وجيههن من فوق رؤوسهن إلى آخر ما قال على العموم لو نأخذها بالعقل كيف لا يكون الوجه زينة وأنتم بكرامة القدم زينة ولا وحتى في الآية نفسها في سورة نور ذكر الضرب بالرجل فنعم كلها عورة وش المشكلة وبعدين يقول نغطي الكافرات لا لاتغطيهم ياخي بس احجبهم حاول ما تخليهم يستعملون المستحضرات إذا أمكن أقل شيء لا تبرر وقول نعم خطأ وأنا أجازف وحاول في المتابعين تنصحهم تجيب أدلة لغض البصر مو العكس جلطني ويقول أن الناس تشوف النساء فخلاص عادي ما فيه مشكلة دامه ظاهر في كل مكان لا تكمل على أخوانك يقول الرسول عليه السلام بعد ما أتو الناس برجل قد شرب خمرًا قال اضربوه فمنهم ضرب بيده ومنهم بثوبه ومنهم بالنعال فقال أحدهم أخزاه الله كم يؤتى به فقال عليه السلام لا تعينوا الشيطان على أخيكم وآخر شيء معليش أطلت صوت المرأة ليس بحرام ولا جدالها أو نقاشها شريطة أن لا يكون هناك خلوة والمرأة بكامل حجابها (أكيد أتكلم إذا كانت مسلمة) وليست متعطرة والرجل ساتر عورته ولا يلين قوله ولا هي تخضع في قولها وقولهم قول معروف يعني في أمر مهم والأمر الذي جاؤوا إليه ويغض الرجل عنها وتغض هي عنه فكيف لعاقل أن يقول بعد هذا أن أحدهما سيفتن بالثاني
Nice discussion brothers. What I would like to kindly add is that when you leave your house, you are in no control of what happens outside, similarly to the scholars you have quoted on people doing trade, which is necessity for livelihood and whoever comes to their place of business, is of no control to them. I do agree that we need dawah films, documentaries to get our youth back to Islam as you have rightly said, 95-100% is watching Hollywood, Netflix and unfortunately getting corrupted. Full steams ahead for the films and documentaries, however as the contents displayed are at your control, this is where the main controversy will be..
So they force hijāb on the non-Muslims is what you are suggesting? 😂😂😂 That wouldn't even make any sense in the film/series. That would be more a meme than effective da'wa.
We cannot make compelling media if it doesn’t reflect reality. Mohamed hijab is being practical, all the people criticising him went through multiple steps where non Muslim uncovered women appeared in ads and thumbnails just to accuse MH of spreading immorality. Then they go back to Netflix or whatever, it’s like people have lost their minds!
You're creating divisions among your viewers by engaging things in the gray area. No urgency whatsoever to make this drama series or whatever you called it, you're just too drunk for being a "celebrity" for too long. It's not too late to correct your way now.
@@user-op8fg3ny3j The earth being round isn't common sense, it is rather something that is learned. I'd argue common sense is what we know from birth. Regardless I don't see how this has to do with the issue here.
Brother hijab I love for you sake of Allah AJW. You are one of those da'ii who brought back millions of muslim youth like me in from haram path of secularism. May allah swt bless you and guide us. But akhi lately you are promoting CLEAR Haram even from naked eyes. Pls brothers don't do this. Fear Allah! Fear Allah,!Fear Allah. This only a nasheaha from your brother.
@@AshrafAnam they asked Hasan Al Basri (ra) because they were earning a living. One is necessity and the other is...? You think Hasan Al basri (ra) would permit making movies with the kuffar like this...?
There is so much that is astounding and could be said about this segment. Both speakers in this video are guilty of what they accuse their critics of, pertaining to how textual evidence are being thrown into the mix without looking into how scholars understood these texts or how can they be reconciled with other textual evidence that have stated opposite views. Let's grant that those quoted texts are indeed sound and have been stated, it's key to note that there are countless evidence that indicate otherwise (statements of the very scholars quoted like Al Hassan Al Basri) especially on the issue of free-mixing. Nonetheless, this is a matter that is to be looked into by Specialists in the fields of Fiqh and Usul. The approach of both in the video, is not how these matters are to be addressed from a scholarly point of view, especially that scholars are being quoted and frankly neither one have displayed a hint of scholarship in their discourse but they have done what every laymen does, quote evidence. It is one thing to reference and quote evidence, but it is a completely different game to be able to extract relevant rulings from the evidence to the issue at hand. Not to mention, how these statements could be misunderstood by the laity and present as means by which certain things are deemed lawful.
I was on the fence leaning towards the stricter side on this (in opinion), but the ahadith you shared, even though I'd heard some of them before already, along with your reasoning, definitely swayed me. However, there was some reasoning I found flawed; regarding the line between different inconveniences, there may be some arbitrariness, but I think the qualitative difference between the examples Hijab shared is that in one, you are not yourself displaying the woman, you simply have a likelihood of seeing them by going to the park, whereas here, you are directly participating in it. That said, your case didn't hinge on this, so I was still convinced, but I do especially wonder about if and when some of these non-Muslim girls convert to Islam in the future and start observing hijab. Some of those ahadith were very eye-opening, though. I do agree that one mistake you can fall into is getting your right and wrong from whatever version of Islam you happen to be brought up in or trained in instead of evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and that's no different than liberals whose morality just comes from the society around them.
Evidence from the Quran: (قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِمْ وَيَحْفَظُوا فُرُوجَهُمْ ذَلِكَ أَزْكَى لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ خَبِيرٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ) النور/30 Evidence from the Sunnah: روى مسلم (2159) عن جرير بن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال: (سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ نَظَرِ الْفُجَاءَةِ فَأَمَرَنِي أَنْ أَصْرِفَ بَصَرِي). وروى أبو داود (2151) والترمذي (2777) عَنِ بُرَيْدَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لِعَلِىٍّ - رضي الله عنه- : ( يَا عَلِىُّ لاَ تُتْبِعِ النَّظْرَةَ النَّظْرَةَ فَإِنَّ لَكَ الأُولَى وَلَيْسَتْ لَكَ الآخِرَةُ ) وحسنه الألباني في صحيح أبي داود روى البخاري (5240) عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ، قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: لاَ تُبَاشِرُ المَرْأَةُ المَرْأَةَ، فَتَنْعَتَهَا لِزَوْجِهَا كَأَنَّهُ يَنْظُرُ إِلَيْهَا Evidence from the Sahabah: قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ». The nonexistence of Khilaf on this matter: قال ابن القطان الفاسي في إحكام النظر في أحكام النظر :"(105) - مسألة: فإن كانت هذه الأجنبية الحرة كافرة، هل هي في جواز نظر الرجال إليها كالمؤمنة؟ أو أقل حرمة؟: يظهر في ذلك مثل المؤمنة، ولا أعرف خلاف ذلك، وإنما وجب أن تكون مثلها لتساويها في تحريك الشهوة، وتعرض الناظر إليها للفتنة، بل ربما كانت النفس بما تعلم من (هوى)".
Regarding the narration from الحسن البصري 1) It was only narrated by الدولابي, who was criticized by the scholars of الجرح والتعديل. جاء في ميزان الاعتدال للذهبي ص459: «قال ابن عدي: ابن حماد متهم فيما قاله في نعيم بن حماد لصلابته في أهل الرأي. وقال حمزة السهمي: سألت الدارقطني عن الدولابي فقال: تكلموا فيه لما تبين من أمره الأخير. وقال ابن يونس: كان الدولابي من أهل الصنعة حتى التصنيف، وكان يضعف». وجاء في لسان الميزان ص506: «وعاب عليه ابن عَدِي تعصبه المفرط لمذهبه حتى قال في الحديث الذي رواه أبو حنيفة عن منصور بن زاذان عن الحسن عن معبد الجهني عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم (في القهقهة): معبد هذا هو ابن هوذة الذي ذكره البخاري في تاريخه. ⦗٥٠٧⦘ قال ابن عَدِي: وهذا الذي قاله غير صحيح وذلك أن معبد بن هوذة أنصاري فكيف يكون جهنيا؟ ومعبد الجهني معروف ليس بصحابي وما حمل الدولابي على ذلك إلا ميله لمذهبه». 2) Another issue with the إسناد فضل بن يونس أبو شعبة ليس له إلا هذه الرواية وإذا كان التوثيق من الدولابي فلا يساوي شيئاً وكل من لهم هذا الاسم المفضل بن يونس ولهم تراجم في الكتب ليس لهم هذه الكنية ولو فرضنا أنه ثقة فهل أدرك غالباً القطان ؟ هذا محل شك فلا يوجد أحد اسمه المفضل بن يونس يروي عن غالب القطان إلا في هذا الأثر فقط. 3) And this opposes what البخاري narrated قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ». 4) If it was authentic, it is specific for temporarily seeing the hair of who you're selling to. This does not apply to showing and presenting uncovered women to the masses "for dawah", let alone showing women who uncover more than their hair and who wear tight clothes.
