Canon at Amazon - amzn.to/3vPfyjh Slik Tripods - amzn.to/3xC0nKy K&F Filters - amzn.to/4aGQJoF Tokina Lenses - amzn.to/49IrVv2 Canon Lenses - amzn.to/3WnD41t Godox Flashes - amzn.to/3xFlbB0 Manfrotto Tripods - amzn.to/3W032YP These videos are very time consuming to make and any help to fund the reviews is greatly appreciated. You can use the affiliate links to Amazon (at no cost to yourself). This helps quite a lot, as I buy in items to make review content like this. You can use Patreon to support making these videos - www.patreon.com/mrbazreviews
It's pretty affordable, plenty around some like to use a phone, but it's not the same in some ways. Memories are important! Hope you are keeping well, thanks for dropping in again
People tend to stop the lens down for landscapes (smaller F number), use longer focal lengths for portraits (but not always). 50mm F1.8 is the obvious choice cheap and gives you a fast lens and portrait lens too. 18-135mm isn't bad for an all rounder with a longer range.
Many older cameras are still good, bit less resolution but more than usable. This one was interesting as it matured a bit in this popular series added live view, better viewfinder etc. I might look at others the 350D was very popular too.
@@jan-martinulvag1953 He said you won't see any difference at RUclips resolution, and you won't unless you start doing 100/200% crops. I'm not megapixel based at all but there is clearly an obvious jump in resolution 8-24MP. That lens is merely OK, so a good lens would show it more. But I would say resolution isn't something I find to be worth worrying about, it was only the very early cameras where it was very limited.
It's good for getting into photography, if you're more experienced you can pay more, but this model is well featured and still delivers good images today. It's affordable and lots of lenses around too.
Canon at Amazon - amzn.to/3vPfyjh
Slik Tripods - amzn.to/3xC0nKy K&F Filters - amzn.to/4aGQJoF
Tokina Lenses - amzn.to/49IrVv2 Canon Lenses - amzn.to/3WnD41t
Godox Flashes - amzn.to/3xFlbB0
Manfrotto Tripods - amzn.to/3W032YP
These videos are very time consuming to make and any help to fund the reviews is greatly appreciated. You can use the affiliate links to Amazon (at no cost to yourself). This helps quite a lot, as I buy in items to make review content like this.
You can use Patreon to support making these videos -
www.patreon.com/mrbazreviews
I so need one of these since my wife passed in January I moved in with my daughter and grandson and could use one to capture those memories thx Mr B
It's pretty affordable, plenty around some like to use a phone, but it's not the same in some ways. Memories are important! Hope you are keeping well, thanks for dropping in again
Got this camera, it does struggle a bit in low light but despite its age still performs really well
It's pretty cheap these days and a reasonable buy, still quite good overall.
It's pretty cheap these days and a reasonable buy, still quite good overall.
Great video with lots of information. Thanks for creating and sharing it.
Thanks appreciate that. I wanted to make something useful, it took a while but hopefully it will help people
Hey, just found my grandad’s old 450d, any recommendations for settings for better landscape and portrait photos, any lens recommendations?
People tend to stop the lens down for landscapes (smaller F number), use longer focal lengths for portraits (but not always). 50mm F1.8 is the obvious choice cheap and gives you a fast lens and portrait lens too. 18-135mm isn't bad for an all rounder with a longer range.
Thanks now i feel really old, as the 450d was my first digital slr.... I am not even 50years old...
Even the 350 D is very good. I took the same scenes with the 350D and the M100 and its very strange , cos the 350 is just as good.
Many older cameras are still good, bit less resolution but more than usable. This one was interesting as it matured a bit in this popular series added live view, better viewfinder etc. I might look at others the 350D was very popular too.
@@MrBazReviews when 8 mp gives about the same detail as 24 mp, then you have to ask yourself: What is going on here?
@@MrBazReviews watch this video: Photography on a Budget Part 9: Canon APS-C 40D & 90D Compared
@@jan-martinulvag1953 Could be focus accuracy or lenses. 8 to 24mp there is certainly a difference. Higher up you go less you can see it
@@jan-martinulvag1953 He said you won't see any difference at RUclips resolution, and you won't unless you start doing 100/200% crops. I'm not megapixel based at all but there is clearly an obvious jump in resolution 8-24MP. That lens is merely OK, so a good lens would show it more. But I would say resolution isn't something I find to be worth worrying about, it was only the very early cameras where it was very limited.
i have this camera, can i charge it from usb or do i have to use the charger for the battery?
You have to use a charger with this, it can't charge in camera
Is this a decent camera still in 2024?
It's good for getting into photography, if you're more experienced you can pay more, but this model is well featured and still delivers good images today. It's affordable and lots of lenses around too.