Regarding سمراء بنت نهيك: 1) Assuming it's authentic, she was old. As ابن عبد البر said, "she lived a long life". And she did nothing except enjoin good and forbid evil in the market, a place everyone had to go to. Neither does this apply to those who aren't old, nor does it apply to unnecessary free-mixing elsewhere. 2) She could be from the إماء, because walking in the markets was from habits of the إماء and not the حرائر, which is mentioned by عمر May الله be pleased with him. جاء في مصنف عبد الرزاق ص135: ٥٠٦٢ - عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتَ أَبِي عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَتْهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ رَأَى وَهُوَ يَخْطُبُ النَّاسَ أَمَةً خَرَجَتْ مِنْ بَيْتِ حَفْصَةَ تَجُوسُ النَّاسَ مُلْتَبِسَةً لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ، فَلَمَّا انْصَرَفَ دَخَلَ عَلَى حَفْصَةَ ابْنَةِ عُمَرَ، فَقَالَ: «مَنِ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي خَرَجَتْ مِنْ عِنْدِكِ تَجُوسُ الرِّجَالَ؟» قَالَتْ: تِلْكَ جَارِيَةٌ، جَارِيَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ قَالَ: «فَمَا يَحْمِلُكِ أَنْ تُلْبِسِي جَارِيَةَ أَخِيكِ لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ؟ فَقَدْ دَخَلْتُ عَلَيْكِ، وَلَا أَرَاهَا، إِلَّا حُرَّةً فَأَرَدْتُ أَنْ أُعَاقِبَهَا». قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: «وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة». Making this irrelevant to the case trying to be justified. 3) Some weakened the إسناد, because there's no known سماع of حيى بن أبي سُلَيم from سمراء بنت نهيك. References: جاء في كتاب إظهار الحق والصواب في حكم الحجاب ص703: الشبهة السابعة والعشرون: استدلالهم بأن سمراء بنت نهيك وكانت تؤدب الناس، وتأمر بالمعروف، فعن يحيى بن أبي سليم قال: «رَأَيْتُ سَمْرَاءَ بنتَ نَهِيكٍ، وَكَانَتْ قَدْ أَدْرَكَتِ النَّبِيَّ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -:عَلَيْهَا دِرْعٌ غَلِيظٌ، وَخِمَارٌ غَلِيظٌ، بِيَدِهَا سَوْطٌ تُؤَدِّبُ النَّاسَ، وَتَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ، وَتَنْهَى عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ». هذه القصة رواها الطبراني في الكبير، وهي ضعيفة؛ لأن يحيى بن أبي سُلَيم لا يعلم له سماع من سمراء بنت نهيك، بل لم يعاصرها، وإنما سمع منها أبو بلج الصغير واسمه جارية بن بلج، وهو مجهول، وقد حسن بعضهم هذه القصة بسبب حصول اشتباه بين أبي بلج يحيى بن سُليم، ويقال ابن أبي سليم، وبين أبي بلج جارية بن بلج، فظنوا أن الأول هو الثاني، وليس كذلك كما سبق. فالقصة ضعيفة من جهة سندها. وأيضاً يرد عليهم بما قاله فضل إلهي: «لم يرد فيه أن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أو أحد الخلفاء الراشدين - رضي الله عنهم - ولاها على حسبة السوق غاية ما في الأمر أنها كانت تقوم بالاحتساب في السوق، وقيام أحد بذلك في السوق، لا يدل على تعيينه والياً على حسبة السوق». وأيضاً على فرض صحتها فالمرأة المذكورة كبيرة السن، ودعاة الاختلاط يبحثون عن الشابات، ويبحثون عمن تقبل الاختلاط، لا عمن تأتي لتحارب منكرات الاختلاط وغيرها، فلو كانت هذه المرأة حية لأدبت بسوطها أصحاب الاختلاط؛ لأنهم يتاجرون بالنساء، ويتخذونهن متعة رخيصة. انتهى وجاء في كتاب كشف الغمة عن أدلة الحجاب في الكتاب والسنة ص276: وهذا يشهد أن سمراء بنت نهيك كانت من الإماء؛ لأن المشي في الأسواق كان من عادة الإماء دون الحرائر، كما أسلفنا مما ورد عن عمر - رضي الله عنه - (لما رأى أمة خرجت من بيت حفصة تجوس الناس ملتبسة لباس الحرائر، فدخل على حفصة ابنة عمر فقال: "من المرأة التي خرجت من عندك تجوس الرجال"؟ قالت تلك جارية عبد الرحمن. قال: "فما يحملك أن تلبسي جارية أخيك لباس الحرائر، فقد دخلت عليك ولا أراها إلا حرّة فأردت أن أعاقبها". قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة. كما أنها كانت من القواعد يشهد لذلك قول ابن عبد البر السابق (سمراء بنت نهيك الأسدية أدركت رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وعمّرت). انتهى فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة »ومدبرة.
@@personalprofile1939 not only. There was some evidence not just about showing but even touching; the narration about the prophet allowing the woman to lead him by the hand, for example.
Put your hand on the heart and ask yourself akhi, if prophet ﷺ was to see your series, would he have approved it? You're fooling no one but your own self akhi. Please stop it
Actually there's no way to know what the Prophet (saw) would think. You couldn't for a fact say by Allah whether the Prophet saw would approve of it or not because we don't actually know because he is not with us anymore
@@the_weal_mawa you don't know of his character and his teachings? Based on his teachings and based on how he lived his life, based on how he reacted in every circumstance of his life you couldn't say that?
@@JoBlogz Mohammed Hijab has always been less orthodox than you think, you just haven't peeled back the layers enough. I advise you to read the books of scholars of the past regarding controversial manners that come up in his 'apologetics', you will find alot of disparity.
Whether you make the music with your mouth or instruments, it's still music. The same sound is made, and the same effect is there... May Allah guide us all. Ameen.
How can you be convinced beautiful sounds in nature are Haram. Birds sing, water sings, wind sings, leaves sing.. Should we be deaf? Humans like everything else in nature love to make and listen to melodies. I believe it's only Haram when the words and meanings are Haram. Like degenerate and satanic western music.
That is why the scholars that deem instruments to be permissible actually agree with the strictest opinion that there is fundamentaly to difference between vocals and instruments
From personal insight, the people who get inflamed about something are, generally, guilty of it. Wear the hat if it fits. I appreciate brother Hijab and co are taking this criticism seriously. As someone interested in the use of media, I too am conflicted when it comes to portrayal of people accurate enough. Wouldn't make sense to blur people in a movie. I guess we'll have to do what we are supposed to do in real life: lower our gaze. If the brothers would take a constructive criticism, I would say publish that kind of content from a different account. Just so the message doesn't get lost in the noise or it doesn't contaminate bulk of your good work. May Allah keep us all on the straight path.
@@fysmhmd7029 brother, sinning is one thing, but normalizing and justifying - even a sinner recognises its nefariousness and feels defensive about it, especially when the the perpetrator is someone we hold in high esteem and see as a role model of sorts.
Chian, I'm starting to think Thomas is like a genie. He only appears when you rub the lamp... which, in this case, is our collective desire for more Thomas! Make it happen!"
I didn't see the video, but here is a verse from the quran I want to share so that people remember, we are all sinners, and the best of sinners are those who repent, may Allah guide us all: surah 24 verse 30: ˹O Prophet!˺ Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their chastity. That is purer for them. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what they do
To be Honest, I am confused on this matter. But I know one thing there are people who are more conservative than Sahabas & some are more liberal than Liberals & Islam is right in the middle.May Allah guide me to it. And we definitely need movies to promote Islam. We need our people in media & films. Its a great tool to do Dawah. Ertugrul, Osman & other Islamic series had helped people to find Islam even though it did contain some haram elements. There are stories where people get guidance from Music festival, Night club. Let's wait & see what the series is about. I hope it is beneficial..
i have under estimated how much knowledge you guys know about the deen and how and where to approach it from. respect and love from Oman, please continue making the world a better place and making it easier for non-muslims to approach our beloved religion
13:00 I disagree with you. When they saw the hair of the women it was like a small part. U know culturally. All women would cover their hair. Muslims being most strict. I was sitting my dad once. And i think the video was about the very first CCTV camera in a street in europe. Black and white. We noticed something. Over half the women who passed by the camera actually were covering their hair. Obviously not like Hijab. But u know. Putting a scarf on their head. Even of it shows the hair from some parts. Pretty sure thats what they meant 1200 years ago. Which stayed up until slowly removed as we see in europe today. Everyday they take off something😂
@Recker1125 If someone wants to object then answer his points: 1) Discuss the evidences hijab presented in the video 2) then discuss the practicality of your view and to what extent you yourself dont apply it and why, can that same principle not then be extended? If not why not?
@@Recker1125 brother it’s about the situation though, they were talking about during trading and stuff so like normal life situations where you r there for the purpose of for example trading and not for lust. Porn is only watched cuz of lust. But i get yourbpoint but the think is that how far can you actually take this for example because of this no muslim should go to the park for a walk or to the mall cuz there will be women uncovered.
COMPLETELY AGREE 💯. And I have believed, ever since watching the 1977 movie _The Message: The Story of Islam_ , in the power of motion picture. It is a tremendously powerful medium that can shape minds, change perspectives and spread any message on an wide scale. Islamic films and series (I highly recommend Payitaht Abdülhamid, a massively important Turkish series on our last Caliph and his hard fight against Zionism and secularism and protecting the Umma and defending the stronghold of Islām) have always greatly impacted me in my Islamic life. Alhamdu-lillāh. 😊
Dawah is ibaadah and you cant not introduce your own dawah straying from the messengers, the kufar in the time of many prophets and the prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) in particular they use to have gatherings where music was played and dancing girls were brought this was prevelant in the time of the prophet (ﷺ) and other prophets , they didnt utilise these gatherings to call to Allah سبحانه وتعالى, just because something is prevelant does not mean it should be utilised for dawah like the examples mentioned in the video like films and netflix series etc.... stick to what the prophets of Allah سبحانه وتعالى did they called to islam in a uniform and honourable way across generations.
Well done brother Hijab in taking the bull by the horns and tackling the issues of our time, issues that pertain to not just muslim youth living in the west, but across the globe. Utilising this medium is genius. May Allah (SWT) preserve you.
What are you thanking him for ? To make it easier for Muslims who felt guilty looking at women ,now feel like he is doing something halal. After watching this video so many men will not not try to lower their gaze like they did before. "It's hard to live not looking at women ,that's why i will look at women and not even try"
@@Abu_Tuesday I am here in Palestine with both my Christian & Muslim brothers, and I have the right to say it is haram! Even for us Christians arguing with women is haram, so why your guys having conversations with women in the park on theological matters, it is not their place!
I'm a bit confused. Isn't the concept of seeing women's hair and neck the same as looking at a nudist? Obviously looking at a naked person is far worse. But the idea of both is that the women's awrah is seen but just alot more when it's a naked person compared to one jist showing hair and neck. Which then begs the question, where is the limit to how much of a women awrah we can see? Or can we see even any?
@@IA67676 Mohammad Hijab won't be able to be consistent. Check my replies to the pinned comment. I translated the refutation to all of his points بفضل الله.
i am sorry i dont really understand, are u justifying doing haram? i can understand doing haram and accepting it was better than justifying (but my first lang isnt english i am sure i missundertand and i am at the 6:45 anyways, long way to go until end)
..."people look at Islam like it's a black and white box" Brother. Truth and falsehood, is black and white. It's one, or the other. How can you even try and justify your haram promoting by using this type of thinking? Alhamdulillah for many of us Muslims, TRUTH is CLEAR from FALSEHOOD! Let us make Du'a to keep our brothers guided on the correct path. We can't shun them, we must help keep all our brothers and sisters on the Sunnah!
If that's the case that means you've never watched him Its amusingly this is a throwaway account as you attack him He always privately does advice, omar suleiman was private advice until he found he hadn't changed it took him years before he advised him publicly
The incidents you provide of suhabah like ali dawah mentions about a suhabi who took a guest to his house for food.. was that before or after the hukum of purdah? We all know the hukum of purdah came very later.
Let me break it to you: Muslims have been using musical instruments (the oud especially) throughout the entire history of Islam. Even Sultan Harūn Ar-Rashīd used to play the guitar but also used to spend a whole lot of time studying the Qur'an. I guess most of us are stupid sinners
Clearly am not much aware of this situation the brothers are talking about but listening to this video i had many doubts in mind. So what i understand from this video is that the non Muslims are using music and movies to influence people so we also as Muslims also need to match what they doing or do something closer to that. Islam doesn't is perfect and the religion is growing without movies or music we dont need to stoop so low to spread the deen. Also, this situation, seeing the hair of the opposite sex's hair, mainly women we aren't allowed looking too long you can have the first glance and turn away but if its in a movie or documentary it will be like more than once but Allah knows best am giving them the benefit of the doubt and look into this thing more inshaalah
13:10 one is selling to earn a living and one is making a film to do what, exactly? It's laughable. You two are slipping and I think Brother Hijab himself knows it.
Disappointed they didn't go into full detail with woman's awrah. With everything that is said here, does that make it okay to look at girls/women then? When proposing for marriage can you look at her body/curves in order to to see what entices you to marry her like what the prophet S.A.W. said?
You can look at a woman's body for marriage, there is nothing wrong with that per the hadith you mentioned which establishes the exception from lowering the gaze. With that said, what Mohammed Hijab is saying regarding looking at any random woman isn't ok.
If someone wants to object then answer his points: 1) Discuss the evidences hijab presented in the video 2) then discuss the practicality of your view and to what extent you yourself dont apply it and why, can that same principle not then be extended? If not why not?
Wealth is a trial for the Muslim nation. Ka'b bin 'Iyad (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, "Verily, there is a Fitnah (trial) for every nation and the trial for my nation (or Ummah) is wealth". At- Tirmidhi, who classified it as Hadith Hasan Sahih.
Allot of these comments haven’t finished quarter of the video pleas don’t comment if u haven’t seen his reasoning ur words will be counted He gave his reasons this religion is the religion of reasons u do things according to reasons and evidence
07:42 "For every time i look at her you get a sin BLA BLA BLA..." Mohammed that's not how you talk about Muslims who are trying to be careful with Allah's orders you two are mocking them in the most childish way and that's not how you talk about the rulings that has been said by the scholars of Islam throughout history!! and please catch your worshipers in the comments they are attacking us thinking we are just criticizing you because we are "haters" which is funny and not true.
Is cartoons allowed? Some say its allowed if its for a islamic reason, so a kids education cartoon, EVEN though drawing humans or aninals is considered haraam?
yeah i think we as muslism need to have a balanced view and an open minded mentality. the cult type mentality is going to hurt us in long run anyway..... i think extreme conservatism that has dripped into muslims psychology in present day is the reason people are becoming secular, because they see look this type of mindset will not function.... so if we show them that we can disagree but still function that is when we will succed as an ummah
I blame modern salafism for this close minded and rigid understanding of Shariah. As an arab I can tell you these saudi Scholars used to say TV, Bicycle, Camera, Football, and many other things were "Haram". We all know what happened after that.
@@user-zb8mj9yv4f they still think cameras are haram as they liken it to the artist who paints/draws. The only difference is they make exceptions for the portrait of the king 🤦
You allowed him to. It was people like you who created this illusionary principle that whoever doesn't side with protesters making fools of themselves in public, has no opinion. Don't complain now that you see the fruits of your ignorant efforts.
Man did you consult anyone knowledgeable before doing this? I can't imagine anyone who wants the best for you advising you to do it or that it is ok to do it. Really what were you thinking. Sajid lipham and Shamsi are going to have a field day with this garbage.
Another question came to mind because you guys use the prophet as an example. For example you say, the prophet did such and such, so do you think you are more pious than him? Yesterday I came across this hadith: Jabir narrated that The Prophet said: “Do not enter upon Al-Mughibar (the women whose husband are absent), for indeed the Shaitan flows through one of you as the blood flows.” We said: “And you?” He said: “And me, but Allah helped me over him, so I am safe.” حَدَّثَنَا نَصْرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ يُونُسَ، عَنْ مُجَالِدٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " لاَ تَلِجُوا عَلَى الْمُغِيبَاتِ فَإِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ يَجْرِي مِنْ أَحَدِكُمْ مَجْرَى الدَّمِ " . قُلْنَا وَمِنْكَ قَالَ " وَمِنِّي وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَانَنِي عَلَيْهِ فَأَسْلَمُ " . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ مِنْ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ . وَقَدْ تَكَلَّمَ بَعْضُهُمْ فِي مُجَالِدِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ مِنْ قِبَلِ حِفْظِهِ . وَسَمِعْتُ عَلِيَّ بْنَ خَشْرَمٍ يَقُولُ قَالَ سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ فِي تَفْسِيرِ قَوْلِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَانَنِي عَلَيْهِ فَأَسْلَمُ " . يَعْنِي أَسْلَمُ أَنَا مِنْهُ . قَالَ سُفْيَانُ وَالشَّيْطَانُ لاَ يُسْلِمُ . وَ " لاَ تَلِجُوا عَلَى الْمُغِيبَاتِ " وَالْمُغِيبَةُ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي يَكُونُ زَوْجُهَا غَائِبًا وَالْمُغِيبَاتُ جَمَاعَةُ الْمُغِيبَةِ . Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1172 sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1172 So if the prophet was alone in his house arguing with women, does that allow us to do it too?
I see that many are shifting the goalpost from seeing to showing. First things first, showing what exactly? Those who say awrah, what is the evidence of awrah for non Muslim women? What is it? Secondly do they also condemn markets? Because whether it's on a private property or a public someone is responsible for the market. Would they condemn the Khalif for allowing non-muslim women to reveal their hair to Muslim men? Are they against the existence of mixed markets altogether?
video came out an hour ago and is nearly 45 minutes long yet people have been hating in the comments 30-45 minutes ago meaning they didnt even watch the video.
Brother, calling any advice hatred means you'll never get better. When advice is said, don't misword it. Most of the people in the comments like and acknowledge hijabs works for the deen, but would hate it if his attitude changed like this. Hating something that's bad is good. A parent hates that his kids become sick.
just the first 10 mins it’s more than enough, don’t need to hear this long drawn out video to justify something they both know is comprising their beliefs
@@AshrafAnam "who are they to advice x and y" is pure arrogance by x and y, and in the case of u, it is you being subjective. Advice is advice, truth is truth. If the imam that memorised the whole quran made a mistake in prayer, a 6 year old kid can correct him.
Brother Hijab can you make a video about the recent viral topic raised about a well known dawah bro approach a single mum for misyar marriage? Would love to know your thoughts on this.
Развлечения
References:
١- وقال الإمام أحمد : (( الزينة الظاهرة الثياب ، وكل شيء منه عورة ( يعني : المرأة)، حتى الظفر ، ولا نقول في نساء أهل الذمة شيئا)) .
سأل الحسن البصري : إنا نبيع القطن ، فيأتينا نساء أهل الذمة ، فنرى شعورهن ؟ فقال الحسن : ليس به بأس . تخريج الدولابي في الكنى.
2- ، قال : «سألت إبراهيم [يعني النخعي] ، قال : فقلت : إنا نبايع العلوج بهذه الكرابيس ، فنرى بطونهن وأشعارهن ، فقال : ليست لهن حرمة» . أخرجه الدوري عن ابن معين في تاريخه (رقم4649) ، قال : «حدثنا يحيى قال حدثنا عبد الرحمن بن مهدى قال حدثنا سفيان عن مستغفر البجلي» ، وهذا إسناد يثبت به النقل عن النخعي .
أدركت رَسُول اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ [وعمرت ] ، وكانت تمر فِي الأسواق، وتأمر بالمعروف، وتنهى عَنِ المنكر، وتضرب الناس عَلَى ذلك بسوط كَانَ معها.
الاستيعاب في معرفة الأصحاب - ابن عبد البر ٤/١٨٦٣
And in at-Tabaranis al mu´jam al kabir no. 785:
قَالَ: رَأَيْتُ سَمْرَاءَ بِنْتَ نَهِيكٍ، وَكَانَتْ قَدْ أَدْرَكَتِ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ: «عَلَيْهَا دِرْعٌ غَلِيظٌ، وَخِمَارٌ غَلِيظٌ، بِيَدِهَا سَوْطٌ تُؤَدِّبُ النَّاسَ، وَتَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ، وَتَنْهَى عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ»
Al-Albany authenticates it in الرد المفحم ص ١٥٥.
@@MohammedHijab So brother, if I bring the quotes from the salaf who have the opinion that women's feet are not awrah, it becomes fine for me to share their picture on my X and YT account?
They don't justify you distributing the vision of ' awrah' of women to Muslim masses. They are just about casual, 'sight' of women without an active intentionality. The two cases are completely different (and that too exceptional opinions as you yourself have mentioned).
Akhi, accept that you were wrong in this case. Nobody is 100% right. Or reply to my questions in another video. I would love to hear your counters.
@@tarrasbulba4408 why are people surprised that there is no unity in the ummah. Our scholars will never see eye to eye on every fiqh matter. Why keep bringing these issues up instead of moving on with what unites us: the Kalimah
may Allah ease our Ummah in these desperate times especially our brothers in Palestine may Allah grant them and us Jannah 🤲
@@nayabHussain-jw8yr Ameen
I appreciate how so many in the comments section called them out on their actions. It shows that we don't just follow anyone blindly. May Allah bless and guide each of us.
You're following Saudi scholars blindly.
@@user-zb8mj9yv4f No and what's the point between this video and Saudi scholars?
@@thelawsless Saudi scholars are the ones who prioritized minor issues like Music, Face covering, and beard over the fundamentals of Faith.
@@user-zb8mj9yv4f What is the most fundamental article of faith? and what does it mean?
Ameen
Reading the comments restored my faith in the Muslim masses. We still have hope, we still have some sanity left. Alhamdulillah.
Salafism is a lie. Prophet Nuh and Luts wives were from the disbelievers as God says in the Quran. Bukhari is a man made book.
Well it's just in the Comments reality is different.
@@zahin2986Allah Help and Gude us.
Yes الحمد لله
I'm really happy with I'm reading الحمد لله
i am great noah, alhamdulillah!
Brother Muhammed, I have been listening to the references you have mentioned and I have read them and jazakullahu khairan for teaching me and others that the awrah ruling does not fall onto the non-muslim. Therefore, we cannot force them to wear any hijab etc. However, this is completely segregated from the idea of displaying these women on your videos. Interaction with women is halal as long as it does not fall into haram, but that does not justify YOU showing or assisting the production team to showing these women on your videos. Us viewers are not the ones interacting with them so we fall under the ruling of lower our gazes and you are not assisting that at all. You are creating a fitna among your Muslim viewers and there is definitely a way to avoid that. I ask Allah to guide you and the rest of us. And Allah knows best
so we shouldn't leave our house if there are women clothing in bad ways? I mean what he is portraying is not even haram, and if you find it to be haram then you will just not watch it no?
Looking and focussing on a screen is different than walking outside while lowering the gaze. A story play expects your attention.
We should find a cave .
@@amjadrasheed444 thank you Brother. Common sense.
@@ExperimentalKana please don't compare necessity with something needless like this. The youth can be engaged without making films like this.
If you are a hijab supporter just like me but is not at all convinced by any of his justifications here and deeply wish him to understand the haqq on this matter like this comment just to let him know .
i am great noah, alhamdulillah!
It doesn't matter if people are already watching haram or are likely to do so. Doesn't mean you're allowed to show Haram to Muslims as well.
But at least he wasn't on date with her.
@@mohdafnan8278 Shia
You watched it yourself.
It not impractical to just listen
Did you even watch the video?
@@AnEclecticMind not going to waste 40 minutes of my time listening to someone justify an action that the entire scholarship of Islam clearly forbids.
I really looked up to you both because you represented unapologetic strength as Muslims. But now I find you both here sounding like the average liberal Muslim in the West. Sad times.
Well now you know to not follow based on emotions and actually follow the truthful refutations of these charlatans that were made years ago. If you had an ounce of sincerity you would've read/listened to those refutations years ago, but people like them prey on your vulnerability and lack of knowledge. Wake up now before its too late brother
i am great noah, alhamdulillah!
WHO AGREE, ALI DAWAH NEEDS DAWAH😂?
grow up
You nailed it😅
We disagree with them on this video and this justification. However, they are still our brothers in islam and we shouldn't mock them/Ali.
قال الله - تعالى - :
*﴿ لا يسخر قوم من قوم ﴾ - سورة الحجرات.*
@@youssefassemzahran9911 You should address this to Ali first when he said, “The religion doesn't belong to your dad or mother!” What brother says such words? Actually, @AbdullahAl-Masoodi2243 is completely correct. Ali Dawah needs Dawah. His sarcastic way of speaking is very strange, to be honest. I wonder if he can accept criticism at all!
@@am99899 I mean he can accept criticism. The problem is that the level of criticism is so weak which is the problem. Ali literally seems to get criticized and mocked frequently, by people that don't rlly know what theyre talking about and have a tunnel vision view of religion. Criticising Ali doesnt mean you have a tunnel view of religion, but when people are willing to mock the likes of shaykh dedu then it's kind of clear who's the problem
Justifying a sin is worse than committing a sin while acknowledging it's fault in your heart I always tell myself and my family
Sorry for judging, but your profile picture looks like a cosplay from an anime. Anime also contains haram if not most of it is haram.
@@Khawla-ic2th Thank you for the reminder. It's from a video game many years ago and of course i won't try to justify anything Jazak'Allah Khair
You can't on one hand say wearing revealing clothing is a sin then on the other hand facilitate that sin by featuring it in a drama show.
You can make the same argument about living in the west lol 😂 very easily the same argument could be living in the west or working side by side women etc
@@Otainment_47 a muslim shouldn't actually move to a kaffir country (if they weren't already born there) unless there's a plausible need.
This is a drama, there's no need or urgency to make it with women in revealing clothing.
bruh
these women are not muslim stop ruining our religion please
@@Otainment_47but that’s for necessity, and either way they must lower their gaze even if they work side by side.
@@lussein1 exactly
I swear I hear Ali Dawah insulting his viewers more than he actually gives out Dawah. We know the religion is not for our dad, and it also is not for you to tell us our views are wrong when you’re trying to normalise something we have rejected for hundreds of years. May allah swt guide you.
There’s a difference between seeing a woman in the marketplace not practicing proper hijab and making a woman without hijab accessible to the wider public.
Why do we sit in segregation at functions if there’s is so much evidence on men seeing woman in the Islamic world without a hijab? Going out of your way to see and put a kafir without hijab on a platform is crazyyyy
You've spoken my heart out. By the logic brother Hijab has given, there is no sin to look at non-believing women at all
How do you propose bringing people to Islam.
Wallahi if I hadn't already become muslim and was thinking about maybe becoming muslim now, then i read the comments of the muslims in these videos i would stay as far away from islam as i could.
@@Vicious12384able we bring people to Islam using halal ways. Using the ways our prophet ﷺ and sahaba used to bring people to Islam. If you think we should bring people close to Islam using ways that are relatable to them, then aren't you saying that the way of the prophet ﷺ wasn't the optimal way? That halal ways aren't enough, we must use haram too? Aren't you saying that ways allowed by Allah aren't enough to bring people to Islam?
The jahiliya days of makkah involved almost every promiscuity you can think of right now. There were uncovered women at that time as well, and the youth were attracted to them as well. Musical instruments were also popular at the time. Free mixing was just as rampant. Did our prophet ﷺ use any of these to spread Islam? Did the sahaba reject Islam because oh no, it isn't being spread by relatable means?
Haram can never be justified and is out of the occasion.
Alhamdulillah you're a Muslim now my dear brother, I'm really happy to hear that. May Allah keep your and mine hearts steady on Iman and hidayah. Ameen ya rab.
i am great noah, alhamdulillah!
The debate here is not an easy one, because one can say “it’s haram, full stop” and one can justify it by explaining the end goals behind the project. HOWEVER, I think, the one simple question we should ask is: was is avoidable? Could this project have been done without women or at least blurring the awrah of these women? YES.
If it was avoidable, then it should have been.
Being part of western society and being surrounded by non Muslim uncovered women is unavoidable if one lives and works in the west. But filming and sharing their image, is a choice. After all only allah knows the real intentions and may Allah swt guide us all.
I think it is directed to non Muslims and Muslim movie-addicts.
I wonder how many thumbs down this video got.
300 according to Bring back dislikes
360 by now
427
534 as of current and 1.4k likes
it's not an good matric anymore, because now most people don't dislike the video even if they hate it. They just don't care about it.
Anything to follow one’s desires. May Allah guide the both of you. Ameen
Sorry, but I have to disagree. If at the time of the sahaba, men and women were talking, was this done outside? Or in a segregated place?
Was the 'chat' broadcast to the world?
Were the women 'beautified' and shown to the world? ( muslim women in the videos have definitely got makeup one, plucked eye brows etc) this is shown to the muslim women of the world, and they may interpret this 'code' as being halal and the men watching may have different thoughts.
The sheikh who brought his daughter into the room, im sorry, but was a mahram man present? Yes, therefore, you can't use that to justify.
I feel that you are so desperate to find something in the hadith literature to support what you are doing, that you are using weak hadith to justify, and they are not even the same scneario.
If you were debating a christian, and you told him his bible is corrupt and you advised the Christian to follow the authentic tradition of jesus pbuh, but then he turns around and says 'you should do the same'
Deep down, i can see you know what you are doing is not right, but finding an excuse to justify it.
This is the first comment I ever made on RUclips in my 15 years of watching: I used to be inspired by you brother Mohammed hijab, perhaps still am. But brother, please stay on the right path. The messages you are sending is very confusing to us.
Which messages?
Akhi i won't even get into the technicalities of the fiqh but as a well-known respected da'ee, you have a duty to safeguard your honour/dignity more than the average muslim. You can spin this however you want but bottom line is this sort of work would've been seen as something beneath the people dawah/knowledge. You're better than this.
Also i find it ironic that you hold such lenient views on freemixing/awrah yet you dont apply this on your own womenfolk. I recall Ali censoring the image and voice of his wife on a video. So where's the consistency?
You are an overzealous child, please leave serious matters of Islamic jurisprudence to those who dedicate their lives to it. Humble yourself my son.
@HeadshotKillaa what's wrong with you? You either are idolizing these daees or don't understand islam. Attacking the brother who commented doesn't invalidate his argument
@@RazorStan 👏🏼
for his wife he protects as for the women of others there is no regard , where is loving for your brother what you love for your self
@@RazorStan Perhaps I'm cautious of the recent phenomenon of actual children and youth challenging daees / those who've dedicated their lives to propagating the deen. Brothers will go online and completely anonymously defame another brother who has placed himself in the public eye for the sake of Allah, over a difference of opinion issue. Calling them "dayooths". Wallahi I feel even if they knew the implications of this word they'd still use it. Without questioning their active p*rnhub subscriptions, these anonymous brothers satisfy their ego and play sheikh for a few hours online, without seeing the damage they're doing to those who only stand up for them and their future.
Glad most of the people in the comments seeing through their "excuses" of justifying their actions.
Hence why Muslims are getting beaten up and destroyed everywhere. Non-Muslims are the ones bearing the flag of freedom for Palestine while we sit at home advising each other on music and "awrah."
U did not watch the full vid did u
@@Freestatue99 watched a part of it, I don't like listening to him anyway. I saw the evidence he gave. He basically became a liberal Muslim. You can try blindly following someone like him, but you need to be honest to admit he is wrong just like everyone else can see. Everyone is seeing through it.
@@musfiqurkashem8614 ok that’s y I said u did not watch the whole video u missed some important points im not saying he is not wrong or right
@musfiqurkashem8614 , you didn't even watched the full video so you have absolutely no right to speak. Talking about liberal Muslim while Hijab is the one who defending the Muslim world from liberalism for more than a decade is kinda funny.
Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-'As reported Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:
Verily, Allah does not take away knowledge by snatching it from the people but He takes away knowledge by taking away the scholars, so that when He leaves no learned person, people turn to the ignorant as their leaders; then they are asked to deliver religious verdicts and they deliver them without knowledge, they go astray, and lead others astray.
A little advice with my weak english look at this beautiful hadith reported:
I went to Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and he asked me, "Have you come to inquire about piety?" I replied in the affirmative. Then he said, "Ask your heart regarding it. Piety is that which contents the soul
and comforts the heart, and sin is that which causes doubts and perturbs the heart, even if people pronounce it lawful and give you verdicts on such matters again and again.
From my perspective as female if you want to establish light and purity in your heart low youre gaze
Ali saying mmm mmm act like he understands what muhammed hijab is saying 😂😂😂😂😂
So that means we as a muslim allowed to see non muslim women’s belly or hair in casual communicating manner with them as long as we as a muslim men aren’t attractive towards thier feminine beauty!
They are misguiding
Well you’re not meant to obviously stare at it. But in a public domain, where such women might be unavoidably present or you may need to encounter.
Just use a bit of common sense.
No just because public display of awrah orbsuvh is happening doesnt justify mislims being allowed to look at it. These are very different my brother @SupermanOG
@@yusufrashid8875 I’m not saying it should be looked at. But what I’m saying is that in a public space, where such women may unavoidably be present, then you may inadvertently look and see it. Point being, men should then not look again / stare or look with a wrong intention. Unless you’re choosing to live a life like a hermit, then being in the presence of this is unavoidable. That’s largely the point hijab was making too.
@@SupermanOGmaybe they don't understand "Let Allah be The Judge" in situations like this. It's like Haram Police, the more they learn the more they become judgemental towards other Muslim, not understanding. Bigger problem for the ummat are forgotten.
my main issue is brother, if one of these women decide to cover up what will we do? The only possibility would be to censor the film if you don't wanna delete it. One possibility may be to say that the woman take on the responsibility themselves and we delete or censor the videos but there will still be copies out there.
There’s no need for Ali in this video! Even with technicalities nobody will say this engagement with uncovered women is necessary so forget about the look of desire etc! Would you put your mum or sister or daughter in in such an environment
Is that what makes it permissible?
Unfortunately Ali himself is in denial about his own show being absolutely unacceptable and haram
@@OmarAlbani please do not speak without knowledge, go and educate yourself about this matter and realise there is tabard, ie difference of opinion
What are you doing on RUclips bro?
@@saifklee178 I’m not defending harām ! Furthermore being on RUclips isn’t necessarily harām think before just saying anything just because people you look up to are called out
Why are you defending your sins? Why can't you just accept your shortcomings?
Ali is the main culprit. He must be influencing Hijab. Why are you doing this man? You used to talk against these kind of stuff before what happened?
He's a bootlicker
He always does this whenever he's catching flak, he makes Hijab defend him in public
What we know from qur an and sunnah. Is to "Lower your gaze"
Even as we knew the enemies of rasullullah sallallahu alaihi wa asallam, tried to use promisquise women in the battle of badr - i bieleve it to be the battle of badr correct me if i am wrong.
Akhi what is wrong with your affair at the moment is that you have invested time, sweat and hard work into this movie of yours, however you appraoch in the wrong manner. This is how the shaytan plays with people. Because now you know what you show in the movie is blatantly harram.
And because you dont want that hard work to be for nothing, this is where the shaytan makes you his victim and then go on to justify harram, just like the thousands of muslims who have fallen into the hands of shaytan in this manner.
Akhi, think of the day of qyammat. Showing the awrah is against the command of allah. And you do this openly, freely casually. Do you not comprehend that this is a sin that not only is done openly, but intended to be done openly to alot of people?
What would the nabi saw say if he witnesses what your doing?
Look we know islam is growing, and growing rapidly. - that is enough. That will serfice for us muslims. Yes continue the dawah.
BUT DO NOT IMITATE THE DISBIELEVERS!!!!!!!!
do not use their instruments, their tools, there ways to make our ways easier, it is their way. Not the way of muslims. Because they are dead, we are alive. We have no need for it.
Shaytan plays with people like this. "Islam is growing rapidly so how can we spice it up abit?" And then you want to do more and more, be more ambigous all for the sake of boosting the dawah even though at the cost of bringing and supporting a great fitnah.
This is very very and i mean very greedy now.
LEAVE IT TO ALLAH.
Leave it to him, normal dawah is enough, debates is enough.
Even Jihad is more than enough.
But wanting to be like hollywood, and be careless in the showing of awrah, and saying it is now justified?
You are now sounding like all the munafikeen who are one point were great muslims, but fell to the wispers of shaytan.
Protect yourself from this akhi hijab and akhi ali.
For the sake of allah, protect yourself.
May allah open the perception of reasoning for you both and a glimps into to the error of this way of dawah, as this can cause one to fall away from the religion.
Ameen.
💯
Legit.
Allah isn't real grow up
أخي محمد حجاب
انك في مكانة علمية و دعوية و في موقع رفعك الله فيه
فلا تفعل ما يمكن ان يجعلك تهبط من مكانتك
لا تبرر
اذا احتجت للتبرير فإن قلبك غير منشرح لهذا الامر بداية
انك تحمل هموم الأمة
و تمثلنا في اماكن كثيرة
و تدافع عن الحق
فلا تضع نفسك في موضع الريبة أو المدافع
إن لك تقديرا في قلوبنا
و أسأل الله أن يجعلك دائما علي الصراط المستقيم
الحمدلله على كل حال للأسف ما توقعتها منه أنه يضع نفسه في موضع الشك أبدًا وحتى واثق من صحبته سليمة وسمعتهم طيبة ولكن قل آمين يارب أن اللي بيطالعونه ماينظرون في وجيه وشعور النساء أو أي من عوراتهن ولا يجيه ذنوب منها بل حسنات لأنه قد يجذب الضالين الكفارأو الجاهلين والله يحوله إلى خير ونهر جاري حسنات لا سيئات
آمين
وصراحة اللي قهرني أنه تكلم يقول أن أحمد رحمه عليه الله كان صارم مع العلم قال ما وافق آية 31 النور ﴿ وَقُل لِّلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنَ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا ۖ وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَىٰ جُيُوبِهِنَّ ۖ وَلَا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ أَوِ التَّابِعِينَ غَيْرِ أُولِي الْإِرْبَةِ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ أَوِ الطِّفْلِ الَّذِينَ لَمْ يَظْهَرُوا عَلَىٰ عَوْرَاتِ النِّسَاءِ ۖ وَلَا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينَ مِن زِينَتِهِنَّ ۚ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ﴾ قال جل جلاله إلا ما ظهر منها ولم يقل ما أظهرن شف الفرق لو قال ما أظهرن يعني عمدًا المرأة كشفته ولكن ما ظهر يعني انكشف دون أن تكشفه وقال جماعة من الصحابة منهم مجاهد ومقاتل وإذا ما خاب ظني ابن العباس قالوا أنها الثياب التي تظهر ولا تظهرها المرأة وفيه أدلة نقل كثير غير كحديث عائشة عن الركبان وهم في الكعبة أسدلة إحدانا جلبابها من رأسها على وجهها وأم سلمة نقلت عن حال الصحابيات ونساء الأنصار بعد آية الحجاب في سورة الأحزاب 59 ووصفت كالغرابيب السود وأيضًا ابن عباس في تفسيره لها قال أمر الله نساء المؤمنين إذا خرجن من بيوتهن في حاجة أن يغطين وجيههن من فوق رؤوسهن إلى آخر ما قال على العموم لو نأخذها بالعقل كيف لا يكون الوجه زينة وأنتم بكرامة القدم زينة ولا وحتى في الآية نفسها في سورة نور ذكر الضرب بالرجل فنعم كلها عورة وش المشكلة وبعدين يقول نغطي الكافرات لا لاتغطيهم ياخي بس احجبهم حاول ما تخليهم يستعملون المستحضرات إذا أمكن أقل شيء لا تبرر وقول نعم خطأ وأنا أجازف وحاول في المتابعين تنصحهم تجيب أدلة لغض البصر مو العكس جلطني ويقول أن الناس تشوف النساء فخلاص عادي ما فيه مشكلة دامه ظاهر في كل مكان لا تكمل على أخوانك يقول الرسول عليه السلام بعد ما أتو الناس برجل قد شرب خمرًا قال اضربوه فمنهم ضرب بيده ومنهم بثوبه ومنهم بالنعال فقال أحدهم أخزاه الله كم يؤتى به فقال عليه السلام لا تعينوا الشيطان على أخيكم وآخر شيء معليش أطلت صوت المرأة ليس بحرام ولا جدالها أو نقاشها شريطة أن لا يكون هناك خلوة والمرأة بكامل حجابها (أكيد أتكلم إذا كانت مسلمة) وليست متعطرة والرجل ساتر عورته ولا يلين قوله ولا هي تخضع في قولها وقولهم قول معروف يعني في أمر مهم والأمر الذي جاؤوا إليه ويغض الرجل عنها وتغض هي عنه فكيف لعاقل أن يقول بعد هذا أن أحدهما سيفتن بالثاني
@@raniahouda9858 شكرا لك يااختنا
كلام سديد أختي، جزاكي الله خير
What happen to lowering one’s gaze. What did Allah say about it.
we must lower our gaze, AND, we musn't create fitna by promoting haram ideas.
Nice discussion brothers. What I would like to kindly add is that when you leave your house, you are in no control of what happens outside, similarly to the scholars you have quoted on people doing trade, which is necessity for livelihood and whoever comes to their place of business, is of no control to them. I do agree that we need dawah films, documentaries to get our youth back to Islam as you have rightly said, 95-100% is watching Hollywood, Netflix and unfortunately getting corrupted.
Full steams ahead for the films and documentaries, however as the contents displayed are at your control, this is where the main controversy will be..
So they force hijāb on the non-Muslims is what you are suggesting? 😂😂😂 That wouldn't even make any sense in the film/series. That would be more a meme than effective da'wa.
We cannot make compelling media if it doesn’t reflect reality. Mohamed hijab is being practical, all the people criticising him went through multiple steps where non Muslim uncovered women appeared in ads and thumbnails just to accuse MH of spreading immorality. Then they go back to Netflix or whatever, it’s like people have lost their minds!
@@AshrafAnam why add non Muslims and liberals in movies.
@@AshrafAnam The other option is to not make a film with non Muslim women in it.
@@AshrafAnam just blur them lol.
You're creating divisions among your viewers by engaging things in the gray area. No urgency whatsoever to make this drama series or whatever you called it, you're just too drunk for being a "celebrity" for too long. It's not too late to correct your way now.
I agree but sadly even something as common sense as saying the earth is round will cause divisions because we as an ummah are too argumentative
@@user-op8fg3ny3j The earth being round isn't common sense, it is rather something that is learned. I'd argue common sense is what we know from birth. Regardless I don't see how this has to do with the issue here.
@@Umar-qy3bd either way, the point is that it is a factual truth yet stating that publicly will also cause division in the ummah
I need a The Haqiqat Show episode about this pronto 🍿
Hahah same.
@Boo-sc9gz hehe won't do it because he doesn't want to cause more fitna
Daniel is too busy attacking muslims like shamsi who actually teaches the religion of Islam.
@@Abu_Idris people like shamsi are also dangerous to Islam. ☪️
Daniel is a waffler, he wont do this cos he aint sincere in refuting the wrong
Early to mo hijab video 🙌
lol where was all this talk before this series was made? Weird
Brother hijab I love for you sake of Allah AJW. You are one of those da'ii who brought back millions of muslim youth like me in from haram path of secularism. May allah swt bless you and guide us. But akhi lately you are promoting CLEAR Haram even from naked eyes. Pls brothers don't do this. Fear Allah! Fear Allah,!Fear Allah. This only a nasheaha from your brother.
Same feeling here .
Thank you
loool who did you think these dudes were ?? they have always been grifting clout chasers
You should take your own advice thinking you are more pious and knowledgeable than Hasan al-Basrī. Have some shame and fear Allāh.
@@AshrafAnam they asked Hasan Al Basri (ra) because they were earning a living. One is necessity and the other is...?
You think Hasan Al basri (ra) would permit making movies with the kuffar like this...?
This is a very nice subject. Thank you for that
There is so much that is astounding and could be said about this segment.
Both speakers in this video are guilty of what they accuse their critics of, pertaining to how textual evidence are being thrown into the mix without looking into how scholars understood these texts or how can they be reconciled with other textual evidence that have stated opposite views.
Let's grant that those quoted texts are indeed sound and have been stated, it's key to note that there are countless evidence that indicate otherwise (statements of the very scholars quoted like Al Hassan Al Basri) especially on the issue of free-mixing. Nonetheless, this is a matter that is to be looked into by Specialists in the fields of Fiqh and Usul. The approach of both in the video, is not how these matters are to be addressed from a scholarly point of view, especially that scholars are being quoted and frankly neither one have displayed a hint of scholarship in their discourse but they have done what every laymen does, quote evidence.
It is one thing to reference and quote evidence, but it is a completely different game to be able to extract relevant rulings from the evidence to the issue at hand. Not to mention, how these statements could be misunderstood by the laity and present as means by which certain things are deemed lawful.
I was on the fence leaning towards the stricter side on this (in opinion), but the ahadith you shared, even though I'd heard some of them before already, along with your reasoning, definitely swayed me.
However, there was some reasoning I found flawed; regarding the line between different inconveniences, there may be some arbitrariness, but I think the qualitative difference between the examples Hijab shared is that in one, you are not yourself displaying the woman, you simply have a likelihood of seeing them by going to the park, whereas here, you are directly participating in it.
That said, your case didn't hinge on this, so I was still convinced, but I do especially wonder about if and when some of these non-Muslim girls convert to Islam in the future and start observing hijab.
Some of those ahadith were very eye-opening, though. I do agree that one mistake you can fall into is getting your right and wrong from whatever version of Islam you happen to be brought up in or trained in instead of evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and that's no different than liberals whose morality just comes from the society around them.
But there is some inconsistancy in what M hijab presented. Evidces are for seeing, but the conclusion is about actively showing and spreading it.
Evidence from the Quran:
(قُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ يَغُضُّوا مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِمْ وَيَحْفَظُوا فُرُوجَهُمْ ذَلِكَ أَزْكَى لَهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ خَبِيرٌ بِمَا يَصْنَعُونَ) النور/30
Evidence from the Sunnah:
روى مسلم (2159) عن جرير بن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال: (سَأَلْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ نَظَرِ الْفُجَاءَةِ فَأَمَرَنِي أَنْ أَصْرِفَ بَصَرِي).
وروى أبو داود (2151) والترمذي (2777) عَنِ بُرَيْدَةَ رضي الله عنه قَالَ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم لِعَلِىٍّ - رضي الله عنه- : ( يَا عَلِىُّ لاَ تُتْبِعِ النَّظْرَةَ النَّظْرَةَ فَإِنَّ لَكَ الأُولَى وَلَيْسَتْ لَكَ الآخِرَةُ ) وحسنه الألباني في صحيح أبي داود
روى البخاري (5240) عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ، قَالَ: قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: لاَ تُبَاشِرُ المَرْأَةُ المَرْأَةَ، فَتَنْعَتَهَا لِزَوْجِهَا كَأَنَّهُ يَنْظُرُ إِلَيْهَا
Evidence from the Sahabah:
قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ».
The nonexistence of Khilaf on this matter:
قال ابن القطان الفاسي في إحكام النظر في أحكام النظر :"(105) - مسألة: فإن كانت هذه الأجنبية الحرة كافرة، هل هي في جواز نظر الرجال إليها كالمؤمنة؟ أو أقل حرمة؟: يظهر في ذلك مثل المؤمنة، ولا أعرف خلاف ذلك، وإنما وجب أن تكون مثلها لتساويها في تحريك الشهوة، وتعرض الناظر إليها للفتنة، بل ربما كانت النفس بما تعلم من (هوى)".
Regarding the narration from الحسن البصري
1) It was only narrated by الدولابي, who was criticized by the scholars of الجرح والتعديل.
جاء في ميزان الاعتدال للذهبي ص459:
«قال ابن عدي: ابن حماد متهم فيما قاله في نعيم بن حماد لصلابته في أهل الرأي.
وقال حمزة السهمي: سألت الدارقطني عن الدولابي فقال: تكلموا فيه لما تبين من أمره الأخير.
وقال ابن يونس: كان الدولابي من أهل الصنعة حتى التصنيف، وكان يضعف».
وجاء في لسان الميزان ص506:
«وعاب عليه ابن عَدِي تعصبه المفرط لمذهبه حتى قال في الحديث الذي رواه أبو حنيفة عن منصور بن زاذان عن الحسن عن معبد الجهني عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم (في القهقهة): معبد هذا هو ابن هوذة الذي ذكره البخاري في تاريخه. ⦗٥٠٧⦘
قال ابن عَدِي: وهذا الذي قاله غير صحيح وذلك أن معبد بن هوذة أنصاري فكيف يكون جهنيا؟ ومعبد الجهني معروف ليس بصحابي وما حمل الدولابي على ذلك إلا ميله لمذهبه».
2) Another issue with the إسناد
فضل بن يونس أبو شعبة ليس له إلا هذه الرواية وإذا كان التوثيق من الدولابي فلا يساوي شيئاً وكل من لهم هذا الاسم المفضل بن يونس ولهم تراجم في الكتب ليس لهم هذه الكنية ولو فرضنا أنه ثقة فهل أدرك غالباً القطان ؟ هذا محل شك فلا يوجد أحد اسمه المفضل بن يونس يروي عن غالب القطان إلا في هذا الأثر فقط.
3) And this opposes what البخاري narrated
قَال الْبُخَارِيُّ ج٨ص٥٠: وَقَالَ سَعِيدُ بْنُ أَبِي الحَسَنِ، لِلْحَسَنِ: إِنَّ نِسَاءَ العَجَمِ يَكْشِفْنَ صُدُورَهُنَّ وَرُءُوسَهُنَّ؟ قَالَ: «اصْرِفْ بَصَرَكَ عَنْهُنَّ».
4) If it was authentic, it is specific for temporarily seeing the hair of who you're selling to. This does not apply to showing and presenting uncovered women to the masses "for dawah", let alone showing women who uncover more than their hair and who wear tight clothes.
Regarding سمراء بنت نهيك:
1) Assuming it's authentic, she was old. As ابن عبد البر said, "she lived a long life". And she did nothing except enjoin good and forbid evil in the market, a place everyone had to go to. Neither does this apply to those who aren't old, nor does it apply to unnecessary free-mixing elsewhere.
2) She could be from the إماء, because walking in the markets was from habits of the إماء and not the حرائر, which is mentioned by عمر May الله be pleased with him.
جاء في مصنف عبد الرزاق ص135:
٥٠٦٢ - عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، أَنَّ صَفِيَّةَ بِنْتَ أَبِي عُبَيْدٍ، حَدَّثَتْهُ أَنَّ عُمَرَ رَأَى وَهُوَ يَخْطُبُ النَّاسَ أَمَةً خَرَجَتْ مِنْ بَيْتِ حَفْصَةَ تَجُوسُ النَّاسَ مُلْتَبِسَةً لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ، فَلَمَّا انْصَرَفَ دَخَلَ عَلَى حَفْصَةَ ابْنَةِ عُمَرَ، فَقَالَ: «مَنِ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي خَرَجَتْ مِنْ عِنْدِكِ تَجُوسُ الرِّجَالَ؟» قَالَتْ: تِلْكَ جَارِيَةٌ، جَارِيَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ قَالَ: «فَمَا يَحْمِلُكِ أَنْ تُلْبِسِي جَارِيَةَ أَخِيكِ لِبَاسَ الْحَرَائِرِ؟ فَقَدْ دَخَلْتُ عَلَيْكِ، وَلَا أَرَاهَا، إِلَّا حُرَّةً فَأَرَدْتُ أَنْ أُعَاقِبَهَا».
قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: «وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة».
Making this irrelevant to the case trying to be justified.
3) Some weakened the إسناد, because there's no known سماع of حيى بن أبي سُلَيم from سمراء بنت نهيك.
References:
جاء في كتاب إظهار الحق والصواب في حكم الحجاب ص703:
الشبهة السابعة والعشرون: استدلالهم بأن سمراء بنت نهيك وكانت تؤدب الناس، وتأمر بالمعروف، فعن يحيى بن أبي سليم قال: «رَأَيْتُ سَمْرَاءَ بنتَ نَهِيكٍ، وَكَانَتْ قَدْ أَدْرَكَتِ النَّبِيَّ - صلى الله عليه وسلم -:عَلَيْهَا دِرْعٌ غَلِيظٌ، وَخِمَارٌ غَلِيظٌ، بِيَدِهَا سَوْطٌ تُؤَدِّبُ النَّاسَ، وَتَأْمُرُ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ، وَتَنْهَى عَنِ الْمُنْكَرِ».
هذه القصة رواها الطبراني في الكبير، وهي ضعيفة؛ لأن يحيى بن أبي سُلَيم لا يعلم له سماع من سمراء بنت نهيك، بل لم يعاصرها، وإنما سمع منها أبو بلج الصغير واسمه جارية بن بلج، وهو مجهول، وقد حسن بعضهم هذه القصة بسبب حصول اشتباه بين أبي بلج يحيى بن سُليم، ويقال ابن أبي سليم، وبين أبي بلج جارية بن بلج، فظنوا أن الأول هو الثاني، وليس كذلك كما سبق. فالقصة ضعيفة من جهة سندها.
وأيضاً يرد عليهم بما قاله فضل إلهي: «لم يرد فيه أن النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - أو أحد الخلفاء الراشدين - رضي الله عنهم - ولاها على حسبة السوق غاية ما في الأمر أنها كانت تقوم بالاحتساب في السوق، وقيام أحد بذلك في السوق، لا يدل على تعيينه والياً على حسبة السوق».
وأيضاً على فرض صحتها فالمرأة المذكورة كبيرة السن، ودعاة الاختلاط يبحثون عن الشابات، ويبحثون عمن تقبل الاختلاط، لا عمن تأتي لتحارب منكرات الاختلاط وغيرها، فلو كانت هذه المرأة حية لأدبت بسوطها أصحاب الاختلاط؛ لأنهم يتاجرون بالنساء، ويتخذونهن متعة رخيصة. انتهى
وجاء في كتاب كشف الغمة عن أدلة الحجاب في الكتاب والسنة ص276:
وهذا يشهد أن سمراء بنت نهيك كانت من الإماء؛ لأن المشي في الأسواق كان من عادة الإماء دون الحرائر، كما أسلفنا مما ورد عن عمر - رضي الله عنه - (لما رأى أمة خرجت من بيت حفصة تجوس الناس ملتبسة لباس الحرائر، فدخل على حفصة ابنة عمر فقال: "من المرأة التي خرجت من عندك تجوس الرجال"؟ قالت تلك جارية عبد الرحمن. قال: "فما يحملك أن تلبسي جارية أخيك لباس الحرائر، فقد دخلت عليك ولا أراها إلا حرّة فأردت أن أعاقبها".
قال ابن عبد البر في الاستذكار ٨/ ٥٤٢: وإنما كره عمر للإماء أن يتهيأن بهيئة الحرائر لئلا يظن أنهن حرائر فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة ومدبرة.
كما أنها كانت من القواعد يشهد لذلك قول ابن عبد البر السابق (سمراء بنت نهيك الأسدية أدركت رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - وعمّرت). انتهى
فيضاف إليهن التبرج والمشي وينسب ذلك منهن إلى ما وقع الظن عليهن فيأثم بذلك الظان، ومعلوم أن الإماء ينصرفن في خدمة ساداتهن فيكثر خروجهن لذلك وتطوافهن، وقوله تجوس الناس معناه تجول في أزقة المدينة مقبلة »ومدبرة.
@@personalprofile1939 not only. There was some evidence not just about showing but even touching; the narration about the prophet allowing the woman to lead him by the hand, for example.
Plzzz provide the links .
May Allah preserve both of you. Purify your intentions every day! ❤️
Put your hand on the heart and ask yourself akhi, if prophet ﷺ was to see your series, would he have approved it? You're fooling no one but your own self akhi. Please stop it
Actually there's no way to know what the Prophet (saw) would think. You couldn't for a fact say by Allah whether the Prophet saw would approve of it or not because we don't actually know because he is not with us anymore
@@the_weal_mawa you don't know of his character and his teachings? Based on his teachings and based on how he lived his life, based on how he reacted in every circumstance of his life you couldn't say that?
From refuting liberals....to becoming one.
honestly bro
reformist whilst claiming to be orthodox
Fricken hell man sad to see.
You’re truly mad for stating this
@@erfannobari906 if it was another Muslim they had on their radar they would say the same thing.
@@JoBlogz Mohammed Hijab has always been less orthodox than you think, you just haven't peeled back the layers enough. I advise you to read the books of scholars of the past regarding controversial manners that come up in his 'apologetics', you will find alot of disparity.
Hey, I'm pretty sure everyone in the chat is saying the same thing: We need more Thomas!"
Whether you make the music with your mouth or instruments, it's still music. The same sound is made, and the same effect is there... May Allah guide us all. Ameen.
In regards to the mouth the scholars differ. But on musical instruments there seems to be a consensus
How can you be convinced beautiful sounds in nature are Haram. Birds sing, water sings, wind sings, leaves sing.. Should we be deaf? Humans like everything else in nature love to make and listen to melodies. I believe it's only Haram when the words and meanings are Haram. Like degenerate and satanic western music.
That is why the scholars that deem instruments to be permissible actually agree with the strictest opinion that there is fundamentaly to difference between vocals and instruments
I like the longer vids pls do more!!
From personal insight, the people who get inflamed about something are, generally, guilty of it. Wear the hat if it fits.
I appreciate brother Hijab and co are taking this criticism seriously. As someone interested in the use of media, I too am conflicted when it comes to portrayal of people accurate enough. Wouldn't make sense to blur people in a movie. I guess we'll have to do what we are supposed to do in real life: lower our gaze.
If the brothers would take a constructive criticism, I would say publish that kind of content from a different account. Just so the message doesn't get lost in the noise or it doesn't contaminate bulk of your good work. May Allah keep us all on the straight path.
Appeal to hypocrisy is a logical fallacy
@@fysmhmd7029 brother, sinning is one thing, but normalizing and justifying - even a sinner recognises its nefariousness and feels defensive about it, especially when the the perpetrator is someone we hold in high esteem and see as a role model of sorts.
Chian, I'm starting to think Thomas is like a genie. He only appears when you rub the lamp... which, in this case, is our collective desire for more Thomas! Make it happen!"
loved this honest and open discussion, Alhamdulillah
I didn't see the video, but here is a verse from the quran I want to share so that people remember, we are all sinners, and the best of sinners are those who repent, may Allah guide us all:
surah 24 verse 30:
˹O Prophet!˺ Tell the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their chastity. That is purer for them. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what they do
To be Honest, I am confused on this matter. But I know one thing there are people who are more conservative than Sahabas & some are more liberal than Liberals & Islam is right in the middle.May Allah guide me to it.
And we definitely need movies to promote Islam. We need our people in media & films. Its a great tool to do Dawah. Ertugrul, Osman & other Islamic series had helped people to find Islam even though it did contain some haram elements. There are stories where people get guidance from Music festival, Night club.
Let's wait & see what the series is about. I hope it is beneficial..
Can you provide the sources???
i have under estimated how much knowledge you guys know about the deen and how and where to approach it from.
respect and love from Oman, please continue making the world a better place and making it easier for non-muslims to approach our beloved religion
13:00
I disagree with you.
When they saw the hair of the women it was like a small part. U know culturally. All women would cover their hair. Muslims being most strict.
I was sitting my dad once. And i think the video was about the very first CCTV camera in a street in europe. Black and white.
We noticed something. Over half the women who passed by the camera actually were covering their hair. Obviously not like Hijab. But u know. Putting a scarf on their head. Even of it shows the hair from some parts.
Pretty sure thats what they meant 1200 years ago. Which stayed up until slowly removed as we see in europe today. Everyday they take off something😂
@Recker1125 If someone wants to object then answer his points:
1) Discuss the evidences hijab presented in the video
2) then discuss the practicality of your view and to what extent you yourself dont apply it and why, can that same principle not then be extended? If not why not?
didn't you hear the fatwah regarding seeing the belly of the non muslim women
I just see that this opinion is too scary. It sounds like someone is gonna come to us.
Watches CORN. And says "well. They are non muslim"
@@Recker1125 sounds like it or taking it to extremes isnt an evidence
@@Recker1125 brother it’s about the situation though, they were talking about during trading and stuff so like normal life situations where you r there for the purpose of for example trading and not for lust.
Porn is only watched cuz of lust.
But i get yourbpoint but the think is that how far can you actually take this for example because of this no muslim should go to the park for a walk or to the mall cuz there will be women uncovered.
COMPLETELY AGREE 💯. And I have believed, ever since watching the 1977 movie _The Message: The Story of Islam_ , in the power of motion picture. It is a tremendously powerful medium that can shape minds, change perspectives and spread any message on an wide scale. Islamic films and series (I highly recommend Payitaht Abdülhamid, a massively important Turkish series on our last Caliph and his hard fight against Zionism and secularism and protecting the Umma and defending the stronghold of Islām) have always greatly impacted me in my Islamic life. Alhamdu-lillāh. 😊
Hyper Agreed
I pray allah swt gives you success in this dunya and the akhira🤲🏾
May Allah bless your work, brother.
Dawah is ibaadah and you cant not introduce your own dawah straying from the messengers, the kufar in the time of many prophets and the prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) in particular they use to have gatherings where music was played and dancing girls were brought this was prevelant in the time of the prophet (ﷺ) and other prophets , they didnt utilise these gatherings to call to Allah سبحانه وتعالى, just because something is prevelant does not mean it should be utilised for dawah like the examples mentioned in the video like films and netflix series etc.... stick to what the prophets of Allah سبحانه وتعالى did they called to islam in a uniform and honourable way across generations.
the prophet time is different than this time, when music was kind of an event etc not everyday life interaction
Well done brother Hijab in taking the bull by the horns and tackling the issues of our time, issues that pertain to not just muslim youth living in the west, but across the globe.
Utilising this medium is genius. May Allah (SWT) preserve you.
Utilize the medium, but not the harams.
What are you thanking him for ? To make it easier for Muslims who felt guilty looking at women ,now feel like he is doing something halal. After watching this video so many men will not not try to lower their gaze like they did before. "It's hard to live not looking at women ,that's why i will look at women and not even try"
@@Abu_TuesdayCorrect! What is this secularist nonesense??
@@EasternRomanOrthodox. wait who are you ? I am talking about my brother ,who th are you coming in middle. Roman orthodox
@@Abu_Tuesday I am here in Palestine with both my Christian & Muslim brothers, and I have the right to say it is haram! Even for us Christians arguing with women is haram, so why your guys having conversations with women in the park on theological matters, it is not their place!
Are you two trained to laugh like that?
If so, you can check out the laughs in One Piece. You might like one of those better.
💯 stand with you on this one..
if you do it 100% islamic way, youd set a precedent for the ummah!
He can do it halal 100%, no women in the picture. He can act till his heart's content.
this ignited some questions in my head. does that mean it is halal so look at playboy magazines?
hopefully you're sarcastic
I'm a bit confused. Isn't the concept of seeing women's hair and neck the same as looking at a nudist? Obviously looking at a naked person is far worse. But the idea of both is that the women's awrah is seen but just alot more when it's a naked person compared to one jist showing hair and neck. Which then begs the question, where is the limit to how much of a women awrah we can see? Or can we see even any?
@@IA67676 Mohammad Hijab won't be able to be consistent. Check my replies to the pinned comment. I translated the refutation to all of his points بفضل الله.
Who is sheikh shoiab?
i am sorry i dont really understand, are u justifying doing haram?
i can understand doing haram and accepting it was better than justifying (but my first lang isnt english i am sure i missundertand and i am at the 6:45 anyways, long way to go until end)
..."people look at Islam like it's a black and white box"
Brother. Truth and falsehood, is black and white. It's one, or the other. How can you even try and justify your haram promoting by using this type of thinking? Alhamdulillah for many of us Muslims, TRUTH is CLEAR from FALSEHOOD! Let us make Du'a to keep our brothers guided on the correct path. We can't shun them, we must help keep all our brothers and sisters on the Sunnah!
Alhamdulilah it is literally a blessing that Islam is the only black and white truth and falsehood religion!
Why is Daniel Haqiqatjou silent about this? It’s making me reconsider everything he ever said
Cos hes a waffler
If that's the case that means you've never watched him
Its amusingly this is a throwaway account as you attack him
He always privately does advice, omar suleiman was private advice until he found he hadn't changed
it took him years before he advised him publicly
He's not, he posted about this recently
The incidents you provide of suhabah like ali dawah mentions about a suhabi who took a guest to his house for food.. was that before or after the hukum of purdah?
We all know the hukum of purdah came very later.
Let me break it to you: Muslims have been using musical instruments (the oud especially) throughout the entire history of Islam. Even Sultan Harūn Ar-Rashīd used to play the guitar but also used to spend a whole lot of time studying the Qur'an. I guess most of us are stupid sinners
Clearly am not much aware of this situation the brothers are talking about but listening to this video i had many doubts in mind. So what i understand from this video is that the non Muslims are using music and movies to influence people so we also as Muslims also need to match what they doing or do something closer to that. Islam doesn't is perfect and the religion is growing without movies or music we dont need to stoop so low to spread the deen. Also, this situation, seeing the hair of the opposite sex's hair, mainly women we aren't allowed looking too long you can have the first glance and turn away but if its in a movie or documentary it will be like more than once but Allah knows best am giving them the benefit of the doubt and look into this thing more inshaalah
Mate please learn Islam, he's not Promoting Non Muslims, he's promoting Islam
Finally people are waking up about these charlatans
Shows you were always a hater and waiting for a reason
Why dont u do as what daniel haqiqatjou does he debates with non muslim women or women who dont wear hijab but he blurs them out
Be used a question about SHOPKEEPERS and used it to justify Hollywood style “dawah”🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
There were brothers who wrote books to refute your show. Make Tawbah and Khalas
Who are these "brothers"?
Name them
I feel like alot of the comments, haven't seen the whole explanation - TRY SINCERELY LISTENING, Mohammed Hijab has a valid point.
13:10 one is selling to earn a living and one is making a film to do what, exactly?
It's laughable. You two are slipping and I think Brother Hijab himself knows it.
Disappointed they didn't go into full detail with woman's awrah. With everything that is said here, does that make it okay to look at girls/women then? When proposing for marriage can you look at her body/curves in order to to see what entices you to marry her like what the prophet S.A.W. said?
You can look at a woman's body for marriage, there is nothing wrong with that per the hadith you mentioned which establishes the exception from lowering the gaze. With that said, what Mohammed Hijab is saying regarding looking at any random woman isn't ok.
@@SIGSEGV1337 ok thanks akhi
If someone wants to object then answer his points:
1) Discuss the evidences hijab presented in the video
2) then discuss the practicality of your view and to what extent you yourself dont apply it and why, can that same principle not then be extended? If not why not?
Evidence** not evidences.
@@Everest-nh3dl sure
"Seeing" is not equal to "showing".
@@personalprofile1939 if the evidences shows u can see then whats the issue?
@@personalprofile1939 he would then be practically showing a halal thing
He’s falling off.
Wealth is a trial for the Muslim nation. Ka'b bin 'Iyad (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, "Verily, there is a Fitnah (trial) for every nation and the trial for my nation (or Ummah) is wealth". At- Tirmidhi, who classified it as Hadith Hasan Sahih.
Thank you brother. Jazak Allah khair.
Allot of these comments haven’t finished quarter of the video pleas don’t comment if u haven’t seen his reasoning ur words will be counted
He gave his reasons this religion is the religion of reasons u do things according to reasons and evidence
their old humor and banter turned into arrogance may allah guide us all
These two are dodgy individuals
07:42 "For every time i look at her you get a sin BLA BLA BLA..."
Mohammed that's not how you talk about Muslims who are trying to be careful with Allah's orders you two are mocking them in the most childish way and that's not how you talk about the rulings that has been said by the scholars of Islam throughout history!!
and please catch your worshipers in the comments they are attacking us thinking we are just criticizing you because we are "haters" which is funny and not true.
Is cartoons allowed? Some say its allowed if its for a islamic reason, so a kids education cartoon, EVEN though drawing humans or aninals is considered haraam?
Its better if you don't bring in irrelevant topics to this.
Those drawings have conditions like non-complete face or body.
@@Haze_in-bw7ff No harm in asking
@@gongkong-oi7qx there's ikhtilaf on this matter
yeah i think we as muslism need to have a balanced view and an open minded mentality. the cult type mentality is going to hurt us in long run anyway..... i think extreme conservatism that has dripped into muslims psychology in present day is the reason people are becoming secular, because they see look this type of mindset will not function.... so if we show them that we can disagree but still function that is when we will succed as an ummah
I blame modern salafism for this close minded and rigid understanding of Shariah. As an arab I can tell you these saudi Scholars used to say TV, Bicycle, Camera, Football, and many other things were "Haram". We all know what happened after that.
@@user-zb8mj9yv4f they still think cameras are haram as they liken it to the artist who paints/draws.
The only difference is they make exceptions for the portrait of the king 🤦
Guy thinks that he gets a free pass to waffle just because he backed Palestine 🤣🤣
You allowed him to. It was people like you who created this illusionary principle that whoever doesn't side with protesters making fools of themselves in public, has no opinion. Don't complain now that you see the fruits of your ignorant efforts.
man like Andrew Tate 👽🗿
You only know him because of Palestine?
@@tgamez6789 No, I've been watching him for 7 years
Where is the description
Sincere question; why does Mohammed Hijab trims his beard while being a follower of the Hanbali madhab?
Man did you consult anyone knowledgeable before doing this?
I can't imagine anyone who wants the best for you advising you to do it or that it is ok to do it. Really what were you thinking. Sajid lipham and Shamsi are going to have a field day with this garbage.
Another question came to mind because you guys use the prophet as an example. For example you say, the prophet did such and such, so do you think you are more pious than him? Yesterday I came across this hadith:
Jabir narrated that The Prophet said: “Do not enter upon Al-Mughibar (the women whose husband are absent), for indeed the Shaitan flows through one of you as the blood flows.” We said: “And you?” He said: “And me, but Allah helped me over him, so I am safe.”
حَدَّثَنَا نَصْرُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ، حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ يُونُسَ، عَنْ مُجَالِدٍ، عَنِ الشَّعْبِيِّ، عَنْ جَابِرٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم قَالَ " لاَ تَلِجُوا عَلَى الْمُغِيبَاتِ فَإِنَّ الشَّيْطَانَ يَجْرِي مِنْ أَحَدِكُمْ مَجْرَى الدَّمِ " . قُلْنَا وَمِنْكَ قَالَ " وَمِنِّي وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَانَنِي عَلَيْهِ فَأَسْلَمُ " . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى هَذَا حَدِيثٌ غَرِيبٌ مِنْ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ . وَقَدْ تَكَلَّمَ بَعْضُهُمْ فِي مُجَالِدِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ مِنْ قِبَلِ حِفْظِهِ . وَسَمِعْتُ عَلِيَّ بْنَ خَشْرَمٍ يَقُولُ قَالَ سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ فِي تَفْسِيرِ قَوْلِ النَّبِيِّ صلى الله عليه وسلم " وَلَكِنَّ اللَّهَ أَعَانَنِي عَلَيْهِ فَأَسْلَمُ " . يَعْنِي أَسْلَمُ أَنَا مِنْهُ . قَالَ سُفْيَانُ وَالشَّيْطَانُ لاَ يُسْلِمُ . وَ " لاَ تَلِجُوا عَلَى الْمُغِيبَاتِ " وَالْمُغِيبَةُ الْمَرْأَةُ الَّتِي يَكُونُ زَوْجُهَا غَائِبًا وَالْمُغِيبَاتُ جَمَاعَةُ الْمُغِيبَةِ .
Jami` at-Tirmidhi 1172
sunnah.com/tirmidhi:1172
So if the prophet was alone in his house arguing with women, does that allow us to do it too?
Are we not meant to follow the example of the prophet SAW?
Why do you want to make Islam hard for yourself?
I see that many are shifting the goalpost from seeing to showing. First things first, showing what exactly? Those who say awrah, what is the evidence of awrah for non Muslim women? What is it? Secondly do they also condemn markets? Because whether it's on a private property or a public someone is responsible for the market. Would they condemn the Khalif for allowing non-muslim women to reveal their hair to Muslim men? Are they against the existence of mixed markets altogether?
Anyone have the source for the companions who are in the dark?
These lot are going down the abul layth route of i can find an opinion for anything therefor there are no rules.
This is why it's important to follow correct usul, instead of the 'all four madhabs are correct' nonsense which just leads to fatwa shopping.
i could of told you all a long long time ago these folks were all grifters
but he is mentioning authentic hadiths to back his opinion???
@@arcya9261 not sure i get you bud
Learned stuff, thank you.
Why the music at the beginning!
video came out an hour ago and is nearly 45 minutes long yet people have been hating in the comments 30-45 minutes ago meaning they didnt even watch the video.
Brother, calling any advice hatred means you'll never get better. When advice is said, don't misword it. Most of the people in the comments like and acknowledge hijabs works for the deen, but would hate it if his attitude changed like this. Hating something that's bad is good. A parent hates that his kids become sick.
just the first 10 mins it’s more than enough, don’t need to hear this long drawn out video to justify something they both know is comprising their beliefs
@@BodyJab295 Who are they to advice Mohammed Hijab or Ali Dawah? How much knowledge do they have exactly?
@@nanonorthlabs3375Why are you here then? To seek attention? Fear Allāh and get off RUclips.
@@AshrafAnam "who are they to advice x and y" is pure arrogance by x and y, and in the case of u, it is you being subjective. Advice is advice, truth is truth. If the imam that memorised the whole quran made a mistake in prayer, a 6 year old kid can correct him.
Well done. Looking forward to the show. And your analysis of these criticisms is on the mark.
Brother Hijab can you make a video about the recent viral topic raised about a well known dawah bro approach a single mum for misyar marriage? Would love to know your thoughts on this.
What's his name?